Current problems with draft Local Plan accurately predicted in 2009

The potential problems with the 5 year land supply were all highlighted in July 2009 in the report of a Task and Finish Forum on 5 year land supply (here are extracts):

1. Our assessment of our District wide figures shows that we have only just over five years availability. An Inspector at a planning application appeal could take the view that this is close enough to the five year threshold to side with an applicant/dismiss our arguments.
2. The District wide five year figure is based on our assessment and assumptions we have made. A developer might challenge these and come to a different conclusion (i.e. that land supply falls under five years) and persuade an Inspector that his/her evaluation is the more accurate.
3. Circumstances change and assessment/s done at the present time (and initially in 2008) can and will be out of date in the future.

Unfortunately, the document has since been removed from the EDDC website.

 

Two out of three Feniton appeals dismissed! Only the smaller appeal for 32 homes allowed, 200 extra dismissed!

Well done everyone who put up such a strong case to the Planning Inspector at Feniton – you all deserve pats on the back – and more.  A victory for common sense!

http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/fantastic_news_for_feniton_as_all_appeals_dismissed_except_32_at_acland_par

Particular thanks should go to the two councillors for the wards affected:  Councillor Claire Wright and Councillor Susie Bond who kept everyone informed of what was going on and rallied support time and time again.  Special thanks to Susie who, with no previous council experience, took on the mantle of councillor for Feniton late in the day with such verve and vigour!

As Martin Luther King said: The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice!

The blame game – time to stop looking for scapegoats and start work

goat

Much time and effort has recently been put in to trying to work out who is to blame for the current problems we have with our Draft Local Plan.  Various groups (including EDA) have been suggested as being responsible for the current situation, even though EDA was not in existence when the figures for the Draft Plan were submitted to EDDC by its Planning Policy officers and gave no evidence either to the Local Development Framework Panel nor to the Inspector.

It is far too late for blame.  Responsibility now lies with councillors and officers to give the Inspector what he wants as quickly as possible.  Only they can do this.

Can they do it?  We have to hope so and we must all give officers and councillors all the support they need to get their facts right and get their evidence in as soon as practicable so that developers will have no opportunity or excuse for building on land that is not meant to be available to them.

The effort to find scapegoats to blame needs to stop and the action needs to start.  Looking for scapegoats is wasting valuable time.

 

Should one be “relaxed” about a crisis?

beach1

The Leader of East Devon District Council says he is “relaxed” about the failure of the draft Local Plan at its first hurdle.  He said:

“In the circumstances I am relaxed about the extra work we have to do. We will now put together an action plan showing what we will be doing and when. We hope to go back to the inspector in the autumn with the extra information he needs”.

Can we trust someone who is so relaxed to motivate others (the same people who gave the Inspector the first draft plan which took 5 years and one false start to produce) to give the Inspector what he needs and to give it to him quickly enough to put a stop to the development frenzy that shows no sign of abating and every sign of increasing during this policy vacuum?

Is an “action plan” enough?  Is” hope” enough?  Is being relaxed the appropriate way to deal with this crisis?