Neighbourhood Plans – not a panacea but useful

Ottery St. Mary is thinking of setting aside obe-eighth of its precept (£20,000) to produce a neighbourhood plan.  “This money is one eighth of the budget,” he said. “Would the neighbourhood plan have had any difference to the 300 houses planned for Ottery St Mary?”

Answer: no.  Whilst there is no Local Plan and no 6 year land supply developers have the upper hand.

Once there is a Local Plan, that trumps everything including Neighbourhood Plans, so, at the moment a Neighbourhood Plan counts for nothing.

However, once there IS a Local Plan AND a 6 year land supply, any neighbourhood can then say what it wants to happen to any land not covered by the Local Plan.

It is certainly best if a council then puts together a Neighbourhood Plan because, if it does not, ANY group which has a connection to the area can take responsibility for preparing one, which could mean developers or Sainsbury’s or any other group with a tenuous connection to the area could put one together and might get it agreed.

However, East Devon District Council has the final say in whether a Neighbourhood Plan is acceptable to them – back to Square One!  Also, no agreed Neighbourhood Plan has yet faced legal challenge so who is to say that it would carry the full force of planning law – there are many instances of challenges being successful in similar circumstances.  Until enough case law is built up we can only hope that a well-researched, well-written Neighbourhood Plan with lots of robust evidence would meet these challenges.

So, an outlay of £20,000 might or might not protect Ottery from some inappropriate or unwanted development so perhaps on balance better to try than not!

 

Who pays?

We learn from a comment from Councillor Roger Giles on the blog of Councillor Claire Wright (claire-wright.org) that the reason given for making it so difficult for ordinary people to speak at Development Management Committee meetings is that the lack of a 5 year land supply means that there are now so many applications that there just is not time.  He also points out that one other reason that there is not time is that members of the DMC speak at length and repetitiously and then generally vote in a very similar way, few needing to be swayed by the intellectual arguments of other members it seems.

How dreadful that we must pay for EDDC’s own past and present mistakes.

So when we have a new Local Plan – hopefully very soon – and the number of planning applications decreases, will we then go back to former arrangements where we did not have to register with a written question days in advance and hope that we won the lottery to speak?

Aaaah …..