EDA AGM – Chairman’s Report:
Daily Archives: 17 May 2014
No sanctions to be taken against Cllr Graham Salter.
Councillors and officers..and all of us… are busy people. But there are signs that the Standards’ sub-committee were having their own time wasted, as well as Cllr Graham Salter’s valuable worktime (he’s self-employed) at this week’s hearing called by EDDC’s Monitoring Officer. It went on and on…..and after only a majority vote (2 to 1) , he was found to have breached the councillors’ code of conduct on one count. But it was clearly not a serious issue, as it was then decided no sanctions were warranted.
Consultants (paid) council officers (paid), Cllr Salter (unpaid ) and members of the public (unpaid) were obliged to wait for hours, while the sub-committee deliberated.
Had this been a serious case, the expense and length of the hearing could be seen to be justified…. and not perceived as part of a District-wide pattern of apparent attempts to gag dissenters.
Our earlier report on the same hearing is here: https://eastdevonwatch.org/2014/05/15/why-did-you-become-a-councillor/
A3052 today, Uplyme and Rousdon tomorrow – another Cranbrook?
A developer has put in an application for 300 houses on the land currently used for Lyme Regis’s summer park and ride scheme. The land is in East Devon but is adjacent to Lyme Regis. This was not in the last Local Plan and did not figure in the Current Local Plan.
The developer (Hallam Homes) had a poorly -advertised “consultation” exhibition in Lyme Regis recently but nowhere in East Devon. This is contrary to the requirement that a development in East Devon must be advertised “appropriately” within the district.
It may be that the villages of Uplyme and Rousdon do not think that this development will affect them. Think again. Today, it is one field on the A3052 but it is only a matter of time in this development-led era in East Devon that the current developers (or new ones) will decide to link up the parishes of Uplyme and Rousdon with the development now being planned. Before long this could be a new town the size of Cranbrook.
As an extension to Lyme Regis, this would totally be in East Devon and the Dorset economy would be stretched for doctors, dentists, schools, etc just as the East Devon economy would be stretched.
Is this “sustainable”? Who in their right mind would think so? Where are the jobs? How will people commute? Where is the necessary infrastructure?
This is the Jurassic Coast tourist route – already developers have their eye on the Exeter end of this road – how long before we have the road completely covered in a ribbon development of houses from Lyme to Exeter and from the A3o52 to Raymonds Hill?
EDA has new Chairman
At EDA’s well-attended AGM last night, some new officers were elected to posts.
Our new Chairman is Paul Arnott of Colyton, Vice-Chairman remains John Witherington of Feniton
More to follow.
Yet another councillor reported to the EDDC Standards Committee
Pattern? What pattern? (see post below)
http://www.eastdevon.gov.uk/axminster_town_council_code_of_conduct_finding.pdf:
Code of Conduct Finding
An investigation into a complaint by District Councillor Twiss (Conservative Council and Whip) about Axminster Town Councillor Cllr Hayward (known for his independent views) has concluded that Cllr Hayward breached the councillor Code of Conduct.
In paragraph 4(a) of the Code of Conduct, it says: ‘You must treat others with courtesy and respect’. The Investigator found that, in an email to a group of councillors, Cllr Hayward was disrespectful towards a member of staff at the District Council.
His report states:
‘Treating people with courtesy and respect involves having regard for them and their feelings and showing politeness towards them. The requirement to treat a person with respect applies even if they are not present.
I found that three of Councillor Hayward’s emails were written in his capacity as a councillor. Having examined the content of these, I have found that…Councillor Hayward was disrespectful…He therefore failed to follow paragraph 4(a) of the Code of Conduct.’
In the Complaints Procedure, where there has been a finding of a breach of the Code of Conduct, it is possible to resolve the com
plaint to both the complainant and councillor’s satisfaction. In this instance, Cllr Hayward has withdrawn his disrespectful comments and
accepted that the officer was not as he described. Cllr Twiss has accepted this, although he would also have preferred Cllr Hayward to apologise for his disrespectful and inappropriate behaviour.
During the course of this complaint, Cllr Hayward stated his wish to make a counter complaint against Cllr Twiss, however there was not sufficient evidence to warrant further action.
This Finding will be posted on the Council’s website on the Standards Committee page under public notices.
Denise Lyon
Deputy Chief Executive and Monitoring Officer
7 May 2014
Note from EDA: For the record, here are some possibly disrespectful comments made publicly by Councillor Twiss. The second example comes from his letter to a local newspaper, in his official capacity as Tory Party Whip.
… (about a councillor who used to be a Conservative but is now an Independent) “This is a bit rich coming from someone who now flies under a white flag having previously been a Conservative party Councillor and Whip who paraphrasing his wording presumably chanced his arm to get elected having jumped ship from one political group to another.”
….(about all Independent Councillors) ”Invariably a single issue with ancillary directly related ones is the overriding reason for Independents standing, holding back progress and directly disadvantaging their communities by paying little attention to other matters as a result.”
EDA would be interested to know if there have been any formal complaints against Cllr Twiss, and if so, how they have been dealt with.
For the full version of Cllr Twiss’s letter, and more comment, go to http://sidmouthindependentnews.wordpress.com/2013/11/29/have-whip-but-dont-ever-use-it/