Skypark: oh dear, poor EDDC workers ….. get those earplugs and sunglasses ready!

Planning application 14/0197/MFUL for a 5634 sq m parcel distribution centre including 130 car parking spaces,120 light goods vehicles/public carrier vehicles spaces and 16 heavy goods vehicle spaces

Officers were very unhappy at this development and from the link to the letter below seem to be taking the developer, St Modwyn, to task: lights too bright, not enough trees to screen the facility….

So, EDDC HQ surrounded by: an ambulance control centre, an energy plant, planes landing at the airport all day and now a parcel delivery centre. Not quite like sitting in the Knowle arboretum in your lunch break!

Still, if they need an ambulance or want to collect a parcel or go away for a weekend break it will be very useful – and probably quite warm!

Click to access obj.pdf

Oh, and on page 5 note the developer’s point that they have had no other takers for the site in the last 4 years …..

Now, remind us, why did EDDC choose Skypark? Oh yes, they flogged the Honiton site off to a supermarket and officers weren’t asked if they wanted to stay at Knowle!

Housing Federation “Home Truths” report 2013-2014

315 WORKING people a day being forced into housing benefit by soaring rents,
more info from this link:

http://www.housing.org.uk/media/home-truths/

Stirrings at Westminster, and nationally, to reform NPPF

The national group to which EDA belongs (Community Voice on Planning, CoVoP) , has sent this report:

Dear All
We had a CoVoP committee meeting on Sunday and seem to have a lot going on nationally at the moment. We’re sure that you know about much of it but just in case you don’t:
Community and Local Government Inquiry into the operation of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)
The committee has received over 200 written submissions (many from our affiliates and their members) which are available on their website – see links on our page in the “News” section http://covop.org/inquiry/ . They are now starting to take oral evidence and the first session was Monday 9 June – you can find a recording via our page on the enquiry. We are in contact with them to see if we can provide oral evidence on behalf of community groups in a future session.
Greg Mulholland’s Bill for amendment of the NPPF
This private members bill has lapsed due to the shortage of parliamentary time but Greg is currently organising a roundtable for groups who share such a vision for the future of our planning system. The aim of the roundtable event is to make clear to both the current and next government the planning issues they must tackle. We will be attending the event.
All-Party Parliamentary Group on the Greenbelt
This group was set up last year by Chris Skidmore and was due to publish a report in spring of this year – as spring is now officially over we are trying to find out exactly what this group is doing and how we can influence their activities.
All political parties are now in election fever
With the elections now less than a year away, all parties are now focusing on how to win the next election. We are strictly non-party-political but feel that all of the major parties can be tarred with the same brush. They are not listening to the views on the voters when they are told that the planning system is not working – localism doesn’t exist and developers are running riot all over the country. With the current status of the planning laws, developers can obtain planning permission to build almost anywhere and then have the possibility of land banking while they obtain additional permissions. More houses will be built in the countryside and small towns and not where the real need is which is in the large employment centres. This will increase carbon emissions as more people have to travel longer to work. The NPPF talks about well-being, environment, infrastructure and sustainability, which are all good things. However, in reality the only thing being considered is whether the LPA have a five year supply, or not.
We need your help:
Tell us what the 3 KEY ISSUES are in your area and let’s try to get the common issues promoted more widely.
Tell all planning protest groups that you know about us and ask them to affiliate to us – it doesn’t cost them anything and it will strengthen our hand when we are talking to MP’s and Ministers.
During the questioning at the oral evidence session in Parliament on Monday, two comments were made by members of the committee which we think were incorrect. If anybody has any evidence to the contrary, please would they send it in so that we can write to the committee to refute the statements.
Simon Danczuk MP stated that Local Planning Authorities had had ten years to formulate their Local Plans. We are aware that there are some areas of the country where there has been local government re-organisation and this has interfered with the plan preparation. Has anybody any information on this?
Mark Pawsey MP stated that there had not been any instances of the greenbelt being developed or being lost because of the Local Plan.
In both these instances, the people being questioned were not able to give instances. As one person stated, he was not aware of any instances. That does not mean that they don’t exist. Please can anybody put forward any evidence for either of these circumstances?

Thanks for reading.
Julie
Admin at CoVoP
Community Voice on Planning
A National Alliance to provide communities with an effective voice on planning.
http://www.covop.org