More people to be reported to the police? Journalists ignore Twiss warnings!

In spite of exhortations to ban the word “cull” unless it refers to badgers or seagulls, newspapers all over the UK have ignored Councillor Phil Twiss (how dare they!) and have continued to use the word in a political (and therefore unacceptable – at least to him) way. Here are three examples from the last few days. We trust that Councillor Twiss will report all the journalists involved to the relevant police forces in Wales, Northern Ireland and England.

(But at least a “natural cull of councillors” sounds quite “sustainable”!)

http://www.southwalesargus.co.uk/news/11645479.EDITOR_S_CHAIR__If_councils_ask_the_public_how_to_save_money__they_ignore_the_answers_at_their_peril/

“Council mergers will lead to a natural cull of councillors, but what about those authorities that refuse to merge?”

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/northern-ireland/massive-bus-cull-on-way-13-towns-to-lose-all-local-bus-services-metro-services-will-be-less-frequent-30800756.html

“Massive bus cull on way: 13 towns to lose all local bus services, Metro services will be less frequent.”

Councillor Twiss really is going to be a busy man!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp/article-2860576/Mugabes-party-expels-ex-spokesman.html

“A series of top officials, including former spokesman Rugare Gumbo, have been expelled, but it is Vice President Joice Mujuru who has taken the brunt of the cull.”

Is our MP’s Party “Committed to protecting our natural environment”?

Not in East Devon, nor indeed in the UK, as pointed out in this letter in the Exmouth Journal (04/12/2014):

‘Last week Hugo Swire told us that his party is committed to protecting the natural environment, keeping development sustainable etc. But that view is not shared across the country.
The Government planning policies have failed to protect communities from rapid and disproportionate development. That was the widespread view of those, like me, who had been invited form all parts of the country to Westminster in September to give evidence to a Parliamentary Select Committee.
Everyone had stories to share of large tracts of agricultural land being built on; villages doubled in size; brownfield sites in the centre of old industrial towns being left, while the green fields around the margins are being built on because it is cheaper; extensive building in flood plains; the green belt eroded; AONB protection swept aside.
All this is happening under the guise of sustainable development because of the Government’s drive for house building at any cost and in any place. But the term sustainable is so ill defined that using wooden cladding or installing plastic plumbing in place of copper and a low flush toilet, ticks the box.
No thought is being given to social or environmental sustainability. Yes, we need housing to meet local needs, particularly affordable housing. But we are not getting it and we have sacrificed a lot of agricultural land in the process. Affordable housing promised in planning applications disappears when developers plead poverty. I understand none of the affordable housing promised by Tesco in Seaton, for example, will be built.
David Daniel’

Poacher, gamekeeper or shoot owner?

In today’s Sunday Times there is an article on the giant engineering conglomerate, Aecom. The article talks about the company’s desire to move away fron simple engineering consultancy and towards becoming a “one stop shop” for construction” too. For example, a representative of the company now sits on the Mayor of London’s planning advisory committee working on projects such as Crossrail 2.

Now Aecom has createc Aecom Capital which is prepared to take equity in clients’ projects. It wants to “plan, design, build and operate infrastructure assets around the world”.

The “embedded” or “non-embedded” member of staff/consultant (depending on your view) Relocation Manager at EDDC who has worked for so long on the aborted Skypark project, works for (or doesn’t work for, depending on your view) Davis Langdon – owned by Aecom.

So, you have the interesting situation of a company both giving supposedly impartial advice whilst offering partnership investment and ” one stop shop” services in the projects they are supporting/ promoting/ impartially reporting on.