… EDDC had its press release on relocation out on its website together with lots of quotes from the meeting so soon after it ended?
Press Officer working late – again.
… EDDC had its press release on relocation out on its website together with lots of quotes from the meeting so soon after it ended?
Press Officer working late – again.
Three fine opening speeches from the public were deftly rolled into one tonight, by the Chief Executive Mark Williams, yet again ignoring the specific and critical detail. They were all asking the same question, he said, which was for an independent report on figures for the claimed financial and energy savings used to justify EDDC’s office relocation plan. The answer was definitely “No”. This suggestion would be an affront to EDDC’s consultants and auditors, said the CEO, sweeping it firmly aside.
Later, however, the council heartily supported a motion read out by Sidmouth Councillor Graham Troman, that there should be “full checks and balances” carried out on the costs of moving from Knowle. This appeared a somewhat obvious procedure, with such a heavily-criticised multi-million pound project, not just to observers in the public gallery, but also to the Chief Executive, who insisted that that would happen anyway.
Significantly, perhaps, there was general agreement in the council chamber, that the results of these “full checks and balances” were not likely to be known before the May 2015 election. Councillor Claire Wright’s proposal that relocation should be put on hold until after May 7th, 2015, was rejected, leaving the way clear for a possible Knowle sale contract to be meanwhile signed.
So that’s alright, then….
More posts will be added here, on the large number of questions from opposition councillors and from the public.
EDA Vice-Chair John Withrington, asked for a date for the completion of the Local Plan. NO DATE WAS GIVEN, and the meeting moved on….
So that’s alright, then….
We said the General Election was going to get dirty!
“The Conservative Party chairman Grant Shapps has been accused of attempting to silence a critical left-wing blog in the run-up to the election by sending out spurious legal threats from lawyers.
Solicitors acting for Mr Shapps have written to the editor of the Political Scrapbook blog three times in the last six months, threatening to sue the publication over two articles about the party chairman.
The blog has also received a warning letter from the same firm of lawyers acting on behalf of another Conservative MP, who featured in the blog.
However, despite the warnings, no proceedings have been initiated against Political Scrapbook. The blog’s editor, Laurence Durnan, has accused Mr Shapps of “trying to shut down embarrassing stories”.
In one letter, lawyers for Mr Shapps accused the blog of writing a “false and defamatory” article about the Tory chairman’s local Conservative club. The blog had revealed that Mr Shapps’ election campaigns had been funded by a “secretive club” in his constituency which had been fined Financial Conduct Authority after refusing to reveal financial data or the names of its officers.
Despite only objecting to word “secretive” in the article, the letter from a city law firm demanded “the publication of a retraction, together with the removal of the misrepresentation from the article”.
It added: “In the event that this matter cannot be resolved without recourse to litigation we reserve the right to provide a copy of this correspondence to the court at the appropriate time in any such proceedings. We trust that this matter can be resolved expediently and without the increase in costs which would be substantial if this matter were to proceed.”
After receiving a subsequent letter about the matter, he pointed out the FSA fine and state the dictionary definition of “secretive” and no action was taken.
“This is pure and simple intimidation, designed to censor the publication of factually accurate stories which are strongly in the public interest,” he said.
A Tory source insisted Mr Shapps was perfectly within his rights to complain.
“The Government’s flagship planning policy is leading to “inappropriate and unwanted housing development”, MPs have warned.
The cross-party Communities and Local Government Committee also raised concerns that town centres were not being given proper protection against the threat from large out-of-town retail developments.
They called for the Government to scrap rules allowing small shops and offices to be converted to housing without the need for planning permission, arguing that the changes could lead to town centres becoming “an unattractive place to visit or, indeed, live”. …
…The committee said: “Our report has identified a number of issues with the operation of the NPPF: that it is not preventing unsustainable development; that it is leading to communities being subject to inappropriate and unwanted housing development; and that it is giving insufficient protection to England’s town centres.”
But there was no need to “tear up or withdraw” the controversial document, but insisted ministers should ” reinforce its provisions and ensure it does the job it was intended to do”. …
…They said: “Councils that fail to produce a plan surrender their ability to influence the future development of their local areas.”
The committee’s Labour chairman Clive Betts said: “Councils must do more to protect their communities against the threat of undesirable development by by moving quickly to get an adopted local plan in place.”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa/article-2875415/Warning-planning-policy.html
and reviewed in more detail here:
… and other EDDC topics on this new hotline: https://twitter.com/EastDevonTories
Don’t forget Full Council meeting starts at 6.30pm this evening, at Knowle.