“One party councils raise corruption risks”

“A forthcoming report by the Electoral Reform Society is to raise concerns that local authorities dominated by a single political party appear more prone to corruption than councils where there is a more even balance between parties.

The research, which is being prepared by the ERS as part of its work into local accountability, will be published next month in time for the autumn party political conference season.

Ahead of publication, Public Finance has been told that the report will demonstrate that councils dominated by one group – measured by uncontested seats or one party holding two-thirds of council seats – are at greater risk of corruption, particularly in procurement decisions.

The research by University of Cambridge academic Mihály Fazekas points to a “clear relationship between poor accountability at the ballot box and risks of corruption in local government contracting”, the ERS told PF.

The study has used data on contracts from 2009 to 2013 to look for procurement “red flags” – such as where only a single bid is submitted or where there was a shortened length of time between advertising the bid and the submission deadline. It has also looked at the difference between the original estimated contract value and the actual final contract value, with savings indicating healthy competition among bidders.

The final report will show that weak accountability in either council elections or party control can lead to both a substantially higher corruption risk and lower procurement cost savings, ERS deputy chief executive Darren Hughes told PF.

Ahead of publication of the report, he said that a clear link has been established between unopposed local councils and poor contracting.

“When single parties have almost complete control of councils, it appears that this is a recipe for laziness when it comes to securing decent contracts for services,” Hughes explained.

“The public seem to be getting a much poorer deal in areas where they have what are essentially single-party states running their services. It’s an extremely worrying situation.

“England and Wales’ first past the post voting system for local elections only makes this worse, with parties able to win the vast majority of seats often on a minority of the vote. A proportional system, such as the systems used in Northern Ireland and Scotland, would make ‘one party states’ a thing of the past – and would bring greater transparency and scrutiny to current shady contracting committees,” Hughes said.”

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2015/08/one-party-councils-raise-corruption-risks-ers-finds

No, most definitely not, Minister

Lib Dem Home Office Minister in the previous coalition government, Norman Baker, shares an anecdote about his time in office – previous anecdotes in this article covering his use of a bicycle and attempt to start a recycling scheme are equally dispiriting:

My first taste of government — as a junior minister at Transport — provided some real Yes Minister delights. Among my responsibilities were the internal affairs of the department itself and in January 2011, I felt obliged to write to the permanent secretary to ask for action on two connected fronts: the building’s air conditioning system and staff access to window keys.

They were connected because the air conditioning didn’t work efficiently, creating a temperature that was either chilled or stifling, and the ability to open windows was the only real way to affect this.

The position was most acute after 5.30pm, when the air conditioning promptly cut out, despite the fact that there were often large numbers of officials and ministers still working. In response, I was given an assurance that the air conditioning was working in optimum fashion, which it clearly was not, but that it would be looked at afresh at some unspecified point in the future.

I decided to concentrate on the windows.

After weeks of prevarication and inaction, exasperated, I demanded a note as to why keys could not be distributed. It is worth quoting at some length the reply I received from the unfortunate civil servant deputed to deal with this crucial matter.

They were determined not to give me a key and piled reason upon reason:

‘As a result of low window sills staff could fall out of the open window if someone was to trip over an obstacle or absent-mindedly leaned against what they thought was a closed window . . . the more windows are open, the bigger the risk.

‘A significant number of staff use the window sills for storage, and such items could be knocked out of an open window and fall onto passers-by below, with possibly serious consequences.

‘There have been some instances in the past two years of people firing air guns from the flats behind the building . . . open windows could allow staff to be targets.

‘Continually opening and closing the windows can weaken the locks which are 15 years old and could allow the windows to open unexpectedly (this has happened at least once).

‘At the moment, the windows can only be opened and closed by security staff. Providing staff with keys could lead to a security breach. [On the sixth floor?!]

‘There can sometimes be strong draughts through the windows, especially on the higher floors, which can blow papers around.

‘To agree to open a window for one person immediately sets a precedent for others who may not find the air conditioning to their liking, so we could end up with windows being opened across the building.’

Presumably because the air conditioning wasn’t working properly. Faced with this barrage of guff, I decided to take a practical and pragmatic approach. Jo Guthrie, the excellent private secretary who ran my office, ran out to a buy a window key from a hardware shop.

I was finding it easier to squeeze millions out of the Treasury than to get simple changes enacted within my own Government department.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3231415/Even-madder-Yes-Minister-Wickedly-indiscreet-Darkly-funny-make-despair-modern-politics-memoirs-one-Coalition-minister-reveal-Westminster-is.html

Government’s Freedom of Information department being monitored by I ormation Commissioner!

The Government department with overall responsibility for freedom of information (FOI) policy is itself being monitored by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) amid concerns over the timeliness of its responses to FOI requests.

The ICO announced today that it would be reviewing the performance of the MoJ (Ministry of Justice) in relation to FOI requests received between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015.

“This is due to delays being identified in a significant number of cases where the statutory time limit of 20 working days was exceeded,” the watchdog said.

The latest MOJ quarterly FOI statistics have indicated that they are well below 85% which is one of the triggers for formal monitoring to be considered by the ICO.

The watchdog has reported that four councils – Greenwich, Cumbria, Nottingham and Salford – have now been taken off formal monitoring following improvements in their performance.

However, the ICO continues to monitor the Metropolitan Police Service and the Department of Finance and Personnel (Northern Ireland).

Graham Smith, the ICO’s Deputy Commissioner and Director of Freedom of Information, said: “Transparency is a cornerstone of a modern democracy and public authorities must respect people’s rights of access to information. That means responding to FOI requests within the statutory timeline of 20 working days, or with a short permitted extension where weighing up the public interest is particularly complex.
“We hope the Ministry of Justice uses this monitoring period to bring about significant improvements in this aspect of its service to the public. Statutory time limits are not optional. The improvements we’ve seen at the Royal Borough of Greenwich, Cumbria County, Nottingham City and Salford City Council are very welcome and I hope these service levels will be maintained.”

http://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24340:ministry-of-justice-to-be-monitored-over-delays-in-responding-to-foi-requests&catid=59&Itemid=27