There truly is one law for the rich and another for the poor

“David Cameron was confronted in the Commons on Wednesday with figures showing that thousands more government inspectors are employed to tackle benefits fraud than deal with tax evasion by the wealthiest UK residents.

Angus Robertson, the Scottish National Party’s leader in Westminster, asked the prime minister why 3,250 department of work and pensions (DWP) staff have been assigned to investigate welfare fraud, while 300 specialise in dealing with the rich.

“Surely we should care equally about people abusing the tax system and those abusing the benefit system?” Robertson asked during prime minister’s questions. “Why has this government had ten times more staff dealing often with the poorest in society abusing benefits than with the super-rich evading their taxes?”

In fact the government confirmed on Wednesday that the ranks of DWP benefits investigators have swelled to 3,700 – a higher number than the one quoted by Robertson, and up from 2,600 in February last year.

That compares with 700 people who work at HM Revenue and Customs in the two units whose job it is to investigate the wealthiest 500,000 people living in the UK.

David Cameron was jeered when he admitted the figures cited by Robertson would need to be examined, but retorted “they sound to me entirely bogus”. He added: “The predominant job of the DWP is to make sure that people receive their benefits. The predominant job of HMRC is to make sure people pay their taxes”.

Benefits fraud costs the government £1.3bn a year, according to official statistics, while the gap between tax owed and tax paid is put at £34bn a year by officials.”

http://gu.com/p/4tb4b

“Politicians don’t know the price of milk – but they do know how to set up a shell company”

“… In the old days, courtiers aped the style of the monarch. Modern politicians aspire to be like today’s rulers – our corporate overlords. If you spend a sizeable chunk of your career making sure corporations can take their money offshore, and hope to work for those companies later in your career with some title like Non-Executive Director Of Thanks For All The Favours, and if corporations actively court political influence through massive lobbying operations, then you will end up with a certain level of symbiosis. …

… In the end, as a senior politician having spent a career in what is the PR wing of corporatism, offshore tax arrangements might well be one of the few things you know anything about. I mean that quite literally. Politics is full of people who don’t know the price of a pint of milk but do understand the incorporation of a shell company. Why wouldn’t they have a trust in Panama?

Corporations may hire celebrity spokesmodels, personify themselves as mascots, and in the US, demand that they have the constitutional rights of people, but they are not people. They are blueprints for making money, and they don’t address their social obligations because they don’t care. I suspect before long we’ll see corporations donating to space exploration in the hope that they’ll be able to take advantage of a zero per cent tax rate by screwing their “Company Headquarters” plaques to the surface of the moon. In a decade, it’ll be covered with so much tessellating brass, it’ll shimmer like a distant glitterball through the gaps in the roofs of their employees’ shacks.

http://gu.com/p/4t9n2

“Tory MP Stewart Jackson Says Academies Plan Is ‘Rushed, Ill-Thought Out And Flawed’ “

“A Tory MP has criticised the Government’s plan to turn all schools in to academies, labelling the plan “rushed, ill-thought out and flawed”.

Stewart Jackson, MP for Peterborough, said he was willing to defy the party line as the reform was a “million miles from what a Conservative Party in office should be doing”.

His comments come as Labour today forces a vote in the Commons on the plan announced by Chancellor George Osborne in his Budget last month.

Jackson’s withering criticism of the “compulsory academisation” of primary and secondary schools underlines growing unease among some Tory backbenchers at the flagship plan being taken forward by Education Secretary, Nicky Morgan.

Writing in a column for his local newspaper the Peterborough Telegraph, seen by HuffPost UK, the MP argues the move is a “recipe for upheaval as well as muddle and costly confusion” and that there is “no evidence (as yet)” that the move will improve schools.

He says: “Do we really believe that remote civil servants or ‘local’ Regional Schools Commissioners will be adequate substitutes for the real local knowledge, expertise, passion, teamwork, skills and shared history of local councillors, dedicated education officers and parents ‘on the ground?’

“The difference is obvious: at least the latter are accountable to their electorate, whilst the former are accountable only to their hierarchy – namely the Secretary of State, rather than pupils, parents, teachers or governors.”

The MP goes on that the plan will risks “squashing local choice, differentiation and expertise” and “rightly irritates local councillors”.

In recognition of many Tories feeling ill at ease with state control, he argues: “It’s because I’m a Conservative that I can see that something like this is a million miles from what a Conservative Party in office should be doing.”

Meanwhile, one senior Tory told HuffPost UK: “I don’t believe in ‘compulsory freedom’. There’s lots of us who aren’t comfortable with this.”

Under the reform, all state schools must become academies by 2020 or have plans to do so by 2022.

Jackson questions whether academy chains – so-called Multi Academy Trusts that run more than one school – can “run and turnaround not just high performing schools but those which are struggling”, and references the troubles of the Voyager academy in his constituency.

He continues the prospect of “nationalising” education and handing down a “top down system” to a Jeremy Corbyn Labour government “fills me with horror”.

“I will not be supporting this rushed, ill thought out and flawed policy and I suspect the government will dump it before too long,” Jackson finishes.

Labour today leads an Opposition Day debate having tabled a motion claiming there is “no evidence that academisation in and of itself leads to school improvement”. The vote is not binding but could prove embarrassing for the Government.

Academies are state-controlled but free of local authority control.

For any school that fails to have a plan in place, the Government will take on radical new powers to intervene and ensure academy conversion takes place.

Unions have hit out at the Government was moving to “undo over 50 years of comprehensive public education at a stroke”.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/schools-academies-labour_uk_570e1011e4b01711c612ab4a

Buy your town’s community hospital from the NHS or else …

From the blog of Claire Wright, DCC Independent Councillor:

Yesterday’s BBC Good Morning Devon programme yesterday morning covered the potential fallout of NHS Property Services taking over 12 community hospitals in Devon, in June.

The community hospitals that will transfer ownership to NHS Property Services include: Axminster, Budleigh Salterton, Crediton, Exeter Community Hospital (Whipton), Exmouth, Honiton, Moretonhampstead, Okehampton, Ottery St Mary, Seaton, Sidmouth and Tiverton.

Ottery Hospital’s League of Friends members Adrian Rutter and David Roberts were interviewed expressing serious concern about the government owned company charging local NHS organisations commercial rents after acquiring them – and the possibility of the buildings being sold off if the NHS cannot afford the rents.

However, Hugo Swire seemed (after claiming such concerns were alarmist – I also wrote to him last week about this very issue) – to dismiss the idea, instead suggesting that it was up to the community to take out a lease on the buildings.

This is unbelievable. Ottery’s community raised around £250,000 to help fund a new hospital building just 20 years ago. Now the government is helping themselves to what they see as a profitable asset, charging the local NHS huge rents … and the solution… says our MP – is for the community to pay for a long term lease?

Just what planet does Mr Swire live on?

It is Mr Swire’s government that is perpetrating this plan which amounts to blatant theft and extortion. As a government minister he tells us he has considerable influence with other ministers and secretaries of state. It’s about time he used this influence to protect our precious hospitals for future generations.

Here’s the interview. Tune in at 39 mins to hear Adrian Rutter and David Roberts interview which precedes Mr Swire’s at 42 minutes – link – http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03nx07c

http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/hugo_swire_on_ottery_hospital_sell_off_risk_let_the_community_take_out_a_le

“The top is greedy and mean and will always find a way to take care of themselves. They always do”

We are not here in this world to find elegant solutions, pregnant with initiative, or to serve the ways and modes of profitable progress. No, we are here to provide for all those who are weaker and hungrier, more battered and crippled than ourselves. That is our only certain good and great purpose on earth, and if you ask me about those insoluble economic problems that may arise if the top is deprived of their initiative, I would answer ‘To hell with them.’ The top is greedy and mean and will always find a way to take care of themselves. They always do.”

Michael Foot
Speech before the 1983 General Election.

Report of the Rural Housing Review: “Affordable Housing: A fairer deal for Rural Communities”

As referred to on “Farming Today”‘

http://view.pagetiger.com/RHPR/issue1