Outbreak of manifestisis

“The prime minister is either an idiot or a liar. It is a difficult call for a spin doctor to make. So they went for idiot. It seemed safer.

Boris Johnson was only supposed to be churning out the “Get Brexit Done” spiel for workers at a fabrication firm (stop it) in Teesside. Instead he managed to blurt out a flagship manifesto pledge, which could cost as much as £10 billion.

He had been asked by Claire Cartlidge, a chemist: “You said low tax, do you mean low tax for people like you or low tax for people like us?”

Nice and easy one to bat away with talk of all being in it together, perhaps even a chance to tease the manifesto. Instead Johnson replied: “I mean low tax for working people. If you look at what we are doing and what I said in the last few days, we are going to be cutting national insurance up to £12,000.”

Klaxons. Sirens. Heads in hands. Glass smashed in emergency. Spin doctors, fresh from an earlier visit to a washing machine factory, were in a spin.

Had the prime minister accidentally scooped himself by leaking his own manifesto? Was it not true and he had got it wrong? Perhaps he was a big wally who couldn’t keep his mouth zipped.

Decisions, decisions. It was definitely not deliberate, the spinning spinners spun. But the policy was true. Sort of.

A briefing note was rushed out. In fact the policy was that the threshold to start paying national insurance contributions (NICs) would rise from £8,628 a year to £9,500, with an “ambition” for it to eventually rise to £12,500. He was, it turned out, tantalisingly close to being right.

To be fair this is a hell of a policy. It means taking NICs in line with when you start paying income tax (which was raised by the coalition, a Lib Dem policy which the Tories had dismissed as unaffordable in 2010, but let’s not dwell on that).

It would mean more than two million low-paid workers being lifted out of paying NICs altogether, eventually saving people £450 a year.

Johnson was putting a brave face on it. In an interview with The Times soon after, the PM insisted that he had not blundered. “No, no, no,” he starts. “I’ve been campaigning on this for months. If you’d been paying attention during the Conservative Party leadership election it will not have been news to you.”

As Francis Elliott writes: “The drawn faces of his aides tell a different story.”

This bit of clumsiness has also had the effect of overshadowing the Labour manifesto launch today, which Tory HQ will no doubt be furious about. If they keep drip-dripping policies out ahead of Sunday’s big launch, they could dominate the news cycle for six days.

For Labour, a harder task. Everything from 2017 has to stay, pretty much. They have not had the luxury of a change of leader to ditch the duff ideas or trim the expensive ones.

Instead Jeremy Corbyn’s focus is on the messaging. He hates billionaires. Billionaires are bad. And he is good. “I accept the implacable opposition and hostility of the rich and powerful is inevitable.”

A party conference policy to make the UK carbon neutral by 2030 will be watered down, but the BBC is reporting there will be a windfall tax on oil companies.

Corbyn will vow to press ahead with increasing the tax on the richest, raising the minimum wage to £10 an hour, building millions of homes, tackling climate change and nationalising the rail, mail, water and energy firms.

“And here’s a brand new one: I accept the implacable opposition of the private internet providers because we’re going to give you the very fastest full fibre broadband for free. That’s real change.”

The problem is that voters don’t think he will. New polling by James Johnson, the Downing Street pollster 2017-19, shows that voters don’t believe Corbyn will actually deliver on his flagship promises if he becomes PM.

It showed that only 13 per cent of people think that the promise of a four-day working will ever happen, and only 15 per cent think that the UK could have net zero carbon emissions by 2020, a policy that has been hotly debated in the party.

Just a quarter think that the free broadband policy will be delivered or that a scheme to give 10 per cent of the shares in every company to their workers will happen.

Meanwhile, over in Libdemland Jo Swinson is promising to legalise cannabis when she becomes prime minister. (It is not clear if the two claims are connected.) She unveiled the Lib Dem manifesto yesterday with pledges to stop Brexit, tax frequent flyers and launch a £130 billion capital investment programme. (The Times’s Oliver Wright unpacks the policies, and how they compared to previous manifestos, here:

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/lib-dem-manifesto-explained-jo-swinson-s-key-policies-compared-to-previous-pledges-5js6prc7p?

So we have a prime minister making promises when he isn’t supposed to, a wannabe prime minister making promises that voters don’t think he can keep and a never-gonna-be prime minister making promises nobody expects her to have to honour.

Manifestitis comes in many forms. Symptoms include a rash of promises, verbal diarrhoea and delusion. A cure is not expected for another three weeks.”

Source: Red Box (Times)

“Leaders’ election TV debate cancelled after Boris Johnson refuses to take part”

Chicken – AND he’s refused to appear at the husting in his constituency!

Frit!

“A planned leaders’ debate between Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn has been cancelled after the prime minister refused to take part.

The Channel 4 debate, which was scheduled for Sunday, would have been the second direct clash between Mr Johnson and the Labour leader after a contest on ITV this week.

But despite agreement from Labour, a producer announced on Thursday evening that the programme had been cancelled just days before it was supposed to air.

“Gutted we’ve had to cancel a planned Leaders debate on Channel 4 for this Sunday. Jeremy Corbyn had agreed to take part but, after many weeks of intense discussion, we were unable to secure agreement from Boris Johnson team,” said Channel 4 producer Louisa Compton.

Channel 4 News anchor Krishnan Guru-Murthy, who would have presented the debate, added: “Boris Johnson said he was in favour of debates and his team have been in detailed talks with us for weeks about format and rules right up until yesterday.

“They insisted they were engaged and wanted to take on Jeremy Corbyn on our channel. Corbyn said yes. Offer still stands.”

It comes as the Labour candidate in Mr Johnsons’s seat said the prime minister was ducking out of a local hustings event there, leading it to be cancelled as well.

Ali Milani tweeted: “Name any time that works for you. My team will organise the venue, details and all logistics. All you have to do is show up. Show an ounce of integrity. Come debate me. What do you have to worry about?”

Channel 4 says it will still hold a live debate on 8 December featuring “representatives” of seven major parties taking questions from an audience of undecided voters. The politicians would be questions about everything except Brexit.

Another head-to-head clash is expected to take place on the BBC on Friday 6 of December, with Question Time specials planned for this Friday and further events potentially in the pipeline.”

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/election-debate-boris-johnson-party-leaders-tv-cancel-corbyn-a9212926.html

AND YET MORE TORY DIRTY TRICKS AND FAKE NEWS!

“The Conservative Party has bought a website called “labourmanifesto.co.uk” and are using it to attack the opponent party on the day of their manifesto launch.

The website, which some commentators suggest may appear to be an official Labour Party domain, has appeared at the top of some people’s Google search results as a paid advertisement. …”

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/general-election-labour-manifesto-conservative-17293310

Fake news – Tories at it AGAIN!

Tory HQ Has Been Accused Of Misleading People On Twitter – Again:

“A video appears to show Jess Phillips criticising Labour’s new manifesto – but she isn’t.

The Conservative Party has been accused of misleading voters again on social media, this time by tweeting a video of Labour candidate Jess Phillips with the wrong date on it.

The edited video, posted by the @CCHQPress Twitter account and now deleted, showed the parliamentary candidate saying: “You can never, ever deliver all of those things that you are pretending to deliver when you go to the electorate.”

@CCHQPress has dated the video November 21, 2019, giving the impression Phillips was criticising Jeremy Corbyn on the same day he launched Labour’s general election manifesto.

But the clip has been taken from an old interview, when Phillips appeared on ITV’s Good Morning Britain on October 3 to promote her new book.

The video was reaired this morning during an interview with shadow education secretary Angela Rayner.

During the original interview, Phillips was questioned by Susanna Reid about keeping manifesto promises — before the general election was announced.

Phillips said: “I think there is an argument to be said that you can never, ever deliver all of those things that you are pretending to deliver when you go to the electorate.

“In reality, things change. Globally things change, situations change. Facts change.

″[We can’t deliver it] in all cases. I can’t control the trade war between America and China and I have to, each and every day, and at the moment it is on a day-by-day basis and it is not good, and I have to say: ‘What is the best thing, the best decision I can make today to make sure my constituents are better off?’”

The video also labels Phillips a “Corbyn ally” – in reality, the 37-year-old candidate for Birmingham Yardley has been a vocal critic of the Labour leader in the past, going as far as to say he wasn’t the “practical choice” for leader because people would not vote for him.

The edited video has been criticised on Twitter.

One person said: “You know she’s not just talking about Labour right, but all politicians? She’s speaking truth whereas you only pretend to use facts.”

Another added: “Edited and old. Get a grip.”

It’s not the first time the Tories have been accused of misleading the public with a video.

The same Twitter account came under fire just this week after it rebranded itself as “FactCheckUK” during Tuesday evening’s televised leaders’ debate.

The @CCHQPress page normally carries clear Tory branding and logos and is equally clearly named.

But as Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn went head-to-head on Tuesday, the account renamed itself “FactCheckUK” and minimised any references to Conservative Campaign Headquarters (CCHQ).

Twitter warned that a repeat of the incident would result in “decisive corrective action”.

On November 5, they were accused of unfairly editing a video of Labour’s Sir Keir Starmer, to make him appear unable to answer a question on Brexit. However, the party stood by the edit, PA Media reports.

The Tories have also purchased the website labourmanifesto.co.uk.

The website purports to showcase Labour’s manifesto but instead actually attacks the party’s policies. It accuses the party of promising “higher taxes” with “no plan for Brexit”.

The Conservatives came under fire for rebranding as a “fact-checking service” during Tuesday night’s televised election debate.

Twitter and the Conservative Party did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the video.”

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/tory-hq-twitter-jess-phillips_uk_5dd69210e4b010f3f1d3a842

Manifestos here, manifestos there …

“Experts say Tory tax plans will mostly benefit wealthier people, as minister faces derision for saying government ‘not to blame’ for poverty.”

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-news-live-general-election-brexit-polls-labour-manifesto-latest-a9211656.html

AND

“IFS rejects Labour’s claim 95% taxpayers would not pay extra for its plans”

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2019/”nov/21/general-election-2019-corbyn-to-launch-labours-manifesto-of-hope-live-news?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

AND

“Lib Dem manifesto spending analysed: Eye-watering sums for young families but what about pensioners?”

https://www.itv.com/news/2019-11-20/lib-dem-manifesto-spending-analysed-eye-watering-sums-for-young-families-but-what-about-pensioners/

Maybe try here – where they are all compared!

Click to access Carl%20Emmerson%2C%202017%20General%20Election%2C%20manifesto%20analysis.pdf

“Young people who have turned 18 since 2026 could decide this election”

“It’s up to young people to mobilise in this election. Labour has entered no electoral pacts; meanwhile, the Brexit Party has happily given one to the Tories. Sensible politics has been replaced by a singularly narrow focus on Brexit, with desperately needed policy debate on preventing climate breakdown sidelined, and no one seeming to care that it’s young people who will pay the price. The so-called adults won’t save us. We have to save ourselves. ….”

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/general-election-tactical-voting-young-people-register-brexit-a9211936.html

If you want to be a decider (of any age) go here:

https://www.gov.uk/register-to-vote

before 26 November

It takes lessthan 5 minutes.

Tories not to blame for poverty under a Tory government says Tory Minister Priti Patel

“The Conservatives have come under fire after a senior minister gave a disastrous interview claiming the government was “not to blame” for poverty.

Labour said the comments from Priti Patel, the home secretary, were another example of the “cruelty” of the Tory government, in a fresh blow to Boris Johnson’s election efforts.

It comes as the Conservatives complained about an interview Michael Gove gave to Channel 4, where the top Tory accused the broadcaster of political bias.”

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-news-live-general-election-bexit-polls-labour-manifesto-latest-a9211656.html

Note: this comes after news that Labour complained about bias at Sky where its general election set had “Brexit election” plastered all over it.