Budleigh residents offer “verbal abuse” queuing on the street to get their pills

The “old dears” of Budleigh are up in arms.

Not knowing whether either of the two Lloyds pharmacies are open, then sometimes having to queue on the street in the cold to be served.

You wait weeks to get an appointment, then you wait sometimes for days to get any prescribed medication dispensed!

The dispensing of prescriptions in the town has descended into near farce, as has Simon Jupp’s reaction, see below. 

Residents in Budleigh struggling with ‘poor’ pharmacy service

Residents in Budleigh Salterton are struggling to collect prescribed medications due to staff shortages at the two Lloyds pharmacies in Budleigh High Street.

Adam Manning www.exmouthjournal.co.uk 

For the past year, both the Lloyds Pharmacy have been opening with restricted hours. There are occasions when one or other pharmacy is open but sometimes customers have to queue outside the shop.

Sue Lake, chairman of the local Patients Participation Group, (PPG) said: “We have been pressing Lloyds, the NHS and other stakeholders for the past twelve months because the PPG is concerned about patients and whether or not Lloyds are meeting the terms of their two dispensing licenses.

“The PPG continues to be involved in continuing NHS discussions but the current situation of having to queue outside the shop to wait to be served on the pavement is just not appropriate, especially, with the onset of winter.”

 A spokesman for Lloyds Pharmacy said: “Verbal abuse from customers is cited as a contributing factor to three managers leaving over two months. The pharmacies have not been able to be open every day because there is a national shortage of locum pharmacists and also, they have not been able to recruit and train retail staff.”

Many residents of Budleigh and surrounding villages are moving their prescriptions to pharmacies in Exmouth, some offer a delivery service. However, the PPG believe that the best option would be for our town to have two pharmacies which are trusted and reliable to provide a much-needed dispensing service.

Chris Kitson, member of the PPG, told the Journal: “The lack of reliable trading hours are very worrying to residents who make a journey to Town to collect their medication only to find the shops closed or that their medications are not available as the staff have not had time to unpack the deliveries from the Lloyds central warehouse near Bristol. This unacceptable level of service is also placing our Medical Centre under additional strain as they have to deal with patient requests to try and help them obtain their medications.”

“The PPG fail to see why Lloyds insist upon running two pharmacies in the town, surely it would make sense to run one business effectively rather than two very poor There is little evidence of resource management or support to the clearly over stretched staff. The strain their staff are under is unfair as they are in the front line trying to achieve the impossible.”

Residents who wish to complain about the service email customer services@lloydspharmacy.co.uk or england.contactus@nhs.net starting the email with I wish to complain.

Simon Jupp’s reaction (to be contrasted with Richard Foord’s on unacceptable GP appointment waiting times)

Here is how Simon Jupp reacted a couple of weeks ago in his weekly press release:

First he outlines the problem

I have received quite a few emails recently about local pharmacies being closed at short notice or with long queues outside stores.

The problem has been particularly acute in Budleigh Salterton. I recently met with LloydsPharmacy, who run branches in the town and across East Devon.

He expresses shock at the issues raised, but they are not the ones that immediately spring to mind

I will be honest that the issues raised in the meeting really shocked me. Verbal abuse from customers has been cited as a contributing factor to three managers leaving a store in Budleigh over two months. Sadly, stores haven’t been able to open every day because there’s a national shortage of qualified staff and locum pharmacists and dispensers are not always available to make up the shortfall.

Pharmacies can’t dispense medicines without a pharmacist on site. Recruitment remains a struggle despite the offer of generous hourly rates and bonuses. The government has added pharmacists to the shortage occupation list to help recruitment from elsewhere. Training can take up to five years, depending on the role.

He recognises frustration with the “service” then passes the buck

I recognise that many of us will be frustrated when we don’t get the service we expect. But there’s no excuse to verbally abuse staff who are just doing their jobs. LloydsPharmacy assure me they are working hard to recruit new staff and will keep me updated with their progress.

Lastly, he indulges in a classic Tory diversionary and gratuitous attack on EDDC 

I have also received emails from residents concerned about the continued closure of Exmouth Town Hall and Blackdown House in Honiton. East Devon District Council closed both offices at the start of the pandemic with no firm plans announced to reopen them. It prompted several political groups to work cross-party on an open letter to the council calling for both offices to reopen. Funnily enough, I hear the leader was informed of the letter on Thursday and wasn’t best pleased, as you might possibly be able to tell from his column this week. It prompted a press release on Friday announcing that Exmouth Town Hall will reopen in December.

The time has come to also reopen their offices at Honiton for face-to-face support for visitors who turn up and may need help. It’s what council tax payers expect.

Bottom line: he fails to address the issue – another example of the broken NHS – Owl

Devon being ‘let down’ over GP appointment waiting times

Richard Foord MP comments on GP appointment waiting times.

To be contrasted with Simon Jupp MP’s approach to the additional problem the “old dears” in Budleigh are complaining of, their long wait in getting their medication dispensed. Not knowing if either of the two pharmacies are open, then sometimes having to queue in the cold outside. – Owl 

Lewis Clarke www.devonlive.com

A Devon MP has said people are being let down after revealing the ‘alarming number’ of patients waiting more than two weeks to see a GP. More than 140,000 patients across Devon waited more than two weeks to see a GP in September, new research by the Liberal Democrats has revealed.

This made up 20.2 per cent of all GP appointments, up from the 13.6 per cent of patients who waited more than two weeks to see their doctor in January. Across the country, over 5 million people waited more than two weeks for a GP appointment in September, making up 17.9 per cent of all GP visits.

Richard Foord MP has said the “alarming figures” show that patients in Tiverton & Honiton are being let down. It comes as Liberal Democrats have set out plans for patients to have a right to see their GP within a week, or within 24 hours if in urgent need.

The policy would enshrine this right in the NHS Constitution, putting a duty on the government and health service to make sure it happens. It would be achieved by increasing the number of GPs, fixing pension rules to prevent so many doctors retiring early, and increasing the number of nurses and pharmacists fully qualified to prescribe day to day medicines. The proposals were announced by Liberal Democrat Leader Ed Davey on a visit to Axminster Medical Practice this month.

Mr Foord said: “These alarming figures show our local health services are being run into the ground under this Conservative government. Behind these statistics are people across our part of Devon waiting for an appointment with worrying symptoms, with many are being seen too late. Visiting Axminster Medical Practice, I saw first-hand just how hard staff are working to support local people. The whole team are working flat out and their focus on same-day appointments is making a difference. However, it’s clear they’re overstretched.

“That’s why I am proud that Liberal Democrats have put forward a credible plan to ease the pressure on GP services and ensure everyone is seen within one week. It would serve to save our local health services and finally give people across our communities the fair deal they deserve. The government’s promises become ring hollow. The sad truth is they’re disinterested in improving our NHS and refuse to take action to pull it back from the brink. People here in Devon will pay the price if this government continues to take us for granted and sit on their hands”.

Sunak tries to pacify Brexiters but keeps door open to closer EU ties

Rishi Sunak has kept open the door to closer ties with the European Union but tried to pacify angry Brexiters in his own party by laying down a red line that the UK must remain free to set its own standards and regulation.

Aubrey Allegretti www.theguardian.com 

The UK prime minister tried to dampen down speculation that senior government figures were considering a “Swiss-style” deal with Brussels, which would require alignment, at least temporarily, on food and agriculture standards.

Reports of such a move riled senior members of the European Research Group of Conservative Brexiters and the health secretary, Steve Barclay, leading to an official denial being issued by Downing Street on Sunday afternoon.

Addressing the clamour for the first time, Sunak sought to stress his credentials as someone who campaigned for leave in the 2016 referendum, and talked up the need to unleash the “enormous benefits and opportunities” of Brexit.

He told business leaders at the annual Confederation of British Industry conference in Birmingham: “Under my leadership, the United Kingdom will not assume any relationship with Europe that relies on alignment with EU law …

“We need regulatory regimes that are fit for the future, that ensure that this country can be leaders in those industries that are going to create the jobs and the growth of that future. And having the regulatory freedom to do that is an important opportunity of Brexit.”

Sunak did still leave open the possibility of trying to reduce trade barriers with the EU, a major problem for businesses who face increased and costly bureaucracy as well as a shortage of workers after the end of freedom of movement. He did not deny the UK was seeking a closer relationship with Brussels to solve those issues.

Though he would not be drawn on whether the government would be prepared to grant more visas for skilled workers to fix labour shortages, Sunak said he wanted to stem the number of people being smuggled across the Channel.

He suggested it was vital to “rebuild public consent” before turning to the problems with “legal migration”, and he promised to reduce the number of people arriving on small boats, but did not say by how much or by when.

“If we’re doing that then I do believe that we can … win the global race for talent. And I’m unapologetic about wanting to deliver an immigration system which is highly competitive, for the best and the brightest. And that’s what we’ll deliver.”

Earlier, the CBI boss, Tony Danker, urged Sunak to solve the deadlock over the Northern Ireland protocol and resist retaining “anti-growth” barriers.

Danker said: “People are arguing against immigration, but it’s the only thing that’s increased our growth potential since March.” He added: “Let’s be honest, we don’t have the people we need, nor do we have the productivity.”

Lord Price, a former Tory trade minister who served immediately before and after the 2016 referendum, said that around that time he went to Switzerland “to try and understand how the Swiss over 30 years had built a relationship with the EU where they were in the single market but they still had sovereignty over their own law-making”.

He told BBC Radio 4: “I’ve always felt that if we weren’t going to rejoin the EU or become a member of the EEA, which means that we would have to adopt again all EU legislation, the Swiss model was the right way for us to go forward.”

Price said Switzerland had 120 bilateral agreements with the EU, built over 30 years, but he added: “To get to that you’ve got to start with a good relationship with the EU. We’ve got to stop being a noisy neighbour and we’ve got to start being a cooperative neighbour.”

Don’t worry – Simon will fix it!

UK restaurants are going bust at a faster rate than during the Covid crisis owing to a “toxic mix” of surging energy costs, staff shortages and falling bookings.

Championing the hospitality sector is Simon Jupp’s big mission, despite the fact that not until the “New Guard” took charge, did East Devon have a Tourism strategy.

So far he’s not been very effective. Amongst the mini budget reversals announced in the emergence statement, Jeremy Hunt cut the previously announced freeze on alcohol duty.

Simon is a bit of a flip-flopper, supporting Liz Truss’ unfunded tax breaks one week then Rishi Sunak’s austerity 2.0++ the next.

Kalyeena Makortoff http://www.theguardian.com 

Closures in the sector rose by 60%, with 1,567 insolvencies over 2021-22, up from 984 during 2020-21, according to a study by the advisory firm Mazars. The figure includes 453 over the past three months, up from 395 in the previous quarter.

“Insolvencies of restaurant businesses are now happening at a far faster rate than during Covid,” Rebecca Dacre, a partner at Mazars, said. “It is a very toxic mix of rising input costs, sharply rising finance costs and weak demand. Most restaurateurs have not seen this combination of negative factors before.”

Industry lobby groups including UK Hospitality and the British Beer and Pub Association said last month that more than a third of hospitality businesses could go bust by early 2023.

While the industry experienced a rebound in business this summer after a string of forced closures during Covid lockdown periods, restaurants are now struggling with surging inflation, which has not only increased the cost of energy, food and drinks, but meant their customers have less money to spend on going out.

Barclaycard recently reported that more than half of Britons were planning to cut down on essential spending, raising concerns about revenues from the Christmas period, when many businesses make the bulk of their profits.

Some firms are also struggling to recruit enough employees as post-Brexit rules on migration block EU citizens from working in the UK. This has contributed to higher wage inflation.

Mazars said the combined pressures were likely to spell a tough few months for the industry, despite the usually lucrative holiday period.

“The Christmas trading period is usually a bumper period for hospitality businesses. However, restaurants will be bracing themselves for a very tough winter and many face a real battle to keep afloat,” Dacre said. “There’s a certainty of further insolvencies if they don’t receive much more support from the government, but the chances of the government fully turning on the taps is low.”

Planning applications validated by EDDC for week beginning 7 November

Numbers of second homes in Devon continue to soar. East Devon second only to South Hams

2687 in East Devon one in every 23 properties!

Is this the market we are sacrificing green fields for? – Owl

Parts of Devon have the highest rates of second homes in the country. A total of 13,363 properties in Devon are classed as second homes, according to new research by Action on Empty Homes – an 11.2 per cent increase compared to 2021, when there were 12,019 such properties.

David Dubas-Fisher www.devonlive.com

These are homes that are unlived in, but are fully furnished. The numbers also include holiday lets like AirBnBs as well as “buy-to-leave” properties, which are purchased as investments that are left unoccupied in the expectation that their value will rise.

South Hams has the highest number of any local authority in the region, with a total of 3,947 – and 14.2 per cent increase from last year. It means that one in every 11 properties in South Hams is now either a second home or a long-term empty homes, the 4th highest rate in England.

Some 8.6 per cent of properties in the area are classed as second homes. Only the City of London (22.3 per cent), North Norfolk (9.8 per cent) and the Isles of Scilly (8.7 per cent) rank higher. East Devon has seen a 14.4 per cent increase in second homes in the past

In North Devon the rate of second homes or of long-term empty homes – a property that has been empty for more than six months, and doesn’t have a statutory exemption from council tax – is one in every 21 properties, while in East Devon it’s one in every 23, in Torridge it’s one in every 24, and in West Devon it’s one in every 34.

There are 3,828 LTEHs in our county according to Action on Empty Homes’ research. That’s up from 2,987 in 2021, an increase of 28.2 per cent.

Chris Bailey National Campaign Manager for Action on Empty Homes said: “After more than a decade of intense housing crisis it is shocking to see long-term empty homes in England rise to 257,331 – another 20,000 more wasted empties, while nearly 100,000 families are trapped in Temporary Accommodation, costing the nation one and a half billion pounds a year. This is good money wasted on often extremely poor quality housing. Homeless families need genuinely affordable lifetime homes.

“A new national empty homes programme is long overdue – the government needs to step up to the plate and offer funding and incentives to get these homes back into use. Long-term empties are a huge missed opportunity to invest in green retrofit and create new jobs.

“Continued growth in long-term empty homes while our housing crisis intensifies sends a clear message, we are failing to meet housing need and failing to make best use of our existing homes.”

Both West Devon and South Hams councils have declared housing a crisis. Due to a number of factors, including the lack of rented accommodation which is available for longer than six months, an excessive rise in house prices due to second home-owners, the conversion of properties to Airbnb’s and people moving into the District since the pandemic. South Hams District Council last Autumn said it has no choice but to declare a Housing Crisis.

Local Authority: Second homes 2022

South Hams: 3947

East Devon: 2687

North Devon: 1809

Teignbridge: 1320

Torridge: 1142

Plymouth UA: 1107

West Devon: 650

Exeter: 505

Mid Devon: 196

Tourism boss says we need to attract ‘friends’ not ‘effing emmets’

Tourism should be driven firstly by what the people want. it’s got to be sustainable and regenerative and not damaging.

This article is centred on Cornwall  but the message applies equally to Devon. – Owl 

Lee Trewhela www.cornwalllive.com

Although Visit Cornwall boss Malcolm Bell is retiring at the end of the year, he’s certainly not taking any prisoners. He told CornwallLive the future of tourism in the Duchy relies on attracting ‘friends’ and ‘guests’ and forgetting the ‘****ing emmets’.

In an interview with CornwallLive, he said: “In my mind, visitors fall into five unofficial categories – at one level you have friends, then you have guests, then you have tourists, then you have bloody tourists, then you have ****ing emmets. You can quote me on that. The challenge we have is to get the friends, guests and tourists, who get us. Then try and convert the bloody tourists, but forget the awkward people who are ‘why haven’t you got this?’, ‘why haven’t you got that?’ It’s about targeting the right people at the right time of year.”

Mr Bell, 67, made the comment – which he knows he’ll get in trouble for – while talking about the two summers of the pandemic, when Cornwall was swamped by tourists, many of whom were here begrudgingly because they couldn’t go abroad.

“Last year, in particular, should be a salutary note, like burning your fingers as a kid you learn not to do that again. It’s great having a good road system now but it does open us up, and the pandemic opened us up to things that were quite difficult to cope with.

“In the 1970s people were in Cornwall because they couldn’t afford a proper holiday and there were a lot of chips on shoulders, and we felt that again in those two years. It had come back around. Twenty-five years ago it was ‘the Westcountry’, 15 years ago it was ‘Devon and Cornwall’ and now ‘Cornwall’ is the Waitrose and Devon is the Sainsbury’s. We’ve really come up through. We made ourselves the place to be, but half the country went abroad. Once you stopped them going abroad, we ended up with people here who didn’t want to be here. It’s settled down again now.”

There is a certain irony that the proud Cornishman who has helmed our tourism sector, used to wear a hat bearing a slogan which wasn’t the most inviting to visitors.

He said: “My mother destroyed the photograph otherwise you could have had it, of me wearing a hat with ‘Go home emmet’ written on it. That was because in about 1976 I was walking through Falmouth and these wonderful young men from Birmingham asked me where the nearest Indian restaurant was. Naively, I answered the question correctly to the best of my knowledge at the time, which was Plymouth. That’s why there’s a dent in my nose. I think they thought I was taking the Michael. So I wasn’t very happy about visitors for a while.”

It’s fair to say that under his tenure at Visit Cornwall, since 2010, tourism in Cornwall has never been so successful … or controversial.

“People don’t like me saying this, but the rise in tourism has helped with Cornwall’s identity, not necessarily always for the good, I’ll admit that, but people know about Cornwall now. We’re not just part of the Westcountry. We’re not tagged to a strange place called Devon. I always say Devon is the nearest place to Heaven … keep going and you’ll find it, and Devon is short for Drive On.

“But now we have to tackle the problems of success. That’s why we have to learn from those two years.”

Mr Bell steps down from his post at the end of December, but will carry on in the background in a consultation role, working on a plan for regenerative and sustainable tourism. Negotiations are currently taking place to employ his successor.

He told me: “I’m finishing off a strategy and trying to get Cornwall Council to endorse it, which says that the new direction in tourism should be driven firstly by what the people of Cornwall want, the next thing is improving the jobs and career prospects, and it’s got to be sustainable and regenerative and not damaging. Even if that restricts the growth of the sector, it can stay like that for decades. If you have a year like we had before, we’ll just be busted. That’s the worst thing that can happen. There are businesses that disagree with me, most agree.

“We are lucky compared to a lot of places as we’ve got a lot of independent businesses rather than chains of multi-nationals, or businesses that are backed by venture capitalists, who want their money. Whereas down here, most people want to look after Cornwall.”

He is a passionate advocate for regenerative tourism which has the people of Cornwall at its heart.

“In ten years time, we – and I mean everyone in Cornwall including the council – should be controlling the stock and only having professional providers doing the right things, and there should be a career path for somebody who enters at base level to progress to the level they desire. We should prevent over-tourism. There should be regenerative tourism, such as businesses doing rewilding work, introducing bees, holding more community events.

“When it comes to events, the core audience should be locals first and what they want. Don’t create things just for staying visitors. That’s part of regenerative tourism, which helps the local community but still generates the money you need.”

What about that hot potato, a tourism tax?

“We’ve got to get the right balance of the cost of tourism and the cost of improving Cornwall in a fair and equitable way that is easy to administer, because we do get calls for a tourism tax. Thirty-three pence in the pound of a visitor’s spend goes to London, so in Cornwall that’s about £600-£700 million. There should be some form of mechanism to get the balance right.

“My view is why can’t there be a balance where we get 5% of all that VAT money back? At the moment when tourism booms, it’s Cornwall pain, Treasury gain. And why can’t we find mechanisms where visitors are happy to contribute? As soon as you say ‘tourism tax’, one lot cheer and one lot oppose it, and that’s not going to bring us together.”

Mr Bell believes the success of Cornwall’s tourism industry, while negating the impact it can have on those of us who live here, is to spread the visitor love outside the peak summer months.

“We would like to attract an extra 10% to 20% of people in January, February and March but no more in August. That extends the jobs we’ve got. I think the two months we’ll never crack are November and January. February you’ve got half-term, so if you get it going in March to the end of October, staff will be kept on. So full-time employment in the sector would be around nine-and-a-half months.

“That’s why we’ve got to look at what we’re calling the Cornwall Evergreen, which is culture, restaurants, the heritage, the wildlife. I know dogs on beaches is a contentious issue, but if you’ve got a dog and you want to go somewhere in the winter, sandy paws are preferable to muddy paws. There are little markets and niches. Another area is attracting the business market to do their planning and reviews between October and March, so come down and do some actual blue sky thinking.

“The new website, which will be finished before I go, is Cornwall For All Seasons and is mainly designed to say what’s best about Cornwall outside the main peak. Not being funny, but any tourist board boss normally when they get TV and film coverage in their area gets excited, but in the last two years it’s been like London buses in Cornwall. It’s the same stuff – it doesn’t feature the areas that we’d like, such as south east Cornwall. It doesn’t actually show what it’s like to live here.”

How has this year been compared to the manic summers of 2020/21, when hospitality staff were at breaking point?

“This year has been quieter than 2019, ironically – the spring was quiet and then the attractions suffered a lot because it was so warm. If it’s 19 degrees you stay on the beach for three hours, but when it’s 25 you stay on it all day, every day.

“There have been too many people thinking they could get too much money like the two years before. It did give us a reputation for being too expensive, which is ridiculous. Value for quality is one thing, but ripping people off is a completely different thing. Sensible businesses – and there are plenty of them – didn’t overegg it. You nurture a customer for life, you don’t rip them off and expect them to come back. But those who did are now the ones who are suffering.”

What would he say to people who argue Cornwall shouldn’t be so reliant on tourism?

“I’m all for it. If you get a broader economy, with other sectors in Cornwall such as the space industry, you get more people who will go out and eat and drink, and it won’t be a seasonal thing. Though I would say to anybody, I don’t know anywhere in the world that’s attractive and on the periphery and doesn’t rely in varying degrees on tourism.

“Cornwall is a really strong brand now, but we want that expanded into all the other sectors too. If we could have a more balanced economy, that would be brilliant. If tourism in its size didn’t grow, but other sectors did – what’s wrong with that?”

He believes some radical changes have to be made, such as compulsory registration for everyone offering holiday accommodation at whatever level.

“The population in Cornwall when I started working was 250,000 and now it’s 550,000, which is why we’re pushing for compulsory registration and, I think the next thing is, planning permission if you’re going to rent out your property as a holiday let. You’ve got to be registered and have planning permission.

“I tried to bait Gordon Ramsay, but he wouldn’t take it, on Radio 5 Live. In the south of France if you’re a millionaire second home owner, you’re persuaded to buy a couple of houses to rent for local people. I tried to bait Gordon Ramsay into agreeing to buy a couple of houses to rent to up-and-coming chefs. We could do with a bit more of that philanthropic balance.”

Mr Bell, whose family go back centuries in Cornwall, said of his retirement: “A couple of years ago I was thinking of stepping down until a strange thing called Covid came along. This year was mainly spent settling things down, but I thought I can’t hang around as there will be another crisis in a minute … and there is one.”

He was brought up on Malabar estate in Truro, with one set of grandparents living on the Trelander estate on the other side of the city and his other grandparents at Hendra Vean in Truro. He attended Bosvigo School and then Treyew School in the city – “I used to go sleep every afternoon and the school inspector was called to my mother, and they asked why I was going to sleep all the time, and I said no one told me I couldn’t!”

He added: “I did rubbish for a few years, failed the 11-plus, went to Penwethers Secondary Modern – which became Richard Lander, I wasn’t bright enough to go to the grammar school. I attended Camborne Tech then did nuclear physics and computing at Manchester Poly, which was partly driven by meeting a girl from the north and partly by let’s see a city.”

A career in the civil service saw him return to Cornwall in a host of jobs, including one with the sexy title of work related non advanced further education funding manager. After undertaking an economic study of tourism in Devon and Cornwall in the mid-1990s, Mr Bell got a job with the Westcountry Tourist Board, which then turned into South West Tourism, and in 2010, after council unification, he was employed as chief executive of Visit Cornwall, which after losing its Cornwall Council funding continued as a CIC.

He said: “Tourism is not a statutory responsibility – when I arrived, the budget for Visit Cornwall was £2m and they took half a million off that for the One Cornwall project and then all the austerity cuts started hitting. Understandably when it comes to social care and children, why can’t tourism look after itself as it’s a big industry? Why was the taxpayer paying for it?”

Mr Bell says it’s a difficult job and wishes his successor well. He certainly gets a bit of stick from people on social media.

“I’m glad my mum’s gone, she would have got upset, and my dad would have got angry. I was taught by my father to have acute hearing but thick skin. So I listen to it and if it’s reasonable, regardless of how it comes across, I take it on board.”

He added that Visit Cornwall has had some brilliant and bizarre complaints in recent times. “People have complained St Ives doesn’t look right because the water’s out, someone said they drove over an hour from the north coast to the south coast to find the tide was in there as well, and ‘when I came last year the beach was big but now it’s small, you should tell people that the tide comes in’.”

Mr Bell told me: “My old geography teacher used to say to us, ‘crack on or you’ll end up working in tourism’.” He’s certainly made a good crack of it, even if his teacher wouldn’t approve.

Health Secretary Refuses To Acknowledge NHS Delays Could Be Causing Deaths

Health Secretary Steve Barclay has said delays to ambulance services had created a “material risk” for patients, but did not explicitly acknowledge concerns that long waits were contributing to patient deaths.

www.politicshome.com (Sunday)

Barclay has this morning faced pressure to address urgent concerns by NHS leaders that people have died while waiting for ambulances to arrive.

Deborah Lee, chief executive of Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and Andew Cox, a senior coroner in Cornwall, have both raised the alarm in recent days about the impact of ambulance waits. According to The Sunday Times, Cox has written to Barclay outlining his damning assessment of repeated cases of patients he believes have died as a result of delays, and demanded action. 

Speaking on the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, Barclay said he was “aware” of the concerns and that he was looking at the issue “extremely closely”.  

But he repeatedly refused to acknowledge whether record-high waiting times for paramedics could be contributing to deaths.

“If there is a delay in an ambulance getting to someone in terms of unmet need, and obviously, that is a material risk,” Barclay said.

“That is why it is so important that we get the flow in terms of those handover delays. About a fifth of the delay is due to what happens in hospitals itself.

He continued: “The primary cause of the delays, the biggest factor, has been delays in domiciliary care and residential homes.

In October, only 70 per cent of patients were seen within four hours in all A&E departments, the worst performance reported since the target was introduced.

The number of people waiting for non-urgent hospital treatment also hit a record-high in September, with 7.07m on the list.

Twitter link here

Barclay told the BBC that many of the delays in the NHS were due to the effects of the pandemic, and a lack of social care places delaying the discharge of people from hospital.

He defended the government’s decision to delay plans to cap lifetime social care costs at £86,000 until 2025, despite the reform originally being intended to come into effect in 2023.

“It’s a very difficult decision to delay those reforms. We remain committed to them,” he said. 

“But we recognise it as an immediate issue, particularly in hospitals where we got 30,500 people who are ready to discharge, but we are not able to do so. That is having a knock on effect in areas like ambulances and the flow through hospitals.”

He highlighted that the government had pledged an extra £2.3bn for the next two years for the NHS as part of plans announced in the Autumn Statement this week.

Shadow health secretary Wes Streeting dismissed Barclay’s claims that the pandemic was a leading cause of the current delays in NHS services, and highlighted the longer-term backlog. 

“Steve Barclay back to the discredited Conservative script claiming that Conservative NHS backlogs are Covid backlogs,” Streeting tweeted on Sunday morning.

“But we went INTO the pandemic with NHS waiting lists ALREADY at a RECORD 4.5 MILLION.

“The longer the Conservatives are in power the longer patients will wait.”

Labour has pledged to significantly increase NHS staffing, paid for by abolishing non-dom tax exemption. 

Despite an increase in funding announced by Chancellor Jeremy Hunt this week, the NHS is facing unprecedented strikes this winter, with Royal College of Nursing (RCN) members going on strike for the first time.

Barclay said his “door is open” for negotiations with the RCN and other unions, whom he met with earlier this week to discuss their demands, which include better working conditions and a pay rise of 5% above inflation.

But RCN general secretary and chief executive Pat Cullen said on Thursday that those meetings had failed to solve the issues relating to the strike and were not meaningful negotiations. 

“I must not let my members, nor the public confuse these meetings for serious discussions on the issues of NHS pay and patient safety,” she said in a letter to members.

“There is only value in meeting if you wish to discuss – in formal, detailed negotiations – the issues that have caused our members to vote for strike action.”

Barclay said on Sunday that the government had “respected” the independent pay review body’s recommendations on pay, and highlighted that other areas of the public sector were having pay freezes.

Responding Barclay’s comments, the RCN’s Pat Cullen said the health secretary’s “lack of intention and inability to see the urgency of this situation will trouble every nurse”.

“Just an hour after we again urged him to come to the negotiating table to have detailed, formal discussions on pay and patient safety, he showed no signs of doing so.

“He has finally admitted what we’ve been saying about years of neglect, underinvestment and, as a result, underperformance, but that is not enough.

Cullen added that in this “key week for health and care” the sector needed ministers to “be bold and adopt a radical new position with serious investment in nursing”.

“If governments don’t follow Nicola Sturgeon’s lead in Scotland, we will announce strike dates in December for the rest of the UK,” she added.

Posh Devon hotel to create plush staff quarters with sea views

Devon’s luxury Burgh Island Hotel has bought a care home in order to transform it into some of the best staff accommodation in the UK. Korniloff care home in Bigbury-on-Sea will be converted to the tune of £500,000 into living quarters for staff, complete with large gardens, sea views and ample space for relaxation including a gym.

Daniel Clark www.devonlive.com

Korniloff will take six months to complete and will provide 22 high end ensuite double bedrooms when finished. The provision of such quality staff accommodation will ensure that Burgh continues to attract and keep the best staff; bucking the trend of some hospitality venues, which find it hard to find staff.

This is not the first project Burgh has undertaken to provide staff with accommodation. In 2018 as the hotel expanded, Burgh bought Warren Cottage in Bigbury-on-Sea to help staff who were based further away from the island. As business continued to grow, often fully booked, it was clear that additional staff accommodation was needed.

Burgh had been interested in buying Korniloff for the past few years, but it only recently became available. Korniloff was originally built as a hotel in the early part of the last century and the intention is to give staff living quarters that match those on the island.

Giles Fuchs, owner of Burgh Island Hotel, said: “Since I bought the hotel, we have always tried to provide suitable accommodation for our staff, which is challenging given its location on a tidal island, so I am delighted to announce the purchase of Korniloff. Once renovated it will allow us to provide our hard-working and highly valued staff with a very high standard of accommodation. Our success over the past few years would not have been possible without them so it is very much deserved.

“South Hams is very expensive both in terms of rent and house prices, which makes it difficult for people to pursue a career in hospitality at the Burgh Island Hotel. Through providing quality accommodation, we hope to attract and retain the best hospitality talent to help give them a good quality of life and ensure that our guest enjoy the best experience while staying with us.”

At the height of summer, when over six million tourists flock to Devon’s magnificent coast, Burgh employs almost 100 members of staff to run, maintain and deliver its first-class service to guests throughout the hotel. In return the Burgh’s owners want to make sure that the staff have equally great accommodation to look after their wellbeing and happiness.

With only 16 staff bedrooms currently on the island and, given its remote location where access is controlled by the tide, it’s important that staff can live nearby. Burgh’s purchase of Korniloff is a move to shield employees from rising house prices and increasingly unaffordable rents, allowing them to focus on their roles at the hotel and progress their careers.

In 2022, amongst the 29 local authorities in the Southwest, South Hams recorded the highest property price rise, increasing by an average of 24.3%. Average house prices are now over £400,000 as the area becomes a popular destination for second homes and summer holidays.

It comes as plans for the huge expansion of the plush Devon hotel to meet a boom in visitor numbers and make it ‘the best hotel west of the Ritz’ are still under consideration by South Hams District Council planners. The aspiration for Burgh to be the ‘best hotel west of the Ritz’, and the scheme includes developing rooftop rooms which would rank among the country’s most sought after settings, as well as provide a new bar to allow for new guests and to allow casually dressed visitors to be split from those in 1930’s costume.

Proposals for the ambitious new development have prioritised respect for the island’s unique setting, and preserve the glamour of Roaring ‘20s for guests. An additional 15 hotel rooms in addition to the 25 already would be planned to be built, as well as 11 rooms of accommodation for staff, while a Glazed extension and first floor terrace over the Pilchard Inn, with the reinstatement of the café selling Cream Teas to rear.

The hotel, built on a private island in the South Hams in 1929, is famous for its art deco design, the sea tractor that brings guests from the mainland, and former guests such as Agatha Christie and the Beatles.

Britain mulls Swiss-style ties with Brussels

Senior government figures are planning to put Britain on the path towards a Swiss-style relationship with the European Union.

The move, intended to forge closer economic ties, is likely to infuriate hardline Conservative Brexiteers.

Caroline Wheeler, Harry Yorke, Tim Shipman www.thetimes.co.uk

Jeremy Hunt, the chancellor, last week signalled that Rishi Sunak’s administration intends to break from the approach adopted by Boris Johnson and remove the vast majority of trade barriers with the bloc.

In private, senior government sources have suggested that pursuing frictionless trade requires moving towards a Swiss-style relationship over the next decade. However, they insist this would not extend to a return to freedom of movement.

“It’s obviously something the EU would never offer us upfront because they would say you are trying to have your cake and eat it but the reason I think we will get it is because it is overwhelmingly in the businesses interests on both sides,” one said.

Switzerland has access to the European single market through a series of bilateral agreements.

However, the model also involves more liberal EU migration, and payments to the EU budget, with the bloc in recent years also pushing for the European Court of Justice to have greater oversight in the relationship. The Swiss have frequently debated restricting free movement from the bloc, but in the most recent referendum opted to keep it.

These are all red lines for members of the rebellious European Research Group.

It was also an approach that Johnson and Lord Frost, his chief Brexit negotiator, ruled out when they drew up the UK’s negotiating mandate in 2020.

Ministers are confident that the EU’s approach to relations with the UK is thawing as the continent faces the challenges caused by soaring inflation and the conflict in Ukraine.

“I think we will be doing everything we can proactively within our power to make changes to improve things when it comes to the EU,” one source said.

“The bigger picture on this is the EU seeing something which they weren’t expecting, which is massive support for European security from the UK with respect to Ukraine and they can see we are serious about being sensible grownups with the biggest military in Europe doing our bit.

“I think there is a very good way through this with more trust that we were ever going to have with either Boris Johnson or Liz Truss.”

The Tory Brexiteers are fiercely opposed to any move that risks returning the UK closer to the EU’s regulatory orbit.

Last night Frost said: “Any approach requiring the UK to align with EU rules to get trade benefits, whether as part of a Swiss-style approach or any other, would be quite unacceptable. Boris Johnson and I fought very hard to avoid any such requirements in 2020 and ensure the UK could set its own laws, and we should not contemplate giving this away in future.”

Speaking on Radio 4’s Today programme earlier this week, Hunt rejected the prospect of rejoining the single market but backed working to strengthen Britain’s relationship with Brussels.

He said: “I think having unfettered trade with our neighbours and countries all over the world is very beneficial to growth. I have great confidence that over the years ahead we will find, outside the single market, we are able to remove the vast majority of the trade barriers that exist between us and the EU.”

One rebel said they feared “unfettered trade” sounded eerily similar to the ill-fated Chequers deal drawn up by Theresa May in 2018.

The Labour Party, while ruling out rejoining the single market and customs union, have stated there are elements of Johnson’s Brexit deal that can be “fixed.” This includes a veterinary agreement with Brussels – helping to smooth issues with the Northern Ireland Protocol – and a deal which would see both sides recognise one another’s professional qualifications.

There are also mounting concerns in the ERG that the government is preparing to give ground to Brussels to resolve the disagreement over the Northern Ireland protocol.

Insiders have said a deal could see the EU drop most of its checks on goods passing between Great Britain and Northern Ireland if the UK takes a less ideological position on the role of the European Court of Justice in Northern Ireland.

But doing so would lead the group to try to “bring down the government”, warned one senior member.

The Brexiteers Chris Heaton-Harris and Steve Baker are ministers in the Northern Ireland Office and are working on a deal with Brussels.

But it is understood that warnings have been sent to Downing Street that it is the EU, not the UK, which must give ground on the ECJ. Similar warnings have been passed to the German embassy.

“Just because people like Mark Francois have not been going on about the ECJ does not mean that they have changed their view,” said an informed source. “They would rather bring down the government than accept the supremacy of a foreign court over any territory of the UK.”

A Downing Street source said Sunak was “taking the fight” to the EU but was also hopeful that a more constructive approach on both sides could bear fruit.

“Rishi wants to get this sorted as quickly as possible; there’s definitely a deal to be done,” a No 10 source said. “It’s our team’s sense that there is much more of a landing zone, in terms of what we would be happy with, than there has ever been.”

But they added: “He’s taking the fight to them. He’s not going to be giving up stuff that he and the party would not be happy with him giving up.”

Keir Starmer: I will abolish House of Lords to ‘restore trust in politics’

Keir Starmer will abolish the House of Lords and replace it with a new elected chamber as part of plans to “restore trust in politics”, the Observer understands.

Michael Savage www.theguardian.com 

In a sweeping constitutional overhaul, the Labour leader has told the party’s peers that he wants to strip politicians of the power to make appointments to the Lords as part of the first-term programme of a Labour government. Starmer said that the public’s faith in the political system had been undermined by successive Tory leaders handing peerages to “lackeys and donors”.

It is understood that Labour will hold a consultation on the composition and size of a new chamber as well as immediate reforms to the current appointments process. Final proposals will be included in the party’s next election manifesto.

It comes after a series of rows over peerages. Boris Johnson made a number of controversial appointments, including his friend Evgeny Lebedev, who owns the Evening Standard. He is expected to appoint political allies and junior aides as part of a forthcoming list.

Meanwhile, Liz Truss is also said to be planning a resignation list of new peers despite a disastrous leadership that lasted just seven weeks.

In a meeting last week, Starmer told Labour peers that there was now strong support for reform of the Lords, both across party lines and among the public. He outlined “some very clear principles” for reform, including that any new chamber should be elected by voters rather than appointed by politicians.

“I want to be clear that we do need to restore the trust of the public in every part of the United Kingdom in our system of government,” he said. “House of Lords reform is just one part of that … People have lost faith in the ability of politicians and politics to bring about change – that is why, as well as fixing our economy, we need to fix our politics.”

He added that it should be “truly representative” of the UK’s nations and regions, meaning it should have a clear role in safeguarding devolution. However, he also said that his proposals would ensure it should not replace any of the functions of the House of Commons, remaining a second chamber charged with amending and scrutinising legislation. The Commons would retain exclusive powers over the public finances and the formation of governments.

The proposals will also set out much stronger devolved powers, as part of a review of Britain’s constitutional arrangements overseen by Gordon Brown, the former prime minister.

Starmer told party peers on Wednesday that he regarded reforming the Lords as a critical part of his agenda aimed at “promoting inclusive growth and restoring trust in politics”. While he said that they would continue to play a “vital role” in the campaign to win the next election, reform was needed to show the public that Labour would provide a fresh start after a series of Tory scandals.

He pointed to Johnson’s recent use of his power to appoint peers as showing the need for reform. He said Johnson’s plans to reward “lackeys and donors” made him the latest in a long line of Tory prime ministers who have played party politics with the Lords and ridden roughshod over the appointments system: “We should be rebuilding trust in politics, but this can’t just be an article of faith – we need to show how we will do things differently. Reforming our second chamber has to be a part of that.”

Johnson has recently handed a peerage to Michael Hintze, a leading Tory donor, and previously awarded one to Lebedev. He is now said to be planning to hand more to the ultra-loyal MPs Nadine Dorries, the former culture secretary, and Nigel Adams, a former Cabinet Office minister and longtime supporter.

Johnson’s resignation honours list, which has not yet been announced, is also said to include his advisers Ross Kempsell, 30, and Charlotte Owen, a former assistant to Johnson believed to be in her late 20s.

Starmer had pledged to abolish the Lords as part of his leadership campaign, and to “replace it with an elected chamber of regions and nations”. Doubts were later raised about his commitment to the promise after he abandoned other elements of his leadership pitch. However, it is understood he now sees reform of the Lords as necessary to demonstrate that Labour would represent a decisive change from the Conservatives.

Starmer’s comments suggest that he is backing many of the ideas drawn up by Brown’s review. It is understood to support replacing the Lords with an upper house of nations and regions. It is also said to have backed a new round of devolution, including handing new economic and taxation powers to new independent councils of the nations and for England. Brown wants local mayors to have more power over education, transport and research funding.

During the meeting with peers, Starmer also made clear that he wanted to reposition Labour as “pro-business, pro-growth and can offer Britain a bright future”, adding: “We will be out there showing the public that there is a different way to this failed Tory economics … Britain has so much potential. Labour will harness it so we can lead the world again.

Labour has already announced that Starmer backs banning MPs from carrying out paid consultancy work as a way of improving ethical standards. He would also replace the ministerial code with an updated code of conduct. The party’s plans appear to include an entirely elected second chamber, but the details of the reforms have not yet been agreed.

The last big attempt to reform the Lords came under the coalition government led by David Cameron. Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader and deputy prime minister, eventually had to abandon the plans in the wake of a humiliating Tory rebellion. His proposals would have seen 80% of peers elected and the total number of members cut to 450.

Simon Jupp supports Chancellor’s Autumn Statement (would he do otherwise?)

Rejoice, rejoice, just rejoice at the news!

Be grateful that our fourth Chancellor in three months has ensured that the economy is just totally Sunakered and not completely Trussterfucked. (To quote loosely from two sources).

Our PPS’s enthusiasm for swinging in behind the Tory economic wrecking-ball shows no bounds. – Owl

Simon Jupp MP has backed tax rises and other measures revealed in Chancellor Jeremy Hunt’s Autumn Statement on Thursday (17 November).

The East Devon MP previously supported major tax cuts in former chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng’s mini-budget in September.

exmouth.nub.news

Mr Jupp described the decisions in the Autumn Statement, which also include spending cuts, as “tough but fair” and they would “restore economic stability and tackle inflation.”

He said in a statement: “Like many countries around the world, the UK is facing profound economic challenges – Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine and the Covid pandemic have cost our country billions.

“I wanted to touch on some of the headline matters today, based on the issues raised with me in recent constituency surgeries and correspondence.

“The state pension will rise in line with inflation – 10.1 per cent. I have repeatedly emphasised with the Prime Minister and Chancellor the importance of restoring the triple lock to help protect pensioners’ spending power because it offers vital economic security for many people in East Devon.

“The standard minimum income guarantee in pension credit will also increase in line with inflation from April 2023. Additionally, I also spoke with the Chancellor regarding benefits. Today, he announced that working age and disability benefits will rise by inflation, supporting the most vulnerable. 

“I am particularly pleased to learn that there will now be £4.4 billion of additional funding for schools over the next two years. I have spoken with several East Devon school heads in recent weeks to raise their concerns about recruitment and funding with the Secretary of State for Education. The extra money will help schools locally and I will continue to work with education leaders across East Devon.

“I know there has been some uncertainty about the government’s energy bill support beyond April 2023. We now know that the government will extend the energy price guarantee for twelve months until April 2024, although at a higher level of £3,000 per year for the average household. This will come alongside direct support for 8 million low-income households. 

“The government will also double to £200 the level of support for households that use heating oil and liquified petroleum gas to heat their homes. Many residents in particularly rural parts of East Devon told me the £100 initially announced some months ago wasn’t enough. I agreed and made the case for an increase.

“I believe it’s right that those with more contribute more. Two policies stand out in this regard: the point at which the highest earners start paying the top rate of tax will be lowered from £150,000 to £125,140; and energy firms will pay an expanded windfall tax of 35%, up from the 25% already levied on their profits. 

“Thanks to the action taken today, our borrowing costs are broadly back in line with comparable countries. Although we will now see some tax increases, the Chancellor has not raised headline rates of taxation, and tax as a percentage of GDP will increase by just 1% over the next five years. 

“Today’s Autumn Statement protects those on the lowest income, restores economic stability, and tackles inflation.”

 

Jeremy Hunt put vital social care reforms on hold – and failed Britain’s most vulnerable people 

Andrew Dilnot is warden of Nuffield College, Oxford, and was chair of the Commission on the Funding of Care and Support www.theguardian.com 

Dementia. Chronic lung disease or arthritis. Loss of mobility, sight, hearing. These are all things that could hit any of us, make us vulnerable and require compassion and social care. The chancellor said his statement on Thursday was about protecting vulnerable people and displaying the value of compassion. So how can a part of that statement have been yet another occasion when social care has been put at the bottom of the list of priorities?

I chaired the commission appointed by the coalition government in 2010 to suggest a way forward. My name was read out in Jeremy Hunt’s statement on Thursday, which breached the 2019 manifesto promise to “fix social care” by delaying the improved funding system I recommended from October 2023 to a (post-general election) date of October 2025.

In September 2021, the then government announced a package of changes to social care funding. There were three main elements. First, an increase in the generosity of the means-tested system, so that instead of needing to be down to your last £23,250 (including property) before you got any help from the state, you would get state help if your assets were worth less than £100,000. Second, a change to the way care is charged for, which would end individual care users subsidising local authorities. And third, a cap on the lifetime amount that you would have to pay, which meant that for the first time ever, the risk of needing social care would be pooled across the whole of society rather than borne by whoever happened to be hit. It would have moved our treatment of people with social care needs closer to the way we deal with medical needs in the NHS.

Since then, hundreds of thousands of families in vulnerable and difficult circumstances have been looking forward to October next year. The announcement on Thursday broke the pledge in the manifesto, and laid out in parliament, and now these families are being told they will have to wait until October 2025. Without these reforms, individuals and families facing the possibility of long social care journeys are left entirely on their own, with the state only helping once their assets – including their homes – have dwindled down to the threshold.

This is not the first time those needing social care have been let down. When Labour came to power in 1997 it pledged to address social care funding reform. There was a royal commission, but nothing happened. The 2010 coalition government set up an independent commission, which I chaired, and which reported in 2011. We recommended reforms similar in structure to those that have now been deferred, albeit with the cap set at a lower level. In 2013, the government legislated, with implementation due in April 2017. Before the 2015 election, the implementation date was brought forward to 2016. Immediately after the 2015 election, it was deferred by a year and then abandoned. Nothing happened.

Then there was a plan for a green paper. Nothing happened. Then there was a plan in the 2017 manifesto, which was abandoned during the campaign. Nothing happened. Then there was another plan for a green paper. Nothing happened. Then Boris Johnson on his first day in office said he had a plan. There was the 2021 announcement, followed by legislation agreed by both houses of parliament and an implementation date of October 2023. Hope grew. If this latest announcement is not reversed, we will again have a whole parliament during which … nothing will have happened.

The way we treat those in need of social care is a strong indicator of how we care about the most vulnerable people. This group has been denied the sharing of risk that we apply most strikingly in the National Health Service, but also through our wider social security system. Just over a year ago, a promise was made to these people by the prime minister. To break that promise now is not only backing out of protecting vulnerable people, but it’s also taking away something on which they were relying.

This is a time for looking to the founding of the modern British welfare state and asking why the principles that apply across so much of it are not applied to social care. In 1943 Winston Churchill said that he and his colleagues were strong partisans of national insurance “for all classes for all purposes from the cradle to the grave”, recognising that social insurance brings “the magic of averages to the rescue of the millions”. That Churchillian insight, shared by William Beveridge and Nye Bevan, is just as true now as it was then, and the glaring omission in our social welfare arrangements is social care. The reforms due to have been implemented next October would have begun to set that right. The delay hurts not only the most vulnerable, but also the carers, formal and informal, who help to support them. Social care is something we have to do together. Making this group wait yet again seems hard to defend. Can we really not do better than this?

Jeremy Hunt told to ‘come clean’ on economic cost of non-dom tax status

Ministers have been told to “come clean” on the economic argument behind not scrapping non-doms in the UK after the chancellor suggested he did not know how much money axing the controversial tax status would raise.

[See below Owl’s summary of the anachronistic origins in colonialism and slavery that gave rise to “non-dom” status. It was specifically introduced to shelter foreign property owners from swinging taxes introduced to pay the national debt in 1799. The status remains unique to the UK.]

Kate Devlin www.independent.co.uk

Jeremy Hunt insists the economy would not be helped by scrapping the status, saying on Friday that he would rather the super rich “stayed… and spent their money here”.

And he said he was told by Treasury officials that they were “very unsure” about how much money the move would actually make.

Labour has now called on ministers to publish figures on how many non-doms there are and the amount the Treasury loses because of the loophole.

The highly-respected Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) think tank told The Independent the “best estimate” it had was that abolishing the measure would be worth around £3 billion a year.

The figure is roughly the same amount as Mr Hunt announced will be added to next year’s NHS budget.

The Independent revealed earlier this year that Rishi Sunak’s wife, Akshata Murty, held non-domicile status while her husband was chancellor.

Mr Sunak called the reports about his wife “unpleasant smears” at the time, though she ultimately gave up the advantage.

The issue was seen as so toxic that insiders initially believed it scuppered Mr Sunak’s hopes of becoming prime minister.

The lawful status can save an individual from paying UK tax on income from dividends from foreign investments, rental payments on property overseas or bank interest.

Making the call for the government to produce figures on non-doms, shadow chief secretary to the Treasury Pat McFadden said: “As the Tories raise taxes on working people, it simply isn’t right that those at the top can benefit from outdated non-dom tax perks.

“If you make Britain your home you should pay your taxes here.”

He said Labour would ensure “people who make the UK their home will contribute to this country by paying tax on their global income”.

Labour also cited researched from the London School of Economics which alligned with the IFS and put the figure the treasury could raise as close to £3.2 billion a year.

Earlier this year, the IFS warned there was “very little evidence on the effectiveness of the non-dom regime at attracting and retaining valuable individuals”.

But Mr Hunt argued that scrapping the tax loophole as Labour has suggested would “damage the long-term attractiveness of the UK”.

He faced questions over his decision to keep the status while planning tax rises and public service cuts, which experts warned would hurt those on middle incomes especially.

The chancellor said Treasury officials did not give him solid numbers on how much abolishing or paring back non-dom status would raise.

“They said to me that they were very unsure about the figures that were being bandied around, as far as the savings were concerned,” he said.

“Like me, they wanted to be very sure they weren’t doing things that damaged the UK’s attractiveness. These are foreigners who could live easily in Ireland, France, Portugal, Spain, they all have these schemes. All things being equal, I would rather they stayed here and spent their money here.”

Pushed on whether Treasury had given him a figure on how much abolishing the status would bring in, he said: “No, because we don’t agree with the figures that Labour have given.

“The Treasury did not tell me it was going to help the economy to do this, that’s why I chose not to do it.

“I’m not going to do anything that’s going to damage the long-term attractiveness of the UK, even though it gives easy shots to opposition parties, I think it would be the wrong thing to do in terms of creating jobs in the UK.”

Labour has pledged to abolish non-dom tax status and replace it with a system similar to that in Germany or Canada where temporary residents are allowed to avoid paying domestic tax on overseas earnings.

Shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves accused Mr Hunt of endorsing “tax free income for millionaires while millions face frozen tax allowances and council tax hikes”.

In an apparent reference to Mr Sunak’s household, she added: “How can he possibly claim that this is fair? He refuses to act, and I wonder why. Maybe that was the only policy that he can’t get signed off by No 10 Downing Street. I say if you make Britain your home you should pay your taxes here.”

A Treasury spokesman pointed to Mr Hunt’s comments that axing the status would be the “wrong thing to do in terms of jobs and prosperity for the United Kingdom”.

History  of “Non-Dom” status and its origins in colonialism and slavery

The “non-domicile” tax exemption regime was originally introduced in 1799 to shelter those with foreign property from the swinging taxes introduced by prime minister William Pitt the Younger.

Pitt introduced new taxes In 1786 to try to reduce the debt incurred by the American War of Independence. With the country still in debt, Pitt was also forced, in 1797,  to introduce Great Britain’s first-ever income tax. The Napoleonic wars followed almost immediately and Pitt may have seen these coming.

“Non-Dom” status, then, is an echo of our colonial past. 

It is subtly different from nationality and residence and roughly equates to the concept of “homeland”. “Non-Doms” are supposed to have strong links to that “homeland” and demonstrate intent, not to remain in Britain, but to return there. A further curiosity is that you can also inherit the status from your father.

However, if eligible, you still have to make a conscious decision to claim this status. It’s a choice.

Having lost America, the aim of the perk was to keep the new colonial rich happy. Those who were now left propping up the empire, for example sugar farmers in Jamaica. 

It is, therefore, appropriate to consider this quirk in the light of the current debate on the legacy of slavery.

Slavery was only outlawed completely, though not entirely stopped, in the “Empire” in 1833 and emancipation was not fully achieved in the USA until 1865.

‘Val would have been pleased that democracy carried on in her ward’

But what was our Police and Crime Commissioner, Alison Hernandez, doing being photographed alongside Tory candidate Paul Carter, EDDC Tory Leader Philip Skinner and Simon Jupp MP?

Didn’t she take an oath to conduct herself “without fear or favour”?

Has she nothing better to do?

All for a paltry 113 votes! – Owl

Paul Arnott www.midweekherald.co.uk

Readers may recall my writing about the passing of the vice chair of East Devon District Council, Val Ranger over the summer after a brave fight against an awful diagnosis. Even now I find it hard to process the loss of a truly loved friend and colleague, and I know many other councillors feel the same.

Val would have been pleased, I feel sure, that democracy carried on last week in her ward of Newton Poppleford and Harpford when a by election was held to find a new councillor to serve the remainder of her term till next May. The winner was an Independent, as Val was, Chris Burhop, well-respected chair of the parish council, by a huge margin.

I also feel Val would have welcomed the campaign of another local candidate, Caleb Early representing the Labour Party. Caleb is not yet twenty, but plainly sincere and passionate, just the kind of person who Val would have nurtured and encouraged. I hope he enjoyed the experience and congratulate him on taking second place. The desire to serve in a younger person gives great hope for local democracy.

Coming third was Paul Carter for the Conservatives and again anyone prepared to put their head above the parapet is to be applauded. The campaign which was run for him by the East Devon Conservatives, however, caused widespread concern in one particular respect.

That worry is over the role of the Devon & Cornwall Police and Crime Commissioner, Alison Hernandez. The oath promised when P&CCs take office is to conduct themselves “without fear or favour”. To many, while these positions are usually elected on political lines, the winner must thereafter check in their party affiliations and partisan campaigning at the door.

Of course, if Ms Hernandez wishes to attend Conservative party rubber chicken evenings, she has every right to do so. But I am very uneasy that someone on £85,000 per year whose sole public focus should be on the fight against crime feels she can spend her time campaigning in by elections.

To be frank – and again, I am not on Twitter but people send me these images – when I saw the Tories open their campaign in Newton Poppleford with a four-shot picture of Mr Carter, EDDC Tory Leader Philip Skinner, Simon Jupp MP, and the “without favour” Police and Crime Commissioner I felt like I’d been punched in the stomach.

For they were openly touting this election, caused only by a tragic premature death of my friend, as the launch of their campaign for next year’s district elections. This was ill advised in two respects. First, it calls into question the judgement and independence of our Police and Crime Commissioner. And second, simply, how deluded were they?

Because while shipping in campaigners from out of Devon to knock on doors, didn’t they have the simple intelligence on the ground to realise that they were always going to be beaten by a country mile and that the missiles from their big cannons would just dribble out of the barrels and explode around their own feet?

Elsewhere in the jungle, Conservative-led Devon County Council is in huge financial trouble, as was reported last week, just as Tory Kent and Hampshire Councils are this week. In this respect however, I feel very different about the Tories.

John Hart, the longstanding Leader of Devon CC, is a decent, serous, old-school, one-nation politician, being sold down the river by his government. The crisis has been almost entirely caused by that government failing to properly fund both child and adult social care and pushing the problem down to the county councils. I wish him well in his campaign to be heard at Westminster.

Autumn Statement: a ‘better than expected’ outcome for councils

But see Owl’s emphases.

And can we predict the local Tory reaction to any EDDC increase in Council Tax?

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt’s Autumn Statement, which introduced additional funding for social care and a delay to charging reforms, has been described by local government finance leaders as “better than expected”.

Aysha Gilmore www.room151.co.uk

In his statement to the House of Commons on 17 November, Hunt promised to prioritise “stability, growth and public services”. He chose to address inflationary pressures facing local authorities by committing up to £2.8bn of additional funding for adult social care in 2023/24 and £4.7bn for the following year.

Hunt also announced a delay to the social care charging reforms from October 2023 to October 2025. Funding for implementation of the reforms will be maintained to enable councils to address current adult social care pressures.

In response to the Autumn Statement, Chris Tambini, president of the Society of County Treasurers and director of corporate resources at Leicestershire County Council, told Room151: “The position is better than expected, and, compared to other parts of the public sector, local government has fared well. Especially welcome is the extra funding for adult social care and deferring the adult social care reforms.”

Tambini’s sentiment was echoed by Tim Oliver, chairman of the County Councils Network (CCN), who called the delay to social care reforms a “brave decision, but completely the right one”.

He said: “We understand that many will be disappointed, but postponing these reforms and reinvesting significant additional funding into frontline care services is strongly welcomed and will protect the most vulnerable in our society as well as buy councils vital time to stabilise the care system.”

Council tax ‘flexibilities’

The chancellor also promised increased “flexibilities” on council tax. Local authorities will be able to increase council tax by up to 3% per year from April 2023 without a referendum, with councils that have social care responsibilities able to increase their council tax by an additional 2% per year. Currently, the overall cap is set at 2.99%.

According to Dan Bates, director at consultancy LGi, local government budget gaps were reported to be about £3.5bn prior to the Autumn Statement. “I’d expect the additional £2.8bn for social care and a modest 1% increase in the council tax referendum limit to be cautiously welcomed by councils,” he told Room151.

“Whether this extra funding can be distributed in a fair way that meets levelling up ambitions remains to be seen. It should give [levelling up secretary] Michael Gove some headroom to equalise the impact that sees councils with high needs and low taxbases, mainly in the North, receive much less from council tax increases.”

Hunt’s announcement on tax flexibilities has been criticised by a range of council leaders. Sir Stephen Houghton, chair of the body representing municipal authorities SIGOMA , said: “Reliance on council tax to fairly fund care and other services is the wrong choice – it raises funding in a way unrelated to need while the increases ‘allowed’ will not come close to the funding gap and will put more pressures on family budgets when they can least afford it.”

Tambini added: “Most income sources including council tax will be lower in real terms in 2023/24 and that is on top of significant real terms cut in spending power this year.

“It has also left local politicians of upper-tier councils with the difficult decision of whether to put up council tax by 5% in the middle of a cost-of-living crises with the largest falls in disposable income on record.”

Devolution ‘milestone’

In his statement, Hunt confirmed the second round of the Levelling Up Fund, which will allocate at least £1.7bn to priority local infrastructure projects. He also announced a new elected mayor in Suffolk and new devolution deals for Cornwall, Norfolk and “an area in the North East”.

Cllr Martin Hill, the CCN’s devolution spokesperson, said: The announcement today that the devolution deal in Suffolk is complete, with those in Cornwall and Norfolk close to completion, is another milestone in the county devolution agenda.

“All three agreements could be genuinely transformative for their local areas, with the Suffolk devolution deal the first of its kind in putting forward a directly-elected county leadership model.”

However, Hunt decided to “refocus” Liz Truss’ investment zones programme by “leveraging our research strengths by being centred on universities”.

Houghton said: “It is welcome that investment zones will be re-prioritised toward ‘left-behind’ areas, but the fact that the original expressions of interest will not be taken forward is just the latest example of the flaws of competitive bidding and the overcentralisation of local government funding pots.”

Hunt also announced that the government will provide £1bn to enable the extension of the Household Support Fund in England over 2023/24.

Voter ID list gives few options for younger voters

Keep the government “Old Stale and Tory” by preventing the young from voting! Looks discriminatory to Owl.

Long-awaited details of the government’s voter ID scheme have now finally been released including details of which IDs will be accepted at the polling station.

With no alternatives for voters who turn up on the day without the required ID or voter certificate, this list is all-important

Author: Jessica Garland, Director of Policy and Research www.electoral-reform.org.uk

Accepted forms of photographic identification for voting in the UK

  • A passport issued by the UK, any of the Channel Islands, the Isle of Man, a British Overseas Territory, an EEA state or a Commonwealth country
  • A driving licence issued by the UK, any of the Channel Islands, the Isle of Man or an EEA state
  • A biometric Immigration document
  • An identity card bearing the Proof of Age Standards Scheme hologram (a PASS card)
  • Ministry of Defence Form 90 (Defence Identity Card)
  • A Blue Badge
  • A national identity card issued by an EEA state
  • An Older Person’s Bus Pass
  • A disabled person’s Bus Pass
  • An Oyster 60+ card
  • A Freedom Pass
  • A Scottish National Entitlement card issued in Scotland
  • A 60 and Over Welsh Concessionary Travel card issued in Wales
  • A Disabled Person’s Welsh Concessionary Travel Card issued in Wales
  • A Senior Smart Pass issued in Northern Ireland
  • A Registered Blind Smart Pass or Blind Person’s Smart Pass issued in Northern Ireland
  • A War Disablement SmartPass or War Disabled SmartPass issued In Northern Ireland
  • A 60+ SmartPass issued in Northern Ireland
  • A Half Fare Smart Pass issued in Northern Ireland
  • An Electoral Identity Card issued In Northern Ireland
  • A Voter Authority Certificate or a temporary Voter Authority Certificate

Acceptable forms of ID are predominantly held by older people

The list, contained in recently tabled secondary legislation, includes passports and driving licences and a range of travel cards – predominantly those held by older people. This has prompted concern that younger people without ID will find it comparatively harder to vote.

Oyster cards

During the passage of the Elections Act we successfully campaigned to extend the list of acceptable IDs. A cross-party group of peers passed an amendment that would have seen student IDs, library cards, bank statements and other easily accessible forms of ID accepted at polling stations. These options would have provided an important backstop for voters who don’t have more expensive forms of identity documents, like passports, and who may not have been able to access the voting certificate option.

The government’s decision to repeal this amendment during the final stages of the bill means that voters now have far fewer options on polling day.

New identification rules for 2023’s local elections

The government intends the new identification rules to be in place for next year’s local elections. For voters in Scotland and Wales, and in local areas that aren’t holding elections in 2023, these new rules will come into effect for the first time in what is likely to be a general election year.

Electoral administrators have already warned about the pressures they face to ensure that the scheme can be implemented in time for next year. Government delays bringing forward key secondary legislation means that final details won’t be legally in place until less than four months before the election. This month we called on the Political and Constitutional Affairs Committee to launch an inquiry into the implementation of voter ID and the impact of these delays.

Alongside concerns about implementation, the Association of Electoral Administrators have raised their fears about the impact on volunteer polling staff who will be forced to make decisions on who should be turned away from the polls.

For anyone following the US mid-terms this week, the importance of voter faith in election processes and outcomes is clear. Putting our electoral system under this sort of pressure risks undermining one of the most important aspects of democratic life – that voters and candidates accept that the process was fair and the results are true.

We have long argued that voter ID is an unnecessary distraction, but the risks involved in getting it wrong are significant.

Add your name to our call to protect your right to vote

LGA responds to Autumn Statement

www.local.gov.uk

“Councils want to work with central government to develop a long-term strategy to deliver critical local services and growth more effectively. Alongside certainty of funding and greater investment, this also needs wider devolution where local leaders have greater freedom from central government to take decisions on how to provide vital services in their communities.”

Responding to the Autumn Statement announced by the Chancellor today, Cllr James Jamieson, Chairman of the Local Government Association, said:

“Local government is the fabric of the country, as has been proved in the recent challenging years we have faced as a nation. It is good that the Chancellor has used the Autumn Statement to act on the LGA’s call to save local services from spiralling inflation, demand, and cost pressures.

“While the financial outlook for councils is better than we feared next year, councils recognise it will be residents and businesses who will be asked to pay more. We have been clear that council tax has never been the solution to meeting the long-term pressures facing services – particularly high-demand services like adult social care, child protection and homelessness prevention. It also raises different amounts of money in different parts of the country unrelated to need and adds to the financial burden facing households.

“We are pleased that government will provide extra funding for adult social care and accepted our ask for funding allocated towards reforms to still be available to address inflationary pressures for both councils and social care providers. Councils have always supported the principle of adult social care reforms and want to deliver them effectively but have warned that underfunded reforms would have exacerbated significant ongoing financial and workforce pressures. The Government needs to use the delay announced today to learn from the trailblazers to ensure that funding and support is in place for councils and providers to ensure they can be implemented successfully.

“The revised social rent cap is higher than anticipated next year but councils will still have to cope with the additional financial burden as a result of lost income. Councils support moves to keep social rents as low as possible but this will have an impact on councils’ ability to build the homes our communities desperately need – which is one of the best ways to boost growth – and retrofit existing housing stock to help the Government meet net zero goals.

“Financial turbulence is as damaging to local government as it is for our businesses and financial markets and all councils and vital services, such as social care, planning, waste and recycling collection and leisure centres, continue to face an uncertain future. Councils want to work with central government to develop a long-term strategy to deliver critical local services and growth more effectively. Alongside certainty of funding and greater investment, this also means wider devolution where local leaders have greater freedom from central government to take decisions on how to provide vital services in their communities.”

Worst fall in UK living standards since records began, says OBR

“It will wipe out the past eight years of growth, as wage rises fail to keep pace with inflation and interest rates rise.”

“Only the third time since the mid-1950s in which there will be back-to-back years of falling living standards.”

“Taxes will rise to 37.1% of GDP by 2027-28, their highest sustained level since the second world war.”

“A future government will face “a very large single fiscal event” in 2027-28 when, according to plans set out today, the Treasury will cut spending and increase taxes by £61.7bn,”

Anna Isaac www.theguardian.com 

The UK has fallen into a recession which will last more than a year and push half a million people out of work, while households face the biggest fall in living standards since records began.

The government spending watchdog forecast a 7% drop in household incomes over the next two years, capping what one of its officials described as a “dismal decade” for growth.

There will be the biggest fall in living standards since records began, with inflation “tipping the economy into a recession lasting just over a year”, the Office for Budget Responsibility said, as it released updated forecasts to accompany chancellor Jeremy Hunt’s autumn statement.

The drop in household spending power will be so acute it will wipe out the past eight years of growth, as wage rises fail to keep pace with inflation and interest rates rise. It will effectively turn the clock back to 2013, the OBR said.

It also marks only the third time since the mid-1950s in which there will be back-to-back years of falling living standards. The last time was in the aftermath of the global financial crisis.

The years since then had been “a dismal decade for UK growth”, said Prof David Miles, a member of the OBR’s budget responsibility committee, adding that in the “very near term”, it was going to be “a year of squeezed budgets for households”.

The economy will shrink by 2%, driving up unemployment by 505,000 by the second half of 2024, the OBR said. GDP will only reach its pre-pandemic level by the end of the same year.

“The medium-term fiscal outlook has materially worsened since our March forecast due to a weaker economy, higher interest rates, and higher inflation,” the OBR said in its latest update on the outlook for the economy and public finances published alongside Jeremy Hunt’s autumn statement.

There will be further pain for homeowners, with house prices set to fall 9% by 2024, the same year in which the next general election is expected to be held, while the average interest rate on mortgage debt will peak at 5%. Unemployment also is set to peak in the second half of 2024.

While household incomes are squeezed, taxes will rise to 37.1% of GDP by 2027-28, their highest sustained level since the second world war. This year, total taxes raised will top £1tn for the first time, after Hunt’s decision to expand the windfall tax.

Overall, the spending watchdog said government borrowing was likely to be higher than forecast in March this year, but would fall relative to economic output from 2024-25 onwards.

Under the plans announced on Thursday, a future government will face “a very large single fiscal event” in 2027-28 when, according to plans set out today, the Treasury will cut spending and increase taxes by £61.7bn, said Andy King, a member of the OBR’s budget responsibility committee.

It would be a “pretty similar number” compared with the 2010 austerity budget, when compared with the size of economies at the time, albeit against a different economic backdrop, King said.

While a fiscal crunch could be delayed until after a general election, some impact from the recession would be felt keenly in the run-up to polling day, according to the OBR’s calculations.

The OBR was embroiled in a political storm around Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng’s mini-budget, which went ahead in September without releasing forecasts from the watchdog.

It said on Thursday, in light of the furore, that its forecast “has been unusual in both the time it took to produce and the process leading to its publication”.

The omission of independent economic and borrowing forecasts triggered a crisis in the bond markets, with a sell-off in UK government debt, known as gilts, as investors felt the government had made a deliberate decision to avoid independent scrutiny of their spending plans.

The pair met with Richard Hughes, OBR chair, in the aftermath of the mini-budget in an attempt to cool markets.

Ahead of the autumn statement, the watchdog said: “This forecast process has been unusually uncertain, with various changes to both internal and public deadlines for forecast rounds, policy changes and publication dates.” The document it produced was also far shorter than usual and noted that there have been “five fiscal events since March”.

[OBR overview of the fiscal outlook can be found here]

Unleash potential of rooftop solar to tackle energy crisis, Devon

Changes to planning policy could turbocharge the rollout of solar energy and help reduce reliance on gas at little or no cost to the public purse, analysis by CPRE, the national countryside charity has shown.  It’s urging the government to target rooftops, car parks and brownfield sites for a rapid expansion of renewables. 

Authored by sharon goble www.thedevondaily.co.uk 

The Devon branch of the charity, Devon CPRE, has been fighting industrial-sized solar farms in the countryside for years, along with locals who oppose these developments on Devon’s farmland. Demands for food security and nature recovery are needlessly clashing with net zero goals. One of the most recent proposals for a large solar farm at Marsh Green, near Exeter, is due to go before East Devon District Council’s planning committee at the end of this month. 

Devon CPRE trustee Steve Crowther says, “Devon CPRE is passionate about ensuring that valuable farmland which we increasingly need for our food security – including the top quality livestock-farming land that’s so abundant in Devon – is not lost to industrial-scale solar farms and massive battery storage sites. 

“Each of the large solar sites which we have been fighting takes the equivalent of a whole average-sized Devon farm out of effective food production. As this CPRE report shows, roofs, canopies and brownfield sites are the solution; and there are more than enough of them nationally to provide all the solar power that our grid can cope with.”

The charity is calling on the government to adopt a renewables strategy that prioritises rooftops, surface car parks and brownfield sites in a concerted effort to attract wide public support. If implemented quickly, the policy could drastically reduce energy bills during the cost-of-living crisis and speed up the transition to net zero, while leaving as much countryside as possible available for farming and nature restoration. 

Analysis by CPRE, using highly conservative estimates, shows that if only a quarter of the UK’s total 250,000ha. of south-facing commercial roof space was useable it could provide  25GW of solar capacity. With good planning and design, 20,000ha. of car parking space could potentially yield an additional 8GW of solar capacity alongside tens of thousands of new homes. The UK already has 14.5GW of solar capacity operational. 

In contrast to the UK’s approach, France has announced plans to fast-track renewable energy by mandating car parks nationwide be covered by solar panels – a popular policy that could generate up to 11GW of power, equivalent to 10 nuclear reactors. Meanwhile, Germany has focussed on rooftops first, with 80% of its solar power coming from panels that generate little public opposition.  

It is evident that a combination of rooftops, surface car parks, brownfield sites and small-scale community energy schemes could make a huge contribution to our onshore renewable energy requirements, especially when coupled with better measures to reduce total energy demand currently missing from the government’s approach.