Government-appointed commissioners ‘set to intervene’ in Birmingham City Council

The Government has said it is continuing to engage with Birmingham City Council amid reports that Michael Gove is set to announce plans to appoint commissioners to take over the day-to-day running of the authority.

Matthew Cooper www.independent.co.uk 

Reports have also suggested that the council, which issued a Section 114 notice on September 5, effectively declaring it was bankrupt, may be forced to sell off assets, including its stake in Birmingham Airport.

The issuing of the notice, because the council will not be able to balance its budget in the next financial year, bans all new spending with the exception of “protecting vulnerable people, statutory services and pre-existing commitments”.

It is believed an announcement could be made by the Government as soon as Tuesday.

In a statement, the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC) said: “We continue to engage regularly with Birmingham City Council, as we have done in recent months, over the pressures it faces, including around its equal pay liability, and have expressed serious concern over its governance arrangements.

“We have requested written assurances from the leader of the council that any decision regarding the council’s issues over equal pay represents the best value for taxpayers’ money.”

National and local newspaper reports have suggested the flagship Library of Birmingham, the city’s Council House, the nearby Museum and Art Gallery, Aston Hall, and the Sarehole Mill Museum are all at risk of being sold off.

Speaking at the weekend, the leader of the Labour-run council, John Cotton, said he had met Mr Gove to discuss support for the council.

Mr Cotton told the BBC’s Politics Midlands programme: “It is clear we are facing a number of challenges in Birmingham so I would like to start by offering an apology on behalf of Birmingham City Council to the people of the city.

“I am apologising for the impact we know this has on citizens.

“We are having to review all of our council activity and look at where we make our spend, but my priority is that we continue focus on frontline service delivery, the things that matter most to the people of this city.”

The council has been grappling with an equal pay liability which has grown over several years.

It is now estimated to stand at around £1 billion and is increasing by millions of pounds per month.

It is also facing an in-year financial gap in its budget which is currently in the region of £87 million, and is having to spend around £100 million on fixing errors in the implementation of a new IT system.

Birmingham City Council declined to comment on the reports.

Sick children’s health worsening as record numbers wait for NHS care in England

Sick children’s health problems are getting worse as record numbers wait up to 18 months for NHS care, doctors treating them have warned.

Denis Campbell www.theguardian.com 

The number of under-18s on the waiting list for paediatric care in England has soared to 423,500, the highest on record. Of those, 23,396 have been forced to wait over a year for their appointment.

Delays facing children and young people are now so common that Dr Jeanette Dickson, the chair of the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, the body representing all UK doctors professionally, warned that children are “the forgotten casualties of the NHS’s waiting list crisis”.

Fewer than three-fifths (57%) of children are now seen within 18 weeks, even though NHS treatment targets say that 92% should be. The number on the waiting list has jumped by 52% since 2021.

“As a paediatrician, I’ve seen first hand the damaging impact that long waiting times have on children, on their education and overall wellbeing, and of course on their families,” said Dr Camilla Kingdon, the president of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH).

The figures came from the RCPCH’s analysis of official performance data recently published by NHS England.

The health of some children was deteriorating while they languished on the waiting list because their illness and age meant they needed to have their treatment fast, Kingdon added. “Many treatments and interventions must be administered within specific age or developmental stages. No one wants to wait for treatment, but children’s care is frequently time-critical.”

She cited the example of children with serious hearing problems being harmed as a result of being forced to wait to have surgery to receive cochlear implants. “It’s critical for language development to get them in around a year of age,” she said.

“Waiting lists for radiology – because you usually need a general anaesthetic for good-quality pictures – mean that the pre-op work up is often delayed for months, plus surgery can be delayed by 10 to 12 months. So instead of doing it at 10 months of age, it’s done at 18-20 months. That’s a massive difference developmentally in terms of speech and language development.”

Under-18s were also facing long delays for community-based services, not just hospital care, added Kingdon, a consultant paediatrician in London. “I had a baby with an evolving cerebral palsy who desperately needed a special occupational therapy chair. This was a bright little boy of eight months who had every potential of making very good progress.

“Because he [was in] a neighbouring borough with very long therapy waiting lists, there was a six-month delay for getting the chair. Six months’ delay when you’re eight months old and wanting to sit but needing the extra support is an absolute disaster.”

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: “Cutting waiting lists is one of the government’s top five priorities and despite disruption from strikes, we have virtually eliminated 18-month waits and are taking immediate action to bring down long waits.

“We are improving support for children, young people, and their families by providing around £300m to fund a three-year Family Hubs and Start for Life programme, in 75 local authorities in England, and they are already making a difference by bringing together services and support for families with babies and children of all ages.”

Dickson and Kingdon voiced their fears as the academy published a new report into children’s health that criticised the government for ignoring young people’s needs when devising key health policies.

“All medical Royal College leaders are genuinely horrified at the current lack of emphasis on the health of children and young people. It’s as if they don’t exist,” said Dickson.

The report highlights the government’s controversial decision to publish a strategy covering a large number of major conditions, instead of having specific plans for each one. Although the strategy will replace several key child health plans, it mainly focuses on adult health.

The academy also criticises ministers for abandoning plans to tackle obesity, despite the growing number of school-age children who are dangerously overweight, and also for delaying publication of a vaccination strategy, even though take-up has declined across 13 of the 14 routine childhood vaccinations.

The report urges Rishi Sunak to create a cabinet-level minister for children and young people, offer free school meals to all primary school pupils, ramp up vaccination efforts, and expand mental health services for under-18s as part of a renewed drive to improve child health and prevent illness.

After heavy rain – the inevitable

Dozens of Devon beaches hit with pollution alerts

Around 83% of Devon’s beaches could potentially be dangerous to swim in after 28 of them triggered a “sewage pollution alert” and 11 others have been handed a “pollution risk forecast or incident alert”. This is according to Surfers Against Sewage (SAS), who monitor water quality across 47 beaches in the county.

Elliot Ball www.devonlive.com

According to SAS, a pollution alert means “storm sewage has been discharged from a sewer overflow in this location within the past 48 hours”. Meanwhile, a “pollution risk forecast or incident alert” means there is potential for sewage to be in the area.

Beaches on both the south and north side of Devon are affected, including tourist hot spots Torquay, Salcombe and Exmouth. The main contributing factor to polluted beaches is urban runoff, which sees fertilizers, pesticides, oil, and untreated human and animal waste all entering waterways, such as rivers.

These harmful contaminants then eventually end up at our beaches. The contaminated water largely remains on the surface. This can make it dangerous to enter the water. According to Surf Today, some experts even suggest waiting 72 hours before entering the sea again after it rains.

Swallowing water that could be contaminated with fecal matter could lead to gastroenteritis, hepatitis, giardiasis, skin rashes, amoebic dysentery, nose, ear, and throat problems, pink eye, and other respiratory illnesses. Symptoms to look out for include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, cramps, inflamed stomach and intestines.

Devon beaches with pollution alerts or pollution forecasts

  1. Seaton
  2. Beer
  3. Sidmouth Town
  4. Ladram Bay (pollution risk forecast)
  5. Budleigh Salterton
  6. Sandy Bay
  7. Exmouth
  8. Dawlish Town
  9. Dawlish Coryton Cove
  10. Teignmouth Holcombe
  11. Teignmouth Town (pollution risk forecast)
  12. Shaldon
  13. Meadfoot
  14. Beacon Cove
  15. Torre Abbey
  16. Hollicombe (pollution risk forecast)
  17. Paignton Preston Sands
  18. Paignton Sands
  19. Goodrington
  20. St Marys Bay
  21. Dartmouth Castle and Sugary Cove
  22. Slapton Sands Torcross
  23. Salcombe North Sands (pollution risk forecast)
  24. Salcombe South Sands
  25. Hope Cove
  26. Thurlestone South
  27. Bantham (pollution risk forecast)
  28. Bigbury-on-Sea South (pollution risk forecast)
  29. Challaborough (pollution risk forecast)
  30. Mothecombe
  31. Wembury (pollution risk forecast)
  32. Plymouth Hoe East
  33. Plymouth Hoe West
  34. Plymouth Firestone Bay
  35. Westward Ho!
  36. Croyde Bay (pollution risk forecast)
  37. Ilfracombe Hele (pollution risk forecast)
  38. Combe Martin (pollution risk forecast)
  39. Lynmouth

100 not out! – East Devon gets top score

Coastal towns dominate league table for centenarians – as numbers in England and Wales top 13,900…

The number of centenarians in England and Wales has reached a new record high of nearly 14,000, with a striking map showing how coastal areas dominate the long life hotspots.

James Tapsfield www.dailymail.co.uk (Extract)

Some 13,924 had reached the milestone by the time of the 2021 census, up a quarter on a decade ago and a staggering increase from just 110 when the survey was conducted in 1921.

The oldest person was aged 112, according to the analysis released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

And the figures suggested that those with longer lifespans tend to be by the sea, with East Devon, Arun, the New Forest and North Norfolk among the places with the most centenarians relative to their populations.

Nine of the top 10 on that metric were in coastal areas.  

Some 13,924 people in England and Wales had reached age 100 by the time of the 2021 census, a staggering increase from just 110 when the survey was conducted in 1921.

Birmingham had the highest number of centenarians overall at 193, but was a long way down the table relative to population.

Six of the eight local authorities with fewer than 10 centenarians per 100,000 population were London boroughs, while Knowsley and Crawley both had nine. 

The census details underline the huge increases in life expectancy during the 20th Century, with numbers making it to 100 increasing sharply from the 1960s.

The growth has been attributed to advances in healthcare for the elderly, as well as public health measures improving air quality and working conditions.

At the time of the latest survey in 2021 there were 11,288 women and 2,636 men aged at least 100, reflecting the long-standing position that women tend to live longer.

Their average age was 101 years, one month and 2 weeks. 

Around the time of birth of these centenarians in 1921, life expectancy stood at 67.9 years for females and 61.2 years for males.

That meant they had outlived their anticipated lifespans by three or four decades, and experienced momentous events including women getting the vote, the Second World War, the introduction of the NHS and advent of television.

Strikingly, a quarter of the centenarians reported having good or very good health, and almost a third did not have a disability.  ….

Planning applications validated by EDDC for week beginning 4 September

Thought for the day: Truss Untrussed 

According to widespread reports, including www.politico.eu, Truss is set to make an appearance at next month’s Tory party conference.

She is widely expected to play a role in the contest for control of the Conservative Party should Rishi Sunak lose the next election. A government official said she has been seeking to establish links with prospective candidates and tapping up potential allies. A person close to Truss tells Esther: “She’s already been reselected and very much hopes to be reelected next year and to play her part in debates inside the Conservative Party and in the Westminster sphere.”

Where does this leave Simon Jupp?

Remember Simon Jupp lost no time a year ago in joining “Team Truss”, despite having followed his old mentor Dominic Raab in backing Sunak, saying:

“I have been appointed a Parliamentary Private Secretary to the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities. It’s an unpaid, non-ministerial role. With a new PM, there’s a lot to cover – including levelling up, national planning policy, overseeing local government, and introducing more devolution with deals being discussed in Devon and Cornwall. As your MP, East Devon will of course come first.”

As Owl commented at the time: emphasising growth through investment zone tax breaks rather than long-term investment in the infrastructure we are all crying out for; and deregulation across the board to encourage “build,build, build” housing development at all costs were Truss’ priorities at the time.

Well it all ended in tears after she and Kwarteng crashed the economy, leaving us with a shattered economy and a colossal bill.

Simon Jupp, ever the opportunist, jumped ship to Sunak. 

“I accepted a position in government because I wanted it to work. Unfortunately, it didn’t.

“Rishi Sunak has already set out his stall to the nation. He’s got the experience needed to lead the nation and the knowledge to restore economic credibility.

“I’m backing Rishi Sunak for PM.”

And was again duly rewarded within a month as a PPS to the Secretary for State for Transport, though this is a significantly more “junior” ministry, see order of precedence.

Time for more fizz with Lizz?

Perhaps Simon will share his thoughts “going forwards” with us on social media? – Owl

.

Liz Truss will never give up

How many ghosts haunt the Tory party?

The failed UK prime minister is still fighting for her economic agenda — and her legacy.

Esther Webber www.politico.eu 

LONDON — Her term in office was famously shorter-lived than a salad vegetable. But that doesn’t mean Liz Truss is ready to admit she was wrong.

A year on from the pivotal event of her doomed premiership — the ill-fated “mini-budget which sent U.K. financial markets into a tailspin — one might expect the former British prime minister to mark the anniversary in silence … or perhaps in hiding. 

Not Liz Truss. On Monday Truss will try to take ownership of the narrative with a high-profile speech in Westminster to mark the anniversary, defending her economic record and setting out a “vision” for faster growth.

Truss will insist her tax-cutting policies, had they been fully implemented, would have triggered significant investment into the U.K. and sparked long-term improvements to economic growth — and only had to be junked due to intense pressure from “the political and economic establishment.”

“I was effectively forced into a policy reversal under the threat of a U.K. meltdown,” she will say. “The policies I advocate simply aren’t fashionable on the London dinner party circuit.”

Monday’s anniversary-week speech is just the latest act of defiance from a former PM who has stubbornly refused to be sidelined by the collapse of her own political career.

This month Truss also announced she’s writing a book on foreign policy, and has launched her own Westminster think tank, the Growth Commission, to advocate her policy platform.

A fighter, not a quitter

If Truss appears strangely undeterred by her disastrous spell in Downing Street, it comes as little surprise to those who have followed her career over the last 13 years. 

“She was able to rise to the top of the party because she has the skin of a rhino,” says James Heale, a journalist for Tory bible the Spectator, who co-authored her biography, Out of the Blue.

Indeed, Truss’ peculiar ability to shrug off setbacks can be traced to the earliest stages of her career.

She only ascended to high office after enduring a series of bitter and highly personal fights, from her battle to win a parliamentary seat in the late 2000s — against a local Tory faction in rural England which allies dubbed “the Turnip Taliban” — to her determination to relaunch herself after being demoted from the Cabinet in 2017.

“She’s very busy, very focused, very driven,” Kwasi Kwarteng, her friend and former Chancellor, told POLITICO’s Westminster Insider podcast this month. “She’s not been one to hang around and reflect. She charges ahead.”

David Jones, a long-serving Conservative MP who backed her for leader last year, added: “As she said at her last PMQs [Prime Minister’s Questions], she’s a fighter not a quitter. She will simply continue.”

Not all Truss’ fellow Conservatives regard this as a strength.

One former MP who worked alongside her in government described her as “really lacking in EQ [emotional intelligence], the way she goes about things.”

Underpinning Truss’ stubbornness is her commitment to an ideological project which she clearly sees as unfinished. 

In the domestic arena, she still wants to push deregulation and tax cuts as a path to higher growth, and on foreign policy, she argues the West must take a far more muscular approach in dealing with China. 

The last laugh?

Truss’ determination to intervene on these core issues will only be strengthened by her belief, shared by some in the Tory party, that she largely has been proven right — particularly in her analysis of the U.K.’s economic woes.

One ally of Truss remarked that “the first draft of history, as written last autumn, will be looked at as having been overly harsh.” They noted that her diagnosis of failures by the Bank of England and the pensions regulator have since gained wider traction.

“Clearly, she’s concerned about the lack of policies for growth,” added Jones. “I don’t think there’s any doubt at all that we do need to stimulate growth, and that’s something that needs to be grasped.”

Certainly, Truss’ intense focus on economic growth has become more fashionable since she left office. The issue is being trumpeted as a priority not only by some of Truss’ fellow Conservatives, but also by Labour leader Keir Starmer, who used a speech this summer to insist “growth, growth, growth” should be the focus of the nation.

Others in the party think she is claiming too much credit for a fairly unremarkable point, and that her frequent public interventions do the Tories more harm than good.

“If politics was just about having the right idea, then professors would be politicians,” said a second former colleague of Truss.

“Every time she says anything conspicuous, the public is reminded that Liz Truss was prime minister and that it wasn’t some sort of fever dream. We should be trying to push that further into the past.”

Never give in

The public seems to agree. In a survey by YouGov this month, 81 percent said she had done badly as prime minister, including 80 percent of Conservative voters.

Yet Truss shows no signs of letting up. 

She is set to make an appearance at next month’s Conservative Party conference, where she has long been a popular figure among the libertarian grassroots. The presence of a controversial ex-PM is unlikely to boost the chances of a drama-free gathering in Manchester. 

And she’s widely expected to play a role in the contest for control of the Conservative Party if they lose the next election. A government official said Truss has already been seeking to establish links with prospective Tory candidates, tapping up potential allies for the future.

The same Truss ally quoted above said the 48-year-old former leader has no intention of walking away from politics next year.

“She’s already been reselected (as a Tory MP) and very much hopes to be re-elected next year, and to play her part in debates inside the Conservative Party and in the Westminster sphere.” 

Indeed, Truss recently told the Mail on Sunday she “will not rest” until Britain undergoes the radical economic change she wants to see. There is no reason to doubt that she means it.

Aggie Chambre contributed reporting.

Truss challenges Sunak to cut taxes and delay net zero target as she defends her mini-budget

Liz Truss will use a speech tomorrow (18 September) to defend decisions made during her short-lived tenure in Downing Street and call on Rishi Sunak to cut taxes and shrink welfare spending.

Eleanor Langford inews.co.uk 

One year on from her infamous “mini-budget”, which sparked an economic crisis and ultimately led to her reisgnation, Ms Truss will claim that the UK would be in a better economic position today if Rishi Sunak had continued her policies.

In a speech at the Institute for Government, the former prime minister will also urge her successor to embrace free market ideologies, and ditch some green commitments amid cost-of-living pressures on voters.

Ms Truss will claim that “25 years of economic consensus” have caused the UK to experience a “period of stagnation”.

She will blame Britain’s poor growth in recent decades on a shift from free-market capitalist economics to a “corporatist social democracy”, and is set to argue that Conservatives have allowed the “left to frame the economic debate for the last quarter of a century”.

The former PM will argue that she “sought to take on this consensus to try and get the British economy on a better trajectory” during her stint in No 10 through tax cuts, supply-side reform and freezing public spending.

She will claim Mr Sunak’s Government has spent £35 billion more than she would have as prime minister, arguing that if the policies included in her growth plan had been followed, growth would have eventually been higher.

“[Centre for Economics and Business Research] analysis at the time suggested that if the policies had been kept in place, GDP growth would have been 2 per cent higher than otherwise by 2030, and investment would be up 10 per cent and could even have been stronger,” Ms Truss will say.

“This would have been even greater in the longer term. The 20-year GDP impact is normally three to four times bigger. And we can see from evidence on the ground the impact the policies would have had.”

Her staunch defence of her economic approach has been criticised by opposition parties, with Labour calling on Mr Sunak to block her resignation honours list.

In a letter to the Prime Minister, Shadow paymaster general Jonathan Ashworth criticised reports that up to 14 people “who crashed the economy, who left millions to pay more for their mortgage and who undermined our economic institutions could receive an award”.

He said suggestions that Mr Sunak would be following convention by approving her list showed “weak leadership and lack of grip over your own party”.

Commenting on Ms Truss’s speech, Liberal Democrat Deputy Leader Daisy Cooper MP said: “Liz Truss giving a speech on economic growth is like an arsonist giving a talk on fire safety.

“The Conservatives blew a hole in the nation’s finances, added hundreds of pounds to people’s mortgages and are still fighting like rats in a sack as our economy flatlines.

Her party has also called on the government to strip her of the annual allowance which can be claimed ex-PMs towards office costs and security measures.

“Allowing Truss continued access to this taxpayers’ cash is a slap in the face for every family still suffering the consequences of her disastrous economic experiment,” Ms Cooper added.

Boris Johnson: Officials discussed raising concerns about former PM to Queen

Senior government officials spoke to Buckingham Palace at the height of the pandemic to express their concern about Boris Johnson’s conduct in office, the BBC has been told.

By Laura Kuenssberg www.bbc.co.uk

Officials even discussed suggesting to the Queen she raise the concerns with Mr Johnson during private audiences.

The revelation comes in episode two of the BBC documentary series, Laura Kuenssberg: State of Chaos.

It explores the turmoil in Westminster and Whitehall over four years.

Based on interviews with key players at the top of government, the series covers the period between 2016 and the departure of Liz Truss as prime minister in 2022.

In May 2020, as the government was grappling with the pandemic, there were significant tensions between Mr Johnson’s political team and the Civil Service.

Now, sources have revealed that senior officials expressed their fears about the former prime minister’s conduct in government to Buckingham Palace.

There were a number of clashes between Dominic Cummings, the former prime minister’s controversial chief of staff, and the head of the Civil Service, who subsequently left, Sir Mark Sedwill.

It’s understood officials expressed their worries to the Palace in the hope the Queen could raise concerns in her private conversations.

It’s understood there were a number of phone calls and communications over and above routine communication between Number 10 and the Palace.

One source said the then-prime minister “had to be reminded of the constitution”.

Another source described the atmosphere in Downing Street during that period as “utterly grim, and totally crazy”, saying relationships had been “just toxic” and the links between Mr Johnson’s team and the Civil Service “broke down”.

There had already been worries at Buckingham Palace about Mr Johnson’s government’s behaviour after the Commons had been kept closed the previous summer – the so-called “prorogation” in 2019 which had been technically carried out by the Queen.

That move that was subsequently judged by the Supreme Court to have broken the law. A source has told the BBC that raised “acute concern”.

Speaking in the documentary, the former deputy cabinet secretary, Helen MacNamara, refused to discuss the calls to Buckingham Palace.

“There were definitely times after the prime minister came back from his illness [he contracted Covid and required hospital treatment] when the kind of the perception amongst the political team at Number 10 about the failings of the system and the failings of the Civil Service and the failings of different institutions, it was just so extreme the way that they were articulating that, they were in absolutely kind of smash everything up, shut it all down, start again… we were systematically in real trouble,” she said.

Buckingham Palace declined to comment.

Kwarteng turns on Truss and says she was ‘not wired’ to be PM

Kwasi Kwarteng has said Liz Truss was “not wired” to be prime minister, as the former chancellor turned on his old boss on the anniversary of their mini-Budget disaster.

Adam Forrest www.independent.co.uk

It comes as it emerged a radical “flat tax” that would have seen all workers pay only 20 per cent was considered for their autumn statement which sparked economic and political turmoil.

One year on from Ms Truss’s spree of unfunded tax cuts, the former PM is set to launch an astonishing attack on Rishi Sunak’s government – claiming it has spent £35bn more than she would have if she had remained at No 10.

The short-lived premier will use a speech on Monday to defend her time in charge, nearly a year on from the ill-fated mini-Budget that helped end her premiership after only six weeks.

In his most frank interview yet, Mr Kwarteng questioned Ms Truss’s temperament and claimed she would have “blown up” something – even if the pair had escaped the mess of the autumn statement.

“I love her dearly, she’s a great person, very sincere and honest,” he told the Telegraph’s political editor in a new book. “But if it hadn’t been the mini-Budget, she would have blown up on something else.”

The former chancellor added: “I just don’t think her temperament was right. She was just not wired to be a prime minister.”

Mr Kwarteng revealed in a new book by Ben Riley-Smith, The Right to Rule, that he thought his sacking by Ms Truss only six days before her own exit was “completely insane”.

Summoned to her office after a trip to Washington DC amid economic turmoil, Ms Truss was said to be in tears at having to fire him. “They’re going to come after you now,” Mr Kwarteng said.

He added: “They’re going to ask you: If you’ve sacked him for doing what you campaigned on, why are you still there?”

Told Jeremy Hunt was going to replace him, Mr Kwarteng fumed: “Hunt?! He’s going to reverse everything!” Before leaving he told the PM: “You’ve got three weeks.”

It also emerged that the Truss government considered a radically right-wing proposal for a flat tax on income of 20 per cent, submitted by the then business secretary Jacob Rees-Mogg. The idea was reportedly referred to as “full Estonia” by senior Tories – but was rejected by Mr Kwarteng.

Despite a fresh round of scrutiny and criticism of the mini-Budget, Ms Truss is set to defend her ideas at a speech at the Institute for Government and criticise Mr Sunak’s economic policy.

Ms Truss will reportedly point out that under her plans £18.4bn would have been saved in 2023-24, with another £17.1bn in 2024-25.

She will claim the PM was wrong to put more into public services since taking office and will say she wanted to save money by increasing benefits with wages rather than the higher rate of inflation.

“Even those modest savings did not command the support of the parliamentary party,” Ms Truss is expected to say. “It is a very serious issue for those of us who want to see smaller government that currently making significant changes to spending simply doesn’t have enough political support.”

The comments are set to spark another round of infighting, with some on the Tory right keen to see spending cuts to pay for tax reductions.

Andy Street, the influential Tory mayor of the West Midlands, warned Mr Sunak against the idea of a real-terms cut to benefits – thought to be under consideration. He told The Observer a rise in line with inflation “has to happen again because that’s a real symbol”.

Meanwhile, Labour said Britain’s homeowners have taken a hit of more than £300bn in the year since the Truss mini-Budget.

The party pointed to a fall of around 5 per cent in house prices since September 2022, saying it meant UK households have seen £336bn wiped off the value of their property in the last year.

Pat McFadden, shadow Cabinet Office minister, said families continued to suffer “thanks to Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng’s disastrous casino economics”.

Poll comfort for Sunak……he ranks above Truss!

Rishi Sunak is seen as less competent on economic affairs than most recent Conservative prime ministers, according to the latest Opinium poll for the Observer.

But read on for the “good news”! – Owl

Michael Savage www.theguardian.com 

The prime minister has made reducing inflation one of his key priorities, as well as reducing debt and avoiding a recession. Much of his pitch has been on his economic management skills as a former chancellor.

Sunak ranks below David Cameron, Theresa May and Boris Johnson, with only 27% thinking that his Conservatives are handling the economy well. Some 60% think they are handling it poorly. He ranks higher than Liz Truss, whose leadership imploded after her disastrous mini-budget. A large majority (78%) think her party performed poorly, 10% that they did well.

The poll reveals significant economic concerns. Half (48%) of voters think the UK economy will worsen over the next 12 months, with 22% thinking it will get better. Only 20% think their personal finances will improve.

General economic worries are widespread. Three in four (77%) worry about the state of the economy generally, 59% about interest rate rises and 82% about inflation and the cost of living.

Overall, Labour maintains a strong lead over the Tories ahead of a crucial party conference season. Keir Starmer’s party leads by 15 points, with 41% of the vote compared to 26% for the Tories. Sunak’s approval ratings have fallen further, to -30% net. Starmer remains the preferred choice for prime minister among voters, with 29% choosing him and 23% opting forSunak. A larger proportion pick neither leader (38%).

Adam Drummond, head of political and social research at Opinium, said: “There remain no signs of a Conservative turnaround in the polls, with Labour on a 15-point lead. Looking ahead to the next election, voters most want to see the Conservative government focus on cutting NHS waiting times and cutting inflation. Despite these being two of the five pledges Rishi Sunak made earlier in the year, the public remain sceptical of his government being able to do so, with around half of voters thinking these are unachievable under his government.”

Opinium polled 2,051 people online from 13-15 September. Results have been weighted to be politically and nationally representative.

Liz Truss mini-Budget ‘left homeowners £300bn worse off’

Britain’s homeowners have taken a hit of more than £300bn in the year since Liz Truss’s disastrous mini-Budget, according to new analysis.

Adam Forrest www.independent.co.uk

This week marks the first anniversary of the calamitous spree of unfunded tax cuts launched by the then-PM and her chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng, which sparked market turmoil.

Labour claimed that the pair’s “casino economics” had caused ongoing damage to the housing market which “inaction man” Rishi Sunak had failed to fix.

The party pointed to a fall of around 5 per cent in house prices since September 2022 – saying it meant UK households have seen £336bn wiped off the value of their property in the last year.

The average monthly mortgage payment is up by £220 since a year ago, Bank of England figures show, as hard-pressed families struggle to cope with the burden of higher interest rates during the cost of living crisis.

There has been frustration for first-time buyers and those looking to move house, with official figures showing that mortgage approvals have fallen by 40 per cent since the mini-Budget.

Halifax has said house prices have fallen by 4.6 per cent over the past year, while Nationwide puts the drop at 5.3 per cent. Experts have warned the slump could continue until 2025.

Pat McFadden, Labour’s shadow Cabinet Office minister, said families continued to suffer “thanks to Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng’s disastrous casino economics”.

He added: “Rishi Sunak, the ‘inaction man’ prime minister, is no better, allowing himself to be trapped by divisions in the Tory party and failing to solve the problems facing the country.”

Ms Truss was booted out of No 10 by her own party in late October last year – only six weeks after winning the leadership contest and succeeding Boris Johnson.

Failure to balance the books at the mini-Budget led to market panic, a falling pound and rising interest rates. The Bank of England was forced into emergency action to save pension funds close to collapse.

In interviews since leaving, Ms Truss has largely blamed Whitehall officials for the economic turmoil sparked by her mini-Budget – saying no one told her about the risk to pension funds.

She expressed some remorse about trying to abolish the 45p top rate of tax for the wealthy – a move she was forced abandoned after an outcry from her own MPs – saying she may have been “trying to fatten the pig on market day”.

Labour has attacked Mr Sunak for scrapping binding housebuilding targets. But the Tories have accused Sir Keir of turning from a “builder to a blocker” after Labour peers defeated government plans to axe water pollution rules in a bid to boost housebuilding.

Commenting on Labour analysis, Treasury minister John Glen said Sir Keir had “no plan to tackle the big issues facing the country”.

“Sir Keir Starmer would take the easy way out with his £28bn a year borrowing spree, leading to higher inflation and higher mortgage rates,” the Tory minister added.

“Rishi Sunak and the Conservatives are focused on providing immediate relief to families and on their priorities. That is why we will halve inflation, grow the economy and reduce debt, building a stronger economy for the future.”

Tories and Labour neck and neck in battle for Nadine Dorries seat, poll shows

Where is the “Progressive Alliance”? – Owl

Labour and the Conservatives are neck and neck in the byelection battle for Nadine Dorries’ old constituency of Mid Bedfordshire, new polling has revealed.

Adam Forrest www.independent.co.uk

The Survation survey offers evidence that a split in the “progressive” vote could allow Rishi Sunak’s party to hold onto the seat despite wider unpopularity.

Campaigners are pushing Labour and the Liberal Democrats to form an unofficial electoral pact so only one of the big parties pushes to take the blue wall stronghold.

The new poll for Labour Together – which puts Labour and the Tories on 29 per cent – will add to pressure on Ed Davey to accept that Keir Starmer’s party has the best chance of overturing a 24,000 Tory majority.

The Lib Dems are languishing in third place on 22 per cent in the contest, set to take place on 19 October. Reform UK is on 7 per cent, while independent candidate Gareth Mackey has 6 per cent.

The Survation found poll also found that large proportion – 27 per cent – of people in the seat who are planning to vote remain undecided, with Labour activists pouncing upon the results to encourage Lib Dem supporters to switch to Sir Keir’s party.

Josh Simons, director of Labour Together, said the polling “clearly shows this is a two-horse race between Labour and the Conservatives”.

He added: “After 13 years, Britain needs the Conservatives out and Keir Starmer’s Labour in. Voting Labour is the best and only way for voters in Mid Bedfordshire to send a message to this shambolic Tory government.”

However, the latest poll suggests that Labour has lost its lead. An Opinium poll in June put Labour on 28 per cent, the Tories on 24 per cent and the Lib Dems on 15 per cent.

A source for Sir Ed’s party said the poll showed Labour had “stalled” because they only gained 1 per cent in a month, while the Lib Dem vote share had “surged” since then. They added: “We are fired up by this poll, which shows we are on track to win with 5 weeks to go.”

Polling guru Prof John Curtice has said the vote could “collapse” but they could still “hang on” because of an almost even vote split between Labour and the Lib Dems.

Tory peer and elections expert Robert Hayward also said Rishi Sunak’s party had a good chance of winning. “Keir Starmer’s determination to prove he can appeal to all parts of the country has surprised the Lib Dems,” he told The Independent.

The Compass campaign group have warned that the “ghost” of the recent Uxbridge by-election should loom large over Mid Bedfordshire – pointing to the Tories hanging on despite Boris Johnson’s unpopularity.

Lib Dem officials have argued that there is a natural ceiling to the Labour vote in Mid Bedfordshire because of the demographics in the rural constituency.

Mr Davey made his fifth visit to the home counties seat on Saturday, where he will spoke to voters in rural villages. He said “lifelong Conservative voters are turning to the Liberal Democrats to send this government a message”.

Mr Dorries finally formally resigned earlier this month having pledged to leave back in early June over her failure to gain a peerage in Boris Johnson’s resignation honours list.

The arch Johnson loyalist was furious at failing to win a peerage in her former boss’ resignation honours – alleging that “posh boy” Mr Sunak had blocked it.

The ex-culture secretary has claimed that No 10 is “pushing a line” that her delayed book launch is because she has broken the ministerial code and has been silenced.

Her book The Plot: The Political Assassination of Boris Johnson, had been scheduled for release at the end of September to coincide with the start of the Tory. But the publisher announced a delay until November for legal checks.

Ms Dorries denied the book had been delayed because of ministerial code issues. “What they [No 10] don’t seem to get is that it’s not about me or my time in office, it’s all about them. It’ll be worth the wait.”

Voter ID rules criticised by MPs, election watchdog and election administrators

Author: Mike Wright, Head of Communications www.electoral-reform.org.uk 

This week three separate independent reports have exposed the extent of the unnecessary damage voter ID has wrought to our democracy. Voter ID was rushed through for the local elections in May which meant voters needed to produce a government-approved form of identification before they voted.

An interim report by the Electoral Commission published earlier this year showed that at least 14,000 people were prevented from casting their vote, after being turned away from polling stations and not returning. Further reports this week by the Electoral Commission, the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Democracy and the Constitution, and the Local Government Information Unit, have now shed further light on how this policy has affected voters.

“some people found it harder than others to show accepted voter ID, including disabled people and the unemployed”

The Electoral Commission: Report on the May 2023 local elections in England

The Electoral Commission released its full report on voter ID at the local elections and found that it had a disproportionate effect on disabled and unemployed voters, who were more likely not to vote due to not having ID. It also found a greater proportion of 18-25-year-olds as well as people from ethnic minority backgrounds said they had turned up to polls without ID.

The report called for a number of changes to the ID rules including reviewing the types of acceptable ID, allowing for vouching (where one voter attests for another), giving people without an accepted form of ID more time to apply for a Voter Authority Certificate, and to improve the data collected on who is affected by voter ID. The report concluded: “It is crucial that improvements are made at the earliest opportunity, particularly given there are important elections that are due to be held during the next 18 months, to improve accessibility and support those people who do not have an accepted form of ID”.

The current voter-ID system is, as it stands, a “poisoned cure” in that it disenfranchises more electors than it protects

The APPG on Democracy and the Constitution: Voter ID – What went wrong and how to fix it

This report found that voter ID had had a disproportionate impact on different people and warned that the “inherent ambiguity in the regime creates a real risk of injustice and potential discrimination.” The report highlighted the case of an immunocompromised woman who was turned away from a polling station after she refused to remove her mask to be identified. The report added: “The current voter-ID system is, as it stands, a ‘poisoned cure’ in that it disenfranchises more electors than it protects.”

Administrators were unconvinced that the introduction of voter ID has reduced public concerns about fraud

Local Government Information Unit: The Impact of Voter ID: The Views of Administrators

The Unit warned in its report that it “is still not clear that voter ID brings any benefits to the process” of elections and that electoral works did not see personation fraud “as a major issue” prior to the 2023 elections. However, it warned that voter ID had put additional pressures on electoral and polling station staff and warned that action is needed to “stop these invisible pressures from developing into unignorable election failures.”

Three reports, three different areas of failure for voter ID

These three reports lay bare in stark fashion how voter ID has made it disproportionately harder for different groups of voters to exercise their basic democratic right and also threatens to cause problems in the coming general election. We should be looking to strengthen our democracy by increasing turnout and increasing access to voting, not throwing unnecessary barriers in front of people.

With just one conviction and one caution for personation fraud recorded at the 2019 election, voter ID was always a solution in search of a problem. Yet now we can see it has caused problems with our elections that were not there before.

It’s clear that the Government needs to scrap this unnecessary and damaging policy before the next general election, or at the very least make sweeping changes to prevent it from causing major disruption.

Plans announced for Torbay hospital redevelopment

A new £100 million redevelopment of Torbay’s tired hospital is an opportunity that only arises once in a generation, councillors have been told.

Guy Hender www.radioexe.co.uk

 New plans for Torbay Hospital (courtesy: Torbay and South Devon NHS Trust)

Some of its oldest buildings will make way for state-of-the-art new facilities, while a new medical hub in Torquay town centre will handle tens of thousands of appointments every year.

“These are really exciting times for Torbay’s NHS,” said Adel Jones, director of transformation and partnerships at the Torbay and South Devon NHS Trust.

“It feels like a once-in-a-generation opportunity.”

The council’s adult social care and health committee was shown the latest plans for the massive hospital scheme, which has already started to take shape.

A new radiotherapy centre will open in October, followed by an endoscopy suite the following month. New day-case theatres will open in the new year.

It comes as part of the government’s New Hospital Programme and will be finished by 2030.

As part of the same project, a community diagnostic centre will be built in Torquay, operated by the privately-owned InHealth Group.

“We haven’t seen this kind of investment in the NHS here for a very long time,” said Ms Jones.

And programme director Chris Knights added: “It isn’t just about building a better hospital. It’s about the way we deliver our care.”

The committee was told that the changes would allow the overcrowded emergency department to expand, with twice as much space available.

“It was built in the 1960s for 1960s activity,” he said. “It needs to be upgraded completely.”

The new £5 million town centre hub is designed to offer more than 46,000 patients ultrasound, MRI, CT and other tests every year. It could open as early as April next year.

Councillors raised concerns about how the hospital will deal with an ever-growing Torbay population, and Ms Jones told them: “Care is changing.

“We will be using more digital techniques to help people stay in their own homes. People can be overseen by consultants while staying in their own homes and being monitored there.”

Council leader David Thomas (Con, Preston) said the project was ‘fantastically good news’ and a huge investment for Torbay.

And committee chairman Patrick Joyce (Con, Wellswood) added: “It’s exciting and it’s long overdue. We need to be able to support the people that live in Torbay, and there are really good things ahead.”

Hard lessons to learn on Voter ID before the next election

A new report by the Electoral Commission recommends expanding the list of accepted IDs, providing options for those without ID such as being vouched for by another voter, and raising awareness of the support available for disabled voters.

Sean O’Grady www.independent.co.uk 

A new report by the Electoral Commission raises significant concerns about the impact on the next general election of the new rules on voter ID. Under legislation passed in 2022, voters in mainland Britain are now required to show photographic ID at polling stations, and when registering for a postal vote. According to the commission’s survey of how officials dealt with the new rules at May’s local elections in England, significant improvements need to be made in voter awareness, and in resources available to returning officers, for the system to work better in the more intense atmosphere of a general election where turnout is typically twice as high. (Voter ID is already well established in Northern Ireland, where historically electoral fraud has been more widespread.)

The commission recommends expanding the list of accepted IDs, providing options for those without ID such as being vouched for by another voter, and raising awareness of the support available for disabled voters.

What’s wrong with the system?

The commission says its work confirms earlier interim findings after the May elections in England: most who wanted to vote were able to do so, but some groups struggled to meet the ID requirement. It says this stemmed from two overlapping issues: variations in levels of ownership of accepted ID (such as passports), and awareness of the new requirement. In particular, there seems to be scant use of the new Voter Authority Certificate, which is free photo ID for those without a passport or driving licence. Only 25,000 were used in May, for example. Voters who didn’t have the right ID tended to be poorer and from ethnic minorities. Given that municipal elections have lower turnouts anyway, the real impact on a national election is yet to be seen, and the commission has concerns.

How big is the problem?

It’s hard to be precise, but the commission has some estimates. The most visible manifestation of the problem is voters turning up to polling stations without adequate identification. (They are turned away; some, but not all, return.) “At least 0.25 per cent of people who tried to vote at a polling station in May 2023 were not able to because of the voter ID requirement – this was equivalent to approximately 14,000 people who were not issued with a ballot paper,” the commission says.

That is a relatively small figure, but regrettable because everyone has a right and civic duty to vote and the scale of fraud was always far less than those sorts of numbers. Frauds were also almost entirely confined to local, not general, elections and typically involved postal voting rather than ‘‘impersonation’’ at the polling station.

However, the much bigger problem is also far less visible: those who decide not to bother voting simply because the necessary photo ID isn’t readily to hand. The commission’s survey evidence indicates that “around four per cent of all people who said they did not vote at the elections on 4 May listed the ID requirement as the reason… three per cent blamed not having the necessary ID, and one per cent said they disagreed with the new requirement”.

Democracy Volunteers, a group of election observers, found that more than one per cent of voters were turned away from polling stations because of ID requirements at the local elections – half of whom appeared to be from minority ethnic backgrounds.

The emergence of a new phenomenon – ‘‘election greeters’’ on the street outside some polling stations – will also have turned voters away before they had a chance to record an unsuccessful attempt.

In any case, compulsory photo ID does suppress and distort the vote, and by more than fraud ever did. If maximising participation and maintaining confidence in parliamentary democracy is the aim, voter ID has failed.

What is the electoral impact?

It hits the poor and ethnic minorities hardest, and some commentators say that it therefore tended to hurt Labour and help the Conservatives. However, even if that were so, it is not quite absolute, because Labour doesn’t “own” 100 per cent of the votes of the poor or of all undifferentiated ethnic minorities in any case – so it’s a relative effect.

In addition, it depends on how the poor and ethnic minorities were going to vote. At the 2019 general election, the Conservatives did markedly better than normal and better than the opposition in harvesting support among older and less well-off sections of society. For this reason, the former cabinet minister Jacob Rees-Mogg declared at the National Conservatives conference earlier this year: “Parties that try and gerrymander end up finding their clever scheme comes back to bite them, as, dare I say, we found by insisting on voter ID for elections. We found the people who didn’t have ID were elderly and they, by and large, voted Conservative, so we made it hard for our own voters and we upset a system that worked perfectly well.”

But wasn’t it a Conservative election manifesto commitment?

Not exactly. The 2019 document ‘‘Get Brexit Done Release Britain’s Potential’’ merely promised: “We will protect the integrity of our democracy, by introducing identification to vote at polling stations, stopping postal vote harvesting and measures to prevent any foreign interference in elections.” So, yes to proof of identity, but no mention of passports or photo ID. In any case, adjusting a safe and secure democratic franchise is best done by cross-party consensus.

Would Labour reverse it?

They have not explicitly promised to, but it is heavily implied. Florence Eshalomi, shadow minister for democracy, has commented: “It is wrong that the Conservatives have snatched the ability of legitimate voters to have a say in their services and society… ministers are required to hold a comprehensive review into this discredited policy and there must be no more dither and delay.”

Council sells Looe flats worth £640,000 for £1 to ensure affordable housing

Cornwall Council has agreed to sell historic Grade II listed flats in Looe, which are worth £640,000, for just £1 to ensure affordable homes stay in the centre of a Cornish town.

Lee Trewhela www.cornish-times.co.uk 

The council’s cabinet approved a recommendation yesterday (Wednesday, September 13) to release the 11 Coastguard Flats in Looe to a community land trust for the nominal fee as the maintenance of the building is too costly for the council.

An appraisal was carried out by Cornwall Housing in 2021 which concluded that the refurbishment of the building on Looe’s North Road was financially unviable and consequently the property, which was previously four houses, was declared surplus to the council’s needs. With support from Looe councillors Edwina Hannaford and Armand Toms, Three Seas Community Land Trust stepped in and said it would be able to carry out a full refurbishment of the properties at a cost of over £1 million, which it will achieve by grant funding.

Cornwall Council’s deputy leader Cllr David Harris said: “This will retain much-needed affordable housing provision in Looe. Coastguard Flats is a substantial Grade II listed building. It is highly likely that an open market sale would result in the loss of affordable housing provision in Looe and have a negative impact on the housing service by increasing the demand for temporary accommodation.

“A community-led redevelopment scheme would ensure the flats would still be used for affordable housing provision. Three Seas intends to carry out a full refurbishment of the properties and have said the cost of works will be in excess of £1-million.”

The cabinet meeting heard that the project would be hard to achieve without grant funding, which is available from Homes England, which supports the project.

Cllr Ollie Monk, portfolio holder for housing, added: “When I first got the job, this was one of the first places I visited. I came away thinking that could be a great opportunity but it became quickly apparent that it was a really tricky site for the council. Thanks to councillors Edwina Hannaford and Armand Toms, and Three Seas Community Land Trust, we’ve managed to get a deal together.

“It keeps affordable housing right in the heart of the Looe community. Any affordable housing is now being built three or four miles away such is the shortage of land available in the centre of Looe. I can’t wait to see the progress of the project.”

Cllr Hannaford, said she is “delighted” by the move after years of campaigning, adding: “Providing secure affordable housing is incredibly important for the people of Looe. The lack of affordable housing in Looe is a real emergency, replicated across Cornwall.”

Pledge to cut NHS waiting lists may not be met, PM admits

Rishi Sunak has admitted his key pledge to bring down NHS waiting lists is in doubt after latest figures show a record 7.68m people are waiting for routine hospital treatment.

Jane Merrick inews.co.uk 

The Prime Minister said it was “very hard” to meet his targets due to strikes by NHS staff including junior doctors and consultants.

In January, Mr Sunak pledged to bring down waiting lists before the next election as one of five key promises of his premiership.

Since that target was set, the number of people on the list has risen every month. The 7.68m figure relates to people waiting for a routine operation in July, and is set to climb even higher.

Mr Sunak told the BBC: “Well obviously that is challenging with industrial action. There’s no two ways about it.

“We were making very good progress before industrial action.”

Asked whether it was possible he would miss the waiting list target, the Prime Minister said: “Well with industrial action it’s very hard to continue to meet these targets, but what I would say is we are making very good progress despite industrial action.”

However, NHS waiting lists were already high in England before strikes by NHS workers began around a year ago, mainly due to the backlog caused by the Covid pandemic.

Industrial action by nurses and ambulance workers was resolved earlier this year but junior doctors and consultants are still staging walkouts over pay.

Professor Philip Banfield, chair of the British Medical Association, urged the Health Secretary Steve Barclay to return to the negotiating table to bring an end to the strikes.

He said: “It’s obvious the Health Secretary has no plan at all to put an end to strikes. He appears to be ‘hoping that doctors will give up’.

“This is simply not going to happen. Doctors have worked tirelessly to do what they can with rising waiting lists for over a decade, due to chronic underfunding, then saved lives through a pandemic in horrendous and often brutal conditions.

“You cannot run down the health service over 10 years, devalue the expertise of doctors and expect our resolve to stand up for patients to dissipate magically.”

PM Rishi Sunak has been in Devon yesterday

Owl understands he was helicoptered in and out for a fleeting visit to a vulnerable seat,  indeed a fleeting visit to an electorally vulnerable region.

Many questions but do we have any answers? – Owl

The Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak has been talking about healthcare, housing and believes the region’s voters will back him in the next election. Mr Sunak met with North Devon MP Selaine Saxby on Thursday, September 14 at North Devon District Hospital in Barnstaple, where he met with staff and patients.

Lewis Clarke www.devonlive.com

He toured the hospital’s new £2million discharge lounge and Coronation Suite which was built as part of an initiative to support hospital discharge procedures.

He also spent ten minutes talking with DevonLive reporter Lewis Clarke, who asked him about healthcare, as well as wider issues surrounding the region.

He started the interview saying: “I love North Devon, I came to see Selaine up in Ilfracombe at the Landmark Theatre, which was on the sea, and absolutely stunning, so this is my second time in the area. I was Chancellor then, so this is my first time as Prime Minister , and it was breathtakingly beautiful.”

He was asked about plans for a new accommodation facility at the hospital, and whether he was confident this would be delivered soon.

He said: “Yes I am. I think it’s a great sign of the Govnerment’s commitment to the area, but also this incredible hospital.

“Healthcare in rural areas is something that requires particular care and attention. Selaine has rightly championed that and her and I have spoken in debate on this issue when I was between jobs last year. That’s why building accommodation on site is so important to provide the healthcare that people here need, and that their clinical staff have somewhere to stay. The hospital here is part of our 40 hospital programme and is an exciting sign of our commitment to the area and particularly healthcare.

“It comes on the back of investments we’ve already made here. I have been walking around here today and seen two things the government has done in the last year in the new ward doing elective orthopaedic surgery, brilliantly protecting that, so it’s separate to whatever is happening in the rest of the hospital, so they’re able to crack through people’s orthopaedic surgery and hip replacements, which is already making a huge difference to people thanks to Government funding last year that allowed that new ward to open.

“I’ve also seen the discharge lounge which just opened a couple of months ago; again, brand new, Government investment gone in. It’s a discharge lounge which means people will be able to go in, get home quicker from hospital, which is good for them, but also good for the hospital because it frees up beds so that it means A&E performance, emergency performance and the rest of the hospital will continue to be strong.

“That is already committing and delivering for the people of North Devon when it comes to healthcare.”

Following a petition launched by Ms Saxby calling on the House of Commons to ask the Government to assist with emergency dental provision in North Devon., the Prime Minister was told that people were visiting hospitals because they were unable to see their own dentist.

He was asked whether the Catch Up Dental Plan would be released by the Treasury soon.

The Prime Minister said: “This was the first letter Selaine wrote as an MP so she has been talking about this issue, rightly and passionately, from the day she became an MP.

“I’m aware, and Government is aware about the challenges of dentistry in rural areas. What I can tell you, is that we’re investing record sums nationally in dentistry; £3bn. Overall the amount of dental activity in the last year has gone up over 20% thanks to the reforms that we have made to the dentistry contract and the extra funding, but I get there are particular challenges in rural areas and we’re always going to keep looking at ways to improve people’s accessibility for dentistry.

“One thing we are doing, which is important for people to know, is that we’re investing now to train the dentists of the future. Earlier this year I announced a long-term workforce plan, which we are putting the money now in increasing the number of training places for dentists by around 50% and nobody has ever done anything like that before. That’s not going to help today, but it should give people the comfort that we’re making the right decisions for the long term, so that in the long term, North Devon will have the dentists it needs because I made a decision this year to start training more of them.”

The Prime Minister was then asked about the housing crisis facing the region, with a Devon Task Force recently announcing ‘broken housing markets’ across the county, with a lack of long-term rental properties.

He was asked whether there would be anything in the Autumn Statement to address the inequalities over short term and long term rental.

The Prime Minister replied saying: “First thing to say is that I live in a very rural area, up in North Yorkshire, which is also popular with people who like to come and stay there. I think many of the challenges you face here are ones I’m familiar with personally and indeed something Selaine and I have been talking about since the day she became an MP and I was Chancellor about how best we can address this issue.

“We have taken some steps already. We’re making it possible for councils to charge double council tax on second homes. That is something people have asked for which we are delivering. We are also working through plans which again Selaine has rightly championed about a registration scheme for short-term lets, because that would give councils more control over what’s happening in their areas.

“We have strengthened the local planning process because that allows councils, in their local plan, to designate housing and areas which are for local occupancy.

“It’s hard for me to comment, and I never do about things which may or may not be in the Autumn Statement, but I would say that thanks to the efforts of MPs like Selaine, representing an area that has these types of challenges, the Government is aware of the particular issues, so we can say we have looked and put a series of things in place to help mitigate it.”

Another key issue in the South West, which was pertinent in the Conservative’s loss in the Tiverton & Honiton by election was Tiverton High School.

At the Exeter hustings in 2022, Mr Sunak vowed to get a new school built for the town and he was asked when this may happen.

He responded saying: “My understanding is that Tiverton High School is part of our flagship school rebuilding programme that we have and Tiverton High School has been greenlighted as part of that programme. We are completely committed to it.

“The programme in totality is delivering at the pace that we expected and I don’t have any reason to believe that Tiverton is not progressing as planned through that process. We remain committed to Tiverton High School, it’s part of our flagship school rebuilding programme.”

He was also asked, that following that historic defeat to the Liberal Democrats, and also more recently in the Somerton & Frome by-election as well as gains for the Lib Dems in May’s local elections, why voters should stick with the Conservatives in next year’s expected General Election, and how he planned to win back their trust.

He responded saying: “My job is to delivery on people’s priorities, and my priority is the cost of living and easing the burden on it. We are on track to halve inflation which is the first of my priorities because that is the most important thing we can do to ease the strain on family budgets.

“We are also making progress in other areas like cutting waiting lists and improving NHS performance and this hospital that I’m standing in is a prime example of that.

“I know people want to see more action on tackling illegal migration, this is a difficult issue which can’t be solved overnight. For the first time ever since the small boats crisis emerged, the number’s this year are down on the year before, which shows our plan is working. There is more work to do, but that should give people some comfort.

“The other thing Selaine and I talk about is our commitment to the natural environment and Selaine has done a superb job on making sure that we’ve got an incredibly robust plan to improve our natural environment, particularly our plan for water, which has three parts. It’s about more investment; the water companies are investing £56bn over the coming years, with £2bn happening immediately.

“Also, the Government investing in things like slurry infrastructure grants for farmers to help them improve what they’re doing.

“The second bit is regulation, where we are banning things plastic wet wipes and forever chemicals.

“The last bit is enforcement where we’ve given Ofwat unlimited power for unlimited fines for water companies, and we’ve seen record fines on water companies for the unacceptable behaviour, but also strengthening their power so that water companies can’t pay dividends or bonuses if their environmental performance is not sufficient. We’re also giving more money to the Environment Agency to do inspections.

“So, with more investment, good regulation, and good regulation, and better enforcement, we’ve got a strong plan which will tackle the issue which I know people are concerned about.

“This is partly about what I’m delivering nationally, but we’ve got fantastic local MPs here like Selaine who are doing an incredibly good job for their constituents, and I think people will recognise and reward that.”

Following the visit Selaine Saxby MP said: “It was fantastic to welcome the Prime Minister to North Devon, and the district hospital here has done an incredible job. It was a real pleasure to show him the discharge lounge, a Government initiative using Government funding which is delivering real improvements to the flow of patients through this hospital, and it was a real pleasure to hear from staff who are running these facilities how the discharge facility but also the Jubilee Suite, how well these facilities are working, and the great patient care that they deliver.

“It’s always a real privilege to be able to welcome the Prime Minister. For him to come to the hospital, which is going to be rebuilt, but also we’re going to be working on the housing which is needed for key workers at the hospital.

“It was also good for him to see the fantastic team here, because this hospital is built on an incredible team of staff, and thankyou to all of them. I think he will get the enthusiasm of the staff and patients alike.

She spoke about what she hopes Mr Sunak will take with him from the meeting. She said: “I think some of the figures we gave him about discharge in a rural area and some of the challenges we have in social care up here. The team here at the hospital are doing a fantastic job, we just need to join it up well, which is obviously much harder in a rural community.

“He’s from a rural constituency himself so much of that resonated. I did do a debate with the Prime Minister in Westminster when I described him as being in between jobs on both of our rural hospitals, so I think there is a real understanding on that. I think the numbers he took with him today were quite stark and I very much hope he will work with the hospital trust here on some of the exciting initiatives they have.

“The other one, is the wearable technology. The chief medical officer explained the wearable technology that we’re championing here, which makes a real difference in enabling people to go home and be properly monitored. That’s a great and exciting initiative that perhaps people are not fully aware of and is already happening in North Devon.”

On being questioned why the Prime Minister made a visit, and if it was because the Conservatives were worried about losing the constituency to the challenging Liberal Democrats, Ms Saxby responded: “I think today was all about a big healthcare announcement and getting ready for winter, and therefore he’s come to a fantastic hospital to make that announcement.”

Lower otter restoration project nears completion

One of the biggest coastal climate adaptation and habitat creation projects in England moves a step closer to final completion with the installation of a new 70-metre footbridge.

Chris Collman www.eastdevon.radio

The Lower Otter Restoration Project (LORP) is a partnership initiative between landowners Clinton Devon Estates and the Environment Agency to restore the historic floodplain of the Otter estuary near Budleigh Salterton, East Devon. The Environment Agency managed the development of the scheme, appointing engineering consultant Jacobs to lead the design of the project and contractor Kier to undertake the construction works. Once construction is complete, the 55 hectare site will be managed by the Pebblebed Heaths Conservation Trust.

Over the last week, a new 70-metre footbridge has been craned into place. Work will now commence to remove 70 metres of embankment, which will allow tides to reach a large part of the Otter estuary for the first time in over 200 years.

Installation of the bridge secures continued access along the South West Coast Path following the connection of the historic floodplain to the Otter estuary (please note the South West Coast path will remain temporarily diverted until the end of October to enable completion of works). This work was initially planned for earlier in the year but was postponed to allow breeding birds (who were flocking to make use of the new habitat) to finish nesting in the area that will flood tidally.

The project has already made a positive difference to the local community. During heavy rain in May, South Farm Road, once notorious for flooding, but which has been raised by the scheme, stayed free of the rising water, allowing local businesses to continue trading and residents to move freely. Budleigh Salterton Cricket Club, whose ground in the past was frequently subject to serious flooding, have been playing this season on a new flood-free pitches created as a result of the project, while a new pavilion for the club is nearing completion.

Dr Sam Bridgewater, Director of Environment Strategy and Evidence at Clinton Devon Estates said: “After more than a decade of planning and hard work, it is fantastic to see the project nearing completion. The benefits for people and the planet are already clear to see. It’s really encouraging that a wide variety of bird species have been visiting the site during the construction phase and we look forward to seeing further wildlife gains as the landscape and habitats develop once the lower valley again becomes tidal as it was two hundred years ago.”

Environment Agency Project Manager Dan Boswell reflected: “Undertaking landscape change of this scale is a huge challenge in terms of engineering, the environment and communication. The efforts of the team to rise to these challenges and deliver a fantastic legacy for the local community as well as improving the environment are to be commended. We are already seeing the positive impact for people and wildlife and that will only increase with time.”

Ecologists working on LORP are confident that habitats developing in the newly restored intertidal zone will increase biodiversity. Mud colonised by invertebrates will provide rich feeding grounds for wading birds like black-tailed godwits, dunlin and redshank, while the warm, shallow waters will also be used by many fish, particularly juveniles. Inter-tidal habitats are also well known for being able to store large amounts of carbon, helping to combat the climate crisis.

Members of the public can already enjoy the improvements and the wildlife they have attracted through 3.3km of improved footpath network that is more resilient to flooding as sea levels rise. Seven new viewing areas have also been constructed to enable visitors to enjoy and learn about the new wildlife have also been built with orientation signs, including a map and information on how to help care for the site.

In addition, unsightly overhead power lines that once ran through the site have been buried on both sides of the Otter valley, putting 2.5km of cables below ground. The work was undertaken in partnership with National Grid and the East Devon Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.