South West Water is being asked to justify its “bland” responses on planning applications, given the rise in sewage spills in Devon’s river and coastal waters. Torridge District Council wants the company to be removed from the list of consultees and an independent organisation to oversee new developments.
Alison Stephenson www.devonlive.com
And it plans to ask other councils in Devon to support its request to government. In his motion to the council, Cllr Peter Christie (Green, Bideford North) said he is fed up with SWW’s response of “has no objection” when it is asked to give a view on new plans.
“Over the last decade, this is the answer we get, with very few exceptions. Clearly, given the current state of our rivers and coastal waters there is a major problem – and it appears to be overlooked that SWW have a vested interest in more development as it means more customers locked into paying them, as water and sewage services are a monopoly service.”
He told the council that according to SWW’s website, in Bideford last year there were 24 sewage spills, 31 in Buckleigh, 144 in Abbotsham, 117 at Weare Giffard and 25 in Torrington.
“South West Water will take the money for every new house but are not doing what they should be doing in tackling the infrastructure.”
He said in the late 1970s and 80s a ‘sewage embargo’ was placed on Bideford and house building stopped for several years because the town’s infrastructure couldn’t cope.
“Nothing has really changed, they cannot cope with the sewage capacity and water availability is also an issue when we have a drought.”
Cllr Annie Brenton (Lab, Bideford West) said there is a large new development under construction in Bideford beyond Atlantic Village and the council needs to be “really careful and scrupulous” about planning details for drains and sewerage.
“The welfare of our people and our rivers and our sea is just as important as making money,” Cllr Brenton said.
Cllr Simon Newcombe (Con, Winkleigh) said independent was “all very good” but if it was not legally enforceable it was not worth the money spent on it.
Cllr David Brenton (Lab, Bideford South) said: “We should be getting Ofwat here. They are supposed to be the ones that are regulating and monitoring this, but they don’t.
“They have the teeth, but they don’t use them. It’s a quango of course, we know how loaded they are, but we need to get them here and ask them ‘what are you doing about the spills in our rivers and seas’.”
South West Water responded to DevonLive saying: “South West Water is not a statutory consultee to planning but we are an interested party as a statutory undertaker. We have a duty to support growth and make sure there is adequate capacity in the network.
“Even though we are not a statutory consultee, South West Water does review 30,000 planning applications each year and where we believe it is appropriate, we will add relevant comments on planning applications for consideration by the Planning Authority.
“It is a requirement under building regulations to ensure full separation of foul and surface water for any new property that is built and this would fall to the Local Authority to respond to.
“To support the ongoing conversation between South West Water, North Devon District Council and Torridge Council, an initial workshop between officers was held in October to explore how we can work better together to ensure well informed decision making and add further value to the planning process. It was agreed at this meeting that in the interests of sharing information and knowledge, this group will continue to meet regularly.
“We continuously review our approach to ensure we provide robust responses to planning applications and we will be contacting Councillor Christie to discuss his concerns.”
We have to remember that when our statutory undertakers were government bodies we could rely upon their consultation responses to draft Local Plans and indeed on individual planning applications.
SWW is no longer that but is a publicly quoted business called Pennon with shareholders so we should stop referring to SWW but refer to Pennon PLC.
Pennon plc is no longer a statutory consultee on individual applications only on draft Local Plans. So we have a gap in availability of technical information being supplied to the LPA ‘s which has not been replaced by any other body AND Pennon is not a consultee on individual applications.
It seems to me that we have to question whether anything that Pennon says in response to draft Local Plans can be relied upon and that there needs to be another body responsible for water related information provision on individual applications.
RC Jones FRICS
LikeLike