Discredited Tory police commissioner hangs on because big anti-Tory majority splits its votes

Discredited Tory police commissioner hangs on because big anti-Tory majority splits its votes

Martin Shaw posts on Seaton & Colyton matters:

It’s a big disappointment that Alison Hernández, the Conservative Devon & Cornwall police commissioner, has been re-elected with 131,000 votes to 107,000 for Labour and 64,000 for the Lib Dems.

This is a clear lesson here for the General Election – there is a clear anti-Tory majority in our region (171,000 to 131,000 in this case) and we can remove most of their MPs. But if we split our votes between two or three opposition candidates in a constituency, the Tories will survive.

www.devonandcornwall-pcc.gov.uk/news-and-blog/multimedia-hub/alison-hernandez-has-been-returned-as-police-and-crime-commissioner-for-devon-and-cornwall-for-a-third-term-after-winning-a-majority-of-xxxx-votes/

Brixington By-election – split opposition lets Tories retain seat on 38% of the vote

See below for Owl’s analysis

East Devon District Council – By-election 2 May 2024

Declaration of results for East Devon District Council Exmouth Brixington Ward 2 May 2024

Exmouth Brixington

Name of CandidateDescription (if any)Number of votesElected?
BAILEY Aurora EConservative Party Candidate586elected
BENNETT, JulieThe Labour Party339 
CONDUIT, DianneLiberal Democrats513 
ROSSER, Michael JThe Green Party136 

Electorate: 6110
Ballot Papers Issued: 1593
Rejected Ballot Papers: 19
Turnout: 26%

Here is an analysis of Thurday’s result, compared to the full council elections held last year (see below).

Analysis: Similar turnout, but Thursday’s winner Aurora Bailey, in 2023, stood as an “Independent”. On Thursday she won with only  38% of the vote.

The 2023 election was for three councillors, electors had three votes. This Thursday’s election was for only one councillor and electors had one vote. The significant difference is the fall in the votes cast for the Green and Labour candidates. 

The conclusion Owl reaches is that if the “anything but Tory” majority really wants to do business in a straight fight under the first past the post system. Only the Lib Dems offer a viable alternative.

Council Exmouth Brixington Ward 4 May 2023

Name of CandidateDescription (if any)Number of votesElected?
BAILEY Aurora EIndependent518 
CAYGILL FredConservative Party Candidate673Yes
CHAPMAN MaddyConservative Party Candidate734Yes
COLMAN AndrewLiberal Democrats579 
KIRVAN Ian DIndependent471 
MARRETT G MalcolmGreen Party Candidate434 
NICHOLAS CherryConservative Party Candidate662Yes
WICKENDEN JamieLabour Party559 

Electorate: 6143
Ballot Papers Issued: 1743
Rejected Ballot Papers: 3
Turnout: 28.4%

Sunak to allow oil and gas exploration at sites intended for offshore wind

Tories in retreat continue their “Scorched-Earth” policy – Owl

Fossil fuel companies will be allowed to explore for oil and gas under offshore wind-power sites for the first time, the government will announce on Friday, in a move that campaigners said is further proof that ministers are abandoning the climate agenda.

Helena Horton www.theguardian.com 

The North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA), which regulates North Sea oil and gas production, will confirm that it is granting licences to about 30 companies to look for hydrocarbons on sites earmarked for future offshore windfarms.

The move has brought renewed criticism of Rishi Sunak from environmentalists, including from the prime minister’s own former net zero tsar, who worry that any future oil and gas production could hamper clean energy generation.

But it will also give the embattled prime minister a welcome piece of news to sell to his restive backbenchers – many of whom are keen to see more oil and gas production in the North Sea – the day after what are set to be a bruising set of local election results.

Chris Skidmore, the former Conservative MP who recently quit as Sunak’s net zero champion in protest at the government’s climate policies, said: “With a general election just months away, this is a deeply irresponsible and divisive move that goes against all advice from the International Energy Agency or the UN, and regrettably will further set back the UK’s climate reputation.

“Instead of wind powering new oil, the investment should instead be in more wind and renewables. More fossil fuels will only create stranded assets and stranded jobs at a time when demand for oil and gas is falling.”

He added: “This is a political and cynical stunt that will only backfire … We need to stop playing politics with climate and people’s future, and take a grownup position on seeking to find consensus for an end date to new oil and gas.”

A spokesperson for the NSTA said: “The NSTA have worked closely with other regulators to consider matters of co-location with offshore wind and other users.”

Sources say that the oil exploration itself will not involve any drilling, with companies largely using data to decide whether sites have the potential to be profitable for extraction.

Supporters of the scheme add that if any of the sites under windfarms prove suitable for production, oil and gas platforms will be able to use power from the wind turbines to lower their emissions. They will also have to strike an agreement with windfarm operators before they can begin drilling.

Experts say, however, that the emissions from burning any oil and gas produced will far outweigh whatever is saved in the drilling and extraction processes. They add that Friday’s announcement is likely to undermine investor confidence in Britain’s green energy sector as a whole.

The Guardian understands that investors in offshore wind have already expressed concern to the government about the decision, even threatening to pull out of the UK clean power sector altogether.

Doug Parr, policy director at Greenpeace UK, said: “It’s hard to think of a worse use of clean electricity from windfarms than powering the dirty industry that’s driving the climate crisis. It’s like using a nicotine patch to roll a cigarette.”

Sunak has made a series of announcements since becoming prime minister to roll back the government’s climate policies, including delaying the end of new sales of petrol and diesel cars and giving the green light for the huge new Rosebank oilfield off the coast of Shetland.

The prime minister has said the policies are part of a push to bring energy costs down and improve energy security. But his critics believe Sunak is using them as a dividing issue between the Conservatives and Labour going into this year’s general election.

Last month, Chris Stark, the outgoing head of the Climate Change Committee, accused the prime minister of abandoning Britain’s reputation as a world leader in the fight against the climate crisis.

Sunak, however, is also under pressure from Tory rebels, with the party more than 20 points behind in the polls and heading for heavy losses after Thursday’s local elections. A group of unhappy backbenchers is planning a move to unseat him altogether if the Tories lose the mayoralties in both the Tees Valley and the West Midlands this weekend.

No 10 has been working for weeks on a fightback plan to ward off any potential coup, and sources have told the Guardian the prime minister is likely to put his energy policies at the heart of any offer he makes to get his own MPs back on side.

Friday’s announcement marks the third phase in the 33rd round of North Sea oil and gas licensing. Earlier this year the government gave licences to 17 companies to look for hydrocarbons, including Shell, Equinor, BP, Total and Neo.

This phase differs from previous ones, however, because officials are opening up parts of the sea which have been leased to offshore wind operators for the first time. The government issues about 100 licences a year, only 2% of which go on to receive consent for production.

Dan McGrail, the chief executive of the trade body RenewableUK, said: “Prioritising offshore wind over oil and gas isn’t just the right choice for the planet, but given renewables are the lowest-cost means of generating power, we should be doing this for bill payers.”

Parr said: “Most of the planet-heating emissions from oil and gas rigs come from burning the polluting fuels, not extracting them.

“At best, this will make a small dent in the carbon footprint of a few oil companies’ operations. But more likely than not, it will end up greenwashing the fossil fuel industry’s image just as the government keeps trying to expand extraction against the advice of leading scientists and experts.”

A spokesperson for the energy department said: “To strengthen our energy security and grow the economy, we want to maximise the huge energy potential of the North Sea.

“We will continue to need oil and gas over the coming decades as we increase our share of renewables; that’s why we welcome the work by the NSTA and the Crown Estates to facilitate the co-location of wind and oil and gas projects as the offshore space gets busier.”

Clyst valley park could double in size

Proposals to double the amount of accessible space in Clyst Valley Regional Park will be put before residents.

Clyst Valley Regional Park (Image:East Devon District Council/LDRS)

Bradley Gerrard, local democracy reporter www.radioexe.co.uk

The park, effectively created by the Green Infrastructure Strategy in 2009, provides a buffer between Exeter and the countryside and, crucially, offers residents usable green space from nearby towns and villages in East Devon.

At present, 762 hectares is accessible but East Devon District Council has created plans to increase this by a further 740 hectares over 25 years – almost doubling the existing amount.

Under the proposals, a range of green spaces will be linked by greenways, or accessible routes through the countryside, for pedestrians and cyclists.

And less accessible areas will also be promoted in a bid to enhance the area’s biodiversity.

A large proportion of the regional park lies within the National Trust’s Killerton Estate, while 40 per cent of it is within a floodplain.

Members of the council’s strategic planning committee voted in favour of the plans going out to consultation, which should happen this month and last for six weeks.

Other key aspects of the proposals include the removal of some areas from the existing regional park boundary, including Cranbrook, Clyst St Mary and the Enterprise Zone where development has been implemented.

However, the proposals take into account the prospective new development south of Clyst Honiton and west of Aylesbeare.

The regional park expansion proposals say that the community between the A3052 and the A30 will include spaces and routes that will ultimately form part of the park, albeit these will be determined through a separate master plan.

A small number of sites within the current boundary are being promoted for development, and these are still being assessed.

Councillor Geoff Jung (Liberal Democrat, Woodbury and Lympstone), the portfolio holder for coast, country and environment, said he was a “great supporter” of the park and welcomed the expansion proposals.

“The park is designed to protect the countryside and improve access to it around the new towns,” he said.

“At the same time as we’re building new houses, we have to provide access to the countryside and this project does exactly that, so I hope councillors support it.”

The strategic planning committee chair, Olly Davey (Green Party, Exmouth Town), also praised the plan’s inclusion of the new community and its links to the park.

“Given what Mr Freeman was saying about the new community and routes through it that will form part of the regional park, maybe for once we are getting those allocated first before the new development of homes,” he said.

“It looks like for once we’re getting that right, and we’ll make sure we get the other bits of the new community right in the same way.

“This is something members have often called for, and it looks like that will happen, so these plans are to be welcomed.”

Broken Sewer Discharge pipe at Maer Rocks – what is happening next door in Budleigh? Multiple issues?

Kier is to start work in the Lime Kiln Car Park on behalf of South West Water for 5 days from 13/05/24.

For weeks tankers have been ferrying “Non Hazardous” liquids through the Town, destination unknown but assumed to be Exmouth.

Jodie McDonald reports on ESCAPE:

Budleigh Today, when I asked a member of EDDC what they were doing the response was “Sewage problems, lots of issues apparently” 🙄 they were there the whole time we were, leaving and coming back.

From Owl’s researches it would seem that the failure of sewage discharge pipes into the sea, most of which are of Victorian origin, is nothing new:

Budleigh Salterton Sewage Outfall, Local Government Board Inquiry 1903.

This records a 1903 inquiry into whether a storm broken sewer pipe should be extended prompting this letter to the press:

“As to the sewer outfall, after a public inquiry by a Government official, the Local Government. Board refused to sanction the scheme the local authority put before them, and advised the calling in of an engineer. This The Council have refused to do, and, although they know the danger is great, and increasing year by year, they will do nothing further until a zymotic plague enters the place, which is calculated to seriously injure the reputation of a health resort.”

Are the pipes at Maer Rocks 150 years old?

Robin Bush in “The Book of Exmouth” records that “The Board of Health” built new sewers in 1861 adding an outfall at Maer Rocks, completed in 1883, further schemes were required in 1899 and again in 1932. The Board of Health was replaced by the Exmouth Urban District Council in 1894.

How much of the current pipework dates from 1883?

“The pipe is where we expected it to be” (it’s just broken)

Latest reports on the Maer Rocks overflow pipes

Geoff Crawford

I cannot tell you everything I know as I do not want to compromise the Environment Agency ongoing investigation into SWW but I do want to provide an update following last weeks dye test by SWW.

I was fortunate to actually be there during the test on the first day.

SWW did not tell ESCAPE about the second day of tests so we missed that. An admin error they say but fortunately one of our members stopped by on his walk and witnessed most of it.

As I was actually physically present for several hours, spoke with the senior SWW engineer and the EA guy at length and was there when the dye came out of the broken pipe I know exactly what occurred, what was said and the views of both the senior SWW engineer and the EA representative.

You may have seen statements published by the Exmouth Journal and DevonLive last week issued by SWW to say that they had completed the promised dye test to locate the Maer Road Sewage Pumping Station emergency and storm overflow pipe location.

They stated things like the pipe was where they expected it to be and was operating as they expected and was located within the permitted area so all was well.

The Exmouth Journal and DevonLive (part of the same media group who regularly post paid for articles from SWW written as if they are real news articles) presumably published (both have now been removed) the SWW statements without crosschecking them or asking EA for their view on the situation.

Similar statements were sent by SWW to Exmouth Town Council, East Devon District Council and Simon Jupp MP. Fortunately those organisations are in contact with ESCAPE and EA and they chose to check the facts of the matter before simply promoting SWW point of view.

It is very interesting that SWW have not published these statements themselves but only offered them to others to publish on their behalf.

The Environmental Agency is undertaking an investigation of the Maer Road / Maer Rocks overflow pipe to determine in SWW breached its permit and so illegally overflowed sewage and caused pollution. They are investigating why SWW, though they knew that the pipe was broken, had not self reported this to EA and had not worked quicker to investigate it and repair it. EA are investigating if the end of the pipe or indeed the break in the pipe is at its permit stated location. If not it is potentially in breach of its permit and a new permit may be required.

EA are investigating if the several hundred tankers of sewage that were dumped into Maer Road SPS across December 23 and hence spilled out through this broken pipe whilst the SPS was already overflowing were hence “wilful pollution”.

EA are investigating if, as was stated by a SWW contractor to David Parsley of iNews, that a storm pump at Maer Road SPS had failed and had been failed for some time, making all overflows during that period illegal.

This pumping station and its location and cause of overflows is central to Jo Batemans legal claim for loss of amenity against SWW and the outcome of the EA investigation will surely have an impact on that claim.

So its no surprise that SWW are trying to get their story out, their narrative, their version of the truth and have that published by ETC, EDDC, Exmouth Journal, DevonLive, Simon Jupp MP. Its no surprise that SWW want you to believe that they broke no rules, all is well, all is within permit and they want to get that out before the Environment Agency have chance to properly review the facts, the results and to come to a proper considered conclusion.

It is the Environment Agency that issues the permits. It is the Environment Agency that will decide if the Maer Road SPS overflow pipe has breached those permit conditions and it is the Environment Agency that we should listen to and believe. The EA are the police acting to protect the public and holding criminals to account. Listen to the EA, publish their findings, not SWWs alternative truth.

I am pleased to say that many now understand that what SWW tell them is not necessarily the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Now people are asking questions, checking SWW statements, no longer blindly believing and repeating their propaganda. Hopefully the tide is turning and its not just the public that can see the subterfuge of SWW. Do not believe everything you read in the papers.