Brixham: Cryptosporidium confirmed as illness sweeps town

The UK Health Security Agency has confirmed 16 cases of cryptosporidium and around 70 reported cases of diarrhoea and vomiting in Brixham – with more cases reported by victims on social media

Anita Merritt www.devonlive.com

The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) has confirmed there has been an outbreak of infection cryptosporidium in Brixham, but it has not yet been able to establish the cause of it. So far it says there have been 16 confirmed cases of the illness, with more expected, and around 70 reported cases of diarrhoea and vomiting in residents in the seaside town.

Earlier today, DevonLive reported it was believed hundreds of people in Brixham had become unwell according to comments on social media. Residents have shared how they have been poorly for days and the detrimental impact it is having on their lives.

Cryptosporidiosis is predominantly a waterborne disease and infections can be caused by drinking contaminated water or swallowing contaminated water in swimming pools or streams. It can also be acquired by animal and human contact.

South West Water (SWW) assured earlier today that the tests it has carried out on the quality of drinking water in Brixham have currently all come back clear. It has since stated it is advising residents to continue to use their water as normal and that it is continuing to review water supplies.

UKHSA says its investigation into the source is ongoing and those who have reported symptoms are being contacted for further information as part of investigations into a source. It has issued advice to help halt the spread of the infection.

Sarah Bird, consultant in health protection at UKHSA South West said: “We would like to reassure the public that we are working closely with partners to investigate the possible source of infection and put control measures in place. Further possible cases are under investigation and more cases are anticipated.

“At this stage, a source has not been identified, and more information will be shared as soon as it is available. For most people, cryptosporidium symptoms can be managed at home without medical advice.

“Symptoms include watery diarrhoea, stomach pains, dehydration, weight loss and fever, which can last for two to three weeks. Anyone can get cryptosporidiosis, but it is most common in young children aged between one and five years and most healthy people will recover fully.

“Anyone with a diarrhoeal illness should drink plenty of water to prevent dehydration and if they have severe symptoms like bloody diarrhoea, they should contact NHS 111 or their GP surgery. Please stay off school and work for 48 hours since the last episode of illness and away from swimming pools for 14 days after the last episode of illness.”

The UK Health Security Agency South West is working with Torbay Council, South West Water, NHS Devon and the Environment Agency to investigate the cause.

A South West Water spokesperson said: “We are working with UKHSA and other partners supporting their investigation into a number of cases of cryptosporidium in the Brixham area. As part of this, we have reviewed the operation of our water treatment works and the water quality data from those sites which show us there have been no issues with the treated water.

“As agreed today with public health partners, we are carrying out further monitoring of the local supply area and we’ll continue working closely with them on their investigation. We are advising customers to continue to use their water as normal. We will keep this under review.”

It is believed that many of the cases are affecting people who live in Higher Brixham. Tanya Matthews, who lives within that area in Ocean View, claims every home in her street has come down with the same symptoms.

Tanya, who has been suffering from stomach cramps and diarrhoea for the past nine days and is awaiting a cryptosporidium test, said: “I started having stomach cramps and explosive diarrhoea nine days ago and it has been the same every day since. I started to feel a little bit better yesterday then today [May 14] it hit me again.

“I rang SWW yesterday [May 13] and I was told there had been 15 confirmed cases of cryptosporidium and that UKHSA are looking into it as they don’t believe it’s to do with the water.

“They wouldn’t expect this many cases over a whole year for all of Devon and Cornwall so something is amiss. SWW asked if I had been in the sea or a river but I have not. I also think the water tastes funny and it has been leaving a horrid taste in my mouth.”

Yesterday, May 13, Tanya put a post on Brixham Fish Town Facebook to see how many other people had also been affected. It is had more than 1,000 comments with many reporting they are also unwell.

A resident who lives in Hillhead, Brixham and asked not to be named, has told how she has been bed-bound for over a week and has tested positive for cryptosporidium by her doctor.

She said: “I’ve been bed-bound for eight days with sickness and diarrhoea and have been signed off work for two weeks and lost over a stone in weight. It’s the worst illness I’ve ever experienced.”

Further health advice has been issued by Torbay Council. Dr Lincoln Sargeant, director of Public Health at Torbay Council said: “We are working with partners to investigate the source of this outbreak. We advise that people wash their hands thoroughly when handling food and after using the toilet to help prevent the spread of further infection.

“Please follow the advice to stay away from nursery, school and work for 48 hours since the last episode of illness and do not swim for two weeks after being unwell.”

Advice about cryptosporidium can be found by clicking here.

By the smallest of margins – Monday

The Commons defeated a government-led motion and voted to ban MPs from the parliamentary estate if they have been arrested on suspicion of violent or sexual offences.

Richard Foord voted on the side of the angels but no vote was recorded for Simon Jupp.  

LAST NIGHT [MONDAY] IN THE COMMONS www.politico.eu

ALL PART OF THE PLAN: After facing days of attacks from her new Labour colleagues, Natalie Elphicke may just have found a route to redemption. Elphicke’s vote (arguably) made all the difference on Monday night as the Commons defeated a government-led motion and voted to ban MPs from the parliamentary estate if they have been arrested on suspicion of violent or sexual offences. The free vote could not have been closer, finishing 170-169. Labour and Lib Dem MPs cheered it to the rafters.

What happened? The House of Commons Commission had — twice — recommended a panel should be set up to consider banning MPs from parliament if they had been arrested for a violent or sexual offence. Opposition MPs were deeply unhappy when the government instead proposed a much higher bar — the point an MP is actually charged with such an offence. But it was still assumed in SW1 that the motion, led by Commons Leader Penny Mordaunt, would sail through the Commons with the government’s tacit support, even though it was a free vote in parliament and there was no whipping operation in force.

Not so fast: But more than 150 Tory MPs took advantage of the non-whipped vote to simply not show up. And an amendment by Lib Dem MP Wendy Chamberlain and Labour MP Jess Phillips to bring in a ban from the point of arrest attracted the support of the vast majority of Labour, Lib Dem and SNP MPs, along with a group of eight Conservatives — including Theresa May. 

Sliding doors: You can make a strong argument that Elphicke’s vote won the day, given the knife-edge margin of victory. Even Conservative aides admitted on Monday night that Elphicke would have been very unlikely to vote for a Lib Dem-Labour tie-up on parliamentary standards a week ago, back when she was still a right-wing Tory. All this, of course, comes days after Elphicke faced allegations (which she denies) of trying to get the ex-attorney general to intervene in her ex-husband’s court case for sexual assault.

The big picture: Much more importantly, of course, the result is a big win for parliamentary campaigners who have long decried the lack of safeguards against accused sex offenders. In an impassioned speech during the debate, Phillips said that just prior to the vote she had met with two women who had been raped by MPs. “That’s a fairly standard day for me,” she said.

Successful collab: Chamberlain said the vote was “an important step towards making parliament a safe and modern place to work.” She added: “It is not about the guilt or innocence of any individual MP, but about safeguarding.” Phillips posted her shock on X after the vote, writing: “Shit! We won the vote by 1.”

Full list of MPs who voted:

Risked-based exclusion: amendment (o): Recent Votes www.theyworkforyou.com

Aye 169 No 168

Aye: A-Z by last name

Tellers

No: A-Z by last name

Tellers

‘The spectacle in the sky on Saturday and a new start for EDDC’

 Paul Arnott.

Did all you readers of the Herald and Journal publications enjoy the aurora borealis over East Devon? Yes, neither did I.

Like thousands of others on Saturday morning, I put the kettle on, and checked my phone only to see local Facebook pages bursting with images of the kind of night sky displays you’d normally have to cruise to Norway to see. The more I swiped up, the more I realised that my decision not to pass out on the sofa at the end of a busy week but to tuck up in bed at a respectable time instead, had caused me to miss a spectcle we may never see again this far south in my lifetime.

It’s a classic little boy called wolf story. How many dozens of times had we stayed up for a predicted solar eclipse or a meteor shower only to witness a cloudy night with nothing whatsoever to see? It was in this cynical spirit that I lay my head on my pillow last Friday, only to miss a spectacle which three thousand years ago would have had ancient peoples cartwheeling around Stonehenge.

Back then ancient folk might have ascribed immense meaning to the spectacle, optimists predicting the beginning of a new era, pessimists predicting some great doom yet to come. Modern science has denied us all these mumbo-jumbo interpretations but for me, having now absorbed glorious images of multiple church towers in East Devon set against a pallet of pinks and mauves, it will always help me remember a propitious week at work.

I was extremely honoured last week to be re-elected by the majority of councillors at East Devon District Council to be its Leader for a fifth year. In June, the council will celebrate 50 years since it was set up and until I became Leader in 2020, the role had always been filled by a Conservative.

I do realise that for many readers this will not be gripping current affairs news up there with a hard right Tory MP defecting to Labour, but it is worth noting. I have always believed in my more than a quarter century living in East Devon and Exeter that it is a moderate place, centrist, more liberal-minded than patronising metropolitan stereotypes portray. In district elections in 2019 and in 2023, that’s how the majority voted, and in 2022 in a national parliamentary election too when Richard Foord was elected.

To be frank, however, much more important than my taking on the leadership for year five, on the same evening we appointed a new Chief Executive, Tracy Hendren. The excellent Tracy had won the job against an impressive 20 applicants in an exhausting and rigorous process. This really is a moment to celebrate.

It is the first time this crucial role for the people of East Devon has changed hands in more than two decades. That was a time when the way senior officers dealt with looking into both a planning scandal eleven years ago, and an enquiry into a failure to safeguard in 2016 after ex-councillor John Humphreys had been arrested on sex crime charges against young persons, concerned thousands of local people, not least me!

Those officers no longer work at East Devon. We now have a fresh and reinvigorated new management, and we begin again. I fully expect some very challenging matters to emerge from hidden recesses, but we have the leadership at both councillor and officer level to deal with it. I may have missed the aurora borealis, but for me the sky over East Devon looks a look clearer now.

United Utilities ordered to publish secret sewage spill data

Five more refusenik water companies could also be forced to reveal details on the discharge of raw sewage after a ruling by the information watchdog including South West Water.

Adam Vaughan www.thetimes.co.uk

The data watchdog has ordered a water company to release secret figures that could reveal illegal sewage spills, paving the way for five other firms to be forced to do the same.

In a victory for The Times’s Clean it Up campaign, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) ruled that United Utilities must share data showing the start and stop times of raw sewage discharges in 2022.

Cross-referenced with weather data, the information could reveal evidence of “dry spills”, the illegal practice of releasing raw sewage into rivers and seas when there has been no heavy rainfall.

Dry spilling is more environmentally damaging because there is no rain water to dilute the pollution and river levels might be lower on dry days. It could put swimmers at risk too, since they are more likely to go in on dry days, which are usually considered safer.

A lawyer at one of the six firms refusing to share the data — Anglian Water, Northumbrian Water, Severn Trent Water, South West Water, United Utilities and Yorkshire Water — had argued that it was so complex that “it is the regulators and not the press or the public” that should see it.

Several of the companies argued that their secrecy was justified because releasing the information would prejudice a joint investigation by the Environment Agency and Ofwat, the water industry regulator.

However, the ICO has ruled against United Utilities. Given that the times and locations of sewage spills was “purely factual information”, the data watchdog said it was “struggling” to see how its publication could obstruct the investigation.

David Black, the chief executive of Ofwat, had publicly said his investigation was not a reason to keep the figures secret, the ICO noted. Moreover, it said there was no evidence the water firm had asked the regulators if sharing the information would prejudice their investigation.

Another reason for ordering the data be made public was a recent appeal tribunal ruling in favour of Steve Lavelle, a campaigner who sought data from Northumbrian Water on sewage dumping in the sea at Whitburn, South Tyneside.

In light of that case and the failure of United Utilities to explain how the regulators’ investigation would be affected, the watchdog demanded it publish the data within 35 days. “It’s not in dispute that dry spillages have occurred,” the watchdog said. “The start and stop times won’t give any indication of how these dry spills will be considered by either regulator or what action might be taken as a result of the investigations.”

United Utilities, which serves the northwest of England including Liverpool, Manchester and the Lake District, claimed that releasing the data would amount to “inappropriate sharing of information”. It also warned it could lead to “misinterpretation” and was “disproportionate” to share the figures for its 2,000-plus sewage outfalls.

James Wallace, head of the charity River Action, said: “When someone deliberately withholds information, it is usually because they have something to hide. Bearing in mind the risk to rivers of ecological collapse and spread of infectious diseases to humans by the release of untreated sewage, the ICO ruling on water companies sharing raw sewage discharge data is essential.”

The data watchdog has issued a decision against only United Utilities, which twice refused to release the figures to The Times. However, because it dismantled the same argument used by the five other water companies, similar decisions are expected against them imminently, forcing them to release the data.

The companies could choose to appeal in a final attempt to keep the information secret.

A United Utilities spokeswoman said: “We note the ICO’s decision notice and we are considering our next steps.”

An Environment Agency spokesperson said: “As a regulator, we aim to be transparent and evidence-based; we expect the water industry to do the same.”

The Times is demanding faster action to improve the country’s waterways. Find out more about the Clean It Up campaign.