Reform turns to the “Voodoo” economics of Liz Truss to promise us all something for nothing

Meanwhile, after blowing their chance to form alliances in Cornwall as the largest party, here at Devon our new Reformers demonstrated lack of preparation for serious government by throwing their teddies out of the pram at the Annual Meeting.

For example: after the Annual Meeting, Cllr Neil Stevens (Alphington & Cowick) ranted on facebook:

Democracy? What a Joke.

Thursday, I stood up to protest the undemocratic stitch-up in Devon – and was shut down for not following ‘procedure’. Reform UK came second, yet we’ve been completely locked out of the Cabinet. Why? Because they fear us.”

His problem is that, according to the video at approx 2hrs 15mins, he chose to do this under the “declaration of interests” section of the meeting.

Having been in the Army he ought to be used to following rules.

He continued railing against Jess Bailey’s formal agenda motion to install swift boxes on County Hall and appears to have missed Cllr Julian Brazil’s announcement that his priorities were vulnerable children – the big spend on education, SEND and social services – and fixing roads.

What are his priorities?

“After rigging the committee, they spent 40 minutes talking about bird boxes with music. Meanwhile, Devon faces real problems.”

The time to show seriousness and negotiate was before the meeting.

Farage’s pledges to slash taxes don’t add up, top economists warn

Archie Mitchell www.independent.co.uk

Nigel Farage’s promise to slash taxes if he wins the next general election does not add up, Britain’s top economic think tank has warned.

The Reform UK leader on Tuesday touted plans to hike the threshold for paying income tax and restore winter fuel payments for pensioners as he declared the party as the “true party of workers”.

But, just hours after the arch-Brexiteer’s speech, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said his plans would cost tens of billions of pounds and he had failed to say how they would be funded.

Senior economist Stuart Adam told the BBC’s World at One programme that Reform’s plans to hike the income tax threshold from £12,500 to £20,000 “dwarfed” his other announcements, which included getting rid of the two-child benefit cap and the full restoration of winter fuel payments.

He said the tax threshold plan would cost between £50bn and £80bn and warned that “if they’re going to be a party of government, they would have to make those numbers add up”.

Mr Adam said: “Those are all significant things, and they are high-profile new public announcements, but actually, they are all still dwarfed by some of the big policies that were in the manifesto last year, and today Nigel Farage recommitted to increasing the income tax allowance to £20,000, which depending on details might cost £50billion, £60 billion, £70 billion, £80 billion, relative to other policies where we might be talking £1 billion, £2 billion, £3 billion each.

“So the big story is still those very big tax cuts and how they would ultimately be paid for.”

He added that the announcements by Mr Farage this morning were much smaller than last year’s “very radical” manifesto published by Reform UK for the general election.

“As it stands, I don’t think they have really set out how they would pay for such big giveaways,” Mr Adam said. “Of course, they don’t have to do that yet, we’re not yet at a general election. But at some point, if they’re going to be a party of government, they would have to make those numbers add up.”

Asked on Tuesday how his plans would be paid for, Mr Farage promised Reform would save money by slashing the net-zero agenda and cutting the bill to house asylum seekers in hotels and elsewhere.

Together, the measures would save up to £50bn per year, he claimed. Mr Farage added that Reform could save £7bn per year by cutting the amount spent on arms-length government bodies, or quangos, if it won the next election.

Overall, Mr Farage said the plans would save £350bn over the course of a parliament.

He added: “You can argue about numbers adding up, you can probably argue that at no point in the history of any form of government has anybody ever thought the numbers added up.

“We take a fresh approach to everything. I think what I’ve done today is to give you an idea of the direction of policy, of priorities, of what we think is important, what we think it is going to cost and how we think we’re going to pay for it.

“I don’t think anybody at this stage, with a general election some years away, could frankly do more than that. And I believe what I have presented today is credible.”

Labour attacked Mr Farage’s “fantasy promises” and compared the Reform leader to Liz Truss, warning that he would devastate the finances of families across Britain.

Labour chair Ellie Reeves said: “Those families don’t need to be told what the consequences would be of this nonsense. They live through it every month through the higher mortgages, higher rents, higher prices, and higher bills inflicted upon them by the last government.”

She insisted Labour is delivering in government, warning that “all Reform offer is a return to the chaos of Liz Truss”.

The Maids Moreton dilemma: More Houses or Pump More Sewage into the Great Ouse

Angela, time to follow Thérèse Coffey, put your Marigolds on and start scrubbing. – Owl

Battle begins over new homes approved in historic village without sewage capacity

By Joe Crowley www.bbc.co.uk (Extract)

On the edge of Buckingham in southern England, the quiet and leafy village of Maids Moreton, dotted with thatched cottages, is at the heart of a dilemma.

There is a plan – already granted permission – to add 153 new homes to the existing community of 350 houses, a medieval church and a pub.

But the local sewage works has been over capacity for years, and there is no sign of it being upgraded soon.

A choice is looming over what to do if the planned new homes are built.

Leave them standing empty, waiting for upgrades to the wastewater treatment system before they are connected?

Or connect them anyway and let people move in – contributing towards Buckinghamshire Council’s target for new homes, but increasing the sewage pollution of the nearby river, the Great Ouse?

“You wouldn’t dream of building a house that you couldn’t connect to electricity, or that was never going to connect to a road. But for some reason we’re building houses that have nowhere to treat the sewage,” says Kate Pryke, one of the local residents campaigning to prevent the development being built.

Maids Moreton’s dilemma is an increasingly common one across England – as ageing sewage works, water industry under-investment and chronic pollution in many areas appear to threaten the government’s ambitious plans to build 1.5 million homes this parliament…..

…..”We think the problem is rife across England and Wales,” says Justin Neal, solicitor at Wildfish, an environmental charity that campaigns against river pollution.

The charity has been granted permission for a judicial review at the High Court, challenging Buckinghamshire Council’s decision to grant planning permission for the Maids Moreton development.

It says the case goes to the heart of the gap between plans for new housing and the capacity of the existing sewage infrastructure…….

Read on here