Owl thinks this gives “Tractor Porn” Neil notoriety when he was nothing more than a fool and should be left in obscurity.

How would readers rank him as a constituency MP alongside the likes of neighbouring Hugo Swire or his successor Simon Jupp?

All best forgotten.

He resigned for a particularly naughty reason

Lewis Clarke www.devonlive.com

Neil Parish, the former Conservative MP forced to resign after admitting to watching pornography in the House of Commons, has been ranked among the “ten worst modern British politicians” by Daily Mail writer Dan Hodges.

Dan published his list on Thursday, August 28, describing Parish as “the most obscure politician on the list” but one who had squandered what should have been a “job for life”.

Mr Parish represented Tiverton and Honiton from 2010 until 2022, when he resigned following the scandal. At the time of his re-election in 2019, he held a majority of 24,000, making the seat one of the safest Conservative strongholds in the country.

In his column he wrote: “The most obscure politician on the list. And if he’d had the slightest bit of political nous, the former member for Tiverton would still be lounging in blissful obscurity. Re-elected in 2019 to the granite-safe Tory seat with an unassailable majority of 24,000 he had a job for life.

“But the ex-farmer had other ideas. In April 2022 he was accused by a female colleague who had witnessed him watching pornography in the Commons chamber.

“A more cynical – some might say accomplished – political operator would have denied the charge.

“Not Neil Parish.

“Looking for images of a combine harvester called “The Dominator” he had, he said, “reached another website with a very similar name,” whereupon he “watched for a bit”.

“Parish resigned and in the by-election that followed the Lib Dems snatched the seat with the biggest swing in parliamentary history.”

Mr Parish’s inclusion on the list places him alongside a range of political figures past and present, including Boris Johnson, Liz Truss, Ed Miliband, Nick Clegg, Peter Mandelson, Suella Braverman, Keir Starmer, Theresa May and Sue Gray.

Since leaving Parliament, Mr Parish has launched a podcast on farming and environmental issues and has continued to campaign with local Conservatives in Devon.

What lies behind the reorganisation into mega councils? Not a lot!

Plymouth and Exeter’s self interest “go it alone” unitary bids will likely wipe out any benefits from Angela Rayner’s devolution reorganisation plans.

Here’s why:

Latest analysis shows “that splitting county areas into unitary councils with populations as small as 300,000 will create hundreds of millions of new unsustainable costs for local taxpayers”. – Owl

Joshua Nevett www.bbc.co.uk

The UK government did not do its own analysis of the cost of the biggest reorganisation of councils in England for decades, the BBC has learned.

Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said “a significant amount of money” could be saved by merging councils in 21 areas into single authorities.

Rayner’s department, the ministry of local government, based its cost estimates on a 2020 report commissioned by the County Council Network (CCN) that said £2.9bn could be saved over five years.

But the CCN has since revised its analysis and now says the reorganisation could make no savings and actually cost money in some scenarios.

Tim Oliver, chairman of the CCN, said local government reorganisation “could unlock billions in efficiency savings to be reinvested in frontline services”, if it was delivered at the right scale.

Oliver said the CCN supported the government’s reforms but added: “We are concerned over the potential costs of reorganisation where proposals seek to replace the two-tier system with multiple small unitary councils.”

A two-tier system means responsibilities are split between a county council and district councils.

Councils involved in the reorganisation have been submitting plans to create new local authorities in their areas.

Some have proposed setting up multiple smaller unitary authorities in their areas.
In Essex, for example, the county council has proposed three new unitary authorities in the region.

The government will decide which proposals to take forward and intends to inform most councils next year.

A government spokesperson insisted the reorganisation “will improve services and save taxpayers’ money”.

Financial shocks

Ministers talked up the potential to save money as one of the main benefits of local government reorganisation.

Speaking to MPs in June, Rayner said: “Local government reorganisation will lead to better outcomes for residents and save a significant amount of money that can be reinvested in public services and improve accountability.”

But her department insisted it was not necessary to commission separate in-house analysis of the cost of reorganisation at the public’s expense, in response to the BBC’s freedom of information request.

The government’s savings estimates were based on data produced by PwC, an accounting firm, and analysis by the CCN, external, a cross-party lobbyist group.

A PwC report in 2020 estimated potential savings of £2.9bn over five years if all councils in two-tier areas were replaced by single authorities.

But in updated analysis this year, external, the CCN said the reorganisation could cost £850m over five years and deliver no savings if 58 new councils, based on a minimum population of 300,000, were created in all 21 two-tier areas.

“Under this scenario no long-term efficiency savings would be delivered, meaning it would be more efficient to retain the current two-tier system in England,” the CCN’s analysis said.

Oliver said the CCN’s analysis showed “that splitting county areas into unitary councils with populations as small as 300,000 will create hundreds of millions of new unsustainable costs for local taxpayers”.

The councillor said the government must ensure the new councils created are the right size to achieve efficiencies, improve capacity and withstand financial shocks.

“Failure to do so could pile further strain on already under pressure care services and at a time when many county and district authorities could see their funding reduced,” Oliver said.

‘Mega councils’

The District Councils’ Network (DCN) said the reorganisation could produce poor results given the funding pressures already facing local government.

“It’s astonishing that the government has undertaken no independent analysis before embarking on the biggest reorganisation of councils for 50 years,” said Sam Chapman-Allen, chair of the District Councils’ Network.

“Mega councils, with populations of half a million people or more, could be imposed on areas when there’s no independent, up-to-date evidence to justify councils of this size, and many large councils created previously are struggling financially.”

The DCN said it was not too late for the government to commission analysis on the optimal size of councils to maximise potential savings.

Liberal Democrat deputy leader Daisy Cooper said: “It beggars belief that the government has embarked on a huge reorganisation of vital services, in a way which piles even more costs onto councils, whose finances are already on the brink.”

Stephen Atkinson, Reform UK leader of Lancashire County Council, said: “It is extraordinary that Angela Rayner is pushing ahead with these huge changes to local government without either proper consultation or any independent analysis of how much it might actually cost.

“To make fundamental changes to 20 councils in one year is unprecedented and will lead to vulnerable children and adults falling between the gaps.”

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: “Councils across the country have also told us that bringing services together under one roof means residents get joined-up support when they need it most, while clearer structures mean people know exactly who’s responsible for delivering their services.

“Councils will also develop their own proposals for how reorganisation works best in their areas, as we fix the foundations of local government through our Plan for Change.”

England will sell off more than eight times as many council homes in 2025-26 as were constructed the previous year, research has found.

Rachel Hall www.theguardian.com

Right to buy is depleting council housing stock more quickly than public housing can be replaced, forcing people to spend more money on private market rents and obtain less secure tenancies, a report from the thinktank Common Wealth finds.

Its analysis of government data in England found that 38,170 social homes and 2,850 council homes were constructed by the government in 2023-24. In 2024-25, 2,260 council homes were built. There were 13,966 sell-offs of council houses through right to buy in 2023-24 and 8,656 in 2024-25. An analysis in the i Paper estimated that 18,500 council homes will be sold off in 2025-26 – more than eight times more than the number built in 2024-25.

The report concludes that if the government wants to increase the supply of social rental housing quickly, it must invest in buying back and restoring homes sold off under right to buy, alongside more council housebuilding.

Adam Peggs, the report’s author, said: “We need to pull every effective lever we can find to expand public housing. Council housing gave people secure, low-cost homes in the past. With the right framework, it can give people high-quality, genuinely affordable homes, with real democratic voice in the future too. But we need to build the political will to make it happen.

“Every day of delay is another day families languish in squalid temporary accommodation. The government has the tools to turn this emergency around – and more quickly than they might admit – they just need to use them.”

The report, which is published on Thursday, is also calling for expanded “right of first refusal” powers, enabling local authorities to be the preferred buyer when ex-social homes and private rental homes enter the market.

Since 1980, 2.4m council homes have been sold off under right to buy, at a discount that Common Wealth calculated was valued at £194bn, accounting for house price appreciation, with 41% now belonging to private landlords. As a result, council homes have collapsed from accommodating about 30% of households in the late 1970s to 6% today, a decline of about 80%.

Common Wealth’s report analysed council buy-ups of existing homes for public and social housing in seven countries, and determined that funding and incentivising a national right to buy back scheme would be a cost-effective policy in the UK.

The Spanish government has granted powers for a right of first refusal to the country’s new national public housing company after Barcelona acquired 1,500 homes – more than one-fifth of new affordable homes in the city – through right of first refusal powers since 2016, often below their market value.

The report also recommends a national rollout of a London scheme, in which the Greater London Authority bought 1,500 mostly ex-council homes in the first year of its right to buy back scheme. The New Economics Foundation calculated that this would generate a net saving to the taxpayer within 16 years.

A 2024 report from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation concluded that buyouts would offer better value for public money, rather than paying housing benefit to private landlords or private temporary accommodation.

Kwajo Tweneboa, a social housing campaigner and the author of Our Country in Crisis, said: “Homes that were once publicly owned are now profit-generating assets for private landlords. That’s the legacy of right to buy. Reversing that damage isn’t just a nice idea. It’s essential.

“Buying back ex-council homes and investing in a new generation of high-quality, genuinely affordable council homes must be the backbone of any serious plan to fix this crisis. That means central government stepping up with proper funding and power – not just warm words and weak targets.”

A Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government spokesperson said: “We do not recognise these figures. We know, however, that too many social homes have been sold off before they can be replaced, which has directly contributed to the worst housing crisis in living memory.

“That’s why we have introduced right-to-buy reforms to reverse the decline in much needed council housing, alongside investing £39bn to deliver the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation.”

“Though the inspector agreed the site “does not represent an appropriate location for the proposed housing”, the inspector noted that East Devon District Council did not have a five-year housing land supply.”

The Government has changed the goal posts by increasing our housing target – we were close to a 5 year supply but now we aren’t! See here. – Owl

Bradley Gerrard www.exmouthjournal.co.uk

The developer behind a plan for 42 homes in an East Devon village has been given the green light by a government inspector after the local council blocked one version but then accepted another.

A proposal to build 42 homes on land between Meeting Lane and Strawberry Hill in Lympstone was initially refused by East Devon District Council’s planning committee in August last year.

But then the developer, 3 West, put in a tweaked version of the scheme, including making it an ‘outline’ plan, meaning it was seeking permission to build ‘up to 42 homes’, with the exact figure to be agreed at a later date.

That revised version was rubber-stamped by East Devon’s planning committee in November, but this prompted the developer to appeal the decision to reject its initial scheme.

Now the Planning Inspectorate has allowed the appeal, meaning 42 homes can be built on the site.

The council’s approval of the subsequent outline scheme on the same site was deemed a “material consideration” by the inspector.

Furthermore, “moderate weight” was given to the fact that the site was included in the council’s emerging local plan, which has yet to be ratified but identifies areas where homes could be built. That inclusion came after the initial planning application was refused.

The main issues dealt with by the inspector included whether the site was appropriate for housing, the effect on the character and appearance of the area and the scheme’s potential impact on protected trees, and whether there was adequate social housing that was also properly dispersed across the site rather than clumped together.

Fears about the impact on the nearby Exe Estuary and Pebblebed Heaths European Protected Site was a final factor.

But even though the inspector agreed the site “does not represent an appropriate location for the proposed housing”, the inspector noted that East Devon District Council did not have a five-year housing land supply.

Meeting housing targets

This is a government requirement upon councils, meaning they have to have enough approved planning sites to show they can meet their annual housing target over the next five years.

While East Devon had a 4.5 year supply when it initially refused the application last year, changes to national planning policy since then mean it now only has nearly three years’ worth.

The inspector also agreed with the council that the affordable housing was not suitably dispersed throughout the site, but concentrated in one area.

The council had raised the fear that this could limit social cohesion, and the inspector said there appeared to be no reason why the affordable housing “could not be dispersed throughout the development without materially harming the character and appearance of the area”.

The developer has proposed 35 per cent of the properties would be affordable, and has pledged nearly £293,000 to help fund further affordable homes in other areas of the district. That step has been taken because developments in rural areas are required to have a 50 per cent level of affordable housing, although funding can be given in lieu of some on-site provision.

The inspector also felt there was suitable mitigation proposed by the developer to ensure that the Pebblebed Heaths would not be unduly impacted, and while some heritage concerns were noted – especially in regard to Thorne Farmhouse – they were not deemed significant. 

“Having considered the benefits and adverse impacts of the appeal scheme, I conclude that the adverse impacts identified, namely conflict with the council’s spatial strategy, limited harm in respect of the proposed affordable housing provision and less than substantial harm to the heritage significance of the listed building at Thorne Farmhouse would not, cumulatively, significantly and demonstrably outweigh the substantial benefits of the proposal when assessed against the policies of the framework taken as a whole,” the inspector stated.

“Therefore, the presumption in favour of sustainable development, as set out in the framework, applies.”

The developer also submitted a claim for costs against the council, but the inspector refused this.

A new water monitoring project to help tackle pollution has been launched by a Devon council.

Zhara Simpson BBC News, South West www.bbc.co.uk

South Hams District Council said it was “ramping up efforts to tackle water pollution” so that communities, experts and agencies could better understand what was happening in the area’s rivers and estuaries.

The council said the kit – from local marine tech firm Teledyne Valeport – enables the public to see real-time data on water quality in key areas across the district for the “very first time”.

It said the data would be shared publicly via an online dashboard in late 2025.

‘Tackle real problems’

The council said it teamed up with like-minded local groups which had been pushing for better river health.

It said from the Yealm to the Avon, Dart, Erme and Salcombe-Kingsbridge Estuary, community-led river and estuary groups had helped shape the project, including advising on the best locations in which to put the sensors.

Executive member for climate change and biodiversity John McKay said it was a brilliant example of collaboration between communities, researchers and businesses to help “tackle real problems”.

He added: “Local groups have been key to shaping this project and now we are giving them, and everyone else, access to real-time water quality data so we can all play a part in protecting our rivers and coastline.”

‘Real-time insights’

The project has been funded by the government and is being delivered in partnership with Innovative UK, the University of Plymouth and Teledyne Valeport, the council said.

The Environment Agency and local harbourmasters have also supported the project.

Innovation and project manager at Teledyne Valeport Amy Thompson said its sensors were able to provide the kind of real-time insights into water quality that it hopes will tackle water pollution.

She said: “This project is utilising our latest sensors, all designed and manufactured at our Totnes facility.

“It’s incredibly rewarding to see our instruments that are used worldwide being applied to such an important local initiative.”

Ditto Plymouth and Torbay (if given the chance).

Currently none of these three meet the original population targets set by Angela Rayner of 500,000 for the creation of new unitary authorities to create a single tier of authorities as she abolishes district councils.

Plymouth has only half the target population, Torbay has only a quarter, Exeter even less, so land grabs are in the air.

In fact, if Torbay is allowed to continue to be a unitary, then East Devon, with a similar population, has an equal right to be one as well, particularly were it to swallow Exeter in a reverse takeover to what is being proposed in the press article below.

This is naked self interest on the part of city dwellers and Owl is surprised to see it being led by a Labour controlled council.

Put crudely, those living in compact urban areas don’t want to contribute to providing services for the more costly and dispersed rural ones.

For example this is the line being peddled in Torbay: “People in Torbay have been warned they face steep rises in council tax if a local government shake-up sees them having to  join forces with their neighbours.

The bay has the lowest rate of council tax in Devon, but if Torbay is joined to neighbouring councils such as South Hams and Teignbridge in the forthcoming revamp of local councils, bay bills will inevitably rise.“

The map below shows vividly how Exeter City’s carve-up between the “haves” and the horseshoe of “have nots” would look.

Predictably, there has already been a very sharp backlash to Exeter’s “land grab” from Teignbridge councillors.

Angela Rayner’s aim is to get rid of district councils and create a set single tier councils. Overarching these “principal authorities (PA)” would be a “mayoral strategic authority (MSA)” who would get significant funds devolved from Whitehall.

All the districts have signed up to the 1-5-4 option. The “1” is Plymouth and the “5” and “4” refer to an east west split of the nine districts, including Exeter City and Torbay

Although geographical, or ceremonial, Devon could be a single PA it would be unwieldy both in area and population.

There are other options, the obvious, and simplest, is to divide the county into two with one of the two cities of Plymouth and Exeter in either half. Vainglory from the city leaders seems to trumping common sense.

Remember also that Angela Rayner’s proposal dramatically reduces your democratic representation in local affairs. The working assumption is that district wards will be abolished and your representation, however these PAs are created, will be based on existing county divisions.

Currently, we in East Devon are represented by 60 district councillors in 30 wards plus 11 county councillors in 9 divisions. After the abolition of districts our representation at local level will drop from 71 councillors to just 11. Their case load will become overwhelming.

Another Rayner rule is that a strategic mayor must control more than one PA.

Recently, all the Devon authorities signed up to a “South West Peninsular Mayoral Strategic Authority (MSA)”, obviously leaving open the door for Cornwall to join at some future date.

Already Angus Forbes wealthy “businessman, entrepreneur and philanthropist” from Australia, who came to Plymouth in 2019, is on manoeuvres. 

He garnered sufficient signatures to require Plymouth City Council to hold a referendum on having its own mayor. He had the backing of Reform but narrowly lost after the government intervened to kick the operational date until after the reorganisation, rendering the referendum pointless.

He is now rooting for the mayoral office to be in Plymouth.

County councillor Alan Connett, LibDem Exminster, sums it all up when he says:

“Changing the way councils are organised and run in Devon is a cash-wasting priority for the Government that is being rushed through.”

With land grabs being submitted by both Plymouth and Exeter, and Cornwall insisting on staying as it is, a county wide unitary, unpopular decisions will have to be made by government or the timetable will have to slip. As planned, this deeply unpopular reorganisation will begin to be implemented in the run up to the next election, well before any benefits appear. Owl expects things to slip.

All authorities are all holding consultations on reorganisation with different timescales and it is difficult to see how one’s voice can be heard in all the noise.

Exeter plans to lead a brave new Devon

The city would absorb 49 towns and villages in the process

Guy Henderson www.devonlive.com

Exeter has been urged to ‘be brave’ and go ahead with bold plans to go it alone in the massive nationwide local government shake-up.

Members of the city council were almost unanimous – just one councillor abstained – in backing a proposal for Exeter to become a stand-alone unitary council, absorbing 49 other Devon communities in the process.

Councillors heard that the 49 – comprising 28 in East Devon, 15 in Teignbridge and six in Mid Devon – are parishes that naturally look to Exeter for work and leisure.

“I believe that Exeter has a responsibility to lead,” said city council leader Phil Bialyk (Lab, Exwick). “Not to demand, not to dictate, but to lead with clarity, humility and deep respect for the communities around us.

“We need to find the best possible option for all of Devon.”

The city council’s strategy would boost its population to more than 250,000, fitting the government’s criteria for one of its new unitary authorities, but other councils around Devon continue to come up with other plans.

The existing district authorities all favour a ‘1-5-4’ model in which Plymouth stands alone and the rest split to create two larger councils.

Under that option, the five-council section would include Exeter, East Devon, Mid Devon, Torridge and North Devon. The four-council section would be Torbay, Teignbridge, South Hams and West Devon.

But Torbay has said it wants to go it alone, and one Torbay councillor described Exeter’s recent decision to pursue a unitary future as ‘a huge rock thrown into the pool’.

If Exeter’s proposal for it and Plymouth to be two unitary councils with the rest of Devon forming another, Torbay would be part of a giant coast-to-coast council stretching from the southernmost tip of the South Hams to the most northerly part of North Devon, and taking in the Somerset, Dorset and Cornwall boundaries.

A report to the city council said Exeter’s strategy reflects its position as a major urban hub with strengths in housing growth, knowledge economy, innovation, education, climate science and transport connectivity.

Cllr Michael Mitchell (Lib Dem, Duryard and St James) said: “This is the start of a journey, but the destination is still unclear.”

He also echoed calls for strong town and parish councils under the new unitaries to make sure local issues were at the top of the agenda.

Cllr Laura Wright (Lab, St Thomas) went on: “This isn’t about Exeter swallowing up the surrounding areas. These are areas which already have a strong local connection. It makes so much sense.”

Cllr Ruth Williams (Lab, Mincinglake and Whipton) said some of the other options favoured by other councils were a ‘back of a fag packet effort’. “How can they think that clumping five districts and four districts together is going to work for those residents?

“No thought seems to have been put into it at all.

And Cllr Josie Parkhouse (Lab, Pennsylvania) told the meeting: “This is our chance to lead. Let’s seize it.”

A period of six weeks of intense public engagement starts now. All councils have been asked to consider their options before a deadline of November 28, when their preference must be submitted to the government. Ministers will then make a final decision, and the new councils will take control in May 2028.

Elections to the new councils will be held in May 2027, with councillors acting in a ‘shadow’ role leading up to the final switch a year later.

An anxious Budleigh Salterton resident, following the Exmouth ban on seawater bathing, asks if any tests have been carried out by the Environment Agency on the stagnant Kersbrook at the side of the skateboard park.

This now has minimal current or flow.  The sewer emergency outfall from the sewage works can be clearly seen. As a consequence there is often an unpleasant smell. It is tragic to see the dying trees on the bank and the scum on the surface of the water. 

The kingfisher has not been seen for a long while.

This water is connected to the sea 100m away through a conduit under the road. Its end is visible at low tide.

Yards east of the beach outfall into the bay the Lifeguards have a recommended area for safe water bathing.

How many would do so if they just walked a few metres and looked over the bridge?

Would an EA test produce a similar result to Exmouth?

A red flag is blowing in the wind on a beach. Beachgoers are in the distance. Swimmers are in the water. The sky is blue.

This is at the height of the holiday season and it’s not raining! – Owl

It comes after the Environment Agency detected elevated readings of ammonia in a brook linked to the beach

Swimmers have been told to stay out of the water at a Devon beach after a pollution incident.

Chloe Parkman www.bbc.co.uk

The Environment Agency is investigating after it detected “elevated readings of ammonia” in a brook that connects to the bathing water at Exmouth beach.

South West Water (SWW) said it had not had any storm overflow spills in the area.

Beachgoer Jamie Steadman said: “We spent money on all day parking, went to the beach for an hour and [were] then told we can’t swim in the water.”

Mr Steadman visited the beach at about 11:00 BST before lifeguards and the council started to display warning signs.

He said lifeguards would not reveal further details about the pollution after instructing swimmers to exit the water.

“The response was ‘we can’t tell you but there is pollution in the water’,” he added.

“They’re telling everyone to get out of the water… but there’s no explanation as to why, what or when.

“The whole of Exmouth beach is now cordoned off.”

‘Red flags’

East Devon District Council (EDDC) said a “pollution incident reporting tool” was issued as a precaution by the Environment Agency due to “elevated ammonia levels”.

The Environment Agency said: “South West Water are supporting this action by checking their assets, including for any potential misconnections to their sewerage network in the area.”

EDDC said council officers lowered the blue flag and lifeguards would fly the red flag to advise against swimming.

“No swimming signs will also be displayed,” it said.

“We hope we can remove these signs and the red flags as soon as possible.”

SWW said: “The Environment Agency have assured us that they are thoroughly investigating and we will continue to support in any way we can.”

Exmouth resident Louise Hughes said it was “disappointing”.

“We came today to the beach because it was so hot, we really wanted to go swimming,” she said.

Alex Harding said water pollution had never been a problem for him when travelling abroad.

“Why is this just a British problem?” he asked.

He added: “Why can’t we get our act together and just make it so that, consistently, you can come to a beach? It’s not much to ask, is it?

“Coming to a beach and to go in the sea, it’s not rocket science.

“But all too often it’s just ‘no, you can’t go in because of this, because of that’, excuses, excuses.”

The crime commissioner has asked for James Vaughan to stay on longer

Commissioner Hernandez said the force and the residents of Devon, Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly would now benefit from a much-needed period of stability. [Haven’t we had the benefit of “stability” from Alison Hernandez as commissioner since 2016? – Owl]

Carl Eve www.devonlive.com

Devon and Cornwall Police’s interim Chief Constable is to keep the force’s top cop seat warm for 16 more months after his contract was extended by Police and Crime Commissioner Alison Hernandez.

Chief Constable Vaughan QPM has agreed to stay on in the post which was recently vacated following the sudden retirement of Chief Constable Will Kerr, who had been on suspension, on full pay, for the last two years. During a crime panel meeting in 2024, Ms Hernandez admitted Mr Kerr was on a salary of “about £170,000 a year”.

Mr Vaughan has agreed to stay on in the top job for another 16 months, after Ms Hernandez offered to extend his contract to January 2027. She had initially appointed him in December 2024 following the suspension of the then Acting Chief Constable Jim Colwell.

Devon and Cornwall Police was last week removed from the Engage stage of monitoring – also known as special measures – by His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services.

Commissioner Hernandez said the force and the residents of Devon, Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly would now benefit from a much-needed period of stability, and she was looking forward to seeing further improvements under Mr Vaughan’s leadership.

She said: “I have been really pleased to see how Chief Constable Vaughan has tackled head-on several legacy issues from the period of unstable leadership that preceded his appointment.

“In particular, I have welcomed his decision to reduce the number of senior ranks to enable more officers to be out in the community where council taxpayers can really feel the benefit and get better value for their money.

“It’s so important that Mr Vaughan and I take a unified approach in delivering my police and crime plan priorities. I have been delighted to work closely with him and stand side by side at events including my recent VAWG [Violence Against Women and Girls] Disruptive Ideas workshop that aims to tackle violence against women and girls, and councillor advocate seminar on the serious violence work taking place across the peninsula.

“I look forward to the coming 16 months which I am confident will see more good work and continued improvement under Mr Vaughan’s experienced leadership.”

Chief Constable James Vaughan said: “It is a personal privilege to be asked by the Commissioner to stay on in my role. I have really enjoyed leading this fantastic organisation for the last eight months and seeing the great work officers, staff and volunteers do every day to keep our communities safe.

“Despite some challenging times we have made considerable progress over the last few years and that is testament to the hard work of everyone in the Force. Working closely with the PCC and our partners I am confident that we will continue to improve the service we offer across Devon, Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly.”

Mr Colwell was returned to his substantive role as Deputy Chief Constable and has resumed his duties after he was given a written warning for breaching professional standards.

The breach was eventually revealed to have been “a failure to report exchanging personal messages with a journalist on social media”, which went against the force’s misconduct and notifiable associations policy.

The process to recruit a substantive Chief Constable is due to begin in the summer of 2026.

Exeter unveils: The Greater Exeter Strategic Plan (GESP) on steroids!

Owl has been watching as all the Districts, Devon County, and the two unitaries, Torbay and Plymouth, row in behind what is, at the moment, an hypothetical “South West Peninsular Mayoral Strategic Authority” (MSA) in letters to the Secretary of State. [Possibly behind clenched teeth]

Torbay appears ready to join in as districts are forced to amalgamate into unitaries of sufficient size.

Plymouth has ambition to expand in order to meet the minimum size criteria set by Angela Rayner or face amalgamation.

Exeter has now dropped a bombshell.

The city looks to be seeking, unilaterally, a massive takeover of its neighbours, mostly from East Devon and Teignbridge, GESP on steroids!

Exeter could absorb 39 towns and villages in mammoth expansion

A key decision looms Guy Henderson www.devonlive.com

Exeter City council leader Phil Bialyk at Exeter bus station (Image: Exeter City Council)

[Looks ready to swoop! – Owl]

City councillors in Exeter will vote next week on a move to spread the city’s wings and swallow up nearly 40 smaller communities across Devon.

The city council believes it will help boost its population to more than 250,000, fitting the government’s criteria for one of its new unitary authorities.

Local councils across the country will face major changes as part of the government’s move to ‘streamline’ the way local authorities work. In Devon it will mean the abolition of district councils and the creation of larger unitaries covering the county.

The existing districts all favour a ‘1-5-4’ model in which Plymouth stands alone and the rest of the districts split to create two larger councils.

The five-council section would include Exeter, East Devon, Mid Devon, Torridge and North Devon.

The four-council section would be Torbay, Teignbridge, South Hams and West Devon.

But Torbay has said it wants to go it alone, and now Exeter City Council has published its own proposal.

It says it reflects the city’s position as a major urban hub with strengths in housing growth, knowledge economy, innovation, education, climate science and transport connectivity.

It says it recognises the importance of Devon’s two major urban centres – Exeter and Plymouth – as engines for economic and housing growth for the benefit of the whole county.

It says the right way to go is an urban unitary council for Exeter and the surrounding areas; an urban unitary council for an expanded Plymouth and a rural and coastal unitary council for the rest of Devon.

Council Leader Phil Bialyk (Lab, Exwick) said: “Reorganisation presents a once in a generation opportunity to reshape public services to improve outcomes for residents, address inequalities and deliver value for money.

“Exeter is the regional capital and acts as the engine for growth of our dynamic and diverse urban and rural area and our important market towns.

“By joining forces with key locations close to the city – places with a strong connection and affiliation with Exeter – we can create a new unitary council which accelerates growth and allows communities to thrive.”

The proposed new urban unitary council for Exeter and the surrounding area would serve a population of around 256,273, rising to 294,079 by 2040.

It would include 15 locations currently in the Teignbridge District Council area: Dawlish Town, Ashcombe, Mamhead, Starcross, Kenton, Chudleigh Town, Powderham, Exminster, Kenn, Dunchideock, Shillingford St George, Ide, Holcombe Burnell, Whitestone, Tedburn St Mary.

There would be 18 locations currently in the East Devon District Council area: Exmouth, Woodbury, Lympstone, Otterton, East Budleigh, Budleigh Salterton, Colaton Raleigh, Bicton, Upton Pyne, Brampford Speke, Stoke Cannon, Nether Exe, Rewe, Huxham, Poltimore, Broadclyst, Clyst Hydon, Clyst St Lawrence, Whimple, Cranbrook, Rockbeare, West Hill, Aylesbeare, Farringdon, Clyst Honiton, Sowton, Clyst St Mary, Clyst St George.

There would also be six locations currently in the current Mid Devon District Council area:

Cheriton Bishop, Hittisleigh, Colebrook, Crediton Town, Crediton Hamlets, Newton St Cyres.

Members will discuss the report on August 14.

New data show Anglian Water was the worst offender, followed by South West Water and the crisis-hit Thames Water.

Adam Vaughan www.thetimes.com 

England’s water companies are causing more than 100 potentially illegal raw sewage spills a day into rivers and seas, far more than previously thought, The Times can reveal.

New data, which suggests a previously unknown level of widespread breaches of the law, shows Anglian Water was the worst offender, followed by South West Water and the crisis-hit Thames Water.

The potentially illegal nature of many of the spills raises the prospect of a wave of prosecutions and potential multimillion-pound fines for water firms. Regulators said the figures were “unacceptable” and they would not hesitate to take enforcement action against breaches of permits.

Raw sewage is legally permitted to pour into waterways from relief outfalls, known as storm overflows, on days of heavy rainfall. Those legal spills, which lasted a record 3.61 million hours last year, have sparked public outrage and targets from ministers to halve them.

However, they are not meant to happen on dry days, when the risk to swimmers and wildlife is greater because the pollution is not diluted by rainwater.

Companies have previously cast doubt on independent attempts to gauge the extent of such “dry day spills”, which experts said were likely to mostly be in breach of permits and illegal, with a few exceptions.

The previous best estimate was about 6,000 dry day spills in a year. However, the data shared with the Times shows that number in just two months.

“The massively high numbers of untreated sewage spills on days when we haven’t had exceptional rainfall is the canary in the mine — clear evidence that our sewage infrastructure and capacity has not kept pace with population growth, development and climate change over the last decades,” said Michelle Walker, the technical director of the Rivers Trust, a charity.

The Times, which obtained the data using transparency laws, can disclose there were 6,177 dry day spills by nine water companies across January and February. Anglian Water reported 1,347 dry day spills, followed by South West Water on 1,306 and Thames Water on 1,063. Northumbrian had the lowest figure, with 210.

The figures have come to light because since January the Environment Agency (EA) has required water firms to report dry day spills. It now classifies them as pollution incidents.

Much of Britain’s sewer system is based on the model chosen in the 19th century, of combining rainwater and sewage in the same pipes. During heavy rainfall, storm overflows can by design be used to stop sewage backing up into homes and businesses.

However, dry spills should not happen. Observers said the high frequency of day spills uncovered by The Times suggested companies had failed to keep sewers clear and had not invested enough in infrastructure to keep pace with population growth.

A dry day is defined by the EA as having no rainfall above 0.25mm on the day and the 24 hours beforehand. “Storm overflows should not spill on dry days,” the regulator has said.

The new figures are important because they are sourced directly from the water firms. Some companies have contested past efforts by the BBC to infer how many dry spills there were by cross-referencing stop-start times of sewage spills with weather data, claiming the methodology was flawed.

The agency is in the process of establishing how many of the 6,000-plus discharges were illegal. The regulator has said dry day spills could lead to prosecutions, written warnings and financial penalties for companies.

Alex Ford, a professor of biology at the University of Portsmouth, said the EA was likely to find a high level of illegality. “Most, if they occurred during dry spells, are illegal. They would still be potentially illegal if they were caused by delayed rising water tables and seepage into cracked pipes,” he said.

Experts said dry day spills were typically more devastating for people and the environment than those during exceptional rainfall.

“Definitely, dry weather spills are worse because of the lack of dilution in the river — so any pollutants or infectious pathogens will be more concentrated if someone were to swallow some of the water,” said Barbara Evans, a professor of public health engineering at the University of Leeds.

“In dry weather people may be using the rivers and beaches more, so there are more people who may then be exposed to the pollutants,” she added.

Most of the dry day spills are understood to be classed by the EA as category three pollution incidents, where one is the most severe and four the least. The reasons why dry day spills can occur include under-investment in pipes and treatment plants, blockages in sewers and groundwater infiltrating into pipes via cracks and other routes.

Some of the spills this year could have happened without permits being breached. For example, in a large catchment water may fall in one place and take more than a day to drain down to another area where the spill occurs.

However, campaigners said the scale was unacceptable. Giles Bristow, the chief executive of the charity Surfers Against Sewage, which uncovered early evidence of dry spills in 2022, said of the 6,177 spills: “It’s outrageous, unlawful, and a damning indictment of a water industry broken beyond repair.”

The group’s provisional data shows a total of 206,529 raw sewage spills during January and February, most of which will have been legally permitted. “It’s bad enough having to think twice on taking a dip after rain — to do so in dry weather is just downright ludicrous,” said Bristow.

An EA spokeswoman said: “The number of pollution spills happening in dry weather is unacceptable. We investigate every dry spill and our message to the industry is clear: we will not hesitate to take robust enforcement action where we identify serious breaches.”

A spokeswoman for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said: “Our root and branch reform will revolutionise the water industry through a record £104 billion investment.”

All of the companies were contacted, and none disputed the figures. Anglian Water said it is spending around £1 billion on storm overflows up to 2030. “We recognise that customers want us to take swift action to end storm overflow discharges. We intend to meet these expectations,” a spokesman said.

A South West Water spokeswoman said: “We are clear that storm overflows must only be used when absolutely necessary.” The firm note said it was trying to eliminate dry day spills caused by groundwater infiltration.

A spokesman for Water UK, the industry body, said: “No spill is ever acceptable. Water companies are working to end them as fast as possible by tripling investment. Over the next five years, companies will invest £12 billion to halve spills from storm overflows by 2030 including relining and sealing sewers to prevent groundwater infiltration — one of the main causes of dry day spills.”

Richard Foord, MP for Honiton and Sidmouth, has called on the chief executive of NHS Devon to allocate one of the five community hospitals in his constituency for this purpose.

Bobby Angelov www.midweekherald.co.uk

An MP is urging for a hospital to be turned into a neighbourhood health centre in East Devon.

In a letter to Steve Moore, Mr Foord highlighted the potential for investment in local health services, given the “rapidly expanding older population.”

He expressed concern about the comfort of residents, particularly in Sidmouth and Seaton, with NHS England’s increasing reliance on technology and artificial intelligence.

Citing the 2021 census, Mr Foord noted that around one quarter of Seaton and Sidmouth residents have some form of disability.

In both areas, around 10 per cent of the population provide unpaid care for a friend or relative.

He also pointed out that the average age in these towns has increased more than the England and South West averages.

Mr Foord said: “This means that there are five hospitals in my constituency that have the potential for essential investment in local health services amid what is a rapidly expanding older population, that will continue in the years to come.

“The Sidmouth and Seaton areas in particular, are now well known to be home to demographic mainly over the age of 65, who are not necessarily comfortable with NHS England’s direction of travel with AI and technology.”

The community hospitals in question are Honiton, Sidmouth, Axminster, and Seaton, all of which have some available space, while Ottery St Mary Hospital is currently at full capacity.

Mr Foord praised the state of repair of Ottery St Mary, Seaton, and Honiton hospitals, noting they are only about 30 years old.

Axminster Hospital, though older, is reportedly in good condition.

Mr Foord has previously raised this issue with the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and followed up with another letter and question in parliament.

Wrong sort of drought – not long since we had rain causing landslips and disruption in the same area! – Owl

Rail services in parts of southern England are being reduced because embankments have shrunk and disturbed the track after the sunniest spring in more than a century.

Gwyn Topham www.theguardian.com

Trains are unable to travel at full speed over embankments in Dorset and Devon that have contracted because of a lack of moisture in the soil.

In the latest example of extreme weather affecting the UK’s railways, South Western Railway (SWR) said that for a safe and reliable service it had no alternative but to reduce the number of trains running.

Journeys from London Waterloo to Exeter will take an hour longer, with trains running at 40mph instead of 85mph for sections of the route.

This year’s was the second driest spring on record for England, with the least amount of rainfall since 1976. The lack of moisture has caused embankments to shrink on a 12-mile stretch of track between Gillingham in Dorset and Axminster in Devon.

The speed restrictions on the single-track route means trains cannot pass at the usual times and places, and SWR said it had been forced to cut services from the schedule.

The operator said dry conditions were likely to continue and that further speed restrictions could be needed.

SWR’s chief operating officer, Stuart Meek, said: “We are very sorry for the disruption that customers will experience due to this change, as we know just how important the west of England line is to the communities it serves.

“We have not taken this decision lightly … However, to continue operating a safe and reliable service, we have no alternative but to introduce a reduced timetable.”

Network Rail’s operations director, Tom Desmond, said: “The safety of our customers is our number one priority, which is why we must impose these speed restrictions. We will regularly review conditions in order to restore the normal timetable as soon as possible.”

The changing climate has caused problems for the railway in recent years, including the need to impose speed restrictions in extreme summer heat for fear of buckling rails.

Train services were meanwhile cut back in Kent last year after the wettest winters on record also affected tracks and embankments.

Network Rail is spending almost £3bn over the period 2024-29 to tackle the effects of climate change, having already increased its budget to maintain earthworks in the wake of the Stonehaven disaster, when heavy rain and poor drainage led to a landslip.

Exeter Airport has been sold [again – Owl] alongside two other English regional airports in a £200m deal.

Jonathan Morris www.bbc.co.uk

Investment firm ICG confirmed it had agreed a deal with Rigby Group to purchase the Devon airport, along with airports in Bournemouth and Norwich.

ICG said the airport’s passenger and cargo operations would be expanded and Steven Wiltshire, the airport’s managing director, called the deal “great news for Exeter and great news for Devon”.

Exeter Airport opened in 1937 and has flights to a number of UK and international destinations, including Edinburgh, Amsterdam and Lanzarote.

‘Time for growth’

Mr Wiltshire said Exeter could handle up to 1.2m passengers annually, about 400,000 more than current levels, before requiring major infrastructure upgrades.

“Flights are pretty full, there’s some capacity on the routes we’re operating currently, but additional aircraft and new routes would help us reach that next level,” Mr Wiltshire said.

The airport currently serves 27 destinations including recently launched daily flights to Amsterdam with KLM which began in March.

Addressing staffing concerns at the airport, which directly employs 230 people, he said: “We’re not anticipating any change from the leadership team or on the ground at all, so it’s business as usual as far as the staff and our customers are concerned.”

The deal, set to close later this month, will see ICG support airport operator’s Regional & City Airports (RCA) “expansion across its airport, cargo, and executive aviation operations”, said ICG.

“Now is the right time for the next phase in RCA’s growth,” said Steve Rigby, co-CEO of Rigby Group.

Airlines which operate from Exeter Airport include Ryanair, KLM, Aer Lingus and TUI.

The site was used by fighter planes during World War Two, including the Polish Air Force’s 307 Squadron in 1942.

The airport has grown in size, with a new arrivals building being opened by the Princess Royal in June 1999 before a £950,000 departure lounge opened four years later.

In January 2007, Devon County Council sold the airport to Regional and City Airports – a specialist airport investment and development group run by Balfour Beatty – in a deal worth £60m.

In June 2013, Balfour Beatty sold the airport to Rigby Group for an undisclosed sum.

A spokesperson from the OVA says: Unfortunately, SWW have informed us that they do not plan further changes to their 5 sewage treatment plants that affect the River Otter until 2035 at the earliest.  

On the left is a section of the Otter River near its source with clean sparkling gravel. On the right is a picture of the lower Otter (see below) with a thick layer of slimy algae covering, what should be, clean sparkling gravel. Gravel that should be teeming with insect life – not smothered./

River Otter Water Body Poor ecological status (Source Environment Agency)

The spokesperson continues: Peter Williams, OVA lead analyst, summarises the quality issues: “ The data shows the Otter has the highest phosphate levels of any major river in Devon and Cornwall, and goes some way to explaining why it’s the only river system in the area classified as ‘poor’ by the Environment Agency. High levels of phosphate cause slimy algal blooms on the riverbed and decreased oxygen levels, leading to severe consequences for plant life, wildlife and fish populations ”. 

As a result of this, we have decided to run a publicity campaign that highlights the ailing river and to ask local communities to support this – as a way to bring pressure to bear on South West Water (first) and then the agricultural community (second).

See also: will Labour’s demands to “build at all costs” and south west water’s failure to invest kill the River Otter?

 Community action gathers momentum to #ReviveTheRiverOtter

Press Release Otter Valley Association with endorsements from:

• Richard Foord, MP for Honiton
• Councillor Jess Bailey, Devon County Council (Otter Valley)
• Sam Bridgewater, Director of Environment Strategy and Evidence, Clinton Devon Estates
• Howard Furnival, of Tracey Farm
• Martin Davies, Secretary of the Ottery Fly Fishing Club
• Bruce McGlasham, Secretary of the River Otter Fisheries Association
• Councillor Ian Simpson, Otterton Parish Council
• Councillor Dean Stewart, Chair of the Community Infrastructure Committee of Ottery St Mary Town Council
• Councillor Susan P Tribble, Chairman Newton Poppleford & Harpford Parish Council
• Budleigh Salterton Town Council
• Iorwerth (Yog) Watkins, Westcountry Rivers Trust
• Geoff Jung, East Devon District Council

Notable by their absence from this list are South West Water! – Owl

The OVA Action group ORCA (Otter River Catchment Action) is mobilizing local volunteers, anglers, civic organizations, and environmental advocates from Budleigh Salterton, Otterton, Newton Poppleford, Harpford and Ottery St. Mary to combat two major sources of pollution: Sewage-related pollution, including discharges of untreated sewage and high levels of phosphate in treated effluent from sewage works, by South West Water (SWW), and unsustainable land management.

Haylor Lass, Chairman of the Otter Valley Association, is calling on the local community to sign-up and help: “We’re a passionate civic charity and are now calling on local communities, farmers, anglers, businesses, and like-minded organisations to join forces with us to encourage SWW to take the action it needs to prevent their incessant pollution on the middle to lower reaches of the River Otter – namely to stop untreated sewage discharges and also to reduce phosphate levels in their continuous treated discharges”.

A team of 48 dedicated volunteers signed up and have been monitoring the river’s health every two weeks at 12 strategic locations stretching from Honiton to the sea. Sadly, in July 2025, the Phosphate levels are averaging 4x the upper safe level for a thriving ecosystem, and peak at 6x this limit just below the main sewage treatment works. These values have been steadily increasing as the water level drops, predominantly caused by high concentrations of phosphate in treated effluent discharged by sewage treatment works. High levels of phosphate cause algal blooms, eutrophication, and decreased oxygen levels in the water, leading to severe consequences for plant life, wildlife and fish populations.

Further plans are in place for River-fly (or invertebrate) testing to determine the state of life within the river and its tributaries, as well as working to reduce invasive species that are prevalent along long stretches of the river.

Local councillors, anglers, farmers, associations and businesses are behind this campaign, including:

•                    Richard Foord, MP for Honiton says “Momentum is already building to #ReviveTheRiverOtter; people-power can convince water companies to do the right thing by way of investing in our sewage treatment works here. I look forward to seeing those photos of the River Otter”.

•                    Councillor Jess Bailey, Devon County Council (Otter Valley) says “have long campaigned against South West Water treating our beautiful River Otter as an open sewer. As part of this I have been pleased to help fund water testing with my DCC locality budget. The River Otter is special not only locally but nationally. It is the first river in the country to have seen the re-introduction of beavers into the wild, beavers having previously been hunted to extinction. Improving water quality is crucially important for the survival and wellbeing of the beavers and other cherished wildlife. I am excited to be part of the Revive the River Otter campaign. This is exactly what is needed, galvanising pressure on SWW and helping restore the River Otter to its former glory.

•                    Sam Bridgewater, Director of Environment Strategy and Evidence, Clinton Devon Estates says: “This is a brilliant initiative. Community-led and bringing together a broad alliance of the willing, it addresses an issue of great concern for wildlife and for society. Clinton Devon Estates is delighted to be involved.”

•                    Howard Furnival, of Tracey Farm, says “We would be keen to be involved with this project with the OVA and their campaign ORCA. As a family who have lived for 7 generations, we are saddened to see how the river has been abused and mistreated. We hope this project will be the catalyst for change”.

•                    Martin Davies, Secretary of the Ottery Fly Fishing Club says “Anglers spend a lot of time on rivers and develop a close affinity with them and all the wildlife there. To witness, first-hand, the river Otter being degraded so badly is both shocking and depressing”

•                    Bruce McGlasham, Secretary of the River Otter Fisheries Association says “We are delighted to be working with OVA and the ORCA campaign to improve the quality of the river Otter. This will benefit not only local habitats and the natural environment for all, but also fish and all the other life that lives within or by the river””

•                    Councillor Ian Simpson, Otterton Parish Council, says “ Having grown up in the local area and lived in Otterton for 25 years, local residents and I find it extremely saddening to see the present state of the river Otter. As a child I fished and swam in this river and as an adult some 20 years ago me and my family along with many locals swam and used the river for recreation. The decline has been dramatic and devastating. Dogs that paddle in the river, including my own have become ill with vomiting and stomach issues. People swimming have become ill to the point that we warn people how polluted it is. Fish stocks have dwindled, and some species almost disappeared. I welcome the efforts of the OVA, and its ORCA campaign, to hopefully change the downward path of this once beautiful river and I feel that those polluting it should hang their heads in shame.”

•                    Councillor Dean Stewart, Chair of the Community Infrastructure Committee of Ottery St Mary Town Council, says “Ottery St Mary Town Council have been concerned for many years about the condition of the River Otter and other local waterways and beaches. We have questioned SWW in detail and both financially and politically supported local community groups such as the Tale Valley Trust and Tipton Eager Beavers. We very much welcome the formation of the ORCA campaign by the Otter Valley Association, and we hope we will be able to meet with them, support them and amplify their campaign for lasting and significant change.”

•                    Councillor Susan P Tribble, Chairman Newton Poppleford & Harpford Parish Council, says Newton Poppleford and Harpford Parish Council are concerned that poor water quality in the River Otter is impacting parishioners in multiple ways. These include reduced access to the river, diminished recreational and amenity value, and broader concerns over public health and environmental quality.

•                    Budleigh Salterton Town Council says that “it remains deeply concerned about the continued decline in the quality of water in the locality. The Council has been working closely with the Environment Agency, East Devon District Council, South West Water, and the Otter Valley Association (OVA) in an effort to address this issue. As a result of these collaborative efforts, the Environment Agency has confirmed that it will double its water testing along Budleigh Salterton’s Blue Flag-awarded beach throughout 2025. Budleigh Salterton is the only town situated within the East Devon National Landscape, and it forms part of the Jurassic Coast, a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The town’s natural environment – including its coastline, the River Otter and its resident beaver population, and the award-winning Lower Otter Estuary – is a significant attraction for visitors and a vital part of the local economy. Maintaining the ecological health of these areas is therefore of paramount importance. Regular water testing, carried out both by the ORCA arm of the OVA and by the Environment Agency, plays a crucial role in providing transparent and independent data. This evidence is essential in maintaining pressure on South West Water to review and revise its current practices, and to prioritise the restoration of the River Otter’s water quality. Budleigh Salterton Town Council will continue to advocate for the protection and enhancement of the town’s unique natural assets on behalf of its residents and future generations”.

•                    Iorwerth (Yog) Watkins, Westcountry Rivers Trust, says “I’ve been working on the Otter for many years and have seen significant improvements in farm management on many farms, but there is still more that needs to be done. SWW have contributed to my work though the Upstream Thinking project (UST), helping farmers use their nutrients more efficiently and avoid losses to both the River Otter and the aquifer. Unnoticed by many, there is also the contribution from private septic tanks that haven’t been maintained properly.”

•                    Geoff Jung, East Devon District Council, says “The river water quality of the River Otter is in a shameful decline. We all need to work together from residents, farmers, landowners, fertiliser and chemical companies, highways and sewage infrastructure providers, councils, government bodies and volunteers to all combine our knowledge, and best practices to return this river to its rightful place as an amazing river teeming with wildlife. This is a wonderful positive step in the right direction!

How to Get Involved

The OVA invites everyone to join in. Whether through volunteering, sharing resources, or amplifying the message, there’s a role for all who care about clean water, thriving wildlife, and resilient communities. To join the campaign or simply understand what if going on, please join the ORCA Facebook group at: https://www.facebook.com/groups/otterrivercatchmentaction/ and share your experiences. Please also use the hashtag #ReviveTheRiverOtter when sharing on social media.

For press inquiries, interview requests, or to learn how to participate, please contact the Otter Valley Association, or the ORCA campaign team via:

•                    Email: ORCA@ova.org.uk

•                    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/otterrivercatchmentaction/

•                    Web: https://www.ova.org.uk/nat-environ/otter-river-catchment-action-orca

Press Release 30th July 2025 Otter Valley Association

An “aspirational” plan for 500 social housing properties to be built or bought has been unveiled by a Devon council.

Bradley Gerrard, Local Democracy Reporter www.devonairradio.com 

The bold plan – that could cost around £100 million – has been unveiled by East Devon District Council as part of its bid to create more affordable housing in the district.

Members of the council’s housing review board (Thursday 31 July) were told about the plan, and how it might be funded if it were to be pursued.

No decision on whether to progress was made at the meeting, but it was endorsed by the housing review board to be progressed to cabinet and full council.

“The report does contain some big numbers, but we are not seeking budget approval today,” said Liam Reading, assistant director for investment and development.

“Rather today is about setting out what is possible in headline terms and explaining the viability.

“It is an aspirational target and we are setting the bar very high, but it is important to be ambitious.”

East Devon has more than 4,100 social housing properties at present, meaning that if stock levels remained the same and 500 more were built or bought, it would be above 4,600.

That compares to around 3,000 in neighbouring Mid Devon.

Mr Reading expected around £60 million of the predicted £100 million would need to be borrowed, with hopes for the remainder coming from the likes of government grants from Homes England.

In spite of the potential additional borrowing, though, Mr Reading asserted that the increase in its housing stock would not negatively impact its housing finances.

The aim would be for the rent from the new properties to cover the payments on the borrowing it had used to build or buy them.

Councillor Dan Ledger (Independent, Seaton), the cabinet member for sustainable homes and communities, said the build and buy plan was part of “looking to the future”.
“If you look at every single plan for the council, it all points to building and buying social homes for our tenants that are secure, comfortable and easy to heat, and this ticks to many boxes,” he said.

“It is a long time coming, but it is great to see.” Councillor Chris Burhop (Independent, Newton Poppleford and Harpford) said he had previously “ranted and raved about where the ambition was”.

“Well, here it is,” he said.

“Congratulations to the team on such an ambitious plan, something which we have heard for so many years we can’t do, but actually now we are showing a way forward where we can achieve things, and it will be fantastic for the community of East Devon if we can see this commenced and underway.”

Cllr Burhop added that he was actually concerned the finances being proposed could be “too small” given he had built a house and costs always exceeded expectations.

But Catrin Stark, director of housing and health, said the potential for higher levels of external funding and the economies of scale the council could achieve, were factors that could alter the cost per property to the council.

“I’m conscious, too, that we have got Cranbrook and the second new town coming, but what are we doing in the communities we currently serve,” she said.

“There are some areas that, in terms of regeneration, haven’t been forgotten but are a little left behind and so this is an opportunity to look at places with the most need and to serve communities that already exist rather than always concentrating on the shiny new places.”

The board heard that the majority of any new homes built or bought would be available under social rent, and that the council was not planning on creating its own development company.

Any new properties would also sit outside of Right To Buy legislation for 10 years, meaning they cannot be purchased under that scheme’s discounts until they are a decade old.
 

A recent cliff fall in Budleigh Salterton sparked a safety warning from authorities

George Thorpe BBC News, Devon

Beachgoers have been warned to stay away from areas affected by cliff falls in Devon.

A number of falls have been reported along the east Devon coast in recent years, including an incident in Budleigh Salterton on 26 July which led to two people having to be rescued after they became stranded.

A “major cliff fall” was also reported in Seaton on 1 March and another landslip forced the closure of a footpath at Salcombe Hill near Sidmouth in November last year.

East Devon District Council, the coastguard and Clinton Devon Estates urged people to avoid affected areas.

East Devon’s coast is made up of soft rocks including sandstone and conglomerate, which authorities said made them particularly prone to erosion, especially following periods of heavy rain or dry weather.

Projects have been set up by the council to protect parts of the coastline, including a £1.4m scheme to reduce erosion and reduce the risk of cliff falls at Seaton Hole.

The council said work on the project was due to begin on 26 August and it would help protect 41 nearby homes, including a care home.

A joint statement from the council and Clinton Devon Estates, which owns some of the coast, said cliff falls were a “natural and unpredictable occurrence”.

They urged anyone visiting the coastline not explore recent cliff falls and to call 999 if they witnessed an incident.

“Following a cliff fall at Budleigh Salterton beach on Saturday, we want to remind residents and visitors to avoid the affected area and to follow all warning signs, safety barriers and instructions,” it said.

‘Move well away’

Martin Freeland, station officer at Exmouth Coastguard Station, said a general rule to follow was to work out how tall the cliff was and then stay the same distance away from the cliff edge.

“Everyone likes a day at the beach, but it’s just being mindful about where you set yourself up for the day,” he said.

“The temptation of course is to go up and have a look and get a bit closer when a fall has happened.

“But the advice would be to move well away and seek advice from 999.”

The river Otter is now so contaminated with sewage related pollutants, that it is classed in the bottom 20 per cent of rivers in England for water quality. 

“The data shows the Otter has the highest phosphate levels of any major river in Devon and Cornwall.”

Richard Foord MP pays “tribute to the remarkable work of volunteers” at the Otter Valley Association, noting that their water quality testing was “very impressive”.

Owl’s view is that all development in the Otter catchment (as has been the case with  the Axe) should stop until South West Water has solved the problem.

Claire Wright writes:

#ReviveTheRiverOtter: Local people urged to take action in new campaign to restore “sick” watercourse

by Claire Wright 21 Jul 2025

Richard Foord MP with a member of the #ReviveTheRiverOtter campaign(Image: Richard Foord)

A Devon MP has joined forces with a community activist group, in a powerful new campaign to restore the health of an ailing local river, currently rated ‘poor’ by the Environment Agency.

The middle and lower reaches of the River Otter are now so contaminated with **sewage related pollutants, that it is classed in the bottom 20 per cent of rivers in England for water quality.

Figures from local environmental groups suggest that the River Otter has the highest phosphate levels of any major watercourse in Devon and Cornwall.

70 per cent of phosphate levels in the Otter come from the sewage system

The Environment Agency considers that around 70 per cent of phosphate levels in the Otter come from the sewage system.

In 2024, South West Water discharged untreated sewage into the River Otter for over 15,000 hours, and there are high levels of phosphate in the treated discharge, pumped into the river 24 hours a day, every day, from their treatment works.

Local people are being urged to join the campaign

Local people are being urged to join the campaign, which is spearheaded by the Otter Valley Association (OVA), and aims to persuade South West Water to adequately invest in local sewage infrastructure, to allow the river to flourish once again.

The campaign is strongly backed by Richard Foord, MP for Honiton & Sidmouth, who met with OVA representatives in May to observe water quality testing on the river. Mr Foord then called a meeting with South West Water, which took place last month and was attended by the OVA, representatives from the Environment Agency, and the River Otter Fisheries Association, whose members are also concerned about the river’s pollution levels.

South West Water has no plans to invest in local sewage infrastructure to stop the pollution in the river

South West Water representatives stated at the meeting that they have no plans to invest in the sewage infrastructure that discharges into the middle and lower sections of the Otter, for at least the next five years and most likely much longer.

The lifeblood of our landscape

Haylor Lass, Chairman of the Otter Valley Association, said: “This river is the lifeblood of our landscape, and it’s been neglected for far too long. We are standing together—locals, anglers, experts, and nature lovers—to give the Otter back its sparkle.”

Richard Foord, added: “The river Otter should be crystal clear and teeming with fish and invertebrates, but instead, the middle and lower sections are murky, slimy and sick. This is largely due to untreated or inadequately treated sewage being endlessly discharged in the river, by South West Water.

“We felt we had no option to but to launch #ReviveTheRiverOtter to stop SWWs appalling use of the River Otter as a free extension of their sewage infrastructure. This is just the start. We’ll keep going until we succeed in getting the investment the River Otter desperately needs to thrive once again.

“I want to pay tribute to the remarkable work of volunteers at the Otter Valley Association. Their data, expertise, clear objectives and mobilisation of the local community for water quality testing is very impressive. I was taken aback by their efforts when I met them, and I am backing them to the hilt in their endeavours.”

Forty eight volunteers test the Otter’s quality every two weeks

For the last four months, the Otter Valley Association has mobilised forty-eight dedicated volunteers who have been monitoring the river’s health at 12 strategic locations stretching from Honiton to the sea, measuring 10 different indicators of ecological health.

Water quality testing takes place every two weeks, forming one of the most comprehensive citizen science efforts in the region. In the latest round of testing, Phosphate levels were found to be over four times the ecological ‘upper safe limit’, peaking at six times just downstream of the major sewage works.

Peter Williams, OVA lead analyst, summarises the quality issues: “The data shows the Otter has the highest phosphate levels of any major river in Devon and Cornwall, and goes some way to explaining why it’s the only river system in the area classified as ‘poor’ by the Environment Agency. High levels of phosphate cause slimy algal blooms on the riverbed and decreased oxygen levels, leading to severe consequences for plant life, wildlife and fish populations.

“According to the Environment Agency, approximately 70 percent of the phosphate entering the Otter is a result of discharges from South West Water’s sewage infrastructure.”

#RevivetheRiverOtter is urging residents to take photos of the river

The first stage of #ReviveTheRiverOtter campaign asks residents to take photographs of their most and least favourite parts of the Otter over the summer and post them on their social media channels, using the hashtag #ReviveTheRiverOtter.

For impact, local people are asked to also tag Richard Foord on Facebook and Bluesky, the Otter Valley Association on Facebook and South West Water on Instagram, Facebook and X.

Stage two of the campaign will take place in the autumn

The OVA and Richard Foord have plans for stepping up the campaign in the autumn, if they do not see commitments from South West Water to invest in the local sewage treatment works that serves to prevent raw and inadequately treated sewage being discharged into the River Otter.

Sign up for updates on the Otter

Sign up for updates on the campaign to #ReviveTheRiverOtter

.

Council turns a poor legacy around. – Owl

East Devon District Council has been given a C2 rating for the quality of its council homes in its first assessment by a national watchdog.

Bradley Gerrard www.devonlive.com

East Devon District Council bagged a C2 rating, one rung down from the top C1 rating for consumer standards, in the first official scrutiny by the Regulator of Social Housing.

The regulator assesses four aspects including the quality of the council’s housing, tenant safety, and its transparency and accountability to residents.

East Devon was deemed to be performing well in terms of housing quality, health and safety compliance, tenant engagement and complaints handling and learning.

This result comes as the council has just concluded a survey of its social housing properties to fully understand the scale of repairs needed across the estate.

A total of 93 per cent of its more than 4,500 homes secured a pass rate in line with the Decent Homes Standard, compared to an average of 89 per cent for councils nationally, according to its stock condition survey.

Just over 6 per cent of the homes in East Devon failed to secure this standard, predominantly due to inadequate heating or insulation.

Councillor Dan Ledger (Independent, Seaton), the cabinet member for sustainable homes and communities, said the positive review from the regulator was “one of our biggest achievements”.

“Only 21 organisations have secured a C2 rating or higher, so we are right up there,” he said.

“I can’t thank Catrin [Stark, the director of housing and health] and the senior directors enough, they’ve done such great work”

In terms of health and safety, the council said it was “broadly compliant” and has, by working with the UK Health and Security Agency, actively addressed areas of elevated radon risk.

It said it was also improving its oversight of health and safety issues, and is improving the process used for reporting issues with properties..

The council also said it had revised its procedures for dealing with complaints and looked at how it reports data on the likes of improvements and repairs to tenants.

Cllr Ledger added that inspection confirmed the progress the council’s housing team was making, including investing in better data to engaging tenants and addressing areas of improvements.

“The Regulator of Social Housing’s judgement provides a strong platform for further progress and helps us focus on where we can do better,” he said.

“We’ll continue working closely with the regulator as we move towards meeting C1 standards, while keeping our tenants at the heart of everything we do.”

A spokesperson for the council said work was occurring in all the areas that the regulator assessed, which helped it secure the C2 rating, and that it was now working on a plan to try and reach the highest C1 level.

The RSH began its inspection programme of inspecting large social landlords – housing associations and councils with more than 1,000 homes – on 1 April 2024.

The inspections are planned to take place every four years and are one of the key changes to RSH’s approach resulting from the landmark Social Housing Regulation Act.