“East Devon is not an island” and so must look after Exeter’s needs

So says EDDC Leader Paul Diviani.

Well, we are already looking after Exeter’s employment needs with the move to Skypark so we might as well look after their housing needs too.  At least Karim Hassan (former regeneration chief at EDDC and now CEO of Exeter Ciry Council) will be happy!

But perhaps it is now time for South Somerset to take care of some of East Devon’s needs … or perhaps a new town in the Blackdown Hills?  Or maybe an overspill estate in Lyme Regis.

How come we get to take care of everyone else yet no-one takes care of us?

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/news/local_plan_verdict_more_work_needed_1_3521166

Talaton – unsustainable developments turned down

Update from a local correspondent.

Applications for 10 and 25 houses at Weeks Farm, Talaton went before the DMC on 1st April, supported by the Parish Council and Ward Councillor Martin Gammell in spite of strong local opposition. Residents were very pleased to see that Planning Officers had recommended refusal for both applications as being unsustainable for such a small village as Talaton and commended the Officers for the thoroughness of their report.

Speakers pointed to the pressure on existing services, with oversubscribed primary and secondary schools, poor transport provision and sewage systems near capacity. After some discussion, the Committee voted to refuse both applications. One of the Councillors commented that if they allowed these applications to go through it would set a precedent, giving a ‘green light’ for small villages to be swamped by developments that were not sustainable.

An Inspector writes: and it is really bad news

The inspector’s letter

Click to access letterno8toeastdevon.pdf

finds that the Local Plan draft is fundamentally flawed when ut comes to housing numbers but does not mention employment land which he presumably feels is fine.

Developers and former EDBF members must be delirious with joy.

How long will it take to sort out?  Months and months or years and years judging by past performance.  And all that time the developers will be choking us with little boxes to the north, south, east and west, in tiny villages, in towns, in (particularly) the countryside.

Well done EDDC, well done.

Neighbourhood Plans – not a panacea but useful

Ottery St. Mary is thinking of setting aside obe-eighth of its precept (£20,000) to produce a neighbourhood plan.  “This money is one eighth of the budget,” he said. “Would the neighbourhood plan have had any difference to the 300 houses planned for Ottery St Mary?”

Answer: no.  Whilst there is no Local Plan and no 6 year land supply developers have the upper hand.

Once there is a Local Plan, that trumps everything including Neighbourhood Plans, so, at the moment a Neighbourhood Plan counts for nothing.

However, once there IS a Local Plan AND a 6 year land supply, any neighbourhood can then say what it wants to happen to any land not covered by the Local Plan.

It is certainly best if a council then puts together a Neighbourhood Plan because, if it does not, ANY group which has a connection to the area can take responsibility for preparing one, which could mean developers or Sainsbury’s or any other group with a tenuous connection to the area could put one together and might get it agreed.

However, East Devon District Council has the final say in whether a Neighbourhood Plan is acceptable to them – back to Square One!  Also, no agreed Neighbourhood Plan has yet faced legal challenge so who is to say that it would carry the full force of planning law – there are many instances of challenges being successful in similar circumstances.  Until enough case law is built up we can only hope that a well-researched, well-written Neighbourhood Plan with lots of robust evidence would meet these challenges.

So, an outlay of £20,000 might or might not protect Ottery from some inappropriate or unwanted development so perhaps on balance better to try than not!

 

Who pays?

We learn from a comment from Councillor Roger Giles on the blog of Councillor Claire Wright (claire-wright.org) that the reason given for making it so difficult for ordinary people to speak at Development Management Committee meetings is that the lack of a 5 year land supply means that there are now so many applications that there just is not time.  He also points out that one other reason that there is not time is that members of the DMC speak at length and repetitiously and then generally vote in a very similar way, few needing to be swayed by the intellectual arguments of other members it seems.

How dreadful that we must pay for EDDC’s own past and present mistakes.

So when we have a new Local Plan – hopefully very soon – and the number of planning applications decreases, will we then go back to former arrangements where we did not have to register with a written question days in advance and hope that we won the lottery to speak?

Aaaah …..

 

Remember when we asked for extra time for consultations?

Usually over planning matters where sneaky developers dropped in applications over Christmas or summer holidays or when we wanted more time to consider important things like the move to Skypark?  And all the times we were told we had been given plenty of time?

Well, now the boot is on the other foot: EDDC wanting (rightly) more time to respond to the cuts being made by DCC, particularly those affecting young people.

http://www.eastdevon.gov.uk/communications_and_consultation.htm?newsid=1059

Let’s hope they are luckier than we have been!

R.I.P Pinhoe Village – mostly thanks to EDDC – and even EDDC’s own councillors question the need to make the decision so quickly

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Approval-800-homes-outskirts-Exeter-8220-8217/story-20892905-detail/story.html

and in more detail, including quotes from EDDC councillors here:

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Critics-hit-8216-premature-8217-decision-build-1/story-20892918-detail/story.html

“At the meeting Liberal Democrat East Devon district ward member for Broadclyst, Councillor Derek Button said: “This land is the lungs of Exeter and should never be built on.”

Prior to the meeting, the Devon branch of the Campaign to Protect Rural England raised concerns about the scale of the applications in the green wedge.

Member for Broadclyst, Conservative Councillor Peter Bowden, questioned why the plans could not have been heard after the Local Plan inspector’s ruling. “It would have been perfectly in order to extend the time for the applications to be heard in order for the Local Plan Inspector’s report to have been published first,” he said.”

It will be recalled that one of the applications is from one of the former East Devon Business Forum’s founder members.

Common sense rules for Talaton – at least today

From a correspondent (the view expressed is personal):

Both applications were refused 10:2 & 11:1.

Malcolm was brilliant.  Councillor Gammell spoke as ward member then took part & voted, but kept coming back & speaking

Doubtless they will appeal …..

Builders “churning out same old boxes” says Grand Designs Kevin McLeod

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/greenpolitics/planning/10731464/Builders-churning-out-same-old-boxes-says-Kevin-McCloud.html

More East Devon farmland to be lost to development? No joking matter, as DMC decides tomorrow, April 1st.

Please note that the Weeks Farm application is up before EDDC’s Development Management Committee tomorrow morning ,Tuesday 1st April, from 9.30 am, at Knowle.
EDDC officers have recommended this application be refused on the grounds that the development will not be sustainable, given the lack of employment opportunities, access to schools, lack of adequate sewerage capacity, etc. But one local Councillor and DMC member has already declared his support for the application, despite a public consultation which shows the majority of his constituents do not.
The Talaton group would be most grateful if you can spare the time to attend in support of their objections, in their efforts to prevent yet another bad planning decision going ahead in the face of local opposition.

Agenda here: http://www.eastdevon.gov.uk/combined_dmc_agenda_010414.pdf

 

Warwickshire County Council makes dawn raid on district councils on unity bid

Today Warwickshire, tomorrow Devon?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-26812512

That would put the wind up a good few local councillors!

Local Plan Inspector’s letter has been received by EDDC but will not be published by them before Thursday 3 April (after the next Development Management Committee on 1 April where 10 planning applications will be discussed

How fortuitous that the Local Plan Inspector’s letter (which EDDC has now received) will not be released until at least Thursday 3 April 2014, after yet another Development Control Committee meeting on 1 April 2014 where 629 more houses will be discussed, including a further 590 at Cranbrook.

Pots and kettles

If only EDDC could learn from its own criticism of Ottery St Mary Council!

 

http://www.devon24.co.uk/news/report_calls_for_better_behaviour_at_ottery_council_1_3511938….. ground rules for behaviour during meetings

…..  ‘misjudgements’ had been made by both officers and councillors, and that it would be appropriate for the council to ‘reflect on events and their behaviour’ to ‘consider what they might learn for the future’

….. respectful relationships and a focus on well-managed debate

Oh, if only EDDC had insight!

 

 

And it is only going to get worse says climate change report

The climate change report prepared for the United Nations makes grim reading.  For those of us in this area the particular issues are the loss of Grade 1 agricultural land, because much less land is going to be available for us to grow the crops we have been used to, particularly wheat, and flooding – more of it more often.

See a summary of the report here:

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/mar/31/climate-change-report-ipcc-governments-unprepared-live-coverage

“Mafia- style behaviour in the planning system,” says National Trust

A furious Sir Simon Jenkins believes ” the housing problems of Britain will not be solved in the countryside” . This Daily Telegraph report explains his good reasons  : http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CC4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.telegraph.co.uk%2Fearth%2Fhands-off-our-land%2F10730643%2FMafia-style-behaviour-in-the-planning-system-is-traumatising-villages-suggests-Sir-Simon-Jenkins.html&ei=60A5U77NF8ix0AWMyYGoAw&usg=AFQjCNF1FHvnBVNjFNNxgUjVmJimEkMOug&bvm=bv.63808443,d.d2k

The Friday quiz

What geographical area is being described here?

“Our rulers need to understand democracy is not solely about getting a majority of votes in the ballot box … Far beyond that, democracy is a culture of inclusiveness, openness, human rights and freedom of speech, for each and every one, regardless of whichever party they voted for.  It is the realisation of the very core of democracy that has been sorely lacking in [this place] today”.

No, not East Devon – Turkey – but it could just as well apply here.  Citizens denied a voice at committees, particularly a voice at planning committees, where committees (particularly the Overview and Scrutiny Committee and its Task and Finish group on the East Devon Business Foru,, all of us who are not the favoured few apparently denied a voice before the all-powerful Executive and the Executive in thrall to its Leader and the CEO.

 

 

 

EDA anger at how EDDC decision was taken for more mass housing on Grade 1 farmland.

This EDA press release was issued yesterday, 27th March 2014 :

‘East Devon Alliance (EDA) is appalled by the circumstances of this week’s decision by EDDC to approve more mass housing in the western end of East Devon.

In a specially called meeting of the Development Management Committee (DMC), on Tuesday 25th March, two major planning applications for a total of 1200 houses, were lumped together, in one executive summary. Yet councillors were obliged to vote on the first application before hearing details of the second, related one. Thus, the proposals’ combined impact on the communities of Broadclyst, Westclyst, Poltimore and Pinhoe , was taken out of the debate.

East Devon Alliance questions why these two planning applications, at Old Park Farm and Pinn Court Farm respectively, involving a member of the now defunct East Devon Business Forum, were rushed through in inexplicable haste. DMC Chair, Helen Parr, refused requests from some members to defer a decision until the soundness of EDDC’s Planning Policy has been assessed in the Inspector’s report (expected sometime this summer).

Most shockingly, councillors who voted in favour, acknowledged that much of both sites to be built on is Grade 1 agricultural land.

Ian McKintosh, EDA Chair, says, “This is madness, when the National Farmers’ Union is already warning that demand for farmland will soon outstrip supply. EDDC’s current planning policy is causing the loss of much high quality fertile land. All that will feed is a future food security crisis. It’s time for our planners to pause, and listen to local people with insights, especially at meetings of the DMC “. ‘

“You have given permission for 1,200 homes” DMC Chair told

Those were Councillor Bowden’s words at the end of yesterday’s ‘special meeting’  of the Development Management Committee (DMC), which approved two major planning applications for housing on Old Park and Pinn Court Farms, in East Devon’s already blighted west end. He echoed the dismay and incredulity of residents from Broadclyst, Westclyst, Poltimore and Pinhoe who had spoken out at the meeting, about such things as the “suburban form and layout ” of the proposed developments; flooding and increased traffic dangers; and overlooking of existing houses.

Probably the most serious issue of all was raised by  members of the DMC. They asked whether the two related planning applications  were intended to be decided separately, or lumped together as they had been in the  executive summary which had been provided  for this meeting.  As Cllr Bowden pointed out, the decision on the first would “impact on” the second, and the totality of them both was a very different matter from considering them as individual items. But Cllr Mike Allen’s reasonable proposal that “we should hear the second application and then make our decision”, was firmly blocked by Chair  Helen Parr’s “No!”

Puzzling, as both applications involved, in Cllr Williamson’s words,   “loss of agricultural land, much of it Grade 1”. “We keep hearing about this agricultural land”, said the Chair, somewhat irritably, reminding her Committee that  “It is unfortunately wonderful agricultural land” that the Growth Point is built on.

Her theme was picked up by  Councillor Key, EDDC’s representative on the East Devon branch of the Campaign to Protect Rural England. He chipped in with, “They keep on about this Green Wedge….and farmland. Irrespective of what grade it is, houses are needed.”  Or as Cllr Chamberlain simply put it,  to gasps from the public,  wasn’t the Green Wedge   “the n****r in the woodpile”?

This was of course the considered view of the Local Development Framework Panel , as illustrated in these minutes, including declarations of personal interest (p. 4), from 2010:   http://www.eastdevon.gov.uk/ldf_panel_minutes_110310.pdf  .