Why has the Old Park Farm planning application been pushed forward? ‘Special’ DMC meeting tomorrow at Knowle.

Disturbing evidence about a major planning application for mass housing on farmland (at Pinn Court Farm and Old Park Farm, Broadclyst) , has been brought to EDA’s attention. A Development Management Committee ‘special meeting’ has been called to decide on the planning application, tomorrow (Tues. 25th March, 2pm at Knowle).
For a copy of the agenda, please see following link… EDDC Dev Man Ctee Agenda
For a list of objections, please see 13/0001/MOUT and 13/2447/MOUT at Planning Portal

Seminar for tourism businesses hit by storms

No, of course it isn’t being organised by EDDC!  For them tourism doesn’t seem to exist.

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Tourism-event-look-overcoming-storm-challenges/story-20839361-detail/story.html

CPRE says Devon villages under siege by developers

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Report-Devon-villages-8220-siege-8221-developers/story-20843687-detail/story.html

and this is how it was reported in the Daily Mail:

“Rural towns and villages are being placed under siege by the threat of 700,000 new homes in the countryside, according to a hard- hitting report.

Almost 200,000 of these are earmarked for supposedly protected Green Belt land thanks to the Government’s changes to planning laws, the Campaign to Protect Rural England warns today.

Its report reveals that just 84 local authorities – a quarter of those outside London – propose to prioritise building on brownfield sites.

A study of planning decisions also shows that 39 major housing developments in the year to March 2013, totalling 8,700 new houses on greenfield land, were given the green light after an appeal by developers – double the number the year before.

Some 17 appeals were granted personally by Communities Secretary Eric Pickles. In another 14 cases councils simply abandoned their objections because they feared losing on appeal.

The CPRE claims that the overall proportion of major appeals granted has risen to  46 per cent, up from 31.7 per cent in 2008-09.

The report has been written to coincide with the second anniversary this week of the Coalition’s National Planning Policy Framework, which established a presumption in favour of ‘sustainable development’ to kickstart house building.

But a third of all councils still do not have a Local Plan for development in place. These are supposed to give more power to residents and town hall chiefs to resist unwanted development.

The CPRE says the changes have led to an ‘unnecessary loss of countryside’ and have left some towns and villages facing the prospect of changing out of all recognition. At Kentford in Suffolk, proposals for 340 new homes are expected to double the size of the village.

At Warton in Lancashire, 1,365 homes are to be built in a town of just 3,573 houses – expected to lead to a population increase of up to 92 per cent.

The report says: ‘The most recent Government figures state that there is enough suitable brownfield land available for 1,500,000 new houses. Emerging and adopted Local Plans are, however, proposing significant amounts of building on greenfield land.

The CPRE says the changes have led to an ‘unnecessary loss of countryside’

‘We estimate that land has been allocated for 729,000 new houses, of which 190,000 are in the Green Belt. These sites are often on the edge of country towns and villages.’ It adds: ‘Many of these “villages under siege” are faced with planning applications proposing development well in excess of the amount envisaged in emerging or adopted Local Plans.’

Shaun Spiers, chief executive of the CPRE, said the report provided ‘firm evidence’ that the Government’s planning reforms were not achieving their stated aims.

He added: ‘Far from community control of local development, we are seeing councils under pressure to disregard local democracy to meet top-down targets.

‘Local authorities are having to agree fanciful housing numbers and allocate huge areas of greenfield land to meet them. Where they lack an up-to-date plan, the countryside is up for grabs and many villages feel under siege from developers.’

Planning Minister Nick Boles said the report was ‘inaccurate, exaggerated and based on a spurious analysis of the facts’, adding: ‘We have given councils the power to shape where the new homes our country needs should and shouldn’t go.’

The “we must decide this within 13 weeks” excuse for determining “Old Park Farm 2”

Which reinforces the fact that there seems to be absolutely no reason for a special meeting just days in advance of the first communication from the Planning Inspector – due by 31 March 2014.

Taken from a comment on claire-wright.org by Rose Pengelly:

OUTLINE PLANNING APPLICATION 13/0001/MOUT – OLD PARK FARM
East Devon District Council have accommodated this Special Development Management Meeting to consider an Outline Planning Application not in the Local Plan and is making an attempt to fast-track a decision.

The Councils reason made in a statement to the press are not true, this is what the guidelines say Determining a planning application:

What are the time periods for determining a planning application?
Paragraph: 001 Reference ID: 21b-001-20140306

Once a planning application has been validated, the local planning authority should make a decision on the proposal as quickly as possible, and in any event within the statutory time limit unless a longer period is agreed in writing with the applicant.

The statutory time limits are usually 13 weeks for applications for major development and eight weeks for all other types of development (unless an application is subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment, in which case a 16 week limit applies).

Where a planning application takes longer than the statutory period to decide, and an extended period has not been agreed with the applicant, the Government’s policy is that the decision should be made within 26 weeks at most in order to comply with the ‘planning guarantee’.

Revision date: 06 03 2014
Paragraph: 002 Reference ID: 21b-002-20140306
What is the Government’s ‘planning guarantee’?

The planning guarantee is the Government’s policy that no application should spend more than a year with decision-makers, including any appeal.

In practice this means that planning applications should be decided in no more than 26 weeks, allowing a similar period for any appeal.

The planning guarantee does not replace the statutory time limits for determining planning applications.
Revision date: 06 03 2014

The “Old Park Farm 2” planning application and its “special Development Management Committee meeting” on 25 March 2014 – what you can do

This is the planning application that does not figure either in the old Local Plan nor the new one- part of this development is from a former East Devon Business Forum member.  The inspector who heard evidence regarding the new Local Plan has promised to communicate his initial findings to EDDC by 31 March 2014.

EDDC says that it “must” decide this planning application within 13 weeks of receiving it.  This is not true.  A council CAN wait longer than 13 weeks to determine a planning application (and many do) but a developer could then appeal because it has taken too long.  However, it is possible that before the developer could appeal on this particular planning application the Planning Inspector might indicate that there is no need for the two developments in this area. In In which case more than 400 extra houses will be built which are not needed.

There is a debate about exactly when that time runs out – it could be early April depending on when you think the last documents were put on the EDDC website.  However, EDDC officers have rushed through a “special” meeting to hear this application before the Planning Inspector’s comments arrive.  Also, there is another DMC meeting on 1 April 2014 and we are entitled to ask:  why is it necessary to hear this application on 25 March (before the Inspector reports) when there is a meeting on 1 April (after the Inspector reports)?

If you want to object to this state of affairs, there are several things you can do:

1.  Turn up at the Development Management Committee meeting on 25 March 2014 at 2 pm and make your views known – you will have up to 3 minutes to speak (provided you do not repeat statements already made by other speakers).

2.  You can write to your local district councillors (if you are not sure who your councillor is find out HERE).

3.  You are allowed to write to individual members of the Development Management Committee individually (using the link to councillors HERE)

4.  Write to your local MP, Hugo Swire, HERE,  telling him how unhappy you are about this.

5.  Write letters to local newspapers about it (and national newspapers if you wish too)

News summary, March 2014

It has been a full 12 months since Graham Brown was forced to resign after boasting he could obtain planning permission ‘for a price’. To mark the occasion, EDA has publicly called for a progress report into the ongoing police investigation.
For full report, please see… 
At the Local Plan Inspections, SOS legal representative Charlie Hopkins pointed out the EDDC had refused to allow the inspector to see the valuation report on the Knowle, on the grounds of ‘commercial confidentiality’!
For full report see…
It also emerged this month that the preferred site for the relocation, SkyPark, is not included in the current bus timetables and it will cost £100,000 a year to introduce a new service. EDDC assurances, that a route could be funded through S106 contributions to ensure the move would not make it more difficult for constituents and job-seekers to access their offices, have now been refuted by Devon County Council, who confirmed SkyPark cannot be included in the bus timetables owing to time constraints. For full report see…
At EDDC’s “Become a Councillor” event held at Knowle, tough questions were asked by Youth Parliament representative Alfie Weaver, about Cllr. Mouldings decision to vote against their right to speak at the Devon County Council Budget meeting. For a full report on the evenings event, please see…
Please also see link for Sidmouth Sea Fest being held on 21st April – Easter Monday

Budleigh and Ladram Bay on Environment Agency blacklist

.IMG

Last weekend’s Sunday Times article (16 March 2014, p. 19) lists two East Devon bathing beaches amongst 45 in the UK at risk of permanent closure because of sewage contamination. They could be “stripped of their designation as bathing waters from 2015. Visitors would be warned by prominent signs that the water was unsafe to bathe in”, the Environment Agency’s head of bathing waters, Christine Tuckett, told the newspaper.
“About a third of the pollution comes from agriculture, a third from point sources like sewage works and the rest is down to random factors like misconnected drains,” said Tuckett.

So what could the pollution sources be at Budleigh Salterton and Ladram Bay? Here’s a look, first, at Ladram Bay, where the expanding caravan site would be hard hit if its customers couldn’t swim from the lovely beach it leads to.
P1030032P1030038P1030048

P1030042

We’ll ask local residents about the Budleigh pollution problem, for a follow-up post.

News from Honiton (Part 2) . Thelma Hulbert Gallery not fit for purpose.

The record of the EDDC Cabinet decision (5th March, 2014) concerning the Thelma Hulbert Gallery (THG), Honiton, notes that Cllrs David Cox and Ian Thomas insisted that their votes against the recommendation ‘to set the Gallery on a sustainable footing’ were recorded. This unwonted move may be a first indication that previously loyal councillors are no longer prepared to automatically follow their Leader.

The Gallery, a favourite project of Cllr Paul Diviani, is fast losing money. EDDC are unwilling to reveal the scale of the losses, which are purported to be in the region of £120,000 per annum. This apparently does not take into account the officer time required to run the project, nor the cost of the building, nor the rates. The true annual cost of THG could therefore be closer to £200,000 (the anticipated saving in running costs achieved by relocating the District Council HQ to Skypark!).

During the Cabinet debate, the original business plan was described as being ‘overambitious’, and the gallery itself as ‘a significant liability’ to EDDC. The figure for annual visitors is believed to be around 8,000, made up largely of school parties. EDA has been reliably informed that adult visitor numbers per day can often be counted on the fingers of one hand. Does this mean that every visit is subsidised to the tune of £20-25 by the council tax payers of East Devon? The shop and cafe are reputedly cramped and very poor. And the enormously over-priced pieces of art on sale remain seriously unsold. If ever a building was not ‘fit for purpose’, it seems to be this one.

The 5th March 2014 Cabinet minutes, including Thelma Hulbert Gallery Business Plan-key decision pp 116-117, can be read at this link http://www.eastdevon.gov.uk/cabinet_agenda_mins_remit

News from Honiton (part 1)

A campaign to save a Honiton day centre from closure, made the front page of the Midweek Herald this week. EDA followers concerned by priorities in County Council cost-cutting might like to take a minute to sign the associated online petition, and ask friends to do so too. They just need to live in Devon to be able to sign. Honiton Town Councillor Sharon Pavey, who leads the campaign, is one of the signatories of the EDA Charter.
Details here: http://www.sharonpavey.org/save-st-michaels-day-centre

Local Government Ombudsman found EDDC at fault

The Chief Executive, Mark Williams, reported to Cabinet earlier this month, that the Ombudsman’s ‘recent finding of fault’ has been addressed by East Devon District Council. See page 109 at this link http://www.eastdevon.gov.uk/cabinet_mins_050314.pdf

“Skypark is blossoming”, says EDDC Leader

‘Exciting times for East Devon’ is the caption to a photo on p 19 of today’s Mid Week Herald. The photo in question shows Cllrs Diviani and Moulding at a ‘Pie and Pud’ presentation on Cranbrook and the East Devon Growth Point. Despite Cllr Diviani’s optimistic comment about Skypark, 4 years into the marketing of the project, there’s not much evident sign of Spring on site (nor at Cranbrook!) : https://eastdevonwatch.org/2014/03/16/skypark-knowle/

EDDC spin papers over the cracks!

See http://sidmouthindependentnews.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/communication-in-politics/
and our own report on the same meeting: https://eastdevonwatch.org/2014/03/14/why-stand-for-election-ask-the-younger-generation/

Planning policy blight reaches PM’s own patch

See Daily Telegraph report referenced here: http://sidmouthindependentnews.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/no-prime-minister-planning-in-his-own-back-yard/

“They’re not making new farmland,” warns NFU.

At a conference organised yesterday by the Devon WI (Our Changing Countryside. What does the future hold?), National Farmers’ Union (NFU) spokesman, Andrew Butler, warned of the dangers of “taking land out of the system, for urbanisation”.The NFU predicts increasing volatility in staples (rice, soya, wheat), leading to issues of food security and permanently rising food prices.There’s a need “to look more at the economic and social asset of farmland”, he said.
So the plan to lose two more East Devon farms to mass development seems seriously misguided. The urbanisation of Pinn Court Farm and Old Park Farm, (near Pinhoe and Westclyst), involves key players in the curiously collapsed East Devon Business Forum. What do EDDC officers think about this planning application? Details at this link:

http://sidmouthindependentnews.wordpress.com/2014/03/17/the-special-development-management-committee-meeting-express-and-echo/

CranBROOK

Cranbrook city centre...floods of interest

Will West End overdevelopment add to the flood risk on the River Clyst floodplain? Steven Moore of the Environment Agency recently assured EDA member, Graham Cooper, that flood risk measures for the Intermodal and Skypark have been fully in place for a number of years. He explained that the country park at the Intermodal and Cranbrook had lagoons in place and there were sub surface water retention tanks at Skypark.
The above photograph taken earlier this month, before any substantial development has taken place, appears to give other signals, as did the EA severe flood warnings in place for the area on 4th March, when the main A3052 was also flooded.

Skypark/ Knowle.

SkyparkEarthSkyparkP1030079Knowle aerial view

Photos above supplied for those who are not familiar with the two sites. EDDC plans to relocate its HQ from the tranquillity and parkland of Knowle, Sidmouth,just a short walk away from town centre shops. The present buildings will be demolished to pay for newbuild offices, possibly at the vast new fledgling business park (recently declared as the Cabinet’s preferred site), located next to Exeter airport.

“Why stand for election?” Ask the younger generation….

A special event at Knowle yesterday evening, involving the Parliamentary Outreach Service , was excellently organised by EDDC officers. Around 80 people attended the event, which had been advertised as an advice evening for prospective councillors. The session began well with a lively talk by Elizabeth Price of the Parliamentary Outreach service, who gave a quick overview of Parliament. The audience, including EDDC Leader Paul Diviani,listened attentively as she explained how its essential role is to hold government to account, represent the public, and to raise key issues. They also heard about parliamentary processes and, usefully, how to raise an issue in Parliament. The informal cross-party groups (All Party Parliamentary Groups, APPGs), may be of particular help to EDA as a member of Community Voice on Planning (www.covop.org). Ms Price also made a reference that seemed especially apt to the Knowle venue: she quoted Winston Churchill’s words, “We shape our buildings, and our buildings shape us”.

Julien Bassham of the Cabinet Office then described the Individual Electoral Registration (IER) reform which will be introduced in June 2014. It will concern only those people newly applying to register to vote, who will be required to give their Department of Work and Pension number along with their name. The aim is to prevent electoral fraud,largely in postal voting, where registration has sometimes been made by household. Questions from the audience showed some concern that this huge IT exercise could go awry (as with the NHS). We’ll soon see!

The high standard of presentations was impressively continued by George Downs and Alfie Weaver, speaking about the work of the Youth Parliament, the British Youth Council, and Devon Youth Service. George described various community action projects in detail, including the ‘Make Your Mark’ initiative to encourage young people to get involved, with the message that “Issues that matter, are politics in disguise”. Alfie stressed that the Devon Youth Service has no Party affiliation, but is “issue-affiliated”.

What a contrast this was, to the political mindset of the following speaker, EDDC Deputy Leader, Andrew Moulding. His closing talk was mostly based on trivialities (dogs harrassing political canvassers) and the implication that opponents’ leaflets (in this case, Councillor Douglas Hull’s) are only fit for the dustbin. No attempt was made to inform the listeners about what councillors do. This abysmal anti-climax to the evening provoked a sharp reaction from the audience. Further details reported here:http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/sparks_fly_at_eddc_elections_event_this_evening

A new bus service via Skypark would cost £100,000 a year

A new bus service via Skypark could cost £100,000 a year, confirm senior officers at Devon County Council.

Officers also confirm that the existing 4 service timetable would not permit it to be diverted into Skypark, due to time constraints.

At last month’s EDDC full council meeting, the conservative group voted in favour of starting detailed negotiations to buy land at Skypark for almost £1m and build new offices there.

Cllr Roger Giles (Independent – Ottery Town), who sought information from Dave Black (Head of Planning and Transportation at DCC) said: “The message shows that the claims made by EDDC cabinet member, Cllr Ray Bloxham – that an existing service will be diverted into Skypark – are wrong.

Cllr Ray Bloxham, EDDC Corporate Business Portfolioholder recently said that “a bus service currently passing Skypark will be diverted to serve stops within Skypark when it is completed”.

Roger Giles said: “In fact Mr Black demonstrates that it will be difficult and expensive to achieve a service into Skypark at all.”

Roger Giles also said: “The other great concern I have is that if a direct bus service to Skypark is achieved, is it will only provide a service for Cranbrook and Exeter residents.

“There would be no direct bus service for people living in the rest of East Devon.”

“By relocating from Sidmouth to Skypark on the edge of Exeter, EDDC will damage the economy of Sidmouth, and it will damage the economy of East Devon as a whole.

East Devon`s loss, will be Exeter`s gain.”

Concerns were expressed at EDDC’s full council by residents and councillors, that Skypark would be inaccessible for East Devon residents and EDDC staff who would have to relocate because of its location close to Exeter, and its lack of a direct bus service.

At the EDDC meeting on 26 February Cllr Roger Giles tabled a written question about the practicality of diverting the 4 (Exeter Cranbrook – Ottery – Honiton – Axminster) bus service into Skypark, because the tight timetable would probably not permit it.

Cllr Ray Bloxham in his written answer, and his answer to Roger Giles` supplementary question, was dismissive. He accused Roger Giles of “grandstanding”.

Subsequently Roger Giles wrote to Dave Black, about the matter. DCC is the authority responsible for bus services.

Dave Black also says: “Negotiations have been on-going with Science Park and SkyPark concerning contributions towards bus services. It is expected that these contributions would enable the funding of a new service between Cranbrook and Exeter, routing through Skypark and Science Park which would supplement the existing 30 minute frequency bus service.”

Inspector is denied access to full Knowle costs

See report on yesterday’s continuation of the Sidmouth hearing: http://saveoursidmouth.com/2014/03/12/knowle-evidence-at-inspectors-disposal-is-inadequate-says-sos-legal-representative/

East Devon Alliance calls for progress report on police investigation into Graham Brown affair.

It is now twelve months since the Daily Telegraph ‘Councillors-for-hire’ report, which included an undercover filmed interview with Graham Brown before his consequent resignation from East Devon District Council and from the powerful East Devon Business Forum, which he chaired.
There was an unfortunate delay of some months before the investigation started, and three changes of leadership of the case have since occurred. More on this disquieting matter has been published today, at this link: http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Police-confirm-investigating-Graham-Brown-year/story-20793167-detail/story.html