Why did the draft Local Plan fall at the first hurdle?

We will be examining this subject over the next few days and possibly weeks. In the meantime, here is an extract from a report commissioned in 2009 by EDDC officers from the Planning Advisory Service when it appears to have become evident that the (then secret) Local Development Framework Panel (Chair, ex- councillor Brown) was already perceived as being in difficulty:

… there is a potential danger that a positive steer from the Panel that these [the very limited number of sites they are examining] are suitable sites is leading to the initiation of premature pre- application discussions for sites which would be ‘departures’ from the current development plan. Although the LDF views are given without prejudice they appear to be being made without the scenario testing of alternative options, the use of sustainability appraisal and the explicit assessment of how they fit in with the long term vision.

The development management team (although in attendance at the Panel) and other key stakeholders appear not be involved in early discussions prior to the presentations to the Panel. This is creating a tension as the development management team feel that sites are coming forward which are not consistent with the development plan or delivering the key corporate priorities but possibly are to deliver other objectives e.g. roads.

There is concern that this is seen as reacting to local agendas rather than positive planning towards a long term vision for the district and likely to lead to ad- hoc decisions being taken.

A mechanism needs to be established to ensure this is not the case and that there is a more open debate perhaps through the corporate management team.

‘What do they know’ about Knowle relocation?

EDDC has formally been asked for critical calculations, and other details. See https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/relocation_from_the_knowle#incoming-507521

Youth Parliament stages march tomorrow (Saturday) Exeter 11am

The Youth Parliament will be staging a march to protest the £1 Million DCC cuts to their services.

The march begins at 11 am and leaves from the entrance to Princess Hay on the high street and will make its way down to the Devon County Council offices, where they will formally present their petition.

The Youth Parliament has members from all over East Devon and they will be joined by members from North, South and Mid Devon, Cornwall and Bristol.

Still think WE are to blame for failure of the Local Plan EDDC?

There has been a concerted effort recently at EDDC meetings to blame us, the public, for failure of the draft Local plan because we are all NIMBYs and forced EDDC (we know not how) to reduce housing numbers against their collective will.

Let us then revisit this statement, made in December 2010, by EDDC’s then Leader, Sara Randall Johnson:

29 December 2010

Ms Randall Johnson said with support from partners including the Exeter Civic Centre and Devon County Council, EDDC is “bucking the national trend” and forging ahead with a reputation for delivering growth.

“I do understand the concerns of some that expansion must not jeopardise our delightful East Devon environment,” she continued. “And I couldn’t agree more. We now believe some of our housing and employment building estimates may have been too high and I have ordered a complete review of this strategy with a report due in the summer.”

Read more: http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Council-leader-pledges-review-housing-plans/story-11685408-detail/story.html#ixzz2zud6rmwM

Devon County Council “is a business” says its Leader

But, unfortunately, its “shareholders” are not allowed to talk to it:

http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/asking_for_young_campaigners_to_speak_at_february_budget_meeting_was_an_amb

In the past Councillor Diviani has also referred to EDDC as a business and officers have referred to developers as its clients.

Our only role as “stakeholders” appears to be to vote them in or out in 2015. Other than that, we should, apparently, be shut up.

Tell Andrew Moulding and EDDC what YOU think!

District council bosses have refuted claims their Local Plan was not ready to be submitted last August – or the continuing delay in confirming the blueprint means East Devon is set for a developers’ free-for-all
Campaigners last week branded the authority ‘shambolic’ and called for a ‘root and branch reform’.

Councillor Andrew Moulding, East Devon District Council (EDDC) cabinet member for strategic development and partnerships, said: “The inspector’s response to our plan was one that has been replicated across the country.
“A paper produced last month by consultancy Nathaniel Litchfield & Partners (NLP) found that local plans are taking longer to get through the examination process and more are being delayed because of problems over housing assessment.

“Their review of 109 local plans that had been examined since the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) came into force two years ago found that many have effectively stalled because of the NPPF’s requirement for authorities to meet ‘objectively assessed needs’ for housing. The consultancy reported that just 40 of the 109 plans have been found sound, while a quarter of these are subject to immediate or early review, chiefly because of housing issues. Some 15 plans have been withdrawn, with the main reason being the provision of housing. The consultancy also noted that more plans were in difficulty after failing to meet the ‘duty to cooperate’ requirement.

“More than 50 per cent of English local planning authorities outside London have yet to formally publish local plans since the introduction of the NPPF. Inspectors want to avoid future challenges and potential judicial reviews and therefore look for objectively assessed information contained in local plans.”

Cllr Moulding said warnings of a developers’ free-for-all were ‘scaremongering by those who have an agenda of belittling the council’s efforts’. He claimed the council has an ‘enviable record’ when it comes to defending and winning planning appeals.

“Experience shows that our policy of saying ‘yes’ to sustainable development and ‘no’ to over-development is standing us in good stead,” he added. “We remain confident that the latest version of the plan is not too far off being a document that finds favour with the planning inspector, once we have completed the extra work he has requested. In this, we are in the company of a good number of other English local authorities that are working hard to find the right balance between housing demand and quality of life.”
l What do you think?

Email us your thoughts at sidmouth.letters@archant.co.uk.

EDDC refutes campaigners’ Local Plan criticism – News – Sidmouth Herald