Titbits from agenda papers of the next (non) Overview and (non) Scrutiny Committee

Meeting on Thursday 13 November 2014 at 6.30 pm http://new.eastdevon.gov.uk/media/476265/131114-os-agenda-combined.pdf

Titbits from the current Overview and Scrutiny agenda

Council promises 2014-16

One area of concern flagged red:

Area: Continue development at Cranbrook and elsewhere to ensure best quality of build and design of homes, high street and public spaces.

Concern: While development continues apace there are concerns about the future of Cranbrook and the need for a masterplan to guide development moving forward to ensure that the best quality of build and design is achieved.

Our translation: Cranbrook is not living up to expectations and because we didn’t plan properly in the first place we are going to have to throw money at this problem.

Also interesting variations:

Area: Make sure that new developments are supported with the right level of investment in infrastructure to benefit the community.

Variation: There remains a concern that viability issues with developments is making it difficult to secure the full level of invesment in infrastruture that is necessary to meet the needs of the development, however it is hoped that as the economy continues to grow that viability will improve.

Our translation: No local plan = no Community Infrastructure Levy = no community infrastructure.

Area: Develop the business case and governance arrangements for setting up a trust for the Thelma Hulbert Gallery.

Variation: This is no longer being pursued – LED had been asked to look at the possibility of running the THG but had decided against taking the gallery under their operations.

Our translation: THG is bleeding money and we can’t find a way to stop it but most of the Executive Board are Honiton councillors and won’t countenance any radical costcutting or closure that might cost them votes.

Oh, and the EDBF Task and Finish Forum stays in the long, long grass!

Source: http://new.eastdevon.gov.uk/media/476265/131114-os-agenda-combined.pdf

“Clean, green, seen” – EDDC manages to be hypocritical about all three promises when dealing with disgraced ex-Councillor Graham Brown

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/intention-Graham-Brown-application-heard-public/story-24110642-detail/story.html

What did you expect?

Seaton hotel site: Mc Carthy & Stone apply for retirement flats

Visiting the envisaged Jurassic Coast Visitor Centre in Seaton will not be able to stay in the planned adjacent hotel as Tesco has agreed to sell that part of the site to McCarthy and Stone  (who have put in an application for 42 retirement flats), if their planning application is successful.

The site was originally supposed to have a hotel, leisure facilities and 300 plus general and affordable houses.  The affordable percentage was originally set at 40% but was later reduced to 25% and then to zero percent.

Along with the Tesco store the site will now have only general and retirement housing, no affordable housing, no leisure facilities and no hotel.

Where is Ware Farm decision?

EDDC website says deadline was 28 October, 2014,  for decision on CERTIFICATE OF LAWFULNESS 14/2032/CPE.

No news so far as to whether this case, with its  unusual circumstances, has been or will be decided in or out of the public eye.

The following links give some background

http://eastdevonalliance.org/2014/09/22/town-council-finds-apparent-inconsistencies-and-contradictions-in-brown-application/

http://eastdevonalliance.org/2014/09/22/ex-councillor-browns-facts-disputed-2/

http://eastdevonalliance.org/2014/09/23/farmer-brown-or-mr-brown-the-saga-continues/

http://eastdevonalliance.org/2014/09/12/daisy-the-cow/

 

 

Hugo Swire – behind the times yet again

Hugo Swire has just – after seven years – commented on the local plan! And what he says shows that he is – yet again – behind the times in his own constituency. Here is what he says – with annotations:

Unlike some, I have never taken the rather irresponsible position of being anti-development.

This is absolutely true as Hugo has never, in fact, taken any position at all on the local plan during its long history.

The fact is that for decades there has been a chronic shortage of homes, not least due to a growing and aging population. It is absolutely vital that we build more affordable houses, especially for young people in East Devon trying to get on the housing ladder.

We totally agree – but, unfortunately for Hugo, East Devon District Council does NOT agree. Large, cash-rich developers have been allowed to strike out ALL affordable housing in their developments, citing their poverty!

‘However, we must ensure that a balance is struck. We live and work in a wonderful part of the world and it is absolutely crucial that East Devon retains its beautiful landscape and unique character.

Well, here is one thing we can agree on. But it comes a little too late in Hugo’s case. Whilst we – and many others – have been banging this drum for years and years Hugo has been noticeable by his silence.

A completed Local Plan is essential as it would be drawn up in consultation with local people so that they could determine where development should and should not go. However, many of my constituents feel that EDDC’s lack of a Local Plan is allowing developers free rein which is leading to overdevelopment in areas such as Woodbury Salterton.

Now, is it just a coincidence that his constituency office is in Woodbury Salterton? He makes no mention of of Newton Poppleford or Budleigh Salterton and all the other towns and villages in his constituency beset by inappriopriate planning applications due to our lack of a local plan. And his biggest blooper – saying that the local plan “should be drawn up in consultation with local people so that they could determine where development should and should not go” – which reveals his total ignorance of the fact that local people commented in their THOUSANDS before the last iteration of the draft Local Plan and made it TOTALLY clear where they thought development was appropriate and how much there should be. EDDC rode roughshod over these views. Local people – East Devon Alliance in particular – pointed out the weaknesses of the draft local plan – no up-to-date figures, no strong evidence for development sites, the stupidity of relying on a group of local landowners to decide where employment land should be sited – and all was ignored. All these points were picked up by the Planning Inspector who threw the plan out.

‘Today I call on EDDC to make the completion of its Local Plan an absolute priority and, in the meantime, ensure that the green light is not automatically given to developers. Inappropriate planning applications must always be rejected’.

Oh, Hugo, so little, so late! But we guess we should feel privileged that, this close to an election, you are slowly, very slowly coming round to the point of view that most of us have had all along!

Cranbrook grows and grows and grows and needs more and more and more EDDC staff – but not everyone there is happy

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Challenge-East-Devon-Council-Cranbrook-grows/story-24058013-detail/story.html

Which makes it all the more strange that the EDDC Economic Development Officer – who had formerly spent so much time administering the meetings of the East Devon Business Forum – was allowed to leave … still, that’s at least one salary that can be put to good use. Though, of course, we cannot have another Economic Development Manager for the next two years if he was made redundant.

What an odd situation. Just at the time when you need someone doing Economic Development, the post disappears.

And it seems as if they really do need all hands on deck if the following reader’s letter on the Express and Echo website is to be believed:

CRANBROOK should conjure up the urban dream nestled in the countryside; certainly the offices of the builders, with their impressive flower displays, manicured grass, trees, and shrubs, lure prospective buys on into a place where there is no infrastruture, no green spaces, and cramped housing conditions.

The reality of the place is like most things of today, all show and no heart.  It is a place for the young and inexperienced, with lots of children and dogs for company.  Most of them don’t live there, they go to work early and return late, lucky them. As more building continues, I think we can call it Cramped Cranbrook.

Name and address withheld
http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Reader-8217-s-Letter-Cranbrook-urban-dream/story-24101052-detail/story.html