Mid Devon senior officers appear to write policy without involving portfolio holder

“SENIOR managers rewrote a report that controversially called for a 50 percent cut in funding to the Grand Western Canal, without his input, the portfolio holder responsible for grants to community organisations has said.

Mid Devon District Council’s community well-being policy group met this afternoon to discuss plans to reduce the council’s support for the attraction from £45,000 to £22,500 next year and withdrawing financial support completely in the following year.

Supporters of the canal spoke at the meeting to express their concerns at the impact such a dramatic cut in funding would have.

Adam Pilgrim, who was a member of the Canal Awareness Group which ceased to exist earlier this year, told assembled councillors: “You would be doing the community a great disservice if you implement the recommendation.”

Cllr Slade said: “Last year I was involved in the decision-making process and I suggested concern about a few elements and some of the suggested changes were made, but I wasn’t involved this year and by the time I raised concerns, the document was in the public domain. …

… He claimed the document was rewritten by the council’s senior management and he could not make a recommendation to cabinet to support the current proposals. “I have serious reservations about the cuts, including to the Grand Western Canal,” he said.

Cllr Bob Deed, who formerly held the same cabinet post, and said he had some experience of the challenge of making reductions to the funding of worthy causes, said: “I am absolutely disgusted with the fact the cabinet member has not had any opportunity to be involved in the discussion of this paper. It’s autocratic.”

http://www.middevongazette.co.uk/Cuts-grants-hold-cabinet-member-says-won-t-wield/story-28107956-detail/story.html

Moving and Improving questionnaire needs – improving!

The preamble to this survey includes:

“We sent out paper copies of our Moving and Improving questionnaire to 3,000 randomly selected households in the post. To make sure this stays as a random sample, everyone else has to complete this copy of the questionnaire. They both have the same questions.”

The implication of this statement is that the replies from the 3000 households will be analysed separately from the self-motivated respondents to the online survey.

Is this true? If so, will the results of both versions be published?

A correspondent also writes:

“I commented in my response to Q3 – for what reason might I visit the Honiton or Exmouth offices? – to the effect that I noted that “To attend a Council meeting” was not included in the list of boxes to tick.

I surmised that they hoped no-one would bother,”

Exmouth: EDDC changes its mind about rugby club supermarket site

“East Devon District Council (EDDC) has viewed a store on the site in Royal Avenue as a priority since publishing its Exmouth Masterplan in 2011.

However, the latest draft of EDDC’s Local Plan deletes references to the store, and says a new or refreshed Masterplan will be drawn up.

Exmouth’s mayor has welcomed the rethink, but the chairman of the town’s chamber of commerce says a new large food store is still required, even if a proposed Marks and Spencer store, also in Royal Avenue, is built, as this would not be enough to meet the town’s needs.

When asked about the council’s policy shift, an EDDC spokesman said: “As a council, we need to be adaptable in our approach to our Masterplan and refresh our proposals when we need to.

“For example, we all agree that a large supermarket development on the estuary side is a challenge, so we need to take a look at the location and other town centre sites.”

Stuart Hughes’s “Pothole Army” fails to march

“An “army” of people to fill potholes on Devon roads promised last year has been thwarted by legal paperwork and insurance delays.

Last October Devon County Council asked volunteers to help repair the roads to help save money.

Fifty five people applied to become Community Road Wardens but no work has been yet been undertaken.

The council said the scheme was “innovative” and it was taking time to get everything in place.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-34705939

Bye bye countryside, bye bye localism, hello urban sprawl

“Tens of thousands of new homes in greenfield areas in England will be given automatic planning permission amid fears that communities will have inappropriate developments forced on them.

Ministers have quietly given developers the right to be granted “planning in principle” in areas that are earmarked for new housing schemes.

Rural campaigners said the new powers will restrict the rights of council planning officers to ensure that the design, density, size and location of homes is in keeping with local areas.

Shaun Spiers, chief executive of the Campaign to protect Rural England, said: ““The country needs more house building, but the way to achieve this is through well-planned developments that win public consent. Imposing development without local democratic oversight is a recipe for discord. …”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/greenpolitics/planning/11968830/Tens-of-thousands-of-new-homes-in-greenfield-areas-to-get-automatic-planning-permission.html