Owl is having difficulty understanding why the Deputy Leader (Conservative) of Devon County Council is moaning about cuts in public services, since austerity was the platform he chose to stand on when he asked for public votes at a recent election.
What did he think was going to happen?
Those who didn’t vote for his party (the majority of voters in the country and in Devon (first past the post creates this) knew pretty much how things were going to pan out and are angry but not as surprised as Mr Clatworthy!
Here is his view:
“The funding of rural counties over urban areas has been condemned as unfair by the deputy leader of Devon County Council.
John Clatworthy, who is also the cabinet member for finance, said Devon’s budget would have been very different if the county was funded at the national average.
He said the government had recognised the disparity between rural and urban funding and granted Devon an extra £8.4m – the fourth highest in the country.
But overall Devon’s residents were still suffering from historic under-funding.
“I did not come into local government to see fewer resources to support our communities,” he said.
“On the contrary, we need the right level of financial support. Devon does not receive average funding and there is a clear disparity between urban and rural funding.”
Mr Clatworthy said, on average, rural areas received £130 per person less Government funding than urban areas.
Devon’s schools got £287 less per pupil than the national average. If Devon received the average it would mean an extra £25m for the county’s schools, he said.
In Public Health, Devon got £38 per person compared with an national average of £69 whilst the City of London received £200 per person. If Devon received the average it would mean an additional £22.4m.
When it comes to transport infrastructure, for every £100 spent in the South East we receive £7.50 in the South West,” said Mr Clatworthy.
“Because we are receiving less than the average funding, many authorities must be receiving well above the average.
“That cannot be right or equitable and needs to be addressed because the cuts are felt harder on authorities with less than average funding.”
Mr Clatworthy said that the Government’s austerity agenda meant that between 2010 and 2019, almost £250m would have been removed from Devon’s budget.
But, for 2016/17, the county council would still be spending £443.5m on services. After allowing for inflation and other spending pressures, that represented savings of £34.3m on the current year.
In spite of this, there would be an increase of £11.3m in the budget for children and £5m in the budget for adult care.
Mr Clatworthy said the council had decided to accept the Government’s offer of a two per cent increase in council tax to help fund adult social care.
The increase in the living wage would cost Devon over £7 million and the two per cent rise would bring in £6.5m.
“With reduced Government support, we need to have sufficient funds to deliver all our services so, reluctantly, we are having to add 1.99 per cent to the two per cent making a 3.99 per cent increase this year.
“This additional funding will give certainty of income which is essential to protect services.”
http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Devon-s-historic-underfunding-highlighted-council/story-28769419-detail/story.html
East Devon Watch 
This is a perfect example of why National Party politics has no relevance to, and should play no part in, local government.
Because central government now dictates so much of what happens in local government, what was needed at the last election was a county council who would act as a check-and-balance against central government – indeed in the EDDC elections last May, many local residents recognised that and voted for Independent candidates (of various flavours).
Fortunately, Devon County Council’s Tory leadership ave now recognised that their toadying to the central party was a disaster and they are now turned about face and are campaigning against the austerity cuts. Unfortunately, this has come somewhat too late to make any difference – the dastardly deed has been done by the central Tory Party and there is nothing that the local Tory Party can do about it.
I hope that the electorate remember this when the next local elections come around and see the wisdom of voting Independent.
LikeLike
Tories thought that “austerity” and cuts didn’t apply to them. They are happy for others to do without social services, hospitals, school places etc, but unhappy if it suddenly turns out its they who will lose out. See also how Oxfordshire are so upset they are losing 37% of their budget. They don’t care that Liverpool lost 58%.
LikeLike