BBC castigated for poor coverage of non-mainstream parties and independents

Extract from letter to BBC:

… “It is deeply insulting that parties such as the Monster Raving Loony Party have been given television interviews instead. Even the Abolish Assembly party which is not constructive have been offered the opportunity.

We know that unfair coverage of this kind and the deliberate exclusion of Independent Candidates has a negative impact on the debate and adversely influence the actual election. It is essential for the sake of democracy that all candidates have the opportunity to appear at all hustings and in the media.” …

http://www.local.gov.uk/documents/330211/1064611/Letter+to+Ric+Bailey/aacc9676-04a2-4c6b-9888-67e10e4e5ae1

A long but fascinating (and chilling) article about how the Conservative Party set about winning the general election:

http://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2015/06/the-computers-that-crashed-and-the-campaign-that-didnt-the-story-of-the-tory-stealth-operation-that-outwitted-labour.html

Just a few areas (and farmers) unhappy about devolution deals

This is by jo means an exhaustive list – just a random few picked out from mebdia this week only:

North East
http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/decision-over-north-east-devolution-11331708

Hampshire
http://www.themj.co.uk/Hampshire-divided-over-devolution-deals/204042

East Anglia:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-36285239

Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire
http://www.machinery-market.co.uk/news/13904/Nottinghamshire-and-Derbyshire-risk-losing-out

Wourcestershire
http://www.malverngazette.co.uk/news/14484626.Worcestershire_may_have_to_re_think_devolution_deal__says_council_leader/

South Cambridgeshire
http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/South-Cambs-leader-Ray-Manning-stand-blasts-City/story-29257354-detail/story.html

Farmers
http://www.farminguk.com/News/Lack-of-devolution-deal-co-ordination-puts-rural-growth-opportunity-at-risk-says-CLA_39669.html

Latest news on Hinkley C

and none of it good:

Hinkley

You need an urban income to survive in rural areas

“Living the good life can seriously damage your wealth. Research suggests that anyone aspiring to live in the countryside, but wanting to climb the earnings ladder, should do so only after a lengthy spell of urban dwelling.

The first analysis of its kind, published by the British Sociological Association in the journal Work, Employment and Society, has found that people who grow up in rural areas earn less than their urban equivalents even after they move to cities for work.

Martin Culliney, of Sheffield Hallam University, tracked the income of 1,594 people aged 15-24 over a near 20-year period. He found that in 2008-09, net take-home pay for those living in rural areas was about £900 a year less than for those living in towns and cities.

AdvertisementHide
The best paid were those who had started off in a town or city and then moved to a rural area. Net take-home pay for those working full-time was about £23,400 a year. Those who stayed in rural areas or moved from rural to urban areas had the lowest net take-home pay, about £14,400 to £18,400 a year for full-time workers.

“Young people who remain in rural locations earn less money than their urban peers,” said Culliney. This is perhaps unsurprising. Rural areas offer fewer jobs and a limited range of careers. But the fact the gap persists even among those country dwellers prepared to move was concerning, he said. “Simply being of rural origin brought respondents less pay across the whole 18-year observation window,” said Culliney, who warned that the findings could be interpreted by young people as “conveying a rather fatalistic message” – that they will suffer a “pay penalty into adulthood”, even if they relocate to towns and cities.

The economic plight of young people in rural areas is in marked contrast with older countryside dwellers, who tend to earn more.

The research suggests that the countryside risks becoming unaffordable to younger generations. “If young people remaining in rural areas face greater living costs while their earnings increase at a slower pace than other groups, what can be done to ensure that they do not suffer?” Culliney asked. “Less disposable income in rural locations surely acts to the detriment of local services such as shops and pubs, which also perform important social functions in the communities they serve.”

http://gu.com/p/4j7np

Another U-turn: Government now begging people to register to vote!

After totally ignoring those who pointed out that too few people were registering to vote at the last election after electoral registration rules changed (particularly here in East Devon where our Electoral Officer “lost” around 6,000 voters from the electoral roll) David Cameron is now begging people to register to vote in the EU referendum:

Twenty-eight million UK households will be targeted this week in a mass campaign to encourage people to vote in the EU referendum, after David Cameron warned of “terrible” economic consequences if the country votes for Brexit.

http://gu.com/p/4j82v

At the time of the General Election, many political pundits pointed out that those who did not register were thought to be most likely to be Labour supporters and speculated that this was the reason a major campaign had not been organised by the Government.

Now that the EU referendum appears so close, the government has done yet another u-turn and started this drive to urge registration!

Bet they are now rather annoyed that they didn’t give the vote to 16-18 year olds, most of whom are said to favour remaining in the EU. But, at the time, the reason given was that they were not politically sophisticated enough!