“An ethical crisis in British capitalism”

“It is pointless to deny now that there is an ethical crisis in British capitalism. The issue is not just the primacy of cash extraction over investment. There is a deeper malaise that has blurred the distinction between enterprise and racketeering.

When Ed Miliband drew that line in a speech in 2011 he found himself in the press pillory reserved for politicians of the left whose rhetoric is insufficiently deferential to business. But Mr Miliband was on to something and, slowly, ever greater numbers of Conservatives are drawing the same conclusions. Tory MPs are prominent in the charge to see Sir Philip stripped of his knighthood. There is a recognition on the right that rising anti-corporate sentiment cannot be written off as an envious leftwing ideological tantrum. It expresses justified outrage at a system that allows rich and powerful individuals to wreak social and economic havoc with impunity.

With breathtaking cynicism, hardline Eurosceptics even try to steer this sentiment against Britain’s EU membership, denouncing Brussels as a corporate conspiracy. In truth, workers and consumers need protections agreed at a European level to prevent cross-border competitive junking of rights leading to more rampant exploitation – Brexit’s real destination.

The new Tory critique of rapacious capitalism points towards the potential for a new consensus. It might encourage business leaders to discover that their self-interest lies in a more enlightened approach to workers’ rights and acceptance of wider social responsibilities. Most businesses would welcome such a shift and most politicians would gladly facilitate one. The idea that all capitalism is cruel and that private profit is all theft from the public is confined to the left-most fringe. Likewise, only a handful of ultras on the right now believe that all regulation is a suffocation of economic freedom.

A workable solution to the challenge posed by cases such as BHS, Boots and Sports Direct can come about only through a partnership of business and politics. The full force of existing laws must be applied, and the bully pulpit of the Commons should be used to greater effect. But that is just a prelude to a cultural change, whereby the spirit of enterprise might more plausibly be invoked as a force for progress. Too often now it is a cover for something much darker.”

http://gu.com/p/4yv5p

Blot on the landscape: Knowle retirement megalith

See link below for before and after pictures.

Residents on higher floors had better hope their lift never breaks down!

Pegasus Life planning application for Knowle. Deadline for YOUR comments this Wednesday 15 JUNE

“Housing crisis giving capitalism a bad name”

“… In the early 1990’s, low and middle-income workers needed to save 5% of their wages for three years to build a deposit for a first-time property. Today they need 24 years of such savings. …

… Survey evidence suggests over half of first-time buyers in 2015 had to rely on financial assistance from their parents, rising to two-thirds in London and the South-East. The UK housing market is giving capitalism a bad name. We are no longer a progressive, meitocratic society”. ...

Liam Halligan, today’s Sunday Telegraph, article: “No amount of EU hysteria can bury our housing crisis”, page 4, Business section

Devolution: the ultimate powers of a unitary mayor

Given that Hinkley C is the primary focus of our devolution deal, it would be almost certain that a Somerset-centric Mayor would be elected.

Where they exist, the elected mayor will chair the combined authority, and will appoint the combined authority’s ‘members’ (the leaders of the participating local councils) to portfolios in their ‘cabinet’.

The members will be able to overrule the mayor by a two-thirds majority on certain matters, such as the budget and mayoral strategies. On other matters, such as spatial plans, unanimity will be required.

http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CDP-2016-0122/CDP-2016-0122

Spatial plans = housing, commercial and industrial development in the whole of Devon and Somerset in the hands of one person unless every other cabinet member disagrees.

Thus, the Mayor only needs to have a close understanding with one person within the Cabinet to make the whole of the rest of the Cabinet impotent on decisions about development – and, on other matters, the Mayor only has to carry one-third plus one with him or her to overrule the remaining two- thirds minus one.

Modern democracy!

Warrington doesn’t like the idea of devolution either

” … An imminent agreement between ministers and council chiefs is now highly unlikely but Warrington North MP Helen Jones said the Labour group made the ‘right decision’ for the town.

She added: “The Tories are trying to force us into an alliance with councils with whom we have little community of interest.

“Warrington spent a long time trying to get out of Cheshire to run its own affairs, now there are attempts to force us back in.

… If anyone really believes that this is not a prelude to future local government reorganisation, they are in cloud cuckoo land.

“This deal offered us very little and almost nothing for my constituency. In fact, some parts of it would transfer money from Warrington to elsewhere in Cheshire.

“I am glad that the Labour group wants to explore other options. If the Government was really serious about devolution it would offer it to recognised communities like Warrington instead of trying to force us into a one size fits all formula.”

http://www.warringtonguardian.co.uk/news/14549677

Academy schools and the potential for corruption

” … in a meeting between union officials and Blue Support executives shortly after the letter arrived [about the award of a cleaning contract for an academy school], a diligent, if overworked, Unison official admitted to being puzzled. Sitting with her back to the window in one of the new-build school’s soulless rooms, Hazel Corby wondered why the lucky company had the same Stockport address as Bright Tribe’s headquarters. She asked how the company had been so swiftly selected after Bright Tribe’s takeover? Who else had a chance to bid for the contract?

‘Joining a multi-academy trust is like marriage without divorce’

The school’s principal didn’t know. An answer wasn’t forthcoming from those representing the company that afternoon, or in the days to come. Bright Tribe later said the question was irrelevant as the contract with Blue Support was made on an interim basis.

But an exchange of business cards between Corby and Blue Support’s human resources manager, Sally Jarvis, gave rather more away. “Sally’s card said Equity Solutions on it,” said Corby.

ES Management Services – where the ES stands for Equity Solutions – is the parent company of Blue Support, of which Dwan’s brother, Andrew, is managing director. Equity Solutions is also Mike Dwan’s main business interest, among 90 other companies of which he is, or has been, a director.

Bright Tribe insists that it has always been transparent about its commercial partners. But, for Corby, Jarvis’s business card was a loose thread that, once pulled, unravelled what she felt was a worrying complex of interconnected commercial and charitable interests.

Here was a financier who had quietly moved into sponsoring academies and with ostensibly philanthropic ambitions. Dwan’s spokesman said that he had donated £3.5m “directly or indirectly” to his academy empire, which included 11 failing schools desperately in need of his resources. The spokesman added that, while Dwan is aware “some will seek to find some ulterior motive for his actions”, he is “involved in the provision of school improvement services for a sole single purpose, to promote better outcomes for our children”.

Yet in 2013-14 alone, it was to emerge, there were nearly £1m worth of payments not recorded in the publicly available accounts by Dwan’s academies to his own private businesses. In 2014-15 another £1.9m in such payments, known as “related party transactions”, were made, albeit this time reported in publicly available accounts following pressure from government regulators.”

http://gu.com/p/4kqm2