Should LEP’s be county based? To be tested in Sheffield

“Residents of South Yorkshire will not get to vote for a mayor this summer after the high court ruled they had not been not properly consulted on whether the county could annex part of Derbyshire.

The mayoral elections are being postponed until 2018 so that the Sheffield city region (SCR) can consult the public on whether Chesterfield in Derbyshire should join the combined authority, along with Bassetlaw in Nottinghamshire.

Momentum is building behind calls for the SCR proposal to be scrapped in favour of a whole-Yorkshire deal. With more than 5 million residents, the four counties of Yorkshire have a bigger population than Scotland and a GDP double that of Wales.

Caroline Flint, the Labour MP for the Don Valley, said a Yorkshire-wide deal should be explored. “It’s disappointing that the deal has fallen through but maybe there is an opportunity to reflect on whether there is another way forward,” she said.

“Maybe there is a regional way to bring the whole of Yorkshire and the Humber together because if we were given the powers through devolution I think we could do a great job. With 5 million people it would be amazing the things we could do. There is nothing stronger than the Yorkshire brand – it’s one of the best things we have to promote our region.”

In October 2015 the Sheffield city region became the second combined authority to sign a devolution deal with the then chancellor, George Osborne, as part of his dream to build a “northern powerhouse” to rival London and the south-east.

Under the terms of the agreement, South Yorkshire was to elect its own mayor this May, along with Greater Manchester, Tees Valley, the West Midlands, the west of England and the Liverpool city region.

The former sports minister Richard Caborn and the Barnsley council leader, Stephen Houghton, had been expected to contest the Labour nomination for South Yorkshire mayor.

After the SCR officially postponed the mayoral elections on Thursday, Ros Jones, the mayor of Doncaster, and Houghton issued a joint statement saying they owed it to residents to “work with colleagues to explore this new Yorkshire-wide option, to ensure we give all potential devolution solutions proper consideration so that residents can be fully informed when being asked to participate in consultation over the summer months”.

Conservative MPs and councillors in Yorkshire have long favoured a whole-Yorkshire deal, reasoning that their party would then have a better shot at winning a mayoral election. The idea has been strongly resisted, particularly by Labour leaders in West Yorkshire, who caused David Cameron to once remark: “We just thought people in Yorkshire hated everyone else; we didn’t realise they hated each other so much.”

In September last year the five Labour leaders of West Yorkshire’s councils – Leeds, Bradford, Wakefield, Calderdale and Kirklees – reluctantly agreed to follow Greater Manchester’s lead and accept the imposition of an elected mayor in return for more power. Their proposed Leeds city region would have included cooperation with York, Selby, Craven and Harrogate in North Yorkshire.

But the deal was stymied by Tories including Kevin Hollinrake, the MP for Thirsk and Malton, who told the Guardian last year that when he was councillor he had lobbied Osborne and the then local government minister, Greg Clark, to reject the West Yorkshire deal. He denied his objections were politically motivated, saying he thought the proposed geography was “very counterproductive and ill-thought-out” and would put his rural constituency at a disadvantage.

“The reason I was concerned is that the West Yorkshire deal encompassed York and Harrogate, and as a representative for a rural North Yorkshire seat it would cause significant problems to have the key towns and city within our economy included and us left outside,” he said.

Hollinrake and other Conservatives prefer the idea of a Greater Yorkshire devolution deal. “It’s in the economic best interests of my region. This isn’t political. According to our calculations, if there were a mayor of Greater Yorkshire it’s very evenly balanced as to whether they are Labour or Conservative or indeed independent,” he said.

He said he thought Alan Johnson, the Labour MP for Kingston upon Hull West and Hessle, or William Hague, the Conservative former foreign secretary who represented Richmond in North Yorkshire for 26 years until 2015, could do a good job as mayor.”

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jan/12/sheffield-mayoral-vote-delay-prompts-calls-for-yorkshire-wide-deal?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Penzance shows how to deal with an NHS sham consultation!

“Unlike at Bude the previous day, where a smaller – and significantly more elderly – crowd had divided obediently into small workshops to consider the relative merits of differing aspects of the health and social care system, the Penzance meeting was an altogether more rowdy affair. People had come to the meeting not to hear what they already knew, but to say what they thought about it.”

http://cornwallreports.co.uk/?page_id=4861

“Philip Hammond took stake in company shortly before it received government grant”

“The Chancellor of the Exchequer Philip Hammond took a stake in a food technology business shortly before it received a government grant to develop low fat ready meals.

According to records at Companies House, Mr Hammond took a stake of 15 per cent in Hydramach, a food tech company based in Cambridgeshire, in October 2015 when he was still Foreign Secretary. In April 2016, the company received a share of a £560,000 grant from Innovate UK, a tech start up agency of the then Business department.

The Daily Telegraph reported that the grant was to develop low fat and low sugar soups, ready meals and sauces. Mr Hammond was appointed Chancellor by new Prime Minister Theresa May in July. …”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/philip-hammond-took-stake-in-company-shortly-before-it-received-government-grant-a7523381.html

That was a lucky guess wasn’t it! Of all the shares in all the world, he had to choose that one …

And now it’s Barratt’s turn to post bad news

“Barratt said it built 7,180 homes in the six months to December 31, down 6% on the same period a year earlier reflecting a fall in completions in the capital.

A slowdown in London’s property market since the Brexit vote has seen Barratt Developments PLC (LON:BDEV) report a year-on-year drop in the number of homes it built in its first half.

Britain’s biggest housebuilder by volume said it built 7,180 homes in the six months to December 31, down 6% on the same period a year earlier reflecting a fall in completions in the capital.

The FTSE 100-listed firm’s disappointing update comes a fortnight after its FTSE 250-listed peer Bovis Homes PLC (LON:BVS) said that its new house sales this year will be lower than expected due to completions in December falling short.”

http://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/171527/london-market-slow-down-sees-barratt-developments-post-drop-in-the-number-of-homes-built-171527.html

“More Hovis than Bovis”

“Like a loaf of bread, the house bullder Bovis is a bit crumbly. Its chief executive has just departed, in advance of some poor financial results. One of the company’s problems seems to be that it can’t build the houses it promised to build.

At the end of last year Bovis issued a profits warning. It stated: “We have experienced slower-than-expected build production across the group’s sites during December, resulting in approximately 180 largely built and sold private homes that were expected to complete in 2016 being deferred into early 2017”[1].

One story not covered in the company’s media releases featured heavily in The Times this morning, and also in the Guardian [2]. This is that Bovis was paying purchasers cash of between £2000 and £3000 to complete the purchase of new homes even though the houses were not ready. Some 650 people are members of the Bovis Homes Victims Group [3] set up on Facebook to share their depressing experiences.

One lesson to be drawn from this story is that reliance on the volume housebuilders to deliver the housing we need is a fool’s errand. Despite its use of standard designs, of as low a density and as a high a price as they can get away with, Bovis hasn’t met its own targets. Moreover, all large housebuilders shy away from building on brownfield – previously developed – land because it costs more to build there than on green fields. And so we get urban sprawl and loss of productive farming land or greenspace for us to enjoy. Meanwhile the government blames local authorities and the planning system for delays, while turning a blind eye to the failings among its own corporate supporters.

At the same time, small and medium-sized housebuilders are having difficulty finding land on which to build homes, as a recent report from the Federation of Master Builders and the Local Government Information Unit showed [4]. The report did aim criticism at local authorities for concentrating on large developments when drawing up local plans, a charge that is certainly true in some areas. This bias against small firms also hinders the development of housing co-operatives which design the housing their members want rather than what the housebuilders tell them they can have.

NOTES

[1] Bovis Homes Group plc press release 28 December 2016 at http://www.bovishomesgroup.co.uk/media-centre/press-releases/press-release-173/pre-close-update/

[2] Guardian story at https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/jan/11/bovis-accused-of-pressurising-buyers-to-move-into-unfinished-homes The Times is behind a paywall.

[3] https://www.facebook.com/groups/BovisVictimsGroup/

[4] http://www.fmb.org.uk/about-the-fmb/policy-and-public-affairs/new-fmb-research/”

Source: https://petercleasby.com/2017/01/11/more-hovis-than-bovis/

Where to get the news first?

10 January 2017
Owl reports on website that Honiton Town Council standards High Court decision:

https://eastdevonwatch.org/2017/01/10/high-court-confirms-that-decisions-under-delegated-authority-to-grant-planning-permission-require-reasons/

12 January 2017:
Sidmouth Herald reports website that Honiton Town Council standards case High Court decision:

http://www.midweekherald.co.uk/news/high_court_rules_that_honiton_town_council_acted_unlawfully_1_4843762

Stay ahead with East Devon Watch!