PM orders Army to plan for four-way winter disaster of coronavirus, Brexit, flu and flooding

Boris Johnson has ordered the army to plan for a potential quadruple crisis this winter involving a second spike of coronavirus, a serious flu outbreak, Brexit and flooding, it has emerged.

By Jane Merrick July 22, 2020 inews.co.uk 

Army, councils and Whitehall all given August deadline for new contingency plan, as ministers try not to be caught out

 

The head of the Ministry of Defence’s strategy and operations revealed that Downing Street has asked for tabletop exercises, simulating a combination of emergencies, to be carried out by army chiefs, Whitehall departments and local authorities by the end of August in order to prepare for the possible winter disaster.

The revelation underscores the strenuous efforts going on behind the scenes in Whitehall and in civil resilience forums across the country to prepare the UK for a second peak of Covid-19 infections and prevent the NHS from being overwhelmed.

The i politics newsletter cut through the noise

It is in stark contrast to the Prime Minister’s public comments at his Downing Street press conference last week, in which he said it was possible the country could get back to normality by Christmas.

While local authorities have been given new powers to isolate sporadic outbreaks of Covid-19 and avoid a second nationwide peak in infections, the tabletop exercises involve planning for a reemergence of the disease across the country, together with the normal winter flu season which puts a strain on the NHS, the end of the transition period for Brexit on 31 December, which could lead to food shortages and queues at ports if there is no trade deal in place, as well as serious flooding.

Devastating floods hit the UK last winter, as well as in 2015/16 and 2013/14, and six of the 10 wettest years on record have taken place in the last 20 years.

Worst case scenarios

In evidence to the House of Lords public services committee, which is conducting an inquiry into lessons to be learned from the pandemic, Lieutenant General Douglas Chalmers, the head of military strategy and operations at the MoD, said the army was working with the new Joint Biosecurity Centre and Whitehall chiefs on planning for the worst case scenarios.

He said: “The [Covid-19] crisis is still very firmly with us, and definitely as we look towards the winter now, we know about the normal flu season … we’re obviously transitioning out of the EU, and we have our normal floods etc that come on.

“So we are looking at very heavily at how we do winter preparedness and we will support, because we run tabletop [TT] exercises very routinely, we will support some of the departmental tabletop exercising… in Whitehall and local resilience forums.

“No10 has been very clear those TT exercises need to be done by the end of August in order that we can learn from them and then act on some of those elements that have been brought forward.”

Lt Gen Chalmers said he hoped that the civil servants involved in those exercises would be kept in place for the winter because it was essential to “sustain the neural network”.

‘Terrible health outcomes’

In his evidence to the committee, former head of the Civil Service and Cabinet Secretary Lord Gus O’Donnell criticised the Government’s response to the pandemic, saying that there had been plenty of data but not enough analysis of that data.

He told peers: “I don’t think anyone can hide away from the fact that our health outcomes are terrible compared to the rest of the world. Part of the problem has been that we haven’t got the right people around the table at the right time.

“The Cabinet Office is very large compared to my day – if people think throwing people at this is the answer, then that clearly hasn’t worked.”

Lord O’Donnell said he was “really worried” that when the key decisions were made by ministers and scientists at Cobra “they only had half the story”. Ministers had a “fundamental problem” in that they “got the science but didn’t get the social science” and that the government introduced “one of the biggest changes to behaviour ever been brought about” in the lockdown without really understanding behavioural science, the crossbench peer said.

He said there was also a lack of “clear messages – if anyone knows what the clear message on masks is, please tell me”.

Lord O’Donnell added: “All those [Downing Street] press briefings with deaths in hospitals, they biased the whole thing towards hospitals, not care homes.”

Quadruple threat — The four potential crisis points

  1. Second wave of Covid-19. The worst case scenario is that infections reach epidemic levels again across the country, putting serious strain on the NHS.
  2. Serious winter flu outbreak. Each winter hospitals experience their busiest period because of flu, despite a nationwide vaccine programme. Flu kills around 8,000 people in the UK each year, but there were more serious flu seasons in the winters of 2010-11 and 2017-18.
  3. Brexit. If no trade deal with the EU is in place by New Year’s Day, there could be food shortages, panic buying and queues at ports for goods coming into the UK.
  4. Floods. Devastating floods hit the UK last winter, as well as in 2015-16 and 2013-14, and six of the 10 wettest years on record have occurred in the past 20 years. Last winter the military was brought in to help evacuate people from deluged homes and deliver food to stranded households, and at least 11 people died.

The committee also heard from Tracy Daszkiewicz, who was head of public health for Wiltshire during the Salisbury poisonings and was portrayed in the recent BBC drama on that crisis.

Ms Daszkiewicz, who is now deputy director of population health and wellbeing at Public Health England, told peers that she and her colleagues believed the novichok attack in 2018 would be the “biggest [crisis] of our career” adding: “Little did we know what 2020 had in store.”

Local Tories channel Trump in attempt to bamboozle over cuts to Devon’s NHS

A rather Trumpist email (sent to me by a concerned resident) appears to be a stock response being circulated to people contacting their conservative councillors about the service cuts being made to the NHS in Devon, as part of a government instruction to save over £400m by 2024.

claire-wright.org 

Local Tories channel Trump in attempt to bamboozle over cuts to Devon’s NHS

A rather Trumpist email (sent to me by a concerned resident) appears to be a stock response being circulated to people contacting their conservative councillors about the service cuts being made to the NHS in Devon, as part of a government instruction to save over £400m by 2024.

The annual budget is £2.6bn.

It comes after a previous attempt to make significant savings to Devon’s NHS failed, partly because the government forced a £30bn ‘efficiency savings’ programme on the NHS nationally and reduced the annual increment from around six per cent in 2010, to around one per cent during the past decade.

The email from conservative councillors to concerned residents appears to be both an attempt to confound residents and at the same time disparage me.

The situation has arisen following a meeting of Devon County Council’s Health and Adult Care Scrutiny Committee on 12 March, where councillors received a presentation from Philippa Slinger, chief executive of Devon Together, on the county’s NHS’s precarious financial position and what measures were being taken to reduce spending, in order to break even by 2024.

I made a proposal at the meeting to suspend this requirement during the Covid19 pandemic to make these cuts, which was met with derision by conservative councillors.  Mrs Slinger herself also claimed there were no cuts proposed.

I replied that this was semantics and that most people would regard the list below as evidence of cuts.

My proposal was seconded by Martin Shaw but received no other backers, so it was lost. Instead, a proposal from the chair to bring the subject back to a later meeting, was supported.

At the meeting, Mrs Slinger made the following points in relation to what work (cuts!) needed to be done to get Devon’s NHS back on financial track:

  • A reduction in agency staff
  • More efficiency relating to the number of surgical procedures
  • Reducing hospital lengths of stay
  • Fewer admissions
  • Reducing overnight stays after surgery
  • Capping referrals
  • Trying to source less expensive pharmaceuticals
  • Reducing the cost of procurement, such as replacement hips
  • Reducing the number of outpatient appointments by between 60 and 70 per cent
  • Doing less work in the independent sector
  • Reducing overseas recruitment
  • Improving staff retention
  • E-consultations in primary care (GP surgeries)

The presentation in the agenda papers also outlines the broad areas for action as the following:

  • Address the challenges of increasing demand of hospital beds
  • Transforming out of hospital care and integrating community services
  • Reducing outpatient appointments by 30 per cent
  • Consideration of creation of a major diagnostic centre in Devon
  • Travelling further for planned care, such as a hip operation
  • Widening access to online GP consultations
  • New technology monitoring equipment supporting people to live independently in their own homes
  • Support more people in their home and community and avoid urgent admissions to hospital
  • Improving cancer outcomes
  • Improving mental health services through a ring-fenced investment fund
  • Shorter waits for planned care through protected capacity (capping referrals)
  • Reducing health inequalities
  • Setting minimum requirements for community based care to reduce pressure on emergency hospital services

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Here’s the email:

Dear

The CCG did not put forward any proposals to cut their budget by £400 million. The total NHS Budget in Devon is £2 billion. However, as made clear in their Committee documents, they are currently forecast to overspend that Budget by approximately £100 million a year if they take no action. What the CCG outlined to the Committee were indicative measures to try to contain that overspend and balance their books. That is totally different from cutting your budget by £400 million – THEY ARE NOT REDUCING THEIR BUDGET NOR HAVE THEY ANNOUNCED ANY PLANS TO DO SO.

 Philippa Slinger said very clearly – in plain English – at the meeting “there are not cuts.” Neither the Labour or Liberal Democrat members of the Committee supported Cllr Wright’s poorly worded and financially inaccurate and illiterate motion and if the concerns of xxxxx were true, then the Labour Party is in support of ‘£400 million of NHS cuts’ too!

 Actually the fact is, that during this pandemic the NHS and Devon County Council secured an additional 194 beds in Devon. There will be a further 120 beds in the new Nightingale Hospital, which the Government have confirmed will be used to help routine tests and scans, along with Winter Pressures this coming season and will be an enormous benefit to our NHS here in Devon. None of these improvements sound like cuts to me.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Here’s the speaker itemised webcast of the meeting. Item 7 – https://devoncc.public-i.tv/core/portal/webcast_interactive/455423/start_time/3226000

Here is the relevant agenda paper. Item 7: https://democracy.devon.gov.uk/documents/s30199/long%20term%20plan.pdf

And here’s the additional paper. Item 7: https://democracy.devon.gov.uk/documents/b12111/Long%20Term%20Plan%20Presentation%2012th-Mar-2020%2014.15%20Health%20and%20Adult%20Care%20Scrutiny%20Committee.pdf?T=9

Here’s my blog post following the meeting: https://claire-wright.org/devon-scrutiny-councillors-vote-down-proposal-to-suspend-nhs-cuts-requirement/

Test and trace failing to contact thousands in England’s worst-hit areas

The government’s flagship test-and-trace system is failing to contact thousands of people in areas with the highest infection rates in England, raising further questions about the £10bn programme described by Boris Johnson as “world-beating”.

Josh Halliday www.theguardian.com

Local leaders and directors of public health are demanding more control over the tracing operation amid concerns that their ability to contain the virus is being put at risk.

Data obtained by the Guardian shows that in areas with the highest infection rates in England, the proportion of close contacts of infected people being reached is far below 80%, the level the government’s scientific advisers say is required for test and trace to be effective.

In Luton, which has the sixth highest infection rate in England, only 47% of at-risk people were contacted by test and trace. In Leicester, which remains under a partial lockdown, the rate was 65%, meaning more than 3,300 people were not reached by the programme.

Directors of public health have expressed frustration that local expertise has been sidelined under the centralised test-and-trace system, which has been handed to private firms such as Serco and Sitel.

More than 5,500 people in four areas with the highest infection rates in England were not contacted when they should have been told to self-isolate, the Guardian has learned. These included 3,340 people in Leicester, 984 in Kirklees, 759 in Rochdale and 448 in Blackburn with Darwen.

The government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) has said that 80% of an infected person’s close contacts must be contacted and told to self-isolate within 48 to 72 hours for the national programme to be effective.

In Blackburn with Darwen the figure was 54%; in Leicester 65%, in Rochdale 66% and in Kirklees 77%.

Bradford council, which has the fourth-highest infection rate in England, declined to provide a figure but said “a high number of contacts” in the city were not traced by the national system.

A council spokeswoman said it was asking the government “to allow us to set up a local extension to the national test-and-trace system which would enable us to follow up uncontacted data with door-to-door visits, something which no national system can really do.”

Gerry Taylor, Luton borough council’s director of public health, said she was “very concerned” at the low rate in the Bedfordshire town. She said the centralised system was “too remote” to be able to reach all of its communities.

“Clearly 47% is too low. The bulk of the contact tracing feels somewhat distant from us and working more closely together with the national system I think would be a huge advantage,” she said.

Local leaders say they have the community links and relationships to hunt down the virus at street level, thereby plugging holes in the centralised system.

Factors including language barriers, distrust of unknown callers and missed emails could explain the low contact completion rate in the worst-affected towns, where in some cases the virus is disproportionately affecting people of south Asian heritage.

Under the current system, contact tracers attempt to reach close contacts of an infected person by text, email or up to 10 times by phone call.

Kate Hollern, the Labour MP for Blackburn, said the national test-and-trace system had failed. “People are out there spreading the virus unknowingly due to this government failure. The responsibility and resources for this should have been with local government, who have the local knowledge. It’s a complete shambles and we really need to get control of it.”

Lisa McNally, the director of public health at Sandwell Council in the West Midlands, which has the ninth highest infection rate in the country, said that last week only 40% of positive coronavirus cases in her area had been contacted by the national system. She said she asked the government for more data so those people could be traced locally but was told it was not possible.

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: “NHS test and trace has already helped test and isolate more than 180,000 cases – helping us control the spread of the virus, prevent a second wave and save lives. This represents 81% of close contacts identified by those who test positive.

“The service is working closely with local authorities across England to help manage local outbreaks. High quality data is critical to providing good public services and we’ve been providing increasingly detailed data to local directors of public health, helping them tackle local outbreaks and control this virus.”

10 bits of bad news that just got buried hours before the summer holiday

In the West Wing, it was nicknamed Take Out the Trash Day…..

So we’ve rummaged through Boris Johnson’s bins – metaphorically of course – to find some of the news we’re sure he wouldn’t want you to miss.

The Russia report. A pay rise for teachers. Little Prince George’s birthday photos. And, of course, coronavirus.

It’s been a busy old week in the news world – so you’d be forgiven for missing some of the other important stories that have emerged in the UK.

And it’s been made a lot busier by a simple fact – tonight is the start of MPs’ summer recess.

Call it a holiday, call it a working break, it means Parliament won’t be sitting again until September.

Every year, this day is an opportunity for the government to rush out a flurry of announcements at the last possible moment.

And every year, the government is accused of slipping out some things it hopes will be lost in the avalanche.

In the West Wing, it was nicknamed Take Out the Trash Day.

And even if it’s not a deliberate ploy, the timing means many important announcements slip below the radar.

We wouldn’t want that to happen, would we?

So we’ve rummaged through Boris Johnson’s bins – metaphorically of course – to find some of the news we’re sure he wouldn’t want you to miss.

1. Nurses face having to tighten their belts

Tory ministers announced with great fanfare this week a pay rise for 900,000 public sector workers.

But the announcement didn’t include more than a million NHS workers, including nurses and porters, as their current pay system takes them up to April 2021.

And there could be bad news when it’s their turn.

Hours after the pay rise, Chancellor Rishi Sunak launched a massive spending review to “reprioritise and deliver savings” across government.

While he claimed we won’t go back to austerity, the Chancellor warned the government will have to “exercise restraint in future” over its workers’ pay.

He added it’ll have to keep “parity” with private sector pay – which is set to stall due to coronavirus.

While spending will go up overall, Downing Street refused to rule out some individual departments having their budgets cut.

2. Tory reforms have led to ‘slum’ homes

Tory “red tape” slashing has created homes the size of Boris Johnson’s car with no windows, a damning report for the government found this week.

The scathing verdict on Tory planning reforms exposes the grim conditions forced on people in “permitted development” homes.

Tory ministers have been reforming planning rules since 2013 to extend rights to convert buildings, like office or storage units, into homes without full planning permission.

But campaigners warn the system opens the floodgates to “slums”.

The report by UCL and the University of Liverpool was commissioned by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government and slipped out just before MPs’ summer recess.

It found just 22% of permitted development homes would meet national space standards – compared to 73% through planning permission.

The smallest were just 16 square metres, and ten of them had no windows at all.

A government spokesman insisted permitted development makes an “important contribution” and is “crucial” to helping recover from coronavirus.

The government said the research “shows on average there was little difference in the appearance, energy performance or access to services between schemes delivered through permitted development and those that were granted full planning permission.”

3. Our ‘generous’ offer to Hong Kong citizens still forces them to pay for the NHS

Hours before MPs left Parliament, the government unveiled full details of its landmark visa for people from Hong Kong.

And in many ways, it’s impressive. Some 300,000 British National (Overseas) passport holders can get a special visa to live and work in the UK, eventually getting citizenship, from 2021.

Overall 3million Hong Kongers could be eligible if they get a BNO passport.

Home Secretary Priti Patel boasted the offer is “very generous” to people fleeing a mounting crackdown on free speech from the Chinese state.

Unlike the rest of the UK immigration system, there will be no skills test, no minimum income requirement, and people won’t need a UK job.

But it isn’t all roses in the small print.

Hong Kongers who come to the UK will still need to pay £624 a year to use the NHS – even if they get a job and pay taxes here like everyone else.

That’s despite the Immigration Health Surcharge being scrapped for some people, such as migrants who work in the health and social care service itself.

Ms Patel confirmed the move in a written statement – which also said BNO citizens will need to “stay of good character” and pay steep visa fees.

4. Rules on building ‘eyesore’ masts will be relaxed

5G masts have become a bit of a hot potato lately – thanks in part to conspiracy theorists who falsely claim they spread coronavirus and even set them on fire.

But sometimes opposition to phone masts is a bit simpler – for example, ruining a view for residents of a local area.

The bad news for them is the government has confirmed, hours before the summer break, that it’ll relax the rules on building or extending 5G masts.

Existing masts will be allowed to be “strengthened” without prior approval to enable them to be upgraded to the 5G network.

Radio equipment will also be allowed to be stored on sites without prior approval.

The height limit on masts will also be raised and they’ll be allowed to be placed on buildings near highways. However, these new masts will still need approval before they can be built.

5. The Tories have used coronavirus for a political ‘power grab’

The Tories have been accused of using the Coronavirus crisis to mount a ‘power grab’, after installing a longtime Boris Johnson ally to the board of Transport for London.

Andrew Gilligan, Johnson’s ‘cycling tsar’ while he was London Mayor, will be appointed as a “special representative”, according to a written statement slipped out by the government this week.

He’ll be joined by Clare Moriarty, the former top civil servant at the Brexit department.

Mr Gilligan is also an advisor to Number 10 on transport.

The pair were installed on the board as a condition of the £1.6 billion ‘bailout’ of TfL, sparked by the Coronavirus crisis.

Labour MP Wes Streeting said: “From increasing the congestion charge to scrapping free travel for young people, it is pretty obvious to Londoners that the Tories have used an unprecedented crisis to mount a power grab on TfL in the hope that the Mayor gets the blame for their decisions ahead of next year’s election.”

6. Crossrail will hit London taxpayers in the pocket

Another written statement this week threatened a big financial hit to Londoners – which could also be announced months before the mayoral election.

The vast east-west Crossrail rail project was delayed and over budget before it was even hit by coronavirus.

And in an annual update on Crossrail this week, Transport Minister Chris Heaton-Harris made it clear who will foot the bill.

He wrote: “The further schedule delays and cost increases to this project since the last annual update are very disappointing.

“A revised funding package will now need to be developed for Crossrail that is fair to UK taxpayers, with London as the primary beneficiary bearing the cost.”

Don’t be surprised if this is raised as a political issue ahead of the May 2021 mayoral election, with Tories pointing the blame at Labour mayor Sadiq Khan.

7. The Home Office has had to pay millions in legal costs

Accounts published last week show taxpayers have funded millions in legal costs when people fight the Home Office for justice.

The total bill for “special payments” in 2019/20 was £39.2m – up from £36.4m the year before.

Of that, £28.7m was spent on “adverse legal costs” in 3,394 cases. Officials spent a further £0.9m on tribunal award payments split between 6,442 cases.

And the Home Office made 272 compensation payments for wrongful detention totalling £6.9m.

Other compensation payments totalled £1.7m, while the Windrush compensation scheme involved 100 payments totalling £400,000.

The Lib Dems said the bill could have paid for an extra 900 police officers. Home Affairs spokeswoman Christine Jardine said: “Priti Patel, who is already under serious pressure, has shown herself to be incompetent and nothing more than a millstone around government’s neck. People deserve better.”

8. Number 10 just took control of all the government’s data

Downing Street has taken control of the government’s use of data – wresting it from the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) department.

Boris Johnson announced the move in an eye-catching written statement on the “machinery of government.”

The responsibility for government data policy will be moved to the Cabinet Office from DCMS, where it was placed by Theresa May in another ‘snuck out just before recess’ move in 2018.

It comes days after Number 10 advertised for a £135,000 data scientist to join a ‘skunkworks’ Downing Street team to be known as ’10ds’.

It’s thought to be the latest in Dominic Cummings ‘ bid to ‘revamp Whitehall’ with trendy data science.

The job ad said the unit will be a ‘pseudo start-up within No10 designed to drive forward the quantitative revolution. The current plan is to establish a data engineering team, data science team, a skunkworks and an analytical deep dive unit.’

Mr Cummings infamously pioneered the use of data-driven political campaigning in the UK in Vote Leave’s successful EU referendum campaign.

SNP MP Owen Thompson said: “Dominic Cummings should not be trusted with data use.”

9. Government’s renters protections won’t stop unfair evictions

Renters will still be at risk of unfair eviction, despite the government’s new rules for landlords.

Evictions have been banned since the start of the coronavirus crisis – but that’s due to expire in August.

Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick had promised new rules would give more protection for renters when the eviction ban is lifted.

But today, minister Chris Pincher confirmed that the new rules will not give judges the power to prevent so-called Section 21 – or ‘no-fault’ – evictions.

Under such eviction notices, renters out of contract can be evicted with just two months’ notice without the landlord having to give a reason.

Asked by Housing Committee chairman Clive Betts whether a court would be allowed to refuse such a request under the new rules, Mr Pincher admitted they would not.

He said: “Under the 21 clause of the ’88 act, the courts do not have discretion in that particular circumstance.”

10. The government is cutting overseas aid by £2.9bn

Foreign aid spending is being reduced by £2.9 billion, Dominic Raab has announced.

The government is committed to spending 0.7% of GDP on overseas aid spending.

But the UK economy has shrunk dramatically due to the Coronavirus pandemic – so 0.7% of the economy is about £2.9 billion less than it used to be.

Announcing the cut, Dominic Raab said it would include “underspends, delaying activity and stopping some spend.”

But Sarah Champion, chair of the International Development Committee, said: “The announcement today raises more questions than it answers.

“The letter speaks of delaying activity and stopping some spending – what is the timescale on this? If it is with immediate effect, do the projects know or will they find out via the media as DFID staff did about the merger? Is there an overarching strategy in place? Will the evaluation of the impact of these cuts be made public? Where is the scrutiny?

“Clearly there has been no consultation, but to release this news literally as parliament rises so there can be no scrutiny by MPs is poor practice.”

Cheap, popular and it works: Ireland’s contact-tracing app success

“A government minister once compared Ireland’s health care system to Angola – a political minefield of dysfunction, bureaucracy, waste and inefficiency. The nickname stuck.

Yet this morass has just produced a shiny success: a Covid-19 contact-tracing app that is popular and appears to work.” [A more detailed description of how this was achieved here].

Since launching on 6 July, the Covid Tracker app was downloaded 1.3m times in eight days – the fastest-downloaded app per capita in Europe – and has started picking up cases of infection.

“We’ve been delighted by the take-up rate. It’s gone beyond the initial hopes,” said Colm Harte, the technical director of NearForm, the company that made the app for the Health Service Executive (HSE).

The app uses a phone’s Bluetooth signal to exchange a digital handshake with another device also running the app when users come within 2 metres of each other for more than 15 minutes. The anonymous keys are stored in a log on the phone, which health authorities may ask users to upload if they are diagnosed with Covid-19. The log can then be used to track unnamed contacts, who are alerted about possible infection.

NearForm made a similar app for Gibraltar, which launched last month, and one for Northern Ireland, due to launch within weeks. “It’s the same core platform. It’s built on the Irish solution,” said Harte.

“An Irish solution to an Irish problem” is a derisive term in Ireland for attempted fixes that are daft or quixotic. In this case, though, there seems no need for self-deprecation.

Ireland has made a tool against the pandemic not only for Ireland but for part of the UK and for a British overseas territory – while Britain flounders in its own attempt to produce an app.

The NHS Covid-19 app was meant to roll out in England in May. That slipped to June. Last month, officials ditched the app in its original form and backed an alternative designed by Apple and Google. The government said it might launch in winter.

The Irish are not crowing. Authorities originally hoped to launch the app in March, only to encounter complications. And its effectiveness remains unclear. “It still has to prove its mettle,” said Seán L’Estrange, a social scientist at University College Dublin who has studied tracing.

Even so, the take-up rate is impressive, said L’Estrange. “What that shows is the credibility of the app, the confidence in the initiative, and the enthusiasm for participating in the collective project to contain the virus.”

The €850,000 (£773,000) price tag is “dirt cheap” given that the average cost of identifying each case of infection is €42,000, said L’Estrange. “Even if it fails to produce the goods, little has been lost.”

This suggests Ireland’s health system, plagued in normal times by bloated management, turf battles and duplication, can do well in a crisis.

“The whole of the organisation attuned itself and focused on coronavirus,” said Fran Thompson, a HSE spokesperson. The pandemic allowed the HSE to shortcut the regular tender process and select NearForm in mid-March. “It probably saved six to eight weeks,” said Thompson.

NearForm employs 150 people and builds software mostly for private clients. It is based in a former council office in Tramore, a seaside town in County Waterford, but has international pedigree, with developers scattered across 21 countries. Clients include Condé Nast, Intel and Microsoft.

Following Singapore’s lead, NearForm’s developers raced to build a centralised app that used smartphones’ Bluetooth connectivity to trace people who come into close contact with infected people.

By April, they had a version but were struggling with Bluetooth. It worked with Android but Apple’s iPhone operating system sent apps to sleep when unused and Bluetooth could not activate them.

“We quickly hit the same problems as other countries,” said Harte. A centralised system also raised alarms about storing data and breaching privacy.

Then Apple and Google came together and offered an app that would support public health apps and let Android and iOS phones connect even while locked. Their decentralised version held no data in a single official database, alleviating privacy concerns.

The Irish were among the first to grasp Silicon Valley’s offer in late April. “We got in early and it was full steam ahead. It allowed us to move on,” said Harte.

Britain, meanwhile, persisted with attempts to make a customised app until last month when it made a U-turn and embraced the model preferred by Apple and Google.

NearForm claims to be the only company to have built apps with interoperability across borders and jurisdictions – Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, and Gibraltar and Spain.

Using the same source code and supplier should facilitate a coherent all-Ireland response to the pandemic – a decision that raised no political problems at the Stormont assembly.

Thompson credits Ireland’s fast take-up rate to the population’s trust in government, desire to do the right thing and good user experience based on consultation and behavioural research.

Big questions hang over the app. How many people are using it correctly? Will downloads hit 2.2m to reach 60% of the target demographic? Will public transport and other settings sabotage Bluetooth’s accuracy? How many people will be notified and tested that otherwise would have been missed?

Stephen Farrell, a computer scientist at Trinity College Dublin who has studied contact-tracing technology, said the app’s impact on the pandemic may remain unclear. “I’d not be surprised if we never end up with a definitive answer to that.”

‘Yes’ to glass canopy on terrace of new Michael Caines eatery in Exmouth

A terrace on the Michael Caines restaurant at Exmouth’s new watersports centre can feature a retractable glass canopy after proposals were given the go-ahead.

East Devon Reporter eastdevonnews.co.uk 

The celebrity chef addressed East Devon District Council’s (EDDC) Planning Committee before members approved the transparent addition to Sideshore this morning (Wednesday, July 22).

It is aimed at boosting the eatery and ensuring the dining area can be used all-year-round.

Other minor changes to the seafront scheme will also see two parking spaces lost, but a pair of electric car charging points added.

Mr Caines told the virtual meeting: “I think it will enhance the scheme and also bring a lot of enjoyment to our guests that’ll be dining in a really modern and up-to-date  environment which will complement the work that’s ongoing and Exmouth, which is definitely on the up and a great area for people to come and visit and enjoy seasonal and also regional food at the facility.

“The benefit and the reason why we are doing it is simply to extend our ability to use that area, not just through the summer but also into the winter.

“The wind is an issue there so we have concerns with regards to tables and chairs and umbrellas for some protection for our guests.

“One of the reasons why we want to put a cover on is to extend the season into the winter, of course, but also ensure our guests can enjoy the space out there safely in that exposure because we know that there’s a lot of wind in Exmouth, a lot of sand that carries across the area, and also that, even in the summer, those conditions can be a bit blustery.

“That’s also going to allow us in this critical time where table space – we need to exert a one-metre distance between each table – so having this additional space will also help the viability at this particular point of the project to enable us to profit from as many tables as we can to pay back the rent.

He added: “We’re taking everything in hand to mitigate any access of light from the glass extension by using curtains but also the only lighting we’re having in there is low-impact festoon lighting, which will give an ambience of very, very low impact so that our guests can enjoy the facilities.”

Permission was sought for a transparent canopy – with retractable walls and roof – to cover the first-floor terrace that will form part of the under-construction Queen’s Drive venue’s restaurant.

Plans submitted before the coronavirus pandemic said the space has the capacity to seat up to 60 people.

EDDC development manager Chris Rose told councillors the visual impact would be ‘acceptable and minimal’.

After: The Exmouth watersports centre complete with retractable glass canopy on the first-floor terrace. Picture: Grenadier/PBWC Architects

After: The Exmouth watersports centre complete with retractable glass canopy on the first-floor terrace. Picture: Grenadier/PBWC Architects

Resident Anne Membury objected and told the committee in a statement the canopy would ‘cause more of an obstruction to the vista at Exmouth seafront’.

She also bemoaned the loss of parking spaces on the seafront.

Cllr Paul Hayward, EDDC portfolio holder for economy, said: “Benefits of this far outweigh any potential harm. They will be an ongoing asset to this facility.”

Cllr Bruce de Saram added:  “The use of the terrace all-year-round will be of significant benefit.”

Cllr Joe Whibley said: “This is a small change and, if the people who want to make the change think it’s going to increase the revenue generation and give something to the town over a longer part of the year, I can’t see any reason other to accept this.”

Cllr Geoff Pratt added: “The proposal for the restaurant will be a winner as far as I can see. A good location for a meal in the evening time during the winter.”

The application was granted permission by 14 votes to one abstention.

EDDC officers had recommended the scheme for approval and told members in a report: “The use of the terrace all-year-round will result in a greater level of noise and light impact, but, given the small nature of the area and distance to nearby properties, the proposal will not result in any detrimental impact that could justify refusal of planning permission, particularly given the economic benefits provided from wider use of the area.”

Bid to replace Beer Social Club with six affordable homes is approved

A community-led bid to demolish the old Beer Social Club and build six ‘affordable’ homes for ‘local people’ has been given the green light.

East Devon Reporter eastdevonnews.co.uk 
Proposals for the site in Berry Hill were unanimously approved by East Devon District Council’s (EDDC) Planning Committee this afternoon (Wednesday, July 22).

The scheme will see four townhouses and a two-storey block featuring a pair of apartments erected on the steeply-sloping, ‘redundant’ hillside site.

EDDC development manager Chris Rose said the project was to provide ‘local housing for local people’.

From the planning application for home to replace Beer Social Club, in Berry Hill. Image: Beer Community Land Trust

From the planning application for home to replace Beer Social Club, in Berry Hill. Image: Beer Community Land Trust

The 100 per cent affordable housing scheme will see a trio of units made available to rent and three for shared ownership.

Rachel Collins, applicant Beer Community Land Trust’s architect, said: “Beer has around 30 per cent holiday homes which inflate the local house prices, therefore schemes like these really are essential if local people are going to remain living in the village.”

Committee member Councillor David Key said: “What an absolute wonderful opportunity for some of the youngsters to be able to get hold of something like this.”

Cllr Philip Skinner added: “I think it’s fantastic that a village of this scale is getting affordable housing at this level.”

The townhouses will be in a pairs of semi-detached units with proposals also featuring six parking spaces and communal amenity space.

Councillors voted unanimously in favour of granting the application planning permission.

Beer Social Club Berry Hill

Beer Social Club in Berry Hill. Picture: Google Maps

EDDC officers had recommended the scheme for approval and told members in a report: “The proposal would result in the loss of a building formerly used for social and community gathering purposes, however, that use ceased some time ago and there are other venues within the village which can perform a similar function.

“As such, the redevelopment of the site to provide affordable housing to help meet an identified need within the village weighs strongly in favour of the scheme.”

Tackling the tax gap – National Audit Office (NAO) Report

This report examines the effectiveness of HMRC’s approach, in partnership with HM Treasury, in reducing the tax gap (£31 billion in 2018-19, equivalent to 4.7% of the total tax owed.)
Background to the report

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) reported record tax revenue of £627.9 billion in 2018-19, an increase of £22.1 billion (3.6%) on 2017-18. Tax administrations rely heavily on taxpayers reporting and paying their taxes in line with the rules. In 2018-19 HMRC received 90% of total tax owed this way. Inevitably some taxpayers make mistakes, others choose not to comply, and some cannot pay because of insolvency. In other cases, taxpayers interpret tax rules differently from HMRC, which can affect the amount of tax they pay, or construct artificial arrangements to avoid tax. HMRC’s most recent estimate of the difference between the amount of tax theoretically owed and the amount collected – known as the tax gap – was £31 billion in 2018-19, equivalent to 4.7% of the total tax owed.

A wide range of factors affect the tax gap, some of which are outside the control of tax administrators. For example, the state of the economy, demographic changes (such as more people in self-employment) and the perceived fairness of tax policy can all affect how many voluntarily pay tax (voluntary compliance). Tax administrators can increase tax revenue by encouraging voluntary compliance and stopping non-compliance. This includes making the tax system easier to use, detecting mistakes when taxpayers submit their returns and catching deliberate attempts not to comply.

Content and scope of the report

This report looks at HMRC’s approach to tackling the tax gap. HMRC needs to understand the scale and trend of the tax gap, to gauge its performance in collecting tax revenue and to inform decisions about how to tackle non-compliance. In this report we consider:

  • HMRC’s understanding of the scale of the tax gap (Part One). We set out HMRC’s definition of the tax gap, the main causes and trends in how it has changed, and the strengths and weaknesses of the measure;
  • HMRC’s performance in closing the tax gap (Part Two) including: the amount of tax it generates through its interventions (compliance yield); and whether it takes sufficient account of returns on investment and deterrence effects when deploying resources; and
  • HMRC’s plans for closing the tax gap (Part Three) including the evidence supporting its strategy, progress implementing the strategy and plans to develop comprehensive performance measures.

Report conclusions

In July 2020, HMRC reported that it had reduced the tax gap from its recent peak level of around 7.2% of theoretical tax owed (£38 billion) in 2013-14 to 4.7% in 2018-19 (£31 billion). The figures can be subject to considerable revision each year making it difficult to use the tax gap as a measure to assess performance, particularly in the short-term. It does, however, help in understanding the relative size of each area of the tax gap. HMRC is developing a wider set of indicators to help improve its understanding of its performance.

HMRC’s measure of compliance yield remains the best indicator of its performance because it calculates the direct return from its work to tackle the tax gap. Performance against this measure suggests that HMRC’s work to tackle non-compliance offers good value for money, with rates of return ranging from 7:1 to 44:1. When reducing resources HMRC has chosen to prioritise areas offering lower rates of return to maintain sufficient coverage of all taxpayer groups.

Keeping the tax gap low remains challenging because taxpayers continually change their behaviour to exploit opportunities in the tax system. Although organised around taxpayer groups, HMRC has successfully reduced the tax gap by targeting the underlying incentives behind non-compliant behaviour, in particular in relation to mass-marketed tax avoidance schemes. Lessons from these successes have not been applied more broadly, such as where taxpayers bend the rules or do not take reasonable care. Developing approaches to change the underlying behaviours could complement HMRC’s ongoing work and improve value for money.

Homes, not shops, are key to High St. renewal – report

Promises by government ministers to revitalise high streets with a new breed of shops should be abandoned in favour of turning town centres into residential hubs, creating at least 800,000 homes, according to a report that aims to influence a Downing Street review of planning laws.

With all this uncertainty about what the “new normal” might mean surely now is not the time to press ahead blindly with the GESP (Greater Exeter Strategic Plan) but pause, reflect, and go back to the drawing-board? -Owl

Phillip Inman www.theguardian.com 

The Social Market Foundation (SMF) said the decline of the traditional high street could not be reversed by policies that “turn the clock back” to a time before online shopping, especially after the trend accelerated during the coronavirus pandemic.

Homeworking was also likely to become a permanent feature of many jobs, leading to further declines in footfall in town and city centres and the closure of more retail outlets.

Empty shops should be given a new lease of life as homes or be torn down in favour of modern apartments to support “new and more beneficial uses for town-centre sites”.

The thinktank, run by former Daily Telegraph executive James Kirkup, said in its report, A New Life for the High Street, that under a “conservative assumption” 5% of commercial land could be released for development, allowing at least 800,000 homes to be built.

Boris Johnson is keen to overhaul the UK’s planning laws and has brought several former thinktank specialists into No 10 to draft a new scheme by the end of the year.

Housing minister Robert Jenrick said last month he wanted to move to a zonal planning system that forced councils and other interested bodies to agree a framework for new developments, sweeping aside the current case-by-case assessment of individual proposals.

The report’s author and SMF research director, Scott Corfe, said he doubted a zonal system that pushed aside council oversight in favour of a framework approved by ministers would allow community assets such as parks, sports centres and open spaces to be protected.

It would also likely deny councils the funds to promote social housing, he said, which was crucial to maintaining a mix of households in town centres.

The SMF said it favoured France’s Zones Franches Urbaines, which offer tax incentives for firms that move to the zones and generate employment. It said a UK version could offer “tax incentives contingent on the hiring of local workers – particularly those that have lost work as a result of economic change accelerated by the coronavirus crisis”.

The thinktank said: “There is a role for government to take the initiative in plans to repurpose urban centres, with a significant role for local authority housebuilding to provide affordable homes for those on lower incomes.”

The SMF said ministers should give councils the green light to close shops and turn them into homes using funds previously allocated to paying local authority debts.

Chancellor Rishi Sunak could transfer the £80bn owed by councils to the central government balance sheet, freeing councils to make improvements in their local area and generate jobs.

“This would essentially transfer local government debt into the hands of central government, which is better-placed to service the debt,” the report said. “A debt write-off would liberate local authorities to invest in urban renewal projects – including the creation of new schools, parks, and sports facilities.”

Corfe said: “Politicians pledging to save the high street are promising voters the impossible. Instead of claiming they can turn back the clock, leaders should aim to make inevitable change work better for urban centres and populations.

“Trying to prop up high street retailers facing long-term decline is not an act of kindness to workers or towns. It just postpones the inevitable and wastes opportunities to develop new policies to help workers and towns embrace the future.

“Nothing can stop the demise of traditional high street shopping so it would be better for politicians to support the next chapter in the story of the high street, with hundreds of thousands of new homes that bring new life to our urban centres.”

Job losses at Exeter Airport – up to 96 face redundancy

Yesterday the “pipe-dream”, today the hard reality

Almost 100 jobs are to go at Exeter Airport, with the owner blaming the economic fallout from the coronavirus health crisis for changing the way it must operate.

Paul Greaves www.devonlive.com 

A consultation has begun with workers employed in a wide range of roles, including baggage handlers, air traffic control, ground crew, security and the fire station. The process is likely to last several weeks.

It is understood that 96 jobs will go.

Parent company the Rigby Group, which owns the airport, says it needs to ensure the long term sustainability of its operation in the face of a new reality that commercial aviation will not recover to pre-Covid-19 levels for some time.

A spokesperson for Exeter Airport said: “The aviation industry is one of the hardest hit by travel restrictions as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and Exeter Airport is not immune.

“We, like every other airport in the UK, are working incredibly hard to realign our operational requirements against the new world emerging post-lockdown with a view to getting the airport restored as quickly as possible and we will fight to protect every job we can.”

The union which represents most of the workers in line for redundancy has called on bosses to work constructively to lessen the impact of job losses.

News of the cuts is the latest blow to the airport after the collapse of Exeter-based airline company Flybe. The firm, which accounted for 80 per cent of the airport’s passenger traffic, went into administration in March.

The Covid crisis also crippled the wider aviation industry with planes grounded and international travel cancelled. Many workers at the airport were furloughed as part of the Government’s Job Retention Scheme. The JRS is due to end in October.

Since Flybe’s demise the airport has announced some new daily flights. There are hopes, post Covid, that other airline operators will firm up plans to fly from Exeter.

There are also moves for a new ‘freeport’ to be centred on the site to boost the region’s economy after Brexit. If those plans materialise then many thousands of job could be created in the area.

John Stevenson, spokesman for Prospect the union, which represents most of those facing redundancy, said: “Our membership is going through a consultation now. We believe this is a hasty decision. The JRS and furloughing is still in place and will be to October.

“We are still awaiting significant information from the airport itself and call on them to fully engage and be more transparent in its future plans. The consultation is ongoing and we will be aiming to mitigate the number of redundancies and work with members to identify solutions to any job losses.”

He said the union thought it would be well into August before the consultation was concluded.

Law allowing developers to convert shops into homes “truly disgraceful” says RIBA

The UK government’s plans to extend permitted development rights will produce tiny “sub-standard homes” warns the Royal Institute of British Architects.

www.dezeen.com 

 

The new laws will allow developers to convert commercial and retail buildings into housing without making a full planning application extending permitted development (PD) rights that already allow office buildings to be converted.

“No evidence that the planning system is to blame for the shortage of housing”

“The extension of this policy is truly disgraceful,” said Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) president Alan Jones.

“There is no evidence that the planning system is to blame for the shortage of housing, and plenty to suggest that leaving local communities powerless in the face of developers seeking short-term returns will lead to poor results,” Jones added.

“Even the government’s own advisors concluded that permitted development had ‘permissioned future slums’ – allowing sub-standard homes to be built with little to no natural light and smaller than budget hotel rooms.”

Jones’ comment about “future slums” is a direct quote from the final report from the Building Better, Building Beautiful Commission, which advised that local authorities be given powers to set higher standards for PD schemes.

Law designed to cut “unnecessary bureaucracy”

Law changes will also mean full planning applications will no longer be needed to demolish buildings and rebuild them as housing.

Property owners will also be allowed to add two more storeys of accommodation to existing residential units. These new laws will come into effect in September 2020.

“We are reforming the planning system and cutting out unnecessary bureaucracy,” said UK housing secretary Robert Jenrick.

“These changes will help transform boarded up, unused buildings safely into high-quality homes at the heart of their communities.”

“Permitted development conversions do seem to create worse quality residential environments”

However, an independent government report published today has revealed homes created through the current permitted development system are of a lower standard of quality than residential schemes that go through planning permission.

“Only 22.1 per cent of dwelling units created through PD would meet the nationally described space standards (NDSS), compared to 73.4 per cent of units created through full planning permission,” reads the report. “Studio flats of just 16 metres squared each were found in a number of different PD schemes.”

Over 70 per cent of homes in PD schemes had windows that faced in only one direction, and most were only one bedroom or studio apartments.

“Permitted development conversions do seem to create worse quality residential environments than planning permission conversions in relation to a number of factors widely linked to the health, wellbeing and quality of life of future occupiers,” concluded the report.

Homes built in converted offices or shops in business parks were particularly bad, the report found, as they were far away from amenities.

Developers and architects argue PD is cost-effective

Permitted development has existed in some form since the UK planning system was inaugurated in 1948. The most significant change to the law was in 2013 when converting offices to residential use without planning permission was introduced.

The report, which looked at case studies in towns across the UK and included interviews with planners and developers, said that the case for PD was “slightly more nuanced” than previous media coverage had suggested.

In interviews with developers and architects, the researchers found these groups appreciated current PD rules because they made the process faster and more cost-effective. Conversely, increased legislation could discourage developers from taking on these projects.

“Requiring higher standards (such as compliance with NDSS) could reduce the number of housing units delivered, particularly in those locations with the most marginal development viability,” said the report.

RIBA said it would be writing to the government to lobby for better space regulations.

“The extension of PD rights is not just damaging – it’s a missed opportunity,” said Jones.

“There are fantastic examples of high quality, low cost, sustainable developments across the UK, like the 2019 Stirling Prize-winning Goldsmith Street – but to ensure these become the norm we need changes to the tax and funding systems to incentivise investment in sustainable buildings alongside minimum space and environmental standards.”

Goldsmith Street is a social housing development in Norwich by Mikhail Riches, which Piers Taylor called a “roadmap for precisely the type of housing the UK needs“.

Home owners permitted to add two extra floors

Home owners will soon be able to add an extra two floors to their houses without needing full planning permission.

By Roger Harrabin BBC environment analyst www.bbc.co.uk 

And developers will be able to knock down unused commercial premises and build residential units.

The government said the new rules would prompt people to build more bedrooms or flats for elderly relatives, and create additional apartments.

The changes will be allowed under what’s known as Permitted Development.

This restricts the powers of local councils to prevent development going ahead.

The councils are appalled, saying the deregulation does not allow local people a proper say in the way their area looks.

But the government says it will mean redundant space can be quickly re-purposed to revive High Streets and town centres. It adds that if householders want to build upwards they’ll have to carefully consider the impact on neighbours and the appearance of the extension.

Quality of life

The move comes on the day of a damning report to ministers about a previous government scheme to allow commercial buildings to convert to residential.

It said just a fifth of the resulting homes met national space standards. Some flats were just four metres by four metres, and 10 of the units surveyed appeared to have no window at all.

Seven out of ten of the units couldn’t get adequate light or ventilation.

It concluded the scheme has created worse homes – “affecting the health, wellbeing and quality of life of future occupiers”.

Speaking about Tuesday’s further deregulation, Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick said: “We are cutting out unnecessary bureaucracy to give small business owners the freedom they need to adapt and evolve, and to renew our town centres with new enterprises and more housing.

“These changes will help transform boarded-up buildings safely into high quality homes at the heart of their communities.

“It will mean that families can provide much-needed additional space for children or elderly relatives as their household grows,” he said.

Unsightly extensions

The government believes the planning system is a block on economic growth, but some councils say their planning systems can’t cope because the government has stripped so much of their funding.

Local Government Association housing spokesman David Renard, said: “The planning system is not a barrier to housebuilding with nine in 10 planning applications approved by councils. .

Neighbours have the right to comment on a development and “should not be exposed to the potential of unsightly large-scale unsuitable extensions being built unchallenged and without scrutiny in their communities,” he said.

Mr Renard added: “It risks giving developers the freedom to ride roughshod over local areas with communities having no way of ensuring they meet high quality standards, provide any affordable homes or ensure roads, schools and health services are in place.”

Follow Roger on Twitter @rharrabin

Teignbridge back plans to have say on Greater Exeter plans

The meeting heard that irrespective of whether Teignbridge was part of the GESP or not, the Government housing targets require 760 new homes a year to be built, although being part of the GESP could reduce the numbers in Teignbridge with the other districts providing a greater share. [Owl emphasis]

Note EDDC Strategic planning Committee considers the GESP and consultation tomorrow 5 pm

Daniel Clark www.devonlive.com

Teignbridge District Council has become the second of the four administrations in the Greater Exeter area to sign up to consult on a blueprint for development in the region.

The Greater Exeter Strategic Plan will provide the overall spatial strategy and level of housing and employment land required across Exeter, East Devon, Mid Devon and Teignbridge in the period to 2040.

A minimum target of 2,663 homes per year, or 53,260 homes over the 20 year period of the plan, is required to be built, with the overall need for development sites equating to 63,912 homes.

Exeter City Council’s executive had previously approved going out to consultation in September on the GESP Draft Policies and Site Options consultation document, and Teignbridge’s executive on Tuesday morning unanimously gave the thumbs up.

As well as outlining policies for how development should take place, it includes 39 sites where major housing or employment land could be allocated, although not all of the sites will be taken forward to the final version of the GESP.

The meeting heard that irrespective of whether Teignbridge was part of the GESP or not, the Government housing targets require 760 new homes a year to be built, although being part of the GESP could reduce the numbers in Teignbridge with the other districts providing a greater share.

Cllr Gary Taylor, portfolio holder for planning, proposing that the council does agree to the consultation, said: “The numbers are significant but there is no additional burden placed on Teignbridge above the 760 mandated by the government formula.”

Leader of the council, Cllr Gordon Hook, added: “I would ask everyone to face reality. This authority is restricted by government dictate. No one in the room believes that the housing formula is right, just, fair, or what we need locally, and I have made my position manifestly clear.

“We do not like the formula and the numbers imposed on us and would have it differently, but reality is we cannot do anything about it. We don’t like the idea of using good agricultural land and are looking for good brownfield site exploitation.”

He added that the numbers of houses required to be built in the region is set down by Central Government, and referring to the Conservatives General Election win last year, said: “In December, the public voted overwhelmingly for mass building.”

Newton Says No councillor Richard Daws though called on the Liberal Democrat administration to press the pause button on the GESP. He said: “We have voiced our concerns over housing numbers which are overstated, and the other major concern I have with GESP, is that we are entering a post-covid world with a pre-covid plan. I want to be a matter of public record than when the debris from covid is still flying in the air, I think it is reckless to proceed rather than pause as things will change in a way we can’t get our heads around and the council is responding as if things are normal.”

However Cllr Andrew McGregor said the post-covid world could lead to even more people wanting to live in the district if more people work from home, and so the demand for houses could be greater, not lower, in a post-covid world.

The executive unanimously agreed to put the GESP Draft Policies and Site Options consultation document out for consultation, and subject to approval by East Devon, and Mid Devon councils, the eight week consultation will take place between September 21 and November 16, with the responses feeding into a recommendations over which sites to take forward.

The GESP allocates 39 sites for development, although not all sites will be included in the final document. While 63,912 homes are required over the life of the plan, existing planning commitments – either unbuilt homes with planning permission or sites in local plans – amount to about 33,390 homes.

The GESP proposes that about 18,500 of the homes are provided on strategic scale GESP allocations, with 12,000 to be allocated on smaller sites via local plan reviews and also potentially in neighbourhood development plans.

Worst hit regions in the UK named as economic impact of coronavirus laid bare

New figures show the areas in the UK where businesses have been worst affected by the coronavirus pandemic.

South West – 61.9% of businesses reporting a fall in revenue

www.mirror.co.uk

According to new statistics from the ONS, Scotland was hit the hardest with 62% of businesses reporting a decrease in turnover outside of the normal range.

This compared to 58% in England and Wales, and 49% in Northern Ireland.

In terms of regions, the North East was hardest hit with 64% of businesses saying their turnover had fallen by at least 20%.

By contrast, Northern Ireland saw the lowest impact, with 49% seeing a drop, and had the highest proportion of businesses with turnover unaffected at 28%.

But while 58% of businesses still trading reported a fall in turnover, some 12% said turnover had increased.

Worst hit regions according to the ONS

  1. North East – 64.3% of businesses reporting a fall in revenue
  2. Scotland – 62% of businesses reporting a fall in revenue
  3. South West – 61.9% of businesses reporting a fall in revenue
  4. Yorkshire & the Humber – 61.2% of businesses reporting a fall in revenue
  5. West Midlands – 60.9% of businesses reporting a fall in revenue
  6. North West – 60.1% of businesses reporting a fall in revenue
  7. East Midlands – 59.3% of businesses reporting a fall in revenue
  8. South East – 59.2% of businesses reporting a fall in revenue
  9. London – 58.9% of businesses reporting a fall in revenue
  10. East of England – 58.7% of businesses reporting a fall in revenue
  11. Wales – 57.5% of businesses reporting a fall in revenue
  12. Northern Ireland – 48.9% of businesses reporting a fall in revenue

When it came to business resilience – that is to say how well prepared companies are to handle a downturn – Wales was found to be at the most risk.

Some 44% of firms in the principality had less than 6 months cash reserves, compared to 41% in England, 37% in Scotland and 35% in Northern Ireland.

The worst hit sector by the virus was arts, entertainment and recreation – with 61% of businesses still closed and 48% of businesses not planning to reopen in the next two weeks either.

Accommodation and food services were next worst off, with 22% of firms not planning to start trading for at least 2 weeks and another 26% closed but looking to reopen soon.

The new figures come as the ONS also reports a staggering 650,000 drop in the number of people employed on payrolls and a more than doubling of those claiming benefits.

Worse could be to come too, with one business in three saying it plans to lay off staff in the next three months.

But not everything is faring badly.

“There were three industries where 99% or more of businesses reported continuing to trade (including trading for more than the last two weeks or had started trading again within the last two weeks after a pause in trading),” the ONS said in satement.

It highlighted water supply, sewerage, waste management and remediation activities sector (100%); the human health and social work activities sector (private sector businesses only) (99%); and the manufacturing sector (99%).

Ministers lavished millions on towns in marginal Tory seats before polls

Ministers used a government regeneration scheme to target millions of pounds in grants at marginal Conservative seats before the last election, an analysis by The Times suggests.

Oliver Wright, Policy Editor | George Grylls www.thetimes.co.uk 

Today a report by the National Audit Office (NAO) reveals the process by which ministers selected 101 towns in England to each benefit from a £25 million boost to their economies last September.

It shows 61 of the towns were chosen at the discretion of ministers led by Robert Jenrick, the housing and communities secretary. An analysis shows that all but one of them were either Conservative-held seats or Tory targets before the election.

Of those held by Conservative MPs, 80 per cent had majorities of less than 5,000. Only one Labour seat targeted for funding did not fall to the Conservatives.

Only two towns chosen had Tory majorities of more than 10,000 before the election, one of which was Mr Jenrick’s seat, Newark.

The revelation is likely to put pressure on Mr Jenrick after controversy over his approval of a housing development backed by a Tory donor against the advice of officials.

Last night Meg Hillier, who chairs the Commons public accounts committee, said it would look into the matter. “This NAO report shows that some of the most deprived towns in England will be left behind once again,” she said. “Taxpayers’ money is not other people’s money and if ministers were so closely involved it might be seen by some as political.”

She added: “Nine out of ten towns were ruled out with no explanation before they reached the starting line, while some affluent towns are still in the running. Ministers relied on flimsy, cherry-picked evidence to choose the lucky towns. Those that lost out have not yet had the chance to make their case.”

The NAO’s findings bear out Times research from November last year which found evidence of the fund being used to boost Tory target seats.

Steve Reed, the shadow communities secretary, said: “There are now serious concerns that ministers may have allocated funding for political gain at the 2019 election, something which breaks strict rules on impartiality.

“The secretary of state must explain as a matter of urgency how ministers decided where to spend this money and why so many communities lost out.”

The £3.6 billion towns fund was unveiled last summer shortly after Boris Johnson entered Downing Street as part of his early pledges to “rebalance growth” across England after Brexit.

Those towns selected to benefit from the scheme were announced by Mr Jenrick in September but his department refused to publish the selection criteria amid criticism that affluent towns had been prioritised over poorer communities. The NAO’s report reveals that officials attempted to create a set of seven criteria for deciding which towns should benefit, including income and skill deprivation, low productivity and exposure to Brexit.

But while ministers accepted a recommendation that all 40 high-priority towns identified be selected to bid for funding they retained discretion over the remaining 61 places allocated.

The NAO report shows that these towns were often less in need of assistance — 12 were officially classed as “low priority’” of which, The Times’s figures suggest, nine were in marginal seats.

A spokesman for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: “As set out in the report the department put in place a robust process to identify towns for Town Deals, which ministers followed throughout. The selection criteria was set by officials and took into account factors including income deprivation, skills, productivity and investment opportunities.”

Exeter Airport freeport could create 27,000 new jobs

This story first surfaced in March as an idea in response to the collapse of Flybe. Looks to Owl to be a bit of a hastily drawn up pipe dream

Keith Rossiter www.devonlive.com 
A freeport centred on Exeter Airport would boost the region’s economy after the Brexit transition period at the end of this year and could create 27,000 new jobs, Ministers have been told.

The government is being urged to give the green light to the region as one of ten new freeports from next year.

Freeports are hubs for business and enterprise. They could be free of checks and paperwork, and include customs and tax benefits.

These zones reduce costs and bureaucracy, encouraging manufacturing businesses to set up or re-shore.

The most successful freeports globally attract businesses and create jobs for local people through liberalised planning laws.

Ministers invited bids last year, ahead of the UK leaving the European Union.

Now a partnership of ten businesses and local authorities has submitted a bid that brings together the marine strengths and port assets of Plymouth, the knowledge economy and airside capabilities of Exeter and East Devon, and the aerospace and engineering excellence of Somerset.

Together, this embryonic partnership will bring together more than a million square feet of port, airport, high value manufacturing and innovation and knowledge-intensive space, combining assets and strengths from a diverse range of partners, from the Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Associated British Ports and regional and city airports, to Yeovil helicopter manufacturer Leonardo and Devonport Dockyard operator Babcock Marine.

The government wants to establish ten freeports to boost the economy after Brexit. It is understood that seven front-runners have been identified already, leaving 14 bidders to compete for three places.

The concept would be particularly significant for Exeter which, along with Plymouth, has been identified as the city most reliant on trade with the EU.

Tim Jones, chairman of the South West Business Council, said: “This would enable greater Exeter to reduce its current high dependence on EU exports and imports.

“This proposal is an exciting and creative response in the midst of the current economic crisis. If awarded, this could result in significant job creation and wealth opportunities for a wide range of businesses.”

The freeport proposal would look to create more than 27,000 high value digital, manufacturing and professional jobs in the local area over the next 20 years, adding around £500 million of additional value to the local economy.

The bid is put together by ten local partners from the public and private sectors. They include representatives from Plymouth, Exeter and East Devon and South Somerset.

Exeter is one of the UK’s fastest growing cities, and its regional airport served a million passengers a year before the lockdown.

The partnership represents an economy worth around £8 billion a year and a wider travel area of around 2.5 million residents.

The area has significant strengths in digital innovation, green technologies and future mobility, and believes it has an offer that can compete with the best in the world and accelerate and drive forward the economy of the South West.

Partners in Exeter and East Devon are working closely through the Heart of the South West local enterprise partnership to develop a Gateway to the digital freeport concept.

Digital activity in the South West has more than doubled over the past ten years, growing 107%. The Exeter and East Devon economy has provided around 45% of all growth in the past decade.

The Exeter and East Devon Growth Area Partnership represents key public and private partners in the Exeter growth area of Devon, bringing together the Heart of the South West local enterprise partnership (LEP), Devon County Council, East Devon District Council, Exeter City Council and Exeter Airport.

Between them they represent an economy worth around £8 billion a year.

The partnership is now awaiting final proposals and a formal bidding process from the Government, which is expected to come later in the year.

Chief nurse was dropped from briefings after refusing to back Cummings

England’s chief nurse has confirmed she was dropped from the Downing Street daily coronavirus briefing after refusing to back Dominic Cummings.

Asked by the [Public Accounts] committee chair, Meg Hillier, for her views on Cummings’ behaviour and whether it was a breach of the rules, May said: “In my opinion the rules were clear. They were there for everyone’s safety and they applied to us all.”

Ruth May said that in a trial run for the 1 June briefing, she was asked about Boris Johnson’s chief adviser’s decision to drive his family from London to Durham during lockdown while his wife had suspected Covid-19.

After she failed to back Cummings, she said, she was told she was no longer needed for the televised press conference taking place later that day, and she was never given an explanation why.

Ministers and No 10 have denied reports that May was stood down over Cummings. Aides to the prime minister briefed journalists at the time that she may not have made it to the briefing because she could have been stuck in traffic.

Appearing before MPs on the House of Commons public accounts committee on Monday, May said she had attended preparations for the briefing and was told she was no longer needed, without explanation. “It is indeed true I was dropped from the briefing, but that happened to many of my colleagues as well,” she said.

Asked if she was questioned in a trial run before the briefing about her views on Cummings’ behaviour during lockdown, May said: “We talk about lots of these preparations questions and of course I was asked about lockdown and rules to lockdown.”

Asked by the committee chair, Meg Hillier, for her views on Cummings’ behaviour and whether it was a breach of the rules, May said: “In my opinion the rules were clear. They were there for everyone’s safety and they applied to us all.”

She added: “I don’t know why I was dropped from the briefing, you would have to ask other people.”

In May’s absence on 1 June, the health secretary, Matt Hancock, presented the daily slides on Covid-19 alongside Prof John Newton from Public Health England.

Appearing before the Commons on Monday, Hancock was asked by his Labour shadow, Jonathan Ashworth: “Did he really acquiesce in the silencing of the chief nursing officer at the height of this pandemic?” Hancock did not respond to the question.

On 12 June, Grant Shapps, the transport secretary, told the daily briefing that May had not been blocked from attending. He said: “I don’t think it is true,” before adding that he was “sure she’ll be back here again”.

Scientific and medical experts who appeared at other briefings alongside a politician were initially reluctant to get involved in the row surrounding Cummings, who while in Durham also made a 60-mile round trip to a beauty spot, which he said was to test his eyesight before a longer journey back to London.

On 28 May, Johnson tried to prevent the chief medical officer for England, Prof Chris Whitty, and the chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, from answering questions on the subject, before Whitty said that neither he nor Vallance wished to comment on politics.

However, on 30 May, England’s deputy chief medical officer, Jonathan Van-Tam, caused embarrassment for the government by saying, in response to a question about the alleged lockdown breach: “In my opinion the rules are clear and they have always been clear. In my opinion they are for the benefit of all. In my opinion they apply to all.”

Responding to May’s comments, Layla Moran, the Liberal Democrat leadership candidate, said the incident suggested ministers were “happy to silence the science when it suits them”.

Downing Street has not responded to a request for comment.

Press Release From Save Clyst St Mary on GESP

‘THEY PAVED PARADISE TO PUT UP A PARKING LOT!’

The 1970 lyrics in the original “Big Yellow Taxi “song chorus written by Joni Mitchell chant “. . .  you don’t know what you’ve got til its gone – they paved paradise to put up a parking lot” and these words seem still to reverberate and be relevant some 50 years later in connection with some 2020 inappropriate development proposals. 

Devon decision makers are questioning  the growth proposals put forward in the recently published Greater Exeter Strategic Plan (GESP) Draft and Site Options and Sustainability documents, that are due to go out to public consultation for comments from 21 September until the 16 November 2020.

Local media headlines are declaring ‘Greater Exeter plans slammed as ‘a dreadful assault on Devon’, so it would appear that many people in the surrounding local authorities of Exeter are not welcoming these future, vast growth proposals. A recent excerpt from a news article quoted a Teignbridge District Councillor stating:-

“The GESP is a plan that was dreamt up in a pre-covid world. It was ill thought out and does not represent the very best interests of the residents. The purpose of it is to shoulder the weight of Exeter’s ambitious growth targets – more ambitious than China’s . . .”! 

Such vast proposals for increased housing, employment and other developmental targets are planning to be foisted on large swathes of agricultural, green fields in neighbouring rural districts in a quest to achieve a renowned “Green Exeter” that could result in the City being esteemed for its future environmental qualities, pedestrianisation and cycling!

The Government’s Local Plan Experts Group highlighted the importance of joint working, particularly in city regions like Exeter, where administrative boundaries mean that urban housing needs may not be met – but there must be caution to ensure that rural areas surrounding city regions do not become over-developed as a result of attempting to meet this urban need. The GESP could result in sizeable areas of our countryside morphing into large, dormitory suburbs of Exeter with the loss of many highly-valued, rural communities that will be fiercely defended in favour of a more locally-based, sustainable, tailored development. 

Although the GESP is only in its infancy, there are already disagreements between GESP partners and such incompatibility is fuelling fears of loss of control and compromise for the local councils surrounding Exeter.   

Although Government housing targets are required to be met by individual councils whether or not a joint venture (GESP) can be agreed – the fact is that the Government’s overall proposed housing numbers appear flawed. Last year The Campaign for the Protection of Rural England (CPRE) delivered a crucial, comprehensive report that the Government’s projected housing figures were far in excess of the actual housing requirements.

Furthermore, many experts maintain that the existing local employment land planning model is outdated and outmoded, with many employment sites around Exeter (e.g. Skypark) continuing to remain vacant. Therefore, any  benefits from many of the GESP proposals seem only likely to be reaped by a few local landowners, who will see their agricultural fields magically transformed  into ‘huge pots of gold’ from planned lucrative housing numbers in the tens of thousands or substantially increased employment sites or both!

It is acknowledged that co-ordination between the GESP authorities would appear to be the key to moving forwards to accommodate future growth for the combined areas of Exeter, East Devon, Mid Devon and Teignbridge to deliver the necessary improvements to large-scale infrastructure and services, especially to the highway network. Furthermore, a co-ordinated approach is preferable when looking to secure large-scale government funding and investment on extensive wide-ranging strategic matters and theoretically joint decision-making should result in a high quality plan – but there appears to be some crucial issues that still require a great deal of further consideration. 

Any spatial development strategy must ensure protection of our key environmental assets and recognise the huge impact of large increased development densities in rural areas. Such extensive proposed development around the villages of Clyst St Mary, Sowton, Clyst St George, Farringdon, Woodbury, Clyst Honiton and Aylesbeare cannot be judged as an appropriate balance between the need to support the economic aspirations for the Greater Exeter area whilst maintaining and enhancing the natural environment and improving health and social wellbeing.

Although some neighbouring East Devon landowners of Higher Greendale, Hill Barton, and Oil Mill Lane, Clyst St Mary may have jointly offered up huge areas of agricultural land for development in what may appear accessible and well connected locations close to the Exeter City boundary – this should not mean that such intensive development should be concentrated in only one East Devon area, resulting in the loss of many individual village communities and valued green open spaces! 

The current detrimental traffic issues have been recognised in the GESP proposals by planning the relocation of the existing Motorway Service Area at Junction 30 to be re-positioned to Poltimore East. This would alleviate the immense pressure on the highway network around Junctions 29, 30 and 31 of the M5 and all the surrounding arterial routes. However, providing this new infrastructure will require major funding that can only be achieved by major growth. 

GESP proposals also intend re-positioning the crucial, considerable problem of Exeter’s traffic, by re-locating parking to the outskirts of the City boundaries on large ‘park and ride’ sites in a “they paved paradise and put up a parking lot” scenario, subjecting many villages to a future loss of valued, rural environments and a worsening of daily traffic pollution, congestion, tail-backs and rat-running through residential areas to avoid the gridlock! Such proposals will certainly improve the traffic, pollution and environmental qualities for the City of Exeter but at the expense of detrimentally affecting adjoining smaller rural communities by offering a ‘give with one hand and take away with the other hand’ solution to these traffic problems! 

Sustainable development should deliver a balance of economic, social and environmental roles within planning and all three should be equally weighted. Many believe that economic growth has been the main driver of the GESP to date, leaving the social and environmental roles forced into the background for a build build build policy!

The previous Issues Consultation in 2017 highlighted the importance of significant community involvement in preparing the GESP taking into consideration its role alongside local and neighbourhood plans, the importance of environmental issues, health and wellbeing alongside housing and employment needs, transport and infrastructure provision and it is critical that an equilibrium is achievable for all communities.

If lockdown through Covid-19 has taught us anything – it should be the importance of our natural, rural, green countryside and open spaces to enhance our physical and mental wellbeing and surely proportional growth in different areas is preferential to massive over-development of specific regions just because their boundaries are close to Exeter and the M5 corridor? 

District council defends charges for Spoken and Grapevine over use of The Strand for outdoor seating

A decision to charge two Exmouth pubs a combined £1,000 for using The Strand for outdoor seating without permission has been defended by the district council.

The Grapevine and Spoken were both charged £500 for putting tables and chairs in The Strand on the weekend between Friday, July 10 and Sunday, July 12.

East Devon District Council (EDDC), which owns the land, said neither business had completed a temporary event notice (TEN) application in time.

Both George Nightingale of Spoken and Oliver Bainbridge of The Grapevine took to social media to say they were told they had permission until it was rejected at the ‘11th hour’ due to concerns raised by police.

Both landlords called for people to write to the chairman of EDDC Mark Williams to lobby for the charge to be rescinded and for them to be allowed to use The Strand.

EDDC said they were hoping to work with both businesses to grant permission and that the £500 covers the charge for using The Strand and legal fees.

In a video posted on social media, Mr Nightingale said: “The hoops and hurdles put in our way to do things for the town are absurd.

“The Strand should be being used by as many businesses as possible, including The Grapevine, and I encourage its use even if its detrimental to Spoken in the short term because it’s for the betterment of the town and would make us all worker harder.”

An EDDC spokesman said: “A fully completed application did not reach the council until Friday, July 10, and due to concerns raised by the police there was insufficient time to approve their application.

“The concerns raised were not intended to block use altogether, and we had every intention of working through the concerns to support the two businesses.

“It was the action of the two businesses’ in using the space without permission which has caused an issue.

“Whilst we want to support business in this difficult time, uses must still be authorised.

“This all could have been avoided if the two businesses had worked with us in good time and through the proper processes to allow use of the Strand space.”