I’ll wait for the vaccine made from Matt Hancock’s tears’, say Brexiteers

 DavidH www.newsbiscuit.com

Screenshot 2021-02-07 at 18.26.08

A consequence of stirring nationalism for political gains by the Conservative Party is rearing its divisive head in the fight against Covid-19. One GP has stated that he is aware of more than ten people who have turned down the Pfizer vaccine in order to “wait for the English one”, experiencing comments, such as: “I want that one made from ketchup plasma”, and “Will it make me speak German?”

The issue first arose after the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine was approved for use in the UK. Boris Johnson hailed it as “a triumph for British science” with Matt Hancock adding: “it’s the Billy Elliott of boosters.”

Reports followed claiming Downing Street had attempted to get doses of the Oxford vaccine labelled with the Union Jack and packaged within a stick of Blackpool rock – a request that was ultimately rejected.

Dr Barry Smith, currently working on a new one-shot vaccine, said the development of coronavirus vaccines was “an international effort. To promote it as being the product of one country, like Champagne or black puddings, is nationalism.” he added. But fearing the problem of nationalism may escalate, Dr. Smith quickly added: “But er, the vaccine we’re currently developing at our Buckingham Palace-shaped laboratory at Stonehenge is fundamentally based upon the purified essence of Matt Hancock’s tears. They are well known to be of a sincerity powerful enough to combat any contagion. Comes in red, white, and blue too.”

With an obvious lump in his throat and on the verge of producing more vaccine, Mr Hancock added: “My sincere hope is that I can protect every UK citizen as fast as I can and at the same time shed a few extra pearls for those around the world that aren’t lucky enough to live in our land of hope and glory. And if I can make a few extra quid selling them, then so much the better.”

Mother Nature sends another message……

Mockingbird spotted in Exmouth!

See below and in today’s Times

Planning applications validated by EDDC for week beginning 25 January

The Queen and the Treasury to bank huge windfarm bonanza

During the North Sea Oil bonanza, Margaret Thatcher blew the proceeds on tax cuts. Norway created a  sovereign wealth fund instead. 

The Green party is calling for the creation of a “green sovereign wealth fund” to tackle the climate crisis. What will our current Government do? – Owl

Jillian Ambrose www.theguardian.com

The Queen and the Treasury are in line for a multibillion-pound bonanza from renewable energy, after a major auction of seabed plots for windfarms off the coasts of England and Wales attracted runaway bids.

The crown estate, which manages the monarch’s property portfolio, holds exclusive rights to lease the seabed around the British Isles. With its first auction of windfarm licences in a decade understood to have reached record highs, the Queen’s income is expected to leap by at least £100m a year, while the takings will generate over £300m a year for the Treasury.

Two windfarm sites within the Irish Sea have reportedly attracted the most frenzied bidding, with energy firms offering to pay as much as £200m for each – a total revenue of £400m a year. Awards for another three areas have yet to be decided. The licences are for 10 years, meaning the auction will raise at least £4bn over a decade.

The vast sums involved have prompted calls for the revenues from Britain’s renewable resources to be kept by the public in a “green sovereign wealth fund” that could be used to invest in tackling the climate crisis.

“Rather than being squirrelled away in Treasury coffers, how much better would it be to use this renewable windfall as initial capital for a sovereign wealth fund that could then be invested for future generations, similar to what we’ve seen the likes of Alaska and Norway do in the past with their oil wealth,” said the Green party co-leader, Jonathan Bartley.

The crown estate declined to comment on the confidential process which requires all participants to sign ironclad non-disclosure contracts to prevent leaking commercially sensitive details about the process before it has concluded.

The identity of the winning bidder is not known, but market sources told the industry journal ReNews that it was likely to be a large oil producer. Companies including BP, Shell and Norwegian oil producer Equinor have all taken an interest in offshore wind as oil revenues decline and pressure rises to pursue green energy portfolios.

The crown estate’s profits from the multibillion-pound windfall would more than double the property manager’s £345m earnings in the last financial year. The money is handed to the Treasury before 25% is returned to the royal household in the form of the sovereign grant.

The sovereign grant was increased in 2017, from its previous level of 15%, to pay for extensive renovations at Buckingham Palace. It will stay at 25% at least until the next five-year review in 2021-2022, meaning the royal household should benefit directly from the money raised from the new windfarm leases.

The Crown Estate was given the renewable energy exploitation rights to the seabeds around Britain in 2004, under an Energy Act passed while Tony Blair was prime minister. MPs voting through the legislation at the time are unlikely to have predicted the sea change in energy provision now leading forecasters to predict wind will become the dominant energy source in the UK.

The prime minister, Boris Johnson, has set a target for every home in the UK to be powered by offshore wind by 2030.

An industry journal reported this week that windfarm developers were left dismayed at the runaway auction which will lead to “bonkers” revenues for the Queen’s property manager.

The initial auction rounds held earlier this week revealed a winning bid of around £150,000 per megawatt a year for two separate 1.5GW windfarms in the Irish Sea, according to ReNews, or five times higher than the top bids expected in the early rounds.

The winners of the Irish Sea sites will be required to pay the crown estate about £200m a year in “rent” for each licence area, while building the offshore windfarm, or a total of £2bn for each windfarm site over the 10 years it usually takes to develop these projects.

In total, the auction will award leases from 7GW worth of offshore wind power capacity in areas around the English and Welsh coastlines, with the potential to deliver clean electricity for more than 6m homes.

Sign up to the daily Business Today email or follow Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

Traditional renewable energy developers are understood to be unhappy about the aggressive auction bids, claiming that the process risks distorting the UK’s green energy market by inflating costs which could ultimately be shouldered by energy billpayers.

The crown estate was forced to overhaul its proposed auction process in 2019 after the industry warned that calling for “closed envelope” bids would lead to excessive prices. Instead, it promised to use daily bidding cycles to make the process more transparent. However, the first round of the auction was still “closed”, leading to an aggressive start.

The auction is ongoing, and the results will be confirmed only once it has closed.

May elections to go ahead – where will our “Chameleon” stand?

The Government’s intention to go ahead with the local elections in May has been widely reported

[Until, of course, they cancel them. Last minute cancellations is a neat way of impoverishing the small parties and independent candidates.]

No one knows whether any form of canvassing or even door-to-door leafleting will be allowed. Currently they would not constitute a valid reason to break lockdown rules. Any leafleting may have to be done through existing commercial delivery firms. So it doesn’t looks like a very level playing field.

Voters will have to take their own pencils to the polling station to make their mark. No pencil, no vote?

Chloe Smith, constitution and devolution minister, said:

“Democracy should not be cancelled because of COVID.

“More than ever, local people need their say as we build back better, on issues ranging from local roads, to safer streets, to the level of council tax…….

“We will work with political parties to ensure that these important elections are free and fair.”

Already the balance is tipping against independent candidates. 

Nevertheless, despite this, Owl has reasons to be optimistic that the Tories across Devon will lose seats.

Owl will develop this theme over the coming months.

Or more parochial interest (to Owl, if no one else) is: which “Division” in East Devon will be the lucky one to have Cllr Ben Ingham as its Conservative candidate.

Having been “Independent” Leader of EDDC Ben has turned Conservative and set his sights on the County. As reported by Owl  in October, Ben had a pop at ousting that old stalwart Cllr Christine Channon for the Exmouth and Budleigh Coastal Division but failed. (Owl thinks veteran Cllr Channon will struggle to find support in the Exmouth half of the the significantly redrawn boundaries).

Owl doesn’t know if he has been successful elsewhere but is convinced he will be trying, and Owl understands that the Tories are having difficulties finding candidates.

If not then Owl wonders whether he might even try to run under a different label such as an “Independent Conservative”, a “Conservative Independent”. He could even re-brand himself a “Real Conservative” or an “Alternative Conservative”. 

Though on past form Owl thinks a “Provisional Conservative” might be the most suitable description.

Is Honiton our own Handforth?

Some, like a recent correspondent, think you have to look no further than EDDC:

“For those of us in East Devon, this was very similar to the outbursts under the “old guard” so hardly  a surprise!

Honiton Nub News does not seem to have featured Jackie Weaver and the “goings on” at Handforth Parish Council to date. 

Given the series of explosive meetings and fallings out within the Honiton Town Council over the past few months, Owl is surprised. This news surely wouldn’t have escaped Honiton Forward. Owl’s advice: press record!

The Hansworth meeting is still being dissected nationally with particular emphasis on the display of male aggressive behaviour. Some welcome the move to online Zoom meetings because it eliminates the physical intimidation that can occur in council chambers.

In the Observer Gaby Hinsliff reports this and suggests, in lighter vein, there should be a statue to Jackie Weaver. Owl thinks many would agree with her:

Don’t mess with Jackie Weaver, boys. She’s got a mute button and knows how to use it 

Gaby Hinsliff www.theguardian.com 

Some day, there will surely be a statue to Jackie Weaver.

Women will take their small daughters to see it and deliver homilies about the importance of standing your ground with pompous and aggressive men in meetings, which their daughters won’t understand at the time but will remember with startling clarity once they actually start work. And just as MPs entering the Commons chamber used to touch the bronze foot of Winston Churchill’s nearby statue for luck, aspiring politicians will stop and offer silent thanks to Jackie, the patron saint of women who are having absolutely none of your nonsense.

Well, we can dream. But if nothing else, the heroine of last week’s most unexpected viral content has given everyone something other than Covid-19 to think about. Weaver was the host of an extraordinary (in every sense) Zoom meeting of Handforth parish council’s planning and environment committee, footage from which ended up on YouTube, after it had descended into a terribly British form of naked power struggle.

First, she removed the obstreperous chairperson from the online meeting despite his protests (“You have no authority here!”). Then the incandescent vice-chair stormed off his sofa in solidarity (“Read the standing orders! Read them and understand them!”), leaving the studiedly calm Weaver to lead more mild-mannered colleagues in getting some actual work done. Nevertheless, as the saying goes, she persisted……………..

And then there are discussions of the legal and constitutional issues involved with what appears to be a poorly written, ambiguous and possibly contradictory set of Council Rules.

Did Jackie Weaver have the authority? – the law and policy of that Handforth Parish Council meeting

A blog by davidallengreen.com 

Who concludes:

This viral incident is an insight into the reality of one local government meeting.

On balance, it would appear the disruptive councillors were wrong to say the extraordinary meeting was invalid.

And, on balance, the exact manner of their exclusions was not in accordance with the Standing Orders – though, in the circumstances, the disruptive councillors can hardly complain.

You would not get any of what really happened from the official minutes.

This is a useful reminder to all – including historians and legal commentators – that formal documents often do not give the full story.

As such this video is a boon for public transparency of council meeting.

This is why all council meetings should be streamed and available on video.

And in conclusion, on the face of the Standing Orders, Jackie Weaver did not seem to have the authority to call the extraordinary committee meeting – but she did not need to do so.

Weaver did not have authority as ‘Proper Officer’ – but she did not claim that she had such authority and she did need not any such powers for clerking.

Weaver did not appear to have the formal power to exclude the disruptive councillors – but, given that this exclusion was then accepted by the new chair, and that the disruption was plain, that does not seem to practically matter.

And these conclusions can be offered on the basis of reading the Standing Orders – reading and understanding them.