‘The lying got to me’: How Boris Johnson helped fuel the rise of independent councillors

The political chaos of 2022 could prove fruitful for independent candidates in Thursday’s local elections as they aim to offer an apolitical alternative to those alienated and frustrated by the main parties.

Eleanor Langford inews.co.uk

A Conservative Party source told i in the run up to the local elections that they expected many of their voters to stay at home, as they’d become “depressed” by the churn of prime ministers and the party’s poor standing in the polls. But others are turning to candidates with a more local agenda.

Samantha Harvey, a councillor in Rutland, East Midlands can understand their frustration. After winning her seat in 2019, she resigned from the Conservative Party alongside two colleagues in May 2022, just over a month before the resignation of Boris Johnson.

“It wasn’t what had been done, it was the lying that had got to me, and the covering up of the lies,” she told i.

“I still have Conservative leanings, there’s no doubt about that, I’ve not suddenly become a massive socialist. But, I think if you remain [in the party] then you condone the behaviour. I’ve got an 18-year-old son – what values am I then teaching [if i stayed]?”

She has now joined the around 2,500 councillors currently sitting as independents in England and Wales. That total has grown rapidly in recent years. In 2017 there were less than 1,600.

Independent councillors are fairly clear about why their cohort has been growing – they offer their communities an apolitical, locally-focused alternative to those disillusioned by national politics.

“As a country, we’re very disenfranchised by our national political system at the moment,” said Noel Ovenden, a councillor in Ashford, Kent and leader of the Ashford Independents.

“I think that there’s a lot of unrest out there, and a lot of people on the doorstep breathe a sigh of relief when they find that there is another option for them.”

His party – which bears the strapline “no national politics in local government” – has proven popular in the area and enters Thursday’s elections with 18 candidates, including 10 incumbent councillors.

Ashford Independents is one of dozens of non-partisan local parties operating across the UK, which act as a support network for independent councillors without requiring its members to vote or campaign in a certain way.

Marianne Overton, is the leader of a similar group, the Lincolnshire Independents, and is also chair of the Local Government Association Independent Group. She told i that much of the support for independent candidates is borne from a sense of being failed at a local level by the national parties.

“I think people are very disappointed and angry at the impact of the national Conservative’s actions, that they’re having a significant adverse impact. They’re making their lives miserable people,” she said.

Ms Overton added that issues like the cost of living crisis, access to housing, stretched NHS services and crime had led many in the area to turn to local politicians who were “independent and prepared to stand up for their communities”.

Keeping the “local” in local politics was what led Geraldine Mathieson, an independent councillor on East Riding of Yorkshire Council, to quit the main parties long before the recent political chaos.

She first stood as a Conservative, but soon realised that “all the politics of the group really got in the way of doing the job properly and serving residents”, and was successfully re-elected in her ward as an independent candidate in 2015.

“I’ve done two elections, and got much higher votes as an independent, which was really nice, because that was a personal vote,” she told i.

“Sometimes if what was best for my residents and for my ward wasn’t what was best for the ruling group, then there was scope for disagreement. And as far as I was concerned, my residents came first.”

Ms Mathieson said that many people “don’t want to get involved with politics” anymore and the main political parties “have ruined a lot of it”.

“People don’t join political parties anymore, so they’re scraping the bottom of the barrel for candidates in many ways. It’s definitely time for independents to come forth and put their head above the parapet,” she added.

For John Whittle, a fellow independent on East Riding of Yorkshire Council, the fact that unaffiliated candidates are growing in number shows that they offer more local voice than the mainstream political parties.

“The proof of the pudding is in the eating. If they didn’t want independent representation, they wouldn’t actually vote for it,” he said.

“I’ve always felt that political counsellors have to serve two masters – they have to serve both the political party and the residents of their area. An independent counsellor has the freedom to represent people as they should be represented.”

Planning applications validated by EDDC for week beginning 17 April

(Apologies, a little later than usual. – Owl)

Tories never bite the hands that feed them

Government defeats move to tighten UK foreign donations law

Will this come to haunt Simon, just like when he helped to vote down the amendment to stop pollution?

Will his new mantra be: “I never voted to accept dodgy money”? – Owl

UK elections remain at risk from interference by hostile states after the government voted down a move to close loopholes on foreign donations to parties, campaigners have warned.

Ben Quinn www.theguardian.com 

The chair of parliament’s security committee was among those who backed an amendment to the national security bill that would have obliged political parties to carry out due diligence on the true source of donations from companies and individuals.

The amendment was sponsored by three members of the House of Lords including the former director general of MI5, Jonathan Evans.

After the government used its majority on Wednesday to whip Conservative party MPs into voting against the proposal, the campaign group Spotlight on Corruption described it as “a badly missed opportunity to protect the next election from malign influences”.

While parties are banned from taking money from overseas states, critics argue that the rules designed to prohibit foreign donations under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (PPERA) are riddled with loopholes allowing money to be channelled to parties and MPs.

Those loopholes could include a UK-registered company which draws on profits from abroad, or Unincorporated Associations (UAs) which can donate money to parties that they receive from foreign sources. The UK’s main political parties were reported in 2021 to have accepted £12.9m in donations from UAs over the previous five years, none of which can be connected to the original donor.

Wednesday’s amendment would have required British parties to publish and keep updated a policy statement to ensure the identification of donations from foreign powers, whether made directly or through an intermediary, and provide an annual statement of risk management to the Electoral Commission.

Julian Lewis, the Conservative chair of parliament’s intelligence and security committee, said he firmly supported the proposed clause, warning MPs on Wednesday that the UK has previously “clearly welcomed Russian money, including in the political sphere”.

“The amendment is eminently reasonable, it shouldn’t be controversial for political parties to want to ensure the transparency of their foreign political donations,” he said. “We must protect against covert, foreign-state-backed financial donations if we are to defend our democratic institutions from harmful interference and influence.”

The security minister, Tom Tugendhat, said the national security bill was “now in a strong position” and had “effective tools and powers to tackle hostile activity taken on British soil”.

The Lords amendment in relation to political donations “is not needed”, he said, adding: “The law already makes robust provision in relation to donations to political parties.

“Foreign donations are banned, it is an offence to accept them and there are strong rules safeguarding against impermissible donations via the back door. Parties can only accept donations from permissible donors, as such the government will not accept this amendment.”

The Labour MP, Chris Bryant, asked during the same debate: “What would a party do if, for instance, they were offered a donation for, let’s say, £50,000 by somebody who lives and works in Moscow today?

“The law says they have to do nothing as long as they are on the electoral register. But surely, we would want to say I’m not sure that that’s quite right.”

The Lords amendment was voted down by 254 votes to 134 – a majority of 120. Lewis was the only Conservative MP who voted against the government to keep the amendment in.

It now returns to the House of Lords, where peers will decide whether to accept the government’s rejection of their amendment, or propose a different amendment.

Be sure to vote today (and take photo ID)

Owl’s concern is that the Conservatives hope to gain seats by default.

By introducing the requirement for photo ID, they have smuggled dishonourable intent in a measure purporting to strengthen the rules.

They have skewed the election by making it harder for young voters to meet the ID requirements. Older voters are more likely to vote Conservative.

They may also be relying on general apathy. It seems to Owl that there are far fewer “Blue Posters” in evidence than usual. This could indicate a general loss in Tory morale, nearly half of existing Tory councillors are not standing, but thinks it more likely to be a deliberate policy designed to create a “low key” setting and low turn out.

Instead, the Tories seem to have used their ample party coffers to bombard electors with leaflets, including using mailshots.

Under our “first past the post” electoral system it is quite common to find a dominant party, such as the Conservatives, gaining power with only a minority of the vote. The outgoing EDDC coalition of LibDems, Independents and Greens (with tacit support from Labour) is a fragile exception.

To maintain this in East Devon, as Owl hopes it will be, requires careful consideration of how to vote. 

The danger is that the “anything but conservative” vote can become split amongst a wide choice of alternatives.

Martin Shaw, Chair of the East Devon Alliance, who played a significant part in helping Independent Councillors become the pivot in the formation of the coalition, gives an insight in the sort of reasoning one might apply to the candidates in the wards in his neighbourhood: Seaton and Colyton; and Beer and Branscombe.

Otherwise here is a common sense  “pecking order” of preferences:

Where they are standing, Owl suggests giving first preference to existing members of the coalition cabinet, portfolio and assistant portfolio holders. Then to those who are members of the coalition or who have supported them.

As mentioned previously, a vote for leaving the Greater Exeter Strategic Plan is a good test of who to vote for. Voting to stay is definitely a “Red Flag”.

Then it may be down to personal preference or, for some, a matter of voting tactically, for which candidate/s is/are perceived most likely to win. Where you have a number of votes you do not have to use them all. Tories will invariably block vote for their party.

The EDDC Humphreys investigation has not featured as an election issue because it has been withdrawn, pending evaluation of “new information”. If accurate, this information has the potential to materially affect some elements of the Verita Report.

The Commissioning Group for this report is led by Simon Davey, Chief Finance Officer, and, in the outgoing council, three councillors: Cllr Ian Thomas (Council Chair), Cllr Sarah Jackson (portfolio holder for transparency and democracy) and Cllr Jess Bailey.

Ian Thomas is standing down. If Sarah Jackson and Jess Bailey fail to be re-elected then all councillor collective knowledge of this investigation will be lost.

Jess Bailey has been the instigator and driving force behind the investigation. In answer to a question from her in a Devon County Council Cllr Leadbetter (Conservative member for  Wearside & Topsham) said: I think you should leave this subject alone. You keep asking questions.”.

Worse, if the new Chair is a Tory, Owl thinks the Verita report will never see the light of day.

Finally, the 2019 election returned a number of younger councillors and it would be healthy for democracy to see that trend continue.