Water firms pleads guilty to Brixham bug outbreak
SWW admitted the offence, contrary to the Water Industry Act 1991, at Exeter Magistrates’ Court. It will be sentenced at a later hearing.
Brixham MP, Caroline Voadon, said:
“Last summer, the government finally started to overhaul our water industry by promising to abolish Ofwat. But progress has been glacially slow. They must go much further and faster – this industry must be properly regulated and held to account.”
Devon’s main water supplier has admitted to providing water unfit for human consumption following a parasite outbreak in Brixham.
In a hearing at Exeter magistrates’ court today (March 4), the firm admitted a charge brought by the Drinking Water Inspectorate.
In May 2024, the microscopic parasite Cryptosporidium entered the local water network through a damaged valve, leading to four hospitalisations and 143 cases of people falling ill with symptoms such as fever, stomach pain, vomiting, and diarrhoea.
The waterborne disease parasite is found in animals and human faeces, according to the UK Health Security Agency.
For nearly eight weeks, the town was under strict boil water notices. Up to 16,000 homes and businesses were affected and relied on bottled water stations distributed throughout the area.
The notice remained in effect until July 2024, causing significant disruption to daily life and the local economy.
Over the eight weeks, more than 1,000 technicians, engineers, and scientists worked 24/7 to sanitise the network, with just over 20 miles of pipes flushed 27 times at high velocity.
The company reported a total cost of £16.3 million in the dedicated tourism recovery fund, as well as a three-year commitment to help the region bounce back from the negative publicity.
In total, the outbreak cost South West Water £16.3 million in compensation it had to pay to affected customers.
MP Caroline Voadon serves the area, says
“This admission of guilt has been a long time coming. I am glad that SWW have owned up to their serious failures. This awful event should never have happened.
“But the mismatch between rhetoric and action plagues our broken water industry. Whether it is protecting customers or the environment, too many water firms say one thing, then do another.
“I want to thank the Drinking Water Inspectorate for bringing the case and the many campaigners who worked tirelessly to ensure the anguish they felt during the cryptosporidium outbreak was not forgotten.
“Last summer, the government finally started to overhaul our water industry by promising to abolish Ofwat. But progress has been glacially slow. They must go much further and faster – this industry must be properly regulated and held to account.”
the idea of privatising water services and many other services is good. Government ownership did not work in the past and it will not work in the future.
I have no immediate suggestions as there is no real quick fix.
however, why not sell share packages to the public and have a management team in place to run the business . The management team should not be allowed to hold shares .
just a thought as I see BT linked to open reach and many such entities that came into being when Maggie Thatcher privatised all those years back but in doing so let the charlatans that gravitate to these sort of deals gain control and they have plundered since then.
Public ownership should be exactly that with the average man in the street being offered tranches of shares at a market related price. No companies or wealthy individuals buying up the water boards and other entities.
LikeLike
Government ownership of utilities may not have worked terribly well, but I am not sure that private ownership has worked any better, and arguably far far worse because:
My argument would be that if the government had raised prices in the same way, and used that money for investments rather than dividends to shareholders then:
I would be interested to see a financial analysis of how a typical utility has been managed after privatisation to quantify the above points. I would guess that the dividends paid out since privatisation are far far far more than the government receipts from the privatisation – in other words, if the government had followed the same pricing and investment, they would have made more money keeping the utilities than from selling them off.
LikeLike