DCC relaxes rules on public speaking just as EDDC tightens them

This is how a request from East Devon County Councillor Claire Wright for a relaxation on the rules about public speaking was dealt with at Devon County Council where the principle was upheld:

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Proposal-allow-members-public-right-question/story-21348385-detail/story.html

Contrast this with East Devon District Council where rules to srastically cut the right of the public to speak at meetings has already been agreed and where the decision will be rubber-stamped later this month (see diary dates above) unless there is a change of heart amongst councillors who want the public to be neither heard (at meetings) or seen (at inaccessible Skypark).

Hugo Swire, MP, calls for transparency – but only about DCC closing residential homes

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/East-Devon-MP-calls-transparency-Devon-County/story-21333137-detail/story.html

Perhaps also look a little closer to home, Mr Swire, and let us know your views on EDDC’s secret meetings, curtailment of public speaking and its refusal to allow the Overview and Scrutiny Committee to investigate the role of the East Devon Business Forum in the Local Plan.

THEN criticise others.

The unintended consequences of more housing: overcrowded schools

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Devon-County-Council-blames-housing-development/story-21308489-detail/story.html

Perhaps as a S106 developers should have to buld and run schools in their development areas?

How many beans make 5? In Budleigh – think of a number, any number, except 5!

Budleigh population exceeds that of Sidmouth – Official!

Because of funding cuts imposed by central government a two tier system is being proposed for Devon Libraries. Medium and larger libraries will upgraded to become “Devon Centres” while smaller and less well-used will have to be run by the community, if they are to remain open at all. To separate the well-used from the less well-used, County Hall policy makers are using some very dubious numerical analysis which has been exposed in a letter from an alert Budleigh resident published in this week’s Journal.

Budleigh always thought its library was one of the most heavily used in the county for its size. It has 2,400 borrowers in a town of around 5,000 (48% active borrowers). In comparison Sidmouth has just under 4,000 borrowers for a population around 13,000 (only 31% active borrowers).

Yet in the hands of the bean counters Sidmouth comes near the top of the county pecking order in terms of utilisation rates with Budleigh relegated towards the bottom. The reason is that DCC statistics are calculated on an interesting definition of the catchment area for each library. These are not based straightforwardly on the population of the town in question, nor on the town plus its surrounding villages (which in the case of Budleigh might push its population up to 7,700).

The calculation is much more complicated, adding to the catchment area the population of the postcode of every borrower. So, if a book is borrowed from Budleigh Library by an Exmouth resident (because he or she prefers Budleigh’s poetry section, for example) then Budleigh’s catchment area is increased accordingly. The result is to raise Budleigh’s official catchment area to more than 18,000 (larger than Sidmouth’s) simultaneously reducing its utilisation rating from 48% to a mere 13%!

Budleigh Library seems to have become a victim of its popularity and theand the Mayor, Caz Sismore-Hunt, is quoted as saying “I don’t think using those figures is fair”. We agree.

The message to officials, and councillors for that matter, is that the East Devon Alliance has a team of forensic bean counters always on the lookout to expose any misleading use of data!

Leaders of all major parties at Devon County Council protest at Government cuts

Can you imagine this level of co-operation (or even rebellion) at EDDC?

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Devon-council-leaders-urge-Pickles-stop-damaging/story-21239702-detail/story.html

An interesting case in Wales of judicial review of cuts without specific consultation

http://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=18800:high-court-judge-gives-green-light-to-library-closure-judicial-review&catid=56&Itemid=24

Setback for council austerity cuts

http://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=18655%3Aadmin-court-quashes-decision-by-council-over-provision-for-three-year-olds&catid=54&Itemid=22

AND naughty DCC and Planning Inspectorate – you have upset EDDC too!

Same agenda as post below

Extract:

Rights of Way

 Another approach to attempt to restrict the Council’s development plans for parts of the Knowle has been Right of Way (RoW) applications.

 These applications were originally rejected by Devon County Council but on appeal against that decision the Inspector directed the County to make Orders in respect of two routes (one of which itself splits into two routes). The County made the Orders in March and the Council (and others) have lodged objections to the Order.

 The Planning Inspectorate will now deal with the matter. It is anticipated that the appeals will be heard (method yet to be decided) in the Autumn. The Council may well choose to withdraw its objections, which may shorten the process slightly, but it will still be determined by the Inspectorate due to other objections (unless they too are withdrawn). It is probable that a final outcome (so either a dismissed appeal or confirmed Order) is likely to take until early winter.

 As was made clear in the Feb 2014 Cabinet report there are a number of ways that objections may be mounted toward the Council’s relocation plans. Project costings have reflected the potential impact of delay and the costs that such objections may result in for the Council.