Is our MP’s Party “Committed to protecting our natural environment”?

Not in East Devon, nor indeed in the UK, as pointed out in this letter in the Exmouth Journal (04/12/2014):

‘Last week Hugo Swire told us that his party is committed to protecting the natural environment, keeping development sustainable etc. But that view is not shared across the country.
The Government planning policies have failed to protect communities from rapid and disproportionate development. That was the widespread view of those, like me, who had been invited form all parts of the country to Westminster in September to give evidence to a Parliamentary Select Committee.
Everyone had stories to share of large tracts of agricultural land being built on; villages doubled in size; brownfield sites in the centre of old industrial towns being left, while the green fields around the margins are being built on because it is cheaper; extensive building in flood plains; the green belt eroded; AONB protection swept aside.
All this is happening under the guise of sustainable development because of the Government’s drive for house building at any cost and in any place. But the term sustainable is so ill defined that using wooden cladding or installing plastic plumbing in place of copper and a low flush toilet, ticks the box.
No thought is being given to social or environmental sustainability. Yes, we need housing to meet local needs, particularly affordable housing. But we are not getting it and we have sacrificed a lot of agricultural land in the process. Affordable housing promised in planning applications disappears when developers plead poverty. I understand none of the affordable housing promised by Tesco in Seaton, for example, will be built.
David Daniel’

So now we know what the majority party Executive group management style is based on!

“You break every rule of good man-management. You bully your weaker colleagues. You criticise colleagues in front of each other and in front of their officials. They can’t answer back without appearing disrespectful, in front of others, to a woman and to a prime minister. You abuse that situation. You give little praise or credit, and you are too ready to blame others when things go wrong.”

From a memo written in 1981 by Sir John Hoskyns to the Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.

Ladbroke’s betting odds today for General Election outcome

Conservatives 1/8
UKIP 8/1
Claire Wright (IND) 12/1
Liberal Democrats 50/1
Labour 100/1

Claire Wright’s odds started at 66/1, then 50/1, then 33/1, then 16/1 and now 12/1 and recently the bookmaker was accepting only a maximum of £20 per bet on her.

Those who trusted their judgment at 66/1 must be getting quite excited!

Labour Party worried about missing voters

[Labour] spokesperson said: “What I won’t sanction is … lots of voters dropping off the register, deprived of their vote, and stopped from taking part in elections because of bureaucracy and badly-implemented government policies. This would be a disaster for our democracy.

“I’m alarmed at the government’s complacency. They speeded up the measured move to individual electoral registration that Labour put in place, and have stripped out the safeguards that were designed to prevent eligible voters dropping off the register.”

He said those potentially disenfranchised are more likely to be students, those in private rental accommodation and members of the black and minority ethnic (BAME) community. He said: “Many of those are already on the margins of society, and stripping them of their votes would make this worse. That’s why I’m clear that if there’s a dramatic reduction in the numbers of those on the electoral register because of the move to individual electoral registration, I’m prepared to pull the plug”.

Recent estimates from the Electoral Commission suggest there are 6 million eligible voters currently not on the electoral register -2.5million more than previous estimates. The Electoral Reform Society has warned that this number could sharply increase with the introduction of individual electoral registration, saying the proposals, if implemented badly, could have a “devastating impact on British democracy by alienating millions of voters right before the 2015 general election …”

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/feb/20/labour-considering-us-style-election-day-voter-registration

We forecast the future – again!

Suddenly, for no obvious reason (!) politicians and their families are trumpeting their volunteering work. According to weekend newspapers, Sam Cam apparently does it and Andrew Mitchell’s children are paragons of international volunteering virtue.

It won’t be too long before all this spreads to East Devon. Watch for new and unusual combinations of local politicians and charities between now and May 2015 – with lots of photo- opportunities, particularly when bad news needs to be offset.

Those local politicians who have consistently worked hard for charities (Steve Gazzard of Exmouth for example springs to mind) would have good cause to feel just a little bit miffed.

Claire Wright’s odds continue to improve (for her!)

Started at 66/1 a few days ago, dropped almost immediately to 33/1, soon after that 25/1 and, quoted earlier today 16/1.

Note that betting companies do not routinely give such odds to idependent candidates – this pattern is quite exceptional.

May be time for those who do these things to place theiir bets before it gets to evens!

The missing 6,000 voters: and the award for best lame excuse goes to – Mark Williams!

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/East-Mid-Devon-district-council-chief-executives/story-24538976-detail/story.html

… The committee was concerned that Mr Williams and Mr Finan were among 22 nationwide that had not included door-to-door canvassing in the process of encouraging more people to register on their district’s electoral roll.

The concern was reflected in the report which stated that an Electoral Enforcement Officer repeatedly failing to comply with their statutory obligations in a way that has an adverse effect on the quality of voter registration, should be subject to enforcement action. …

Note that remarks about having done telephone canvassing in interim years has disappeared , replaced with the words “other sources of data matching” (the Electoral Commission says that no telephone canvassing OR house to house canvassing was done in some years) and Mr Willliams is the only electoral officer in the country soecifically singled out in the Parliamentary Committee interim report for not answering Freedom of Information requests.

The way Mr Williams talks about the problems of canvassing in a rural community makes you wonder just how those EROs in places like Cumbria or Cornwall seem to manage the job, where he cannot. What are they doing right that he is doing so wrong? And how come he doesn’t have the same problem (or the same methods) in rural South Somerset where he does the same job?

Parliamentary Select Committee on Voter Engagement: EDDC cited for refusing to respond to Freedom of Information Requests

The Select Committee inquiry into Voter Engagement has produced an INTERIM report which can be found here:

Click to access 232.pdf

Being interim is unusual, and they are seeking consultation comments on their conclusions and recommendations.

Paragraph 115 comments explicitly on East Devon’s refusal to answer FoI requests.

The Committee notes that despite evidence from the Electoral Commission that they would advise EROs to respond to FOI requests as though they were subject to the Act, East Devon District Council has been refusing to respond to requests for information under the FOI Act from members of the public in respect of electoral registration activity.”

One of the recommendations is that EROs / ROs are brought under the FoI umbrella so that is required by law not just advisory.

It’s election year part 601

…. when your MP, after putting his nose down drains, then picks up a shovel. The giveaway is that he does it wearing a suit and tie!

hugoshovel

(Though Leader Diviani looks as though he has absolutely no intention of following suit!)

Source: http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Hugo-Swire-marks-start-work-Exeter-Science-Park/story-24513866-detail/story.html

Political donations – the Swire connection

An eagle-eyed local correspondent has added more information to our story:

http://eastdevonalliance.org/2014/11/05/political-parties-must-check-the-source-of-their-donations-carefully/

with the following comment:

“I believe from press reports that our own dear MP Hugo Swire might have been the auctioneer who took the winning bid from the parties concerned at the annual Tory fund raiser.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2702132/As-Cameron-talks-tough-Russia-scrutiny-grows-oligarchs-Putin-cronies-showering-Tories-Moscows-millions.html

Wasn’t this also the occasion that Hugo boasted of selling a jar of his (East Devon?)honey for £15,000 ? (He must really be in touch with the struggles of the proles of East Devon!)

Having lived in Henley on Thames, I am familiar with the addresses associated with the winning bidder and Henley Concierge, the latter especially should have started bells ringing.”

Devolved power … but where?

Interesting debate this evening (available on BBC Iplayer) on devolution of power in the south west and how it might evolve.

If power is devolved in England how far should that power go down? To the south-west (if so, where would it start and which city would be its administrative centre), to a Devon/Cornwall/Somerset/Dorset combination (if so, which ones), to Devon (including or excluding Pkymouth and/or Torbay?), to Northern Devon and Southern Devon, to East Devon(!) to a conurbation centred on Exeter and/or Plymouth, to a collection of towns and parishes (if which towns or parishes?).

Who do you trust to hold power?

What a conundrum!

Political parties must check the sources of their donations carefully

The Electoral Commission has recently ruled that the Conservative Party forfeit a £28,000 donation from a company that, in their opinion, was not suitable as a donor:

“The Electoral Commission has agreed the forfeiture of a £28,000 donation from the Conservative Party. This is the full value of a donation that the party accepted from a company called Henley Concierge Limited on 3 July 2013 and that the Commission is satisfied was impermissible.

Under the law political parties and their accounting units must not accept a donation unless it comes from a permissible donor. A company is deemed a permissible donor if it is registered at Companies House and carries on business in the UK.

The Commission considered there was sufficient doubt as to the permissibility of the donor to open a case review to establish whether in fact the donor was permissible. During the course of the case review and following its own checks, the Commission raised concerns with the Conservative Party about the permissibility of the donor. Following these discussions, the party has forfeited the full amount of the donation.”

http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/i-am-a/journalist/electoral-commission-media-centre/news-releases-donations/electoral-commission-concludes-two-party-finance-cases?

No less than the Morning Star has this information on the company involved:

“Austrian-born Mario Hinterdorfer owns Henley Concierge Ltd.

Hinterdorfer is also the personal assistant to exiled Russian oligarch Andrey Borodin, the president of the Bank of Moscow until 2011.”

http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/a-cc7d-You-rang,-MLord#.VFqNoucgGf0

It has also fined Nigel Farage £200 for not appropriately declaring his office rent expenses in the UK:

“Nigel Farage MEP has been fined £200 for failing to annually report to the Commission as required by electoral law a regular non-cash donation of the free use of office premises from a donor, Mr John Longhurst. The failure to report had been ongoing since 2001 and has been independently valued as rising from £3,500 to £3,800 per year over this time.

Mr Farage has paid the fine.”

Should anyone wish to see a list of donations that have been breached, a full list can be found here:

Click to access Cases-publication.pdf

and here is a helpful table of offences that can be committed and sanctions that can be applied:

Click to access Table-of-offences-and-sanctions_for_EP.pdf

Hugo Swire – behind the times yet again

Hugo Swire has just – after seven years – commented on the local plan! And what he says shows that he is – yet again – behind the times in his own constituency. Here is what he says – with annotations:

Unlike some, I have never taken the rather irresponsible position of being anti-development.

This is absolutely true as Hugo has never, in fact, taken any position at all on the local plan during its long history.

The fact is that for decades there has been a chronic shortage of homes, not least due to a growing and aging population. It is absolutely vital that we build more affordable houses, especially for young people in East Devon trying to get on the housing ladder.

We totally agree – but, unfortunately for Hugo, East Devon District Council does NOT agree. Large, cash-rich developers have been allowed to strike out ALL affordable housing in their developments, citing their poverty!

‘However, we must ensure that a balance is struck. We live and work in a wonderful part of the world and it is absolutely crucial that East Devon retains its beautiful landscape and unique character.

Well, here is one thing we can agree on. But it comes a little too late in Hugo’s case. Whilst we – and many others – have been banging this drum for years and years Hugo has been noticeable by his silence.

A completed Local Plan is essential as it would be drawn up in consultation with local people so that they could determine where development should and should not go. However, many of my constituents feel that EDDC’s lack of a Local Plan is allowing developers free rein which is leading to overdevelopment in areas such as Woodbury Salterton.

Now, is it just a coincidence that his constituency office is in Woodbury Salterton? He makes no mention of of Newton Poppleford or Budleigh Salterton and all the other towns and villages in his constituency beset by inappriopriate planning applications due to our lack of a local plan. And his biggest blooper – saying that the local plan “should be drawn up in consultation with local people so that they could determine where development should and should not go” – which reveals his total ignorance of the fact that local people commented in their THOUSANDS before the last iteration of the draft Local Plan and made it TOTALLY clear where they thought development was appropriate and how much there should be. EDDC rode roughshod over these views. Local people – East Devon Alliance in particular – pointed out the weaknesses of the draft local plan – no up-to-date figures, no strong evidence for development sites, the stupidity of relying on a group of local landowners to decide where employment land should be sited – and all was ignored. All these points were picked up by the Planning Inspector who threw the plan out.

‘Today I call on EDDC to make the completion of its Local Plan an absolute priority and, in the meantime, ensure that the green light is not automatically given to developers. Inappropriate planning applications must always be rejected’.

Oh, Hugo, so little, so late! But we guess we should feel privileged that, this close to an election, you are slowly, very slowly coming round to the point of view that most of us have had all along!

Hugo Swire votes against sacking MPs

Here’s the e-mail sent on Tuesday this week (27 October), to an EDA correspondent, from the 38 degrees team:

‘Last night (Monday 27 Oct) your MP, Hugo Swire voted the wrong way. [1]

Yesterday, MPs voted on whether to give voters the power to sack misbehaving MPs. [2] The majority voted no, choosing to stick with the government’s recall law that takes this power out of our hands.

Days like these can be pretty disheartening. They remind us there’s a huge gap between the political system we want and the political system we have.

This won’t be the last opportunity MPs have to vote on this. It could technically be possible to get the changes we want. But, to be honest, it’s pretty unlikely. Not enough MPs are convinced that voters should decide when and why an MP gets sacked.

If you’d like to email your MP, Hugo Swire, and ask him why he voted against giving voters more power, please click here:
https://secure.38degrees.org.uk/real-recall-wrong-way

If you email your MP, you’ll notice that the candidates standing against them at the next election (if they have any yet!) will be copied in. This is important because it’ll show them the sort of things that voters in your area care about.

There are several options for next steps on our campaign. But for today, it feels right to pause and take stock of how far we’ve come. Together, we’ve convinced a huge chunk of MPs that voters should have the power over whether to sack MPs. Sadly, this time it wasn’t enough.

We’ve come along way on this campaign. But if there’s one thing this vote shows us, it’s that we’ve got a hell of a job to do! Although it’s an uphill struggle sometimes, this one vote isn’t enough to stop us.’

PS: If you’d like to read more about the vote, and take part in the discussions about what 38degrees does next, please click here:
https://secure.38degrees.org.uk/recall-next-steps

Where Claire Wright leads, Hugo Swire follows – except where drains and pizzas are concerned

Claire Wright, EDDC Independent Councillor, has long been campaigning to keep the River Otter beavers. Hugo has just jumped on her bandwaggon rather late in the day.

Claire Wright started campaigning to save local community hospitals as soon as news got out that they were threatened and immediately organised a public meeting about her local hospital, attended by more than 200 people. Hugo was initially pro “efficiency changes” saying ” now is not the time to “whip up excitement”

http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/hugo_swire_on_ottery_hospitals_bed_losses_this_is_not_the_time_for_whipping

However, he did bring up smelly drains in Sidmouth and Ottery, having been pictured with his nose down one such drain, promising to get it fixed when it was clear from marks on the pavement in the accompanying picture that remedial work had already been scheduled – as it is in all the towns and villages of East Devon.

He also stole a march on pizza-making in Sainsbury’s in Ottery.

So, if you want to save hospitals and beavers, perhaps Claire Wright is your best bet. But if you want an acute nose for nasty smells and you need to have a pizza made in Sainsbury’s Hugo is your man.

And it’s still more than six months to the general election!