Water companies dumping sewage during dry weather, SAS report finds

Water companies have been releasing sewage onto beaches and in rivers even when it is not raining, according to a report from Surfers Against Sewage.

Helena Horton www.theguardian.com 

Sewage spills are only supposed to happen under exceptional circumstances; when it is raining so heavily that the system cannot cope with the amount of water and effluent being spewed at once.

However, there have been anecdotal accounts of local sewage outflows spilling human waste into local waterways even when it is not raining. Now, SAS claims that that these ‘dry spills’ are happening routinely, against regulations which stipulate outflows should only occur during “unusually heavy rainfall”.

Analysing meteorological data from the Met Office as well as spillage data, SAS found that 146 dry spills were detected over a 12-month period, with 95 of these at locations where water quality is classified as “excellent”. Southern Water, the worst offender, was responsible for four times as many dry spills as the next worst offender, South West Water.

Amy Slack, head of campaigns and policy at SAS, said: “Over the last year, the UK public has made clear their disgust at what’s happening to our rivers and seas, and yet water companies continue to pollute at will. It’s especially alarming to uncover evidence of potentially illegal activity by water companies in the form of dry spills, which are not permitted under current regulations. Shareholders and CEOs are unashamedly profiteering off pollution.”

“It’s high time the government stepped up and took real action to curb the destructive and selfish behaviour of the water companies responsible for this literal shit storm.”

According to data from The Environment Agency, sewage has been dumped into the ocean and rivers around the UK more than 770,000 times over the course of 2020 and 2021 – the equivalent of almost 6 million hours.

Sewage in waterways is also making people sick, the report claims.

As part of its water quality report, SAS has also analysed data from 720 sickness reports submitted to its reporting system. The data found that over a third (39%) of sickness cases correlated to sewage discharge alerts, while 63% of cases that were reported to a doctor were attributed to poor water quality.

The most common illness reported after people swam in the sea or rivers was gastroenteritis, with two in three people reporting symptoms associated with the condition. Ear, nose and throat infections were common too, with respiratory, skin and urinary tract infections also reported.

Over half of the sickness reports related to swims at locations classified as “excellent” under the government’s testing regime.

Dr Anne Leonard, an environmental epidemiologist and microbiologist based at the University of Exeter, said: “We’ve known for over 100 years that sewage contains disease-causing microorganisms, and that ingesting water contaminated with this kind of waste causes infections. These infections may be mild, self-limiting illnesses but they can also be really severe infections that require medical treatment.”

Swimmers have reported anger and upset after having to change how they interact with the water following illness.

Julia Walker, a social worker based in Shoreham, West Sussex, said: “I use the sea to help manage stress from my job as a social worker. In September I went for a swim in a popular spot prior to starting a new job. That evening I experienced diarrhoea and stabbing pain in my kidneys. The doctor confirmed I had a bacterial and a kidney infection. They felt that it was very unusual to have both at the same time but said that this was likely caused by swimming in contaminated water.

“I was unwell for six days, which impacted on my new role. It took me a couple of months to get back in the sea, and now I only swim with my head above water for fear of becoming ill again. It makes me very angry that the water companies are affecting how I use the water.”

A spokesperson at Water UK, said: “Companies agree there is an urgent need to tackle storm overflows. They are set to launch one of the country’s largest ever infrastructure programmes, which, if approved by regulators, will deliver £56bn of improvements for our rivers and seas. That builds on at least £3bn of improvements in the last couple of years alone.

Members of Hastings and St Leonards Clean Water Action protest against raw sewage release incidents on the beach in St Leonards, Sussex, in August. Photograph: Gareth Fuller/PA

“To accelerate progress further, we need government to end housing developers’ uncontrolled connections to sewers without first knowing their capacity, and to end the flushing of wet wipes made from materials that cause blockages and fatbergs. Both are major causes of sewer overloading and spills. We also need government to implement existing legislation in order to increase the use of sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) on new developments as a means of reducing the volume of rainwater entering the sewer system.”

Southern Water told the Guardian: “Storm releases, which go a long way to reduce the impact of the type of flooding we have seen recently, and which are permitted by The Environmental Agency, reduced by nearly 50% this year compared to last, in part due to a dry summer. We’re investing £2bn to improve environmental performance and further reduce their use, by increasing storage capacity and working with partners to reduce the rain runoff entering the system.

“Our data on storm overflows, including unconsented spills, is submitted to The Environment Agency. Our annual bathing water update details how we are working to create healthier rivers and seas. This improvement is being achieved through record additional investment to reduce pollution and prevent flooding, industry-leading monitoring and transparency on spill reporting, and the exploration of innovative, nature-based and engineering solutions.”

Ambulance service ‘in meltdown’ as one in four 999 calls missed in October

Ambulance crews could not respond to almost one in four 999 calls last month – the most ever – because so many were tied up outside A&Es waiting to hand patients over, dramatic new NHS figures show.

Do you remember 2017, the year the local Tories ruthlessly started stripping out our Community Hospitals?  – Owl

Denis Campbell www.theguardian.com 

An estimated 5,000 patients in England – also the highest number on record – potentially suffered “severe harm” through waiting so long either to be admitted to A&E or just to get an ambulance to turn up to help them.

Ambulance officers warned that patients were dying every day directly because of the delays since the service could no longer perform its role as a “safety net” for people needing urgent medical help.

“The life-saving safety net that NHS ambulance services provide is being severely compromised by these unnecessary delays and patients are dying and coming to harm as a result on a daily basis,” said Martin Flaherty, managing director of the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE), which represents the heads of England’s 10 regional NHS ambulance services.

Flaherty added: “Our national data for hospital handover delays during October 2022 is extremely worrying and underlines the fact that in some parts of the country efforts to reduce or eradicate these devastating and unnecessary delays are simply not working.”

The association’s latest monthly handover delays report, published on Wednesday, reveals that the performance of ambulance services fell to its lowest ever level in October.

The report shows that 169,000 hours of ambulance crews’ time across the month was lost due to delays. It meant that paramedics could not answer 135,000 calls. That number represented 23% of ambulance services’ total “potential capacity” to respond to 999 calls.

All three totals are the worst in NHS history.

“The ambulance service is in meltdown. These figures show that it is on its knees and close to collapse as a result of vacancies, underfunding, morale being at a very low ebb and demand for ambulance care having doubled to 14m calls a year since 2010,” said Rachel Harrison, national secretary of the GMB union, which represents 15,000 staff in English ambulance services.

Ambulance services’ ability to respond rapidly to patients needing emergency and potentially life-saving care is being hampered increasingly by hospitals being unable to admit people to A&E fast enough. That is because they have almost 14,000 beds occupied by patients who are fit enough to leave but cannot be safely discharged, mainly because social care provision is inadequate to allow going home or entering a care home.

Steve Barclay, the health secretary, has identified handover delays as one of the greatest challenges facing the NHS. A&E doctors share AACE’s concern that patients are suffering sometimes serious harm, and even dying, as a result of long delays to their treatment.

The AACE report also discloses that:

  • 18% of ambulance handovers took more than an hour last month, when the NHS target is 15 minutes – a nine-fold increase on the 2% seen in October 2019.
  • The average handover time was 42 minutes, up 12 minutes from October 2021 and up 23 mins from Oct 2020.
  • The number of one, two, three and 10-hour handovers was the highest ever recorded.
  • Delays exposed an estimated 41,000 patients to potential harm, of whom about 5,000 were put at risk of, or experienced, “severe harm”, including death.

“These figures are a national disgrace but they only confirm what GMB members tell us every day,” added Harrison. “We’ve got ambulances waiting outside hospitals for more than a day, while terrified workers wait and hope their patients won’t die. In fact, a third of GMB ambulance workers think a delay they’ve been involved with has led to the death of a patient. It can’t carry on.”

The most recent NHS England data showed that ambulances were taking almost 10 minutes to reach patients facing a life-threatening emergency. The NHS target response is seven minutes.

Dr Sitso Amankwah, a GP in Kingston, London, tweeted on Tuesday about a patient who had taken an Uber ride to A&E rather than face a potentially long wait for an ambulance. “That’s good, so not unwell enough to need 999 then,” the GP told the patient. “No, I felt awful, but … Uber could get me there in less than four hours,” the patient replied. Amankwah added: “Ladies and gentlemen, I present you the NHS in 2022.”

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: “The government is clear that the NHS is a top priority and we are making up to £8bn available for health and social care in 2024/25.

“We are providing record-breaking funding which will help get us through the winter. This is on top of the action we’ve already taken including … delivering 50,000 more nurses, increasing the number of NHS call handlers, and creating the equivalent of at least 7,000 more beds, to improve patient flow through hospitals and get ambulances back on the roads quickly. We will publish a full recovery plan for urgent and emergency care next year.”

Affordable homes boost for Exeter

Affordable housing in Exeter has received a boost following the awarding of £293,391 government funding for a scheme in the city.

Exeter City Council news.exeter.gov.uk

The money – from the Brownfield Land Release Fund – will allow up to15 affordable homes to be built in Lower Wear Road.

The funding for Lower Wear Road is part of an overall £911,000 that will see four projects across Devon benefit from government funding. All four projects are on brownfield sites.

The Devon and Torbay One Public Estate Partnership successfully secured the money from the Brownfield Land Release Funding to support the projects.

The funding is a share of £35.9 million awarded to English councils to enable the release of council brownfield land for housing.

The scheme will allow 15 affordable homes to be built using a modular build approach. It is the first scheme of its type that Exeter has put forward for Brownfield Land Release Funding and it will also use the Prisoners Building Homes programme, working with Exeter Prison offenders to construct the modular homes.

Cllr Barbara Denning, Lead Councillor with responsibility for Council Housing, said: “I am delighted with this funding which will help deliver much needed affordable housing in the city.”

The Lower Wear Road scheme is one of a number of sites that the Council are investigating for the delivery of new build, low energy, council housing. This site forms part of the overall Housing Revenue Account development programme, with the aim of delivering 500 new Council Housing homes by 2030.

Other projects across the county set to benefit from the funding are:

  • Shapland Place and St Andrews Estate – Mid Devon District Council. £100 million to create 14 affordable modular homes.
  • St Kildas Brixham – Torbay Council. Provide 23 affordable homes to be delivered by 2025.

Councillor Rufus Gilbert, Devon County Council Cabinet Member for Economic Recovery and Skills, said: “I’m pleased that a number of areas across Devon and Torbay will benefit from this latest round of funding and we’ll be bidding for more in future rounds. The One Public Estate programme is ensuring vital gap funding is making it possible for these essential housing projects to go ahead which is good news for local residents and our local economy.”

The Devon & Torbay One Public Estate partnership is made up of 10 local authorities (Devon County Council, East Devon District Council, Exeter City Council, Mid Devon District Council, North Devon Council, South Hams District Council, Teignbridge District Council, Torbay Council, Torridge District Council and West Devon Borough Council) as well as the Heart of the South West Local Enterprise Partnership, Devon & Cornwall Police, Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service, the NHS, and South Western Ambulance Service.

The Brownfield Land Release Fund is administered through the One Public Estate programme which is a partnership between the Office of Government Property in the Cabinet Office, the Local Government Association and the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities.

Up to £180 million in capital grants will be available through Brownfield Land Release Funding over the next three years. The Devon and Torbay One Public Estate Partnership is currently developing a plan for the later rounds.

Second-home owners in Gwynedd face 150% council tax premium

Second-home owners in north Wales face a possible 150% premium on council tax bills next year with the extra £3m raised set to be used to ease the area’s spiralling homelessness crisis.

The level of surcharging is creeping up and the number of second homes in East Devon has now reached one in 23 properties. – Owl

Steven Morris www.theguardian.com 

Gwynedd council’s housing lead said it was “immoral” for people to have more than one home while other people had nowhere to live and blamed the UK and Welsh governments.

Councillor Craig ab Iago, the cabinet member for housing, said: “It is immoral that there are people with second homes when there are people who don’t have a house at all.”

He accepted that the Labour-controlled Welsh government had started to bring in measures to tackle the second-homes crisis, but said: “It isn’t enough in my opinion. We’ve been asking for help for decades and it’s only now happening.” He also blamed the UK government for creating an economic climate in which the less well-off were left “fighting over scraps”.

The council’s Plaid Cymru-controlled cabinet unanimously backed the idea of raising council tax premiums on second homes to 150% from April at a meeting in Caernarfon on Tuesday. It will ask the full council to give final approval at its meeting next week.

Cabinet members were told that there had been a 47% increase in the number of homeless people in Gwynedd over the last two years – while almost one in 10 properties in the area was a second home.

Since the financial year 2021/22, second-home owners in Gwynedd have been paying 100% council tax premiums. So, for example, a £1,000 bill for a permanent resident would turn into £2,000 for a second-home owner.

The devolved Welsh government has changed the law to allow councils to impose up to 300% premiums as part of a raft of measures designed to tackle the second-homes problem. The cabinet did not think the 300% could be justified but said the rate would be reviewed annually.

Councillor Beca Brown said: “It does stick in the throat that people have more than one house when there are so many people without anywhere to live. I welcome the idea of directing the money that could be raised from the premium towards this crisis.

“There’s hidden homelessness, people who are sleeping on sofas, people who can’t move away from home and are living in parents’ attic rooms. Each of us are just two or three problems away from being homeless. It isn’t just something that happens to someone else. It could happen to anybody.”

The leader of the council, Dyfrig Siencyn, said other places across the UK, from Pembrokeshire to North Yorkshire and Cornwall, were facing similar issues. He also flagged up the problem of Airbnbs. “It’s easy to buy a house, easy to let it. They are the people we need to target.”

So far the debate has focused on second homes in Gwynedd leading to an increase in the price of houses and flats to a level beyond the means of local residents hoping to buy. One major problem this has created is pressure on the Welsh language as speakers are priced out of heartland areas.

But this is in turn is leading to pressure on the rental market because local people who cannot afford to buy are renting – meaning that more people are being pushed into temporary accommodation such as hotels and B&Bs.

MPs allowed to spend thousands on Christmas parties paid for by taxpayer

Boost for the Hospitality Trade – isn’t this what Simon Jupp has been asking for? Anyone had an invite from him yet? – Owl

Rishi Sunak has warned MPs that they will have to justify to their constituents any expenses they claim to cover the cost of staff Christmas parties.

New guidance from the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa) has informed MPs that, for the first time, bills for food, drink and festive decorations can all be claimed,

Adam Forrest www.independent.co.uk 

But the move – which allows MPs to claim potentially thousands of pounds in party costs – sparked a backlash among MPs, who described it as “bonkers” and “irresponsible”.

Ipsa issued the new guidance in response to frequently asked questions about how MPs and their staff can celebrate during the festive season.

The watchdog confirmed that “MPs can claim the costs of food and refreshments for an office festive” in their offices – but warned “no claims are allowed for alcohol”.

MPs were told that any claims “should represent value for money, especially in the current economic climate”, as millions feel the strain of a cost of living crisis.

But the prime minister’s official spokesperson said Mr Sunak would not be making any such claim, and suggested MPs should bear the probable reaction of voters before doing so.

The spokesperson told a Westminster media briefing: “Questions on these sorts of arrangements are for Ipsa, they’re independent of both parliament and government, they set the allowances.

“But the prime minister certainly doesn’t intend to use this and his view is that MPs will want to justify all spending to their constituents.”

MPs will be allowed to charge the costs from a festive gathering in their constituency, but were told it must be “within a parliamentary context” rather than “purely a social event”.

They can even claim the cost of celebratory Christmas cards – but were warned “they should not be sent to large groups or all constituents as there is a risk this may not represent value for money and could be considered self-promotional”.

There is no cap on the Christmas party spending, but the budget for annual office costs is limited to £31,620 for MPs in London seats and £28,570 for those outside the capital.

Among the MPs attacking the rules, former Tory minister David Davis said the expenses watchdog had “missed the mood of the age” by allowing politicians to charge for Christmas parties.

“I’m quite surprised. But I think it’s bonkers, frankly,” he told Talk TV. “It has missed the mood of the age if that’s what they’re saying.”

Labour MP Jess Phillips – in a post on Twitter retweeted by Tory foreign secretary James Cleverly – said Ipsa had been “irresponsible”.

“Just want to say no one asked for this, no one I know will use it,” she said. “The guidance wasn’t made by MPs and yet we will be pilloried for it. I think it’s really irresponsible to issue this guidance.”

Labour MP Charlotte Nichols added: “Sometimes I think Ipsa comes out with stuff like this because they don’t think MPs get enough abuse, so they just throw some petrol on the fire for the craic.”

Shadow business secretary Jonathan Reynolds suggested the expenses watchdog had been a “little bit naive” putting out such guidance. “Ipsa need to be a bit more savvy in terms of how they present what they’re doing on this,” he told Times Radio.

Campaigners also reacted with alarm at the rules. “MPs already get a plum deal without taxpayer-funded office jollies,” John O’Connell of the TaxPayers’ Alliance told the Daily Mail.

Ipsa revealed that the total bill for MPs’ costs increased to £138.6m in 2020-21, up from £132.4m from the previous year.

The biggest rise in the past two years has come from staffing costs, with a rise in casework during the Covid period.

Ipsa chief executive Ian Todd said: “We know that it has been a challenging year for MPs and they have seen another rise in casework.”

Recent analysis by The Independent found that MPs charged taxpayers almost £200,000 for energy bills and other utilities at their second homes over the past year.

In the past three years, MPs have claimed just over £692,000 to cover these utility costs – with £538,000 alone going on heating bills.

Tory Rebels Sink Housebuilding Targets In Blow To Rishi Sunak

A rebellion of more than 40 Tory MPs has reportedly delayed Rishi Sunak’s plan for a housebuilding target.

Where does Simon Jupp stand on this with his hands tied by PPS shackles?

Watch this space on “Soviet Style” planning targets – Owl

Graeme Demianyk www.huffingtonpost.co.uk 

The prime minister was due to face the first major test of his leadership next Monday when MPs were set to vote on the flagship levelling up bill.

But Conservative backbenchers – including former cabinet ministers – have signed an amendment to the bill that would ban councils from taking housing targets into account when deciding on planning applications.

The government on Tuesday night appeared to pull the vote, blaming the congested parliamentary timetable, according to the Telegraph and i newspapers.

But Labour accused Sunak of “running scared of your own backbenchers”.

The rebels had been warned they will “make the recession worse” by scrapping the housebuilding targets.

The amendment is one of several proposed by former environment secretary Theresa Villiers that would bring wholesale changes to the planning system, including making it easier for councils to ban building on greenfield land and providing more incentives to develop brownfield sites.

Villiers’ proposals have been criticised by some, including 2019 Tory manifesto co-author Robert Colville, who said they would “enshrine ‘nimbyism’ as the governing principle of British society”.

Colvile earlier tweeted: “Up to 46 signatories now on the Destroy the Planning System and Make the Recession Worse Amendment 2022.”

But her supporters have insisted that they do not want to stop housebuilding, only give communities more say over where homes are built.

Support for the amendment scrapping housing targets has increased over the past week, rising from nine MPs on November 15 to at least 46 on Tuesday, including prominent figures such as former party leader Iain Duncan Smith and former cabinet ministers John Redwood, Chris Grayling, Damian Green, Wendy Morton and Priti Patel.

The Telegraph put the number of signatories at 50 on Tuesday night.

This would be enough to leave the government reliant on Labour votes to defeat the amendment.

Other amendments proposed by Villiers would see tighter restrictions on homes being converted into holiday lets, more financial penalties for failing to build once planning permission was granted, and allowing councils to take a developer’s character into account when deciding on a planning application.

Downing Street said Sunak was still committed to the government’s target of building 300,000 homes a year.

The prime minister’s official spokesperson said: “We want to work constructively to ensure we build more of the homes in the right places. That’s something that the department and the secretary of state are very focused on.

He added that the housing secretary, Michael Gove, would continue to discuss how the 300,000-home target was delivered.

Labour’s shadow levelling up secretary Lisa Nandy said: “This is a complete shambles. The government cannot govern, the levelling up agenda is collapsing and the housing market is broken. Pulling flagship legislation because you’re running scared of your own backbenchers is no way to govern.

“There is a case for reviewing how housing targets are calculated and how they can be challenged when disputed, but it is completely irresponsible to propose scrapping them without a viable alternative in the middle of a housing crisis.”

Local Plan consultation for Whimple

Historic Devon cyder village under threat

Communication received from “Protect our Whimple & Rockbeare Group”

EAST DEVON LOCAL PLAN CONSULTATION FOR WHIMPLE

Have your say on the future of the village on Nov 29th!

Whimple, Devon, 22nd November 2022 – East Devon District Council is holding a Public Consultation event at the Whimple Victory Hall on Tuesday 29th November between 4:30pm and 8:30pm to inform villagers of the plans for the Draft East Devon Local Plan and to gain feedback from residents. It is a chance to put your views and suggestions forward.

The village of Whimple is on the edge of the expanding new town of Cranbrook, as part of the growth plans laid down in the previous decade. Now, East Devon District Council is on the hunt for more development land. They have created a Draft Local Plan which contains far reaching development proposals that affect East Devon, especially surrounding the City of Exeter. It includes the possibility of large-scale developments bolted onto Whimple, against the will of the people and the principles of localism.

Please come along to the consultation event to understand more about the plans for Whimple and the surrounding area, and to let your District Council know how you feel about the proposals.

Breaking news – Rishi Sunak has been forced to back down on housing targets – see separate post

Budleigh residents offer “verbal abuse” queuing on the street to get their pills

The “old dears” of Budleigh are up in arms.

Not knowing whether either of the two Lloyds pharmacies are open, then sometimes having to queue on the street in the cold to be served.

You wait weeks to get an appointment, then you wait sometimes for days to get any prescribed medication dispensed!

The dispensing of prescriptions in the town has descended into near farce, as has Simon Jupp’s reaction, see below. 

Residents in Budleigh struggling with ‘poor’ pharmacy service

Residents in Budleigh Salterton are struggling to collect prescribed medications due to staff shortages at the two Lloyds pharmacies in Budleigh High Street.

Adam Manning www.exmouthjournal.co.uk 

For the past year, both the Lloyds Pharmacy have been opening with restricted hours. There are occasions when one or other pharmacy is open but sometimes customers have to queue outside the shop.

Sue Lake, chairman of the local Patients Participation Group, (PPG) said: “We have been pressing Lloyds, the NHS and other stakeholders for the past twelve months because the PPG is concerned about patients and whether or not Lloyds are meeting the terms of their two dispensing licenses.

“The PPG continues to be involved in continuing NHS discussions but the current situation of having to queue outside the shop to wait to be served on the pavement is just not appropriate, especially, with the onset of winter.”

 A spokesman for Lloyds Pharmacy said: “Verbal abuse from customers is cited as a contributing factor to three managers leaving over two months. The pharmacies have not been able to be open every day because there is a national shortage of locum pharmacists and also, they have not been able to recruit and train retail staff.”

Many residents of Budleigh and surrounding villages are moving their prescriptions to pharmacies in Exmouth, some offer a delivery service. However, the PPG believe that the best option would be for our town to have two pharmacies which are trusted and reliable to provide a much-needed dispensing service.

Chris Kitson, member of the PPG, told the Journal: “The lack of reliable trading hours are very worrying to residents who make a journey to Town to collect their medication only to find the shops closed or that their medications are not available as the staff have not had time to unpack the deliveries from the Lloyds central warehouse near Bristol. This unacceptable level of service is also placing our Medical Centre under additional strain as they have to deal with patient requests to try and help them obtain their medications.”

“The PPG fail to see why Lloyds insist upon running two pharmacies in the town, surely it would make sense to run one business effectively rather than two very poor There is little evidence of resource management or support to the clearly over stretched staff. The strain their staff are under is unfair as they are in the front line trying to achieve the impossible.”

Residents who wish to complain about the service email customer services@lloydspharmacy.co.uk or england.contactus@nhs.net starting the email with I wish to complain.

Simon Jupp’s reaction (to be contrasted with Richard Foord’s on unacceptable GP appointment waiting times)

Here is how Simon Jupp reacted a couple of weeks ago in his weekly press release:

First he outlines the problem

I have received quite a few emails recently about local pharmacies being closed at short notice or with long queues outside stores.

The problem has been particularly acute in Budleigh Salterton. I recently met with LloydsPharmacy, who run branches in the town and across East Devon.

He expresses shock at the issues raised, but they are not the ones that immediately spring to mind

I will be honest that the issues raised in the meeting really shocked me. Verbal abuse from customers has been cited as a contributing factor to three managers leaving a store in Budleigh over two months. Sadly, stores haven’t been able to open every day because there’s a national shortage of qualified staff and locum pharmacists and dispensers are not always available to make up the shortfall.

Pharmacies can’t dispense medicines without a pharmacist on site. Recruitment remains a struggle despite the offer of generous hourly rates and bonuses. The government has added pharmacists to the shortage occupation list to help recruitment from elsewhere. Training can take up to five years, depending on the role.

He recognises frustration with the “service” then passes the buck

I recognise that many of us will be frustrated when we don’t get the service we expect. But there’s no excuse to verbally abuse staff who are just doing their jobs. LloydsPharmacy assure me they are working hard to recruit new staff and will keep me updated with their progress.

Lastly, he indulges in a classic Tory diversionary and gratuitous attack on EDDC 

I have also received emails from residents concerned about the continued closure of Exmouth Town Hall and Blackdown House in Honiton. East Devon District Council closed both offices at the start of the pandemic with no firm plans announced to reopen them. It prompted several political groups to work cross-party on an open letter to the council calling for both offices to reopen. Funnily enough, I hear the leader was informed of the letter on Thursday and wasn’t best pleased, as you might possibly be able to tell from his column this week. It prompted a press release on Friday announcing that Exmouth Town Hall will reopen in December.

The time has come to also reopen their offices at Honiton for face-to-face support for visitors who turn up and may need help. It’s what council tax payers expect.

Bottom line: he fails to address the issue – another example of the broken NHS – Owl

Devon being ‘let down’ over GP appointment waiting times

Richard Foord MP comments on GP appointment waiting times.

To be contrasted with Simon Jupp MP’s approach to the additional problem the “old dears” in Budleigh are complaining of, their long wait in getting their medication dispensed. Not knowing if either of the two pharmacies are open, then sometimes having to queue in the cold outside. – Owl 

Lewis Clarke www.devonlive.com

A Devon MP has said people are being let down after revealing the ‘alarming number’ of patients waiting more than two weeks to see a GP. More than 140,000 patients across Devon waited more than two weeks to see a GP in September, new research by the Liberal Democrats has revealed.

This made up 20.2 per cent of all GP appointments, up from the 13.6 per cent of patients who waited more than two weeks to see their doctor in January. Across the country, over 5 million people waited more than two weeks for a GP appointment in September, making up 17.9 per cent of all GP visits.

Richard Foord MP has said the “alarming figures” show that patients in Tiverton & Honiton are being let down. It comes as Liberal Democrats have set out plans for patients to have a right to see their GP within a week, or within 24 hours if in urgent need.

The policy would enshrine this right in the NHS Constitution, putting a duty on the government and health service to make sure it happens. It would be achieved by increasing the number of GPs, fixing pension rules to prevent so many doctors retiring early, and increasing the number of nurses and pharmacists fully qualified to prescribe day to day medicines. The proposals were announced by Liberal Democrat Leader Ed Davey on a visit to Axminster Medical Practice this month.

Mr Foord said: “These alarming figures show our local health services are being run into the ground under this Conservative government. Behind these statistics are people across our part of Devon waiting for an appointment with worrying symptoms, with many are being seen too late. Visiting Axminster Medical Practice, I saw first-hand just how hard staff are working to support local people. The whole team are working flat out and their focus on same-day appointments is making a difference. However, it’s clear they’re overstretched.

“That’s why I am proud that Liberal Democrats have put forward a credible plan to ease the pressure on GP services and ensure everyone is seen within one week. It would serve to save our local health services and finally give people across our communities the fair deal they deserve. The government’s promises become ring hollow. The sad truth is they’re disinterested in improving our NHS and refuse to take action to pull it back from the brink. People here in Devon will pay the price if this government continues to take us for granted and sit on their hands”.

Sunak tries to pacify Brexiters but keeps door open to closer EU ties

Rishi Sunak has kept open the door to closer ties with the European Union but tried to pacify angry Brexiters in his own party by laying down a red line that the UK must remain free to set its own standards and regulation.

Aubrey Allegretti www.theguardian.com 

The UK prime minister tried to dampen down speculation that senior government figures were considering a “Swiss-style” deal with Brussels, which would require alignment, at least temporarily, on food and agriculture standards.

Reports of such a move riled senior members of the European Research Group of Conservative Brexiters and the health secretary, Steve Barclay, leading to an official denial being issued by Downing Street on Sunday afternoon.

Addressing the clamour for the first time, Sunak sought to stress his credentials as someone who campaigned for leave in the 2016 referendum, and talked up the need to unleash the “enormous benefits and opportunities” of Brexit.

He told business leaders at the annual Confederation of British Industry conference in Birmingham: “Under my leadership, the United Kingdom will not assume any relationship with Europe that relies on alignment with EU law …

“We need regulatory regimes that are fit for the future, that ensure that this country can be leaders in those industries that are going to create the jobs and the growth of that future. And having the regulatory freedom to do that is an important opportunity of Brexit.”

Sunak did still leave open the possibility of trying to reduce trade barriers with the EU, a major problem for businesses who face increased and costly bureaucracy as well as a shortage of workers after the end of freedom of movement. He did not deny the UK was seeking a closer relationship with Brussels to solve those issues.

Though he would not be drawn on whether the government would be prepared to grant more visas for skilled workers to fix labour shortages, Sunak said he wanted to stem the number of people being smuggled across the Channel.

He suggested it was vital to “rebuild public consent” before turning to the problems with “legal migration”, and he promised to reduce the number of people arriving on small boats, but did not say by how much or by when.

“If we’re doing that then I do believe that we can … win the global race for talent. And I’m unapologetic about wanting to deliver an immigration system which is highly competitive, for the best and the brightest. And that’s what we’ll deliver.”

Earlier, the CBI boss, Tony Danker, urged Sunak to solve the deadlock over the Northern Ireland protocol and resist retaining “anti-growth” barriers.

Danker said: “People are arguing against immigration, but it’s the only thing that’s increased our growth potential since March.” He added: “Let’s be honest, we don’t have the people we need, nor do we have the productivity.”

Lord Price, a former Tory trade minister who served immediately before and after the 2016 referendum, said that around that time he went to Switzerland “to try and understand how the Swiss over 30 years had built a relationship with the EU where they were in the single market but they still had sovereignty over their own law-making”.

He told BBC Radio 4: “I’ve always felt that if we weren’t going to rejoin the EU or become a member of the EEA, which means that we would have to adopt again all EU legislation, the Swiss model was the right way for us to go forward.”

Price said Switzerland had 120 bilateral agreements with the EU, built over 30 years, but he added: “To get to that you’ve got to start with a good relationship with the EU. We’ve got to stop being a noisy neighbour and we’ve got to start being a cooperative neighbour.”

Don’t worry – Simon will fix it!

UK restaurants are going bust at a faster rate than during the Covid crisis owing to a “toxic mix” of surging energy costs, staff shortages and falling bookings.

Championing the hospitality sector is Simon Jupp’s big mission, despite the fact that not until the “New Guard” took charge, did East Devon have a Tourism strategy.

So far he’s not been very effective. Amongst the mini budget reversals announced in the emergence statement, Jeremy Hunt cut the previously announced freeze on alcohol duty.

Simon is a bit of a flip-flopper, supporting Liz Truss’ unfunded tax breaks one week then Rishi Sunak’s austerity 2.0++ the next.

Kalyeena Makortoff http://www.theguardian.com 

Closures in the sector rose by 60%, with 1,567 insolvencies over 2021-22, up from 984 during 2020-21, according to a study by the advisory firm Mazars. The figure includes 453 over the past three months, up from 395 in the previous quarter.

“Insolvencies of restaurant businesses are now happening at a far faster rate than during Covid,” Rebecca Dacre, a partner at Mazars, said. “It is a very toxic mix of rising input costs, sharply rising finance costs and weak demand. Most restaurateurs have not seen this combination of negative factors before.”

Industry lobby groups including UK Hospitality and the British Beer and Pub Association said last month that more than a third of hospitality businesses could go bust by early 2023.

While the industry experienced a rebound in business this summer after a string of forced closures during Covid lockdown periods, restaurants are now struggling with surging inflation, which has not only increased the cost of energy, food and drinks, but meant their customers have less money to spend on going out.

Barclaycard recently reported that more than half of Britons were planning to cut down on essential spending, raising concerns about revenues from the Christmas period, when many businesses make the bulk of their profits.

Some firms are also struggling to recruit enough employees as post-Brexit rules on migration block EU citizens from working in the UK. This has contributed to higher wage inflation.

Mazars said the combined pressures were likely to spell a tough few months for the industry, despite the usually lucrative holiday period.

“The Christmas trading period is usually a bumper period for hospitality businesses. However, restaurants will be bracing themselves for a very tough winter and many face a real battle to keep afloat,” Dacre said. “There’s a certainty of further insolvencies if they don’t receive much more support from the government, but the chances of the government fully turning on the taps is low.”

Planning applications validated by EDDC for week beginning 7 November

Numbers of second homes in Devon continue to soar. East Devon second only to South Hams

2687 in East Devon one in every 23 properties!

Is this the market we are sacrificing green fields for? – Owl

Parts of Devon have the highest rates of second homes in the country. A total of 13,363 properties in Devon are classed as second homes, according to new research by Action on Empty Homes – an 11.2 per cent increase compared to 2021, when there were 12,019 such properties.

David Dubas-Fisher www.devonlive.com

These are homes that are unlived in, but are fully furnished. The numbers also include holiday lets like AirBnBs as well as “buy-to-leave” properties, which are purchased as investments that are left unoccupied in the expectation that their value will rise.

South Hams has the highest number of any local authority in the region, with a total of 3,947 – and 14.2 per cent increase from last year. It means that one in every 11 properties in South Hams is now either a second home or a long-term empty homes, the 4th highest rate in England.

Some 8.6 per cent of properties in the area are classed as second homes. Only the City of London (22.3 per cent), North Norfolk (9.8 per cent) and the Isles of Scilly (8.7 per cent) rank higher. East Devon has seen a 14.4 per cent increase in second homes in the past

In North Devon the rate of second homes or of long-term empty homes – a property that has been empty for more than six months, and doesn’t have a statutory exemption from council tax – is one in every 21 properties, while in East Devon it’s one in every 23, in Torridge it’s one in every 24, and in West Devon it’s one in every 34.

There are 3,828 LTEHs in our county according to Action on Empty Homes’ research. That’s up from 2,987 in 2021, an increase of 28.2 per cent.

Chris Bailey National Campaign Manager for Action on Empty Homes said: “After more than a decade of intense housing crisis it is shocking to see long-term empty homes in England rise to 257,331 – another 20,000 more wasted empties, while nearly 100,000 families are trapped in Temporary Accommodation, costing the nation one and a half billion pounds a year. This is good money wasted on often extremely poor quality housing. Homeless families need genuinely affordable lifetime homes.

“A new national empty homes programme is long overdue – the government needs to step up to the plate and offer funding and incentives to get these homes back into use. Long-term empties are a huge missed opportunity to invest in green retrofit and create new jobs.

“Continued growth in long-term empty homes while our housing crisis intensifies sends a clear message, we are failing to meet housing need and failing to make best use of our existing homes.”

Both West Devon and South Hams councils have declared housing a crisis. Due to a number of factors, including the lack of rented accommodation which is available for longer than six months, an excessive rise in house prices due to second home-owners, the conversion of properties to Airbnb’s and people moving into the District since the pandemic. South Hams District Council last Autumn said it has no choice but to declare a Housing Crisis.

Local Authority: Second homes 2022

South Hams: 3947

East Devon: 2687

North Devon: 1809

Teignbridge: 1320

Torridge: 1142

Plymouth UA: 1107

West Devon: 650

Exeter: 505

Mid Devon: 196

Tourism boss says we need to attract ‘friends’ not ‘effing emmets’

Tourism should be driven firstly by what the people want. it’s got to be sustainable and regenerative and not damaging.

This article is centred on Cornwall  but the message applies equally to Devon. – Owl 

Lee Trewhela www.cornwalllive.com

Although Visit Cornwall boss Malcolm Bell is retiring at the end of the year, he’s certainly not taking any prisoners. He told CornwallLive the future of tourism in the Duchy relies on attracting ‘friends’ and ‘guests’ and forgetting the ‘****ing emmets’.

In an interview with CornwallLive, he said: “In my mind, visitors fall into five unofficial categories – at one level you have friends, then you have guests, then you have tourists, then you have bloody tourists, then you have ****ing emmets. You can quote me on that. The challenge we have is to get the friends, guests and tourists, who get us. Then try and convert the bloody tourists, but forget the awkward people who are ‘why haven’t you got this?’, ‘why haven’t you got that?’ It’s about targeting the right people at the right time of year.”

Mr Bell, 67, made the comment – which he knows he’ll get in trouble for – while talking about the two summers of the pandemic, when Cornwall was swamped by tourists, many of whom were here begrudgingly because they couldn’t go abroad.

“Last year, in particular, should be a salutary note, like burning your fingers as a kid you learn not to do that again. It’s great having a good road system now but it does open us up, and the pandemic opened us up to things that were quite difficult to cope with.

“In the 1970s people were in Cornwall because they couldn’t afford a proper holiday and there were a lot of chips on shoulders, and we felt that again in those two years. It had come back around. Twenty-five years ago it was ‘the Westcountry’, 15 years ago it was ‘Devon and Cornwall’ and now ‘Cornwall’ is the Waitrose and Devon is the Sainsbury’s. We’ve really come up through. We made ourselves the place to be, but half the country went abroad. Once you stopped them going abroad, we ended up with people here who didn’t want to be here. It’s settled down again now.”

There is a certain irony that the proud Cornishman who has helmed our tourism sector, used to wear a hat bearing a slogan which wasn’t the most inviting to visitors.

He said: “My mother destroyed the photograph otherwise you could have had it, of me wearing a hat with ‘Go home emmet’ written on it. That was because in about 1976 I was walking through Falmouth and these wonderful young men from Birmingham asked me where the nearest Indian restaurant was. Naively, I answered the question correctly to the best of my knowledge at the time, which was Plymouth. That’s why there’s a dent in my nose. I think they thought I was taking the Michael. So I wasn’t very happy about visitors for a while.”

It’s fair to say that under his tenure at Visit Cornwall, since 2010, tourism in Cornwall has never been so successful … or controversial.

“People don’t like me saying this, but the rise in tourism has helped with Cornwall’s identity, not necessarily always for the good, I’ll admit that, but people know about Cornwall now. We’re not just part of the Westcountry. We’re not tagged to a strange place called Devon. I always say Devon is the nearest place to Heaven … keep going and you’ll find it, and Devon is short for Drive On.

“But now we have to tackle the problems of success. That’s why we have to learn from those two years.”

Mr Bell steps down from his post at the end of December, but will carry on in the background in a consultation role, working on a plan for regenerative and sustainable tourism. Negotiations are currently taking place to employ his successor.

He told me: “I’m finishing off a strategy and trying to get Cornwall Council to endorse it, which says that the new direction in tourism should be driven firstly by what the people of Cornwall want, the next thing is improving the jobs and career prospects, and it’s got to be sustainable and regenerative and not damaging. Even if that restricts the growth of the sector, it can stay like that for decades. If you have a year like we had before, we’ll just be busted. That’s the worst thing that can happen. There are businesses that disagree with me, most agree.

“We are lucky compared to a lot of places as we’ve got a lot of independent businesses rather than chains of multi-nationals, or businesses that are backed by venture capitalists, who want their money. Whereas down here, most people want to look after Cornwall.”

He is a passionate advocate for regenerative tourism which has the people of Cornwall at its heart.

“In ten years time, we – and I mean everyone in Cornwall including the council – should be controlling the stock and only having professional providers doing the right things, and there should be a career path for somebody who enters at base level to progress to the level they desire. We should prevent over-tourism. There should be regenerative tourism, such as businesses doing rewilding work, introducing bees, holding more community events.

“When it comes to events, the core audience should be locals first and what they want. Don’t create things just for staying visitors. That’s part of regenerative tourism, which helps the local community but still generates the money you need.”

What about that hot potato, a tourism tax?

“We’ve got to get the right balance of the cost of tourism and the cost of improving Cornwall in a fair and equitable way that is easy to administer, because we do get calls for a tourism tax. Thirty-three pence in the pound of a visitor’s spend goes to London, so in Cornwall that’s about £600-£700 million. There should be some form of mechanism to get the balance right.

“My view is why can’t there be a balance where we get 5% of all that VAT money back? At the moment when tourism booms, it’s Cornwall pain, Treasury gain. And why can’t we find mechanisms where visitors are happy to contribute? As soon as you say ‘tourism tax’, one lot cheer and one lot oppose it, and that’s not going to bring us together.”

Mr Bell believes the success of Cornwall’s tourism industry, while negating the impact it can have on those of us who live here, is to spread the visitor love outside the peak summer months.

“We would like to attract an extra 10% to 20% of people in January, February and March but no more in August. That extends the jobs we’ve got. I think the two months we’ll never crack are November and January. February you’ve got half-term, so if you get it going in March to the end of October, staff will be kept on. So full-time employment in the sector would be around nine-and-a-half months.

“That’s why we’ve got to look at what we’re calling the Cornwall Evergreen, which is culture, restaurants, the heritage, the wildlife. I know dogs on beaches is a contentious issue, but if you’ve got a dog and you want to go somewhere in the winter, sandy paws are preferable to muddy paws. There are little markets and niches. Another area is attracting the business market to do their planning and reviews between October and March, so come down and do some actual blue sky thinking.

“The new website, which will be finished before I go, is Cornwall For All Seasons and is mainly designed to say what’s best about Cornwall outside the main peak. Not being funny, but any tourist board boss normally when they get TV and film coverage in their area gets excited, but in the last two years it’s been like London buses in Cornwall. It’s the same stuff – it doesn’t feature the areas that we’d like, such as south east Cornwall. It doesn’t actually show what it’s like to live here.”

How has this year been compared to the manic summers of 2020/21, when hospitality staff were at breaking point?

“This year has been quieter than 2019, ironically – the spring was quiet and then the attractions suffered a lot because it was so warm. If it’s 19 degrees you stay on the beach for three hours, but when it’s 25 you stay on it all day, every day.

“There have been too many people thinking they could get too much money like the two years before. It did give us a reputation for being too expensive, which is ridiculous. Value for quality is one thing, but ripping people off is a completely different thing. Sensible businesses – and there are plenty of them – didn’t overegg it. You nurture a customer for life, you don’t rip them off and expect them to come back. But those who did are now the ones who are suffering.”

What would he say to people who argue Cornwall shouldn’t be so reliant on tourism?

“I’m all for it. If you get a broader economy, with other sectors in Cornwall such as the space industry, you get more people who will go out and eat and drink, and it won’t be a seasonal thing. Though I would say to anybody, I don’t know anywhere in the world that’s attractive and on the periphery and doesn’t rely in varying degrees on tourism.

“Cornwall is a really strong brand now, but we want that expanded into all the other sectors too. If we could have a more balanced economy, that would be brilliant. If tourism in its size didn’t grow, but other sectors did – what’s wrong with that?”

He believes some radical changes have to be made, such as compulsory registration for everyone offering holiday accommodation at whatever level.

“The population in Cornwall when I started working was 250,000 and now it’s 550,000, which is why we’re pushing for compulsory registration and, I think the next thing is, planning permission if you’re going to rent out your property as a holiday let. You’ve got to be registered and have planning permission.

“I tried to bait Gordon Ramsay, but he wouldn’t take it, on Radio 5 Live. In the south of France if you’re a millionaire second home owner, you’re persuaded to buy a couple of houses to rent for local people. I tried to bait Gordon Ramsay into agreeing to buy a couple of houses to rent to up-and-coming chefs. We could do with a bit more of that philanthropic balance.”

Mr Bell, whose family go back centuries in Cornwall, said of his retirement: “A couple of years ago I was thinking of stepping down until a strange thing called Covid came along. This year was mainly spent settling things down, but I thought I can’t hang around as there will be another crisis in a minute … and there is one.”

He was brought up on Malabar estate in Truro, with one set of grandparents living on the Trelander estate on the other side of the city and his other grandparents at Hendra Vean in Truro. He attended Bosvigo School and then Treyew School in the city – “I used to go sleep every afternoon and the school inspector was called to my mother, and they asked why I was going to sleep all the time, and I said no one told me I couldn’t!”

He added: “I did rubbish for a few years, failed the 11-plus, went to Penwethers Secondary Modern – which became Richard Lander, I wasn’t bright enough to go to the grammar school. I attended Camborne Tech then did nuclear physics and computing at Manchester Poly, which was partly driven by meeting a girl from the north and partly by let’s see a city.”

A career in the civil service saw him return to Cornwall in a host of jobs, including one with the sexy title of work related non advanced further education funding manager. After undertaking an economic study of tourism in Devon and Cornwall in the mid-1990s, Mr Bell got a job with the Westcountry Tourist Board, which then turned into South West Tourism, and in 2010, after council unification, he was employed as chief executive of Visit Cornwall, which after losing its Cornwall Council funding continued as a CIC.

He said: “Tourism is not a statutory responsibility – when I arrived, the budget for Visit Cornwall was £2m and they took half a million off that for the One Cornwall project and then all the austerity cuts started hitting. Understandably when it comes to social care and children, why can’t tourism look after itself as it’s a big industry? Why was the taxpayer paying for it?”

Mr Bell says it’s a difficult job and wishes his successor well. He certainly gets a bit of stick from people on social media.

“I’m glad my mum’s gone, she would have got upset, and my dad would have got angry. I was taught by my father to have acute hearing but thick skin. So I listen to it and if it’s reasonable, regardless of how it comes across, I take it on board.”

He added that Visit Cornwall has had some brilliant and bizarre complaints in recent times. “People have complained St Ives doesn’t look right because the water’s out, someone said they drove over an hour from the north coast to the south coast to find the tide was in there as well, and ‘when I came last year the beach was big but now it’s small, you should tell people that the tide comes in’.”

Mr Bell told me: “My old geography teacher used to say to us, ‘crack on or you’ll end up working in tourism’.” He’s certainly made a good crack of it, even if his teacher wouldn’t approve.

Health Secretary Refuses To Acknowledge NHS Delays Could Be Causing Deaths

Health Secretary Steve Barclay has said delays to ambulance services had created a “material risk” for patients, but did not explicitly acknowledge concerns that long waits were contributing to patient deaths.

www.politicshome.com (Sunday)

Barclay has this morning faced pressure to address urgent concerns by NHS leaders that people have died while waiting for ambulances to arrive.

Deborah Lee, chief executive of Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and Andew Cox, a senior coroner in Cornwall, have both raised the alarm in recent days about the impact of ambulance waits. According to The Sunday Times, Cox has written to Barclay outlining his damning assessment of repeated cases of patients he believes have died as a result of delays, and demanded action. 

Speaking on the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, Barclay said he was “aware” of the concerns and that he was looking at the issue “extremely closely”.  

But he repeatedly refused to acknowledge whether record-high waiting times for paramedics could be contributing to deaths.

“If there is a delay in an ambulance getting to someone in terms of unmet need, and obviously, that is a material risk,” Barclay said.

“That is why it is so important that we get the flow in terms of those handover delays. About a fifth of the delay is due to what happens in hospitals itself.

He continued: “The primary cause of the delays, the biggest factor, has been delays in domiciliary care and residential homes.

In October, only 70 per cent of patients were seen within four hours in all A&E departments, the worst performance reported since the target was introduced.

The number of people waiting for non-urgent hospital treatment also hit a record-high in September, with 7.07m on the list.

Twitter link here

Barclay told the BBC that many of the delays in the NHS were due to the effects of the pandemic, and a lack of social care places delaying the discharge of people from hospital.

He defended the government’s decision to delay plans to cap lifetime social care costs at £86,000 until 2025, despite the reform originally being intended to come into effect in 2023.

“It’s a very difficult decision to delay those reforms. We remain committed to them,” he said. 

“But we recognise it as an immediate issue, particularly in hospitals where we got 30,500 people who are ready to discharge, but we are not able to do so. That is having a knock on effect in areas like ambulances and the flow through hospitals.”

He highlighted that the government had pledged an extra £2.3bn for the next two years for the NHS as part of plans announced in the Autumn Statement this week.

Shadow health secretary Wes Streeting dismissed Barclay’s claims that the pandemic was a leading cause of the current delays in NHS services, and highlighted the longer-term backlog. 

“Steve Barclay back to the discredited Conservative script claiming that Conservative NHS backlogs are Covid backlogs,” Streeting tweeted on Sunday morning.

“But we went INTO the pandemic with NHS waiting lists ALREADY at a RECORD 4.5 MILLION.

“The longer the Conservatives are in power the longer patients will wait.”

Labour has pledged to significantly increase NHS staffing, paid for by abolishing non-dom tax exemption. 

Despite an increase in funding announced by Chancellor Jeremy Hunt this week, the NHS is facing unprecedented strikes this winter, with Royal College of Nursing (RCN) members going on strike for the first time.

Barclay said his “door is open” for negotiations with the RCN and other unions, whom he met with earlier this week to discuss their demands, which include better working conditions and a pay rise of 5% above inflation.

But RCN general secretary and chief executive Pat Cullen said on Thursday that those meetings had failed to solve the issues relating to the strike and were not meaningful negotiations. 

“I must not let my members, nor the public confuse these meetings for serious discussions on the issues of NHS pay and patient safety,” she said in a letter to members.

“There is only value in meeting if you wish to discuss – in formal, detailed negotiations – the issues that have caused our members to vote for strike action.”

Barclay said on Sunday that the government had “respected” the independent pay review body’s recommendations on pay, and highlighted that other areas of the public sector were having pay freezes.

Responding Barclay’s comments, the RCN’s Pat Cullen said the health secretary’s “lack of intention and inability to see the urgency of this situation will trouble every nurse”.

“Just an hour after we again urged him to come to the negotiating table to have detailed, formal discussions on pay and patient safety, he showed no signs of doing so.

“He has finally admitted what we’ve been saying about years of neglect, underinvestment and, as a result, underperformance, but that is not enough.

Cullen added that in this “key week for health and care” the sector needed ministers to “be bold and adopt a radical new position with serious investment in nursing”.

“If governments don’t follow Nicola Sturgeon’s lead in Scotland, we will announce strike dates in December for the rest of the UK,” she added.

Posh Devon hotel to create plush staff quarters with sea views

Devon’s luxury Burgh Island Hotel has bought a care home in order to transform it into some of the best staff accommodation in the UK. Korniloff care home in Bigbury-on-Sea will be converted to the tune of £500,000 into living quarters for staff, complete with large gardens, sea views and ample space for relaxation including a gym.

Daniel Clark www.devonlive.com

Korniloff will take six months to complete and will provide 22 high end ensuite double bedrooms when finished. The provision of such quality staff accommodation will ensure that Burgh continues to attract and keep the best staff; bucking the trend of some hospitality venues, which find it hard to find staff.

This is not the first project Burgh has undertaken to provide staff with accommodation. In 2018 as the hotel expanded, Burgh bought Warren Cottage in Bigbury-on-Sea to help staff who were based further away from the island. As business continued to grow, often fully booked, it was clear that additional staff accommodation was needed.

Burgh had been interested in buying Korniloff for the past few years, but it only recently became available. Korniloff was originally built as a hotel in the early part of the last century and the intention is to give staff living quarters that match those on the island.

Giles Fuchs, owner of Burgh Island Hotel, said: “Since I bought the hotel, we have always tried to provide suitable accommodation for our staff, which is challenging given its location on a tidal island, so I am delighted to announce the purchase of Korniloff. Once renovated it will allow us to provide our hard-working and highly valued staff with a very high standard of accommodation. Our success over the past few years would not have been possible without them so it is very much deserved.

“South Hams is very expensive both in terms of rent and house prices, which makes it difficult for people to pursue a career in hospitality at the Burgh Island Hotel. Through providing quality accommodation, we hope to attract and retain the best hospitality talent to help give them a good quality of life and ensure that our guest enjoy the best experience while staying with us.”

At the height of summer, when over six million tourists flock to Devon’s magnificent coast, Burgh employs almost 100 members of staff to run, maintain and deliver its first-class service to guests throughout the hotel. In return the Burgh’s owners want to make sure that the staff have equally great accommodation to look after their wellbeing and happiness.

With only 16 staff bedrooms currently on the island and, given its remote location where access is controlled by the tide, it’s important that staff can live nearby. Burgh’s purchase of Korniloff is a move to shield employees from rising house prices and increasingly unaffordable rents, allowing them to focus on their roles at the hotel and progress their careers.

In 2022, amongst the 29 local authorities in the Southwest, South Hams recorded the highest property price rise, increasing by an average of 24.3%. Average house prices are now over £400,000 as the area becomes a popular destination for second homes and summer holidays.

It comes as plans for the huge expansion of the plush Devon hotel to meet a boom in visitor numbers and make it ‘the best hotel west of the Ritz’ are still under consideration by South Hams District Council planners. The aspiration for Burgh to be the ‘best hotel west of the Ritz’, and the scheme includes developing rooftop rooms which would rank among the country’s most sought after settings, as well as provide a new bar to allow for new guests and to allow casually dressed visitors to be split from those in 1930’s costume.

Proposals for the ambitious new development have prioritised respect for the island’s unique setting, and preserve the glamour of Roaring ‘20s for guests. An additional 15 hotel rooms in addition to the 25 already would be planned to be built, as well as 11 rooms of accommodation for staff, while a Glazed extension and first floor terrace over the Pilchard Inn, with the reinstatement of the café selling Cream Teas to rear.

The hotel, built on a private island in the South Hams in 1929, is famous for its art deco design, the sea tractor that brings guests from the mainland, and former guests such as Agatha Christie and the Beatles.

Britain mulls Swiss-style ties with Brussels

Senior government figures are planning to put Britain on the path towards a Swiss-style relationship with the European Union.

The move, intended to forge closer economic ties, is likely to infuriate hardline Conservative Brexiteers.

Caroline Wheeler, Harry Yorke, Tim Shipman www.thetimes.co.uk

Jeremy Hunt, the chancellor, last week signalled that Rishi Sunak’s administration intends to break from the approach adopted by Boris Johnson and remove the vast majority of trade barriers with the bloc.

In private, senior government sources have suggested that pursuing frictionless trade requires moving towards a Swiss-style relationship over the next decade. However, they insist this would not extend to a return to freedom of movement.

“It’s obviously something the EU would never offer us upfront because they would say you are trying to have your cake and eat it but the reason I think we will get it is because it is overwhelmingly in the businesses interests on both sides,” one said.

Switzerland has access to the European single market through a series of bilateral agreements.

However, the model also involves more liberal EU migration, and payments to the EU budget, with the bloc in recent years also pushing for the European Court of Justice to have greater oversight in the relationship. The Swiss have frequently debated restricting free movement from the bloc, but in the most recent referendum opted to keep it.

These are all red lines for members of the rebellious European Research Group.

It was also an approach that Johnson and Lord Frost, his chief Brexit negotiator, ruled out when they drew up the UK’s negotiating mandate in 2020.

Ministers are confident that the EU’s approach to relations with the UK is thawing as the continent faces the challenges caused by soaring inflation and the conflict in Ukraine.

“I think we will be doing everything we can proactively within our power to make changes to improve things when it comes to the EU,” one source said.

“The bigger picture on this is the EU seeing something which they weren’t expecting, which is massive support for European security from the UK with respect to Ukraine and they can see we are serious about being sensible grownups with the biggest military in Europe doing our bit.

“I think there is a very good way through this with more trust that we were ever going to have with either Boris Johnson or Liz Truss.”

The Tory Brexiteers are fiercely opposed to any move that risks returning the UK closer to the EU’s regulatory orbit.

Last night Frost said: “Any approach requiring the UK to align with EU rules to get trade benefits, whether as part of a Swiss-style approach or any other, would be quite unacceptable. Boris Johnson and I fought very hard to avoid any such requirements in 2020 and ensure the UK could set its own laws, and we should not contemplate giving this away in future.”

Speaking on Radio 4’s Today programme earlier this week, Hunt rejected the prospect of rejoining the single market but backed working to strengthen Britain’s relationship with Brussels.

He said: “I think having unfettered trade with our neighbours and countries all over the world is very beneficial to growth. I have great confidence that over the years ahead we will find, outside the single market, we are able to remove the vast majority of the trade barriers that exist between us and the EU.”

One rebel said they feared “unfettered trade” sounded eerily similar to the ill-fated Chequers deal drawn up by Theresa May in 2018.

The Labour Party, while ruling out rejoining the single market and customs union, have stated there are elements of Johnson’s Brexit deal that can be “fixed.” This includes a veterinary agreement with Brussels – helping to smooth issues with the Northern Ireland Protocol – and a deal which would see both sides recognise one another’s professional qualifications.

There are also mounting concerns in the ERG that the government is preparing to give ground to Brussels to resolve the disagreement over the Northern Ireland protocol.

Insiders have said a deal could see the EU drop most of its checks on goods passing between Great Britain and Northern Ireland if the UK takes a less ideological position on the role of the European Court of Justice in Northern Ireland.

But doing so would lead the group to try to “bring down the government”, warned one senior member.

The Brexiteers Chris Heaton-Harris and Steve Baker are ministers in the Northern Ireland Office and are working on a deal with Brussels.

But it is understood that warnings have been sent to Downing Street that it is the EU, not the UK, which must give ground on the ECJ. Similar warnings have been passed to the German embassy.

“Just because people like Mark Francois have not been going on about the ECJ does not mean that they have changed their view,” said an informed source. “They would rather bring down the government than accept the supremacy of a foreign court over any territory of the UK.”

A Downing Street source said Sunak was “taking the fight” to the EU but was also hopeful that a more constructive approach on both sides could bear fruit.

“Rishi wants to get this sorted as quickly as possible; there’s definitely a deal to be done,” a No 10 source said. “It’s our team’s sense that there is much more of a landing zone, in terms of what we would be happy with, than there has ever been.”

But they added: “He’s taking the fight to them. He’s not going to be giving up stuff that he and the party would not be happy with him giving up.”

Keir Starmer: I will abolish House of Lords to ‘restore trust in politics’

Keir Starmer will abolish the House of Lords and replace it with a new elected chamber as part of plans to “restore trust in politics”, the Observer understands.

Michael Savage www.theguardian.com 

In a sweeping constitutional overhaul, the Labour leader has told the party’s peers that he wants to strip politicians of the power to make appointments to the Lords as part of the first-term programme of a Labour government. Starmer said that the public’s faith in the political system had been undermined by successive Tory leaders handing peerages to “lackeys and donors”.

It is understood that Labour will hold a consultation on the composition and size of a new chamber as well as immediate reforms to the current appointments process. Final proposals will be included in the party’s next election manifesto.

It comes after a series of rows over peerages. Boris Johnson made a number of controversial appointments, including his friend Evgeny Lebedev, who owns the Evening Standard. He is expected to appoint political allies and junior aides as part of a forthcoming list.

Meanwhile, Liz Truss is also said to be planning a resignation list of new peers despite a disastrous leadership that lasted just seven weeks.

In a meeting last week, Starmer told Labour peers that there was now strong support for reform of the Lords, both across party lines and among the public. He outlined “some very clear principles” for reform, including that any new chamber should be elected by voters rather than appointed by politicians.

“I want to be clear that we do need to restore the trust of the public in every part of the United Kingdom in our system of government,” he said. “House of Lords reform is just one part of that … People have lost faith in the ability of politicians and politics to bring about change – that is why, as well as fixing our economy, we need to fix our politics.”

He added that it should be “truly representative” of the UK’s nations and regions, meaning it should have a clear role in safeguarding devolution. However, he also said that his proposals would ensure it should not replace any of the functions of the House of Commons, remaining a second chamber charged with amending and scrutinising legislation. The Commons would retain exclusive powers over the public finances and the formation of governments.

The proposals will also set out much stronger devolved powers, as part of a review of Britain’s constitutional arrangements overseen by Gordon Brown, the former prime minister.

Starmer told party peers on Wednesday that he regarded reforming the Lords as a critical part of his agenda aimed at “promoting inclusive growth and restoring trust in politics”. While he said that they would continue to play a “vital role” in the campaign to win the next election, reform was needed to show the public that Labour would provide a fresh start after a series of Tory scandals.

He pointed to Johnson’s recent use of his power to appoint peers as showing the need for reform. He said Johnson’s plans to reward “lackeys and donors” made him the latest in a long line of Tory prime ministers who have played party politics with the Lords and ridden roughshod over the appointments system: “We should be rebuilding trust in politics, but this can’t just be an article of faith – we need to show how we will do things differently. Reforming our second chamber has to be a part of that.”

Johnson has recently handed a peerage to Michael Hintze, a leading Tory donor, and previously awarded one to Lebedev. He is now said to be planning to hand more to the ultra-loyal MPs Nadine Dorries, the former culture secretary, and Nigel Adams, a former Cabinet Office minister and longtime supporter.

Johnson’s resignation honours list, which has not yet been announced, is also said to include his advisers Ross Kempsell, 30, and Charlotte Owen, a former assistant to Johnson believed to be in her late 20s.

Starmer had pledged to abolish the Lords as part of his leadership campaign, and to “replace it with an elected chamber of regions and nations”. Doubts were later raised about his commitment to the promise after he abandoned other elements of his leadership pitch. However, it is understood he now sees reform of the Lords as necessary to demonstrate that Labour would represent a decisive change from the Conservatives.

Starmer’s comments suggest that he is backing many of the ideas drawn up by Brown’s review. It is understood to support replacing the Lords with an upper house of nations and regions. It is also said to have backed a new round of devolution, including handing new economic and taxation powers to new independent councils of the nations and for England. Brown wants local mayors to have more power over education, transport and research funding.

During the meeting with peers, Starmer also made clear that he wanted to reposition Labour as “pro-business, pro-growth and can offer Britain a bright future”, adding: “We will be out there showing the public that there is a different way to this failed Tory economics … Britain has so much potential. Labour will harness it so we can lead the world again.

Labour has already announced that Starmer backs banning MPs from carrying out paid consultancy work as a way of improving ethical standards. He would also replace the ministerial code with an updated code of conduct. The party’s plans appear to include an entirely elected second chamber, but the details of the reforms have not yet been agreed.

The last big attempt to reform the Lords came under the coalition government led by David Cameron. Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader and deputy prime minister, eventually had to abandon the plans in the wake of a humiliating Tory rebellion. His proposals would have seen 80% of peers elected and the total number of members cut to 450.

Simon Jupp supports Chancellor’s Autumn Statement (would he do otherwise?)

Rejoice, rejoice, just rejoice at the news!

Be grateful that our fourth Chancellor in three months has ensured that the economy is just totally Sunakered and not completely Trussterfucked. (To quote loosely from two sources).

Our PPS’s enthusiasm for swinging in behind the Tory economic wrecking-ball shows no bounds. – Owl

Simon Jupp MP has backed tax rises and other measures revealed in Chancellor Jeremy Hunt’s Autumn Statement on Thursday (17 November).

The East Devon MP previously supported major tax cuts in former chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng’s mini-budget in September.

exmouth.nub.news

Mr Jupp described the decisions in the Autumn Statement, which also include spending cuts, as “tough but fair” and they would “restore economic stability and tackle inflation.”

He said in a statement: “Like many countries around the world, the UK is facing profound economic challenges – Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine and the Covid pandemic have cost our country billions.

“I wanted to touch on some of the headline matters today, based on the issues raised with me in recent constituency surgeries and correspondence.

“The state pension will rise in line with inflation – 10.1 per cent. I have repeatedly emphasised with the Prime Minister and Chancellor the importance of restoring the triple lock to help protect pensioners’ spending power because it offers vital economic security for many people in East Devon.

“The standard minimum income guarantee in pension credit will also increase in line with inflation from April 2023. Additionally, I also spoke with the Chancellor regarding benefits. Today, he announced that working age and disability benefits will rise by inflation, supporting the most vulnerable. 

“I am particularly pleased to learn that there will now be £4.4 billion of additional funding for schools over the next two years. I have spoken with several East Devon school heads in recent weeks to raise their concerns about recruitment and funding with the Secretary of State for Education. The extra money will help schools locally and I will continue to work with education leaders across East Devon.

“I know there has been some uncertainty about the government’s energy bill support beyond April 2023. We now know that the government will extend the energy price guarantee for twelve months until April 2024, although at a higher level of £3,000 per year for the average household. This will come alongside direct support for 8 million low-income households. 

“The government will also double to £200 the level of support for households that use heating oil and liquified petroleum gas to heat their homes. Many residents in particularly rural parts of East Devon told me the £100 initially announced some months ago wasn’t enough. I agreed and made the case for an increase.

“I believe it’s right that those with more contribute more. Two policies stand out in this regard: the point at which the highest earners start paying the top rate of tax will be lowered from £150,000 to £125,140; and energy firms will pay an expanded windfall tax of 35%, up from the 25% already levied on their profits. 

“Thanks to the action taken today, our borrowing costs are broadly back in line with comparable countries. Although we will now see some tax increases, the Chancellor has not raised headline rates of taxation, and tax as a percentage of GDP will increase by just 1% over the next five years. 

“Today’s Autumn Statement protects those on the lowest income, restores economic stability, and tackles inflation.”

 

Jeremy Hunt put vital social care reforms on hold – and failed Britain’s most vulnerable people 

Andrew Dilnot is warden of Nuffield College, Oxford, and was chair of the Commission on the Funding of Care and Support www.theguardian.com 

Dementia. Chronic lung disease or arthritis. Loss of mobility, sight, hearing. These are all things that could hit any of us, make us vulnerable and require compassion and social care. The chancellor said his statement on Thursday was about protecting vulnerable people and displaying the value of compassion. So how can a part of that statement have been yet another occasion when social care has been put at the bottom of the list of priorities?

I chaired the commission appointed by the coalition government in 2010 to suggest a way forward. My name was read out in Jeremy Hunt’s statement on Thursday, which breached the 2019 manifesto promise to “fix social care” by delaying the improved funding system I recommended from October 2023 to a (post-general election) date of October 2025.

In September 2021, the then government announced a package of changes to social care funding. There were three main elements. First, an increase in the generosity of the means-tested system, so that instead of needing to be down to your last £23,250 (including property) before you got any help from the state, you would get state help if your assets were worth less than £100,000. Second, a change to the way care is charged for, which would end individual care users subsidising local authorities. And third, a cap on the lifetime amount that you would have to pay, which meant that for the first time ever, the risk of needing social care would be pooled across the whole of society rather than borne by whoever happened to be hit. It would have moved our treatment of people with social care needs closer to the way we deal with medical needs in the NHS.

Since then, hundreds of thousands of families in vulnerable and difficult circumstances have been looking forward to October next year. The announcement on Thursday broke the pledge in the manifesto, and laid out in parliament, and now these families are being told they will have to wait until October 2025. Without these reforms, individuals and families facing the possibility of long social care journeys are left entirely on their own, with the state only helping once their assets – including their homes – have dwindled down to the threshold.

This is not the first time those needing social care have been let down. When Labour came to power in 1997 it pledged to address social care funding reform. There was a royal commission, but nothing happened. The 2010 coalition government set up an independent commission, which I chaired, and which reported in 2011. We recommended reforms similar in structure to those that have now been deferred, albeit with the cap set at a lower level. In 2013, the government legislated, with implementation due in April 2017. Before the 2015 election, the implementation date was brought forward to 2016. Immediately after the 2015 election, it was deferred by a year and then abandoned. Nothing happened.

Then there was a plan for a green paper. Nothing happened. Then there was a plan in the 2017 manifesto, which was abandoned during the campaign. Nothing happened. Then there was another plan for a green paper. Nothing happened. Then Boris Johnson on his first day in office said he had a plan. There was the 2021 announcement, followed by legislation agreed by both houses of parliament and an implementation date of October 2023. Hope grew. If this latest announcement is not reversed, we will again have a whole parliament during which … nothing will have happened.

The way we treat those in need of social care is a strong indicator of how we care about the most vulnerable people. This group has been denied the sharing of risk that we apply most strikingly in the National Health Service, but also through our wider social security system. Just over a year ago, a promise was made to these people by the prime minister. To break that promise now is not only backing out of protecting vulnerable people, but it’s also taking away something on which they were relying.

This is a time for looking to the founding of the modern British welfare state and asking why the principles that apply across so much of it are not applied to social care. In 1943 Winston Churchill said that he and his colleagues were strong partisans of national insurance “for all classes for all purposes from the cradle to the grave”, recognising that social insurance brings “the magic of averages to the rescue of the millions”. That Churchillian insight, shared by William Beveridge and Nye Bevan, is just as true now as it was then, and the glaring omission in our social welfare arrangements is social care. The reforms due to have been implemented next October would have begun to set that right. The delay hurts not only the most vulnerable, but also the carers, formal and informal, who help to support them. Social care is something we have to do together. Making this group wait yet again seems hard to defend. Can we really not do better than this?