Massive fire breaks out at derelict holiday camp

A fire has broken out at the derelict Seaton Heights site. Fire crews from across the South West have been sent to the scene on Monday following the major blaze which has broken out.

Chloe Parkman www.devonlive.com

The A3052 Harepath Hill in Seaton is currently shut both ways from Seaton turn off to Barnards Hill Lane. More than a dozen fire crews are on the scene.

Six fire engines, one water carrier, one command unit and three fire officers on scene, with one water carrier, one aerial ladder platform and one welfare unit also in attendance. Pictures from the scene show flames and smoke billowing from the former holiday camp.

A Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service spokesperson said: “Fire Control received several reports of a fire in the Harepath Hill area of Seaton at 4.19pm. Crews from Seaton, Colyton and Lyme Regis (DWFRS) was mobilised.

“After a short while, crews requested the attendance of a Water Carrier which was mobilised from Bridport (DWFRS). At 4.26pm – Crews confirmed that smoke and flames were issuing and requested for a 4th appliance to attend, and the fire engine from Otter St Mary was mobilised.

“At 4.56pm crews requested the attendance of additional 2 fire engines and 1 aerial ladder platform – 2x fire engines from Sidmouth and aerial ladder platform from Danes Castle was mobilised. Crews are at work with 2x breathing apparatus, 1x main jet and 1x safety jet.

“At 5.10pm crews request the attendance of a second water carrier – this was mobilised from Torquay. At 5.37pm, xix fire engines, one water carrier, one command unit and three fire officers on scene, with one water carrier, one aerial ladder platform and one welfare unit also in attendance.”

Once a popular holiday resort, the hotel complex has been left empty and dilapidated since its closure in 2005. The future of the he derelict site has become a long-running concern in the town as several planning applications have either been refused, withdrawn or fallen through after received permission.

Plans from applicants Lyme Bay Leisure Ltd to replace the existing hotel complex with 42 two-storey, detached holiday homes, along with an office, cafe with terrace and parking, and self-catering accommodation on the first floor above this, are currently under consideration by East Devon District Council.

Seaton Hospital: have your say on Friday 3 November

Public meeting 1:30 Colyford Memorial Hall

Richard Foord MP

Dr Mark Welland Hospital League of Friends

Cllr Paul Arnott, Leader EDDC

Jack Rowland

Cllr Marcus Hartnell, EDDC and Devon County councillor

Chair Martin Shaw

ICB and NHS Property Services have been invited

Planning applications validated by EDDC for week beginning October

Regional inequality in Britain is worse than ever

Ed Balls and Dan Turner www.thetimes.co.uk 

It is rare that Gordon Brown and George Osborne agree when it comes to economic policy. Students of 1990s politics might think the same of Tony Blair and John Major. But when all four former prime ministers and chancellors concede that widening regional inequality is a startling collective failure of British politics, it’s time for their successors to take note.

Despite all the promises of “levelling up”, Britain’s regions are further apart than ever. But we shouldn’t be surprised that the government hasn’t delivered: Britain has been failing at regional policy for more than 40 years. If anything we’ve gone backwards. The gap between southeast England and the rest of the UK is now wider than that between east and west Germany or northern and southern Italy — that’s not hyperbole but statistical fact.

What has gone wrong and what needs to change? To answer that we’ve interviewed 93 politicians and practitioners with six decades of experience. Cut through their differences over rail lines or elected mayors and there is broad agreement on the big picture: time and again, incoming administrations have announced a new regional policy and torn up what went before, only for the next set of leaders to switch approach again.

All this chop and change has been disastrous. New approaches on skills, transport or planning have never been given time to bed in before being uprooted. Alongside distrust of local government, inadequate infrastructure investment and a persistent bias in innovation spending towards the southeast, no wonder the UK has continued to grow apart.

The good news is that these two generations of past politicians are now urging the present one to learn from their mistakes. Regional inequality matters more for politics than it has for a century. We have a new cadre of mayors and devolved administrations giving central government the confidence it needs to let go. With sustained backing from No 10 and the Treasury, change is possible.

What we need is a cross-party plan that our leaders can stick to. It won’t be easy. There will be tough debates about how we pay for it, and how we prevent new inequalities opening up between towns and cities, or city-regions and the countryside.

But our unprecedented set of candid interviews should be a wake-up call for Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer. We have an opportunity to build a lasting consensus that can weather political change and make our economy grow faster and more fairly across all regions. Are our leaders brave and far-sighted enough to seize it?

Ed Balls is a former cabinet minister; Dan Turner is policy adviser to the South Yorkshire mayor. All 93 interviews, plus summary, can be found at sites.harvard.edu/uk-regional-growth/

Torquay seafront set to undergo massive transformation

The project has been made possible after the council secured £21.9million of Town Deal Funding from the government, and it is about to announce the ‘household’ name of the development partner who will help to spend it….

…Business owners have been given a first look at the detailed proposals.”

Is this the latest in a sequence of seafront regeneration projects insufficiently thought through to endure? 

Owl recalls something called “living coasts”, the abandoned Torquay aquarium project opened in 2003 but closed in 2020. Living Coasts was built on the site of the Coral Island Leisure Complex which closed in 1977. Coral Island itself replaced the Victorian coastal attraction called the Marine Spa, which opened in the 1800s.

Guy Henderson www.devonlive.com

A new statue of Agatha Christie will provide the finishing touch to a £4million transformation of Torquay harbourside. The statue, currently being created by artist Elisabeth Hadley, will show the Torquay-born Queen of Crime overlooking her beloved harbour as part of a development Torbay Council calls ‘momentous.’

Business owners have been given a first look at the detailed proposals, at a presentation attended by deputy council leader Chris Lewis (Con, Preston).

Work will begin almost immediately, and by this time next year the Strand will be home to a wide pedestrian boulevard, with buses banished and traffic squeezed into a single carriageway rather than the existing double.

“The whole place will be transformed,” said Cllr Lewis. “This has been on the cards for a long time, and it will make the area down by the harbour a really attractive place for residents, businesses and holidaymakers.”

Montel Civil Engineering will carry out the work in four phases, and Torbay Council is warning that the busy Strand which runs along the front of the former debenhams building will have to be closed completely for eight weeks next spring. It says disruption will be reduced as much as possible.

Cllr Lewis went on: “It is going to create a real promenade going along to the harbour. The whole of this part of Torquay is going to be regenerated and it will be a fantastic place to visit. We’ve got the money, we’ve got the partner, now we just need to get on with the job.”

Vince Flower, Chair of Torquay Town Deal Board said; “As a board we’ve been committed to driving forward change in Torquay. Work starting on this project is a significant milestone in delivering the Town Investment Plan – which ultimately is about creating a town centre that we can all be proud of and is fit for the future. Once this project is completed it is going to deliver a range of benefits to residents, visitors, and businesses.”

The project which has been made possible after the council secured £21.9million of Town Deal Funding from the government, and it is about to announce the ‘household’ name of the development partner who will help to spend it.

The phases of the work are:

Phase 1 – November to December 2023

Traffic reduced to a single lane running in both directions along the Strand.

Removal and re-construction of the central islands. This includes the removal of all traffic lights and pedestrian crossings.

Relocation of taxi ranks, bus stops, and temporary bus stops being introduced.

Contractor site compound set up on the footway outside of the Pavilion.

Phase 2 – January to May 2024

The Strand will be reduced to a single lane of traffic, traffic management measures will be in operation at the Torwood Street, Victoria Parade, and Strand junctions.

Phase 3 – May to July 2024

Full closure of the Strand to all traffic for approximately 8-weeks. Diversionary routes will be in place. During this phase the biggest changes to the road layout will be made.

Phase 4 – July to August 2024

Road closure will be lifted, and traffic will be able to pass through the Strand using the new layout.

Cary Parade will be reduced to a single lane running in both directions.

Phase 5 – September 2024

Final surfacing and finishing works including the installation of the new tribute to Agatha Christie.

Throughout all phases of work there will be access to the harbour, Victoria Parade, Fleet Walk (for permitted vehicles), and Fleet Walk car park. Pedestrian walkways and safe crossing points will also be provided. Businesses and car parks in and around the area remain open.

‘Breathtaking’ HS2 failure slammed after whistleblowers allege cover up

The government is facing fresh political backlash over HS2’s “staggering failure” amid whistleblower accusations of a multi-billion pound cover up.

Guy Taylor, Jessica Frank-Keyes www.cityam.com

Explosive new allegations published in the Sunday Times say senior executives at HS2 Ltd, the company charged with building the high speed line, shredded documents and used misleading projections to ensure money kept flowing into the project.

Whistleblowers claim they were told by bosses to lie about the project’s cost and were sacked after speaking out. They say parliament was not informed of the real cost of HS2 for years, all while voting on laws that approved its construction.

Louise Haigh, shadow transport secretary, told City A.M.: “These are serious allegations that make the Conservatives’ breathtaking lack of oversight of HS2 all the more shocking.”

“As chief secretary, chancellor and now as Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak failed to meet with HS2 [Ltd] once as the cost to the taxpayer soared.”

“Taxpayers are paying the price for this staggering failure. This is a government with no direction, no plan and no regard for taxpayers’ money.”

HS2’s internal fraud unit is now investigating allegations of a cover up. HS2 Ltd vehemently denies the accusations published by the Sunday Times.

Liberal Democrat treasury spokesperson Sarah Olney MP told City A.M. “the Conservative government allowed costs to spiral out of control on HS2, and these latest revelations raise questions about what they knew and when.”

“It is vital that an independent inquiry gets to the bottom of these allegations – including whether Conservative ministers misled Parliament over costs.

Former HS2 analyst Stephen Cresswell told the Sunday Times he repeatedly attempted to alert ministers, the National Audit Office and HS2’s fraud department over cost issues but was told to “concentrate on something else”.

Another source told the paper her phone was confiscated and she was pressured into handing over private messages after being seen with a whistleblower. She said she was eventually sacked.

Doug Thornton, who directed HS2’s land and property department, said his boss became “aggressive and argumentative” when he planned to raise concerns at a board meeting. He was later sacked just 11 minutes after reporting a grievance, the report said. 

Copies of a 2015 Deloitte report investigating costs associated with buying or compensating property owners near the route were shredded, according to whistleblower colonel Andrew Bruce.

A spokesperson for HS2 Ltd told City A.M. the “allegations are simply untrue.”

“The claims made by Bruce and Thornton, which have been covered by the media on multiple occasions, were put under intense scrutiny by the National Audit Office. Its report published five years ago found nothing untoward. All land and property costs are in line with the published budget.”

“HS2 Ltd’s work is subject to extensive scrutiny including being audited annually by the National Audit Office.”

The fresh allegations come after Rishi Sunak axed the Manchester leg of the project amid spiralling costs.

A total budget of £32bn, allocated in 2012, has soared to upwards of £71bn, and some projections take the total figure to over £100bn.

James Watkins, head of policy and public impact at London Chamber of Commerce and Industry said: “The latest alleged revelations around HS2 funding and financial conduct over the years needs to be taken very seriously. We expect the Department for Transport (DfT) to make a thorough investigation so that levelling up of all areas of the UK could take place smoothly. “

“A project such as HS2 requires proper governance and oversight. All of us must have access to a super-fast, convenient transport system to commute to the UK’s financial hubs while businesses should not have to think twice about capacity and skills issues during recruitment.”

A spokesperson for the DfT said: “The government and its public bodies takes such claims seriously and will ensure they are thoroughly investigated.”

Rising homelessness could bankrupt seaside town 

Councils across England spent more than ever tackling homelessness in 2022, official data released last week showed. BBC News has been to Hastings in East Sussex where hundreds of families are in temporary accommodation – a situation the local council says could push it into bankruptcy.

www.bbc.com

The Grumpy Café may not sound like the friendliest place to grab a coffee but inside the large, warm meeting place in the centre of Hastings, the atmosphere is anything but crotchety.

“My children call me the grumpy cook, and I thought, ‘I like that,'” says owner Barry Ashley.

The not-for-profit café is busy most mornings, as locals pop in for coffee and cake, or a more substantial cooked breakfast. The money made is used to help locals with ever-increasing needs, particularly homelessness.

Every evening Mr Ashley, 60, cooks meals for families in temporary accommodation who don’t have cooking facilities in their rooms: “It breaks my heart to see the conditions they’re living in. It’s really heartbreaking.”

It is an issue close to his heart as half of the Grumpy Cook’s eight staff are in temporary accommodation – a home provided by a local authority, often in the private rented sector, supposedly for a short period, but often for years.

Sharing a bed

Barista Keira Boorman has been living in a one-bed flat since her 19-month-old daughter was born, and it’s a squeeze: “She can’t have her own bed because there’s not enough room. She spreads herself across the bed, moving constantly. I don’t get much sleep.”

The 19-year-old became homeless after she was no longer able to live with her mother. Despite working at the Grumpy Cook, she has little hope of finding a place to call her own.

“Most two-bed flats are around £950 a month and making that is nearly impossible as someone who doesn’t have a silly amount of savings or earnings.” she says.

“I don’t have a guarantor either. They’ll give me a viewing, but then pass it [the flat] on to to someone else.”

Bankruptcy looming

It’s a familiar tale throughout Hastings, a fading seaside resort, among the poorest towns in England.

More than 500 local families cannot afford a home and are in need of temporary accommodation, a situation that could push Hastings Borough Council into bankruptcy. This small district council will spend £5.6m housing them this financial year, a quarter of its entire budget.

House prices have almost doubled in Hastings over the past decade, one of the largest increases in England. At the same time, private rents have soared and the Local Housing Allowance, the maximum amount of housing benefit tenants can receive, has been frozen by ministers since 2020.

“We didn’t have a single two-bedroom flat advertised at local housing allowance rates last year,” says Chris Hancock, director of housing at Hastings Borough Council. “There is a strong risk this could bankrupt the council. We cannot make our budget stack up if we continue to have to spend this amount of money on temporary accommodation.”

The council is spending £11m buying properties to use as temporary accommodation, reducing its need to pay the ever-rising costs private providers are able to charge. Adding to the problem are the 900 properties available for short-term let, on sites such as Airbnb.

There is a bitter irony to the situation Hastings finds itself in. A decade ago, London councils were moving their homeless families to the town, as accommodation there was both available and affordable.

Figures released by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities last week show councils in England spent a record amount of money last year tackling homelessness.

It shows at least £2.4bn was spent tackling the problem in 2022/23. More than £1.7bn of that was used to pay for temporary accommodation.

The data also revealed:

  • Overall spending on homelessness increased by 10.5% since 2021/22
  • For those council areas that reported data for both this year and last, costs have increased in 192 of 232 areas
  • The biggest increase was in Liverpool, where the cost of tackling homelessness increased by 341% in one year, to £17.2m
  • Costs in Warrington increased by 210% while in councils Wolverhampton and Darlington saw their costs double

Back in the kitchen of the Grumpy Cook café, Nicola Skinner is helping Barry Ashley cook sausage and mash. The 33-year-old, her partner and their four children were made homeless in April when her landlord decided to sell the property.

The family consider themselves lucky, as the temporary accommodation they’ve been placed in allows their children to stay at the same schools. However, Ms Skinner knows the council could move them on at any point and fears they won’t find anywhere affordable to rent.

“A few of them [letting agents] want incomes of 30 times the monthly rent, which is impossible to reach in Hastings,” he says. “Our town is too poor to reach the prices they’re trying to charge.”

Tories fail to ban lion paw imports..

..and other animal welfare issues.

Lord Goldsmith, a Tory peer and former environment minister, said anybody who “cares even one jot” about the issue should choose another party, claiming the prime minister “could not care less”.

Full text reads:

The Conservative Party’s Action Plan for Animal Welfare promised the greatest shake up & improvement for generations.  It was signed off by Boris Johnson’s govt and was happening. 

We had already begun legislating to ban for example: 

 -live exports of farm animals;  

-keeping monkeys as pets;  

-importing hunting trophies from endangered species;  

-the import of shark fins.  

We were introducing measures to clamp down on pet smuggling;  

The #ActionForAnimals plan also committed us to addressing issues like cages for farm birds, farrowing crates for pigs, advertising of cruel animal experiences overseas, imports of fur and fois gras, introducing closed seasons for UK wildlife like hares.

When he was looking for votes, Rishi Sunak promised to deliver the plan and woolly headed conservative MPs chose to believe him (or pretended to).

Today almost every single part of that plan has been ditched … by Rishi Sunak. 

The stark truth is that anyone who cares even one jot about animal welfare will need to look elsewhere at the next election.  The current PM simply could not care less.

The Seaton area community has given £5.25 million to Seaton Hospital – give it back to us

Martin Shaw seatonmatters.org 

In 2016, I added up the contributions that the local community had made to the hospital. It came to over £2.8 million in constant prices, which represented over £4 million at 2016 prices. I have now used the Bank of England’s inflation calculator to produced an updated estimate. The local donations amount to £5,251,830 at September 2023 prices – and that’s not counting donations since 2016.

A hospital built with over 50 per cent local contributions should never have been handed to a company like NHS Property Services which charges the NHS extortionate rents. Morally it belongs to the local community.

If the NHS can’t use a whole wing of the hospital – a wing that was built 100 per cent by local donations – NHSPS should give it back to us, free of charge.

Labour asks watchdog to investigate Sunak over wife’s interest in startup fund

Labour has written to the standards watchdog to ask whether Rishi Sunak should have declared that companies co-owned by his wife were given £2m through his government scheme to help startups in the pandemic.

Rowena Mason www.theguardian.com 

Lucy Powell, the shadow leader of the House of Commons, wrote to the commissioner for standards to ask whether they should have been declared in parliamentary proceedings, after the Guardian reported that four companies linked to Akshata Murty had received investments from the Future Fund.

None of Murty’s investments that benefited from the Future Fund appear publicly on Sunak’s register of ministerial interests and he did not reveal them when mentioning the scheme in the House of Commons.

Critics have raised concerns over a lack of transparency and the potential for a perceived conflict of interest given Sunak launched the scheme to help startups – a sector in which his wife is a known investor – despite warnings that the fund may not represent value for money.

Murty had a financial interest in Carousel Ventures, which owns an underwear business, as well as Mrs Wordsmith, an education company; Digme Fitness, a gym business; and The New Craftsmen, a furniture firm – all of which received loans from the Future Fund that later converted into equity stakes.

In her letter, Powell asked Daniel Greenberg, the commissioner, whether Sunak should have declared the interests when talking about the Future Fund during parliamentary proceedings.

“Members are required to declare any financial interests which satisfy the test of relevance, including indirect financial interests, such as the financial interests of a spouse or partner, or another family member,” she said.

“Despite this, the prime minister has talked about the Future Fund multiple times in the House of Commons without declaring his wife’s interests relating to businesses benefiting from this fund.”

Sunak launched the Future Fund to help emerging businesses during the pandemic but it has since been heavily criticised. The scheme allowed any eligible company to access funding if they had match funding from investors and passed required checks, so neither ministers nor the British Business Bank had a role in selecting which firms got money.

Powell highlighted that Sunak had been caught failing to abide by the rules of the house before when he did not mention his wife’s investment in a firm called Koru Kids when it was due to benefit from a policy announced in the budget.

“The public will rightly be concerned by conflict of interest, given the prime minister set up a £1bn Future Fund to help start ups against civil service advice and then four companies linked to his wife benefited,” she said.

“I would be grateful if you could investigate this situation, and report on whether the code has been breached, particularly: should the Future Fund loans to companies linked to the prime minister’s wife have been declared orally by the Rt Hon Member for Richmond (Yorks) when he mentioned the Future Fund in the house?”

A government spokesperson said: “Labour are showing their true anti-business colours in attacking a scheme that supported a range of businesses through the pandemic. Labour backed the Future Fund when it was introduced and were aware of the eligibility criteria for the scheme, so this is a deeply cynical U-turn on their position.”

The ministerial register declares that Murty owns Catamaran Ventures and is a venture capital investor with a number of shareholdings, without specifying them.

Sunak’s adviser on ministerial interests, whom he appointed this year, has said declaring all shareholdings would be an “excessive degree of intrusion into the private affairs of ministers that would be unreasonable, particularly in respect of their family members”.

However, in April this year Sunak had to declare that his wife had a shareholding in Koru Kids. The standards commissioner also found that Sunak should have declared the interest when asked about it in a select committee hearing.

Jupp spared from having to vote for increased river pollution

Plans for a bill have been dropped for fear of Conservative MPs being seen to vote for more water pollution in the run-up to a general election, in a development first reported by ITV.

But if they get back in they can always do another reverse ferret. – Owl

Ministers shelve new plan to ditch nutrient rules on river pollution

The government has quietly abandoned plans for a second attempt at killing off river protection rules in an effort to increase housebuilding.

Adam Vaughan www.thetimes.co.uk 

In August Michael Gove, the levelling up secretary, announced that he wanted to ditch the “nutrient neutrality” rules which mean housebuilders in 27 catchments across England cannot win planning permission without offsetting extra pollution from new homes. Officials say the rules are blocking about 16,500 new homes a year.

However, the plan was defeated in a House of Lords vote last month after Labour united with Greens, Lib Dems and cross-party peers.

Less than a fortnight later the government revealed it was planning to resurrect efforts to kill off the protections, by drawing up a new Bill to pass in parliament next year.

That second effort to ditch nutrient neutrality rules is now dead, according to a government source. They said that plans for a bill had been dropped for fear of Conservative MPs being seen to vote for more water pollution in the run-up to a general election, in a development first reported by ITV.

Polling suggests that more than half of the public say the government’s handling of sewage pollution in rivers and seas will influence how they vote next year.

Scrapping the rules would have meant shifting the cost of the extra pollution from housebuilders on to taxpayers. Preserving the regulations also marks a victory for The Times Clean it Up campaign, which has called on the government to resist pressure to drop the rules for the 74 local authorities where they apply.

Charles Watson, chairman of River Action, said: “The prime minister has finally listened to the calls of the public who simply can’t face the prospect of any more pollution of our rivers. Nobody was fooled by government spin that nutrient neutrality laws were mere EU red tape’. They are fundamental and entirely reasonable protections which ensure that the building of new housing doesn’t add additional pollution load to our rivers which are already under huge environmental stress from both sewage discharges and agricultural run-off.”

Housebuilders are privately disappointed by the move. Labour has said it would reform rather than scrap the nutrient neutrality rules, promising to boost offsetting to enable new homes to be built while protecting rivers.

Matthew Pennycock, shadow minister for housing and planning, said: “If the government have indeed abandoned their reckless approach to the nutrient neutrality challenge we welcome it. We can unlock these new homes without damaging our environment.”

Meanwhile, the High Court has approved a challenge by campaigners against the Environment Agency over what they say is its failure to stop chicken farms polluting the River Wye. Demand for cheap chickens has been blamed for the intensification of poultry farms along the river, with the birds’ manure washing into the river and causing nutrient pollution. In May officials downgraded the status of the Wye to “unfavourable-declining”.

Watson, whose group was granted a judicial review, said: “We will vigorously make the case that a prime cause for the recent ecological collapse of the River Wye is the Environment Agency’s decision to slavishly follow Defra’s guidance to not enforce critical provisions of the 2018 Farming Rules for Water. These critically important regulations state that fertilisers and manures must not be spread on soils already over-saturated with excess nutrients.”

A Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities spokesperson said:‘We are considering next steps so we can explore how we can unlock the homes we need.”

Jeremy gets the Jitters – infection spreads to cabinet

Jeremy Hunt ‘set to quit as MP’ in fear of a Portillo moment

Jeremy Hunt is expected to stand down as an MP before the next election, according to senior Conservatives, who say the chancellor is aware he could suffer a “Michael Portillo” moment on polling day.

Toby Helm www.theguardian.com

Hunt has already put himself forward and been selected for the new Surrey constituency of Godalming and Ash, after his South West Surrey seat was dissolved and split into two under boundary changes.

His spokesman said on Friday that his position remained that he would stand. But with his party in increasingly dire straits as byelection defeats mount up, and Labour’s poll lead solidifying, several senior sources nationally and locally have told the Observer that they expect him to announce he is stepping down much nearer to the election.

Rumours have been swirling among Surrey Conservatives and at Westminster to this effect, amid cataclysmic predictions of wipeout for several serving cabinet ministers after more than 13 years in power.

One former minister said that with a Labour government in prospect, the options for Hunt of fighting the new seat were not attractive, whether he won or lost: “Barring a miracle [of the Tories winning and forming another government], I can’t see Jeremy wanting to be in opposition under a new leader. And if he loses he will be the biggest scalp on election night. That is not a departure anyone would want. People in Surrey are saying he will not stand.”

Were Hunt to stand down, it would raise questions as to whether he could remain chancellor in the run-up to the general election.

Hunt had a successful business career before entering politics and would expect to be elevated to the House of Lords were he to leave the Commons, allowing him to retain a political role alongside his commercial interests.

Last weekend the Liberal Democrats confirmed that Hunt’s old political adversary in Surrey, Paul Follows, the Liberal Democrat leader on Waverley council, had been chosen as its candidate for the Godalming and Ash seat.

Minutes after being selected, Follows told the local party that he would “work to ensure that the Portillo moment in the public mindset will become the Hunt moment”.

Another former Tory minister said: “Of course Jeremy cannot say so now, but I think he won’t stand. It is not uncommon to pull out having said you will stand, citing changes of circumstances. Short of turning things round and winning, and him remaining chancellor, which is not exactly likely, there is nothing in it for him.”

Follows told the Observer: “Jeremy Hunt is right to be concerned about losing the contest, and certainly right to be worried about ending up on the backbenches if somehow he won it.”

Recent polls have suggested that several cabinet ministers including Hunt, party chairman Greg Hands, the deputy prime minister Oliver Dowden, and leader of the House of Commons Penny Mordaunt – as well as Hunt – could lose their seats at the next election.

A special MRP poll published recently by the Observer, which took into account the new boundaries that the next election will be fought on, suggested Labour would win 420 seats – equating to a landslide 190-seat majority.

According to the poll the Tories would take just 149 seats and the Lib Dems 23, with the result similar to Labour’s 1997 landslide when Tony Blair’s party secured a majority of 179 with 418 seats. The Conservatives would lose all their “red wall” seats and 20 behind the “blue wall”, which would include ones in Surrey.

Hunt has served as MP for South West Surrey since 2005 when he won with a majority of 5,711. In the 2010 election he increased this to 16,318 and then further to 28,556 in 2015. However, in the 2017 election his majority was cut to 21,590 and then to 8,817 in 2019 as the Lib Dem vote increased.

As chancellor he is currently under pressure from Tory MPs to improve the economy before polling day, and deliver on prime minister Rishi Sunak’s pledges to cut inflation and reduce debt.

Breaking: NO public consultation on the partial closure of Seaton Hospital

Martin Shaw seatonmatters.org /

The Devon Integrated Care Board (ICB) have said that the ‘stakeholder engagement process’, on the proposal to hand back a wing of Seaton Hospital to NHS Property Services (potentially leading to its demolition) will NOT include a public consultation – although the wing was WHOLLY paid for by public donations, making the Seaton area community THE most important stakeholder.

Only this week the ICB released, at my request, its report on the proposal, which boasted about the original consultation process for the hospital beds closure in 2016. Presumably they’ve realised, as I reminded them in my letter this week, that the consultation showed people DIDN’T want the closure.

So – fearing the Seaton public would once again say no, they’ve simply cut us out altogether this time!

Help design Cranbrook’s new town centre and you could win £50!

Local people can share their ideas on how Cranbrook’s new town centre should look. eastdevon.gov.uk

By answering a short survey at eastdevon.gov.uk/cranbrook-town-centre before 10th November 2023, you could be in with a chance of winning a £50 voucher.

Cllr Paul Arnott, Leader of East Devon District Council and Chair of the Exeter and East Devon Enterprise Zone, said:

“This is an important opportunity for you to help shape the future of Cranbrook. Your ideas really matter. We want to hear from as many people as possible – especially young people and those who don’t normally get involved.

“Legal agreements are being put in place which mean developers will contribute millions of pounds towards facilities and spaces in the town centre, like a library and leisure centre.

“We want your ideas to help decide what else should be included, what should be built first and where it should be built. Your views and ideas will then be used by EDDC and its partners to create a long-term town centre masterplan in summer 2024.”

To discuss in more detail, please come along to drop-in sessions. The first one takes place at the free Family Fun Day on 24th October, 10.30am – 1.30pm at Cranbrook’s Younghayes Centre, where there will be refreshments and children can have fun on a bouncy castle or get creative in THG’s Creative Cabin . You can also share your ideas on 9th November from 4-7pm at the Younghayes Centre or on 16th November at the Cranberry Farm pub from 6-8pm. 

Keep an eye on these websites for events and other ways to get involved:

facebook.com/ex5alivehub

eedez.com/cranbrook

Cranbrook town centre is one of the sites in Exeter and East Devon Enterprise Zone. The first shops, the beginning of a town square and a Morrisons supermarket are being built and should be finished in Spring 2024. East Devon District Council (EDDC) has recently bought 3.85 acres of land next to the supermarket and will receive more from the developers shortly. This will make it easier to agree what happens next and start the next phase of the town centre development.

There is a lot of work to do before more facilities are built in the town centre. When the consultation closes, the responses will be analysed and the information used to help draw up a town centre masterplan. The masterplan will show how the town centre will be laid out and what kind of place it will be. There are already commitments from Devon County Council to build a youth centre, children’s centre and library. Cranbrook Town Council is aiming to develop a community building which will also house the town council offices. A leisure centre is included in the EDDC Leisure Strategy and there are plans for a Health and Wellbeing Hub and a Fire Station. More needs to be done to finalise how each of these buildings will happen. In challenging financial times, this includes finding the full amount of money to build them as the developers will not fully fund everything. EDDC is committed to working with its partners to realise the ambitions for a 21st century town centre for Cranbrook that meets the needs of the people who live, work and visit it.

The entire cost of the ‘redundant’ hospital wing was raised by the Seaton public

Martin Shaw seatonmatters.org /

I’ve gone back to Mary Wood’s splendid booklet on the history of Seaton Hospital (1991). While the original hospital opened in 1988 was paid for £1 to £1 by the League of Friends’ fundraising and the NHS, the ‘whole cost’ of the wing which the ICB now wants to declare redundant – potentially to demolish – was met by the League. The NHS only had to pay the running costs when it opened in 1990.

This makes it all the more outrageous that Seaton Hospital was placed in the ownership of NHS Property Services in 2016, and they could now bulldoze it. Morally the hospital, especially this wing, belongs to the community in Seaton, Colyton, Colyford, Beer, Axmouth and surrounding villages who raised the money to build it in the first place. The ICB, having shamefully failed to make proper use of it, should now hand it back free of charge.

Thanks to Ted Gosling, curator of Seaton Museum and the town’s only Freeman, who gave me this booklet back in 2017.

Jitter time for Jupp

By-election disaster shows no seat is safe for the Tories as Keir Starmer gets closer to No 10 Inews.co.uk

John Curtice: No silver lining for Tories in by-election drubbings www.thetimes.co.uk

‘Architects of disaster’: Boris and Truss accused of destroying Tories www.independent.co.uk

Simon has made no secret of his support for the right wing of the party.

Watch: Tory candidate bolts from Tamworth by-election while winner gives victory speech www.telegraph.co.uk

[Didn’t Helen Hurford do something like this at theTiverton & Hontion by-election count when Richard Foord overturned a long standing Tory majority?]

Campaign to save Seaton Hospital wing demolition

Efforts are ramping up to save part of Seaton Hospital at risk of being demolished.

Campaigners are pushing for the two-storey wing at the community hospital to be repurposed as a care hub, which would include support for patients with dementia, as well as palliative care and bereavement support.

Bradley Gerrard, local democracy reporter www.radioexe.co.uk

MP Richard Foord (Lib Dem, Tiverton & Honiton) raised the issue at prime minister’s questions in parliament on Wednesday, and has written to health secretary Steve Barclay to request an urgent meeting.

“The proposal to demolish this wing is an insult to the community that raised millions of pounds to help fund the upkeep of services at that hospital,” he told MPs in the house of commons.

His letter to Mr Barclay, he said Seaton & District Hospital League of Friends has raised £2 million in recent years to support the hospital, adding that the demolition of the wing could “threaten the long-term viability of the hospital as a whole.”

And East Devon District Council leader Paul Arnott (Lib Dem, Coly Valley) told the authority’s council meeting this week that he understood the seriousness of the situation.

“We have already started having internal meetings about what the possibilities may be, and we will explore those as urgently as possible,” he said.

“My personal view is that this is the havoc caused when too many agencies are involved, and we as East Devon need to show leadership here as we are the closest tier of local government that can do something about it.”

The hospital wing has been largely unused since 2017. However, some services remain based there, including offices for palliative care nurses and other teams, with parts of it also used during the covid pandemic.

The space is currently rented by the Devon Integrated Care Board (ICB) from NHS Property Services, a government-owned company.

A spokesperson for NHS Devon said the site costs about £300,000 a year in rent and other charges.

“This is poor use of taxpayers’ money at a time when we are forecasting another budget deficit of more than £40 million this year,” the spokesperson said.

“In recent months, we have been talking to local health, care and community partners to see if they are interested and financially able to take on the space, but no viable schemes have been received and we started the process of handing the ward space back to NHS Property Services (NHSPS) so we can save the money that is currently being wasted on it.

“We have always been very happy to talk to prospective occupants of the space if they have a financially viable scheme to take it on – and we remain so.”

A spokesperson for Mr Foord said the MP had a meeting planned with the chair of NHS Devon on Friday (20 October) to further discuss the proposals.

Campaigners hope that NHS Property Services might consider transferring ownership of the building to the NHS in Devon, or alternatively to a community interest company, that could then pay rent.

A spokesperson for NHS Property Services said it had not yet received a formal approach from Mr Foord.

“However, if and when it does arrive, we will of course respond according to our usual protocols,” the spokesperson said.

Chair of NHS board who wants to close part of our hospital ‘went into politics to oppose community hospital closure’

Martin Shaw

Seaton & Colyton Matters

Dr Sarah Wollaston, the chair of the Devon Integrated Care Board (ICB) which is closing part of Seaton Hospital, is the former Conservative MP for Totnes who lost her seat after switching to the Lib Dems in 2019.

According to Wikipedia, she was ‘ spurred into politics by her opposition to the threatened closure of Moretonhampstead Community Hospital in 2006’.

The hospital is still open today: The Mid-Devon Advertiser (27 July 2006) reported:

‘Friends of the hospital, who raised £500,000 for its refurbishment in the 1990s, promised the trust ‘one hell of a fight’ if [the hospital was closed]. But now the trust has recognised the benefits brought about by new arrangements in which hospital staff and GPs work more closely together. 

The hospital has also started to offer services such as blood transfusions which were previously only available at Exeter’s RD & E Hospital. None of the community hospital’s nine beds have been closed as they are proving cheaper than acute beds in general hospital and trust spokesman, Nick Pearson, said the future was looking bright.

“Offering more services locally is of benefit to local people and it’s also good for the local NHS economy as it provides better value,” he said.

Surely there is a lesson for the ICB here – look again at referring the Seaton wing to Property Services, bring in more services locally, and turn the hospital into a community health hub – or reopen the ward for aftercare and pandemic preparedness.

Thanks to Cllr John Heath for initial research.

Welsh Water admits illegally spilling sewage for years

Welsh Water has admitted illegally spilling untreated sewage at dozens of treatment plants for years.

Discharges into the River Teifi

Outfall in the River Teifi from Cardigan’s waste water treatment plant

By Jonah Fisher www.bbc.co.uk

The admission came after the BBC presented the water company with analysis of its own data.

One of their worst performing plants is in Cardigan in west Wales.

The company has been spilling untreated sewage there into an environmentally protected area near a rare dolphin habitat for at least a decade.

Welsh Water says it is working to tackle the problems and does not dispute the analysis, which was shared with BBC News by mathematician and former University College London professor Peter Hammond from campaign group Windrush Against Sewage Pollution (WASP).

Most of the UK has a combined sewerage system, meaning that both rainwater and wastewater – from toilets, bathrooms and kitchens – are carried in the same pipes. Usually, all the waste is carried to a sewage treatment works.

During heavy rain, to prevent a plant becoming overwhelmed, it is allowed to discharge untreated sewage. But releasing any before a plant reaches the overflow level stipulated on its permit is an illegal breach.

Map showing location of Cardigan sewage outflow

Prof Hammond requested data on 11 Welsh treatment plants and found that 10 had been releasing untreated sewage at times when they should have been treating it.

Cardigan was particularly bad, spilling for more than 200 days each year from 2019-2022.

The data provided to Prof Hammond showed that Cardigan almost never treated the amount of sewage it was supposed to.

According to its permit it has to treat 88 litres a second before spilling – but had illegally spilled untreated sewage for a cumulative total of 1,146 days from the start of 2018 to the end of May 2023.

“This is the worst sewage works I’ve come across in terms of illegal discharges,” he said.

Prof Peter Hammond used Welsh Water’s own data to prove they were illegally spilling

When presented with the findings Welsh Water admitted it has between 40 and 50 wastewater treatment plants currently operating in breach of their permits. It said decisions on which plants to improve were taken with customer bills in mind, and that because there is “no measurable environmental impact” of the Cardigan estuary spills, these have been a low priority.

The outflow point from the Cardigan treatment plant spills into the Teifi estuary and Welsh Water points to Poppit Sands, a designated bathing beach two miles away, that has water quality consistently rated as “excellent”.

The treatment plant in Cardigan spills both treated and untreated sewage into the River Teifi

Environmental groups say testing at Poppit Sands only takes place from May to September and there is no regular monitoring of the impact of sewage discharges in the River Teifi. It is designated as a Special Area of Conservation (SAC) and is home to lamprey, Atlantic salmon and otters. The Teifi flows into Cardigan Bay, home to one of Europe’s largest populations of bottlenose dolphins.

“Untreated sewage causes a host of problems on our rivers,” says Gail Davies-Walsh of rivers campaign group Afonydd Cymru.

“High nutrient levels coming from sewage lead to algal blooms that lead to the depletion of oxygen in our rivers. And that clearly has knock-on impacts to our fish populations and to other species.”

The regulator, Natural Resources Wales, told the BBC that it has been aware of the issues at Cardigan for eight years and has issued enforcement notices but no fines. It says it is now looking at data from 101 treatment plants run by Welsh Water that have been spilling before they reach their permit capacity.

Welsh Water, a not-for-profit company, said in a follow-up email that it was not under “formal investigation”, that NRW’s figures are “inaccurate,” and that it stands by its total of about 45 treatment plants currently breaking their permits.

Cardigan’s problems date back to 2004 when Welsh Water installed a wastewater treatment system which filters sewage through a membrane. That is not how most sewage plants work.

The sewage network in Cardigan is old and leaky and during Spring tides saltwater gets into the pipes and the treatment plant.

The saltwater causes bacteria to release an enzyme that blocks the membrane. That has meant the plant regularly fails to treat the right amount of sewage and spills untreated sewage.

“We’re not proud of this at all,” Steve Wilson, managing director for wastewater services at Welsh Water said. “It’s a very uncomfortable position to be in – but it’s not for the want of trying. We have been trying to fix this.”

Those fixes have not worked. In 2025 work is due to begin on a new treatment plant for Cardigan, at a cost of £20m.

For Gail Davies-Walsh of Afonydd Cymru there are questions now for both the water company and the regulator, Natural Resources Wales, which is responsible for enforcing permits and, if necessary, issuing penalties.

“Fundamentally this site [Cardigan] has been discharging raw sewage for possibly 10 years and no action has been taken,” she says.

NRW provided the BBC with a timeline of their responses which shows a number of enforcement notices – but no prosecutions or fines. In the last five years the NRW has made no prosecutions anywhere in Wales for illegal sewage spills of this type.

“We have prosecuted Welsh Water on a number of instances for pollution events, just not for low flow spills as is the case here,” Huwel Manley, NRW’s head of operations for south west Wales. said. “But we are working with trying to set national guidance along with England so that we have a more standardised approach as to how and when we take that prosecution route.”

Regulators in England are also looking at flow rates through treatment plants as part of what they say is their largest ever criminal investigation into potentially illegal spilling.

Court quashes Frome regeneration planning permission 

A high court judge has quashed the planning permission of a developer which was meant to be regenerating a key part of Frome town centre.

By Ruth Bradley www.bbc.co.uk

Saxonvale has been derelict for decades and in recent years there have been two rivals proposals for the ten-acre site.

Somerset Council owns the land and Acorn Property Group is its preferred developer.

A judge quashed Acorn’s planning consent, due to an issue with the allocation of land for employment.

That court case had been brought by rival community-based developer Mayday Saxonvale which also has planning board approval for its own plans for the site.,

More than 250 people opposed the Acorn plan ahead of it being passed by Mendip District Council in 2021

Amy Proctor, strategic partnerships manager at Acorn Property Group, said the company remained “committed and positive” to its vision for Saxonvale.

“We are disappointed with the outcome of the judicial review, which ultimately centred on a procedural technicality,” she said.

“For over two decades it has lain vacant, having faced ongoing challenges at the planning stage. The technical challenges for this site cannot be underestimated and events like this will only cause further delay.

“Like so many of the residents of Frome, we are all keen for development to commence.”

Local business owner and Mayday Saxonvale director, Damon Moore, who lodged the challenge, said: “We are incredibly happy with the outcome of this judicial review.

“The decision by the judge acknowledges the critical importance of Saxonvale in providing a genuine town centre extension.

“Judge Jay ruled that Acorn’s scheme for Saxonvale failed to provide the requirement of the council’s own local plan for much-needed employment space to be located on the Saxonvale site,” Mr Moore said.

Acorn Property Group said it was going to put in a revised planning application to the council as soon as possible and it remains in a contractual relationship with Somerset Council.

Mayday Saxonvale said it wanted the council to now talk to it instead.

A spokesperson for Somerset Council said: “We are always disappointed if the Courts decide we got a decision wrong, so we will be carefully considering the technical issues on which this judgment hinged before deciding on our next steps.”