Environment Agency picks up the tab for EDDC blunder

 

Granary small

Our EDA Environmental Editor reports that a couple of months ago the Environment Agency (EA) put the finishing touches to a £85K flood alleviation scheme by the entrance to Budleigh Salterton cricket field in Granary lane. This is not to protect the cricket field but the handful of houses that have been built in recent years in an area that habitually floods.

It is very welcome news to the residents who have been flooded out four times in in the last couple of years. They had feared they were too few in number to reach the top of EA’s priority list, especially since the coalition cut real expenditure on flood defences. Their urgent needs for protection were also in danger of being deferred as part of longer term studies in how to restore fully functioning tidal flow to the lower reaches of Otter Estuary.

So this is good news, and as an added bonus, the scheme fits unobtrusively into the landscape. Congratulations all round!

However, this £85K expenditure (it’s your money and mine) was entirely avoidable and is the consequence of irresponsible historic planning decisions. Could EDDC make the same mistake again?

Election news from fellow-member of CoVoP

FRAGOFF (Formby Residents Action Group Opposition From Formby), a group from the new national organisation Community Voice on Planning (CoVoP)* of which EDA is an active member, has just sent this e-mail:

Hi All
Many thanks to all our supporters and helpers with our campaign, without whom we would not have been able to put a candidate forward, we won by over 500 votes and FRAG now has a Councillor inside. We have proved if the community stick together no matter what political beliefs they may have you can win and make changes.
Community Action and Not Party Politics has proved to be a winning combination for FRAG and the fact that we are non party political but represent the residents of the community.
Taking a seat from our labour run council who are voting all the housing through makes us feel even better.
If you want to know how we did it just ask us and we can let you know and guide you to a success at your next election. You can do it as well.
Kind regards
Maria

http://www.fragoff.co.uk

*http://covop.org/

N.B. The East Devon Alliance has not put forward candidates for election, but FRAGOFF’s example serves to show what can be done.

 

Don’t miss East Devon Writers event TONIGHT at Ottery St Mary !

A lively evening of free entertainment, celebrating East Devon’s literature and the exceptional landscape that has inspired so much of it.

Venue: The Institute, Ottery St Mary

Time: 7.30 -9 pm

Parking: Free  after 7 pm at nearby Sainsbury’s car park

 

East Devon landscape makes money..amongst other good things, says RSPB.

See  http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/s-time-leave-children-better-environment-act/story-21126750-detail/story.html
para 3 – about importance of nature to our wellbeing
para 4 – fundamental to the economic prosperity in Westcountry, “quality of the landscapes that makes the region an attractive place to visit, to work, and to do business.”
para 6 – importance of bees and hoverflies to pollinate crops

“Should we build less…?”

 

Are large developments on greenfield sites the only way to solve the housing crisis? Here’s some practical lateral thinking:

http://www.theglasshouse.org.uk/reflections-from-the-glass-house-debate-series-2013-14/

 

Bloody noses, but will they listen?

Warning shots fired over the bows of all the major parties and now the war is escalating  and there are likely to be major casualties – mostly US.  Will the major parties (which now presumably includes UKIP) listen?

We will be here.

Performance targets can produce perverse results

In particular, the target that all planning applications should be determined within 13 weeks – something we have had rather a lot of trouble with in East Devon when contentious planning applications have been rushed through with the excuse that the target must be met:

http://www.lgcplus.com/briefings/planning-performance-targets-may-be-driving-perverse-behaviour/5070872.article

Minister friend of Cameron attacks Boles (but only in words!)

Full article from today’s Daily Mail (link at the end of the article)

The countryside could be swamped with thousands of unwanted homes under new planning laws, a minister warned yesterday.  In an outspoken attack, Ed Vaizey says his own government’s ‘presumption in favour of development’ is artificially raising estimates of housing demand.  In a letter to planning minister Nick Boles, the culture minister lays bare Tory fears that the coalition’s decision to tear up planning laws risks alienating traditional supporters and costing votes.

Mr Vaizey, who is one of David Cameron’s closest allies, says the projected levels of housing need in parts of the countryside – including his own Oxfordshire constituency – are up to three times the true figure.  He warns this has ‘significant consequences for many local communities which are now faced with levels of growth that will fundamentally change the nature of settlements’.  He calls for an ‘urgent review of the planning methodology that leads to such massive numbers of homes being planned, so that more realistic outcomes result’.  He says councils are being forced to earmark more and more land for housing or risk falling foul of the development presumption that leaves them little power to block projects they think excessive.

In his reply, Mr Boles defended the push for new housing, saying: ‘One of the key constraints that is affecting growth in some of our most prosperous and dynamic regions are high house prices and affordability. I am sure you will agree this is something we are all working hard to change.’  And he suggested that Mr Vaizey had got some of his facts wrong. He said the new assessment of housing need ‘did not automatically invalidate’ local housing plans and confirmed building on the green belt should be allowed only in exceptional circumstances.

Mr Boles said Oxfordshire should consider creating a new garden city if local communities were unhappy with the idea of expanding existing developments.  Mr Vaizey had warned that the lax rules around infrastructure meant that developers often delivered vital services such as roads and schools years after the houses are built.

The result, he says, is that ‘new and existing residents suffer a severe decline in services for a number of years’. Mr Vaizey’s comments are focused on the situation in Oxfordshire, where there is controversy over official projections that the county needs 100,000 new homes.  He says demographic trends in his own district of the county, the Vale of the White Horse, suggest an extra 468 homes a year are needed. But the ‘national methodology’ has produced a figure up to three times higher.

Four local councils in Oxfordshire have raised concerns about the plans. These include West Oxfordshire, which is run by Mr Cameron’s election agent Barry Norton.  Mr Norton said official housing projections were wrong and were likely to be challenged by the council.

The Prime Minister this week defended the planning changes, and said the result was that ‘planning applications are going up, house building is going up – a 23 per cent increase in houses built’.  He said the planning system was locally driven, and denied claims that Tory councils were blocking housing developments.  He added: ‘We’ve been building in West Oxfordshire more houses than was actually set out under our plan. I don’t accept that all these councils are nimbys.’

Jobs and homes? You might be better off somewhere else in the south west

We are supposed to be building homes to attract (and keep) young people and families.  However, those people will need jobs.  Exeter may not be the best place to have one:

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Exeter-salaries-lower-Southwest-neighbours/story-21127405-detail/story.html

Oh, no, Mr Developer – we don’t want cash for the communiyt; Ottery loses out (again)

One has to wonder whether this is a “scorched earth” policy.  What developer these days can’t afford a £30,000 payment for their development given current house prices?

 

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/news/town_could_lose_out_on_developer_s_cash_1_3603890

David Cameron’s election agent fights housing development – in David Cameron’s constituency!

You really could not make it up:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/greenpolitics/planning/10843648/Embarrassment-for-David-Cameron-as-his-own-election-agent-fights-new-homes-in-PMs-back-yard.html

Uplyme, AONB, and the future of cross-district co-operation

A welcome respose from East Devon District Councillor Ian Thomas inreaction to local and EDA concern about the proposals for 350 houses in the AONB near Uplyme. This would take overspill from West Dorset.
Some of what is included in Ian’s blog is about the grey areas of  Village Plans and the SHLAA (Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessments).  Some EDA members have direct experience of these processes being heavily and unduly influenced by councillors not declaring interests.
However, we are where we are. At least there is some evidence  emerging of timescales for presenting properly sourced evidence back to the Planning Inspector.

 

‘East Devon Alliance recap major planning applications’

Link to an article in this week’s Pulman’s View from Sidmouth (page 5):

http://edition.pagesuite-professional.co.uk//launch.aspx?pbid=b553c14a-f023-4ec6-a5ac-b9d745b0d550

 

EDDC “Member Champions” – who are they and what do they DO for US?

EDDC has 16 member Champions

According to the dedicated EDDC web page they:

Each Member Champion keeps a focus on their area of responsibility by:

  • Raising the profile of the issue and showing the communities of East Devon the Council’s commitment to the issue.
  • Fostering the engagement of a wider range of Members in the review and development of the issue.
  • Promoting effective communication and positive working relationships both within the Council and amongst partners, stakeholders and community groups.
  • Promoting the positive work that is being undertaken within the District, both at a regional and national level.
  • Providing positive support, and on occasions constructive challenge, to officers in driving forward the Council’s agenda on the issue.

and

to fulfil their role effective a Member Champion also needs to be able to:

  • foster cross-party co-operation and be able to engage community groups and officers
  • understand and express the opinions and priorities of the community
  • be sensitive to Council priorities; although they may be advocating the opinions of the older people, for example, they should not do so at the expense of Council Policy and Corporate Policies. Champions cannot allow themselves to “go native” and forget about their broader role as a Councillor.
  • Lead and respond to the whole range of issues rather than focussing upon a pet interest.

So, let’s examine them individually:

Asset Management – Bob Buxton (Dunkeswell)

Now, we plebs actually don’t know what happens at Asset Management meetings because they are held in secret with no agendas or minutes. So how do we know what he is championing and why?

Business – Mike Allen (Honiton St Michaels)

The man who was in charge of the second round of Local Plan meetings and doesn’t know how Sidford Fields crept into it. Perhaps kinder to skip this one …..

Culture – John O’Leary (Honiton St Pauls)

This pretty much seems to mean publicising the Thelma Hulbert Gallery at every opportunity – the loss making “asset” that we all own and throw money at and the Beehive in Honiton to which we have ALL contributed so many hundreds of thousands of pounds via EDDC grants.   Oh, and he lets us know what is on at EDDC owned facilities such as the Manor Pavilion – at least I think he does.

Customer Services – Vivien Duvall Steer (Exmouth Halsdon)

Ah, the lady who is presumably standing up for all those of us who won’t be able to get to Skypark. No? Why not?

 Exmouth Town – John Humphries (Exmouth Littleham)

A lot of unhappy people in Littleham these days – which is not at all Little any more.   Plus the demolition of Elizabeth Hall and the “regeneration” of the seafront into money-making businesses is not popular either.

Health and Wellbeing – Peter Sullivan (Sidmouth Town)

Er, anyone know what EDDC is doing for our health and wellbeing?  OK, he does have a Twitter feed where in April he suggested that people take their dogs for a walk! But Googling him doesn’t uncover anything else.

Member Development and Engagement – Maddy Chapman (Exmouth Brixington)

Oh dear, given that our members keep being hauled before the Standards Committee because they are being naughty seems to show that she isn’t having much effect!

Planning, Design and Heritage – Alan Dent (Budleigh)

Anyone want to point out anything he has done to protect our heritage or improve design of buildings – he certainly won’t be able to point to anything about planning given the mess that EDDC is currently in.

Flood Alleviation – Peter Bowden (Broadclyst)

Well, at least he lives in a flood prone area!  But the Chief Executive has taken charge of flood grants.  Hope he gets a look in.

Procurement – Mark Williamson (Exmouth Littleham)

Ah, procurement – another of those things that no-one tells us about. We are not even sure what he oversees about the subject. Procuring Skypark? Paperclips?   Who knows?  We are certainly not allowed to see documents about procurement so quite why WE have a champion for it is a moot point.

Rural Broadband – Mike Howe (Clyst Valley)

Er, not progressing very well at all – some areas of the district barely have a snails pace service and dates for upgrade keep getting pushed back and back. BT appears to have the monopoly. Not sure what he can achieve.

Rural Communities (including Post Offices) – Newton Poppleford and Harpford

Oh dear – the rural community of Newton Poppleford is NOT a happy one – did he stick up for it recently? Er ….

Rural Communities (incorporating Post Offices) – Ken Potter

Anyone see him at the Feniton inquiry or the Colyford Green Wedge? No?  When you read EDDC Minutes he does attend a lot of meetings and reads a lot of Post Office literature.

Seaton Town – Stephanie Jones (Seaton)

Seaton: the town that has more old people than just about anywhere else in the country and which is about to have even more on its “regeneration area” – the one where Tesco can’t afford affordable houses. Promised so much, delivered so little.  I wouldn’t put that on my CV!

Tourism – Sheila Kerridge (Sidmouth Town)

Sheila who? Tourism – East Devon? Surely some mistake, we don’t do tourism we only do building lots of houses in inappropriate places and huge sheds for “employment”.

Youth – Christine Drew (Sidmouth Sidford)

Youth services which are being decimated across the district. I can only refer you to this interview that she had with a work experience person at EDDC. She does “loads” of things but can name only one though she does go to lots of youth clubs (well, that’s about to stop now DCC is closing them all) and, as she says, does have children.

So, there we have it – LOTS of Champions but it seems that really their job is not that of Champion of the People but (at least those whose heads appear above the parapet) instead they do PR for the majority party – but even this some of them do woefully or not at all.

Still, they probably go to a lot of local, regional and national events and have lots of canapés for us.

But what exactly have they achieved for US? Over to you.

What the general public thinks of the “housing crisis”

The BBC has a “Your Say” section on its website and it recently published an article about the housing crisis. Here are the comments which produced the three most popular comments:

We’ve got around 850,000 empty houses in this country. Unfortunately, many of them are in the ‘wrong place’ – in economically deprived areas rather than in the South East. The solution is to regenerate these areas and draw people to them, taking advantage of much cheaper housing in the process. But this would deflate the bubble the govt is anxious to create in the illusion of economic competence.

The problem is the phrase ‘shortage of housing’ always getting linked to lack of building activity. The problem is that over a million homes have been removed from the market by buy-to-let investors who with tax breaks have pushed up prices beyond the means of the people who would normally purchase such properties. That’s your problem

The public have been warning the “experts” for months that the housing market is oveheating despite Osbournes assurances that it wouldn`t. What`s needed is a lot more affordable housing. The “Help to buy” scheme also needs to be downgraded to morgages up to £200,000 and not the current £600,000. If you need help to buy a £600,000 house then you`re over-stretching yourself.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-27459663

They do things differently in Scotland: Councillor suspended for 5 months

Suspended for 5 monthhs for being aggressive to members of the public whilst Chairman of a committee:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-27377867

and

Really interesting if somewhat long – his register of interests dealings are quite something!

http://www.publicstandardscommissioner.org.uk/decisions/decision/419/las1215