DMC meeting: a member of the public reports – CEO Mark Williams told to “get a grip”

“EDDC Chief Executive Mark Williams was bluntly told by a Tory councillor to get a grip on his planning department’s “unacceptable level of performance”.

The barb came from Cllr Mike Allen at today’s Development Management Committee which was given a “progress” report on the Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) which Planning Inspector Anthony Thickett ordered the Council to conduct following his rejection of the Local Plan earlier this year. Originally it was supposed to be completed in June

Several other councillors were angry that the assessment of how many houses the district needs was proceeding at snail’s pace, and will not be ready until next year, implying that the Local Plan cannot be re-submitted until after the 2015 Local Elections.

Independent councillor Ben Ingham said EDDC “lacked a coherent strategy and a timetable for completion” of this crucial research. As a result with no Local Plan in place, it was “open season in the Devon countryside” for developers. He concluded, “It’s a shame that this work was not tackled three years ago.”

The obedient, loyal majority of DMC members were acutely embarrassed by all this, and rapidly passed Sidmouth councillor Peter Sullivan’s motion to “move on”!

PS. Mike Allen has been unflattering before about Mark Williams who was his boss when Allen was a senior officer at South Somerset District Council. At last Summer’s full Council Meeting which discussed the Local Plan, the councillor for Honiton said Williams didn’t understand the National Planning Policy Framework! As a former chair of the Local Plan Panel he speaks with some authority.

Miscellany

From a correspondent:

Two other costs of relocation: the officer time expended on the move is not being costed – £2 million? Richard Cohen doesn’t come cheap. And more importantly, the location of Skypark will mean that the make-up of the workforce will chance dramatically, and is likely in the future to be drawn from outside the District. Exeter mainly, but also Taunton and Newton Abbot/Torbay. This will mean that between £5 and £7 million per annum in wages will be sent outside the District.

Re the Bucks proposition (see post below) and DCC’s proposal 4 (?) years ago. The big problem with the DCC proposal was that they wanted parish councils to be only part elected, with several members being appointed. This would mean the local police officer, nurse and fire officer, unelected, determining planning applications in your street. No thanks. This was a big flaw and lost the confidence of a lot of people. A genuine fresh attempt by DCC and passing power down to local Parish councils in the spirit of localism would be very popular right now. If the Parish councils had power people would stand for them.

And finally, this quote from the blog of Councillor Susie Bond on this afternoon’s DMC meeting we can’t wait for the audio tape of this precis:

“Chair, Cllr Helen Parr, pointed out that the Local Plan was ready as far as EDDC was concerned at the Examination in Public earlier this year, but that it was the Planning Inspector who had asked for more evidence on housing numbers.”

Work that one out!

Buckinghamshire County Council devolves functions (and cash) to clusters of parishes

Interesting idea:

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19739:nalc-welcomes-county-plan-to-hand-services-to-clusters-of-parishes&catid=59&Itemid=27

Now all we need is district council powers devolved to clusters of parishes and we have cracked it.

Oh, wait, that’s what Devon County Council wanted to do when it wanted to unitise but EDDC spent more than £250,000 to try to persuade us not to do it. And one of the first things the new government did was to cancel the project – now it’s flavour of the month!

Probity in Planning

A very useful reference tool – note it says that councils dealing with their own planning applications should be as transparent as when they deal with all other applications:

http://www.pas.gov.uk/documents/332612/1099271/Probity+in+planning+guide/c2463914-db11-4321-8d38-be54c188abbe

Today’s DMC meeting described by one councillor as “tetchy”

See this report by Feniton Councillor Susie Bond about this afternoon’s DMC where it seems only councillors NOT in the AONB were upset about the Local Plan delay.

They voted to “note” the report which basically means throwing up their hands and saying ” there’s nothing we can do but wait and see”.

http://susiebond.wordpress.com/2014/08/26/tetchy-meeting-to-receive-report-on-delay-in-housing-numbers/

EDA Chairman 1 – Leader of East Devon District Council own goal – and a STUNNING revelation!!!!

This morning the Chairman of East Devon Alliance, Paul Arnott, once again went head-to-head with a top EDDC councillor – this time EDDC Council Leader Paul Diviani on the lack of a Local Plan.  The EDA Chairman said that he was not surprised but still disappointed that, having been dealing with this project since 2007, EDDC still is not in a position to put a (third) draft Local Plan forward to the Planning Inspectorate and leaving the district vulnerable to speculative development.  And he comes up with a STUNNING REVELATION why he thinks current research for the Local Plan is wrong and the reason why it is being held up.  Read on …

Councillor Diviani trod the well-worn track of saying that there really is nothing to worry about – EDDC has so far won more than 70% of its appeals and (occasionally) says no to developers.  The EDA Chairman noted that it is NOT EDDC alone that champions these appeals – particularly in the case of Feniton and Seaton, where it was local people who raised funds and made their case to inspectors, so implying that EDDC alone does this is somewhat disingenuous.

However, then came the total shock.  You may recall that two sets of consultants employed by EDDC before the last iteration of the Local Plan said that they thought that around 12,000 homes should be built in the district.   EDDC (and, it has to be said members of the East Devon Business Forum and developers, sometimes the same thing) said, no, no – this could not be right and at least 15,000 homes were needed – which is what got put in the draft put before the Inspector.

The Inspector threw out the plan, specifically saying that he could see no back-up research that confirmed the 15,000 number that EDDC came up with.

And what does Leader Diviani say to this – if we take his interview at face value believing that he is being topical  we could read it as THREE sets of consultants coming to around the same figure but we must assume he is talking about the two reports?  He says, no no – they CANNOT be right.  The government wants us to build more houses, we NEED more houses so we are going to “look at the figures again” because they must be “realistic”.

HOW MORE REALISTIC CAN YOU GET THAT TWO DIFFERENT SETS OF CONSULTANTS COMING TO THE SAME CONCLUSION THAT WE NEED 11,000 – 12,000 NEW HOMES AND NOT 15,000?

So, here we have it – Councillor Diviani thinks he is more expert than consultants and will not give up until – presumably – another set of consultants comes up with the figure that he and the government want.  A figure not based on evidence.  As usual – fire the arrow, then draw the bulls-eye around it.

So, we ask ourselves:  where did the figure of 15,000 that Councillor Diviani so desperately wants come from?  Developers?  Out of thin air?  from the Government which has told us (via the NPPF) to come up with LOCAL figures backed up with LOCAL evidence?

Some very, very, trenchant questions need to be asked.  Not least by our councillors and, particularly, by Councillor Diviani

Source:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p024pn5v

(THE INTERVIEW IS 2 HOURS 6 MIN AT 8.38 AM)

 

“Informed, considered, proportionate, fair and necessary” …

Under a heading “Making decisions that are lawful and fair for East Devon’s communities” in this week’s Knowledge e-newspaper the following information appears.

Notwithstanding that it reads as if the publication is implying that the PUBLIC might find itself in trouble here when it is actually the local authority, read this in the context of the move from easily accessible Sidmouth to almost totally inaccessible Skypark and see if you see a problem for EDDC. Particularly with regard to one of the last paragraphs where it says that actions can be taken by councils only if they are: informed, considered, proportionate, fair and necessary.

As a council it is important that we represent the wide-ranging needs, views and aspirations of our communities. We have a higher than average older population with over 28% of the population being aged 65 and over and with many people living in rural isolation.

In the 2011 Census 10.3% of people in East Devon said they were carers, with 21% of people

Reported as having a disability/long-term health problem . Women make up 52% of East Devon’s population.

65 .6% said they were Christian, 25.1% had no religion, and many other religions/beliefs made up 1.1%.

Ethnic minority communities reported a slight increase to 1.6% since the last Census.

When making decisions, it’s not only important to consider how different people will be affected but it is a legal requirement under the Equality Act 2010 Public Sector Equality Duty.

This is because people have diverse needs and may be disadvantaged by something we do.

A disadvantage could result in them having poor access to services and information which could affect their health, wellbeing and opportunities to achieve their own potential.

Therefore, there is an economic and cost benefit to considering the effects of decisions on diverse communities.

East Devon has a good track record for promoting equality and supporting diverse communities.

To reduce the risk of court challenges and the associated legal costs , need to be aware of the following:

When making decisions, the Equality Act 2010 Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) requires you to give due regard to the need to:

Eliminate discrimination, harassment and victimisation.

Advance equality by encouraging participation, removing disadvantage, taking account of disabilities and meeting people’s needs.

Foster good relations between people by tackling prejudice and promoting understanding.

Questions to ask when making decisions:

Taking into account people’s ages, disabilities, race/ethnicity (includes Gypsies and Travellers), gender/gender identity, religions and beliefs (includes people who have ‘no belief’ and atheists) or sexual orientation, pregnant women/new mothers, marriage/civil partnership status and any other factor you consider relevant such as caring responsibilities, rural isolation or socio-economic disadvantage…

Who might be affected by the proposal or issue?

Have stakeholders been consulted adequately and what was their feedback?

Have diverse needs and community impacts been considered fully?

For example, is an appropriate impact assessment provided?

What supporting information (needs assessment/profiles etc.) is provided by officers and is this sufficient and robust?

In what way could the proposal or issue under consideration benefit certain groups of people?

Are there any opportunities for further improvement , particularly for disabled people?

In what way could the proposal or issue under consideration disadvantage certain groups of

people? For example, could it result in discrimination, poor or worse access, outcomes or community relations?

Are any negative impacts/disadvantages necessary, reasonable and proportionate?

What are the risks of going ahead/not going ahead with the proposal and how can these risks be managed?

Is there an alternative, less disadvantageous option?

Are there mitigations in place to address negative impacts?

Can we make a decision on the basis of the information given to us?

Chairpersons should make sure there is a record (minute) of the attention given to the PSED when making decisions or carrying out a scrutiny Function.

One final point, equality is not about …

Favouring particular groups above others, although there are provisions in the Equality Act to allow organisations to advance equality by taking ‘positive action’ to achieve more equal outcomes for groups which are disadvantaged and a duty to make reasonable adjustments for disabled people.

Preventing councils from making difficult decisions which may result in the closure or reduction of a service, provided such decisions are informed, considered, proportionate, fair and necessary.

Banning words like “blackboard” “because it’s racist” (it isn’t).

Source: http://www.eastdevon.gov.uk/220814_the_knowledge_issue_15.pdf

 

 

 

 

 

Important issues being debated this week: today (Tuesday) and Thursday

See above for details of the DMC meeting this afternoon where the lack of a 5 (and 6) year land supply will be “debated”

note that you can video, record, photograph, tweet or email about this meeting in real time, provided that you do not upset the participants

and

check out the First Tier tribunal case:

Information Commissioner v East Devon District Council,

Thursdy 28 August 2014 at 10 am in Court 3 of Exeter Magistrates Court

(taking notes at this meeting is allowed but no other form of recording)

where the important decision on how much information EDDC can keep secret about its relocation to Skypark will be (eventually) decided

A public authority, the requester or both can appeal against the Information Commissioner’s decision notice. [This is what EDDC has done].

If the Tribunal decides that the Commissioner’s decision was wrong in law, or that he exercised his discretion wrongly, it can overturn the decision and issue a substitute decision notice. This decision notice has the same legal status as the first one. Like the Commissioner, the Tribunal can only consider questions relevant to the Act, not any wider dispute that may arise from the request.

Appeals may be by oral hearing, where witnesses give evidence in person. If the evidence can be presented entirely in writing, the appeal will be decided on the basis of those documents.

Source: http://ico.org.uk/for_organisations/freedom_of_information/guide/complaints#what-happens-when-someone-complains-6

East Devon venues host Rugby World Cup teams

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Rugby-World-Cup-coming-Exeter-Devon-venues-host/story-22820123-detail/story.html

Aren’t we lucky they are coming now before areas around these venues are surrounded by housing estates.