Councillor vows to challenge Police Commissioner

The Chair of the EDDC Overview and Scrutiny Committee, Littleham Councillor Tim Wood, told his Committee on Thursday 11th September that he shares the widespread frustration and dismay at the failure of the Council to pursue an enquiry into the Business Forum.

He vowed to raise the issue with the Police Commissioner Tony Hogg at the earliest opportunity.

In answer to a public question, Councillor Wood said that he had been given “very firm legal advice” that the enquiry could not be permitted to reconvene until after the Devon and Cornwall Police had completed their investigations into alleged malpractice by ex-Councillor Graham Brown.

Sidmouth citizen Robert Crick advised Councillor Wood that 18 months after the Chief Executive Mark Williams had referred the case to the police, Mr Brown has still not been charged or even questioned, despite volunteering to meet the police.

Mr Crick claimed that Mr Brown was being used as a scapegoat to prevent inquiries into deep systemic problems in the way the Cabinet and Senior Officers had been operating. It seemed that Mr Brown had done nothing illegal and the case should now be closed.

Mr Crick suggested that the legal advice given to the chair might not be impartial or independent and that a second opinion might be needed to enable the formal enquiry into the Business Forum’s dealings to proceed.

“In the interest of fairness and justice, Graham Brown should be brought in from the wilderness, and given a chance to clear his name” asserted Mr Crick.

The fourth meeting of the Business “Task and Finish Forum” was postponed at short notice in early September 2013. This formal enquiry had been launched a year before to investigate public concerns about the possible abuse of power by the East Devon Business Forum and allegations of influence behind closed doors in the production of the now discredited Local Development Plan.

It had made little progress before it was suspended a year later.

Skypark “realising the full economic potential of Exeter” …

So says Alder King, the company marketing the site on Rightmove HERE

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/commercial-property-to-let/property-47604236.html/svr/1119;jsessionid=36322F4BFF5D15AED9C64DC02D3526D9?premiumA=true

The vision for the site is to realise the full economic potential of Exeter as a major regional centre, providing a range of employment opportunities and highlighting the area as a self-sufficient new urban community. A community offering people the ability to live in a much sought-after part of the country in close proximity to where the majority of new jobs will be provided.”

Three Dorset councils in merger talks

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-29205950

Skypark starts to make sense but only in strategic terms, not in terms of residents needs.

What is quite shocking is that, if mergers save so much money, why was the extra tier created in the first place.

One suspects the word “localism” would have been bandied about in the 70s when it was happening, but now the buzz phrase = “economic growth and efficiency” to explain why mergers are needed.

One might then conclude that you can’t have localism AND economic growth and efficiency!

South-West house prices higher than pre-recession peak

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-29218870

And the Catch-22: the more new, expensive houses we build the higher the figure climbs.

Greenfield sites, pretty locations in the countryside = high prices and little chance of affordable homes

Brownfield sites in urban areas = lower prices and greater chance of affordable homes

Developers prefer greenfield, bigger profits. No incentive to build on brownfield sites.

Recipe for disaster?

Fettering discretion in the planning process

EDDC current constitution page 196

Do be aware that you are likely to have fettered your discretion where the Council is the landowner, developer or applicant and you have acted as, or could be perceived as being, a chief advocate for the proposal. (This is more than a matter of membership of both the proposing and planning determination committees, but that through your significant personal involvement in preparing or advocating the proposal you will be, or perceived by the public as being, no longer able to act impartially or to determine the proposal purely on its planning merits.)

and page 197:

Don’t speak and vote on a proposal where you have fettered your discretion. You do not also have to withdraw, but you may prefer to do so for the sake of appearances.

 Do explain that you do not intend to speak and vote because you have or you could reasonably be perceived as having judged (or reserve the right to judge) the matter elsewhere, so that this may be recorded in the minutes.

 Do take the opportunity to exercise your separate speaking rights as a Ward/Local Member where you have represented your views or those of local electors and fettered your discretion, provided you do not have a disclosable pecuniary interest.. Where you do exercise these speaking rights:
– advise the proper officer or Chairman that you wish to speak in this capacity before commencement of the item;
– remove yourself from the Member seating area for the duration of that item; and
– ensure that your actions are recorded.

…..
Be aware that you should not speak or vote on any matter which you have discussed at Cabinet unless you have demonstrated there and can do so at the relevant planning meeting that you have not predetermined the application. …

…Do not take part in any planning meeting on a matter in which you may have been seen as advocating a proposal as a Cabinet Member.

So, we build more homes – who then buys them?

According to a report from the National Housing Federation, only an “exclusive members club” will be able to afford houses:

http://www.housing.org.uk/media/press-releases/homeownership-is-becoming-an-exclusive-members-club/

As for “affordable” homes, they should be no more than 80% of the cost of owning or renting a home on the open market.

If a home costs £200,000 and rents for £800 a nonth that would be £160,000 and £660 a month. But if a home costs £400,000 and rents for £2000 a month then that’s £ £320,000 and £1,600 a month. It is not based on what people can afford, just a simple mathematical formula.

So, why are we building more and more expensive properties in East Devon?

From one of our correspondents: “Greater Exeter”?

Interesting response from Peter Whitfield to the piece on local government reorganisation.

Take a look at the current ‘dispute’ between Hull City Council and East Riding District Council, which is getting quite nasty.

http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/Head-Hull-boundary-commission-border/story-22926385-detail/story.html

Hull want to take a chunk of East Riding, and the parallels with Exeter and East Devon are obvious.

The case for Exeter taking control of the growth point area is strong, and we know that Exeter is ambitious for expansion both economically and politically. They wanted to become a unitary council, and also had aspirations to absorb Exmouth. EDDC, in political turmoil, having made a colossal mess of the Local Plan, and now proposing a very unpopular relocation, look like sitting ducks. EDDC is the largest District Council in Devon, and one of the largest by population in the country. Exeter City Council are well regarded, and have the highly rated Karime Hassan ex EDDC) in charge as Chief Executive: the call for devolution following the Scottish referendum will surely be an opportunity to trigger an attempted snatch of territory from EDDC.

The Growth Point is already a joint enterprise between various authorities and is widely perceived as an extension to the economic zone of Exeter. Its political and economic orientation is completely dominated by its proximity to and relationship with the City.

I have often wondered at the way in which East Devon’s boundaries are arranged, with Pinhoe, so obviously part of Exeter, being included, and areas to the north and east of Exeter bizarrely being administered by EDDC.

Of course, once the loss of the Growth Point is conceded, the next issue is where would the new boundaries of the City be set? Presumably, Cranbrook would be included in Greater Exeter.

More weasel words?

A report, by the IPPR North think-tank, calls for a ‘metro mayors’ for city regions, and would give greater powers to vary taxes to local councils.

Eric Pickles said:

“The Coalition government has delivered significant devolution of power and finance to local communities and there is real scope to go further in England.

“However, localism in England should be about devolving power to the lowest appropriate level – down to councils, to neighbourhoods and to individuals. There may be some role for combined authorities on a strategic level to promote economic development and transport, but there is a real risk they will suck power upwards away from local councils and local taxpayers.

“Nor should localism be a fig leaf for hitting hard-working people with a new range of municipal stealth taxes. Creating new taxes, more politicians and new tiers of local administration is not the answer – the starting point should be increasing local democracy and local accountability.”

Er, what about localism not actually working in any way, shape or form – where do we go then?

Can you farm on 20 acres?

It would seem so  to a layman:

Cornwall, 26 acres without house:

http://farmsandestatessearch.savills.co.uk/property-detail/GBETRUEXR140093/list

Pasture land Pyworthy 15 acres

http://www.uklandandfarms.co.uk/rural-property-for-sale/south-west/devon/holsworthy-bodd4gqs/

Organic pasture 23.83 acres Tiverton

http://www.uklandandfarms.co.uk/rural-property-for-sale/south-west/devon/holsworthy-bodd4gqs/

Pasture and woodland Umberleigh 25 acres

http://www.uklandandfarms.co.uk/rural-property-for-sale/south-west/devon/umberleigh-24695214/

Axminster 11.31 acres pasture

http://www.uklandandfarms.co.uk/rural-property-for-sale/south-west/devon/40472_hon140175/

23 acres pasture Barnstaple

http://www.uklandandfarms.co.uk/rural-property-for-sale/south-west/devon/kentisbury_barnstaple-38189_38336/

Poultry farm 19.88 acres Tiverton

http://www.uklandandfarms.co.uk/rural-property-for-sale/south-west/devon/39456_tar100008/

Agricultural land and pasture, Tiverton 16.25 acres

http://www.uklandandfarms.co.uk/rural-property-for-sale/south-west/devon/39456_tar100008/

Agricultural purposes, Barnstaple 14.87 acres

http://www.uklandandfarms.co.uk/rural-property-for-sale/south-west/devon/52743_stm130248/

Arable pasture land with farm buildings 18.58 acres Tiverton

http://www.uklandandfarms.co.uk/rural-property-for-sale/south-west/devon/40529_tiv130157/

 

 

 

 

 

What housebuilders think of the NPPF

No surprises – they LOVE it:

http://centrallobby.politicshome.com/latestnews/article-detail/newsarticle/no-rollback-on-nppf-say-builders/

Surrey group starts new political party in response to planning issues

http://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/surrey-news/guildford-green-belt-group-plans-7352422

The Scottish referendum and Skypark: what links them?

The Scottish vote on Thursday has significant implications for the proposed move of EDDC to Skypark.

This follows the recent strong performance of the ‘Yes’ campaign, who may well win, but have in any event secured huge concessions from the Westminster establishment. The choice is now between full independence and ‘devo max’, a further massive transfer of powers to the Scottish Assembly.

All parties are now agreed that the existing constitutional arrangements are dead in the water, and that widespread reform is inevitable with a transfer of powers away from Westminster. In a sense, a logical extension of the popular policy of ‘localism’.

Regardless of Thursday’s vote, Wales and Northern Ireland will be given more powers, and there is likely to be an English Parliament. This may be located away from London, in Birmingham or the North, but is more likely to be housed at Westminster, with only English MPs sitting to determine English issues.

The English regions will be included in this anti-centrist, anti-Westminster process, but a repeat of the maligned and unsuccessful regional assemblies of the last Labour government is highly unlikely. Power is going to be devolved to lower tiers of government, and in our neck of the woods that means Devon County Council.

As part of this transfer of power and general constitutional and administrative upheaval, the number of tiers of government will be closely examined. The continuation of District Councils is highly questionable. Whilst County Councils will have the viability to administer more powers, there will be huge demands to counter their power with a transfer of local decision-making to Parish level. In particular, planning. This is the essence of localism, and government generally is well aware of the popular demand for people to have a greater say over what happens in their neighbourhood.

And of course, having three tiers of local government is widely seen as overly complicated and expensive. Hence the decision to make Cornwall a unitary authority. So District Councils are looking like they are heading for the chop.

Scottish voters have been promised constitutional reform in a great hurry, with legislation scheduled for just after the May 2015 elections. Reform to the English system will either be at the same time or very soon afterwards.

At the very moment when District Councils are likely to cease to exist, here in EDDC we will be committing to a £20 million new HQ. The ultimate white elephant.

And what will be the value of the new building, when it has to be sold? Surely no more than £2-3 million. We already know that there is no demand for offices at Skypark, or anywhere else in East Devon for that matter. And especially for a new building purpose designed to house our District Council.

In these circumstances will the residents elsewhere in Devon be prepared to stomach the losses incurred by East Devon politicians. Or will the £17 million loss be transferred to East Devon’s parish councils, saddling them with debt for a generation?

Devon should have one elected mayor says Nick Clegg

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Devon-Cornwall-Someret-elected-mayors-devolution/story-22916271-detail/story.html

Daisy the Cow

An interesting couple of comments on Councillor Claire Wright’s blog in response to a post by EDDC Conservative Whip, Phil Twiss, who pointed out to a commentator that he had got the wrong property when questioning that disgraced ex-councillor Graham Brown was still farming when he said he all but gave it up more than 10 years ago:

…..”10. At 06:19 pm on 11th Sep Damien Mills wrote:

Sincere thanks to Cllr Twiss for pointing out my error.

On this occasion, he’s quite correct; I did, inadvertently, confuse Ware Farm with Ware Farm house. However, further investigation reveals Mr Brown’s property is on the market – but not for £385,000 as I had mistakenly thought but, rather, a cool £1,550,000:

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-41090060.html

What is more, all my other points remain. So, essentially, it seems Mr Brown is looking to his friends at OSMTC / EDDC to help him secure the certificate of lawfulness without which it will, one assumes, be very difficult, if not impossible, for him to sell Ware Farm. That aside, it’s reassuring to know that Cllr Twiss is such an avid reader of this blog and will, of course, be duty bound to report back what he has learnt on here to the planning department at EDDC before it considers Mr Brown’s application.

Indeed, given the controversies surrounding Mr Brown, one must assume that Cllr Twiss and his fellow Tories will go the extra mile to ensure there can be no suggestion of any impropriety in the way EDDC deals with this application from their former colleague.

Once again, thanks for your help Phil, it really is very much appreciated!

11. At 08:19 pm on 11th Sep Sandra Semple wrote:

From the particulars:

“A barn with open yard area measuring 10m x 15m with a self filling trough provides ideal space for wintering young horses, there is an isolation stable measuring 3.6m x 3.6m in the corner of this barn.

The adjacent barn currently (sic) houses cattle and is 15m wide by 17m long and has a self filling water trough and an external feed trough along the short side of the building.

There is an open fronted 45m x 15m pole barn currently used for straw and hay. The field behind the house has a useful field shelter.”

Currently houses cattle? Agricultural business? Or just family pets?”

A correspondent mentions that the land may be sub-let – but surely, in that case, the owner would still be conducting an agricultural business.

Former Hon Sec of East Devon Business Forum reappears at Knowle meeting

Well, would you believe it!? At tonight’s O&S meeting, Nigel Harrison put in a surprise appearance. Business Information Point (BIP) gave a presentation on why they are worth a grant from EDDC and several councillors asked questions regarding the type of businesses, number of start ups, etc that they dealt with, without a shred of deep questioning about value for money.

Then Cllr Newth commented that she had been in discussion with a Sidmouth business which was having difficulties. Within days of suggesting they contact Nigel Harrison, he had visited this business and given three possible avenues they could pursue. One could almost think … no … no … not an orchestrated presentation surely? (And one Sidmouth business which doesn’t seem to have benefitted is Trumpers).

Now, as seems he has been missing from any council meeting and not mentioned on any agenda for eighteen months or more (ever since the demise of the East Devon Business Forum of which he was the very, very busy Hon Sec), presumably this nugget of information was meant to demonstrate that he had been beavering away on behalf of local businesses. However, has anyone seen any reports or other evidence of his work output? What have we been paying him for? Now that the East Devon Business Forum is defunct, how has he been filling his time?

And is it a coincidence that he reappears on the day the EDBF TAFF is officially buried?

RIP East Devon Business Forum Task and Finish Forum

The Forward Plan for the EDDC Overview and Scrutiny Committee no longer mentions the reconvening of the TAFF which was to have investigated the influence of EDBF on the (non) delivery of the Local Plan.

The CEO squashed it, delaying it until after submission of the draft Local Plan (though this was never discussed or agreed at any public meeting).

Now it has been airbrushed out of history.

Why?

Caption competition: Graham Brown and the donkey in his barn

http://www.thedonkeysanctuary.org.uk/blog/2233

Well, we wouldn’t be able to keep a donkey in our back garden ….. we could keep it on a farm though!

Unfortunately, we can’t copy the photograph in the link – it is probably copyright to the Donkey Sanctuary.

Cash-strapped Devon developer gets £4 million Government help …

Including in Axminster …

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Devon-home-builder-receive-4m-Government-growth/story-22904474-detail/story.html