Where can children play in our towns and cities?

” ... Throughout the country, they become prisoners of bad design, and so do adults. Without safe and engaging places in which they can come together, no tribe forms. So parents must play the games that children would otherwise play among themselves, and everyone is bored to tears.

The exclusion of children arises from the same pathology that denies us decent housing. In the name of market freedom, the volume housebuilders, sitting on their land banks, are free to preside over speculative chaos, while we are free to buy dog kennels priced like palaces in placeless estates so badly designed that community is dead on arrival. Many want to design and build their own homes, but almost no plots are available, as the big builders have seized them. …”

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jan/06/children-towns-and-cities-robbed-spaces-play

Air pollution alert in the South West this week

..and a cautionary tale about the downside of development, from China.
(There’s no such thing as a cheap t-shirt) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6X2uwlQGQM

Topsham Care Home plans to go to planning inspection

Very similar to Knowle?

Exeter City Council was minded to refuse but it did not determine the application within the required time so it goes straight to inspection.

PLANS for a 60 -bed care home and a mix of assisted living flats and age restricted homes in Topsham are to be decided by the planning inspector.

The scheme by Waddeton Park has attracted more than 450 letters of objection.

PLANS for a 60 -bed care home and a mix of assisted living flats and age restricted homes in Topsham are to be decided by the planning inspector.

The scheme by Waddeton Park has attracted more than 450 letters of objection.”

Read more: http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Topsham-homes-battle-goes-planning-inspector/story-26206103-detail/story.html

Questions for the Local Plan

When maximum, minimum and average figures were compiled why was maximum chosen, as maximums can be skewed.

Why was the final figure designated as the MINIMUM number to be built if maximum numbers were chosen?

Where are these houses to be built: sites for such numbers are not identified nor the number of houses per site. This will encourage very large initial developments with no ability to refuse (aaah). Only Clyst St Mary seems to have designated (large) numbers.

Where is the Community Infrastructure Levy document which specifies the cost per square metre of development to support local and district-wide infrastructure for these massive increases?

What is our current 5/6 year land supply?

With the future of the inter-modal freight terminal uncertain why is this not designated as extra employment land?