Gypsy and Traveller Policy modified

The Government has revised its special planning policy for Travellers to state that it will only apply to those “who lead a genuine travelling lifestyle”.

Ministers said this would mean that any application for a permanent site, including caravan sites, by someone who does not travel will be considered in the same way as an application from the settled population.

The new policy, published by the Department for Communities and Local Government, is also intended to shore up Green Belt and other protections.

It states that if a local planning authority cannot demonstrate an up–to-date 5-year supply of deliverable sites, this should be a significant material consideration in any subsequent planning decision when considering applications for the grant of temporary planning permission.
An exception is where the proposal is on land designated as:

Green Belt;

sites protected under the Birds and Habitats Directives;
sites designated as Sites of Special Scientific Interest;
Local Green Space;

an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty;

within a National Park (or the Broads).

The policy states that inappropriate development is harmful to the Green Belt and should not be approved, except in very special circumstances.

“Traveller sites (temporary or permanent) in the Green Belt are inappropriate development,” it says. “Subject to the best interests of the child, personal circumstances and unmet need are unlikely to clearly outweigh harm to the Green Belt and any other harm so as to establish very special circumstances.”

The revised policy also says: “In exceptional cases, where a local planning authority is burdened by a large-scale unauthorised site that has significantly increased their need, and their area is subject to strict and special planning constraints, then there is no assumption that the local planning authority is required to plan to meet their traveller site needs in full.”

The DCLG claimed the new policy made clear the need to ensure fairness in the system, with planning policy reflecting the requirement that caravan sites should be made available for those who travel permanently.

Communities Secretary Greg Clark said: “I’m determined to ensure fairness in the planning system, so everyone abides by the same rules.

“Today’s new policy strengthens the hand of councils to tackle unauthorised development in their area, ensures all communities are treated equally and that the protection of the Green Belt is enforceable.”

Housing and Planning Minister Brandon Lewis said: “Unauthorised traveller sites can blight communities, causing misery for their neighbours and creating resentment that planning rules don’t seem to be applied fairly.
“Today’s revised planning policy clearly sets out the protection against unauthorised occupation and that the rules apply fairly to every community equally – no ifs, no buts.”

Garden Court Chambers’ Marc Willers QC, who advises Gypsies, Travellers and Roma, warned on Twitter that the new planning policy was “short-sighted” and bound to result in more unauthorised camping. “To what end?” he said.

http://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24204:dclg-restricts-planning-policy-for-travellers-to-those-qwho-genuinely-travelq&catid=63&Itemid=31

China slowdown affecting British firms

Whither now EDDC’s “high growth strategy”?

http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/sep/01/uk-manufacturing-jobs-data-chinese-slowdown

Doubts cast on the effect of welfare reforms on unemployment

… “On closer investigation it is also apparent that the larger than average reductions in unemployment in the places hit hardest by welfare reform also happened in previous economic upturns. This makes it impossible to attribute recent trends to welfare reform.”

While the jobless total is lower than it was in 2012, the report pointed out “in the UK economic growth accelerated from mid-2012 onwards after a period of stagnation in the wake of the 2008/9 recession, at much the same time as several of the welfare reforms took effect”, adding that it was “wrong to assume” that the rise in employment and the fall in unemployment could be “attributed in whole or in part to welfare reform”.

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Welfare-reform-does-lead-higher-employment-new/story-27713735-detail/story.html

Councils increasing fees to cover shortfalls

Fees increase as cuts bite

The Economist examines how central government departments and local councils have raised the amount they charge for services in the face of continuing cuts.

Recent innovations include increased fees for social-care users over the four years from 2009-10.

Income from cemetery, cremation and mortuary services went up by 11.4% in the same period, according to the IFS.

The paper also notes that fees for services such as green waste collection are creeping in; hours of free parking are shortening; and leisure centres are getting more expensive.

The Economist, Page: 21, 22

Local Government Association warns on more cuts

£10 billion extra cost pressures on local services by 2020, councils warn ahead of spending review
LGA media release 1 September 2015

Councils will face almost £10 billion of cost pressures by 2020, comprehensive new Local Government Association analysis ahead of the Spending Review reveals today.

As part of its detailed submission to the Treasury ahead of the November Spending Review, the LGA has calculated government policies to be implemented over the next five years will cost councils £6.3 billion by 2020.

It projects this is on top of the extra £3.6 billion of “business as usual” pressures to maintain services at their current level based on demand-led and inflation pressures on local government services.

The LGA, which speaks for more than 370 councils in England and Wales, is warning the Chancellor that failing to fully consider these unfunded cost burdens in the Spending Review could result in important local services being scaled back or lost altogether.

Cost pressures include:

Exempting house builders from Section 106 & Community Infrastructure Levy payments – used to fund infrastructure to support new developments – for 200,000 new starter homes for first-time buyers. An average S106 payment of £15,000 per home would see £3 billion lost over the course of the parliament.
Reducing rents paid by social housing tenants by 1 per cent a year will cost councils £2.6 billion – this is planned revenue to improve and maintain social housing stock and is the equivalent cost of building an average of 19,000 new homes.
Setting aside £1.75 billion to cover the high volume of business rate appeals expected when the 2017 revaluation is introduced.
Rolling out Universal Credit for previous housing benefit claimants will make it difficult for councils to collect overpayment debts worth up to £1 billion.
Introducing the National Living Wage for council staff and care workers over the age of 25 will cost councils £834 million a year by 2019/20.
Increased National Insurance contributions of £797 million a year following the end of state pension contracted out arrangements in 2016.
Meeting the growing gap between what care self-funders and England’s 37 County Councils’ Network member councils pay care home providers is estimated to cost £630 million. On a population basis, the LGA projects the cost impact on England would be roughly double that.

The additional £172 million annual cost of carrying out higher numbers of Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards assessments following a Supreme Court judgement last year.
Treating growing cases of tree disease and pests, such as Chalara ash dieback and oak processionary moths, to cost upwards of £100 million.

The LGA’s submission also identifies further areas where additional costs will be incurred but are difficult to quantify. These include changes to support for failed asylum seekers and unaccompanied child asylum seekers, freezing Local Housing Allowance, the benefit cap, increased demand for children’s services, increasing waste recycling targets and the 75 per cent of leisure centres across the country in need of refurbishment.

The Spending Review must be about “spending smarter, not only about spending less” in order to balance the nation’s books while improving public services and local economies, the LGA said.

LGA Chairman Cllr Gary Porter said:

“November’s Spending Review will be critical for the future of our public services over the next decade. Our new analysis shows the significant spending pressures facing councils over the next few years even before the possibility of further funding reductions.

“Leaving councils to pick up the bill for new national policies while being handed further spending reductions cannot be an option.

“Enormous pressure will be heaped on already stretched local services if the Government fails to fully assess the impact of these unfunded cost burdens when making its spending decisions for the next five years. Vital services, such as caring for the elderly, protecting children, collecting bins, filling potholes and maintaining our parks and green spaces, will simply struggle to continue at current levels.

“We need the decisions in the Spending Review to be guided by the fundamental principle that local people will know best how to spend money on services in their area.

“If our public services are to survive the next five years, councils need fairer funding and the freedom to pay for them. Only radical reform of the way public money is spent and widespread devolution of transport, housing, skills and health and social care across England in the Spending Review can protect the services which bind our communities together and protect our most vulnerable.”

http://www.local.gov.uk/web/guest/media-releases/-/journal_content/56/10180/7455521/NEWS#sthash.f8JKokEP.dpuf