Never mind the quality- feel the (weight of) the pages!

In response to my recent plea for Watch Readers to submit articles (to eastdevonwatch@gmail.com ), Owl has just received this:

The latest round of consultation on the local plan ends on 30 September, see previous Watch article:

Further evidence for the Local Plan and EDDC tries to pass the buck to the National Trust and Woodland Trust for required open spaces

Readers may not have had time, or indeed may never have the time, to look at the paper deluge Ed Freeman has sent to Inspector Thickett this time around. It comprises a covering letter from Ed; a summary report and 13 supporting papers all of which amount to over 1,000 pages!

It’s the latest attempt by EDDC to try to convince Mr Thickett that 17,100 (minimum) is the right housing target over the next 18 years; that we have a 5+ year land supply in East Devon, despite what the Developers’ say; that none of this building will have an adverse effect on our rare landscape and habitats (all we need is collective membership of the National Trust (see above); and to carry out some belated consultations and box ticking exercises.

There are:

6 papers on housing delivery;
2 papers on housing numbers;
an overdue Habitat Assessment

plus the republishing of

2 supporting papers,
one commissioned by the National Trust
the other for Cranbrook;

and, finally,

2 papers on a sustainability box ticking exercise.

There are also two public consultations in progress: one on Gypsy sites the other on village Built Up Area Boundaries (BUABs).

All this should have been done in preparation of the Draft Plan years ago [at least in 2011 and possibly earlier when “The Local Development Framework Panel” was spending its time, under ex-Councillor Brown, mostly visiting sites of interest to the East Devon Business Forum – ed].

So is this the action of a Local Planning Authority confident in what it is doing – or does it have the feel someone desperately trying to play catch-up?

Four consultancy contractors have been employed to write these papers during August 2015.

Hard cases are hard to sell.

Dear Reader, it is all being done in your name, guess who is footing the bill!

Hugo Swire, arms salesman – surely not?

Revealed after a Freedom of Information request:

“I bet you never thought that one of the duties of a foreign minister is to act as an arms dealer for private companies to dodgy governments, or that Royal Navy warships act as floating sales offices for arms-deals. But last June, Hugo Swire MP, a foreign office minister, had a week-long trip to Latin America, which included a stop in Colombia to act as an official weapons salesman for arms firm BAE Systems.

The meeting—part of which took place on a Royal Navy ship—was revealed earlier this year. Full details of the event were supplied to me last month under the Freedom of Information Act.” …

” … The documents say the ship was there for “defense and security exports.” With help from the UK’s government-run arms sales unit, called “UK Trade and Industry Defence & Security Organisation,” Hugo Swire used the ship to push the proposed deal. In the papers released to me, The British Ambassador to Colombia, Lindsay Croisdale-Appleby says, “the visiting HMS Portland gave a spectacular setting for an evening reception for senior members of the Colombian navy and defense ministry.” At the meeting, “The minister highlighted a proposal by BAE Systems to supply Ocean Patrol Vessels to the Colombian Navy.”

http://www.vice.com/read/a-british-defence-minister-acted-as-an-arms-dealer-to-colombia-849

Yes, we all know that arms dealing takes place – but do government ministers have to be the salesmen and the Royal Navy has to be used as a sales office?

The Skypark debacle: a bit more information

Why is officer time NEVER costed?
How come the developer didn’t know the implication of EU regulations from the start?

these, and many other questions, remain a mystery:

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/relocation_to_skypark#comment-63210

A few tips for the Colyton and Colyford Neighbourhood Plan

First of all, a useful link to what EXACTLY is the role of a town or parish council in the formation of a Neighbourhood Plan

What is the role of a parish or town council in neighbourhood planning?


In a designated neighbourhood area which contains all or part of the administrative area of a town or parish council, the town or parish council is responsible for neighbourhood planning.

Where a parish or town council chooses to produce a neighbourhood plan or Order it should work with other members of the community who are interested in, or affected by, the neighbourhood planning proposals to allow them to play an active role in preparing a neighbourhood plan or Order.

The relationship between any group and the formal functions of the town or parish council should be transparent to the wider public. For example it should be clear whether a steering group or other body is a formal sub-committee of the parish or town council. The terms of reference for a steering group or other body should be published and the minutes of meetings made available to the public.

http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/blog/guidance/neighbourhood-planning/who-leads-neighbourhood-planning-in-an-area/

And this website will be useful to those who are not entirely certain that the parish council has grasped what transparency means:

http://www.ourneighbourhoodplanning.org.uk/

From which we glean the following information:

Examination by a suitably qualified independent person:

The neighbourhood plan examination is one of the most important stages of the process. The plan must be examined by a suitably qualified independent person who does not have an interest in any land that may be affected by the neighbourhood plan. The examiners role is to test the plan against the basic conditions and ensure the legislative requirements have been met. Following the examination a report will be issued which will include a recommendation on whether the plan should proceed to referendum.
Here are some top tips on how to make the process of appointing an examiner as smooth as possible:
• Remember the Local Planning Authority (LPA) is responsible for appointing the examiner and paying for the cost of the examination. However, the qualifying body must agree with the appointment. It is the responsibility of the LPA to ensure the examiner:

a) is independent of the qualifying body and the authority,
b) does not have an interest in any land that may be affected by the draft order, and
c) has appropriate qualifications and experience.

Given the extensive interest in land that Colyton Council and Feoffees have, this appointment will be crucial.

Rolle College site: 100 houses, 1 small community building

A double-whammy for Exmouth as the traditional seafront and the further education site are sacrificed to housing with little useful infrastructure for the community.

The public exhibition is 3pm-8pm on Friday, October 2, and 10am-2pm on Saturday October 3, at Ocean on The Esplanade

“One hundred new homes could cover almost the entire former Rolle College campus, with a ‘community hub’ idea reduced to just a single building under new plans.

But Rolle Exmouth Limited (REL), which has fought for seven years to turn the old college into a community, jobs and training hub, says it does not have to happen like that.

REL supporters say that if enough people say what they want, and take part in an upcoming consultation, most – if not all – of the site could end up in the hands of the community.

Next month, the site’s owners, Plymouth University, will exhibit two proposals for the seven-acre site, ahead of applying for outline planning permission.

One is for up to 100 homes, as well as sheltered housing and landscaping. This scheme covers around 90 per cent of the site and only two of the existing 11 buildings would not be demolished.

The Eldin building would be refurbished for housing, and the Owen Building used for a new hub called ‘The Rolle Centre’.

Under both plans, REL’s vision would be limited to this building and a bit of surrounding land.

The second option is identical, except that the 0.6 acres earmarked for sheltered housing would also be used for a community hub

However, despite the increased land for community use in this second option, almost 80 per cent of the site would still be developed.

Both plans are a far cry from what was published in 2012 by the university’s property managers, Grimleys.

Then, in a brochure, 60 per cent of the area was earmarked for the Rolle Centre, with just 40 per cent given over to housing.

But despite the plans, REL bosses insist that if enough people take part in the consultation, they could clinch a better deal for the town.

REL’s deputy chairman, Roy Pryke, said: “Plymouth University’s proposals are not the only options, of course – if enough people express their views and are determined to maximise this fantastic opportunity, then REL can build on that and seek to buy all or parts of the site for Exmouth.

“But we really need people to have their say and be clear about what they want. We can then make progress, conduct further fundraising and start to talk with potential developers about a new partnership approach.”

REL chairman Deborah Hallett said: “This is only an outline planning application, but it is critical that the community participates in the consultation. Securing outline planning permission is a critical step to move the project forward, but it is not necessarily what the final outcome will look like.

“We will put the case to the community and then to potential developers for what we believe should be the right mix between housing and the business, education and community aspects of the site.”

http://www.midweekherald.co.uk/news/rolle_homes_shock_1_4240694