“Rural homeowners told to wait for three years for ‘minimum’ broadband speeds”

“Ofcom said up to 1.5 million rural households will have to wait for two to three years before getting a basic internet service required for a ‘typical’ family home.

Ofcom argues that internet speeds of at least 10 megabits per second (Mbits/s) is the “minimum… required by the typical household” with multiple devices to get a good service to stream programmes and access websites.

Broadband speed tends to be slower in the countryside because homes are generally situated further away from internet exchanges than in towns and cities.

However, in a report, Ofcom warned that there are “about 1.5 million, or 48 per cent of, premises are unable to receive speeds above 10Mbit/s” in the British countryside. …

… Why is 10 mega bits per second a measure for good broadband?

The internet speed 10Mbits/s is seen as the minimum speed needed to watch iPlayer and Netflix in high definition, and make reliable Skype video calls.
Ofcom says: “Evidence suggests that those consumers with faster connections are more likely to rate their broadband experience good. In general, 10Mbit/s appears to be the tipping point beyond which most consumers rate their broadband experience as ‘good’. This continues to support our view that a minimum of 10Mbit/s is required by the typical household.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/countryside/12120912/Rural-homeowners-told-to-wait-for-three-years-for-minimum-broadband-speeds.html

“Government fail to declare reappointed National Gallery trustee is Tory donor”

” …David Cameron granted City financier, John Singer, a second term on the board of the Trafalgar Square gallery last week.

In keeping with rules to ensure that public appointments are made on merit, a Number 10 statement said that the financier had declared “no political activity” over the last five years.

But documents at the Electoral Commission uncovered by the Guardian show that Singer, the former European chairman of Advent International, has given the Tories £146,202.38 over the past five years, £48,500 of which was handed over in the last year. Since 2005, he has given £302,703 to the party.
The failure to disclose donations has prompted concern among MPs and staff at the gallery that Singer’s reappointment is part of a gradual ‘politicisation by stealth’ of the gallery. …”

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jan/25/government-fail-declare-reappointed-national-gallery-trustee-tory-donor

Can a devolved Devon deal with inequality?

In a recent article, Plymouth is cited as being one of the ten most deprived cities in England and described as “low wage, high welfare”; Exeter – the only other local city on the accompanying map – is described as “low wage, low welfare”:

http://gu.com/p/4g2gk

When power is in the hands of our Local Enterprise Partnership will their funds be targeted at Plymouth? It seems unlikely, as currently the LEP is most excited about, and most involved in, the commissioning of the Hinkley Point nuclear power plant.

How will the LEP ensure that funds are shared out equitably? It’s only criterion in promoting “economic growth” which is most easily done in those places already growing. How can it square its need to invest in areas primed for growth where returns will be quicker and higher (so that it can be seen to tick its own boxes) and those areas blighted by lack of growth, which will be slower and lower and so drag its performance targets down even if they do invest?

Add to this the fact that, in future, much more revenue will need to be raised by local authorities directly in their own areas (e.g. reliance on local business rate income rather than government funds) and low income, low growth areas will be even more worse off than affluent areas.

Perhaps a councillor or member of the local LEP can enlighten us? Oh no, wait, all devolution matters are being handled in secret and our LEP members are remarkably shy of making public appearances with their LEP hats on, so we can’t ask them face to face.

Cash cows

Furore over beach hut and chalet site rental increases of 200% over the next two years:

Click to access the-knowledge-22-january-2016-issue-35.pdf

So, is it now time to revisit charging councillors and officers for parking at Knowle? This comes up most years but is always voted down.

Oh, and Owl hears they also get free parking in the district when out and about on ” council business”.

Let’s say, for the sake of easy maths, there are 60 councillors and 240 of the 400-plus officers parking there each week = 300 cars. If each car was charged £10 per week for 50 weeks of the year (let’s be generous and give them free weeks at Christmas and Easter) that would be an income of £150,000 per year. Then, when in council business, they could pay for their parking and claim it on expenses – where they would have to explain what business they were on.

Imagine the good things a council could do with £150,000 …

Are we likely to see this being discussed at an Asset Management Group – no – not least because we are not allowed to see the Asset Management Group at work.