USA pulls big Chinese partnership deal over “performance issues”

What price Hinkley C if the USA pulls out of a big deal with China:

“A [billions of dollars] high-speed railway project that was seen as a landmark deal in China’s export of advanced ­technology to the United States has fallen apart over performance and American regulatory issues.”

http://uk.businessinsider.com/us-china-partnership-ended-on-nevada-xpresswest-rail-project-2016-6?amp?r=US&IR=T

China wanted the rolling stock to be manufactured in China ( one wonders how things got so far before this crucial point was introduced) and a Chinese spokesperson said:

“It will be more effective if China just exports its equipment to other nations,” said Zhao Jian, a professor at Beijing Jiaotong University. “But China should avoid giving out massive loans and gaining operating rights for such projects. Many nations consider railway operation as a sovereignty issue, and it’s not easy for China to get involved.

“Such projects are costly, and not many nations have a sufficient population to generate profits. The demand is not enough to ensure long-term viability.”

Does this apply to Hinkley C, Owl wonders?