Should political lobbyists be allowed to become MPs?

“Owen Smith, who now faces Jeremy Corbyn in the Labour leadership battle, worked as a lobbyist in the pharmaceutical industry for five years before becoming the MP for Pontypridd in 2010.

After working for the US giant Pfizer, Smith moved to the controversial biotech firm Amgen in 2008. At the time, Amgen was battling an investigation into one of its most successful anaemia drugs, Aranesp.

Amgen was ultimately fined $762m for illegally promoting the drug to cancer patients in a way that increased the likelihood of their deaths. Amgen was hit with the fines after it emerged that the California company was “pursuing profits at the risk of patient safety” as it promoted a non-approved use of Aranesp.

Smith was in charge of corporate affairs, corporate and internal communications and public affairs at the British division of Amgen while the biotech company was being investigated.

The main whistleblower on Aranesp filed her case against Amgen in 2006, sparking a US investigation that took several years to conclude. The whistleblower also claimed that Amgen systematically overfilled vials of the drugs, when selling them in America, which enabled doctors to “pool” the excess amounts.

The doctors were then encouraged to bill Medicare and private insurers for the use of the excess drug, creating a system of “liquid kickbacks” according to one lawyer on the case.

Amgen also produces a drug called erythropoietin – better known as EPO – which it produced under its Epogen brand name. Epogen was connected to the international cycling scandal, which involved cyclists such as Lance Armstrong. …”

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/19/owen-smith-worked-as-pr-chief-for-biotech-firm-hit-by-762m-fine

David Cameron was “Director of Corporate Affairs” at Carlton TV (i.e. a lobbyist):

In July 1994, Cameron left his role as Special Adviser to work as the Director of Corporate Affairs at Carlton Communications. Carlton, which had won the ITV franchise for London weekdays in 1991, was a growing media company which also had film-distribution and video-producing arms. Cameron was suggested for the role to Carlton executive chairman Michael P. Green by his later mother-in-law Lady Astor. Cameron left Carlton to run for Parliament in 1997, returning to his job after his defeat.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Cameron#Carlton

and our own dear Hugo Swire had a similar job at the National Gallery:

“He was a financial consultant, then became of Head of Development for the National Gallery, then Director of the auction house Sotheby’s directly before his election from 1996.”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Swire#Career

Exmouth Jounal: when is news not news?

When it is the BIG, BIG story about EDDC dropping their development partner (Moirai Capital Investments) and going back to the drawing board for the seafront, which appeared on its website for only 24 hours, displaced by stories on the Tour of Britain, a school fete in Ottery and a by-election in Littleham.

Wonder how that decision came about?

Pebblebed heath: 350 endangered species found

“He said: “It is wonderful that the Pebblebed Heaths are enjoyed for recreation and provide a place to experience nature. However, the intensity of use of the Pebblebed Heaths can cause significant disturbance to wildlife, with adverse impacts of people and pets including predation of ground nesting birds, trampling and erosion of paths and tracks, along with nutrient enrichment through dog mess.”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/endangered_species_found_in_east_devon_pebblebed_heaths_1_4623169

Owl worries that it sounds as if Clinton Devon Estates would really like to ban or restrict people and dogs in the area.

And what about the quarrying that is being expanded around the heath and its impact?

And what happens when Mrs Leadsom decides that they are not being ” productive”?

Consultation on upgrade of A30 near Honiton

“The Council is proposing to replace the existing narrow, substandard single carriageway in the Monkton area with around five miles of new road between the Honiton Bypass and Devonshire Inn – the junction of the A30 with the A303.

The scheme will comprise a wide carriageway with three lanes. It will be a laid out with two lanes in one direction and one lane in the other to enable overtaking in one direction, alternating along the route.

Exhibitions will be held at the following venues:

Thursday 4 August, 8am-6pm – Honiton Show
Friday 5 August, 2pm-8pm – Upottery Village Hall
Saturday 6 August, 10am-6pm – Upottery Village Hall
Tuesday 16 August, 12pm-8pm – Monkton Court Hotel
Saturday 20 August, 10am-6pm – Mackarness Hall, Honiton
Saturday 10 September, 10am-6pm – Upottery Village Hall”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/a30-improvements-at-honiton-could-reduce-accidents-by-a-third/story-29528636-detail/story.html

Is this to make the road better for our councillors and officers to reach (or get away from) the forthcoming plush new offices in Honiton – centre of the EDDC universe?

Swire will talk about East Devon in Parliament as he sees fit

“Some of my detractors locally consistently point to my not mentioning East Devon in Parliament although I have repeatedly pointed out that as a Government Minister I was only able to speak to my brief. Of course it didn’t suit some to believe that but that is the case. But now no such restrictions apply and I am free to question and debate anything I choose. Liberated from office I can mention East Devon as much as I see fit.”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/east_devon_mp_hugo_swire_back_to_the_back_benches_1_4623156

How about not just mentioning East Devon when you see fit (translation: much more in an election year than at any other time) but REPRESENTING EAST DEVON and talking about the district when it is needed, not just when it suits YOU.

Oh, and we look forward to seeing you have surgeries on a weekly basis.

Pity Jeremy Hunt, pity the NHS, pity the patients

” …Without a change of tack, Hunt is likely to become the minister for the visible deterioration of the NHS – think Stephen Dorrell 1995-97. To survive and prosper, he will have to start being honest about how serious NHS understaffing is, stop depicting health professionals as lazy or unprofessional, somehow raise flagging staff morale, get real about delivering a “truly seven-day NHS” with no extra money or bodies, and start to offer hope that an NHS finally freed of austerity may once again be a place of pride, progress and improvement for staff, patients and maybe even politicians.”

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/jul/19/jeremy-hunt-survived-cabinet-reshuffle-what-now

The price of nature or the value of nature: Leadsom to decide

“Ministers must deliver on a manifesto pledge for a 25-year plan to boost nature and cut the costs of environmental damage, it has been urged.

Harm caused by floods, air pollution, water pollution and chemicals in the atmosphere are adding billions of pounds a year to bills, insurance premiums and costs for businesses, farms and households, environmentalists warn.

But after the Brexit vote, there is uncertainty whether environmental protections provided by the European Union will be maintained.

And the promised 25-year plan for the environment has been delayed, the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust (WWT) said.

Air pollution costs the UK an estimated £15-20bn a year, flood damage £1.4bn, water pollution can add up to 17% on consumer bills, £129m is spent cleaning farm run-off from water supplies and farmers incur an extra £180m in growing costs a year due to chemicals in the air.

But efforts to protect nature would deliver significant economic and social benefits, a report by WWT said.

For example, creating 100,000 hectares of new wetlands from restoring upland peat and coastal salt marshes to creating “pocket ponds” in cities could reduce flooding, purify water, save money and improve mental health.

The report urges the government to deliver on the 25-year plan, and to make itself accountable to parliament by producing an annual budget statement on the value of nature alongside the value of the economy.

Ministers should also ensure UK environmental protection is as strong or stronger after Brexit and appoint “catchment commissioners” to co-ordinate a joined-up approach in each area and reward action across the landscape, it said.

WWT is also calling for ministers to establish guidance and accreditation for organisations providing “green prescriptions” which give access to nature to deliver affordable benefits to physical and mental health.

Opposition parties have backed the call for the government to keep its promise for a 25-year plan for the environment.

They urged ministers to commit to consulting on a plan which sets out strong policies, with long term legally-binding targets to improve the environment, maintains protection after Brexit, and ensures international co-operation on the issue.

In a joint statement, Lib Dem leader Tim Farron, shadow environment secretary Rachael Maskell and Green party MP Caroline Lucas warned “our environment must not be a victim of short-term political unrest”.

WWT chief executive, Martin Spray, said: “We all end up paying for environmental damage through higher prices and taxes, as well as the social and health costs of Britain being a less healthy place to live.

“Our recommendation is remarkably simple. Make the government accountable to parliament for the value of the environment as well as the economy. Transparency will drive improvement.

He added: “This is a key early test for the new prime minister.

“Will she deliver a manifesto commitment to value our environment? And in a post-Brexit Britain she has another question to answer: Will she commit to environmental protection improving on – or at least being equal to – that provided by the EU?”

A Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) spokeswoman said: “Developing a 25-year plan for the environment is a Conservative manifesto commitment and a priority for this department.

“While the precise nature of the plan may change now the UK has decided to leave the EU, we will seize this opportunity to consider our long-term vision for the environment and work with a range of interests to determine and deliver it.”

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jul/19/uk-government-must-deliver-on-25-year-environmental-pledge?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Working families largest group of “new poor” not the unemployed or pensioners

“Improving the income of the working poor is the key to reducing inequality, according to the Institute of Fiscal Studies.

Its study Living Standards, Poverty and Inequality in the UK: 2016, funded by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, was published today at an event in central London. It highlights some significant changes to the nature of poverty in the UK.

Pensioners’ incomes have risen to the extent that they are now the least likely major demographic group to be in income poverty, after housing costs. Another crucial development is that more people are in work than ever before.

Also, the proportion of children living in a household where no-one works has fallen from nearly one in four in 1994-95 to less than one in six in 2014-15.

Subsequently, the report found the “new poor” tend to be located in houses where there is someone in work. Only one-third of children below the government’s absolute poverty line now live in a workless household. The remainder (two-thirds) of those classed as poor are poor despite the fact that at least one of their parents is in work.

A negative consequence of this change is that poor households are therefore more sensitive to labour market fluctuations than those of the past. It also means that initiatives designed to allay child poverty will be less effective if the focus remains on getting people into work.

For the poorest fifth of households today, income from employment makes up half of total income. Twenty years ago, this figure was under one-third, indicating a greater reliance on benefits and tax credits.

In the report, the IFS stated that if new prime minister Theresa May took the decision to continue the ‘life chances’ strategy started under David Cameron, it should be aimed at raising the economic prospects of working households. …”

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2016/07/poverty-now-resides-within-working-households-says-ifs

Lies, damned lies – and government funding figures

Extract from a report by the government’ select committee on health, chaired by former Totnes GP Sarah Woolaston:

” …Following the conclusion of the committee’s recent inquiry into the spending review, Totnes MP Dr Sarah Wollaston argues Government cuts to public health budget are likely increase costs in the long-term. …

… Last autumn, then chancellor George Osborne announced NHS England would receive an extra £8.4 billion above inflation by 2020/21 to help it cope with growing demand.

However, according to the committee’s findings,this only equates to a real term increase of £4.5 billion of 2015 is used as a base year.

Dr Wollaston acknowledges the NHS “has been treated favourably” compared to many other departments but concludes the increase “is less than was promised if assessed by the usual definitions”. …

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/mp-warns-of-false-economy-in-government-approach-to-health-spending/story-29526995-detail/story.html