Exmouth: have councillors been misled – asks councillor

PRESS RELEASE
Have Councillors been misled?

East Devon District Council’s Cabinet “rubber stamped” the go ahead for a “full planning permission” on the redevelopment at Queen’s Drive, Exmouth which they were told needs to be submitted by the end of the year.

This is part of what the Cabinet recommended on the 9th November:
“To note that under delegated powers and an exemption to standing orders, officers have engaged planning and design services to take forward a reserved matters application for the continuance of the current planning approval of Queen’s Drive.”

This means that contrary to normal procedures officers engaged the planning and design services of a company to design and submit a full planning application proposal for the remainder of the Queen’s Drive Development.

Within the submitted papers presented to the Cabinet it explains officers drew up a proposal to hire consultants in September 2016 and gave details of the costs which are estimated at £65,000.

The document states it is “necessary to submit the application by the end of 2016.” It also claims to be a “technical exercise” simply to “sustain a planning application”.

Local Independent District Councillors believe that the advice given to the Cabinet members was misleading. Rather than a “technical exercise” the proposal to submit a “reserved matters application” would provide full planning permission which in theory would allow contractors to start development as soon as it is approved. The ‘reserved matters’ application does not need to be submitted until 24th January, when the current outline application expires.

Megan Armstrong, District Councillor for Exmouth said “Independent colleagues and I cannot understand why the Council has now decided to appoint a designer to submit a full planning application at vast expense when all that is required is to submit a further outline planning application to replace the present one.

The cost of a new outline application would be far less than the ‘reserved matters’ proposal.”

Councillor Armstrong added “If this goes ahead, it contradicts the recommendation that “the Council will give Exmouth people another opportunity to have their say on what happens on that site. The Council will bring in external expertise to carry out a review. This will involve full consultation that is neither developer nor Council led.”

“I believe the District Council should put in a fresh outline planning application for phases two & three, which could be done before the current one expires. Then we can have the full consultation, rather than setting out the ‘reserved matters’ details first, which seems to be putting the cart before the horse. We understand that these Cabinet decisions will be discussed further at the next Full Council meeting on 21st December.”

— ENDS —

One thought on “Exmouth: have councillors been misled – asks councillor

  1. Am i correct in assuming that Cllr Skinner is in charge of Exmouth Town Centre and Seafront Masterplan, or is it the Queens Drive Exmouth Splash and the Waterside Sport Complex Development, that he seems to be concerned with.
    We did have the brief summary of the key proposals back in 2010 followed by a consultation in 2011 .
    At that time it was the Estuaryside area and the London Inn / Post Office area which were the first vision of regeneration which was openly approved by most residents in strengthening both the economy, and drawing more spending power into the town.
    I want to know why all the principles of guiding the future investment in Exmouth and the set of aims and objectives has all been sidelined, for a “Development of what we know little about” except knowing it is was the Children’s Amusements and Leisure Parks situated on a very seasonal part of Queens Drive, and although needs renovating, it was loved by many visitors.
    Since Cllr Skinner has assumed the position of Chairman of the Regeneration Projects i would like to know what he is doing about it.

    Like

Comments are closed.