And let’s hope this doesn’t happen in East Devon …

“If you’re having a bad day at work spare a thought for Tiverton’s town clerk – who has mistakenly opened a virus and wiped every council document since 2015.

John Vanderwolfe, who says it’s the worst thing that’s happened in his 12 years in the role, admits the blunder “is a lesson to us all.”

The virus infected Town Hall this week when an email arrived in Tiverton Town Council’s inbox claiming to be from a parcel delivery firm.

It explained that parcel needed to be collected, and that the URL link supplied would lead to a page containing details on how to retrieve it.

It was around five minutes later that it became apparent that a virus, disguised in the email, had infected every single one of the council’s computers.

On recollection, Mr Vanderwolfe sad it was fairly apparent the email was suspicious.

Mr Vanderwolfe explains: “Sometimes when you are in a rush and busy, you can slip up.

“This virus was horrible and now all of the documents are encrypted. Instead of [Microsoft] Word for example, it comes up with gobbledygook.

“It then asks for £3,000 in exchange for the file to be unlocked. But even then there is no guarantee they would do it.

“We have had an IT expert in to have a look but he is unsure on how to fix it. Our anti-virus wasn’t good enough for this one.

“It is a warning to other people and it I think our security for this type of thing needs re-thinking.

He added: “My advice is: If in doubt, don’t open it.”

Many documents, including finance and planning documents have been unaffected as they are either on separate systems or uploaded to the town council website.

According to Mr Vanderwolfe, the majority of those lost are letters – many of those sent in by residents.

The documents are expected to take some months to re-scan and upload onto the system.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/dodgy-email-launched-virus-that-has-wiped-every-tiverton-council-document-created-since-2015/story-30107267-detail/story.html

Dorset Local Government reorganisation goes ahead despite 3 councils dropping out

Interesting that the Secretary of State for Local Government can force the three recalcitrant councils to join the others …

Six councils are to press ahead with asking communities secretary Sajid Javid to reorganise local government in Dorset, despite the remaining three opposing the idea.

A plan to create two unitary councils in the area at present covered by Dorset County Council and unitaries Bournemouth and Poole borough councils has now been voted on by all involved.

Christchurch, East Dorset and Purbeck have opposed the idea, though it was supported by the two unitaries, the county council and districts North Dorset, West Dorset and Weymouth & Portland.

The six are now expected to ask Mr Javid to reorganise the area into two unitaries. One would cover Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole and the other East Dorset, North Dorset, Purbeck, West Dorset and Weymouth & Portland.
Matt Prosser, chair of the Dorset Chief Executives Group, said: “We now have a mandate from our councils [for reorganisation] and we have the backing of the public and other stakeholders. That is clear from the consultation results.

“Now, we have a duty to respond to that mandate and secure a sustainable and even brighter future for Dorset.”

The dissident trio face the problem that Mr Javid has powers to enforce the reorganisation even against their objections.

Christchurch leader Ray Nottage said: “Changes to the structure of local government in Dorset present an historic opportunity to transform our services at a time when budgets are being cut and our priority must be protecting frontline services.

“The secretary of state submission made by those councils that have agreed the recommendation might see the final decision regarding local government reorganisation taken out of our hands.”

Spencer Flower, leader of East Dorset, said: “If other councils in Dorset choose to make a submission to the secretary of state, the final decision regarding local government reorganisation will not be ours to make.”
Purbeck rejected reorganisation only on the chair’s casting vote, with councillors tied 11-11 on the proposal.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=29888%3Agroup-of-dorset-councils-press-ahead-with-unitary-plan-despite-rejection-by-other-county-authorities&catid=59&Itemid=27

This would NEVER happen in East Devon!

“Tory councillor accused of being a ‘rogue estate agent’ for drugs syndicate

A Tory councillor was a “rogue estate agent” for a sophisticated drugs syndicate which grew more than a million pounds worth of Cannabis, a court heard.

Donal Hassett, 55, used false names, references and cover stories to rent houses which were turned into drug factories, it was said.

Police found 1,285 plants with a street value of almost £1.1m growing at seven properties, four of which were linked to the politician.

Hassett, who represents Newbridge for Bath and North East Somerset Council, denies two charges of conspiring with others to produce cannabis.

He admits fraudulently renting the houses in Somerset, Wiltshire and Bristol, but claims he had no idea they were being used to grow drugs, jurors were told.

The first charge relates to a drug-growing operation involving a 38-year-old Vietnamese man, while the second involves four other Vietnamese people.

Bristol Crown Court heard that £56,000 was put into his bank account while the second conspiracy was going on, between January 2015 and March 2016.

A further £81,000 was placed in the account of Tan Tran, 27, who is standing trial alongside Hassett.

Prosecuting, Simon Burns said Hasset, of Bath, Somerset, was the “property fixer, the rogue estate agent”, while Tran was the “courier, assistant”.

He said: “They were part of an organised sophisticated drugs syndicate operating to produce very large quantities of cannabis.

“It was as plain as a pikestaff that they had knowledge of what they were involved with.”

http://www.somersetlive.co.uk/b-nes-councillor-donal-hassett-accused-of-being-a-rogue-estate-agent-for-drugs-syndicate/story-30104558-detail/story.html

Mr Hassett had served on the Licensing Committee at Bath Council and was expelled from his local Conservative Party pending the outcome of these proceedings.

Relocation and local government reorganisation – a chance to save money!

What is currently more important in local government? Saving money, saving money by merger or being profligate? These seem to be the stark choices facing our district, with its reliance on the Local Enterprise Partnership for strategy, direction and funding.

Closer examination of the agenda for the next Cabinet meeting reveals that there are two references to local government reorganisation: at the bottom of page 111 and on page 115:

“Identify opportunities for rationalising/improving existing public sector governance arrangements and make recommendations to the constituent authorities/partners”

This appears to be a clear reference, as it not only refers to reform, but also says that the recommendations will go to ‘constituent authorities’. In other words we are not talking just about the LEP. The new Joint Committee clearly has mergers in mind. Add “Greater Exeter” into the mix and we come out with even more likelihood of massive changes. THEN add a mooted “Golden Triangle LEP” and we have a truly chaotic situation.

Owl wonders if these are circumstances in which to pursue a new HQ for EDDC at Honiton. Any proposal involving EDDC and avoiding building at Honiton can immediately claim to have made a minimum saving of £10 million plus interest payments, plus many associated costs – savings now being the mantra nowadays.

The relocation from Knowle could, in the above circumstances prove to be most expensive suicide note in the history of our district. And those EDDC members who waved through the move to Honiton, without the slightest idea of the cost, could in these circumstances be likened to turkeys voting for Christmas.

We have seen with the reorganisation in Dorset, that the reform and merger of local government authorities is very much in the air, and Dorset has been suggesting that the creation of two unitaries will lead to annual savings of many millions of pounds.

So it’s not surprising that things have gone very quiet with EDDC relocation. Firstly, there is local government reorganisation all around us and within our nearby city and the county. Secondly, the Pegasus deal for Knowle has seemingly gone very much on the back burner.

We have recently seen the formal separation – ‘decoupling’ – of the Exmouth Town Hall work from the Honiton proposal which seems to have had more to do with mothballing Honiton than it had to do with allowing Exmouth to proceed more quickly.

Work to refurbish Knowle is almost certainly millions of pounds cheaper than relocating. Plus, a new building in Honiton would immediately depreciate enormously on day one of occupation – 50% plus has been suggested.

Of course, PegasusLife could always put in a planning application for the Honiton site!

Our Local Enterprise Partnership and the NHS (or not the NHS)

Comment turned into post:

“In the light of the concern over the future of the NHS it may be worth reminding ourselves just what Heart of the South West LEP proposed, on our behalf, in their 2015 Devolution Statement of Intent:

We [HOTSW] will:

• Increase productivity by reducing ill-health and reliance on the state

• Reduce overall need for formal health and social care services

• Reduce the cost of health and social care

• Help more people with long-term illnesses or mental ill-health start or return to work

What we need:

• Freedom to pool budgets and direct resources to local need

• Freedom to develop a commissioning framework that supports local decision-making

• Freedom to establish effective, integrated governance and delivery structures

• Freedom to develop local metrics and incentives

(The associated productivity prospectus says something which sounds even more sinister: “A healthier population means lower public sector costs and increased economic activity. To fill 163,000 more jobs [by 2030] we must engage the non-working population in the labour market which will require a significant health and care contribution.”)

Here is what the Public Accounts Committee concluded about LEPs and devolution in its report of 27 June 2016. (Kevin Foster MP, Conservative Torbay, is a Committee member)

“9. It is alarming that LEPs are not meeting basic standards of governance and transparency, such as disclosing conflicts of interest to the public.

LEPs are led by the private sector, and stakeholders have raised concerns that they are dominated by vested interests that do not properly represent their business communities. There is a disconnect between decisions being made by local business leaders and accountability working via local authorities.

It is therefore crucial that LEPs demonstrate a high standard of governance and transparency over decision making, at least equal to the minimum standards set out by government in the assurance framework.

It is of great concern that many LEPs appear not be meeting these minimum standards. The scale of LEP activity and the sums involved necessitate that LEPs and central government be pro-active in assuring the public that decisions are made with complete probity.

The fact that 42% of LEPs do not publish a register of interests is clearly a risk to ensuring that decisions are made free from any actual or perceived conflicts of interest. The varying presentation and detail of financial information across LEPs also makes it difficult to draw meaningful conclusions or make comparisons across LEPs on how they spend public money.”

https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmpubacc/296/29605.htm

The National Audit Office in a 2016 report also made the obvious, but crucial, point that LEPs do not yet have an established track record of delivery.

Our future is in their hands!”