Confusion in local polls – postal ballots re-issued in Woodbury & Lympstone

Postal ballots have had to be-issued in Lympstone & Woodbury as a result of confusion about whether or not one of the candidates, Amanda Ford, could display a red “Labour” logo on the ballot paper.

The “description” section of her nomination paper blank had been left blank and she seemed to be standing as an independent, adding the logo means that she isn’t. (Owl understands that the returning officer is acting on advice from the Electoral Commission on what must be an unprecedented case).

Amanda is a bit of a chameleon figure who popped onto Owl’s radar in 2018 when she quit as the Teign Valley ward member on Teignbridge District Council, slashing the Conservative majority to one.

Her resignation followed suspension by the Conservative Party days before her resignation following claims that she had broken the Code of Conduct for members.

In 2017 she stood as the Conservative candidate in the Barnsley Central ward in the General Election. 

This is how DevonLive reported her resignation at the time:

“Prior to her departure, she had resigned from the vice-chairman role of the overview and scrutiny committee, had complained that she was being bullied by officers, and that the atmosphere at council HQ was ‘poisonous’.

But Cllr Jeremy Christophers, leader of the council, denied her claims and said that he was saddened by the allegations and misrepresentations that she made and that the council’s senior leadership team did not recognise her version of events and relations between officers and members.

He added: “It was sad end for someone who showed some promise in the early days but who couldn’t get her head around the idea of collective decision making.

“Just saying what you like to who you like, when you like, doesn’t apply when you are a councillors, and some officers were concerned by a lack of respect that she had for them.

“We had tried to help her through the complaints process with her grievances but she did not take and listen to the relevant legal advice from the council. In fact, she was actually suspended from the Conservative Group on October 31 as she had broken the members’ code of conduct which says that you must treat officers with respect.”

Cllr Ford did not reply to request from the LDRS to comment on the reasons for her departure from Teignbridge District Council.”

Labour to use tactic that finished off Truss to force Tories into sewage vote

Another opportunity for “ I would never vote to pollute our water” Simon Jupp to repeat his vote against toughening up the rules. – Owl

Labour is planning to use the same Commons procedure that helped remove Liz Truss from Downing Street to force Conservative MPs into a politically embarrassing vote about whether to toughen up rules on sewage discharges.

Peter Walker www.theguardian.com 

The party plans to use its regular opposition day motion on Tuesday to push a binding motion, which would oblige the government to set aside Commons time next week for a debate and vote on a Labour bill to impose tougher penalties for sewage spills.

While the motion will fail if the government, as expected, whips its MPs to vote it down, this outcome would allow Labour to say Tory MPs had opposed plans to clean up rivers, beaches and chalk streams, a potentially potent attack before local elections, also next week.

When Labour last used the tactic of an opposition day motion to seize control of the Commons order paper, in an attempt to ban new fracking, a bungled whipping operation by Truss’s government resulted in bedlam, prompting her to resign the next day.

Tuesday’s motion would overturn the Commons’ standing order 14 (1) to take control of the order paper, a tactic popularised during the period of chaotic Brexit wrangling under Theresa May. Standing order 14 (1) sets out that government business takes precedence in the chamber, but can be overturned by a majority vote.

The Labour motion would set aside Commons time on 2 May to debate and vote on the water quality (sewage discharge) bill, introduced last month by Jim McMahon, the shadow environment secretary.

If passed, the bill would increase penalties for water companies and others who fail to adequately monitor sewage discharges, impose fines and binding targets for such events, and oblige the government to publish a strategy on the issue.

Downing Street and Conservative whips have not commented on whether they will order Tory MPs to vote against the motion. While the government often ignores opposition day votes, allowing an unopposed win, because Tuesday’s motion is binding, they are likely to vote it down.

This could prove uncomfortable for Conservative MPs, given public anger in many areas about sewage discharges into rivers, streams and coastlines, generally exacerbated by a long-term lack of investment by privately owned water companies.

Launching a cleaner water plan earlier this month, the environment secretary, Thérèse Coffey, warned that upgrading the sewage network to stop spills could add hundreds of pounds to water bills.

Both Labour and the Liberal Democrats have used previous votes over sewage – particularly one in October 2021, when Conservative MPs voted down an amendment to the environment bill on reducing discharges – to target individual Tories over the issue.

Sewage has become a prominent issue in advance of the local elections that take place across England next week, with the Lib Dems in particular using it in their campaign.

After data showed raw discharges were sent into English rivers 825 times a day last year, Keir Starmer has accused the government of “turning Britain’s waterways into an open sewer”.

McMahon said: “Tory MPs have an opportunity to support Labour’s water quality bill, which will put an end to sewage dumping once and for all. Their constituents will be watching to see if they will put the best interests of our country before their party.”

Applications open for green spaces funding worth £500,000 for community projects in East Devon, Exmouth and Honiton

Funding of half a million pounds is available for ‘green’ community spaces in East Devon, Exmouth and Honiton.

East Devon Reporter eastdevonnews.co.uk

National Grid Electricity Distribution has announced a new Green Spaces Fund – with £500,000 to support areas of East Devon.

The aim of the fund is to boost communities, encourage wildlife, improve air quality, reduce noise and a host of other benefits.

Applications are invited from community organisations and projects that encourage volunteering. The closing date is Friday, May 12.

The fund will award grants of up to £2,000 for unregistered organisations. Registered charities and eligible non-profit companies can apply for up to £10,000.

Jill Russell, environment manager at National Grid, said: “We’re committed to empowering communities and promoting sustainability across our region.

“The launch of the Green Spaces Community Fund is a testament to this commitment and we’re excited to support grassroots organisations to create green spaces that benefit everyone.

“We believe that access to green spaces is essential for the wellbeing of both individuals and communities, and we look forward to seeing the positive impact of this initiative on our communities.”

Funding could be made available in East Devon, Exmouth and Honiton for projects such as:

  • Planting spaces and new allotment creation in existing green spaces
  • Bee banks, bird/bat boxes, wildflowers, ponds, trees, hedges, and other projects to improve biodiversity
  • Development of unused land into green spaces
  • Gardening workshops and allotment activities to bring vulnerable members of the community into green spaces, including sensory or mindfulness garden creation
  • Access pathways, ramps and seating in in parkland or nature reserves
  • Redevelopment of existing green spaces to encourage greater community use
  • Forest school education sessions for young people or craft workshops in nature
  • Innovative approaches to create or develop green spaces for public enjoyment

The Green Spaces project is the latest phase of the Community Matters Fund run by National Grid Electricity Distribution.

The fund – paid for entirely by shareholders – has awarded £4.3 million to eligible organisations since 2021.

A National Grid spokesman said: “Applications are now open for a new Green Spaces Fund which will support communities across East Devon to enhance their local environment and encourage more people to make the most of their green spaces.

“The aim of the fund is to support the development of green spaces to bring communities together, encourage more wildlife and biodiversity, improve air quality and reduce noise, as well as delivering health benefits, and creating employment and volunteering opportunities.

“Applications are welcome from community organisations of all kinds, particularly those supporting vulnerable groups to overcome barriers to accessing green spaces.

“Projects that create volunteering opportunities for members of the local community are also encouraged to apply.”

John Hart goes “off piste”

Devon’s top Tory doesn’t agree with voter ID

His council isn’t holding upcoming elections

A senior Conservative councillor has questioned whether new voter ID rules for elections are needed, as Devon prepares to go to the polls next week.

Ollie Heptinstall, local democracy reporter www.radioexe.co.uk

John Hart, the leader of Devon County Council, doesn’t back the Tory government’s initiative.

Election day on Thursday 4 May will be the first time that voters need to show an accepted form of photographic ID, such as a passport or driving licence, before being allowed to cast their ballots.

The move is controversial, with those against the change saying it creates a problem that doesn’t exist and will make it harder for some people to vote. There has also been criticism that older people are more likely to have forms of ID to choose from. Student ID cards, for example, are not permitted.

However, the government says the requirement to show photographic indentification will “protect the integrity of the ballot box” and eliminates the “potential for voter fraud.”

Those without the acceptable ID can apply for a free voter authority certificate from their local council, but only have until tomorrow, Tuesday, to do so.

Discussing the new requirement, Councillor John Hart, Conservative leader of Devon County Council has said: “I’m not sure it’s needed, personally.”

Speaking to BBC Politics South West, he added: “I do know, though, that our district councils have worked very hard to make sure that they make a success of it in May.

“On the basis of that, I do congratulate them on what they’ve done to try and make sure that everything on election day runs smoothly.”

Some Devon councils, including East Devon, North Devon and Plymouth, had urged the government to delay introducing the new rules, while Cllr Hart said it had supported the Local Government Association in calling for a delay.

Former Tiverton and Honiton Tory MP Neil Parish defended the change last month, telling Devoncast from Radio Exe: “I think it’s really necessary because, in the end, we need to make sure everyone who votes are who they say they are.”

The good people of Sidmouth deserve better

It would appear that the Tories are struggling to find Sidmouth folk who aren’t related to stand in the 3 Sidmouth wards in this election, or to find candidates who actually live in the Ward they’re standing in.

Sidmouth Town has two Tory candidates. Firstly, John Zarczynski who lives in Honiton and was on Honiton Town Council. In December 2019 an independent investigation by East Devon District Council’s monitoring officer found that he, Councillor John Zarczynski, and two other Honiton Town Councillors had all breached the code of conduct as they hadn’t treated others with courtesy and respect. The monitoring officer found that all three had brought Honiton Town Council into disrepute.

John Zarczynski was sanctioned to apologise in two separate cases in 2019. I wonder why he’s not standing for a Honiton seat in this election? Perhaps the thought is that the good people of Sidmouth won’t have been following his activities over the hill in Honiton over recent years.

https://honiton.nub.news/news/local-news/honiton-mayor-says-he-didnt-resign-because-he-was-ordered-to-say-sorry

https://www.midweekherald.co.uk/news/20354228.honiton-mayor-two-councillors-brought-town-council-disrepute/

John Zarczynski’s Tory running mate in Sidmouth is serial candidate Sophie Richards. By serial candidate I mean this is her third location in 5 years and her fourth attempt at getting elected to something. God does love a tryer.

In 2018 Sophie was unsuccessful in getting elected as a Councillor for North End on Hammersmith & Fulham Council in London. She then flitted to Coventry for the 2019 general election where Sophie again was unsuccessful, but this time as a parliamentary candidate in the NE Coventry Constituency. Bless her, Sophie still tells everyone on her Twitter biog of that campaign, but strangely not of her current attempt in Sidmouth.

Then in 2022 Sophie has another, albeit unsuccessful attempt, at getting elected as a Councillor on Hammersmith & Fulham Council, this time for the West Kensington Ward.

https://whocanivotefor.co.uk/elections/local.hammersmith-and-fulham.north-end.2018-05-03/north-end/

https://members.parliament.uk/constituency/3427/election/397

https://www.lbhf.gov.uk/councillors-and-democracy/elections/previous-election-results/2022-council-election-results/2022-west-kensington-ward-result

And now Sophie has rocked up to stand in Sidmouth, living it would seem at “Mama Richards” home in Sidmouth. I guess she likes the commute to our special part of the world and it’s a short hop to seek out “friends” in Exmouth.

Welcome, albeit presumably temporarily Sophie, to your latest election test in your new home with Mama. There’s just no stopping you in your hunger to get elected. Somewhere!

Mama Richards, as Sophie referred to her on Twitter recently, lives in Sidmouth where she works as a solicitor. Mama, or Christina as the ballot paper will refer to her as, is standing in Sidmouth Rural and if elected alongside Sophie, will have the pleasure of quality mother and daughter time in the Council chamber. And it’s always nice to see parents opening their doors to their grown-up children to “live” with them. It always is necessary to live in the area where you are standing in a local election.

The Tories are standing Councillor Mike Goodman, who lives a short distance from Sidmouth sea front to stand in his neighbouring Ward of Sidford. Presumably John and Sophie were seen as better candidates for his home Ward of Sidmouth Town.

Councillor Goodman has been a Councillor on Windlesham parish Council since 2019 and this year has managed to get back to Surrey to attend 6 out of its 9 Council meetings, as recently as 28 March. Will he be attending his next one on 25 April?

Whilst Mike has been a Councillor in Windlesham it hasn’t stopped him climbing the local Conservative Party greasy political ladder to become local deputy chairman political last summer. He’s also been very active in continuously attacking the decisions of the same district council he now wants to be elected to.

Mike still has a property back in Windlesham that he registers himself as the landlord of and he still, according to his Councillor profile, sits on the Surrey County Association of Parish & Town Councils.

Mike has a bee in his bonnet about the increase in local car park charges, but he easily forgets how Surrey Live reported in 2019 that “Surrey councillor ‘fully committed’ to maintaining controversial countryside car parking charges”. As a Surrey County Councillor Mike was responsible for introducing car parking charges that upset local residents. Despite local opposition, then Surrey County Councillor Mike was reported by Surrey Live as saying “he was “fully committed” to keeping the

charges”.

Oh, how easily Mike forgets his controversial past and is able to lambast our district council over car parking charges. Mike loves to have his cake and eat it.

https://www.windleshampc.gov.uk/Windlesham_Village_Committee_23161.aspx

https://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/surrey-news/surrey-councillor-fully-committed-maintaining-15752762

And finally, Sidford has that old Monster Raving Loony supporter, and activist, Stuart “Huggy” Hughes partnering Mike on behalf of the Tories in these elections.

I’m a wise old owl and so I encourage Sidmouth voters to look behind their Tory candidates’ names and judge them on their track records, and their roles in Sidmouth and the Sid Valley.

Breaking: New anti-pollution campaign group launches Tiverton today, Exmouth tomorrow, Exeter Wednesday

River Exe under threat from pollution and ‘human activity’ 

Friends of the River Exe (FORE), will be launching this week with open meetings in Tiverton, Exeter, and Exmouth.

The launch meetings will be held from 6 pm – 8 pm on Monday, April 24th, in Tiverton at St George’s Church Extension, on Tuesday, April 25th, in Exmouth at the Railway Club, and on Wednesday, April 26th, in Exeter at the City Gate Hotel.

Lewis Clarke www.devonlive.com

The River Exe is under threat from pollution and human activity, with heavily polluted water, stripped banks, and depleted wildlife, a new campaign group has warned. The new organisation, Friends of the River Exe (FORE), will be launching this week with open meetings in Tiverton, Exeter, and Exmouth. FORE aims to bring together diverse grassroots organizations and people who live, work, and play along the Exe and its tributaries to be a voice for the river.

“These first meetings will be to gather communities to plan how best to protect, restore and celebrate our river,” said Mary Culhane, one of the organisers. “We’re excited about this chance to pull together all the amazing groups, people, and organizations that exist along the River Exe and believe that together we can really make a difference in tackling this horrendous crisis.”

The launch meetings will be held from 6 pm – 8 pm on Monday, April 24th, in Tiverton at St George’s Church Extension, on Tuesday, April 25th, in Exmouth at the Railway Club, and on Wednesday, April 26th, in Exeter at the City Gate Hotel. Speakers will include Franny Armstrong, a filmmaker who made Age of Stupid and Rivercide, and campaigners from Friends of the River Wye, a pathbreaking campaign contesting pollution in the Wye from sewage and intensive poultry farms.

The group is angry that sewage was discharged into Devon rivers over 2,068 times in 2021, totalling over 20,853 hours of sewage discharge in just one year. But Friends of the River Exe believe the river can be restored to full ecological health, benefiting birds, fish, invertebrates, and humans who depend on the Exe for life and happiness.

The group is inspired by organisations forming to fight for their rivers in many other catchments in England. From gathering together as a force for change to signing up as citizen scientists to test the water, to celebrating the river with a Festival of the Exe in September 2023, the organizers hope to hear what citizens feel moved to do and would like to be a part of.

Franny Armstrong, who grew up near the River Exe in Devon, said: “Do we sit back and watch such a natural wonder being destroyed? Or do we step up, get together, and fight to protect, restore and celebrate our river, for ourselves and for future generations? Come and join us.”

Free places can be reserved at Tiverton, Exmouth, and Exeter events through Eventbrite. Friends of the River Exe hopes that this initiative will bring the community together to save the river and make a significant difference in its restoration.

Planning applications validated by EDDC for week beginning 10 April

Holiday hotspots are the butt of the ‘affordable’ housing joke

‘Affordable housing” is a joke. The term is so subjective as to render the 80 per cent of market value definition useless. Housing is increasingly unaffordable to many, whether it comes at a 20 per cent “discount” or not. It is a problem particularly exacerbated in holiday let and second-home hotspots.

Carol Lewis www.thetimes.co.uk

In places popular with second-home owners house prices are likely to be more indicative of the income levels of the incomers than the resident population. This is why a more logical way of defining “affordable” would be to peg it to local earnings rather than local house prices.

Take Southwold on the Suffolk coast, where the average new-build home is £396,151; with a 20 per cent discount that’s £316,921. The median local salary is £22,856, so for housing to reflect local wages (4.5 times salary) a new home would have to be priced at £102,852 — a difference of 208 per cent, or £214,069, according to data provided by the property portal OnTheMarket.com.

Southwold’s Liberal Democrat councillor, David Beavan, says one so-called affordable house in the town is now being sold on the open market because no local could afford it — “unless they earned more than £80,000 a year”. He claims the three-bedroom shared-ownership home in the Old Hospital was earmarked for residents but which would cost £1,500 a month, has sat empty for nearly two years.

Southwold is far from the worst affected. For instance, in the Cotswolds the average affordable home costs £582,088 — 486 per cent more than the average resident could borrow — while the mortgage available for an average local income is just £99,356.

The issue was discussed in the Lords last week; peers argued for an amendment to the levelling-up bill to peg affordable housing to local earnings.

It was recently announced that second-home owners will be forced to seek planning permission before renting out their properties as holiday lets. It is a well-meaning intervention supported by many in holiday hotspots, but there are those who say it could push house prices up even further.

Chris Norris, policy director of the National Residential Landlords Association, has told me that the proposed changes could backfire, with homes that have an established use as short lets — or, in future, with planning permission — trading at a premium. In effect this will force prices up in some holiday locations and accentuate the two-tier property market between second homes/holiday lets and local homes.

So what’s the punchline? The definition of affordable housing needs to be re-thought and linked to local salaries rather than local house prices. The setting up of community land trusts (communitylandtrusts.org.uk) needs to be encouraged and supported. These community-owned organisations own the land on which they build genuinely affordable homes based on what residents earn. Add to this a concerted effort to build more housing, particularly of the social kind.

Admittedly it isn’t exactly hilarious, but being able to afford a home shouldn’t be.

More on Richard Parr, Tory candidate who ran illegal landfill site

Not only is he campaigning to “stand up for our environment” but he is also pledging “to deliver the right homes in the right places”.

He should know, because he is also a major developer and will become a beneficiary of the South West Exeter urban extension plan. 

He and his partner Helen Lee applied for outline planning permission in March 2015  [Teignbridge 15/00921/MAJ] for major development of Matford Home Farm. This was granted in Nov 2020.

They submitted a more detailed design and access statement (glossy brochure) application a year later in Nov 2021 [Teignbridge 21/02604/MAJ] which is still under consideration.

The proposals for this site provide up to 250 homes, relocation of existing farm shop  use [Parr’s Farm Shop] with additional employment units of up to 560m2, 3 travellers pitches and recreational opportunities for future residents and neighbours.

According to the Design and Access Statement ,the overall area has been promoted through the planning system and forms part of the South West Exeter Development Framework adopted by Teingbridge District Council and the current Local plan.

Caveat: this is still an outline plan and as we all know, once outline permission has been granted, as it has been in this case, developers have a habit of making successive changes. The final result is all too often very different especially with regard to total numbers (upwards) and provision of “affordable” housing (downwards).

Major development in Matford which in effect creates a new ‘town’ on outskirts of Exeter has been described as “changing the countryside forever”, see www.devonlive.com

The coalition led EDDC of the past three years inherited a local plan devised and driven through by successive Conservative administrations based on a high growth scenario. The 18 year housing target in the 2013-2031 EDDC local plan is a minimum of 17,100. This is an increase of 63% over what is needed purely to satisfy demographic trends. 

In this short period the coalition has withdrawn from the secretive Greater Exeter Strategic Plan (GESP).

GESP was the strategic plan to spread Exeter’s housing needs more widely with its neighbours: Teignbridge; East Devon and Mid Devon. A draft allocation plan was published in 2019 (since withdrawn from the public domain). However we know that East Devon was set to take a disproportionate share of the total which amounted to a 150% uplift to the already eye watering local plan, and would continue to 2040.

Looks like Matford Farm is part of Teignbridge’s early contribution.

Those voting to keep East Devon in GESP in August 2020, were all the Conservatives present and all the self-styled “Independent Group”. These were the remainder of Ben Ingham’s group of “Independents” who did not join the Coalition or form Cranbrook Voice. The other unaligned “Independent” from the Ingham Group, Cllr Peter Faithfull, also voted to stay in the GESP. You can see how your councillor voted here.

The Coalition has also  paused reviewing the local plan now that the government does not intend to impose central targets, pending clarification.

A couple of weeks ago Owl wrote an article pointing out that despite losing 50% of their seats on the council in the space of eight years, in choosing Phil Skinner as leader, they were signalling “no change” to the discredited “Build, build, build” policies of the “Old Guard”.

If a return to the “Old Guard” is what you want, Richard Parr looks to be  your man.

Frustration at Labour and Lib Dem HQs as local parties ‘go rogue’ to create progressive alliance

National parties are a bit behind reality – think what has been happening in East Devon for the past three years. – Owl

In terms of the issues dominating the campaign trail, there is nothing unusual about the battle taking place to win seats on Berkshire’s Bracknell Forest council in May’s local elections. Potholes, council tax and sewage are among the hot topics on the doorstep.

Michael Savage www.theguardian.com 

Yet a closer inspection of the candidate list in the Tory stronghold reveals an odd quirk that some political pundits believe is unprecedented – and has also led to furious accusations from party leaderships that the local parties involved have “gone rogue” in their quest for electoral success.

You won’t hear any local party figures broadcasting it – in fact, none are prepared to talk about it publicly – but Bracknell Forest has emerged as the unlikely scene of a de facto progressive alliance between Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the Greens, attempting to make gains on a council where the Conservatives hold 37 of 42 seats.

In 12 of the council’s15 wards, only one of the three progressive parties are standing candidates. None of the 15 wards features Labour candidates taking on the Lib Dems. “It’s not unusual to have alliances between two or three parties at local level,” said local election expert and Tory peer Robert Hayward. “To have it as total as it is in Bracknell Forest is very rare, if not unique.”

To believe that this arrangement is the result of some bizarre coincidence stretches credulity, yet when asked how it came to pass, local party figures clam up. “You might think that,” said one party figure. “I couldn’t possibly comment.” Several people said a combination of the struggle to raise enough candidates and cash, together with the local knowledge of where they have the best chance of winning, had led to the unusual election choice.

While the local party bosses admit to “getting on well” with each other, they insist there has been no secret meeting to carve up the council contest between them – something they all know would lead to fierce condemnation from party headquarters.

“It’s not like we came together in a dark room saying, ‘you have this one and I’ll have that one’,” said one local party figure, on condition of anonymity. “It’s really a story about how to make the best of it in a borough which is heavily skewed [towards the Tories]. Focus your attention on where you’re going to win. And that’s what’s happened.”

It is frustration at the Tory domination, as well as a desperation to improve the diversity of the council, that has fuelled the unusual set up. “We’re just all fed up with it,” said another. “We’ve had really good people with something to offer – a real commitment, intelligence, capacity, insights and the knowledge to make a big difference. Instead, Donald Duck with a blue rosette gets voted in.”

While the frustration is understandable, the development will anger officials in Labour and Lib Dem headquarters, who oppose any local arrangement with other parties over where candidates run. The Labour party has already spent a lot of time clearly stating it would not do any deals with other parties – be it the SNP or the Lib Dems – in order to win power. Meanwhile, the Lib Dems need to win over traditionally Tory voters in many seats, and any suggestion it is standing aside for Labour is seen as damaging to those efforts.

“This was a decision taken by a single local party, which doesn’t reflect our position nationally with the highest level of candidates since 2007,” said Lib Dem deputy leader Daisy Cooper. “As our stunning byelection wins have shown in recent years, voters know who to vote for to get the Conservatives out, and in many areas across the country that is the Liberal Democrats.”

For anyone hoping that Bracknell Forest could lead the way in showing that progressive alliances could work across the country at a general election, pollsters and political scientists are not encouraging. Apart from national parties hating them, Hayward said history suggests they simply don’t work. “In terms of a progressive alliance as such, I don’t think it’s a precursor,” he said. “Both because of the general approaches of national parties and also because, when it comes to national issues, there are marked differences between the political parties involved.

“On a psephological basis, there’s very clear evidence that ‘progressive alliances’ don’t work. If you look at the way people transfer their votes on occasions like police and crime commissioners elections where they have the opportunity to transfer a vote, it has not gone wholeheartedly well for parties that people want to describe themselves as part of a ‘progressive alliance’. So there is no reason for believing that it will work now when it hasn’t worked previously.”

A Labour party spokesperson said the party “hasn’t done any deals and is not in the business of doing so … Voters aren’t fools, they don’t need parties to do deals – they need politicians who will put them first and improve their lives.”

Jailed Herefordshire farmer John Price caused ‘wanton destruction’

A HEREFORDSHIRE farmer caused “wanton destruction” by bulldozing the bank of the river Lugg, the Environment Agency has said.

Charlotte Moreau www.herefordtimes.com 

John Price was sentenced yesterday (April 20) to 12 months in prison by a district judge at Kidderminster Magistrates’ Court.

He was also ordered to pay prosecution costs of £600,000 and disqualified from being a director of a limited company for three years.

A Restoration Order under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 was also imposed requiring Price to carry out a number of actions to restore the river.

The sentence is the result of legal action launched last year by Natural England and the Environment Agency after an investigation into environmental harm caused by work carried out by Price in 2020 and 2021.

The 68-year-old used heavy machinery including bulldozers and excavators to dredge and reprofile a 1.5km stretch of the Lugg at Kingsland, Herefordshire, destroying the riverbed and banks.

John Price used heavy machinery to reprofile the bank (Image: Environment Agency)

The works were in breach of several regulations, and in a Site of Special Scientific Interest, which persisted despite Price being issued with a stop notice.

Speaking after the verdict, Emma Johnson, area manager for Natural England said: “The destruction of this section of the river Lugg was devastating for the abundance and range of species which thrived in this river.

“The Lugg is one of the most iconic rivers in the UK and to see this wanton destruction take place was devastating. This is why we have used our powers as regulators to see that justice was done and to act as a stark warning to others that we will take the strongest action against those who do not respect the laws that protect the environment and wildlife we all cherish.

The site after John Price carried out the works to the bank of the river Lugg (Image: Environment Agency)

“We want to ensure that Mr Price now takes the necessary actions which we hope, in time will restore this much-loved stretch of river to its former condition.”

Martin Quine, Environment Agency place manager for Herefordshire said that the EA is working hard to restore the health of rivers, a complex task that can only be achieved in partnership with landowners.

“We provide advice and guidance but will impose sanctions or prosecute where appropriate to protect the environment and ensure those who breach regulations are held to account,” he said.

“The vast majority of landowners and users fully cooperate with this process.

The site on the Lugg before John Price used heavy machinery to reprofile the bank (Image: Environment Agency)

“While Mr Price’s justification for the works was to help prevent flooding to local properties, his actions did not have any flood prevention benefit. The destruction of river banks is not appropriate flood management. It is important that the judge recognised that the works significantly weakened flood prevention measures rather than improved them.

“We urge landowners never to take extreme measure such as this and instead to always work closely with the Environment Agency around river management to agree the best solutions for both landowners and the environment.”

“Standing up for our environment” can another Tory candidate stand scrutiny?

Just how environmentally squeaky clean do you have to be to campaign under the pledge: “Standing up for our environment”? 

It seems to be becoming a bit of a challenge for some Tory candidates.

Cheryl McGauley, the Tory candidate running alongside deputy Tory leader Ben Ingham in Woodbury and Lympstone, holds a number of company directorships. 

According to Companies House, both she and her husband are the only two directors of WOODBURY CAR BREAKERS LIMITED (08364146), Incorporated in 2013.

Two enforcement notices by the Environment Agency were served on the company in June and then again in October 2016

Offender NameAddressAction Date
WOODBURY CAR BREAKERS LTDGilbrook, Exeter, Devon, EX5 1LG19/10/2016
WOODBURY CAR BREAKERS LTDGilbrook, Exeter, Devon, EX5 1LG08/06/2016

Obviously the voters will ultimately decide whether this candidate, or indeed any Tory candidates, are really committed to standing up for our environment.

Simon Jupp’s: “We must do all we can to protect our countryside, rivers and coastline” is becoming a hollow soundbite.

A House Divided. The Swires on Dominic Raab

First Sasha, according to The Times:

Sasha Swire — whose husband, Sir Hugo, helped co-ordinate Raab’s campaign — joked about it in her 2020 memoir, Diary of an MP’s Wife, depicting him as ambitious but gauche. When his name comes up as a possible contender, David and Samantha Cameron “shriek”. On meeting him for the first time, Sasha can’t decide “whether he is a real hottie or a bit nerdy”. “He appears a little frightened, a little unconfident,” she writes. Turning up at a Chequers meeting convened by the embattled Theresa May less than a fortnight later, Raab is described as looking “like he usually looks: sweaty and just out of the gym, and wanting to kill people”.

In her book Sasha Swire described Dominic Raab as looking “like he usually looks: sweaty and just out of the gym, and wanting to kill people”

Now Lord Hugo on the beeb

Hugo Swire, a Tory peer, said he thought Dominic Raab was “too big a talent” not to be back “in some capacity” following his resignation over bullying accusations.

Lord Swire told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme:

“I think to lose somebody who has been a justice secretary, a lord chancellor, deputy prime minister and foreign secretary at this stage is very unwise.”

PA reports he recounted Raab’s time standing in for Boris Johnson while the former prime minister was ill with Covid-19, saying there “were no criticisms of that at all”.

He continued:

“I think this is a career which has been brought prematurely to a temporary halt because I fundamentally believe that a talent such as Dominic will reappear in some place at some time.

It is the government’s loss. I think he will be back in some capacity.

I think he is too big a talent not to be.”

‘Raab goes down swinging’: what the papers say as deputy PM resigns

Dominic Raab has resigned as deputy prime minister after an official report found he had bullied civil servants. Let’s look at the reaction on the front pages.

www.theguardian.com 

We begin with the Guardian which says “Raab quits in fury”. It reports that the investigation by Adam Tolley KC cited “abuse of power”, but that Raab believes himself the victim of “activist civil servants” trying to block the Conservative government’s work.

The Daily Telegraph has “Row over Spanish forces in Gibraltar sank Raab”. It says the report found Raab “bullied a British ambassador said to have secretly proposed putting Spanish boots on the ground in Gibraltar during Brexit talks”.

The Daily Express is sympathetic, regarding Raab as having been “Forced out for wanting best for Britain”, which it says was a matter of “unwavering determination” for him according to allies.

“Was this the day Britain became ungovernable?” – dramatic stuff in the Daily Mail which picks up on Raab’s riposte that “flimsy complaints” such as those that brought him down make it “almost impossible” for ministers to “deliver for the British people”.

The Financial Times Weekend edition leads with complaints of a much more serious nature at Britain’s peak business lobby. “Big names quit CBI after new rape allegation”. Dominic Raab is in a picture spot, headlined “End of the road: Raab strikes defiant note as he resigns over bullying report”.

“Raab goes down swinging” sums it up well on the front of the Times. The deputy PM laments that you can be forced out under a “tyranny of subjective hurt feelings”.

“Raab officials angry at ‘tone-deaf’ resignation” is the angle in the i newspaper. One subheading says “Officials who worked under Raab hit back, telling i the ex-deputy PM is ‘arrogant’ and ‘playing the victim’”; another points out the official report branded Raab “intimidating” and “persistently aggressive”.

East Devon Conservative campaign loses all credibility

Simon Jupp chose this week to double down on how Tories will protect the environment, placing it centre stage: 

Simon Jupp MP talks the environment in his latest column – DevonLive.

In selecting Richard Parr, who was found guilty of running an unpermitted landfill site on his farm in 2021, as a candidate for the Exmouth Halsdon ward the East Devon Conservative campaign has lost all credibility. 

Did they fail to conduct “due diligence” in their selection process? Or are they taking the electorate for fools?

You see Owl carried the story in October 2021 under the heading: Environmental Damage in East Devon – Landowners to pay.

Not only did Richard Parr agree to pay £82,000 for his infringement at Higher Bagmores Farm, Woodbury, but our old friends F W S Carter & Sons Limited of Greendale Business Park and owners of Hogsbrook Farm in Woodbury Salterton also agreed to a sum of £24,000 for sewage pollution of the Grindle Brook and burning of waste on the farm in the same period.

A search of Companies House reveals the Exmouth Candidate is a man with fingers in a number of pies.

Richard Henry PARR personal appointments –

Total number of appointments 3

Date of birth

October 1965

Q TRACTOR & PLANT LTD (05292726)

Company status

Dissolved

Correspondence address

Higher Bagmoors, Rydon Lane, Woodbury, EX5 1LA

Role

Director

Appointed on

22 November 2004

AVON BRIDGE MACHINERY LIMITED (02592102)

Company status

Active

Correspondence address

Matford Home Farm, Matford, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom, EX2 8XT

Role Active

Director

Appointed on

19 March 1991

ALAMAC GARDEN MACHINERY LIMITED (02763843)

Company status

Dissolved

Correspondence address

Lowton Farm, Moretonhampstead, Newton Abbot, Devon, TQ13 8PN

Role Resigned

Director

Appointed on

1 April 2003

Resigned on

17 April 2003

Time for full disclosure?

Dear Simon do you need to talk? Owl has concerns for your welfare.

Having been a Special Adviser (SpAd) to Dominic Raab when he was Foreign Secretary, where he has been found to have engaged in “abuse or misuse of power” to undermine or humiliate staff, is there anything you need to talk about? 

This was obviously a very important and formative stepping stone in your political career.

Bullying is a serious problem that affects the lives of countless children and adults. No one should have to feel unsafe or threatened by someone else, but it happens all too often in our society. While bullying can manifest itself in many different forms, the effects it has on an individual are always significant. From mental health issues to decreased self-esteem and even perpetuating cycles of further bullying behavior, the consequences of bullying can have long-lasting and damaging impacts.

Dominic Raab resigns after two bullying complaints against him are upheld

Who used to boast about having been one of Dominic Raab’s SpAds on his CV? – Owl 

Jennifer Scott news.sky.com

Dominic Raab has resigned after he was found to have bullied staff members while working as a cabinet minister across different departments.

A report from independent investigator Adam Tolley said two complaints against him had been upheld, concluding the deputy prime minister had “acted in a way which was intimidating” and had been “unreasonably and persistently aggressive” in meetings.

The findings also said his conduct “involved an abuse or misuse of power in a way that undermines or humiliates”.

But in a resignation letter posted on Twitter, Mr Raab took issue with the report, calling the inquiry “flawed” and claiming the conclusions “set a dangerous precedent for the conduct of good government”.

In an article published in the Telegraph shortly after his ousting, the outgoing minister confirmed there had been a total of 15 allegations investigated – but also describe the probe as “a Kafkaesque saga”.

The news comes after Rishi Sunak was presented with an official report into Mr Raab’s behaviour on Thursday.

In a letter responding to the decision, Mr Sunak said he accepted his deputy’s resignation “with great sadness”, saying it “should not make us forget your record of delivery in both this government and previous administrations”.

And the PM said there had been “shortcomings in the historic process that have negatively affected everyone involved”, adding: “We should learn from this how to better handle such matters in future”.

But Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer said the situation showed “the continual weakness of the prime minister”, adding: “He should never have appointed [Mr Raab] in the first place… and then he didn’t sack him.

“It is that decision and that weakness I think that goes to the heart, not just of this prime minister, but of the 13 years now of [Conservative] failure and it is why people desperately want a change.”

Meanwhile, the Liberal Democrats called for Mr Raab to resign as an MP and for a by-election to be held in his seat, saying he had shown “he is not only unfit to serve as a minister, but is totally unfit to represent his constituents in parliament”.

In the letter addressed to the prime minister, Mr Raab wrote: “I called for the inquiry and undertook to resign, if it made any finding of bullying whatsoever. I believe it is important to keep my word.”

He said the report – carried out by independent investigator Adam Tolley KC – showed he had “not once, in four and a half years, sworn or shouted at anyone, let alone thrown anything or otherwise physically intimidated anyone, nor intentionally sought to belittle anyone”.

But he also attacked the findings, saying the inquiry had set “the threshold for bullying so low” that it had “set a dangerous precedent”.

Mr Raab added: “I am genuinely sorry for any unintended stress or offence that any officials felt, as a result of the pace, standards and challenge that I brought to the Ministry of Justice.

“That is, however, what the public expect of ministers working on their behalf.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Downing Street had to weigh up difficult judgements.’

In his newspaper article, Mr Raab gave more detail about the complaints made against him, saying some staff “complained that I asked too many questions, including in budget meetings with hundreds of millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money at stake, curtailed unwieldy interventions in meetings, or that they were intimidated or offended by my body language.

“These were dismissed.”

On the allegations that were upheld, he said the report concluded “I had abused my power by replacing a lead negotiator when I was foreign secretary, and as justice secretary had left senior officials feeling insulted on three occasions because of direct feedback”.

But he doubled-down on his attack on the process, saying “normal rules of evidence and procedural fairness were disapplied”, including a rule for all complaints to be made within three months.

“In my case, all the complaints were stored up for over three months, most over eight months, some for over four years – and then submitted in a coordinated way,” he claimed.

“And I was subject to trial by media for six months, fuelled by warped and fabricated accounts leaked by anonymous officials.”

Labour’s Sir Keir accused Mr Raab of “whining” when the public wanted to hear about things that mattered to them.

“There is a bigger picture here,” he said. “We have got a cost of living crisis, there is the future of the NHS that is really, really important… and we are mired in talking about the weaknesses and the inability of the government to actually deliver anything for the people of this country.

“I don’t know why Dominic Raab thinks in the middle of a cost of living crisis that anybody wants to hear about his whining about having to resign.

“What I think everybody wants is strong leadership and that has been palpably absent here.

“Why on earth was Raab appointed in the first place? Why on earth didn’t the prime minister act more quickly? Why on earth isn’t the government laser focuses on the cost of living crisis and the absolute mess of the NHS that they have made?”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The Labour leader says that the resignation of the deputy prime minitser and justice secretary shows there is weakness at the top of the Tory party.

The civil service union, the FDA, called for an independent inquiry into ministerial bullying following the findings of the report.

General secretary Dave Penman said: “This resignation is not a vindication of the current system, it’s a damning indictment of the inadequacy of a process that relies solely on the prime minister of the day to enforce standards.”

Mike Clancy, the boss of another civil service union Prospect, also said there had been “a toxic culture at the top of government for too long with civil servants and public trust paying the price for this chaos”, calling on Mr Sunak to now “clean out the rest of the stables”.

He added: “These issues go to the heart of the anger and distrust many people feel towards the way our country runs. It is time for ministers to step up and to start restoring trust both for civil servants and the good of the country.”

Mr Raab was appointed by Mr Sunak after he took power in October, and less than 48 hours ago was sat alongside the PM at Prime Minister’s Questions.

Allegations surfaced about Mr Raab back in November, with former staff claiming he created a “culture of fear” in their departments.

He denied the allegations and requested an investigation into himself after two formal complaints were made.

As the weeks rolled on, more accusations came to light, with one report suggesting as many as 24 complaints had been made.

Mr Sunak has come under pressure over what he knew about Mr Raab’s alleged conduct, with a source telling political editor Beth Rigby the PM was informed about Mr Raab’s “unacceptable behaviour” before appointing him as his deputy and justice secretary.

Downing Street said Mr Sunak was “not aware” of any “formal complaints” about Mr Raab when he appointed him, but Number 10 did not deny concerns had been expressed informally.

Who could take over as the next justice secretary?

They will be the 10th justice secretary in 10 years and will also serve as lord chancellor, responsible for protecting and upholding the rule of law and independence of the judiciary.

For this reason, it is often the case that MPs with legal experience – normally as barristers – are the typical picks for the role.

Some names in the frame:

• Lucy Frazer: Currently culture secretary. Ex-solicitor general and junior minister at the MoJ. Former barrister.

• Victoria Prentis: Currently attorney general. Ex-senior government lawyer. Held several junior ministerial posts. Served four years on the justice select committee.

• Victoria Atkins: Currently financial secretary to the Treasury. Was a junior minister at the MoJ. Former criminal barrister.

• Oliver Dowden: Currently Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster based in the Cabinet Office. Considered a favourite. Seen as one of Mr Sunak’s closest and most trusted political allies.

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has previously accused the PM of ignoring reports about Mr Raab’s conduct.

Mr Raab’s departure follows Mr Sunak’s decision to dismiss Tory party chairman Nadhim Zahawi from his post in January after the former chancellor was found to have broken the ministerial code over his tax affairs.

EDDC Tory candidate hits the National News

Tory council candidate who ran illegal landfill operation now campaigning on green credentials

A Conservative council candidate in Devon who is promoting his green credentials paid £82,000 to a local environmental group after being found guilty of running an unpermitted landfill site on his farm.

Makes a mockery of;

Tory local election Pledge 3 Standing up for our environment. You have told us how important  protecting green spaces and the natural environment is to you. We will make this a priority for this Council.

David Parsley inews.co.uk

Richard Parr, who is standing in May’s local elections to become an East Devon District councillor for the Exmouth Halsdon ward, claims in his campaign literature that a vote for him would protect the environment.

However, Mr Parr fails to mention that in 2021 he was found by the Environment Agency to have run an unpermitted waste operation on land near Exeter between June 2016 and March 2018.

In a campaign leaflet that Mr Parr shares with fellow Conservative candidate Pauline Stott, he highlights the protection of the environment among his and Ms Stott’s six key pledges to local people.

Richard Parr shares his campaign leaflet with fellow Tory candidate Pauline Stott (Photo: Supplied)

The leaflet states that the pair will be “standing up for our environment” if elected and will “protect our seas and rivers”.

The leaflet adds: “You have told us how important protecting green spaces and the natural environment is to you. We will make this a priority for the council.”

When asked about his unpermitted waste operation, his campaign partner Ms Stott told i: “I don’t even know him.”

She added: “I am all for protecting the environment and I am utterly shocked by this.”

Mr Parr adds that he will protect "green spaces and the natural environment" (Photo: Supplied)

Mr Parr claims that he will protect ‘green spaces and the natural environment’ (Photo: Supplied)

Following the investigation, the Environment Agency accepted an Enforcement Undertaking from Mr Parr, which is a type of civil sanction and a voluntary offer to put right the effects of the offence.

As part of the settlement of the case, Mr Parr also agreed to pay £82,000 to the North Devon Biosphere Foundation, which runs a Unesco Biosphere Reserve.

He also committed to carrying out restoration work on his farm, to obtain advice from an external consultant, to cease all waste movements into the site, complete construction of silage clamps and to cover the Environment Agency’s costs associated with its investigation.

Dan Wilson, who is standing as a Labour candidate in the same Exmouth Halsdon ward, said: “For the Conservatives to send out leaflets that claim they’re ‘Standing up for the environment’ whilst simultaneously standing a candidate who has been investigated for polluting, shows a complete lack of decency and integrity.”

When i approached Mr Parr for comment, he said: “I have held and operated waste permits since 2008 and it wasn’t until the end of 2016 that an issue occurred.

“I applied for planning permission, again to make improvements to the farm and on this being approved, I mistakenly took in stone without ensuring my waste competent manager had completed the recovery plan for the capacity on the waste exemption for this new area.

“Since this incident, we have taken guidance from the Environment Agency as to how we can enhance the farms improvements further.”

The East Devon Conservative Association did not respond to requests for comment.