Another Council, another investigation – Owl

Northumberland county council operated in a “climate of fear and intimidation” so extreme that senior officers and councillors were constantly making freedom of information (FoI) requests to dig dirt on each other, a report has found.

Helen Pidd www.theguardian.com 

An independent governance review into the council found it had become “paralysed” due to the “extraordinary” resources devoted to processing almost 5,000 FoI requests made within three years, many from senior officers and councillors.

A second report into the local authority found that its chief executive, Daljit Lally, had been given illegal expense payments of £40,000 each year, on top of her £190,000 a year salary, to run the council’s international consultancy with clients in China and the United Arab Emirates.

The two reports were discussed at an extraordinary meeting of Northumberland county council (NCC) on Wednesday.

The first, by independent consultant Max Caller, who investigated financial mismanagement at Liverpool city council last year, concluded: “NCC needs to undergo a fundamental reset of its philosophy, processes, and relationships … There is little substantive trust in the most senior officer levels of the council and there exists a climate of fear and intimidation.”

He found an organisation so paranoid that all council papers are now watermarked with names because so many had been leaked. Employees “described in harrowing terms how they had been treated extremely poorly by senior officers at NCC”, he said, adding: “Being able to speak truth to power is an essential component of local government and power is held by both members and top officers, but this did not appear to be either encouraged or even tolerated.”

The council is “paralysed due to large volumes of procedural issues which demand an extraordinary resource”, he wrote, saying: “There have been 4792 FOIs in three years and 307 subject access requests (SARs), many from senior officers and members. One SAR for a member of staff took one colleague two and a half months to complete. The review team were informed that staff had been instructed by senior officers to prioritise some staff and member SARs, the result being that SAR requests, for example, [on behalf of] children looked after, had been delayed.” People can make a SAR to access their personal data.

He also found an unusually large number of staff signed non-disclosure agreements after leaving Northumberland. This meant they could not speak to anybody about the circumstances of their employment with and exit from NCC.

In addition, he uncovered unusually high settlements paid to staff leaving the council, with the organisation spending £2.2m on payoffs between February 2013 and February 2019.

Some settlements were suspicious in their timing, he suggested: “One interviewee described how a colleague informed them that they were retiring in a few months, and they would hand over their responsibilities to another colleague. The interviewee was surprised to then find that the colleague had left within a few days of this conversation. This happened to be immediately prior to the government rules on a cap in exit payments [in the public sector] of £95K coming into force.”

A second report, by NCC’s interim chief finance officer, Jan Willis, found that an international healthcare consultancy – Northumbria International Alliance (NIA) – set up by the council in 2017 to provide commercial income had operated illegally by not being incorporated as a business.

“In entering into international contracts directly, NCC acted unlawfully, and it therefore follows that the expenditure incurred in delivering those contracts was also unlawful,” concluded Willis.

She was particularly critical of the decision to give Lally £40,000 on top of her chief executive salary to consult for NIA. “The international allowance was not paid as a result of any decision taken by a properly authorised decision maker,” concluded Willis, instructing the council’s payroll team to cease the payment with immediate effect.

Willis’ report, known as a section 114 report, does not “seek to attribute any individual blame or responsibility for actions or omissions that have led to the unlawful expenditure identified in this report and should not be read as such”.

CEO says it’s “inappropriate” to rush

Ollie Heptinstall, local democracy reporter www.radioexe.co.uk 

East Devon District Council (EDDC) has been urged to speed up a report into how jailed former councillor John Humphreys was able to receive an honorary title while under investigation for sex crimes against children.

Two months on from a full council meeting asking for an independent report, work is still going on about options for how it will be done.

Councillors want a report from chief executive Mark Williams “at the earliest opportunity” but some speakers at this week’s cabinet meeting expressed frustration at how long it is taking, with publication set for July.

Mr Humphreys, who also previously served as mayor of Exmouth, is 10 months into a 21-year prison sentence for sexually assaulting two teenage boys in the early 1990s and early 2000s.

He was first questioned in 2005 but police did not find sufficient evidence for a prosecution.

Following a complaint by a second victim, he was arrested in 2016 before being released under investigation on suspicion of sexually assaulting the two boys.

Nothing was made public and Mr Humphreys continued to be a councillor until May 2019, eventually being awarded the honorary title of alderman by by EDDC in December that year.

The award of alderman is made by many councils to former members in recognition of their civic contributions. In East Devon, aldermen are entitled to free parking in the council’s car parks and may continue to represent the council at some functions.

Following Mr Humphreys’ conviction in August 2021, the council voted to remove his title and to review the process of selecting aldermen.

That review, by EDDC councillors, has so far only looked at peripheral matters such as whether aldermen should keep their free car parking permits. 

The new report will be independently conducted and delve deeper into how he came to receive the award.

Speaking at Wednesday’s [8 June] cabinet meeting, Alderman Roger Giles said the decision to bestow the award on Mr Humphreys after he had been arrested had “tarnished the whole system of recognising the work of former councillors.

“Of course, the tarnishing of the award of honorary alderman status is of infinitely less consequence than the effect on the victims of the abhorrent crimes of John Humphreys,” he added.

Mr Giles, who represented Ottery Town as an independent, said he was attending the meeting “to ask what EDDC is doing about what is undoubtedly the greatest scandal that has enveloped EDDC for very many years.”

He was critical of the seven weeks that had elapsed since councillors voted for a report, with no visible progress.

“What kind of message does this send to the wider world about the seriousness and urgency with which EDDC is treating this matter?” Mr Giles asked.

Councillor Jess Bailey (Independent, West Hill and Aylesbeare) was also “very disappointed by how long it’s taking,” adding after the meeting: “The council needs to stop dragging its heels and urgently commission the report given the importance of the issue.”

In response, chief executive Mr Williams said he has spoken to a barrister for legal advice and was awaiting his opinion.

“When I have that opinion, I will prepare a report. But if this is to be done properly, it needs to be done in a measured way and it also needs to be done in full knowledge of the legal powers and legal constraints that apply to the council.

“So my advice to cabinet is that I will bring a report in July. Pushing the timetable earlier is inappropriate and you may well end up making an erroneous decision.”

Mr Williams added: “You need to go into this with your eyes open in terms of the length of time it’s likely to take, the potential cost and also the implications legally of what we can or can’t do.

“Rushing something as important as this is, in my opinion, inappropriate.”

The England and Wales water regulator, Ofwat, has unlawfully failed to stop water companies discharging raw sewage into rivers, campaigners say in a legal case.

Sandra Laville www.theguardian.com 

The environmental campaign group Wild Justice is seeking a judicial review of Ofwat’s failure to monitor and take enforcement action against water firms that discharge raw sewage into waterways.

In documents filed to the high court, Dr Ruth Tingay, director of Wild Justice, said: “We are particularly concerned that a continued lack of action on Ofwat’s part will lead to a collapse in biodiversity, both within rivers and coastal waters, and, as a knock-on effect, in the areas surrounding those waters. This will be disastrous for nature conservation generally and wildlife in particular.”

The legal action is supported by investigations by Wild Justice and Windrush Against Sewage Pollution (Wasp), which used environmental information requests and freedom of information laws to reveal, according to the legal action, that Ofwat takes no active steps to monitor and enforce its legal obligations to reduce and stop sewage discharges. When serious concerns are brought directly to its attention, the legal case says, Ofwat has not taken action.

Wild Justice says the failure to act is having a serious impact on watercourses affected by sewage plants that do not conform with the urban waste water treatment (UWWT) regulations and regularly empty raw sewage into freshwater. They say the regulator has a legal duty under the Water Industry Act 1991 and the UWWT regulations to monitor and enforce water and sewage companies’ actions.

The consequences are extreme, creating and maintaining excessive nutrient levels that are highly detrimental to the health and biodiversity of those watercourses, with wider implications for the environment and human health of freshwater and marine ecosystems, they say.

They say anyone whose hobby or profession brings them into contact with potentially infected water – surfers, rowers, anglers and wild swimmers for example – is at risk.

Raw sewage was discharged into rivers 375,000 times over more than 2.7m hours in 2021, according to Environment Agency data.

Carol Day, of Leigh Day solicitors, representing Wild Justice, said: “Our client is bringing this case because it wants action to be taken to protect our waterways. Wild Justice is of the view that had Ofwat fulfilled its statutory duty to ensure sewage treatments works are fit for purpose in the 21st century, the widespread and damaging discharge of untreated sewage into our rivers and seas could have been averted.”

Wild Justice is funding its actions through a crowdfunding appeal.

An investigation by MPs on the environmental audit committee earlier this year called for a step change in regulatory action by Ofwat and investment by water companies to restore rivers to good ecological health, protect biodiversity and adapt to a changing climate.

MPs said: “The water regulator, Ofwat, has hitherto focused on security of water supply and on keeping bills down with insufficient emphasis on facilitating the investment necessary to ensure that the sewerage system in England is fit for the 21st century.”

Only 14% of rivers are in good biological health. There has been no improvement in the state of English rivers since 2016, despite government promises that by 2027 75% of English rivers would be rated good.

A public outcry at the scale of raw sewage discharges, which are supposed to take place only after exceptional rainfall, has forced the government to act, saying the level of releases is totally unacceptable. It is consulting on a plan to reduce discharges, promising that by 2040, 40% will have been eliminated. But campaigners say the plan lacks urgency.

Ofwat said: “Ofwat’s focus has always been, and continues to be, ensuring companies act in the interests of customers and the environment. We take our responsibilities on the environment extremely seriously and have consistently pushed companies to do the same.

“While we share Wild Justice’s concern with the potential impact of water companies’ wastewater activities on the environment, their characterisation and understanding of Ofwat’s work is incorrect.

“We drive improved environmental performance from water companies and hold them to account to deliver on their obligations. This includes significant monitoring and information gathering on water companies, and holding them to account through our enforcement powers, our price review process, our annual reporting and more.

“Where companies fall short, we act – over the last five years, for example, we have imposed penalties and payments of over £250 million. In addition, we have a live investigation into wastewater treatment works which is looking at potential non-compliance in all water and wastewater companies.”

Three members of the public: Alderman Roger Giles, Mark Hawkins (a contributor to the “Watch”) and Councillor Jess Bailey all raised questions, given the evidence, about how long it is taking to set up the inquiry into Humphreys. They did this during public speaking at the beginning of yesterday’s (8 June) Cabinet meeting. A report on possible ways forward is scheduled for the July Cabinet “the earliest opportunity”, which will include advice from counsel. 

It is worth listening to the first 25 minutes of the meeting to hear the public speakers and the subsequent discussion. Especially the explanation over why it is taking a long time from an uncomfortable looking CEO Mark Williams (who also raises questions of costs and timescales),  and Leader Paul Arnott reading out the latest correspondence from the police.

It is clear from listening to the discussion that councillors are committed to ensure that this is not kicked into the long grass. But Owl does not underestimate the task. 

It is the lack of institutional transparency to date, for example over Simon Jupp use of a property belonging to Humphrey that has turned this case into a potential can of worms. There will be many who would find obfuscation and administrative delay advantageous.

Let’s hope Mark Williams hasn’t consulted “Jarndyce and Jarndyce”

So many questions, too few answers.

Campaigners and the Liberal Democrats have condemned the government after a minister overruled a Tory-run council to approve gas drilling on the edge of the Surrey Hills, despite accepting the scheme would cause harm to the natural landscape.

Under this government nowhere will be safe from drilling. – Owl

Peter Walker www.theguardian.com 

The decision, formally announced in a written statement by the housing minister Stuart Andrew, gives the green light to three years of exploratory drilling at a site near the edge of the Surrey Hills area of outstanding natural beauty (AONB).

The site is in the South West Surrey constituency of Jeremy Hunt, the former health secretary, who strongly opposes the project.

Campaigners said the decision showed an “obsession” with finding new fossil fuel developments, and that it would be likely to provoke protests.

The plan was rejected by Surrey county council, but a subsequent public inquiry recommended it should go ahead, a decision which was then assessed by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, which approved it.

It means the energy company UK Oil and Gas will be allowed to operate a non-fracking gas well near Dunsfold, south of Guildford, close to the boundary of the AONB, with permission for a new road junction, access route and fence around the boundary.

The decision – made by Andrew after Michael Gove, the levelling up secretary, recused himself because his constituency is in a nearby part of Surrey – accepted the drilling would involve “a significant level of landscape and visual impacts from the proposal”, including the loss of hedgerows, something mitigated by the finite period of operation.

Noting that allowing the project contravened Surrey’s own guidance, the decision also conceded “it has not been demonstrated that the site has been selected to minimise adverse environmental impacts”.

The proposal, it added, “would result in harm to the landscape character and appearance of the area and degrade the qualities of the setting of the AONB”, saying that while the impact on the AONB would be limited, the area “is of a high sensitivity”.

The ministerial decision said “limited” weight should be given to any local economic benefits, but that the overall assessment was “exploration and appraisal are a necessary part of mineral development and without it, the currently acknowledged benefits of production cannot be realised”.

Sign up to First Edition, our free daily newsletter – every weekday morning at 7am BST

While the decision is unconnected to fracking, permission for an exploratory gas drilling site in such a location will resurrect memories of prior protests against fracking schemes.

Following significant local opposition, along with concerns about the possibility of earth tremors, fracking has been paused in the UK since 2019. In April, ministers announced a study into its safety, raising expectations that the practice, which is popular with some Conservative MPs, could be resumed.

Greenpeace said ministers had an “unhealthy obsession with finding new fossil fuels”. Doug Parr, its UK policy director, said: “With this decision the government is completely undermining local democracy, the planning laws that are supposed to protect our designated landscapes and the climate crisis in one fell swoop.”

Tom Fyans, the head of policy at the countryside charity CPRE said the move was “an absurd decision that’s guaranteed to provoke fury and despair”, and would be likely to prompt mass protests. He said: “It’s extraordinary, given the urgent need to wean ourselves off fossil fuels, that the government sees fit to green-light a gas field and damage the setting of an area of outstanding natural beauty.”

The decision will be seized on by the Liberal Democrats, who are campaigning heavily in the so-called blue wall – Tory-held commuter belt seats mainly around London where discontent with the Conservatives, and especially with Boris Johnson, makes them politically vulnerable.

While Hunt’s seat is relatively safe, the site closely adjoins the Guildford constituency, where the sitting Tory MP, Angela Richardson, has a majority of just above 3,000 over the Lib Dems.

Ed Davey, the Lib Dem leader, said it was “shameful that the Conservatives have ignored the concerns of local communities” and approved the scheme. “Michael Gove must reconsider this reckless decision which risks doing irreparable damage to our treasured countryside while undermining efforts to tackle the climate emergency,” he said.

UK Oil and Gas was contacted for comment.

Fears of a precedent that will encourage more homes along the coastline have been voiced after plans for a dwelling were approved. At its May planning committee, Torridge District Council approved an application from Mrs Susan McEldon for the erection of a detached dwelling and garage at her property, Koversada, off Diddywell Road in Appledore.

Lewis Clarke www.devonlive.com

The applicant’s son, James McEldon, spoke at the meeting: “My wife and I are a local couple with a vision to build our forever home. Both myself and my wife were born and bred in the local area. My wife is from the lovely village of Hartland, and I was raised in the picturesque village of Appledore. We’re both very much in full support of the local community.

“I have worked as a branch manager for a builder’s merchant for the past five years, and my wife is a police community support officer serving local communities for the past 14 years.

“This build would be our forever home to raise a family and be in the catchment area of local education and facilities that we like to support, such as shops, pubs, and restaurants, all within walking distance of the property.

“This would be a sustainable build that is aesthetically pleasing to the local area with thought put in through my building knowledge put towards the build energy efficiency where possible, such as solar panels and electric car charging points.

“The plot is easily an adequate size to accommodate both the existing property of Koversada and this new build.”

He said the new home would allow them to assist in caring for their elderly parents as they grow older and avoid having to send them to a care home.

“We are struggling to find a property nearby,” he said. “We looked at the new builds recently at Pitt Lane in Appledore and were informed by the site agent that all of the first phase has already been snapped up within just one week. So many houses in this area are sadly bought for holiday accommodation.”

Agent Shorne Tilbey added: “This application, if approved, could be controlled by suitable conditions, so, therefore, the new dwelling would not be considered an open market dwelling, therefore removing problems such.”

However, some councillors were against the scheme. Councillor Peter Hames (Appledore, Green Party) said: “It’s very important to stress that you have an application here for a dwelling in an area of undeveloped coast which is protected from development under strategic policies.

“The position is that development which detracts from the unspoiled character, appearance and tranquillity in the area should not be permitted. I should emphasise that reference to the area includes the proposed development site and the countryside surrounding it.”

Cllr Hames said the proposal would introduce a new dwelling in the area with no justifiable function or requirement.

“A perusal of the site and the plan for the application confirms the findings of your officer and policies would not be satisfied by the proposed development,” he said.

“The proposed house would be built next to a Victorian building, in a different and contemporary style and with different materials. Therefore, it would strongly detract visually from the present scene. It would occupy much of the garden space and would encroach on the amenity of Koversada, and the occupants would generate more vehicular traffic on a narrow lane which enters a blind junction just yards from the site.

“The new dwelling, built in a different style to the present one, would also adversely impact on the wider, undeveloped coast as well as the AONB and SSI, an impact exacerbated by the dwelling in close proximity to the present house.”

He continued: “I gather that the house is necessary so son and wife can look after her and her husband in their old age. I certainly sympathise; however, the planning officer has shown their provisions do not apply to this application.

“Approval of this would set a precedent encouraging more applicants of similar or other special family circumstances to apply for houses in the undeveloped coastal and open countryside. In addition, of course, the suggested purpose and justification for the dwelling can only be a temporary situation as, unfortunately, it is inevitable that occupants of Koversada will not always be there.”

Councillor Peter Christie (Bideford North, Green Party) agreed: “This is an open market house, and no local need being specified. If they want to put a house in for local needs, I have no problem, but as it stands at the moment, this doesn’t agree with any of our policies. Once the current owners pass on, you have two houses, and for locals, you’ll end up with two houses you have to buy at once. It would be unaffordable to anyone locally.”

However, the majority of councillors backed the scheme.

Councillor Len Ford (Appledore, Non-Aligned), who called in the application for debate, following a recommendation from the office to refuse, stated: “I believe there is a balance to be struck reference social gain and to provide a family support network. Surely me/or the committee could impose conditions or ties (new house and existing must go together should future use or sale happen).

Councillor Dermot McGeough (Bideford North, Conservative) agreed: “I propose we accept this application. The benefit for the family is paramount to local people. We have locals not being able to come to the village and being moved out of the area, but I believe it is a sustainable development which doesn’t impact the amenity of neighbours. I don’t know the family, but I believe that we should not refuse this.”

Councillor Chris Leather (Northam, Independent) added: “This is one of the difficult ones, where you want to help house local families, but do we think that the tilted balance is in favour of this development because there’s no huge detrimental impact on the area because this is already within the curtilage of a dwelling.

“I don’t think another modern dwelling close by will have any detraction.

“To me, if this was a field where a small plot of land off the lane, I would have a different view about it but because it is within the curtilage of an existing dwelling and unless there are any benefits in not doing this.”

• Replacement lean-to side extension Leacroft Touring Park Colyton Hill Colyton EX24 6HYRef. No: 22/1184/FUL | Validated: Fri 27 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Change of use from garage to home office and alterations to fenestration Maple House Bickwell Valley Sidmouth EX10 8SGRef. No: 22/1191/FUL | Validated: Fri 27 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Erection of replacement outbuilding to include home office, garden room and water tank storage. The Linhay Branscombe Seaton EX12 3BXRef. No: 22/1188/FUL | Validated: Fri 27 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Construction of access stairs and small terrace. 18 Victoria Road Exmouth Devon EX8 1DLRef. No: 22/1169/FUL | Validated: Thu 26 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Two storey side extension, porch to front, alterations to fenestration and demolition of existing conservatory and entrance porch Tir Na Nog Lanehead Beer EX12 3BYRef. No: 22/1170/FUL | Validated: Thu 26 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Replacement of existing garage with two storey extension 19 Buttery Road Honiton Devon EX14 2FARef. No: 22/1171/FUL | Validated: Thu 26 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Single storey rear extension. 7 Knowle Village Knowle Budleigh Salterton EX9 6ALRef. No: 22/1172/FUL | Validated: Thu 26 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Construction of replacement side extension 60 Malden Road Sidmouth Devon EX10 9NARef. No: 22/1175/FUL | Validated: Thu 26 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Change of use of barn for housing of horse, hay and straw and construction of horse menage. Lochinvar Woodbury Exeter EX5 1LARef. No: 22/1155/FUL | Validated: Fri 27 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Single storey rear extension Little Acre Toby Lane Woodbury Salterton Devon EX5 1PURef. No: 22/1158/FUL | Validated: Wed 25 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision

• Application for approval of reserved matters (appearance, scale, layout and landscape) following approval of outline application No. 18/2608/OUT. Land South Of King Alfred Way Newton PopplefordRef. No: 22/1167/RES | Validated: Fri 27 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Single storey side extension. 7 Belvedere Road Exmouth Devon EX8 1QNRef. No: 22/1153/FUL | Validated: Wed 25 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Prior approval for the change of use of existing agricultural barn to 1no. single storey 3-bed dwelling Windrush Poltimore Exeter EX4 0ABRef. No: 22/1166/PDQ | Validated: Wed 25 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Rear roof slope flat roof dormer extension Esgair Higher Meadows Beer EX12 3EZRef. No: 22/1154/FUL | Validated: Fri 27 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Enlargement of drive to provide space for off street parking. 16 Alexandria Road Sidmouth EX10 9HBRef. No: 22/1162/FUL | Validated: Wed 25 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Two storey side extension, removal of single storey side extension, removal of two storey side conservatory extension, reinstatement of balcony and alterations to fenestration. 16 Fore Street Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6NGRef. No: 22/1136/FUL | Validated: Thu 26 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Proposed extension to existing cattle building Springs Sandy Lane Broadclyst EX5 3ANRef. No: 22/1150/FUL | Validated: Thu 26 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• T1, Turkey Oak : crown raise up to 5 metres ; reduce height by 3 metres from 13 metres to leave a finished height of 10 metres; thin crown by 20 % restricting cut diameter to 60 mm to leave a balanced shape. T2, English Oak : reduce height by 2 metres from 10 metres to 8 metres to allow more light into the surrounding gardens whilst adhering to best arboricultural practices. 7 Oakwood Rise Exmouth EX8 4PURef. No: 22/1142/TRE | Validated: Tue 24 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Retrospective Householder Planning Application, Proposed Single Storey Side Extension with Roof Terrace Garden & internal alterations Sherwood Foxholes Hill Exmouth Devon EX8 2DFRef. No: 22/1143/FUL | Validated: Tue 24 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Earth lined slurry lagoon. Cooksmoor Farm Stockland Honiton EX14 9NHRef. No: 22/1140/FUL | Validated: Tue 24 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision

• Outline application with all matters reserved for the erection of 2no. dwellings. Land North East Of Clyst William Cross PlymtreeRef. No: 22/1138/OUT | Validated: Tue 24 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• T1, Ash : Fell. The tree has a very poor canopy, due to ash dieback and is of very low amenity value. The tree has now lost much of its canopy and is deteriorating rapidly. Additionally the root plate is losing structural integrity thereby compromising its stability. 7 Old Home Farm Rousdon Lyme Regis DT7 3YLRef. No: 22/1152/TCA | Validated: Tue 24 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Erection of an office building with a first floor viewing room Air Westward Dunkeswell Airfield Dunkeswell Industrial Estate Honiton EX14 4LGRef. No: 22/1137/FUL | Validated: Thu 26 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• T1 : Reduce via thinning lowest lateral branches to west and north-east by removing dominant leaders approx. 1.5-2m in length; climbing inspection in order to assess damaged area where previous limb failure occurred. T2 : Reduce low hanging branches away from building and aerial in order to attain a clearance of approx. 1.5 metres; own lift small branches to 4 metres Rose Lodge 2 Isca Road Exmouth EX8 2EZRef. No: 22/1147/TRE | Validated: Tue 24 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• T1, Yew : Prune to give 1 metre lateral clearance to adjacent property. T2, Pine : Pre-existing brace has failed/snapped. Prune to reduce end weight making 1 x 200mm target pruning cut retaining 1 side branch to East and 1 side branch to Southeast. Powys House All Saints Road Sidmouth EX10 8DERef. No: 22/1145/TCA | Validated: Tue 24 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Earth lined slurry lagoon. Land Near Moorpits YarcombeRef. No: 22/1139/FUL | Validated: Tue 24 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Alterations and extension to garage 33B Monkton Road Honiton Devon EX14 1PZRef. No: 22/1133/FUL | Validated: Mon 23 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Single storey rear extension, porch to front and demolition of existing rear store. 17 East Budleigh Road Budleigh Salterton EX9 6HNRef. No: 22/1130/FUL | Validated: Mon 23 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Single storey side extension, single storey rear extension and porch to front. Danes Hill House Dalwood Axminster EX13 7HHRef. No: 22/1135/FUL | Validated: Mon 23 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Single storey side/rear extension. 36 Seymour Road Exmouth Devon EX8 3JGRef. No: 22/1132/FUL | Validated: Mon 23 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision

• Single storey garage extension 12 Shortwood Close Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6QWRef. No: 22/1125/FUL | Validated: Tue 24 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Single storey rear extension and conversion of garage to a storeroom and W/C. 23 Hereford Close Exmouth Devon EX8 5QTRef. No: 22/1131/FUL | Validated: Thu 26 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Internal alterations to existing rear extension with alteration to fenestration Queen Anne House The Strand Lympstone EX8 5JWRef. No: 22/1120/LBC | Validated: Tue 24 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Internal alterations to existing rear extension with alteration to fenestration Queen Anne House The Strand Lympstone EX8 5JWRef. No: 22/1119/FUL | Validated: Tue 24 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Change of use of land from agricultural to agricultural/residential and the provision of enlarged gardens and mixed agriculture/residential for the existing properties Winslade Barton 4 The Old Stables Clyst St Mary EX5 1ATRef. No: 22/1102/FUL | Validated: Tue 24 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Extension of existing residential dwelling incorporating existing commercial outbuilding to form home working space. Fairview House Axmouth EX12 4ABRef. No: 22/1105/FUL | Validated: Tue 24 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Outline application with all matters reserved for the erection of a single storey 2-bed detached dwelling. Hasta La Vista Windmill Lane West Hill Devon EX11 1JPRef. No: 22/1094/OUT | Validated: Wed 25 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Certificate of Lawful Development for a Proposed construction of an Orangery room.Cornerway Poltimore Exeter EX4 0ARRef. No: 22/1090/CPL | Validated: Wed 25 May 2022 | Status: Refused
• Retrospective application for a wooden platform to be used as a tiki bar in rear garden 6 Everest Drive Seaton EX12 2EDRef. No: 22/1088/FUL | Validated: Mon 23 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Proposed 2 storey rear extension to replace existing conservatory and balcony 21 Highbury Park Exmouth EX8 3EJRef. No: 22/1061/FUL | Validated: Tue 24 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision

• Single storey side extension, two storey side extension, single storey rear extension and porch to front. Amberwood Nursing Home 231 Exeter Road Exmouth EX8 3EDRef. No: 22/1063/FUL | Validated: Mon 23 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Single storey rear extension and demolition of existing single storey rear extension. 24 Armytage Road Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6SDRef. No: 22/1013/FUL | Validated: Tue 24 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Demolition of existing dwelling and construction of seven dwellings, with associated landscaping and access Stoke Cottage Stoke Canon Exeter EX5 4ATRef. No: 22/0992/FUL | Validated: Tue 24 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Conversion of Fore Street No 34 and No 34A to a single 5 x bed dwelling house with a single storey rear extension and reduction of stone wall, installation of passenger lift and alterations to fenestration. 34 The Creamery Fore Street Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6NHRef. No: 22/0864/FUL | Validated: Mon 23 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Erection of a shed in the back garden 3 Socks Hill Smallridge EX13 7JNRef. No: 22/0826/FUL | Validated: Fri 27 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Addition of an entrance porch 113 St Johns Road Exmouth EX8 4EHRef. No: 22/0589/FUL | Validated: Mon 23 May 2022 | Status: Awaiting decision

Paul Arnott: article in Midweek Herald

Avid readers of this column may (or may not) have noticed an absence of articles by me in the local papers in recent weeks.

This coincided with the period leading up to and after the Annual Council meeting at East Devon, where all sorts can kick off when the Leader for the coming year is discussed and then elected by 60 councillors. Far be it from me to draw any comparisons with our own national leader, but if I must … the vote for me was unanimous, cross-party, with one abstention. Whereas in the House of Commons Mr Johnson would be lucky to muster much more than a quarter of MPs to vote for him. He has no mandate now.

However, by chance, here in East and Mid Devon the electorate can now properly and fully show that we reject the values of The Man With No Shame on the 23^rd June and in the postal vote before that. And we can now see the content of the leaflets distributed by the two realistic contenders to win: Helen Hurford and Richard Foorde.

In the possible event of a Conservative win, I may find myself working with Helen as Leader at EDDC, so I have no intention of being negative about her; she seems like a nice person. The leaflet written for her by Conservative Head Office, however, made me laugh out loud.

Out comes the usual spin about the NHS safe in her hands. Helen, in my area alone your party has closed in-patient beds at Axminster, Honiton and Seaton. During the pandemic, there was no intermediate place for recovering Covid-19 patients to be discharged, and instead they went from the RD&E to care homes, leading as proved in the High Court to the needless deaths of residents.

There is talk about support for farmers. The one thing my conversations with Neil Parish, head of the agriculture committee in the Commons, most revealed, was his personal despair that in the six years since the 2016 referendum, farmers had been utterly let down by his government. To his credit, he spoke bravely about this in Parliament.

So no, like the NHS, farming does not need another obedient Tory MP. The Liberal candidate, Richard Foord, a local lad like Helen, is so clearly across all this in his leaflets. As he is on the cost of living, energy bill crisis and so on.

 In Helen’s leaflets there is a vague promise about more investment in Devon under the Levelling Up Scheme. I’ve been in meetings with government about this, and all they want to do is pile money into the “Red Wall” seats. So actually we would be better off with a Non-Tory MP, where a fearful government might pay some attention to East and Mid Devon for a change.

I hit 60 last November, and all my life I have been cautious about joining a national party. Where we live, I am really proud that we lead the council as an effective and kind coalition of East Devon Alliance Independents (EDA), LibDems, Greens and an Independent. I love the EDA, what it is continuing to achieve. We cannot stand nationally under our constitution, and that’s what we want.

But at a national level, it’s time for me to get off the fence. If not now, when? After 42 years as a voter, I’m finally nailing my colours to a national mast for Parliamentary elections, and have just become a member of the Liberal Democrats nationally. The time has come for me, and the time has come, if ever there was one, for this constituency to become Liberal Democrat too. If you are young, use the NHS, are a farmer or a rural enterprise, are retired, or are in desperate need of a home, the best future for the south west will be Orange not Blue. May the best team win.

But three want him out.

One of those staying silent is Simon Jupp. Not a strong endorsement for Boris is it?

Except Radio Exe is reporting that Helen Hurford, the Conservative candidate, for the upcoming Tiverton and Honiton by-election is backing prime minister Boris Johnson, after he survived a vote of confidence by his own MPs – and says he has a new mandate to lead.

She is also reported as turning down the offer of support from disgraced Neil Parish.

So now we know that a vote for Hurley is a vote for Boris – Owl

Philip Churm, local democracy reporter www.radioexe.co.uk

Tory MPs in Devon have been reacting to Monday’s confidence vote in Boris Johnson.

Three of the nine Tory MPs in the county want the prime minister to be replaced, one, a government minister appointed by Mr Johnson, supports him, and the remaining five haven’t yet come clean.

The PM survived a bid to oust him as Conservative Party leader but 148 of his MPs voted against him; roughly 41 per cent of the parliamentary party.   

MP for Newton Abbot, Anne-Marie Morris described it as a “hollow victory.” And Tory MP for Totnes, Anthony Mangnall, suggested Mr Johnson was not a fit and proper person to be in No 10 Downing Street. 

In a statement Ms Morris said: “While the PM won the vote of no confidence, this will prove a hollow victory for him, for the party and most important for the country. 

“The country needs a leader that commands support from his party and respect across the House and the country to govern effectively. 

“This is the beginning of the end for this PM. 

“This result is worse than comparable votes of no confidence in his predecessors. This is a tragedy – a PM elected with such hope for a better future has not delivered. 

“He has been buffeted by terrible challenges – some he has met and successfully addressed and for those he should be applauded. 

“But that is not enough. Today’s challenge of the rising cost of living, as well as the post-Brexit opportunities for growth are not being met. 

“This PM may well prove me wrong – but without the trust of his MPs and of the electorate I can only see one end – and it is not a happy one.”

On Twitter, South West Devon Tory MP, Sir Gary Streeter went public shortly after he cast his vote on Monday evening. 

He said: “In February I submitted a letter of no confidence in the PM following the first Gray report. I have not changed my mind. Accordingly, I have just voted for change.

Totnes MP, Anthony Mangnall also tweeted his opposition to Boris Johnson ahead of the poll.   

“Today is not about Brexit it is only about whether or not colleagues feel the PM is the fit and proper person to be in No10,” he said.   

“Unsurprisingly, I do not believe he is and I will therefore be voting against the PM tonight.”

Torbay MP Kevin Foster who is on the government payroll as immigration minister in the Home Office, supported the prime minister. He would have been expected to resign if he had dissented in public.

Mr Foster had been expecting to spend Monday on personal business and not on politics, but the sudden announcement of the confidence vote meant he had to travel to Westminster.

In a Tweet ahead of the vote, he wrote: “People are understandably angry when seeing pictures of events which should not have happened or the idea their sacrifices were not what others were requiring of themselves. It is right apologies have followed and changes made.”

Five other Conservative MPs in Devon are mute on the matter. They are:

Sir Geoffrey Cox (Torridge & West Devon)

Simon Jupp (East Devon)

Johnny Mercer (Moor View), 

Selaine Saxby (North Devon),

Mel Stride (Central Devon).

All have been contacted but have not yet indicated how they voted in the secret ballot.  

211 Conservative MPs supported the prime minister in the confidence vote but it was fewer than he would have hoped and analysts are asking whether he will be able to stay in power until the next general election.   

Climate change-driven flooding now means the relocation of some UK coastal communities is “inevitable”, the Environment Agency has warned.

by: Sarah Wilson www.bigissue.com 

Some of the UK’s coastal communities will be forced to relocate as flooding increases in the coming years, the Environment Agency has warned.

EA chief James Bevan has said rising sea levels were now “inevitable”, with no way to recover land that will be lost to coastal erosion or swallowed by the sea as climate change accelerates. 

“Let me come now to the hardest of all inconvenient truths, which is this: in the long term, climate change means that some of our communities cannot stay where they are,” Bevan will tell a conference in Telford today. 

Take a print or digital subscription to The Big Issue and provide a critical lifeline to our work. With each subscription we invest every penny back into supporting the network of sellers across the UK. A subscription also means you’ll never miss the weekly editions of an award-winning publication, with each issue featuring the leading voices on life, culture, politics and social activism.

In a prepared speech released before the event, he will outline the actions the EA will take in the coming years to protect communities from the impacts of flooding, erosion and rising sea levels. This includes a new national assessment of flood risk and long-term investment scenarios. 

According to the EA, around 5.2 million homes in the UK are currently at risk of flooding, with thousands of homes built on flood plains every year despite the long-term risks.

If current planning outcomes continue, the EA projects that the number of homes at risk of flooding could double in the next 50 years. 

Flooding and erosion caused by rising tides along the coast is particularly challenging for local communities. It is no longer considered financially viable to protect 114 miles of UK coastline from flooding, with parts of the North Norfolk and East Yorkshire coastline worst affected.

In 2019, the village of Fairbourne in Wales became the first in the UK to be “decommissioned” due to climate change. Residents have been told they will have to leave the area by the mid-2030s when flooding is expected to submerge the village entirely. 

Neither the EA nor the government has indicated if, or when, other parts of the UK may be similarly “decommissioned”. 

The Big Issue has collaborated with Social Stories Club to create limited edition gift hampers. Packed full of treats made by social ventures, this hamper would make the perfect gift for the festive season.

Bevan said it was time to “start the conversation” about the options available to communities threatened by coastal flooding, stressing that the “communities themselves” must decide what actions to take.

“When we do eventually get to decisions on any relocation of communities, they must take full account of the views of the people who live there: no-one should be forced from their homes against their will,” he said. 

In March, the government unveiled a £36 million Coastal Transition Accelerator Programme to help threatened areas “explore innovative approaches” to adapting to coastal erosion. The initial focus areas will be the East Riding of Yorkshire and North Norfolk.

Information about the programme indicates that interventions may include moving infrastructure “[away] from the highest risk areas” as part of a “managed transition” for communities, though Bevan said it remains “far too early to say” which communities may have to undergo relocation in the long term.

Aggregate Industries have launched an appeal after plans for a 100-acre quarry in Ottery were refused in December, town councillors have been told.

Adam Manning www.sidmouthherald.co.uk

According to Cllr Jess Bailey, Devon County councillor for the Otter Valley, The ’11th-hour appeal’ was submitted on Wednesday, July 1, before the bank holiday weekend. Cllr Bailey was speaking at the Ottery St Mary Town Council meeting on Monday (June 6).

Ottery Councillors all agreed they were ‘dead against’ the proposals for any quarry in Ottery St Mary and would fight against it. 

In December last year, Devon County Council’s development management committee voted against the plan for Straitgate Farm on Exeter Road, submitted by Aggregate Industries UK Ltd. 

The scheme would have seen up to 1.5 million tonnes of sand and gravel dug up on the site over the next 10 to 12 years, before being transported 23 miles by road to Hillhead Quarry in Mid Devon for processing. 

Reasons given for the refusal by the committee included the protection of heritage assets, unacceptable impact on water supplies, unresolved road safety issues, lack of evidence of protected species, lack of surface water management plan, loss of mature trees and the impact on climate change. 

After more than two hours of debate, there were five votes for rejection and three abstentions. 

Now Aggregate Industries has launched an appeal.

Cllr Jess Bailey, Devon County Councillor for Otter Valley and District Councillor for West Hill and Aylesbeare told the Herald: “I am strongly opposed to this controversial proposal and as the County Councillor spoke at the planning committee on 1st December 2021.

“The planning committee rejected the application, which officers had recommended for approval, based on my six grounds for refusal and added a further of their own based on the distance from the quarry to the processing plant.

“Now at the eleventh hour, Aggregate Industries have submitted an appeal. There is currently only very limited information available but the appeal is to be held by way of Inquiry which is anticipated to last for 6 days.

“I intend to continue opposing this highly damaging proposal. Ottery St Mary Town Council and West Hill Parish Council have always been opposed as have Straitgate Action Group and the county councillor before me Claire Wright.”

Aggregate Industries has been approached for comment.

Cllr Roger Giles told the meeting: “The Town Council have consistently rejected proposals for a sand and gravel quarry at Straitgate Farm, which would have a considerable detrimental impact for Ottery and the surrounding areas and is very disappointed to learn that at this late date, Aggregate Industries have launched an appeal and the town council resolves to participate in the appeal to ensure it is unsuccessful.”

I’m really developing a soft spot for Dorries… Here she is, happily telling us that Tory donors are blackmailing the party to keep Johnson in power. Marina Purkiss

A professor nicknamed the “Mystic Meg of political science” after accurately predicting the result of the confidence vote in Boris Johnson has forecast the prime minister will be out within six months.

Matthew Weaver www.theguardian.com 

Prof Jon Tonge , who teaches British politics at the University of Liverpool, is kicking himself for not betting on a contest he so accurately forecast.

In a tweet posted 58 minutes before the result was announced, Tonge correctly predicted 211 MPs or 59% would back Johnson. He also predicted that 147 or 41% would rebel. This turned out to be only one out because one more MP than expected took part in the vote.

Tonge now reckons Johnson will be out within months. Speaking to the Guardian he said: “I’d be surprised that if he was still prime minister in the autumn. I would say six months, but if anyone can tough it out it is Johnson.”

He added: “This is the political escapologist of political escapologists. The difficulty he’s got is that the privileges committee won’t pull any punches in its view about whether he misled parliament. And that will probably do for him.”

Tonge has been lauded overnight for his uncanny expertise but also inundated with requests for predictions of lottery numbers, horse racing and even the outcome of Love Island.

He responded by tweeting: “Thanks for very kind comments re VONC forecast. Main items: didn’t have a bet (sobs); you really don’t want my racing tips; Love Island? Liam or Gemma. Will post lottery numbers when rollover. As sceptical other half said though, ‘first time you’ve been right since marrying me’.”

He told the Guardian: “I do quite a bit of political betting, but ironically, I didn’t bet last night because I was busy trying to work out the result. So it is slightly bittersweet.”

Tonge’s prediction was no fluke. Last month he was almost as accurate at calling the outcome of the Northern Ireland assembly vote.

He recalled: “I said Sinn Féin would get 26 seats and they got 27. I said the DUP would get 24 seats and they got 25.” In 2017 assembly election he was also only one seat out and pointed out that Northern Ireland election is much harder to predict because of the single transferrable voting system.

He said: “Last night was more much more straightforward a contest but I do wish I’d had a bet.”

Tonge said he initially expected Johnson to match the performance of his predecessor. He said: “At the start of the day, I was thinking the result would be virtually the same as the no confidence vote in Theresa May. But during the day, it became clear that the level of opposition was going to be greater. I did wonder how low to go. I hovered around 58%/42% but in then end went for 59%/41%.

He added: “It was educated guesswork based upon the 2019 intake and basic loyalty versus declared pledges against him. You’ve got Covid lockdown sceptics who turned against him, hardcore remainers who never never liked him. But the rest were quite difficult because there’s no great great ideological rupture here.”

Tonge admits to a feeling of professional pride in his prediction.

“It gives you a nice warm feeling,” he said. But he is also annoyed that underestimated the size of the rebellion by one MP. “I am irritated because it would have been nice to have got it spot on,” he said.

However, Tonge’s was not the only correct prediction. In Westminster, as the Tory minister Greg Hands pointed out on Monday night after the vote, the Parliament Square bus stop called it just right.

“I don’t think I’d recognise the new candidate, Helen thingy, if she walked past me. She’s made no effort with the [Conservative] Club. We’ve had no leaflets or posters delivered and as far as I can see the party is doing its best to hide her from the voters because its scared of what she might actually say.”

(She’s the one next to Alison Hernandez – Owl)

By David Parsley inews.co.uk

Conservative voters in Tiverton and Honiton are torn on whether Boris Johnson is an electoral asset or liability ahead of the by-election on 23 June.

The resignation of Conservative MP Neil Parish after he was caught watching pornography on his phone in the House of Commons has thrown this sleepy Devon constituency into the national spotlight.

Parish left behind a 24,000 majority, and despite coming in third at the 2019 General Election the Liberal Democrats are hopeful of pulling off their third big mid-term by-election swing in a year.

Nick Sleeman, bar manager at the Honiton Conservative Club, has had enough of the Prime Minister’s antics and will be voting Liberal Democrat in a little of two weeks’ time.

“I’m definitely voting Lib Dem because I’ve had enough of Boris’ lies,” said Mr Sleeman. “He should go.”

However, even if Mr Johnson is forced out of office Mr Sleeman has another reason not to vote Conservative for the first time he can remember. He’s not a fan of the local Tory candidate Helen Hurford, the town’s current deputy mayor and owner of a beauty salon just in Honiton.

“I don’t think I’d recognise the new candidate, Helen thingy, if she walked past me. She’s made no effort with the [Conservative] Club. We’ve had no leaflets or posters delivered and as far as I can see the party is doing its best to hide her from the voters because its scared of what she might actually say.”

He is just one of many lifelong Tory voters in the town who are switching their allegiance to the Liberal Democrats this time around.

Gerry Mills is secretary of the club, and like his colleague Mr Sleeman, is disillusioned with the lack of profile of his Conservative candidate.

“I’m the secretary of the Honiton Conservative Club, and I’m probably not going to vote for our candidate at the by-election. I doubt I’ll vote Lib Dem either, and I’ll probably just stay at home.

Another lifelong Tory voter Carole Corfield is more definitive on the position of Mr Johnson. She will only vote Conservative at the by-election if he is no longer in power.

“I voted for Boris in 2019 to get Brexit done,” said Mrs Corfield. “But he’s lied to us all so much now that I can’t vote for him.

“I’ll go Lib Dem this time unless Boris has gone. I think I’d vote Conservative if there was pretty much any other leader than him there, but I won’t while he’s still in power.”

In contrast to the low key Conservative campaign in Tiverton and Honiton the Liberal Democrats have a big presence in the constituency as the party attempts to overturn the 24,000 Tory majority (Photo: David Parsley)

While the view among Honiton Tories looks bad for Mr Johnson, the view among Tory voters in Tiverton appears more positive.

In the Tiverton Constitutional Club Philip Gibbs does not believe there is a better Tory MP to occupy No 10 Downing Street.

“He’s the best man for the job,” he said. “I can’t think of anyone who could replace him.”

Fellow Tory voter Henry Middleton added “we should keep him because he’s fun,” a sentiment shared by his friend George Williams.

Outside the Constitutional Club there is a whiff of rebellion among the Conservative voters of Tiverton.

Barry Tretherway will be switching his vote to the Lib Dems later this month.

“How can we trust Boris anymore after all the lies,” he said. “Plus, we have a candidate I know nothing about because we’ve never heard her speak.”

A haunted-looking Boris Johnson stares out from the front pages of many of the papers after a dramatic night of Conservative party bloodletting at Westminster.

Martin Farrer www.theguardian.com 

The prime minister is shown being driven back from the Commons to Downing Street after he won a Tory no-confidence vote in his leadership by 211 to 148.

Although he called the victory decisive and vowed to “bash on” in government, the reaction of some Tory-supporting newspapers suggests he will not be able to draw a line under his Partygate woes any time soon.

“A wounded victor”, says the Times, alongside the picture of Johnson that seems eerily similar to the famous one of Margaret Thatcher being driven away from Downing Street after she was ousted in a Tory party coup.

The paper adds that it was a worse than expected result for Johnson and throws up another parallel with Thatcher by noting that the same proportion of MPs voted against her as against her current scandal-plagued successor. She resigned two days later.

The Daily Telegraph’s front page headline says “Hollow victory tears Tories apart” and carries a secondary headline saying Johnson’s authority has been “crushed” as rebels circle to finish him off.

 Photograph: The Daily Telegraph

The paper’s columnists line up to give a damning verdict on Johnson’s prospects for leading the party into the future with Tim Stanley declaring simply: “The PM is toast.”

The Financial Times also suggests that the prime minister is badly damaged by the vote with its lead headline saying “Johnson wounded in confidence vote as 41% of Tory MPs rebel”.

The Mirror proclaims “Party’s over, Boris” and says that the prime minister has suffered a “brutal attack” by his own side “and is warned that he will be out in a year”.

The Guardian’s splash says “PM clinging to power after vote humiliation”, with columnist Martin Kettle writing: “He is irreparably damaged. Politicians don’t recover from such things.”

The i’s front page says “Wounded Johnson in peril” and inside its political editor, Paul Waugh, says Johnson is the “sick man of Downing Street, infecting all those around him”.

The Metro also thinks it’s time for Johnson to go: “The party is over Boris”.

Tomorrow’s Paper Today 📰

THE PARTY IS OVER BORIS 🎉

🔴He survives confidence ballot…but blow as 41% say it’s time for him to go

🔴 Fears he is left a lame-duck premier like predecessor may ahead of crucial by-elections pic.twitter.com/7fYT62cZOJ

— Metro (@MetroUK) June 6, 2022

However, the prime minister still has some defiant backing from his cheerleaders in the national papers. Reflecting the concern of some Tories that dumping Johnson is electoral suicide, the Mail has mocked up a red button marked “Lib Dems Labour SNP” and says “MPs hit the self-destruct button by opening door to smirking Starmer’s coalition of chaos”. Underneath, its main headline says “Boris vows: I’ll bash on”.

 Photograph: Mail

The Express also tries to strike an upbeat note with a headline which reads: “Defiant and unbowed … Boris: I’ll lead party to victory”.

The Sun’s splash is “Night of the blond knives”, saying that Johnson has been “stabbed in the back by 148 MPs”.

Tomorrow’s front page: New photo of Lilibet celebrating her first birthday released by Harry and Meghan // Boris Johnson narrowly survives a confidence vote as 148 Tory rebels stabbed him in the back pic.twitter.com/sUnTO3b7zE

— The Sun (@TheSun) June 6, 2022

In Scotland the Herald says “Wounded and weakened, but Johnson vows to stay in office”, while the Press and Journal says “Boris body blow despite winning confidence vote”.

 Photograph: The Herald

The Record opts to throw Johnson’s election-winning slogan back at him with its front page headline: “Get Borexit done”

The Northern Echo says “Carry on Boris (for now)“, while the Newcastle Journal asks “Is he on his way out?”.

From a Correspondent:

Dear Owl,

I thought the attached would look good gracing lamp posts in the forthcoming by-elections.

Regards.

“Over-investment in domestic property and under-investment in almost everything else”

Larry Elliot, writing in the Guardian, reviews our economic ups and downs throughout the Queen’s 70 year reign. His concluding paragraphs are worth reading. 

70 years on and UK is still mistakenly looking for economic miracle cure 

Larry Elliott www.theguardian.com 

Getting the big picture right – setting interest rates at the right level and having a competitive pound – clearly matters but so does getting the small stuff right. Over the years, too little attention has been paid to the supply side of the economy, in part because the long lead times for policies to work sit uneasily with the demands of the electoral cycle for instant results.

The message from other – more successful – economies is clear and has been clear for the past 70 years. Identify the structural weaknesses of the economy, which in Britain’s case includes over-investment in domestic property and under-investment in almost everything else. Put in place the right policies to remedy the problems. Then stay the course.