Predicted overspend in Devon drops by more than £4m

Savings in some areas help improve budget outlook.

Devon County Council’s predicted budget overspend has dropped by more than £4 million in two months.

Bradley Gerrard www.radioexe.co.uk 

The council, which has been cutting costs, now expects its overspend at the end of the financial year to be £291,000 – a steep drop from the £4.5 million it was predicting just a matter of weeks ago.

It is because some parts of the council have tightening their purse strings, although adult social care and children’s services respectively are expected to spend £2.9 million and £8.4 million more than budgeted.

Savings elsewhere include the climate change, environment and transport division (£2 million) and corporate services (£1.4 million), to help balance the books.

However, the reduced figure does not include the council’s ballooning special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) deficit, now forecast to hit £42 million for the 2023/24 financial year alone, an increase of £2.5 million in recent months.

The government allows this to be kept outside the main budget until at least 2026.

Devon’s cumulative SEND deficit is expected to be around £160 million by April.

Finance director Angie Sinclair said the main budget had “improved significantly” between November and January. Any overspend will have to be met from reserves, of which it has £121 million, with £105 million earmarked for specific purposes and £16 million for emergencies.

“Financial risks within adult social care and children and young people are still being experienced but the work underway across the authority to support these pressures continues to ensure the whole organisation is focused on achieving a break-even position for the end of the year,” Ms Sinclair said.

“The position has improved significantly since month 8 (November), with the forecast overspend reducing from £4.5 million to nearly breakeven, and demonstrates strong financial management.”

This budget forecast will be presented to Devon’s cabinet this week (Wednesday 13 March), and comes as the authority is awaiting news on its application to the government’s Safety Valve scheme, which provides grants to councils with ballooning special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) deficits.

Devon is hoping for a significant sum to help it reduce its SEND deficit – expected to be in the tens of millions of pounds – and if successful, it is likely to have to find ways of spending money more efficiently in its education budget.

More on Storm Overflow Plan – Exmouth the details

Following an earlier post, Owl has been asked to show the “popup” details of the plans, baseline and recent performance data for each storm overflow in Exmouth for comparison.

These “popups” are a bit elusive and disappear with only a slight move of the cursor.

The combined sewer outfalls associated with treatment works are also elusive, disappearing, for example, when “East Devon” is selected as the area of interest within the South West Water catchment. 

The title of the interactive map is the National Storm Overflow Plan and seems to exclude all emergency overflows associated with sewage pumping stations such as at Phear Park.

Exmouth sewage treatment works CSO – all targets by 2027

Maer pumping station and tank CSO – all targets by 2025

Maer Road CSO, all targets already met

Imperial Road tank CSO – all targets by 2030

Hartopp Road CSO – all targets by 2030

Exeter Road CSO – all targets by 2030

Ash Grove CSO – all targets by 2030

In many cases the estimated number of spills remaining after 2050 is a consistent “8”. How big an improvement this represents in these cases depends on the “calculation” of the baseline figure. In some cases it represents only a 50% reduction.

Base Map for the Exe and local bathing beaches

Exmouth sewage treatment works CSO

Maer pumping station and tank CSO

Maer Road CSO

Imperial Road tank CSO

Hartopp Road CSO

Exeter Road CSO

Ash Grove CSO

Planning applications validated by EDDC for the week beginning 26 February

Plans to upgrade coastal defences at Seaton one step closer

Plans are developing for a coastal protection scheme in Seaton that will better protect 41 homes, businesses, and the town’s coastline from erosion. 

Adam Manning www.midweekherald.co.uk

Construction is planned to begin in 2025. The scheme will involve improving a 400-metre length of existing rock armour along the foot of the cliffs at Seaton Hole beach, and repairing the existing Check House seawall.

Councillor Geoff Jung, EDDC’s portfolio holder for coast, country, and environment, said: “Like all other communities on the coast, Seaton is becoming more and more susceptible to coastal change due to our changing climate. More storms, higher rainfall, are clearly having a serious effect on our beaches and cliffs.”

“We are continually reviewing with other stakeholders such as the Environment Agency and the Town Council regarding the whole seafront. This section from Seaton Hole beach to the Check House is critical to protect a number of properties and we hope to start on this section next year.”

More than £500,000 in grant funding has been secured from the Environment Agency, with East Devon District Council (EDDC) allocating £250,000 towards the project. Additional funds from Devon County Council and Seaton Town Council have also been provided to support the scheme.

Local coastal defence specialists will be invited to tender for the works this spring, with the aim to start construction in summer 2025.

Come clean on secret taxpayer rescue plans for Thames Water, MP demands

Ministers must come clean on the secret details of an emergency plan for a taxpayer bailout in the event of Thames Water collapsing, a Liberal Democrat MP has said.

Those of us in the regions could end up paying twice for water, once for ours, and again for London”s water. Is this levelling up? – Owl

Sandra Laville www.theguardian.com

Sarah Olney will press in parliament this week for details of a behind-the-scenes rescue operation being drawn up for the biggest privatised water company in England. Olney said keeping the details of the contingency plan secret amounted to a cover-up.

The MP has secured a parliamentary debate this Friday, as intensive discussions are under way between ministers and the regulator Ofwat on the emergency rescue plan in case of the collapse of the ailing privatised water company, which provides water and waste services to 15 million people.

Olney wants details of the contingency plans, which are codenamed Operation Timber and being run by Tamara Finkelstein, the permanent secretary at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, to be made public.

“This Conservative government’s refusal to make their contingency plan in the event of Thames Water’s collapse, public, is nothing short of a cover-up,” Olney said. “It is very clear they could easily slip into special administration. The public has a right to know what ministers plan to do.”

Thames Water, which has debts of more than £18bn, is trying to stay solvent and avoid a takeover by seeking an additional £2.5bn bailout from its shareholders for the second half of the decade.

But the company wants concessions from Ofwat to encourage shareholders to commit to the bailout. These include being allowed to pay higher dividends, while increasing bills by 40%, and limitations on fines for serious pollution of rivers.

In a sign its collapse could be looming, ministers recently updated 30-year-old water insolvency legislation, which can be triggered if a water company cannot pay its debts.

Emma Hardy, the Labour MP for Kingston upon Hull and Hessle, said the move reflected “the desperate and perilous situation that the sector had reached, with many companies on the precipice”.

The upgraded insolvency legislation is aimed at ensuring that drinking water and wastewater services for 15 million people are maintained if Thames became insolvent.

Special administrators can be appointed to a water company by the secretary of state or the regulator.

The company, along with five other water firms, is at the centre of an Ofwat investigation into the potentially illegal discharging of sewage from its treatment plants.

Water companies on Tuesday announced details of plans to remove 150,000 annual sewage spills by 2030, making nearly 9,000 storm overflow improvements in a £10bn investment over five years. They are seeking Ofwat approval to raise customer bills to pay for this.

Olney said: “For too long water companies have been allowed to get away with pumping raw sewage into our waterways while Conservative ministers have turned a blind eye. It is time they cracked down on these polluting giants and put an end to this disgusting practice.”

The MP said it was important for the government to be open about any discussions of a taxpayer bailout for Thames at a time when the water industry was under scrutiny. Companies including South East water, Southern Water and SES water are, like Thames Water, listed in Ofwat’s most recent highest category regarding concerns over their financial resilience and ability to operate.

The industry is opposed to putting Thames into special administration, fearing it will affect other struggling water companies by reducing investor confidence.

Olney said it was vital to exert public scrutiny over the emergency plans for Thames and taxpayer liabilities because of the potential for other companies to go under.

A government spokesperson said: “Water companies are commercial entities and we do not comment on the financial situation of specific companies as it would not be appropriate. We prepare for a range of scenarios across our regulated industries – including water – as any responsible government would.”

Thames Water declined to comment.

Water firms map out plan to cut 150k spills

Water companies have claimed they will cut sewage spills by 150,000 a year by the end of the decade, as they laid out a plan for tackling river pollution.

An online map published today shows where improvements will be made to curb spills in waterways, down to the level of individual storm overflow pipes. It will include new storm tanks to stop sewers being overwhelmed. [From the Times]

However, the map accompanying the National Storm Overflow Plan for England, ordered by the government, reveals that roughly 5,000 of about 14,000 overflows will not receive improvements by 2050. Water sector figures fear that risks a backlash from the public in areas that will miss out.

It also appears to fall short of a demand by the former environment secretary, Thérèse Coffey, 13 months ago who said all water companies must deliver “a clear plan for what they are doing on every storm overflow”.

[Owl -The interactive map is complicated and won’t win any prizes for using “plain English” but it does contain a lot of information. Here, by way of illustration are three screen shots. The first gives an overview of East Devon including the catchment areas of the Exe, Otter and Axe. This shows that the spills into our rivers will be the last to be cleaned up.

The second zooms in on our coast.

The third illustrates the history and projection of spills available for each outlet, in this case the Imperial Road CSO in Exmouth. From a baseline of 14 spills a year now, SWW estimate they won’t even halve that number by 2050! So you really need to read the “small print”.]

Update: see more details in this second post.

Back to the Times article…..

Adam Vaughan Environment Editor, The Times print edition 12 March.

The plan comes at a sensitive time for the water industry. Companies are braced for official figures this month that are expected to show a huge increase in sewage spills. That is because last year was wetter than normal, 2022 was drier than usual and the number of pipes being monitored rose to 100 per cent by last December.

The industry body Water UK said that it expected its new plan to cut 150,000 sewage spills by 2030, a 40 per cent reduction compared with the 372,000 that were recorded in 2020. The government’s plan had envisaged a cut of 64,000 sewage spills by 2030.

New infrastructure, which can vary from storm tanks to wetlands and “sustainable urban drainage systems” to slow the flow of rainwater into sewers, will be focused first on bathing waters and ecologically important waters including sites of special scientific interest. Great Britain’s longest river, the Severn, is set to have a 77 percent reduction in sewage spills.

Water companies are expected to spend in the region of £60 billion between now and 2050 to end the scourge of raw sewage being dumped when it rains, due to the way rainwater and sewage are collected in the same pipes.

The investment between 2025 and 2030 is expected to push up the average house-

hold water bill by about £13 a year. However, the amount will vary widely around the country. United Utilities, which covers northwest England, is expected to account for £3.1 billion of the water sector’s £10.2 billion slated for cutting spills between 2025 and 2030. On the flipside, it is expected to have the biggest reduction in spills, with the new map suggesting about 58,000 fewer spills by 2030. The Times Clean it Up campaign has

been urging regulators and politicians to sign off on new investment plans totalling £96 billion by 2030, with tariffs to protect the most vulnerable in society. A decision is expected by Ofwat this summer.

Water UK said the government could deliver on ten of its past commitments to help speed up the elimination of sewage spills. The list of ideas includes a 14-month-old promise to mandate ponds and other green drainage systems in new-build housing developments in England, and banning the sale of plastic wet wipes. The government said it was committed to banning wet wipes.

“The ban on wet wipes has now been announced in 2018, 2021 and then last April and yet they are still being sold by the millions, and are still clogging up our sewage system and polluting our rivers with microplastics,” Charles Watson, chairman of the campaign group River Action, said.

The water minister Robbie Moore said: “As part of our drive to improve transparency, we demanded these storm overflow action plans were created by industry and we will now closely scrutinise them to ensure significant action is taken to reduce harmful and unnecessary discharges.”

Simon Jupp’s so short of political ideas he’s stealing Richard Foord’s clothes again!

[And did Alison Hernandez get a ticking off?]

Once again Simon Jupp is claiming conservative credit for the “triple lock” in his latest facebook “Weekly roundup”.

As Owl explained in the middle of January, from a speech given by Richard Foord in parliament:

The Conservative 2010 manifesto talked about restoring the link between the basic state pension and average earnings”,

Whereas it was the 2010 Liberal Democrat manifesto that stated:

“We will uprate the state pension annually by whichever is the higher of growth in earnings, growth in prices or 2.5 per cent.”

In the same “Weekly roundup” Simon said:

“It was great to welcome Home Secretary James Cleverly to Sidmouth last weekend to talk to residents with Police & Crime Commissioner, Alison Hernandez. We have record police officer numbers in Devon & Cornwall & Honiton’s police station has recently reopened to the public, with more to come.

But Simon again forgot to mention that:

Honiton is in Richard Foord’s constituency – those of us actually living in “Juppland”, for example  Sidmouth and Exmouth have yet to see a police office reopen, and in Budleigh even see a police officer, except on training days!

A year ago Owl reported that about a third of the new “Bozzer” recruits (Boris Johnson’s promise to add 20,000 to the force) Alison Hernandez boasted about getting in 2019 (and we are paying for) had voted with their feet and had left. We are also paying through the nose for these recruits as Hernandez bangs up her take of the Council Tax once again by a “necessary” 4.95 per cent. Since coming into office in 2016 she has pushed her take of the average council tax by over £100.    Remember she spends 70% more of your Council Tax as EDDC does. (Council Tax is split: 73% DCC; 12% Police; 7% EDDC; 4% Fire; 4% Towns & Parishes).

Finally, did the Home Secretary take her aside for a little chat about her force not only being in “special measures” but rated poorly for failings in “Strategic Planning” and “Value for Money”? From the photos, perhaps he did.

Owl is wondering whether to start a “ministerial visit ” count as an indicator of how insecure the party feels the East Devon parliamentary seats are?

They are also kept pretty “hush hush” for some reason.

SWW charm offensive continues with more “Paid Content” in Exmouth Journal

If only they had shown such candour when facing EDDC’s scrutiny committee, but then they faced questioning. This way they are on transmit only. – Owl

John Halsall: ‘We are making good progress in Exmouth’

John Halsall, Chief Operating Officer, South West Water www.exmouthjournal.co.uk 

Following the operational issues we’ve faced in Exmouth over the last few months, I promised I’d keep you updated as we work to fix the problem, and I’d like to do that again now.

Firstly, I’d like to reiterate how sorry I am for the disruption we’ve caused in Exmouth. I’m pleased to say we are making great progress with our replacement of the section of sewer that runs from Plumb Park housing estate to Maer Lane, just outside the sewage treatment works.

In order to lay this sewer, the wastewater which normally flows through the pipe is being diverted around the new section by roughly 1.5km of temporary overland pipe. Once the new section of sewer is complete and connected to the network, we’ll begin work to remove the temporary pipe and reinstate the fields we are working in.

The new section of pipe will meet the existing sewer on Maer Lane, near Maer Lane Sewage Treatment Works. To make sure this whole area is as resilient to future bursts as possible, we’re also looking to upgrade the small section of sewer from Maer Lane which runs into the treatment works.

It won’t have escaped your attention that we’ve just had the wettest February ever in the South West, with more than twice the average rainfall. This has proved to be incredibly challenging for our teams on the ground in Exmouth and has led to some delays due to the poor ground conditions. While there is a risk we will not be able to fully complete our work by the end of March as originally expected, we’re still working as hard as we can to do so.

I’d like to thank you again for your patience and thank our teams on the ground for doing a great job under really difficult conditions. I’ll continue to provide regular updates as we work to provide better resilience for Exmouth.

Gordon Brown: UK has to get on war footing for economic growth

Britain needs to be put on an economic “war footing” if it is to break out of a vicious cycle of low growth, the former prime minister Gordon Brown will say [did say] on Monday.

Larry Elliott www.theguardian.com 

In a speech to the Institute for Government thinktank, he will call for the creation of a National Economic Council, jointly chaired by the prime minister and chancellor with a mission to deliver annual growth of 3%.

The former prime minister will say the Treasury must be fully committed to a growth strategy and not be allowed to retreat into a “comfort zone” in which it concentrates on balancing the books and reducing the national debt.

Jeremy Hunt, the chancellor, said in his budget last week that the economy would soon turn the corner after the damage caused by the pandemic and the cost of living crisis.

But the Office for Budget Responsibility, the government’s spending watchdog, said the outlook for the economy “remained challenging” and Brown, prime minister during the 2008 global financial crisis, will say that the way Britain is governed needs to change if there is to be an end to 15 years of stagnation.

He will say: “The way we govern will have to be radically transformed – and government put on a war footing – if Britain is to break free from the vicious low growth, low productivity, and low wage cycle that has seen annual growth halve in the last decade, investment levels stagnate at levels far below our main competitors, the worst productivity performance – less than 0.5% a year – since the Industrial Revolution, and the deepest regional economic inequalities in western Europe.”

Labour’s last prime minister will propose his new National Economic Council should be jointly staffed by the Treasury and the Cabinet Office, working alongside a council of the nations and regions, and have the task of hitting a 3% growth target. Brown will say the economic council should have equal status with the government’s national security council, meeting at least once a week, and twice a week if necessary.

Brown will argue that higher growth can be achieved through an industrial strategy founded on green, digital and medical technologies, linked to an employment and anti-poverty strategy focused on better jobs, skills, and services.

Brown will say the lesson he learned in his time as chancellor and prime minister is that the Treasury needs to be at the centre of a growth strategy rather than seeing its powers hived off to a new economic department.

“A myriad of improvisations have been tried and failed to turbocharge British economic growth, from the ill-fated Department of Economic Affairs of the 1960s, the National Enterprise Board of the 1970s, and Mrs Thatcher’s anointing of Sir Alan Walters in opposition to Chancellor Nigel Lawson in the 1980s,” he will say.

“But for a growth strategy to work, the Treasury has to be at the centre of a coordinated framework of economic policymaking and implementation led by it and No 10 and which involves all relevant economic departments.”

Rachel Reeves, the shadow chancellor, has said achieving higher growth will be at the heart of a future Labour government’s economic strategy and has insisted this has to be built on sound public finances.

Brown will say that for his plan to work, the Treasury “has to avoid the temptation to retreat into its comfort zone”, namely as “a finance department with an almost exclusive focus on debt and deficit reduction – neglecting its wider responsibilities for delivering growth”.

Brown helped to orchestrate the rescue of the UK’s stricken banks in 2008 but the deep recession that accompanied the global financial crisis resulted in him losing the 2010 general election.

In his speech on Monday, he will argue that the subsequent shift to austerity under the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition helped explain the UK’s weak economic performance while the US instead focused on a focus to growth.

South West Water investing millions to tackle sewage spills

Remember SSW claim that they are investing £38m in Exmouth and Sandy bay to reduce pollution.

A year ago water minister Rebecca Pow confirmed £70 million of cash to improving sewage systems in Sidmouth, Tipton St John and Axminister, as well as Falmouth in Cornwall.

Now the figure for the whole region is £32m by 2025. How much of this is re-announcement?

And can you realistically “turn the taps” on that fast? – Owl

REBECCA SPEARE-COLE www.devonlive.com

Water companies will invest more than £180 million to tackle sewage spills – with South West Water investing £32 million, the Government has announced. The fast-tracked investment made by several water companies in England will support the effort to roll out storm overflow prevention measures by April 2025.

These include artificial intelligence systems, accelerated wetland programmes, installing new in-sewer monitors and recruiting and training specialist staff. The Government said it expects the measures to prevent more than 8,000 spills polluting English waterways.

Anglian will invest £50 million, Severn Trent will invest £41 mill­ion, Southern will invest £10 million, South West will invest £32 million, United Utilities will invest £39 million and Wessex will invest £8 million. Companies such as Northumbrian and Yorkshire Water have not announced new fast-tracked investment, having already announced plans to take forward additional investment to tackle storm overflows this year, the Government said.

Environment Secretary Steve Barclay said the investment is part of Government efforts to “push for better performance from water companies and hold them to account”. He said: “The amount of sewage being spilled into our rivers is completely unacceptable and the public rightly expects action.

“This money will mean more cutting-edge technology, including artificial intelligence, and more specialist staff to detect and reduce spills. Today’s announcement builds on significant work by this Government to protect and strengthen our waters with increased investment, stronger regulation and tougher enforcement action.”

The support comes after Mr Barclay directed water companies in December to accelerate plans and increase funding in order to measurably reduce sewage spills over the next 12 months. The investment will add to the water companies’ previous £3.1 billion investment for the period of 2020 to 2025.

It is the latest move to tackle concerns over levels of pollution being dumped into rivers, lakes and around the coasts from sources including overflow pipes and processing plants, causing harm to wildlife and the health of beachgoers as well as affecting tourism and leisure industries.

The Government recently announced plans to block bonuses for water company executives where firms have committed serious criminal breaches, subject to Ofwat consultation, as well as to quadruple inspections on water companies in the next year.

Giles Bristow, chief executive of Surfers Against Sewage, said: “It’s great to see the Government fast-tracking investment on the decades-old issue of sewage pollution. The informed and angry voices of constituents across the UK are clearly making those in power listen and take visible actions to address the sewage scandal.

“Despite today’s welcome announcement, questions still remain on the scale and scope of the Government’s ambitions for our rivers and seas. We’ll be watching closely to ensure that it’s the polluters, not the consumer, that pays to clean up this mess.”

Capacity crunch on National Grid is delaying new homes in UK by years

Housing projects are being delayed for years because of an “infra­structure crisis” caused by lack of capacity in the National Grid, council leaders have warned.

Those hoping to build new wind turbines, solar farms or micro-hydroelectric schemes face even longer waits.

The delays come after Ofgem had already taken action last year to remove so-called “zombie” projects – those that had been approved but had stopped being developed – from the connections queue.

Chaos – Owl

James Tapper www.theguardian.com 

Building schemes for thousands of homes are on hold, while new ­projects face delays of up to four years in some parts of the UK because of a ­lengthening queue of developers waiting to be connected.

Those hoping to build new wind turbines, solar farms or micro-hydroelectric schemes face even longer waits after a deluge of new connection requests, many of them from speculative schemes.

Ministers have asked the National Infrastructure Commission (NIC) to investigate, but senior members of the District Councils’ Network (DCN), part of the Local Government Association, say the delays are slowing down the UK economy. Bridget Smith, the DCN’s vice-chair and leader of South Cambridgeshire district council, said: “Nationally, we’ve got an absolute ­crisis in all infrastructure.”

Plans by Michael Gove, the housing secretary, to build 150,000 homes in Cambridge to create a British Silicon Valley were already being hampered by lack of water, she said. “And where’s the power coming from? Something fundamental has to change.”

Susan Brown, the leader of Oxford city council, who is also a DCN vice-chair, said that 90 new homes in the Littlemore district had been meant to have heat pumps. “The National Grid basically said ‘we won’t have enough power to connect them’ so half the houses are going to have to have gas boilers instead – it’s so frustrating.”

Brown, who is also chair of the Future Oxfordshire Partnership, said plans to expand the town of Bicester with 7,000 new homes and a commercial zone had ground to a halt.

“All of that has been paused, awaiting grid reinforcement,” she said.

Under the current first-come, first-served system, developers can pay to jump up the queue, but the Bicester project has a further twist of red tape because there are two developers – one for the housing and another for the commercial buildings.

“Competition rules mean they’re not allowed to broker a solution together,” Brown said. “That’s particularly mad because it means they are dancing around, hoping the other one is going to take the full cost of providing grid reinforcement. There are so many daft things in our system.”

Brown said that leaders in other areas such as Milton Keynes, Swindon, Cambridge and Peterborough – with whom she works as part of the Fast Growth Cities group – were ­reporting similar problems. “It’s really beginning to constrain our ability to grow our local economy, which is significant for UK plc because the Oxford-Cambridge wider area is a significant net contributor to GDP, and not many bits of the country are.

“It’s possible that we’re a little bit ahead of the curve across the ­country. If they’re not already experiencing [these problems], people elsewhere will be experiencing them very soon.”

Although demand for electricity from builders is not being met, plans to expand the electricity supply are also causing problems, as the National Grid has been swamped with applications to build solar and wind farms – far more than the country would ever need.

Two weeks ago, the National Grid’s electricity systems operator (ESO), which manages power distribution, said that the connections queue had “grown at unprecedented pace”.

Great Britain’s power stations together generate 75 gigawatts of electricity, and the mainland is expected to need about twice as much by 2050 as people switch to ­electric vehicles and heat pumps.

But in January alone, developers submitted projects that would add 49GW, and the ESO said the queue could reach the equivalent of 800GW by the end of the year – more than four times as much as the country would ever need.

Being swamped with applications has made delays even longer, and Ofgem has had to approve a three-month delay until developers even find out when they can get connected. David Wildash, the ESO’s interim director of engineering, said in a blogpost that “we recognise that the outcome of this process is not what was envisaged at the outset. The outcome will be hugely disappointing to our customers.”

The delays come after Ofgem had already taken action last year to remove so-called “zombie” projects – those that had been approved but had stopped being developed – from the connections queue.

Nick Winser at the National Infrastructure Commission, who last year issued a report recommending that homeowners should be given generous compensation for agreeing to have power lines built close to their homes, is examining ways to solve the electricity capacity problem. He said: “We can’t let the distribution network become a barrier to the transition away from fossil fuels, which is why the commission is looking at what further investment or policy changes are needed to ensure the whole network is ready for 2050 and beyond.”

A government spokesperson said: “We’re driving forward the biggest reforms to our electricity grid since the 1950s – halving the time it takes to build networks, speeding up grid connections, supporting thousands of jobs and reducing bills in the long-term for families.

“Meanwhile we are on track to build one million homes this parliament and have laid out an ambitious long-term plan for housing that includes speeding up the planning system, cutting bureaucracy, and reducing delays to ensure we deliver the homes that communities want and need.”

Pollution – now Sidmouth gets National coverage

Devon beauty spot suffers sewage outflow for over 12 hours

“A Devon beauty spot where Queen Victoria spent time as a child has seen raw sewage discharged for more than 12 hours.”

But Geoff Crawford has left this comment on the Sidmouth Community facebook page:

Feb and March so far has seen over 533 hours of sewage overflow at Sidmouth. That’s equivalent over 22 days continuous none stop overflow. That’s a bit excessive really. I mean that’s continuous overflow of sewage for 22 of the past 32 days. I can’t understand why the people of Sidmouth seem pretty passive about that.

Connie Dimsdale inews.co.uk

The seaside town of Sidmouth on the Jurassic Coast has seen raw sewage discharged from 7.38pm on Saturday 9 March, according to Surfers Against Sewage.

Queen Victoria visited the town as a baby during the winter of 1819 and 1820 when Sidmouth was a popular holiday destination, according to the biography Queen Victoria: Her Life and Legacy by Paul Kendall.

The town was a popular holiday destination in the Georgian and Victorian times and still attracts tourists today with an impressive coastline and beautiful countryside.

Now the town has been blighted by a sewage flow, which South West Water said was due to “heavy, localised rainfall” in the area in recent days.

Water companies are permitted to use “storm overflows” to discharge waste during periods of intense rainfall to prevent their infrastructure from becoming overwhelmed and sewage backing up into people’s homes.

The company said reducing the use of storm overflows is a “priority” and has invested in areas including Sidmouth.

Surfers Against Sewage has also warned of pollution along the Devon coast at the nearby coastal towns and villages of Sandy Bay, Budleigh Salterton, Seaton, and Beer.

It comes after i revealed that a sea swimmer from Exmouth, Devon, is taking South West Water to court over sea sewage discharges that she claims have harmed her health and prevented her from taking daily swims.

Retired NHS physiotherapist Jo Bateman has submitted an action to the Small Claims Court alleging that illegal sewage spills into the sea at her local beach have affected both her physical and mental wellbeing.

In her claim, Ms Bateman details 54 instances when she believes South West Water illegally dumped sewage into the sea during 2023.

Water companies have come under intense scrutiny over the last year for the amount of raw sewage that is being discharged into Britain’s rivers, lakes and coastal waters.

A spokesperson from South West Water said: “Due to the heavy, localised rainfall in the area over recent days, there has been storm overflow activity in Sidmouth.

“Storm overflows are pressure relief valves built into our network that stop homes and businesses from flooding during periods of heavy rainfall.

“However, reducing their use is a priority for us and we are investing record levels to do this – including in Sidmouth, where water quality is rated as excellent by the Environment Agency.”

Do the Environment Agency sample the water on Budleigh beach where bathers actually swim?

ONE of Budleigh’s two main swimming areas is sandwiched between frequently polluting channels. The other area MAY be much cleaner. But contrary to explicit legislation, Budleigh’s water sampling reports on neither.

Petercrwilliams fightingpoolution.com 

Beach water sampling is precisely regulated by the ‘2013 Bathing Water Directive’. This legislation clearly sets out the exact methodology that must be followed to provide a valid statement of the bathing water quality for all beaches.

One of the key instructions (not surprisingly), is how the sampling location must be selected at each beach. Here’s what the law says:

So it’s clear, the Environment Agency “must locate the point where most bathers are expected”.

So where on Budleigh beach do you think they sample?

  • Maybe immediately below the Lime Kiln car park, where most Summer visitors park and head to the beach?
  • Or alternatively, maybe Steamer Steps end – where most local swim, and is popular all year round?

In fact, the EA sample a section of the beach where very few people swim! They sample the water quality just by our iconic telephone box, west of the Longboat Café.

So the key question: does this make a difference to people’s swimming safety – and would you change your behaviour if you knew the facts?

The key purpose of water sampling, analysis and forecasting is to provide information that we can act on. Is it a good place to swim generally, and is it good to swim today?

Sampling the Telephone box location provides little useful information for any water user at Lime Kiln or Steamer Steps.

To understand why, we need to take a look at the ‘Sewage Map of Budleigh’.

You can see the Blue Sampling location flag in the middle of the map – where the water is sampled.

You can also see all of the sewage overflow points and outfalls (colour coded from RED = highest polluting outlet, to Green = lower polluting). Prevailing currents are marked with the black arrows.

The Lime Kiln car park and swim area is just a few metres ‘downstream’ from the Kersbrook outfall, which enters the beach below the west end of the carpark. This carries any sewage discharged from two Combined Sewage Overflows (CSOs), plus an Emergency Overflow, straight into the sea.

  • On 20th June 2023, the Environment Agency sampled the Kersbrook, just before it enters the sea, and found it contained greater than 100,000 E-coli cfu/100ml. That’s more than 200 times greater than the ‘safe’ limit for E-coli bacteria!
  • On 3rd August 2023, the Environment Agency found it contained more than 40 times the ‘safe’ E-coli limit!
  • On 4th July 2023, South West Water released raw sewage, sanitary towels and PPE into the Kersbrook through an Emergency Overflow, and from there directly into the sea. This discharge has been confirmed by the Environment Agency after an FOI request. Further details and photos of this can be found on the ‘Budleigh Sewage Action’ home page.
  • The EA sampled this point 20 times in Summer 2023, and – on average – the samples contained E-coli concentrations more than 14 times greater than the ‘safe’ limit for bathing.

And here’s the Kersbrook outfall as it enters the beach – on the edge of the Lime Kiln bathing area.

“Bubble, bubble, toilet trouble?” Kersbrook outfall below Lime Kiln car park

Go to the original article to watch video.

It’s important to point out that any sewage quickly mixes and gets diluted when it enters the sea, but in the local vicinity of these outfalls (maybe a few hundred meres), concentrations can still be significantly elevated for some time after a discharge. That’s exactly why pollution forecasts are mandatory during the Summer season, but these are based on the impact at the telephone box location.

But that’s not all that swimmers at Lime Kiln have to contend with.

The prevailing current carries the Kersbrook outfall along the bathing beach towards the Otter Estuary.

However, the Otter Estuary itself brings water which receives 31 of South West Water’s sewage overflows (CSOs) and pumping stations during its journey from the Blackdown Hills, as well as significant agricultural run-off. The Environment Agency’s average E-coli reading from the mouth of the River Otter in 2023 was approx. 3,200 E-coli cfu/100ml, that’s a large volume of water at more than 6 times greater than the ‘safe’ E-coli limit for bathing. And all of this bacterial load flows along the Lime Kiln beach area, and then out parallel with the Otter Ledge. Again, this water does mix and dilute when it reaches the sea, but there remains a localised effect for some distance.

So the beach next to Lime Kiln is located directly between these two significant pollution carriers, the effects of which are unlikely to be reasonably picked up by the existing ‘upstream’ sampling point at the Telephone box.

The reality is that we don’t know what the pollution load is actually like below Lime Kiln, because – contrary to the legal framework – no sampling is carried out in this area.

The opposite however, may be true for the Steamer Steps section of the beach.

We know that the background pollution level of the sea around Budleigh is very low. It also appears that the tidal current tends to run predominantly Eastwards along the sea front, potentially taking any bacterial load from the Marine Terrace sewage overflows / Knowle Brook outfall away from Streamer Steps.

So it’s not obvious to see that significant bacterial pollution would affect the Steamer Steps area – which may be some comfort to the majority of locals who use that area for their daily swims, all year round.

The problem is that we don’t know this. We can only surmise. And for as long as the Environment Agency only sample in a place where few people swim, that will continue to be the case.

So what ACTION do we want?

  • Firstly, we need the EA to start sampling at both Steamer Steps and Lime Kiln – beginning in the 2024 Summer Season, and publishing results throughout the season along with the current ‘Telephone box’ sample data. Once they have done this – and published a year or two’s data, we can get a proper understanding of where in Budleigh it is safest to swim
  • It would also be helpful if the EA could specifically forecast pollution alerts for the two main swimming areas, so people can make an informed choice in real time, of where and when to swim
  • Lastly, we all need South West Water to reduce or eliminate this frequent stream of pollution being dumped into Budleigh’s brooks, and into the whole Otter catchment.
  • It would also be great to see a comprehensive focus on cleaning up the agricultural pollution and run-off, right along the Otter river system.

How to achieve this?

  • Write to the EA and our MP, quoting ‘Schedule 4’, of the ‘2013 Bathing Water Regulations’, to request that the Environment Agency sample in accordance with regulations
  • Continue to put pressure on South West Water clean up their act
  • Support any initiatives which aim to improve the water quality of the whole Otter river system

If you’d like to explore the live and interactive ‘Budleigh Sewage Hotspots Map’, click the link.

You can use this map to locate and see all of South West Water’s worst polluting hotspots in Budleigh. Click on each location to see what it looks like (easiest on a PC), and how much pollution it has dumped onto our beach in 2022. We will update this map once we get 2023’s sewage data.

In terms of sampling and forecasting for both Steamer Steps and Lime Kiln swimming areas, the 2013 Directive allows for just our situation, and specifically states that ‘where more than one swimming area is popular, and they are some distance apart, then both locations may be sampled’. That’s just what we need for both local swimmers and our many visitors.

Watchdog has no idea how much sewage is spilling into protected Lake District site

The EA requires water companies to provide data on storm overflow usage but not for emergency overflows (EO). Thanks to Peter Williams we know about the EO at Budleigh’s Lime Kiln pumping station. There must be more. Where are they? – Owl

Lucie Heath inews.co.uk

The watchdog responsible for preserving the environment has no idea how much sewage is being spilt into a protected body of water in the Lake District, i has learnt.

Although the lake is showing signs of environmental damage, the Environment Agency (EA) is not collecting any data on the amount of sewage being dumped into it from an “emergency overflow” pipe.

Esthwaite Water is a 280-acre (1.13 km2) lake connected to England’s largest lake, Windermere. It is known as being the favourite spot of children’s author and former Lake District resident Beatrix Potter, but it now frequently contains algal blooms that can be deadly for the lake’s aquatic life.

While the EA monitors other sewage overflows in the Windermere catchment for spills, the one in Esthwaite remains a blind spot. This is because the watchdog does not track every situation in which water companies dump raw sewage.

Campaigners accused the EA of “failing in its role as regulator”, and called on the watchdog to do more to investigate the sources of pollution in the region to protect the once pristine lake from sewage spills.

It is “absolutely absurd that untreated sewage is being allowed to discharge into a site of special scientific interest – let alone that it’s going unmonitored,” said Matt Staniek, a conservationist and founder of the Save Windermere campaign.

Esthwaite Water has been designated a site of special scientific interest, the name given to areas in the UK that are afforded special protections – for example from development or agriculture – due to their environmental importance.

The lake is also one of the UK’s 141 Ramsar sites, the name given to wetlands deemed to be of international importance, for example due to the wildlife they support.

But several sites in the Lake District, including Esthwaite Water, have shown signs of deterioration over a period of decades, partly due to sewage pollution.

Frequent algal blooms have been observed at Esthwaite Water, a sign of high nutrient levels as a result of sewage and agricultural pollution.

Algal blooms are harmful to freshwater ecosystems as they restrict oxygen levels and in more serious cases can cause mass fish deaths. These blooms can also produce toxins that make humans sick.

The local water company, United Utilities (UU), is allowed to release sewage into the lakes and rivers within the Windermere catchment from various sites.

Usually this sewage is treated at a wastewater treatment plant before being released into the environment, but UU is also permitted to discharge untreated waste during periods of heavy rainfall if its infrastructure is becoming overwhelmed. It does this through pipes called ‘storm overflows’.

The EA requires water companies to provide data on storm overflow usage but not for emergency overflows, such as the pipe releasing sewage into Esthwaite Water.

Concerns have been raised over how often water companies are utilising overflows both within the Lake District and across the wider country.

Latest official figures show water companies in England and Wales spilled from storm overflows more than 380,000 times in 2022, adding up to over two million hours, including 5,904 hours in the Windermere catchment.

But, as i recently revealed, these figures do not show the whole picture because the EA is not currently monitoring water companies’ use of emergency overflows. These can be used to dump untreated sewage during emergencies such as an electrical or mechanical failure.

The watchdog currently only requires water companies to monitor these overflows if they discharge sewage in designated shellfish water, meaning just 10 per cent of England’s almost 7,000 emergency overflows are monitored.

While these overflows are only supposed to be used in rare circumstances, the data available shows some are being used frequently, including those operated by UU.

This includes another emergency overflow in the Lake District, on the banks of Lake Ullswater, that spilled 34 times in 2022, amounting to a total 660 hours.

One of the unmonitored emergency overflows is attached to a pumping station that sits on the western banks of Esthwaite Water.

The only publicly available data on Esthwaite pumping station is patchy, covering a series of months between 2013 and 2017.

It shows the site spilled intermittently during this period, including 17 times during October 2015.

“It’s potentially a big spiller but where is the data? If there was data previously why is there not data now?” asked Mr Staniek.

The conservationist has tried to obtain data about the site, including how often it is has experienced technical failures, through submitting Environmental Information Requests to both the EA and UU.

However, the EA said it did not hold the data he asked for, while UU refused to provide the information.

Mr Staniek said: “Esthwaite holds international ecological significance, yet the Agency is not fully holding United Utilities accountable for the damage being inflicted upon it.”

He called for a public inquiry into the EA, which he said was “failing in its role as regulator”.

‘Transparency is fundamental’

Earlier this year research published by the charity WildFish in collaboration with Save Windermere sampled every river in the Windermere catchment and found a decline in insects in areas near where sewage is discharged.

The groups raised concerns about the impact on wider ecosystems in the area, describing the invertebrates as a “key component of a river’s food web”.

WildFish chief executive Nick Measham said the EA “should be carrying out more monitoring” at Esthwaite, as the lake is “clearly suffering from the impact of too much phosphate or nutrients going into it”.

“In general we would call for all water company discharges to be monitored and for water companies and the Environment Agency to make all of that data available to independent scrutineers. Transparency is fundamental to accountability. At the moment we have water companies that are not transparent and patently not accountable,” he said.

The Environment Agency said: “We are requiring companies to monitor all emergency overflows from 2025, including at Hawkshead and Esthwaite Lodge pumping stations. This is in addition to the 100 per cent of storm overflows in England, which are already monitored. Emergency overflows are different and must only operate in urgent circumstances like electrical powers failures or mains bursts.

“Water companies must already report any discharges of sewage in emergency overflows. We investigate any instances where permits are not being followed and take enforcement action if necessary.”

United Utilities was approached for comment but did not respond.

After 13 years, Tories now need your help to stop pollution

The’re flush out of ideas!

One of Owl’s old feathered friends was puzzled to receive this plea from a “neighbour”:

“Help us improve our water in Budleigh Salterton.”

This “neighbour” turned out to be David Reed, the prospective Tory candidate for the redrawn constituency of Exmouth and Exeter East who doesn’t live in the “neighbourhood”.

Owl’s friend thought that the Conservatives had sorted the problem “once and for all” with the publication of their “Storm Overflows Reduction Plan”.

The policy David Reed is stuck with is one of gradual improvements over the next 26 years.

Left to Conservatives “values” our young candidate will be an old man nearing his 60s before overflows are a thing of the past.

The current MP for Budleigh is the itinerant Simon Jupp. He explained, in the first Westminster Hall debate he proudly led last March why conservatives won’t move any faster:

“……Of course, in a perfect world, we would stop sewage spills completely and immediately. Sadly, that is virtually impossible in the short term; because of the pressure on our water infrastructure, we would risk the collapse of the entire water network, and the eye-watering costs involved mean we would need not just a magic money tree, but a whole forest.

The same point was also made by Thérèse Coffey in her introduction to the policy paper.

Storm Overflows Discharge Reduction Plan Updated: 25 September 2023

In this Plan, we are setting new targets which will revolutionise our sewer system and generate the most significant investment and delivery programme ever undertaken by water companies to protect people and the environment:

• By 2035, water companies will have: improved all storm overflows discharging near every designated bathing water; and improved 75% of storm overflows discharging into or near ‘high priority sites’ (as defined in Annex 1). 

• By 2045, water companies will have improved all remaining storm overflows discharging into or near ‘high priority sites’.

• By 2050, no storm overflows will be permitted to operate outside of unusually heavy rainfall or to cause any adverse ecological harm.

The die is cast with the Tories and Owl’s friend thinks the best way to make progress on improving water is to follow a different path:

Sewage bursts through manhole covers into rare chalk stream for 10 weeks

Raw sewage has been flowing from manholes into a rare chalk stream in Berkshire for more than two months as Thames Water’s infrastructure has struggled to cope with continuing wet weather.

Lucie Heath inews.co.uk 

The village of Lambourn, that sits within the North Wessex Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, has been littered with toilet paper, tampons and “lumps of faeces”.

Samples of the River Lambourn by the local river’s trust found phosphate – which damages rivers and aquatic life – in quantities more than 100 times the recommended level for the protected watercourse.

Thames Water said the problem was a result of the area experiencing one of its wettest winters on record, which has resulted in groundwater levels reaching a 30-year high.

i has reported on multiple incidents of raw sewage flowing through villages, gardens and into rivers this winter as water companies across the UK have struggled to cope with heavy rainfall.

Months of wet weather has resulted in rising levels of groundwater, which is water found underground in the space between soil and rocks. This groundwater can infiltrate through cracks into sewage infrastructure, causing pipes to overflow.

In Lambourn, this contaminated water has been flowing out of three manhole covers down the streets and into the river.

Thames Water has set up a filter that separates solids before this water enters the river, however the water is not being treated for pollutants. Local campaigners claim some solids are still making their way into the river.

Pictures from the village show the streets littered with toilet paper and human waste.

Contaminated water flowing into the River Lambourn (Photo: Action for the River Kennet)

Anna Forbes, the senior project officer at Action for the River Kennet (ARK), the local river’s trust for the area, said the problem is not new for the village. However, the situation has been particularly bad this year, with sewage flowing out of the manholes for the past 10 weeks, she claimed.

“It’s just horrible that you’ve got this beautiful little village and yet people are walking through untreated sewage.

“It absolutely stinks. You feel like you’re breathing it in… there are places where you can’t avoid walking through it.”

On Saturday ARK carried out testing directly where the sewage is entering the river and found phosphate levels at 4.42mg/litre, which is 110 times higher than Natural England’s recommendation for a body of water with the same protections as the Lambourn (0.04mg/litre).

Thames Water said it regularly monitors water quality of the River Lambourn and said this testing shows “a minimal impact on the environment because the flows are heavily diluted by the groundwater and surface water run-off”.

High levels of phosphates are damaging to rivers as it causes algal blooms, which can starve aquatic life for oxygen.

Nutrient pollution is a particular concern for chalk streams, such as the Lambourn, because they are a globally rare habitat.

Ms Forbes said: “There are only 260 of them [chalk streams] in the world and 224 of them – so over 85 per cent – of them are here in England.

“And when they’re healthy, because of their unique qualities, it’s a really fragile ecosystem that sustains a wealth of wildlife. So things like mayfly, brown trout, water voles, otters, kingfishers, all these wonderful native species we’ve got, but many of them rely on the river being healthy, with good water quality being key.”

Thames Water said: “We’re sorry that customers have been affected as our sewers have become overloaded by floodwaters in the River Lambourn area. The excessively heavy rain that the region has experienced means the groundwater and river levels remain very high in this area and the ground is saturated. A significant amount of this water is entering the local sewer system and causing flooding from manholes.

“We are working hard to keep our sewers flowing and to prevent further flooding. We’re carrying out daily clean-ups where the manholes have been overflowing in Lambourn and we’re using tankers at our sewage pumping station in Upper Lambourn 24 hours a day to help manage excess flows in the sewers. We also have a filter unit in place near Lambourn fire station, which uses a pump to take the excess water out of our foul sewer, so it can be screened and then safely returned to the river.

“We’re continuing to work closely with the Lambourn Valley Flood Forum and we continue to investigate where groundwater and surface water is getting into the sewer system. We’ve previously installed 10.1km of leak-tight liners in our sewers, and have sealed 122 manholes in the local sewer network.”

Covid hits a three-year low but it will be back, scientists warn

Covid infections in the UK are at their lowest level in nearly three years, tumbling to just a fifth of the level they were before Christmas, according to the latest figures.

Tom Bawden inews.co.uk 

Official data shows that 0.9 per cent of the population in England and Scotland – less than 1 in 100 – had Covid in mid-February, compared to 4.6 per cent in late December.

This is the lowest level since July 2021 decline was helped as immunity from boosters and previous infections built up and the weather warmed up.

The figures were reported in the latest UK Health Security Agency and ONS infection survey.

However, while scientists welcomed the drop in infections, they cautioned that the virus is not going anywhere.

They warn that it will be around for years to come – probably at lower levels and with fewer spikes, but still present and with the possibility of a resurgence if a nasty new variant develops.

They say a new wave is likely in the autumn with smaller spikes also a possibility later in the spring or in the summer – depending on whether dangerous new variants develop, how well immunity holds up and how many people get a booster in the spring.

“Covid infections are here for ever. They will never go away,” said Professor Paul Hunter, of University of East Anglia.

(Source: UKHSA. The gap in the graph relates to a period in which the government stopped surveillance.

He predicts “a series of waves”, driven by the weather – with more cases in the winter – and contagious new strains, known as escape variants.

“I know we will see another wave in the autumn and we can say pretty definitely that infections will peak each year around December and January for the rest of our lives – although the burden of disease from Covid will continue to decline over coming years,” he said.

“Whether we see significant spring summer peaks is uncertain. Unless a new escape variant appears any spring or summer peak will probably not be that great.”

Professor Steve Griffin, of Leeds University, thinks it more likely we will see a resurgence in the next few months.

“I would be surprised if we don’t see another wave before the summer given the rate at which the virus is evolving and the absence of effective vaccination since autumn.

“The total lack of public health mitigations continues to be detrimental, causing absence, loss of work and profound health issues. Just because this isn’t winter 2020/21, it doesn’t mean we can ignore it. To live with something, we must understand and adapt, not pretend it isn’t there.”

Professor Lawrence Young, a virologist at Warwick University, agreed that “there is no room for complacency” despite the fall in Covid cases.

“Covid is here to stay. It is still circulating and, more worryingly, changing. We are likely to be confronted with new virus variants that could be more infectious and more able to dodge the immune protection from vaccination,” he said.

“There is also the worrying issue of the long term consequences of infection and increasing evidence that this virus can lurk in our bodies for many months after initial infection.”

Professor Young says there was a risk of a new round in the coming weeks and months as people start to mix more, although he expects any peak to be well below previous records.

“We need to keep an eye on infection levels over the next few months as people start to mix – particularly at various big events, such as the Cheltenham Gold Cup next week – and start travelling abroad on holidays over Easter.

“It is very unlikely that we see levels of infection that we experienced in previous years but the behaviour of this virus is unpredictable. So much will depend on whether new virus variants emerge and the levels of immunity in the population.”

He added: “The big question is what will happen with boosters over the Spring. The current advice is that only adults aged over 75 years, residents in care homes, and anyone aged six months or over who is immunosuppressed, will be eligible for free Covid vaccines.

“There will also be private access to them from April at £45 and appointments are now bookable. How many people will decide to have a booster jab and what this will mean for levels of population immunity is another uncertainty.”

Professor Rowland Kao, of Edinburgh University, is hopeful that things are improving but says we “are not totally out of the woods yet”.

However, “the longer we go without another major variant of concern that leads to massive rises in severe cases, then the more optimistic we can be.

“I would like to see what happens this summer. If we go through the summer without further major spikes – remember we had smaller surges in May and September last year – I would be more confident that Covid is settling down into more of a seasonal and predictable pattern.

“This would still be important because of the illness it does cause, but means it is more likely to be predictable the way seasonal flu, RSV and others are. And predictability matters a great deal.”

New plan for council’s former Knowle HQ

It’s not much different to one previously rejected.

Plans to knock down the former council offices at the Knowle in Sidmouth for a care and retirement development have been submitted for approval again after being refused in January. 

Will Goddard, local democracy reporter www.radioexe.co.uk 

But the only change is the removal of a handful of balconies from one side of a block of retirement flats. 

East Devon District Council (EDDC)’s former HQ, which was also once a hotel, was severely damaged by fire in a suspected case of arson last March. 

Retirement homes specialist McCarthy and Stone wants to demolish it and build a 70-bed care home, 53 assisted living apartments for over-70s and 33 apartments for over-60s, as well as non-age-restricted properties in the form of four semi-detached homes and a terrace of three townhouses. 

A former caretaker’s building would have been kept, and another purpose-built structure erected, for bat habitats. 

EDDC’s planning committee refused the application two months ago on grounds the design of the two southerly blocks would not have reflected “local distinctiveness”, and the block of flats for over-60s with its “large windows and balconies” would have been too overbearing on properties in Knowle Drive to the west. 

The fresh plans ask permission for the same as before with only a minor change: removing the second-floor balconies on the western side of the over-60s block. 

This will “provide a lessening of impact… upon the residential and visual amenities of the occupiers of neighbouring [properties] in Knowle Drive”, according to planning documents. 

They also hope the revised plans will allow “more detailed discussions” with EDDC to address the reasons for refusal, which could lead to further changes and “potentially avoid the need to take the scheme to an appeal”, planning documents say. 

So far, members of the public seem largely unimpressed by the new proposals, with 23 objections and two comments in support. 

David and Naomi Hogg, objecting, describe the removal of the balconies as a “minimal attempt to address the issue of overlooking and overbearing”.  

They said: “It fails to recognise the significant overbearing effect caused simply by the fact that this three-storey block would be built on substantially higher ground than that of the neighbouring properties on Knowle Drive.” 

But Norma Pearce writes in support: “As an elderly resident of Sidmouth and an intended future occupant of this comprehensive development… The current amended proposal re: removal of balconies is an appropriate price to pay, to preserve the privacy of nearby residents.” 

Conservatives lose control of last borough council in Surrey

Oops! – Owl

Surrey’s last district and borough council with a Conservative majority has gone to no overall control.

BBC news South East

Reigate & Banstead Borough Council, one of 11 lower tier councils in Surrey, had a Conservative majority of one after 2023’s local elections.

But with Councillor Zelanie Cooper, who represents Lower Kingswood, Tadworth and Walton, stepping away from the Conservatives, the council is left without a majority party.

The Surrey Conservatives have been contacted for comment.

Ms Cooper said she had left the party over concerns about candidate selection, meaning the Conservatives now have 22 of 45 councillors.

She said: “With the support of a significant number of local residents, who believe that local councillors should represent them in local elections, I have chosen to step away from the Conservative Party.”

She will stand as an independent councillor at the next local election on 2 May, when one third of councillors will be up for election.

Surrey County Council still has a Conservative majority and all 11 Members of Parliament for Surrey represent the Conservative Party.

They include Chancellor Jeremy Hunt in South West Surrey and Michael Gove in Surrey Heath, the Secretary of State for levelling up, housing and communities.

Surrey’s two tier system means the responsibilities for different services lie with either the county or the district and borough councils.

A Reigate & Banstead Borough Council spokesperson said any decision needed regarding political balance of the council would be taken at the next full council meeting on 28 March.

Elsewhere in Surrey, at May 2023’s elections the Liberal Democrats took control of Guildford and Surrey Heath and increased the majorities they already had at Woking and Mole Valley.

Other councils are run by residents’ parties or as coalitions between parties, while Runnymede Borough Council is led by a Conservative, who have 19 of the 41 seats.

Analysis

By Jack Fiehn, BBC Radio Surrey political reporter

The political control at Reigate & Banstead could change soon, either following a council meeting at the end of March or the local elections at the beginning of May.

For example, at the elections, the Conservatives could make the gains they need to retake overall control. Or they could lose seats, altering the calculation again.

But it is worth taking a moment to mark the contrast in the Tories’ fortunes.

As recently as 2015, the party had majorities on and ran 10 out of 11 of the borough or district councils in Surrey (Epsom & Ewell being the exception).

Now it is only Reigate & Banstead and Runnymede where they are still the main force.

Jeremy Hunt’s Budget failed to address ‘the real challenges’ facing UK, IFS warns

Jeremy Hunt’s Budget failed to address the “real challenges” facing Britain, the boss of Britain’s most influential economic think tank has warned.

Archie Mitchell www.independent.co.uk 

Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), laid bare the chaos facing the NHS, local authorities, social care and the justice system, and said the chancellor had not been “transparent” about the scale of the problems.

And, in a damning assessment of the Conservative government and Labour, he said both are engaged in a “conspiracy of silence” about just how bleak the outlook for the country is.

In his widely-watched post-Budget analysis, Mr Johnson said: “This was not a budget which addressed the real challenges we are facing because it was not transparent about what those challenges are.

“Government and opposition are joining in a conspiracy of silence in not acknowledging the scale of the choices and trade-offs that will face us after the election. They, and we, could be in for a rude awakening when those choices become unavoidable.”

As the impacts of the chancellor’s Budget became clear:

  • The IFS said Jeremy Hunt had failed to address the “real challenges” facing the country
  • Its director accused Labour and the Conservatives of engaging in a “conspiracy of silence” about those challenges
  • The Resolution Foundation said living standards would fall this parliament for the first time on record 
  • Rishi Sunak doubled down on Jeremy Hunt’s suggestion that the Tories would seek to scrap national insurance, a move branded “reckless” by Labour 
  • Mr Hunt claimed he was bringing down the tax burden “in a way that is responsible and protects our public services”
  • Shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves said the government had “given with one hand and taken much more with the other”

Mr Johnson said Mr Hunt’s Budget “did not change anything very significantly… which is a shame”.

The economist said the national debt is at its highest in 70 years and “showing no signs of falling”, while interest payments soar. And he highlighted a “worrying increases in the number of individuals moving onto health and disability related benefits”, which brings its own “huge challenges” to the public purse.

And, after Mr Hunt offered voters a pre-election bung in the form of a 2p national insurance cut, Mr Johnson said the Budget came with “big implicit cuts in public investment spending overall and cuts to many areas of day-to-day spending on public services despite very obvious signs of strain in many areas”.

Rachel Reeves accused the chancellor of giving with one hand and taking ‘much more’ back with the other

“One only has to look at the scale of NHS waiting lists, the number of local authorities at or near bankruptcy, the backlogs in the justice system, the long-term cuts to university funding, the struggles of the social care system, to wonder where these cuts will really, credibly come from,” he added. Mr Johnson warned that cuts to day-to-day spending on a range of public services outside of health, defence and education, will have to fall by around £20 billion.

The damning verdict came as the Resolution Foundation warned that Rishi Sunak and Mr Hunt will oversee the first ever fall in living standards between elections despite Wednesday’s tax-cutting Budget, the Resolution Foundation has warned.

In its own withering assesment of the state of the economy, the think tank said this has been a parliament of “flatlining growth” and falling living standards.

And, even accounting for the chancellor’s national insurance giveaway, the Resolution Foundation said that by the next election, households’ disposable income will have fallen by 0.9 per cent – the first parliament in modern history to see a fall in living standards.

Chief executive Torsten Bell said: “Budgets are always a big day for Westminster, but the big picture for Britain has not changed at all. This remains a country where taxes are heading up not down, and one where incomes are stagnating.”

And he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “If you look over the course of the last 15 years, what we see is that our wages today are back where they were in 2008.

“In fact, the Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR) says we won’t get back to 2008 wage levels until 2026.

“That’s 18 last years of wage growth.”

The think tank also pointed to the “implausible” post-election spending cuts pencilled in by Mr Hunt to give him room for the tax handouts without breaching his so-called “fiscal rules”.

Mr Bell added: “Big tax cuts may or may not affect the outcome of that election, but the task for whoever wins is huge.

“They will need to both wrestle with implausible spending cuts, and also restart sustained economic growth – the only route to end Britain’s stagnation.”

It comes after Mr Hunt used Wednesday’s Budget, likely the last before an autumn general election, to cut 2p from national insurance, saving a person on an average £35,000 salary around £450 a year. Combined with a cut last autumn, the chancellor said average earners would now be £900 better off.

But despite the handout, which Mr Hunt and the PM had hoped would boost the Tories’ dire poll ratings, experts warned the savings for voters had been eclipsed by the amount taken back through so-called stealth taxes.

The highly respected Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said for every £1 handed back to voters by the chancellor, the decision to freeze tax thresholds would claim £1.30 as taxpayers are dragged into higher brackets.

Defending his Budget on Thursday, Mr Hunt said he was bringing down the tax burden “in a way that is responsible and protects our public services”.

“That’s what I have done in the autumn statement and the spring Budget, if you want to see that continue then it is only the Conservative Party that wants to bring down the tax burden,” he told Sky News.

Mr Hunt also doubled down on the suggestion he wants to phase out national insurance as a tax altogether, describing it as an “unfair” levy. He admitted it will not happen “any time soon”, but suggested one option would be to merge income tax and national insurance.

Pressed on whether Wednesday’s Budget set the stage for a May 2 election, Mr Hunt insisted it was a decision for Mr Sunak, whose current plan is to go to the country this autumn.

It came as shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves savaged the Budget, highlighting Labour analysis of OBR figures which show average families will be left £870 per year worse off by Mr Hunt’s measures.

“The government have given with one hand and taken much more with the other,” she told Today.