Old Park Farm 2: some objectors comments for the DMC to think about tomorrow

….. I would comment on the level of community involvement in this application. The statement of community involvement submitted by the applicants’ agent considered that it is not “considered necessary to undertake community consultation to the extent which might normally be expected”.

…..I write on behalf of myself and my husband. We are one of the closest residents to the proposals and were only made aware of the proposals because of media attention.

Putting aside the fact that we have not been consulted on something so close to our property (…..20m or less away from us) we wish to strongly object on the following grounds:

…..Millwood has taken Counsel’s advice in respect of the interrelationship between OPF2 and Pinn Court. In the event that OPF2 is permitted in advance of Pinn Court, Millwood intends to lodge a judicial review of the decision.

…..It is my understanding that there claims to have been local consultation over this matter. This I find difficult to understand. I live some 50 metres form the first of the two mini roundabouts, if approaching from the Heart of Oak side on Main Road. In my experience there has been no attempt to obtain my views on this proposed redevelopment of the roundabouts. Consultation could have been attempted to affected householders by letter, leaflet drop or cold calling to households. Here it appears to have been by stealth, whisper quietly about it, post some very small planning application to a non descript lamp post or take out a small advert in a paper if indeed any of them. All of the immediately mentioned methods can hardly be called consulting!

…..Note to EDDC – Advertising of such a large scale developments deserve more than a single notice tied to a lamppost. This is worthy of a leaflet drop to the area, since the long term financial benefits to EDDC through council tax would more than cover this short term cost. EDDC wake up to your moral and social responsibilities and not just the ones that central government dictates!

….For some reason we have been left out of any consultations, only finding out about meetings where we could object, after the event, ..

…..The plans seem to have been little publicised and despite living around a mile from the proposed access road, have only discovered the plans through spotting a dishevelled notice half way down a post at the side of the road.

Development Management – democracy or “special” treatment – tomorrow’s DMC meeting – your chance to have your say

If you believe that EDDC should not be hearing planning applications that are not in the old or new local plan before they receive the initial comments of the Planning Inspector who reviewed the Local Plan (and who has promised them by 31 March 2014) please attend the Development Management Committee meeting on 25 March 2014 at 2 pm (Knowle – agenda HERE) where two planning applications for hundreds of houses which may not be needed have been speed-tracked (see posts below) by the creation of this “special” meeting. A routine meeting of the committee is being held on 1 April 2014.

 

Why has the Old Park Farm planning application been pushed forward? ‘Special’ DMC meeting tomorrow at Knowle.

Disturbing evidence about a major planning application for mass housing on farmland (at Pinn Court Farm and Old Park Farm, Broadclyst) , has been brought to EDA’s attention. A Development Management Committee ‘special meeting’ has been called to decide on the planning application, tomorrow (Tues. 25th March, 2pm at Knowle).
For a copy of the agenda, please see following link… EDDC Dev Man Ctee Agenda
For a list of objections, please see 13/0001/MOUT and 13/2447/MOUT at Planning Portal

The “we must decide this within 13 weeks” excuse for determining “Old Park Farm 2”

Which reinforces the fact that there seems to be absolutely no reason for a special meeting just days in advance of the first communication from the Planning Inspector – due by 31 March 2014.

Taken from a comment on claire-wright.org by Rose Pengelly:

OUTLINE PLANNING APPLICATION 13/0001/MOUT – OLD PARK FARM
East Devon District Council have accommodated this Special Development Management Meeting to consider an Outline Planning Application not in the Local Plan and is making an attempt to fast-track a decision.

The Councils reason made in a statement to the press are not true, this is what the guidelines say Determining a planning application:

What are the time periods for determining a planning application?
Paragraph: 001 Reference ID: 21b-001-20140306

Once a planning application has been validated, the local planning authority should make a decision on the proposal as quickly as possible, and in any event within the statutory time limit unless a longer period is agreed in writing with the applicant.

The statutory time limits are usually 13 weeks for applications for major development and eight weeks for all other types of development (unless an application is subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment, in which case a 16 week limit applies).

Where a planning application takes longer than the statutory period to decide, and an extended period has not been agreed with the applicant, the Government’s policy is that the decision should be made within 26 weeks at most in order to comply with the ‘planning guarantee’.

Revision date: 06 03 2014
Paragraph: 002 Reference ID: 21b-002-20140306
What is the Government’s ‘planning guarantee’?

The planning guarantee is the Government’s policy that no application should spend more than a year with decision-makers, including any appeal.

In practice this means that planning applications should be decided in no more than 26 weeks, allowing a similar period for any appeal.

The planning guarantee does not replace the statutory time limits for determining planning applications.
Revision date: 06 03 2014

The “Old Park Farm 2” planning application and its “special Development Management Committee meeting” on 25 March 2014 – what you can do

This is the planning application that does not figure either in the old Local Plan nor the new one- part of this development is from a former East Devon Business Forum member.  The inspector who heard evidence regarding the new Local Plan has promised to communicate his initial findings to EDDC by 31 March 2014.

EDDC says that it “must” decide this planning application within 13 weeks of receiving it.  This is not true.  A council CAN wait longer than 13 weeks to determine a planning application (and many do) but a developer could then appeal because it has taken too long.  However, it is possible that before the developer could appeal on this particular planning application the Planning Inspector might indicate that there is no need for the two developments in this area. In In which case more than 400 extra houses will be built which are not needed.

There is a debate about exactly when that time runs out – it could be early April depending on when you think the last documents were put on the EDDC website.  However, EDDC officers have rushed through a “special” meeting to hear this application before the Planning Inspector’s comments arrive.  Also, there is another DMC meeting on 1 April 2014 and we are entitled to ask:  why is it necessary to hear this application on 25 March (before the Inspector reports) when there is a meeting on 1 April (after the Inspector reports)?

If you want to object to this state of affairs, there are several things you can do:

1.  Turn up at the Development Management Committee meeting on 25 March 2014 at 2 pm and make your views known – you will have up to 3 minutes to speak (provided you do not repeat statements already made by other speakers).

2.  You can write to your local district councillors (if you are not sure who your councillor is find out HERE).

3.  You are allowed to write to individual members of the Development Management Committee individually (using the link to councillors HERE)

4.  Write to your local MP, Hugo Swire, HERE,  telling him how unhappy you are about this.

5.  Write letters to local newspapers about it (and national newspapers if you wish too)

“They’re not making new farmland,” warns NFU.

At a conference organised yesterday by the Devon WI (Our Changing Countryside. What does the future hold?), National Farmers’ Union (NFU) spokesman, Andrew Butler, warned of the dangers of “taking land out of the system, for urbanisation”.The NFU predicts increasing volatility in staples (rice, soya, wheat), leading to issues of food security and permanently rising food prices.There’s a need “to look more at the economic and social asset of farmland”, he said.
So the plan to lose two more East Devon farms to mass development seems seriously misguided. The urbanisation of Pinn Court Farm and Old Park Farm, (near Pinhoe and Westclyst), involves key players in the curiously collapsed East Devon Business Forum. What do EDDC officers think about this planning application? Details at this link:

http://sidmouthindependentnews.wordpress.com/2014/03/17/the-special-development-management-committee-meeting-express-and-echo/

CranBROOK

Cranbrook city centre...floods of interest

Will West End overdevelopment add to the flood risk on the River Clyst floodplain? Steven Moore of the Environment Agency recently assured EDA member, Graham Cooper, that flood risk measures for the Intermodal and Skypark have been fully in place for a number of years. He explained that the country park at the Intermodal and Cranbrook had lagoons in place and there were sub surface water retention tanks at Skypark.
The above photograph taken earlier this month, before any substantial development has taken place, appears to give other signals, as did the EA severe flood warnings in place for the area on 4th March, when the main A3052 was also flooded.

EDA deplores EDDC’s Skypark choice, as costs spiral in the office relocation fiasco.

The East Devon Alliance has today sent out this press release:

ANOTHER COSTLY HEAD OFFICE ERROR BY EDDC ?
Local residents, EDDC’s own watchdog committee, and own staff defied

The Cabinet of the East Devon District Council has selected Skypark as its preferred site for its headquarters. If the decision is approved by the full Council on 26th February, officers would carry out further research into the viability of the move. Marketing of the Knowle would begin “promptly”. A final decision would be taken in the summer. No financial details of the proposed move were announced to justify the decision to leave the Knowle in favour of a site which, currently, has poor transport links and certainly does not fit the Council’s claims that its District headquarters should be somewhere more central than Sidmouth.

The East Devon Alliance deplores this choice, and EDDC’s undemocratic insistence on a project which has no clear financial justification. As Head of the Relocation Team, Richard Cohen , admitted to the Council’s own Scrutiny Committee recently, he has not asked the Head of Finance for “a full breakdown of the costs”. And yet, in addition to the substantial expenses already incurred (well over £350,000), the Council plans to set aside a further £400,000 of tax payers’ money over the next two years, just for preparations.

EDA Chairman Ian McKintosh says, “Economically, this is not the time to rush ahead with a massive spending of public funds, on a move that is widely regarded as imprudent.” Coherent arguments in favour of retaining the Knowle have been ridiculed by the Leadership, without serious debate. Sidmouth resident Robin Fuller’s detailed suggestions for refurbishment of the existing purpose-built buildings, and possible sale or conversion of the historic former hotel, were patronisingly dismissed by Councillor Diviani in just two words, as “Fuller’s Folly?”.

Astonishingly, local voters are not the only people who have been ignored. EDDC’s Overview and Scrutiny Committee (OSC) agreed last week that Councillors had not been properly informed of the cost calculations, resulting in serious reservations about the financial viability and even the necessity for office relocation. The OSC therefore voted that the Cabinet be asked to provide more precise details in order that Councillors could “make an informed decision” . The same committee also recommended that an independent survey of the Knowle buildings, particularly of the 1970’s offices, should be undertaken. No mention of this was made in EDDC’s announcement.

EDDC’s determination to move, whatever the evidence and the wishes of those who fund the Council, is confirmed in that they have also ignored their own staff. EDDC Chief Executive Mark Williams recently issued the results of a survey of EDDC employees, who were asked for their preferred location, other than the Knowle. Of the four sites named, Skypark was least favoured. Not for the first time, EDDC’s, mathematical abilities were challenged. The total of all the percentages for each location came to 149 per cent! ‘

Skypark and the Clyst valley floodplain

A problematic combination? Some thoughts here: http://futuresforumvgs.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/knowle-relocation-project-moving-to_1252.html

EDDC HQ at Skypark not ideal, as EDDC explains

The Save our Sidmouth website has details: http://saveoursidmouth.com/2014/02/09/disadvantages-of-skypark-site-for-their-hq-according-to-eddc/
An East Devon Alliance press release on the Skypark announcement, will be posted shortly.

How Cranbrook puts strain on the area’s health services.

The Express and Echo explains this increasing problem, with reference to the current situation at Pinhoe and Broadclyst. See http://sidmouthindependentnews.wordpress.com/2014/02/05/putting-the-housing-cart-in-front-of-the-health-horse-in-east-devon/

PLEA FROM DOCTORS: EAST DEVON’S POPULATION EXPLOSION IS ‘CRIPPLING US.’

At last night’s Overview and Scrutiny Committee meeting EDDC heard a desperate plea from the local health authority requesting an opportunity to speak to planning officers regarding East Devon’s unsustainable population rise. GP services across the region are already stretched to breaking point. They indicate a clear disconnect between the number of planning approvals and the region’s ability to sustain them.

Tamara Powderly of the NHS Commissioning Board (Eastern) stated ‘If you could just give our doctors the opportunity to talk to you and let the planning officers know their thoughts, we would make the time. It is this demography that is crippling us in the quality of services that our patients need.’

Councillor Mike Allen (Cons, Honiton) noted that East Devon’s new town, Cranbrook,already has 1200 inhabitants and this time next year it will be 2500. The fact that Cranbrook’s ultimate total is supposed to be 8000 seems to be a disaster waiting to happen.

It points to a painful lack of genuine localism from central government who continue pressuring District Authorities to approve more home-building right across England – which for its size is already Europe’s most densely populated nation.

First of two ADDITIONAL major planning applications at Westclyst go to appeal

Residents of East Devon’s west end, already experiencing the consequences of the massive housing estates enveloping villages and farmland, have now learned that an Inquiry will decide a further appeal by developers.

The deadline for objections is 7th February 2014. Quote reference : 12/0795/MOUT – Pinn Court Farm Pinncourt Lane Exeter EX1 3TG

Details have been circulated as follows:    Pinn Court Farm Planning App Appeal Jan 2014