‘Sewage pollution in the River Exe is unacceptable’ in Blue Flag Exmouth

The owner of Exmouth Watersports company has written to South West Water claiming that sewage pollution in the sea is damaging his business.

Exmouth has been a  “Blue Flag” beach for five years. Despite this, a correspondent recently added up all the sewage discharges recorded by the rivers trust for their latest annual report. This found that Exmouth had over 2,000 hours of outfall into Lyme Bay and the Exe. 

2,000 hours of sewage discharge merits a “Blue Flag”- how come? – Owl

Adam Manning www.exmouthjournal.co.uk 

Stephen Rollason Managing Director of Red Rock Leisure Ltd, which owns PrattsHayes campsite and Exmouth Water sports has written the letter to South West Water in reference to the sewage spills into the estuary, river and seas over the past year. 

Stephen said in the letter: “We work hard to encourage in the region of 20 thousands visitors to our campsite, wedding venue and watersports/activity centre. To then have received so much bad feed back and complaints due to the closure of bathing and watersports is surely unacceptable. There is also an obvious financial loss as we have to refund customers who cannot go out out on the water and the loss we have suffered from guests no longer wishing to return to East Devon.

“In our times when the environment is such and issue, should we not be leading the way and showing care to our environment and protect our resources for the future generations? As a company we have planted thousands of trees and support green levies. We teach our customers about sustainability and about protecting nature.

“We pay out extra for green energy and environmentally green waste collections. And we are in the process of possible large scale solar system, we are trying to do our bit for the environment.”

In response, a South West Water spokesman told the Journal: “We want everyone to feel confident about water quality across our region and proud of the performance of their water company.

“We continue to reduce our use of storm overflows but we know there is more to do. We are investing in several schemes in Exmouth to prevent surface water entering the sewer network and to reduce spills.

“All overflows in Exmouth are currently included in plans to be improved by the end of 2030.”

They concluded: “We have a plan, it is working and we won’t stop until everyone can feel proud about the performance of their water company in the South West.”

Olly Davey becomes first Green Party mayor of Exmouth

Exmouth Town Councillors have voted in a new mayor – Green Party councillor Olly Davey.

Adam Manning www.exmouthjournal.co.uk 

At the Exmouth Town meeting held on Monday, May 22, Cllr Davey became the new mayor, with independent councillor Jo Whibley as his deputy mayor.

Cllr Davey takes over the mayorial role from Cllr Steve Gazzard, an independent who represents Exmouth Withycombe, who had been the mayor since May 2019.

Cllr Davey said: “I am honoured to be the first Green mayor of Exmouth and thank Exmouth Town councillors for nominating and electing me to this position. I shall aim to represent Exmouth and its people to the best of my ability”.

Olly has served as a district councillor and town councillor for the last four years and has been re elected as a district councillor for Exmouth town ward.

As a member of the EDDC strategic planning committee  he has been involved in the development of the draft new local plan for East Devon. He is now in a key role to ensure that the views of Exmouth Town are considered by the district council.

Following the district council elections in May, councillor Steve Gazzard was re-elected for another term.

He spoke to the Journal at the count: “I’m delighted to be re-elected, whether people voted for me or not we are here to serve the community and we will do what we can for residents until the next election.

“We did not set out specific aims in our manifesto but if any residents what to come and raise something with us we can do what we can to help.”

After an election, councillors agree at the next council meeting a new mayor and deputy. 

Apologies – Owl gets the giggles in the Annual Meeting

Outgoing Council Chair Ian Thomas did not seek re-election. 

However, his retirement was delayed as he was required to return to the “colours” to preside over the nomination and election of the new Chair, Cllr Eleanor Rylance.

Thereafter, protocol apparently required that he be described as the “Dowager Councillor” Thomas.

The new Chair, in her words recalling and thanking him for his long service in EDDC, culminating in deftly chairing the past couple of years of the coalition, struggled with that.

(So did Owl)

Civil servants ‘have to fact-check’ Suella Braverman’s claims to cabinet

Suella Braverman is facing fresh controversy after it was claimed civil servants in her department were forced to “fact-check” the home secretary’s statements to cabinet on up to six occasions.

Aubrey Allegretti www.theguardian.com 

Concerns have been raised about the under-fire minister’s competence, as Downing Street denied Rishi Sunak was dithering about whether to launch an investigation into a potential breach of the ministerial code over her bid to avoid a speeding fine.

Government sources told the Guardian Braverman has repeatedly got things wrong, including during cabinet talks about King Charles’s coronation in March and in meetings held this week on migration, in which she overstated the number of Ukrainians and Hongkongers who had come to the UK by tens of thousands.

One insider said she made “basic errors”, while another said she “keeps getting facts wrong”. After meetings with other senior ministers, the Cabinet Office was said to have had to contact officials from the Home Office, who were asked to “factcheck” her claims.

There was no such similar problem when her predecessor, Priti Patel, ran the Home Office, the Guardian was told.

A source close to Braverman disputed the suggestions and claimed they had no awareness of such issues.

Sunak has not yet decided whether to ask his ethics adviser to look into Braverman’s attempt to arrange a private speed awareness course and concerns about her attempt to draw on civil servants to help her.

He has asked her for “further information”, according to the Cabinet Office minister Jeremy Quin, who fielded questions in the Commons on Tuesday.

Despite no firm decision having been publicly announced, No 10 insiders suggested that Braverman could be in the clear because they felt there had not been enough of a public outcry for her to face a severe sanction.

Tory MPs are in a “mutinous” mood, with government frontbenchers understood to have spoken to figures in the whips’ office to voice their frustration with a lack of action being taken against Braverman.

Braverman’s special adviser, who is accused of having told a journalist who asked whether she had been caught speeding that it was “nonsense” before the story became public, is also coming under scrutiny. Sunak’s spokesperson confirmed they were being looked at “in the round”.

Some Whitehall experts and former civil servants have downplayed a potential breach of the rules by Baverman.

Gus O’Donnell, a former head of the civil service, told an event at the Institute for Government on Tuesday morning: “One of the things that was wrong about the ministerial code [is] that people thought, journalists in particular, about this, ‘A-ha, gotcha! You broke the ministerial code, therefore you must resign’, which is not true.

“It shouldn’t be true. It should be, ‘You broke the ministerial code, it is actually a relatively minor offence, I am going to give you a yellow card and we’ll move on’.”

Jill Rutter, a former No 10 civil servant and government expert at UK in a Changing Europe and the Institute for Government, also said it might fall into the category of a bad judgment for which she is in “final, final warning territory”.

She said the context and tone of the incident was important, including how strongly she had asked civil servants to look into a private course. “Should she have asked? Probably not. That’s bad judgment and an inappropriate thing to do. But if people said they couldn’t help her, and in terms of ordering the civil service around, it looks as if she desisted. If she was just inquiring whether this was possible, it is different from saying: ‘Look, I’m the home secretary, don’t you know who I am?’ It’s all bad, but Sunak will have to decide: is it worth sacking her over?”

She said in a more functioning system the ethics adviser, Sir Laurie Magnus, would be able to order his own investigation rather than relying on Sunak as the person to trigger an inquiry.

Braverman has defenders within politics, particularly on the Eurosceptic right of the party. One political aide who has worked with Braverman said she was steely and extremely clever, as well as persistently underestimated by her colleagues.

They said she was still very well-regarded by the European Research Group wing of the party and Sunak would not be strong enough to move against her, even if he wanted to.

South West Water’s apology for sewage dumping deemed “too little, too late”

MP Richard Foord has called for South West Water to be overhauled following an overdue apology for sewage dumping. In a statement issued through Water UK, water and sewage companies admitted to dragging their heels on taking action to stop sewage discharges into our coastlines, rivers and lakes.

Lewis Clarke www.devonlive.com 

In the wake of this announcement, Tiverton & Honiton MP Richard Foord has said the apology is far too late, and that it is meaningless unless the firm is completely reformed.

The Liberal Democrats are calling for water firms to become “public benefit companies,” making environmental goals more important than profits, and making it compulsory for environmental experts to sit on their company boards.

They say this would put an end to billions of pounds being wasted in dividends whilst sewage destroys waterways.

Devon Liberal Democrats are also demanding an apology from the region’s Conservative MPs, saying they repeatedly voted down tougher action on water firms.

Commenting, MP Richard Foord said: “This announcement is too little too late after years of putting public health at risk and large-scale environmental damage, which has previously been arrogantly dismissed by the water industry.

“This apology means nothing unless the firm is completely reformed from top to bottom. Protecting the environment should be more important than making overseas investors rich. Sadly, South West Water still has their priorities all wrong.

“To add insult to injury, this Conservative MPs across the West Country have spent recent years voting down tougher action on polluting water firms. They too owe people an apology.”

Mr Foord has welcomed the announcement that Ofwat has launched an investigation into South West Water, warning that the company has ‘serious failings’ that need to be addressed. Commenting, Richard Foord said: “The fact that Ofwat has launched this investigation into South West Water reinforces what we already knew – that there are serious failings in the way some of our utility companies are being run.

“This action is overdue, as it’s clear that South West Water is being run for the benefit of shareholders; our local communities are an afterthought. Their negligence has seen a stream of sewage dumped in our rivers and on our beaches, while communities are left facing burst pipes and hosepipe bans.

“The Government has repeatedly rebuffed Liberal Democrats’ efforts to clamp down on this behaviour, claiming that Ofwat has the ability to properly regulate the actions of water companies. Sadly, to date we’ve seen little tangible action.

“Now is their chance to prove they mean business and reassure the public that water company bosses will not be allowed to get away with this shockingly poor performance.”

A South West Water spokesperson said: “We agree with the messages shared by Water UK. As we have said, we know there is more to do. We are investing more than ever before, we have a plan and it is working. We take our responsibilities to customers, the environment and society as a whole extremely seriously. We won’t give up until people have a water company they are proud of.”

Matt Hall to resign Sherborne West seat on Dorset Council

A Dorset Council councillor is to resign his seat after winning an election at Exmouth in Devon.

[He not only won in Exmouth but has been appointed to the EDDC cabinet on the basis of his experience! – Owl]

Trevor Bevins www.dorsetecho.co.uk 

Cllr Matt Hall had moved to the neighbouring county to take up a job as a planning officer after recently qualifying.

His move is likely to lead to an election for his Sherborne West seat on Dorset Council in the coming weeks.

He had been criticised by Conservative councillors for moving away from the area, whilst retaining his Dorset seat which he has held since spring 2019.

In a statement Mr Hall says it came as a surprise to be elected in Exmouth and it had always been his intention to step down from his Dorset Council role before next May’s elections. He will now resign formally at the next council meeting.

He said: “I had agreed to stand as a paper candidate in Exmouth ahead of a move to the town. However last week Exmouth, like much of the UK, voted overwhelmingly to reject the nasty politics of the Conservative Party and I now find myself a councillor on two different councils. It had always been my intention to step down from Dorset Council at the elections next year, but it isn’t fair to constituents in either place to try and do both jobs. So with great sadness I have decided to give up my Sherborne seat early.”

Leader of the Liberal Democrats on Dorset Council Nick Ireland paid tribute to Cllr Hall saying: “Exmouth’s gain is very much Dorset’s loss. Matt has been an outstanding councillor for Dorset and is a prime example of why electing Liberal Democrats is good for local communities. He works tirelessly for residents of Sherborne and a raft of local charities. He champions local causes and is always available to help constituents with their problems.

“Matt will be sorely missed by his fellow councillors and by the many hundreds of Sherborne residents he has personally helped. We look forward to putting forward a candidate who can carry on his good work.”

Matt Hall added: “I am extremely sad to be leaving Sherborne. It has been my home for over 20 years and I’ve been a councillor here in many different guises for 12 years. I am enormously proud of what I and my fellow Liberal Democrats have achieved; from dealing with blocked drains, trip hazards and potholes, to getting funding from the various councils to help fund highway improvements and supporting local groups and organisations.

“The success of Liberal Democrat candidates across the country in last week’s local elections shows that people are tired of being taken for granted and want elected officials who are going to work for them rather than themselves.”

Virgin Orbit: Branson’s space mission ends after rocket failure

Sir Richard Branson’s rocket company Virgin Orbit has shut down, just months after a major mission failure.

Where now for Cornwall’s space port? – Owl

By Peter Hoskins www.bbc.co.uk

The firm’s converted jet and leases on properties have been sold for $36m (£29m), just a fraction of the $3.7bn the company was valued at in 2021.

In March, Virgin Orbit said it would make most of its workforce redundant after failing to secure new investment.

The California-based firm filed for bankruptcy protection in the US early last month.

It came just weeks after the company paused operations in an apparent attempt to shore up its finances.

Earlier this year, a Virgin Orbit rocket failed to complete the first ever satellite launch from UK soil.

Virgin Orbit’s headquarters rocket factory and equipment were bought by rival start-up, Rocket Lab, for $16.1m.

Its converted Boeing 747 jet, called Cosmic Girl, was sold for $17m to aerospace firm Stratolaunch.

Another space company, Launcher Inc, bought Virgin Orbit’s launch site and lease in the Mojave desert for $2.7m.

Virgin Orbit, which was founded in 2017, never turned a profit as a public company.

It developed rockets to carry small satellites and is part of Sir Richard’s business empire, which includes airline Virgin Atlantic and space tourism company Virgin Galactic.

The company’s LauncherOne rocket reached space but fell short of reaching its target orbit.

The mission was billed as a milestone for UK space exploration. It had been hoped it would mark a major step forward to fulfilling an ambition to turn the country into a global player – from manufacturing satellites to building rockets and creating new spaceports.

King Charles and Prince William face fight over taxpayer funds on Dartmoor

Much of Dartmoor, and in particular the areas owned by the duchy are classed as a site of special scientific interest (SSSI). These special areas are designated because they are nationally important for wildlife, and in need of protection. Yet despite 10 years of environmental subsidies much of the land is still in poor condition, according to the latest surveys by Natural England, the most recent of which were undertaken in 2019. Some date back to 2011.

King Charles and Prince William could be dragged into a bitter fight over £13m of taxpayer funds paid over the past decade for nature restoration on Dartmoor national park.

Helena Horton www.theguardian.com

The funds have partly been paid to tenants farming land in the national park that is owned by the Duchy of Cornwall, a land and property estate controlled by the heir to the throne.

The subsidies were intended to help preserve and restore Dartmoor as an important national wildlife ecosystem. Yet despite the government funding little improvement has been seen.

Last month the government regulator, Natural England, stepped in and threatened to stop the subsidy payments unless farmers significantly reduced livestock grazing, a key contributor to the degradation of the land. This controversial move caused a local and parliamentary backlash, which has thrown into question the regulator’s powers.

Some have criticised the duchy, suggesting that Prince William, and previously the king, as the landowners are ultimately responsible.

The duchy has developed a plan with farmers to help improve the land and recently committed £700,000 to land restoration. But the area is failing on virtually every government environmental measure.

Much of Dartmoor, and in particular the areas owned by the duchy are classed as a site of special scientific interest (SSSI). These special areas are designated because they are nationally important for wildlife, and in need of protection. Yet despite 10 years of environmental subsidies much of the land is still in poor condition, according to the latest surveys by Natural England, the most recent of which were undertaken in 2019. Some date back to 2011.

Most worryingly, peat bogs on the SSSIs are in terrible condition. These bogs are a significant store of carbon in the UK as well as being invaluable for wildlife.

Much of the damage to the environment has been put down to increased grazing. Though grazing is a traditional part of life on Dartmoor, in recent years there has been an increase in animals stocked on the land, stripping vegetation from the peat bogs which cover the national park, according to Natural England.

Wes Smyth, Natural England’s area manager for Dartmoor, said landowners who did not improve the areas they looked after, would cease to get government funding unless they changed their ways.

He said: “It’s become clear over the recent years that the relationship between farming, nature and other impacts like climate change are not in balance and nature is declining in a way that may jeopardise the huge value that Dartmoor brings to local communities and visitors.

“Despite the protection these designations provided, and the huge investment of public money in agri-environment schemes, wildlife has declined. Breeding populations of golden plover, red grouse and ring ouzels have now gone or are on the verge of being lost.

“Dartmoor’s precious peatlands, its blanket bogs on the highest ground and mires in the valley bottoms are still suffering from historic management affecting their ability to store carbon and regulate river flows.”

The lack of improvement led Natural England to write to tenant farmers saying subsidy payments would be stopped unless they reduced their livestock on Dartmoor. At stake is more than £1.3m paid annually to farmers to improve the condition of peatland and plants as well as increase numbers of rare birds on the SSSI.

As the largest landowner Prince William could find himself dragged into the debate over these payments. Some of the farmers who received letters are tenants of the duchy.

Campaigners believe that it is ultimately the responsibility of the duchy to ensure tenant farmers are deploying farming methods that give the land the best chance to recover.

A spokesperson for the Duchy of Cornwall said: “As a responsible landowner who prioritises sustainability, we work closely with our partners on Dartmoor – particularly our tenants, the wider farming community, conservation groups, Dartmoor National Park Authority and Natural England – on the management and condition of the commons.”

Environmental campaigner and Devon resident Guy Shrubsole said: “King Charles and Prince William have both spoken passionately about environmental issues for decades, but their rhetoric hasn’t always been matched by action when it comes to their Duchy of Cornwall landholdings. Large swathes of duchy land on Dartmoor have the right climate for temperate rainforest, but only tiny fragments now remain. Prince William has supported the restoration of temperate rainforest in the Pacific north-west – let’s hope he now does so on his own estate.”

Tom Usher, of the Dartmoor Preservation Association, added: “The Duchy of Cornwall are in a unique position to show leadership by properly managing Dartmoor’s degraded SSSIs. They have a duty to the land they claim to care for and the people that live and work there.

“To fix it the duchy needs to have tightly and regularly monitored outcomes that are key to success. The collaborative approach of the last decade with farmers and those that work the land should continue and now also involve local community groups.”

Breaking: No surprises as EDDC continues as an inclusive, progressive, council

EDDC chooses continuity in leader, deputy leader and most cabinet appointments

At this evening’s annual meeting the following were elected unanimously as:

Chair, Cllr. Eleanor Rylance (LibDem)

Vice Chair Cllr Sam Hawkins (Cranbrook Independent)

Leader Cllr Paul Arnott (LibDem)

Having been elected he then chose Cllr Paul Hayward (Independent) to continue as his deputy.

In a short address Paul Arnott outlined his intention to continue giving priority to three topics::

Homes

The environment

The East Devon economy with emphasis on sustainability

He announced nine cabinet members who included eight from the retiring cabinet :

Climate Action Cllr Marianne Rixon (LibDem)

Coast, Country and environment Cllr Geoff Jung (LibDEm)

Council and Corporate coordination Cllr John Loudon (Independent)

Democracy and  Transparency Cllr Sarah Jackson (Independent)

Tourism, leisure, sport, culture Cllr Nick Hookway (LibDem)

Economy Cllr Matt Hall (LibDem) (new cabinet member)

Finance and assets Cllr Paul Hayward (Independent)

Strategic Planning Cllr Olly Davey (Green)

Sustainable homes and communities Cllr Dan Ledger (Independen)

Assistant portfolio holders will be announced in due course when the newly elected members have settled in.

Breaking: Boris Johnson ditches government-appointed lawyers for Covid inquiry

What a waste of taxpayer money – Owl

Boris Johnson will no longer work with government-appointed lawyers for the Covid inquiry, after he was referred to the police over further potential rule breaches during the pandemic.

www.bbc.co.uk 

Allies of the former PM said he had lost all confidence in the Cabinet Office, which handed over the material.

The Cabinet Office said officials had been obliged to disclose the documents under civil service rules.

No 10 said neither ministers nor the PM were not involved in the decision.

East Devon Annual Council today 6.00 pm, The Ocean, Exmouth  

The outgoing council was controlled for the past three years by a Democratic Alliance comprising members of the Green Party, the Liberal Democrats, the Independent East Devon Alliance, and an Independent who came together for form a new political group.

Will such a  “coalition of the willing” be formed amongst the new council members?

We will discover tonight.

This meeting is being recorded by EDDC for subsequent publication on the Council’s website and will be streamed live to the Council’s Youtube Channel at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmNHQruge3LVI4hcgRnbwBw

Seaside town ‘hollowed out’ as residents ‘driven from homes’ by rowdy tourists

Furious residents say they are being driven from their seaside town by holiday rentals that have “hollowed out” their community.

Alice Clifford www.independent.co.uk

People living in Whitstable have expressed frustration that homes previously filled by locals are now being used by visitors throwing loud parties, blocking driveways, taking up vital parking spaces and leaving the streets covered in rubbish.

With long-term neighbours being replaced with a constant stream of unfamiliar faces, people are feeling as though the town has been ripped of its sense of community.

Those desperate to find a solution attended a meeting last Friday to discuss ways to regulate the industry, hosted by members of Canterbury City Council’s Green Party in a bid to find a way to balance the issues with the benefits of tourism.

One woman said she “really struggles as a resident of this town” as working from home has become an impossible task with constant noise.

Another added: “People don’t care where they park – it’s cheaper to pay a fine than pay for a day’s parking.”

People applauded when one local said “there is no longer a sense of community”.

One resident, Jonathan Hollow, added: “I have lived in Whitstable since 2006. I’m right in the centre. When I moved in I had long-term neighbours each side of my terraced house. Now one side is a second home, and the other side is a holiday rental property for short-term lets.

“The owner of the holiday rental property has been very considerate in response to the requests I have made, but he is not there all the time. He can’t legislate for the behaviour of everyone who passes through his house.

“You do get more noise – confusion with people knocking on your door seeing if you can help them with lost keys. Sometimes there are problems with bins being left out on a street.

“All these are incidental nuisances, but generally having this feeling where you know fewer of your neighbours is resulting in a deterioration in the life of the community in Whitstable.

“We do need tourists but we need to find a happy way of living with tourism. I would like to see Canterbury City Council immediately introduce a voluntary code of practice which owners can sign up to that sets high standards for neighbourliness.”

As it stands, a property can be used as a short-term holiday let with no notice or permission needed.

One of the possible regulations discussed was making it so that people hoping to convert future properties into short-term lets have to apply for change-of-use planning permission.

This is something the government is considering, with a new planning use class created for lets not used as a sole or main home.

But it would only apply to new hosts and not existing second homes already used as holiday lets.

Sophie Williams, 52, welcomed the idea. She said: “Having a holiday let next door, I didn’t initially know it was happening. There was a person knocking at my door because he couldn’t get in. That was one of the first incidents I dealt with.

“It’s not always parties late at night, although last New Year’s Eve a party went on until 8am.”

She added: “I like to sit and read in my garden and their garden has been done up beautifully for barbecues so there are garden parties three times a week in the summer. It’s upsetting and makes me not want to live there.

“I think they should be paying council tax because they have taken away a property that should be residential.”

According to rough data obtained by Councillor Clare Turnbull, Canterbury City Council could be missing out on almost £500,000 of revenue.

This is because hundreds of holiday lets in Whitstable are not registered for council tax and don’t pay business rates either.

At the meeting, people voted in favour of introducing council tax for second homes and owners of holiday lets. Some feel the tax should even be doubled for people with second homes – something councils running tourist hotspots across the country are considering.

Limiting the number of nights each year a property can be rented out for was also suggested among other ideas.

While welcoming regulations, resident Jo Taylor feels they need to be tougher, saying: “This is not a witch hunt. We still want people to come here for their holidays but it needs to be a nice place for residents too.

“We have quite a few holiday lets down our road and people are coming and going all the time. You don’t know who these people are. At least when you have neighbours you recognise who is who.

“Because there are so many holiday lets and not enough family homes, you don’t see as many people in the winter so the community is losing out massively.

“Lots of the shops are shut in the winter, the restaurants are closed, the people in the shops take less money because we’re a seaside town and there are not as many people staying here.”

She added: “The regulations suggested are all a bit too ‘light touch’, they need to be more dynamic and forceful. The people who own the holiday lets need to be more accountable for what happens in them.

“We need to be able to know how many properties we are dealing with because we are saying all this, but we don’t know the full facts. I would like to see more meetings like this, so we can get an in-depth view on how we can get that balance.”

Another person, who asked to remain anonymous, said: “Holiday lets mean there are fewer rental properties for young people and families. The homes that are left, nobody local can afford because the rents sky-rocket with demand.

“People are moving further away just so they can afford to live.”

Rebecca Sewell from Tankerton runs the house-keeping business Halos and earns around 70 per cent of her income through holiday lets.

While she supports the industry, as a local she also welcomes regulations.

The 49-year-old said: “While I do have concerns about people having affordable homes to live in the area, I also have invested interest in holiday lets being here. The housekeeping jobs provide income for local people and for the town. They support women in particular back into work after having children.

“Holiday lets have driven prices of the rental market up, but the flip side is it does provide work. I can see both sides which is why I came to the meeting to see if there is a way to balance that.”

It wasn’t just concerned neighbours who attended.

One man who lets out his spare room to tourists, while still living in his home, also welcomed regulations. But he felt they should be on a different scale for set-ups like his.

Most people agreed these types of lets are more sustainable and cause less problems for the town. As a result, the majority agreed regulations for these types of lets should not have to follow such strict rules.

The meeting was held following an online consultation sent to residents in September asking for their views.

While emotions were high from people desperate to find a solution, there was also a sense of hope that balance could be found. Residents’ responses and views on the proposed regulations will be combined for the next stage of the consultation locally and nationally.

Cllr Turnbull said: “People made strong contributions to the ideas behind the registration scheme and the change of use and regulations. It’s a massively emotional issue and I think the main point was it’s about the community.

“What was a close knit, really vibrant town, is becoming hollowed out by holiday lets taking over people’s homes that were habited by young families before with children going to local schools.

“It is driving people out of the town which is desperately sad. People who want to stay in the town that have always lived here can’t find rental properties or they can’t afford to buy because the prices have gone up so high.

“The council is due to set up a working group on this issue to recognise this is an important issue in Whitstable. I’m going to make sure they deliver on this working group and they take the issue seriously.”

Labour councillor Pip Hazelton, recently appointed as the new-look city council’s cabinet member for housing, said: “We want to see as much affordable accommodation made available to local families as possible.

“We do understand we need to balance that with tourism. We shall be setting up a cross-party politically balanced working group to look into exactly how we will do this as soon as possible. This will be an opportunity to delve into the complexities, government guidelines and legislations, while looking at the needs of our district.

“There isn’t one simple answer. What we don’t want is communities hollowed out and destroyed by holiday lets. People are seeing homes as an investment to be exploited rather than homes for local people.”

The Rooftop Revolution Report – CPRE

CPRE has published groundbreaking new research into the true potential for generating the electricity we need from rooftop solar. 

Our report shows the opportunities are huge. Putting solar panels on new buildings and over car parks alone could generate nearly the same amount of clean electricity as 10 new nuclear power stations.

And if we make use of low-cost opportunities for solar panels on the rooftops of large buildings like warehouses, the evidence shows that 60% of the solar panels our country needs can be sited on rooftops. 

But if we don’t make use of our rooftops, solar panels could swallow up 180,000 hectares of our countryside – an area larger than the size of Greater London! 

Executive summary 

The accelerating climate emergency poses the single greatest threat to the countryside. Without urgent action, iconic features of our landscapes, including English oak trees and our rare chalk streams, could be lost from many places, throwing the survival of much of our best loved wildlife into doubt. 

At the same time, the increased risk of severe flooding caused by climate change threatens both rural communities and our food security. Recent research by CPRE, the countryside charity, shows that more than 60% of England’s finest agricultural land is within areas at the highest risk of flooding. For these and many other reasons, it is essential for the countryside that over the coming decade we cut our carbon emissions. Critically, we need to complete the transition from reliance on fossil fuels to a new era of renewable energy. 

Yet, despite the urgent need to exploit the best opportunities to generate the renewable energy our country needs, we have a vast and largely untapped resource: roofs. Along with surface car parks, roofs provide space to generate solar-powered electricity, very close to where it is needed. Making the best possible use of solar on roofs and car parks is a solution that will enjoy almost universal support. 

By contrast, greenfield ground-mounted schemes done poorly can cause harm, provide little benefit to rural communities and become bogged down in contentious planning disputes. This briefing looks both at the potential of rooftop renewables and at the interventions needed to deliver them. 

To better understand the full potential of rooftop solar energy in this country, CPRE commissioned experts at the University College London (UCL) Energy Institute to undertake an independent review of the land use implications of meeting targets, drawn from a series of well-established net zero greenhouse gas emission scenarios. Using this data, UCL has produced assessments of the total energy that could be generated from solar photovoltaic (PV) panels on rooftops across England as well as the land area that may be required for wind, ground-mounted solar and biomass in England in net zero scenarios. 

Key findings

• Although ground-mounted solar projects will be needed in the short term to hit national decarbonisation, installing solar panels on new buildings, existing large warehouse rooftops and other land such as car parks, could provide at least 40-50 gigawatts (GW) of low carbon electricity, contributing more than half of the total national target of 70GW of solar energy by 2035.

• Longer term to 2050, and with further investment, there is potential for up to 117GW of low carbon electricity to be generated from roofs and other developed spaces, reducing the need for greenfield ground-mounted solar in the medium to long term. 

• Meeting national solar energy targets through ground-mounted schemes alone could require between 0.9-1.4% of the land in England, covering as much as 1,800 square kilometres/ 180,000 hectares of our countryside – an area larger than the size of Greater London (157,000ha)

Are debt levels falling or just forecast to rise less steeply?

Jermy Hunt slammed for using statistics, and confusing words, to imply debt is falling when it isn’t.

Worrying trait in a Chancellor, but he is a Conservative. – Owl

The official statistics watchdog has reprimanded the chancellor, Jeremy Hunt, after he claimed public debt levels would fall in the coming years, when in fact they are simply forecast to rise less steeply than previously expected.

Peter Walker www.theguardian.com 

The head of the UK Statistics Authority (UKSA), Sir Robert Chote, said the watchdog’s regulatory arm had spoken to Treasury officials to warn them about accuracy after a complaint by the Labour MP Dame Angela Eagle over a tweet the chancellor sent on 25 April.

Saying the government had “made progress” on the public finances, Hunt wrote: “By 2027-28, headline debt levels are reduced by £53.7 billion.”

Eagle, a former Treasury minister who sits on the Treasury committee, wrote to Chote, noting that the Office for Budget Responsibility forecasts indicate that public debt will rise between now and 2027-28, including a £90bn increase from 2026-27 alone.

She said Hunt appeared to be referring to a fall in the OBR’s current projection for headline debt in 2027-28 compared with the same forecast in last year’s autumn statement. Eagle wrote: “I am concerned that government ministers are using misleading statistics publicly regarding the economy, and believe it is critical that figures used are accurate.”

In a reply, Chote said Treasury officials had confirmed this was what the tweet referred to: a reduction in the size of the forecast increase of debt, not a fall in the debt itself.

“As you suggest, some readers of the tweet may have assumed that the chancellor was referring to the forecast change in public sector net debt between the last full financial year and 2027-28,” he wrote.

“Greater clarity and context would have avoided this confusion. The Office for Statistics Regulation [the regulatory arm of the UKSA] has therefore spoken with officials at HM Treasury to emphasise the importance of consistently adopting a transparent and accessible approach to communicating statistics and data in line with our guidance on intelligent transparency.”

Eagle told the Guardian: “As the statistics authority has confirmed, this government has a persistently troubled relationship with the truth – one that is becoming increasingly obvious if you read the fine print.

“It is incredibly disappointing to see the chancellor resorting to using such misleading statistics in a tweet of all places – a new low for the fourth chancellor in a year.”

The Treasury confirmed Hunt’s tweet had referred to the changing forecast for the debt increase, and that it had noted Chote’s points and would take any necessary action.

South West Water under investigation over leaks and usage figures

The owner of South West Water is being investigated by the industry regulator over whether it accurately reported leaks and figures showing how much water is used by its customers.

In August last year Owl reported on how SWW didn’t make it easy to work out what their leakage rate was. It now turns out Owl is not alone.

Joanna Partridge www.theguardian.com 

Pennon Group, which owns South West Water and Bristol Water Group, told its shareholders that Ofwat has announced an investigation into the company’s operational performance during 2021 and 2022.

Ofwat sets performance targets for water companies on leakage and “per capita consumption”, or the amount of water used by each household. It assesses companies annually and can issue penalties or rewards, depending on how they perform.

The regulator said the penalty could be up to 10% of a company’s turnover. Last year, Pennon brought in revenues of £792m.

Last November, the regulator said it was delaying a decision on whether South West Water was moving towards meeting its own targets on reducing leaks, as it tried to understand how the firm had calculated its performance figures.

Ofwat said it would now conduct a “thorough investigation” into South West Water, which supplies to customers in Cornwall and Devon, as well as small parts of Dorset and Somerset.

David Black, the chief executive of Ofwat, said: “We are committed to holding companies to account for performance and for sharing timely, accurate, and complete data with us and their customers. We want to ensure that is the case here.

“A thorough investigation will now be carried out and we will provide updates in due course on our findings and whether there is any further action Ofwat needs to take.”

Shares in Pennon Group, which is listed on the FTSE 100, slid by about 3% on Tuesday on news of the investigation.

Pennon said its operational performance data is “subject to rigorous assurance processes which include independent checks and balances carried out by external technical auditor”.

The company said it would work “openly and constructively” with Ofwat during its investigation.

Water companies are under increasing pressure to reduce the amount of water lost through leaks, particularly at a time when the government is also aiming to lower the amount of water used by households.

A fifth of the public water supply is lost through leaks in the network, according to the government’s “plan for water” which was released in April, part of its attempts to reach cleaner and more plentiful supplies in the UK.

The government said it made tackling leaks a priority for Ofwat in 2017, although water companies in England and Wales lost more than 1tn litres of water through leaky pipes in 2021-22, according to the industry’s most recent figures.

The figure is equivalent to filling 426,875 Olympic swimming pools or enough water to fill Lake Windermere three-and-a-half times.

South West Water has previously been investigated by the regulator along with five other water suppliers, as part of an investigation into the dumping of raw sewage, a topic which has prompted public anger over pollution in the sea and rivers.

Last week, water companies pledged to triple investment in the sewage system in England to reduce pollution but the move was criticised for passing the £10bn bill for investment, which should have been carried out years ago, on to customers.

Sidmouth’s MP ‘very sorry’ former boss Raab will stand down at next election

Surprise, surprise, Simon’s sorry to be losing his “top cover” – maybe he is feeling a bit exposed?

Blow on the winds of change! – Owl

sidmouth.nub.news 

Conservative MP for East Devon Simon Jupp has said he is “very sorry” to see Dominic Raab decide to stand down as an MP at the next election.

The announcement reported in The Daily Telegraph comes a month after Raab quit his role as deputy prime minister after an inquiry upheld some bullying complaints made against him.

Simon Jupp, who was a special advisor to Raab when he was foreign secretary in 2019, said: “I’m very sorry to see Dominic Raab decide to stand down at the next election.

“He was a brilliant boss when I worked for him at the Foreign Office.

“Always across the detail, he knew more than most in the room about the topic under discussion.

“Another big loss from Parliament.”

Raab has been MP for Esher and Walton in Surrey since 2010.

Dominic Raab to stand down as MP in next election after resigning over bullying scandal

Simon Jupp’s political master to stand down at the election. 

Simon was a SpAd (special adviser) to Dominic Raab (reporting to Dominic Cummings as well) for six months before being selected as the Conservative candidate for East Devon in 2019.

Time to remove this from his CV? – Owl

The Surrey constituency, which Mr Raab won by just 2,743 votes at the 2019 election, is a key target for the Liberal Democrats at the next national poll.

Sophie Wingate www.independent.co.uk

Dominic Raab, who resigned from Cabinet last month after a bullying inquiry, will stand down as an MP at the next general election.

The former deputy prime minister and justice secretary confirmed his exit plans to the PA news agency on Monday night.

He quit Rishi Sunak’s Cabinet last month over bullying allegations from civil servants.

An independent investigation by Adam Tolley KC found he had acted in an intimidating and aggressive way with officials in behaviour that could have amounted to bullying.

Mr Raab will not contest his Esher and Walton seat, which he has held since 2010, at the next election, due by January 2025.

The Surrey constituency, which Mr Raab won by just 2,743 votes at the 2019 election, is a key target for the Liberal Democrats at the next national poll.

He joins a slew of senior Tories, including former chancellor Sajid Javid and ex-environment secretary George Eustice, announcing their exit plans amid a polling slump.

Former health secretary Matt Hancock, who was a Conservative until he lost the whip over his I’m A Celebrity appearance, and Dehenna Davison, seen as a rising star in the Tory party, are also among around 30 Tories to be quitting the Commons.

In a letter to the chairman of his local Conservative Association, seen by the Telegraph, Mr Raab reportedly cited concerns about the pressure on his family as being behind his decision.

“I have become increasingly concerned over the last few years about the pressure the job has placed on my young family,” he wrote in the letter dated May 19, according to the newspaper.

“I will continue to carry out all my responsibilities to my constituents, and provide every support in campaigning, so that we win here next year – which I am confident we can do under this Prime Minister’s leadership.”

Mr Raab was sent to the backbenches after Mr Tolley’s report concluded he had engaged in an “abuse or misuse of power” that “undermines or humiliates” while he was foreign secretary. He was also found to have been intimidating to staff by criticising “utterly useless” and “woeful” work while justice secretary.

The senior lawyer led a five-month investigation into eight formal complaints about Mr Raab’s conduct as Brexit secretary and foreign secretary, and in his previous tenure leading the Ministry of Justice.

Though he stopped short of describing the conduct as bullying, Mr Tolley’s findings were consistent with what he said would amount to the offence under the ministerial code.

Mr Raab stayed true to his pledge to step down from Cabinet if any bullying claim was upheld.

But the karate black belt went down fighting, criticising the “Kafkaesque saga” and alleging the inquiry had “set a dangerous precedent” by setting a “low” threshold for bullying.

The 49-year-old said he had been warned that “unionised officials” were targeting him, in a widely-criticised tirade that raised concerns about a breakdown of trust between ministers and civil servants.

His departure spells the end of a colourful political career which left him no stranger to controversy, as well as his ambitions of one day taking over in No 10.

Mr Raab, who made an unsuccessful run to replace Theresa May as Tory leader in 2019, was demoted from foreign secretary after accusations of being “missing in action” by being on holiday in Crete during the 2021 Afghanistan evacuation.

Planning applications validated by EDDC for week beginning 8 May

England’s water companies: a badly broken system 

“There are two main options for improving England’s spectacularly broken system: empower regulators to restrict financial engineering and prevent companies that load firms with debt from entering this market, or nationalise the water supply. The government seems unwilling to do either.”

Guardian Editorial www.theguardian.com 

The revelation should anger all who care about England’s rivers and beaches. Two decades ago, ministers were warned about private equity firms buying up water companies. In a briefing prepared for Britain’s competition regulator prior to the takeover of Southern Water, researchers raised the alarm that private equity-owned water companies would become “impossible” to regulate. Despite the 20-year transparency rule, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has not released the briefing. Its existence was uncovered by this newspaper. Though its full contents remain secret, its implications are clear: ministers were alerted to the devastating impact that this industry could have on England’s water supply, but they chose not to act.

Since then, a tide of effluent has polluted England’s rivers. Following the privatisation of water companies in 1989, owners have enriched themselves while neglecting infrastructure and dumping vast quantities of untreated sewage. As investors have loaded water companies with debt, they have continued to pay dividends to their shareholders, which totalled £1.4bn last year. The public, meanwhile, have shouldered the costs. Water bills have risen. Last week, the industry apologised for these sewage spills and pledged to invest £10bn in infrastructure – to be paid for by increases in customer bills. Ruth Kelly, the former Labour cabinet minister who is head of the industry’s trade body, Water UK, said more should have been done to address the spillages. She was silent on the subject of dividend payments.

The main line of defence for consumers is supposed to be Ofwat. Yet water companies have run rings around the regulator. Its rules are premised on a version of capitalism that no longer exists. When it was founded in 1989, England’s water suppliers were listed on the stock market, allowing anybody to buy shares in this public resource. Today, most of them have been bought up by investment funds that do not face the same disclosure requirements. Opacity has shielded their finances from scrutiny. Since 2015, water companies have been required to demonstrate their “financial resilience”, and Ofwat will now prevent negligent ones from paying out dividends. But the horse has already bolted, and many of the firms responsible for loading these companies with debt have already moved on.

The regulation of England’s water suppliers is grounded in the illusion that it is possible to promote competition in a marketplace of natural monopolies. A narrow focus on competition and prices has led Ofwat to largely ignore other crucial issues such as the environment and the cost to taxpayers, and to overlook the risks posed by financial engineering. In 2007, for example, it credulously took the view that firms’ capital structures (and by implication their dividend payments) “are essentially a matter for companies and the markets”. Meanwhile, the CMA, which has been urged to do more to prevent private equity buyouts, has no remit to investigate these issues. Neither regulator was designed with this industry in mind, and both now find themselves outmanoeuvred by its tricks.

Solving these problems requires change from the top. There are two main options for improving England’s spectacularly broken system: empower regulators to restrict financial engineering and prevent companies that load firms with debt from entering this market, or nationalise the water supply. The government seems unwilling to do either.