Economic Development Manager slips seamlessly away

Only a perfectly timed question from Cllr Claire Wright to Deputy CEO Richard Cohen, most appropriately at yesterday’s Overview and Scrutiny (O&S) Committee meeting, obliged Mr Cohen to mention that it happened to be Nigel Harrison’s last day at the office that very same day.
Mr Harrison was of course due to be the Lead Officer at a special O&S sub-committee, the so-called Business TAFF, although he had kept out of public view since the Telegraph’s Councillors for hire story broke (March 2013), and his expected resignation confirmed last month, came as no surprise to many. See http://eastdevonalliance.org/2014/09/24/lead-officer-of-stalled-business-taff-to-quietly-disappear/

So it seems that the fledgling Task and Finish Forum (TAFF) charged by the O&S Committee to carry out ‘an in-depth study’ on the relationship between EDDC and what was called the East Devon Business Forum (EDBF), has had its wings clipped yet again.The TAFF has been grounded for well over a year as the police investigation into key witness ex-councillor Graham Brown has dragged on. Now that another key player, the Economic Development Manager, has melted away, along with the Monitoring Officer in question, and of course the EDBF itself, will the Business TAFF ever get to fly?

More on the subject at http://eastdevonalliance.org/2014/08/04/eddc-ministry-of-magic/

For urgent attention of EDDC’s Overview and Scrutiny Chair

Tim Wood seems to have been misled on two matters which cropped up last night at the O&S committee which he chairs.

1. The first was in response to this question from Marianne Rixson of East Devon Alliance :
‘At the Newton Poppleford Parish Council (30th Sept), Councillor Potter reported on a recent meeting of the Local Government Association. He quoted a government minister as saying that there would be no district councils left in 10 yrs’ time.
Given this prediction, will your scrutiny committee need to urgently explore the possibility that the millions of pounds dedicated to the Knowle move will prove to be a total waste of taxpayers’ money?
Could you please begin straightaway by asking Richard Cohen tonight to tell you how much it would cost to refurbish the present purpose-built Knowle offices, funded by the possible sale of part or whole of the former hotel building on the site?’

Tim Wood mumbled the reply that he believed Cllr Potter had been misquoted. Those who attended the Newton Poppleford Parish Council meeting, including 20 or so local residents and various East Devon Alliance members, heard and were astonished by Cllr Potter’s statement. Cllr Tim Wood was not at that meeting, so would he kindly check the recording of it?

2.The second was about comments made last week regarding the weakness of EDDC’s Scrutiny Committee, when EDDC’s Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) and Chief Executive, Mark Williams was summoned to a Parliamentary Select Committee unhappy with his ERO performance. Richard Thurlow ,Chair of Save Our Sidmouth, requested that the comments be addressed by tighter scrutiny of council officers.
Tim Wood read out a prepared (by whom?)statement to the effect that this was no concern of his O&S Committee, but purely a matter between the ERO and the Electoral Commission. Would he kindly check the LGA link below, which clearly states:

“Committees are able to investigate any issue which affects the local area, or the area’s inhabitants, whether or not it is the direct responsibility of the council’s Cabinet.”

See: s9F(2)(d) and (e), Local Government Act 2000, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/20/schedule/2/part/1/enacted

Cllr Wood and his O&S Committee members might like to re-read and reflect on what was said about them http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/political-and-constitutional-reform-committee/voter-engagement-in-the-uk/oral/14118.html

Council watchdog toothless

EDA followers will remember our report of the O&S Committe resolve made in January this year : http://sidmouthindependentnews.wordpress.com/2014/01/31/council-watchdog-shows-its-teeth-over-ballooning-costs-of-the-knowle-move/
Eight months on, there are signs that the Council watchdog has been undergoing obediency training…..
An apparently tamed Overview and Scrutiny Chair Tim Wood cast a deciding vote to  accept an unelected council officers’ report last night. He made almost no contribution to his committee’s debate on the uncertainties, omissions,  and setbacks in Richard Cohen’s latest update on EDDC office relocation, except to ask the approximate size of floorspace that a revamped EDDC would require.Richard Cohen’s answer: 3,300 sq metres.
How does this compare with the floorspace of the purpose built Knowle offices? We’ll remind readers on a following link to be posted shortly.

For full account of last night’s meeting, see http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/eddc_scrutiny_cttee_votes_against_holding_cabinet_to_account_which_is_its_j

Skypark: 5 acres being landscaped

Sounds lovely doesn’t it? Developer St Modwyn has announcec that Skypark is to have 5 acres with a tree-lined avenue, grassland and hedges with “exercise stations” and woodland.

But one question arises: would this have happened if Skypark had managed to get more tenants or is it landscaping over the cracks? Or landscaping to hide what is behind the hedges?

And no amount of landscaping will alter the fact that the development is sandwiched between a main road and an airport runway, with a gas production unit and a 24 hour parcel delivery and collection service as its main tenants so far.

More on “consultation” – this time in the extension to the extension of Cranbrook

The developer exhibition for the extension to the extension of Cranbrook took place at the Younghayes community centre in Cranbrook on Thursday 16 October from mid-day to 6 pm.

There was very little advance notice of the exhibition (most people heard about it only the day before on the local news) and those hours would have excluded many working people from seeing it and asking searching questions about the “suggestions” the developers have put forward about the infrastructure that MIGHT support the extra dwellings.

Surely this cannot be the only “public consultation” on these plans?

Oh, and do these new houses count towards the Local Plan unlike earlier ones? And what will be the difference between affordable housing promised and delivered?

Local Health service “consultation”

We have been told by our local health group that we are being “consulted” on widespread changes to community care, particularly community hospitals.

Then almost immediately we hear that in Ottery there is to be a “temporary” stroke unit
http://www.northdevonhealth.nhs.uk/2014/10/trust-to-centralise-community-stroke-rehabilitation-services-in-ottery-st-mary/

and Axminster’s inpatient beds are to close over winter and nurses will be transferred to Seaton

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Hospital-beds-Axminster-set-close-relocate-Seaton/story-23207587-detail/story.html

The so-called “consultation” document did not include either of these plans nor did they include costings of ANY of the various other alternatives in their report.

So what exactly ARE we being consulted about? And is it worth the paper it is written on?

“(Merely) noting a report has no place on Scrutiny”, says Independent Cllr Roger Giles

But despite strong and specific criticism tonight, by several Councillors and the members of the public, of Richard Cohen’s controversial update on Knowle office relocation, the Overview & Scrutiny Committee Chair, Tim Wood and others voted …to note  the report!!

More on tonight’s O&S meeting to follow.

Harry Potter, Darth Vader and elephants: last night’s “full” council meeting

Halloween

 

Elephants and Dark Forces rampaged around the room at EDDC’s first full council since July last night and  the public address system squealed and howled as if possessed by Harry Potter’s Dementors (or perhaps by the elephants).

The man with the screwdriver on the night was the Chief Executive himself, but his best fiddlings with an array of knobs could not prevent speeches from the dais sound like Darth Vader (mixed movie metaphors here surely?) summoning those from the Dark Side of the Sid Valley and beyond. Or was it a protest on the part of the elephants because they were missing the dulcet tones of unusually absent Leader Paul Diviani? Maybe see if one of those miraculously recruited 25 new canvassers knows a good sparks before the next meeting, Mark.

Longest-serving councillor Douglas Hull did his best to deliver the devastating news he had just received in the previous hour that Axminster Hospital is to lose all its overnight beds, but for some reason fellow Axminsterite and Chairman of the Council Graham Godbeer did everything he could to fluster him, made all the more menacing by the Darth Vader microphone set-up.

It was not dirty laundry Mr Godbeer or Leader-for-the-Night Andrew Moulding (also Axminster) wanted washing in public. Not when there were so many best kept village and long service awards to be dished out.  Whilst nobody would be grumpy enough to deny these good people due recognition, it does make it more soul destroying for this to be followed by bland supplementary answers to incisive written questions (and bland written answers) from Independent councillors sent in prior to the meeting.

The Independents shrewdly chose to reserve comment on many matters until the Leader’s chair can be filled again by Mr Diviani in person. Other Tory councillors must have known it was understudy night because we lost count of the apologies for absence. Unusual this for October – it is usually August when councillors are away from their posts. Perhaps Harry Potter or Darth Vader strike again and those unavailable were preparing themselves for Halloween by sharpening their fangs or preparing for an assault by the Dark Forces at a later date – like election day, perhaps.

Claire Wright did her best, yet again, to induce Deputy Exec Richard Cohen to give the people of East Devon the merest hint of a suspicion of a whiff of what his action resisting the Information Commissioner was currently costing us, but he seemed neither to have an estimate of what has been spent so far, nor any idea of what final cost would ultimately be. Not sure how this sits with public sector procurement policy?

Two questions from the public. Paul Arnott asked Mark Williams why he had not told Tim Wood, Chairman of the Overview and Scrutiny Committe, that he had been summoned before an all-party Select Committee at Westminster on electoral matters to explain why he had done no legally-obligatory door-to-door canvassing of the electorate in recent years. Mr Williams replied that he had taken “soundings”, and that’s why he hadn’t told Cllr Wood. “Soundings” lovely word that – should be the opposite of transparent.

Paul Freeman gave a forensic analysis, following up his lauded previous work, on why Mr Williams stated strategy at Westminster of relying on land-line phone canvassing might not be working in the era of the mobile phone, and mentioned again Cllr Eileen Wragg’s experience of finding house-after-house in one Exmouth street with unregistered voters (a fact brought to the attention of Mr Williams at the time).

The Tories did their best to fluster the redoubtable Mr Freeman with their usual background rumblings, and Chairman Godbeer tried to cut him off before his three minutes was up (is this a portent of things to come: cutting down the number of people who can speak and then gradually cutting down the time to nothing!) but they would do well to listen again to what he was saying. Not least, why South Somerset, where Mr Williams is also CEO, has discovered more than tens thousand extra voters in recent years by knocking on doors, while East Devon (CEO Mark Williams) has discovered none by not knocking on any doors.

Mark Williams thanked Mr Freeman him for being the cause of his being summoned to Westminster, where he said he was able to boast to the nation of a consistently more than 90% registration of the electorate. The elephant in the room here was, more than 90% of what, precisely? More than 90% of 100% of the electorate minus the ?% of missing voters. Difficult equation to process that one.

The other standout event was the presentation of a 900 strong petition to the council from the people of Seaton asking Helen Parr’s Development Management Committee not to approve any planning application for a site next to Tesco other than for the much promised and much needed hotel. The site is now being hunted down by McCarthy Stone as yet another retirement complex. An excellent speech from Seaton councillor Steve Williams, followed by the delivery of the petition, which will now be put before the DMC as a consideration before any application is debated, was probably the only moment when the electorate were actually heard in the entire pantomime.

elephants

Chickens, eggs and intrepid explorers

Our Electoral Registration Officer, Chief Executive Mark Williams, leads councillors to believe that he was summoned to the Parliamentary Select Committee on Voter Engagement to give them his personal words of wisdom, such is the efficiency with which he approaches his job – tearing up the rule book here, capturing telephone users there.  All in the name of saving us all money (if I lived in South Somerset where he follows a different path should I be begging him to tear up the rule book there too)?

And, why then, did he not blow his trumpet to his councillors when he was given the invitation rather than attempting to explain why he had kept it secret from them?  It would be a Press Officer’s Dream Press Release surely?  His excuse was that it is an entirely separate role and nothing to do with them.

He also believes he deserves praise for his “efficiency” in not sending out door-to-door canvassers to the more than 3,000 homes as yet unregistered, preferring instead telephone and internet methods of persuasion.

Just two small points:  to telephone someone who has not registered, you need their telephone number – how do you get it if they are under the radar or have private mobile phones only?  And what do you do if they are in one of the many homes in East Devon which does not have an internet service – something he admitted is at a lower level than average in the district?

Still, problem solved, in spite of this “efficiency” 25 canvassers will be trecking the wilds of East Devon shortly tracking down the “Refuseniks” (Mr Williams’ own word for those not yet registered).

Might we see a BBC adventure programme on how these intrepid explorers cross the wilds of the Blackdown Hills and the concrete jungle of Cranbrook?

Oh, and who is he responsible to in this role?  He says he is responsible to the Chief Executive (himself) yet in Parliament he corrected himself and said “I suppose councillors”.  Best get that straight, Mr Williams and tell us:  is the role and its performance within the remit of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee or is it not?

A one word answer, yes or no, will do.

The Cranbrook motto

as seen on a recent television feature:

Imagine, Discover, Believe

Would that be as in (un)Clean (un) Green and (un) Seen then?

Whatever you Imagine, you will be shocked by what you Discover, Believe me

Has Mark Williams’ ‘clerical error’ method of Electoral Registration worked?

Following Mark Williams’ statements to the Parliamentary Committee on Monday (13 Oct), the following Freedom of Information request has  been submitted to EDDC.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/conduct_of_the_may_22_2014_local?nocache=incoming-573167#incoming-573167

For a reminder of what was said when MPs questioned Mr Williams about his performance as East Devon’s Electoral Registration Officer, click here:  http://www.parliamentlive.tv/Main/Player.aspx?meetingId=16033

 

Performance of officers and councillors being much more heavily scrutinised and heads roll

In the past few days, the website Local Government Lawyer has run the following stories:

The current system of local monitoring of councillors is not working:

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=20383%3Awatchdog-warns-that-inappropriate-member-conduct-not-dealt-with-effectively&catid=59&Itemid=27

Councillor banned from serving in Cabinet for using false name to send council-friendly texts to local radio station:

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=20383%3Awatchdog-warns-that-inappropriate-member-conduct-not-dealt-with-effectively&catid=59&Itemid=27

The monitoring officer at Barnet Council has left the local authority in the wake of an investigation into how flawed reports were presented to council for decision.

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=20398%3Amonitoring-officer-leaves-barnet-with-westminster-head-of-legal-taking-interim-role&catid=59&Itemid=27

The shape of things to come?

Moral:  Have Monitoring Officers and other senior officers who really understand their jobs and are well qualified to do them,  get principles councillors and punish those who fall short and remove officers who do not meet the required standard.

 

And in other news …

Whilst we await our Chief Executive’s appearance at tonight’s council meeting, here is some other news that has been happening over the last few days:

.

Supermarkets – the new charity shops?

EDDC’s flagship regeneration policy of putting a supermarket in all seaside towns as close to the seaside as possible already looks to be a busted flush.

Tesco has just announced it will abandon its plan to build a superstore on the seafront in Margate to which Pickles had given a green light!

In an article in the business section of the Guardian we read:

“Pickles was criticised for backing the Tesco Margate scheme by the self-styled Queen of Shops Mary Portas, who said it showed the government was only paying “lip service” to the idea of reviving Britain’s high streets as the store would have a “catastrophic” impact on the town.

Margate was among the “Portas Pilot” towns which won £100,000 in funding to back new ideas to boost trade and refill empty shops on some of the UK’s most battered high streets.

Louise Oldfield, a local hotel owner who pushed for the judicial review, said she was shocked that Tesco had pulled out but it was good news for Margate. “We hope we can now move forward towards a more sustainable proposal for Margate. This proposal would have had a massive impact on the seafront,” she said.”

But what irrevocable damage has now been done to our seaside towns in East Devon? Certainly too late for Seaton.

Source: http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/oct/09/tesco-ditches-plans-build-superstore-margate-seafront

 

Cranbrook to double in size

In addition to the 6,000 homes already planned, developers are to submit plans for a further 1,500 homes. They also say they will build infrastructure but with still no Community Infrastructure Levy in place there is almost nothing in place to ensure that it happens.

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Cranbrook-set-double-size-new-proposals/story-23165420-detail/story.html

 

DIY repairs to Devon roads

Brush up those tarmacking skills – you are going to need them. Can’t wait to see DCC Councillor for Highways, Stuart Hughes, in a blue boiler suit:

At a time when the news tells us that Devon has some of the most dangerous country roads which have ten times more fatalities than motorways comes a call for local people to voluntarily maintain their own bits of road and fill in their own potholes.

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Campaign-launched-West-s-rural-roads-revealed/story-23063234-detail/story.html

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Road-wardens-pot-holes-cash-strapped-Devon-County/story-23089269-detail/story.html

 

Feniton developers issued with breach of conditions notice by EDDC

Finally developers Wain Homes are put under pressure to do what they were supposed to do:  build attenuation tanks for surface water run off which should have been done BEFORE homes were occupied.  At least six are now in occupation with no sign of the tanks

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/East-Devon-serves-Breach-Condition-Notice/story-23155904-detail/story.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Have we missed something?

That’s the headline  of ‘From the editor’s chair’ in today’s View from Sidmouth, (www.viewfromonline.co.uk  Tuesday, October 14th 2014, page 3).

The piece begins, ‘If I was a district councillor in East Devon I think I might be asking a pertinent question or two about why elected members had no previous knowledge that chief executive Mark Williams had been summoned before a Government select committee. ‘

It goes on, ..’I have some sympathy with the view expressed by experienced Ottery St Mary councillor Roger Giles when he said:”I would have thought that it might just have been of passing interest to the members of EDDC”, noting that in his 19 years of service he could not remember the chief executive being invited to meet with such an august body as the Political and Constitutional Reform Committee on Voter Engagement in the UK. ‘

Then, referring to the East Devon Alliance as ‘a pressure group which rarely shies away from rattling a few cages at Knowle’, the editorial points out that ‘The matter was first raised by (EDA member) Paul Freeman, who made ‘the alarming claim that 6,000 names had gone missing from the electoral roll in east Devon before the European elections’ , and that Mr Freeman’s question about it to Full Council in July  is said to have had “an arrogant brush off” by Mr Williams.

‘Mr. Freeman did not let the matter rest and maintains that Mr Williams had been invited to Westminster to “explain himself”.

As to be expected , the communications department of EDDC put a very different spin on it. They say Mr Williams had been invited in his capacity as returning officer for East Devon “to give evidence on voter engagement in rural areas”. ‘

The View from editor sums up as follows:  ‘A great deal of council business is delegated to unelected officers and that often means the flow of information to councillors, and indeed the public, leaves much to be desired.  Roger Giles, somewhat tongue in cheek, commented: “Have I missed something? Clearly he had—like the rest of us.’

 

 

 

Sidmouth dismissed?

While being questioned by the Parliamentary Select Committee yesterday, Mark Williams referred to “the two main towns in East Devon: Exmouth and Honiton.”

Sidmouth Councillors might not be too pleased to hear this. Should they let him know that Honiton’s population is substantially less than Sidmouth’s?

To check what was said, go to this link  https://eastdevonwatch.wordpress.com/2014/10/14/official-transcript-of-eddc-ceo-evidence-to-parliamentary-committee-on-voter-engagement/

 

 

 

The missing 6,000 voters and the additional 15 canvassers!

 24 September 2014

The following response was received to a Freedom of Information request:

“The current position is that 2 canvassers have been appointed but ideally the Council requires a minimum of 10 to ensure that the work can be done as effectively as possible. We are therefore re-advertising the positions from next week (week beginning 29th September) with a view to recruiting more Canvassers. Canvassing will commence from the week beginning 27th October.”

Source: http://eastdevonalliance.org/2014/09/24/the-missing-6000-voters-update-not-good-news/

 

7 October 2014

an email went out to all town and parish clerks in East Devon (and presumably to all internal EDDC staff) – coincidentally this is the date on the written evidence to the Parliamentary Select Committee from Mark Williams.

Source: http://eastdevonalliance.org/2014/10/13/eddc-appears-to-be-still-recruting-canvassers-writes-eda-chairman-paul-arnott/

On 14 October 2014 at the Parliamentary Committee on Voter engagement, Mr Williams was asked if all canvassers were now in post. He said YES. On that same day he sent out an urgent appeal to town and parish clerks to try to find additional canvassers as soon as possible to start work on 28 October 2014.

Source: http://eastdevonalliance.org/2014/09/24/the-missing-6000-voters-update-not-good-news/

 

13 October 2014

when asked if all canvassers had now been recruited, Mr Williams said Yes.

Source: http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/political-and-constitutional-reform-committee/voter-engagement-in-the-uk/oral/14118.html

 

14 October 2014

We learn from the Express and Echo website today that in all there are 25 canvassers who will start work on 28 October 2014.

“East Devon now has a pool of 25 canvassers, who will carry out household visits between 28 October and 28 November this year. The majority of those appointed have resulted from an internal advertisement among EDDC staff.”

Source: http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/East-Mid-Devon-district-council-chief-executives/story-23153767-detail/story.html

 

Anyone sniff the smell of panic and the sound of stable doors being bolted somewhere?

 

Source:

Official transcript of EDDC CEO evidence to Parliamentary Committee on Voter Engagement

http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/political-and-constitutional-reform-committee/voter-engagement-in-the-uk/oral/14118.html

EDDC CEO Written Evidence to Parliament yesterday: his best work comes from “ripping up the rule book”

but only in East Devon, not in South Somerset!

Written evidence submitted by Mark Williams,
Chief Executive for East Devon District Council (VUk 158)

page1image984
 Financing – The Council’s revenue budget is broadly funded 24% from the Council Tax, 25% from Government Grants and 51% from fees, charges & other income. As a matter of record, Government funding does not cover all the legal duties imposed on the Council and its officers.

 Impact of ‘Systems Thinking’ – Our greatest performance successes have come from ‘ripping up the rule book’ and departing from the stipulations of the Audit Commission (as was) under Comprehensive Performance Assessment/Comprehensive Area Assessment, or the DWP in terms of front/back office split for benefits processing. We have used ‘systems thinking’ derived from the Vanguard approach. Arguably the Electoral Commission is akin to the Audit Commission in the increasingly prescriptive nature of its ‘guidance’.

 Practical Experience – House to House canvassing is expensive and ineffective in a rural area, especially as it is carried out in late Oct/Nov. Assuming the property can be accessed, people don’t tend to answer their doors after dark and also resent being ‘harassed’ at the weekend. Is it fair to expose my staff to (real – not the risk of) verbal abuse and physical assault? How much should one spend chasing those who won’t vote?

 Dec 2013 Electoral Register – We achieved a 95% registration rate without house to house canvassing. This was secured by using the post, e-mail, phone calling and data matching of internal data sets.

Issues

 Voter Confusion – Why is it a duty to register but only a right to vote?

 Voter Alienation – Those who understand the system resent the existence of the Open Register and the fact that it is on general sale. As regards the Full Register they don’t necessarily trust credit reference agencies or registered politicial parties/individual candidates with their data. Fears of abuse/misuse etc.

 Voter Turnout – What is a realistic target for turnout?

Scottish Referendum 2014 European Elections 2014

84.6% 34.2% 41.1% 65.1% 72.6%

Current/Future State

 Making a success of IER – I am sure I am not the only ERO who has concerns about the transitional impact of IER and the practical implementation difficulties of administering the new system. A particular concern is the capacity/ability of our software supplier to make timely changes. We have provided all the information required of us by the Electoral Commission.

 Target No. Of Voters – Based on the 2011 Census the likely number of eligible voters is approximately 107,000 for the EDDC administrative area. As at the 7th October we had captured 100,735 registered electors (approx 94%).

 Budgetary Overspend – I have confirmed to my manager that she has an ‘open’ budget this year in order to ensure that we have enough staff resource to make a success of the new IER.

 House Canvass – We have recruited canvassers and will be carrying out a house to house canvass with the target objective that every occupied house in the EDDC area will have been visited. Out of a total 66,586 properties:

Returns = 56,936
Second Homes = 2,479
Empty Props = 1,522 Outstanding Properties = 5,649

7 October 2014

Source:http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/political-and-constitutional-reform-committee/voter-engagement-in-the-uk/written/13688.pdf

The missing 6,000 voters: Express and Echo and Western Morning News report on Parliamentary Select Committee investigation

Much interesting stuff in both articles with some amazing comments from the two Chief Executives!

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/East-Mid-Devon-district-council-chief-executives/story-23153767-detail/story.html

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/repeatedly-brazenly/story-23154231-detail/story.html

“In written evidence to the committee, Mr Williams wrote: “How much should one spend chasing those who won’t vote?”

And just how much should be spent on those who DO want to vote, Mr Williams?